Index ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWYabandoned propertyKalas v Farmerabatement noticesBudd v Colchester BCR v Bristol CC ex p EverettSFI Group plc v Gosport BCCanterbury CC v FerrisR (Anne) v Test Valley BCabatement ordersAshard v Islington LBCabroad, accommodation situated :continued occupation, reasonableness ofOsei v Southwark LBCR v Camden LBC ex p ArandaR v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p MonafR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Duro-RamaR v Newham LBC ex p Ajayiabroad, accommodation situated :employment prospects, consideration ofR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Duro-Ramaabroad, accommodation situated :financial circumstancesR v Camden LBC ex p Arandaabroad, accommodation situated :homelessnessOsei v Southwark LBCR v Camden LBC ex p ArandaR v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p MonafR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Duro-RamaR v Newham LBC ex p Ajayiabroad, accommodation situated :national status, consideration ofR v Newham LBC ex p Ajayiabroad, accommodation situated :overcrowdingOsei v Southwark LBCabroad, accommodation situated :pattern of life, consideration ofR v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Monafabroad, accommodation situated :reasons for coming to UK, considerations ofR v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Monafabroad, accommodation situated :settled accommodation and intentional homelessnessR v Croydon LBC ex p Easomabroad, accommodation situated :social history, consideration ofR v Newham LBC ex p Ajayiabroad, accommodation situated :social security benefits, loss ofR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Duro-Ramaabroad, persons from:allocationGeneralabroad, persons from:categoriesEligibilityabroad, persons from:homelessnessEligibilityR v Hillingdon LBC ex p StreetingR v Westminster CC ex p Augustinabroad, persons from:immigration control, persons subject toEligibilityLekpo-Bozua v Hackney LBCabroad, persons from:intentional homelessnessDin v Wandsworth LBCabroad, persons from:lawfully in UK, duties owed to all personsR v Hillingdon LBC ex p Streetingabroad, persons from:Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002Introductionabroad, persons from:without accommodation, bringing family from abroadR v Hillingdon LBC ex p Islamabsence from property:armed conflicts, absences due toWigley v Leighabsence from property:family elsewhere, tenants living withRegalian Securities Ltd v Scheuerabsence from property:hospital, tenants inHedgedale Ltd v Hardsabsence from property:intention to returnBrickfield Properties Ltd v HughesTickner v Hearnabsence from property:long periods, absence forOccupation as a residence; Rent Act 1977 s2(1)(a)Bevington v CrawfordBrickfield Properties Ltd v HughesGofor Investments v RobertsPrince v RobinsonChamberlain v Scalleyabsence from property:nights a week, staying in property only a fewBlanway Investments Ltd v Lynchabsence from property:occupation as a residenceOccupation as a residence; Rent Act 1977 s2(1)(a)Hampstead Way Investments Ltd v Lewis-WeareBevington v CrawfordBlanway Investments Ltd v LynchBrickfield Properties Ltd v HughesGofor Investments v RobertsPrince v RobinsonRegalian Securities Ltd v ScheuerWigley v Leighabsence from property:rent arrears, withChamberlain v Scalleyabsence from property:sleep, use of flat just forHampstead Way Investments Ltd v Lewis-Weareabsence from property:subtenanciesBrent LBC v CroninCrawley BC v Sawyerabsence from property:successionSheffield CC v Wallabsence from property:surrenderChamberlain v Scalleyabuse leading to psychological harmYemshaw v Hounslow LBCabuse of process:disrepairHenley v Bloomabuse of process:mortgage possession proceedingsSecurum Finance Ltd v Ashtonabuse of process:possession orders, setting asideHackney LBC v WhiteSetting aside warrants after executionCamden LBC v AkanniHackney LBC v WhiteHammersmith and Fulham LBC v HillJephson Homes HA v Moisejevsaccelerated possession procedureManel v Memonaccess to property:Defective Premises Act 1972McAuley v Bristol CCWadsworth v Nagleaccess to property:improvementsYeomans Row Management Ltd v Bodentien-Meyrickaccess to property:nuisance, abatement ofJones v Walsall MBCaccess to property:repairsEmpson v FordeYeomans Row Management Ltd v Bodentien-Meyrickaccess to property:trespassersCountryside Residential (North Thames) Ltd v Tugwellaccommodation, definition of‘Accommodation’R v Brent LBC ex p AwuaR v Ealing LBC ex p Sidhuacoustic evidenceLewisham LBC v Hallacquiescence and homelessness:behaviour of others, acquiescence inR v Nottingham CC ex p CaineR v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Khatun (Asma)R v Eastleigh BC ex p Beattie (No 2)R v North Devon DC ex p LewisR v Penwith DC ex p TrevenaR v Swansea CC ex p JohnR v West Dorset DC ex p Phillipsacquiescence and homelessness:evidenceR v Eastleigh BC ex p Beattie (No 2)R v West Dorset DC ex p Phillipsacquiescence and homelessness:intentional homelessnessIntentional homelessnessR v Nottingham CC ex p CaineR v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Khatun (Asma)R v Eastleigh BC ex p Beattie (No 2)R v North Devon DC ex p LewisR v Penwith DC ex p TrevenaR v Swansea CC ex p JohnR v West Dorset DC ex p Phillipsacquiescence and homelessness:leave, not asking partners toR v Swansea CC ex p Johnacquiescence and homelessness:nuisance and annoyanceGriffiths v St Helens MBCR v Swansea CC ex p Johnacquiescence and homelessness:partners, consideration of applications byR v North Devon DC ex p Lewisacquiescence and homelessness:reconciliation with partner after termination of tenanciesR v Penwith DC ex p Trevenaacquiescence and homelessness:spouses leaving decisions to other spouseR v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Khatun (Asma)acquiescence and homelessness:withholding rent, inferring partner knew that applicant wasR v Nottingham CC ex p Caineadaptations:assurances that work will be doneBoreh v Ealing LBCadaptations:disabled personsBoreh v Ealing LBCadaptations:homelessnessBoreh v Ealing LBCadjournments of possession proceedingsAdjournmentsBates v Croydon LBCBrent LBC v AniedobeKingscastle Ltd v Owen-OwenNorth Camden Housing Cooperative Ltd v O’SullivanSpitaliotis v MorganVerrilli v IdigorasR v A Circuit Judge (sitting at Norwich County Court) ex p Wathenadjournments of possession proceedings:appeals in other cases, pending outcomes ofKingscastle Ltd v Owen-Owenadjournments of possession proceedings:arrears, payment ofR v A Circuit Judge (sitting at Norwich County Court) ex p WathenHalifax plc v TaffsSkandia Financial Services Ltd v Greenfieldadjournments of possession proceedings:committal proceedingsStafford BC v Haynesadjournments of possession proceedings:defence, refusal where there is noNorth Camden Housing Cooperative Ltd v O’Sullivanadjournments of possession proceedings:discretionMilecastle Housing Ltd v Waltonadjournments of possession proceedings:evidenceBrent LBC v AniedobeSpitaliotis v Morganadjournments of possession proceedings:exceptional circumstancesNorth British Housing Association Limited v Matthewsadjournments of possession proceedings:execution of warrantsCheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Obiadjournments of possession proceedings:forfeiture, claims forR v A Circuit Judge (sitting at Norwich County Court) ex p Wathenadjournments of possession proceedings:injunctionsStafford BC v Haynesadjournments of possession proceedings:language difficultiesVerrilli v Idigorasadjournments of possession proceedings:legal aid, to obtainBates v Croydon LBCadjournments of possession proceedings:legal representationBates v Croydon LBCVerrilli v Idigorasadjournments of possession proceedings:mortgage possession proceedings:arrears, payment ofHalifax plc v TaffsSkandia Financial Services Ltd v Greenfieldadjournments of possession proceedings:mortgage possession proceedings:execution of warrantsCheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Obiadjournments of possession proceedings:mortgage possession proceedings:limited powerBirmingham Citizens Permanent Building Society v Cauntadjournments of possession proceedings:mortgage possession proceedings:reasonable periodFirst Middlesbrough Trading and Mortgage Co Ltd v CunninghamSkandia Financial Services Ltd v Greenfieldadjournments of possession proceedings:new evidence, to considerBrent LBC v Aniedobeadjournments of possession proceedings:reasonable periodFirst Middlesbrough Trading and Mortgage Co Ltd v CunninghamSkandia Financial Services Ltd v Greenfieldadjournments of possession proceedings:rebuttal evidence where landlords not taken by surpriseSpitaliotis v Morganadjournments of possession proceedings:rent arrears, payment ofNorth British Housing Association Limited v MatthewsMilecastle Housing Ltd v WaltonLee-Steere v JenningsR v A Circuit Judge (sitting at Norwich County Court) ex p Wathenadjournments of possession proceedings:setting aside orders where refusal to adjournLee-Steere v Jenningsadjournments of possession proceedings:unrepresented, where tenantVerrilli v Idigorasadvice and assistanceGeneralR (Nipyo) v Croydon LBCaffordability :assessmentsR v Brent LBC ex p Grossettaffordability :cheaper but unsettled accommodation, reasonableness of move toR v Croydon LBC ex p Grahamaffordability :continued occupation, reasonableness ofReasonable to continue to occupy: s175(3)R v Brent LBC ex p BaruwaR v Brent LBC ex p GrossettR v Croydon LBC ex p GrahamR v Wandsworth LBC ex p HawthorneR v Hillingdon LBC ex p Tinnaffordability :deliberate failure to pay rentR v Brent LBC ex p Baruwaaffordability :homelessnessReasonable to continue to occupy: s175(3)R v Brent LBC ex p BaruwaR v Brent LBC ex p GrossettR v Croydon LBC ex p GrahamR v Wandsworth LBC ex p HawthorneR v Hillingdon LBC ex p TinnMohamed v Westminster CCOdunsi v Brent LBCSuitability and out of area placementsaffordability :necessities of life, paying forR v Brent LBC ex p BaruwaR v Hillingdon LBC ex p Tinnaffordability :rentR v Brent LBC ex p BaruwaR v Wandsworth LBC ex p Hawthorneaffordability :settled accommodation and intentional homelessnessMohamed v Westminster CCaffordability :suitability of accommodationSuitability and out of area placementsaffordability :travel to accommodationBegum (Nipa) v Tower Hamlets LBCage of premisesMcClean v Liverpool CCNewham LBC v Patelagents:commencement of possession proceedingsChesters Accommodation Agency Ltd v Abebreseagents:depositsDraycott and Draycott v Hannells Letting Limitedagents:exemplary damagesRamdath v Daleyagents:harassment and illegal evictionSampson v WilsonRamdath v Daleyagents:homelessness decisions, notification of decisions toDharmaraj v Hounslow LBCagents:rent, tender ofBessa Plus v Lancasteragents:standingChesters Accommodation Agency Ltd v Abebreseaggravated damagesFestusi Porbeni v Abdellaziz ChaabdissAsghar v AhmedNaveed v RajaRubio-Manzano v Ace Lettings and Pedonomouagricultural employees :farm workers need no longer pay rent, agreements thatFoster v Robinsonagricultural employees :grounds for possessionAgricultural employeesFowler v MinchinSpringfield Investments Ltd v Bellagricultural employees :notices for possession, invalidity ofFowler v MinchinSpringfield Investments Ltd v Bellagricultural employees :Rent Act tenanciesAgricultural employeesagricultural employees :surrenderFoster v Robinsonagricultural holdingsManorlike Ltd v Le Vitas Travel Agencyallocation of housing:abroad, persons fromGeneralallocation of housing:administrative practiceR (Faarah) v Southwark LBCallocation of housing:adult childrenR (Ariemuguvbe) v Islington LBCallocation of housing:advice and assistanceGeneralallocation of housing:alternative accommodationR (Adow) v Newham LBCallocation of housing:anxiety and stressBrown v Brent LBCallocation of housing:appealsGeneralallocation of housing:appropriate, allocation in manner council deemsGeneralallocation of housing:assessment of needsGeneralallocation of housing:assumptions, irrationality andR (Maali) v Lambeth LBCallocation of housing:asylum seekersGeneralallocation of housing:bandingR (Bauer-Czarnomski) v Ealing LBCallocation of housing:causationDavenport v Walsall MBCallocation of housing:cockroach infestationOgunlowo v Southwark LBCallocation of housing:compensation ordersBudd v Colchester BCallocation of housing:condensationOgunlowo v Southwark LBCallocation of housing:consent ordersR v Bloomsbury and Marylebone County Court ex p Blackburneallocation of housing:dateR (Kabashi) v Redbridge LBCallocation of housing:definitionGeneralallocation of housing:discretionGeneralallocation of housing:drug convictionsDixon v Wandsworth LBCallocation of housing:eligible personsGeneralR (Ariemuguvbe) v Islington LBCDixon v Wandsworth LBCR (Kimvono) v Tower Hamlets LBCallocation of housing:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings underCriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 and other ActsBotross v Hammersmith and Fulham LBCDavenport v Walsall MBCallocation of housing:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under:abatement orders, failure to comply withAshard v Islington LBCallocation of housing:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under:causationDavenport v Walsall MBCallocation of housing:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under:costsDavenport v Walsall MBCallocation of housing:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under:dateR v Liverpool Crown Court ex p Cookeallocation of housing:exclusionsGeneralR (Ariemuguvbe) v Islington LBCallocation of housing:factors to be taken into accountGeneralallocation of housing:gravity of needsR (Ahmad) v Newham LBCallocation of housing:guidanceGeneralallocation of housing:guilty pleasDavenport v Walsall MBCallocation of housing:homeless persons:priorityGeneralallocation of housing:homeless persons:reasonable preferenceR (Lin) v Barnet LBCallocation of housing:householdsR (Kimvono) v Tower Hamlets LBCallocation of housing:individual circumstances, consideration ofR v Canterbury CC ex p Gillespieallocation of housing:irrationalityR (Maali) v Lambeth LBCallocation of housing:judicial reviewGeneralallocation of housing:larger properties, start date based on date of re-assessment forR (Kabashi) v Redbridge LBCallocation of housing:medical advisers, opinions ofR (Bauer-Czarnomski) v Ealing LBCallocation of housing:medical assessmentsR (Adow) v Newham LBCallocation of housing:multiple needs, assessment ofGeneralallocation of housing:notice, expiry ofR v Liverpool Crown Court ex p Cookeallocation of housing:nullified by other factors, preferences asR v Wolverhampton MBC ex p Wattersallocation of housing:outsourcing medical assessmentsR (Adow) v Newham LBCallocation of housing:pointsR (Lin) v Barnet LBCallocation of housing:possession ordersDixon v Wandsworth LBCallocation of housing:principlesHerbert v Lambeth LBCallocation of housing:priorities/preferencesGeneralR (Faarah) v Southwark LBCR (Kabashi) v Redbridge LBCReasonable preferenceR (Ahmad) v Newham LBCR v Wolverhampton MBC ex p WattersR (Lin) v Barnet LBCR (Babakandi) v Westminster CCallocation of housing:procedureR (Lin) v Barnet LBCallocation of housing:quantumDavenport v Walsall MBCallocation of housing:quota system, operation of an ad hocR (Babakandi) v Westminster CCallocation of housing:re-assessment for larger properties, start date based on date ofR (Kabashi) v Redbridge LBCallocation of housing:reasonable preferenceGeneralR (Kabashi) v Redbridge LBCReasonable preferenceR (Ahmad) v Newham LBCR v Wolverhampton MBC ex p WattersR (Lin) v Barnet LBCR (Babakandi) v Westminster CCallocation of housing:rent arrearsR v Wolverhampton MBC ex p WattersR (Babakandi) v Westminster CCallocation of housing:sale, afterClements v Simmondsallocation of housing:schemesGeneralR (Ariemuguvbe) v Islington LBCR (Ahmad) v Newham LBCR (Lin) v Barnet LBCR (Babakandi) v Westminster CCallocation of housing:single route into social housingGeneralallocation of housing:statutory categories of preferenceGeneralallocation of housing:suitability as tenantsGeneralallocation of housing:suspension from biddingR (Babakandi) v Westminster CCallocation of housing:transfersGeneralR (Ahmad) v Newham LBCR (Lin) v Barnet LBCallocation of housing:unlawful, unpublished administrative practice asR (Faarah) v Southwark LBCallocation of housing:void, allocations made outside scheme as not beingBirmingham CC v Qasimallocation to tracksBirmingham CC v LeeAlmshousesGray v TaylorWatts v Stewartalternative accommodation:allocationR (Adow) v Newham LBCalternative accommodation:delayOffice public d’habitation de la Ville de Paris v Yedeialternative accommodation:disrepairLubren v Lambeth LBCMcGreal v Wakealternative accommodation:evidence of attempts by tenantsAlexander v Mohamadzadehalternative accommodation:hardshipBaker v MacIveralternative accommodation:homelessnessMuse v Brent LBCalternative accommodation:judicial notice of problems finding furnished accommodationBassett v Fraseralternative accommodation:landlords finding accommodation, prospect ofCoombes v Parryalternative accommodation:landlords or members of family, premises required forAlexander v MohamadzadehBaker v MacIverBassett v FraserCoombes v Parryalternative accommodation:nuisance or annoyanceDarlington BC v Sterlingalternative accommodation:private and family life and home, right to respect forOffice public d’habitation de la Ville de Paris v Yedeialternative accommodation:prospect of finding accommodationBaker v MacIverBassett v FraserCoombes v Parryalternative accommodation:redecoration after affairsMcGreal v Wakeanxiety and stress, compensation forBrown v Brent LBCapologiesR (Bernard) v Enfield LBCappealsAppealsEaling LBC v RichardsonLaw Land v SinclairMoat Housing Group South Ltd v Harris and HartlessTaj v Ali (No 2)appeals:allocationGeneralappeals:Civil Procedure RulesAppealsappeals:county courtsPlymouth CC v HoskinR v Mansfield DC ex p Ashfield Nomineesappeals:court managers refusal to accept appealsGwynedd CC v Grunshawappeals:Court of Appeal, role ofBracknell Forest BC v Greenappeals:delivery to courtGwynedd CC v Grunshawappeals:disrepair, damages forBrent LBC v Carmel (sued as Murphy)Davies v Petersonappeals:drugs, conspiracy to supplyKnowsley Housing Trust v Prescottappeals:further evidenceLee-Steere v Jenningsappeals:grounds for possessionBracknell Forest BC v Greenappeals:hearsayAnti-social behaviour (Housing Acts 1985 and 1988)appeals:injunctionsMedina Housing Association v Connollyappeals:jurisdictionAdmiral Taverns (Cygnet) Ltd v Daniel and Dalyappeals:listing, no further breaches beforeBarnet LBC v Hurleyappeals:mortgage possession proceedingsHyde Park Funding Ltd v IoannouLloyds TSB plc v Jayashankarappeals:new material not sufficiently unexpected, whereTaj v Ali (No 2)appeals:nominal damagesDavies v Petersonappeals:notice of appeal hopeless, striking out confined to whereLaw Land v Sinclairappeals:notice requiring possessionBarker v Handsappeals:nuisance or annoyanceAnti-social behaviour (Housing Acts 1985 and 1988)CDS Housing v BellisMatthews v AhmedKnowsley Housing Trust v Prescottappeals:occupation as a residenceRichards v Greenappeals:outright order made by Court of Appeal, tenants only taking matter seriously whenTaj v Ali (No 2)appeals:permissionBarker v HandsBrent LBC v Carmel (sued as Murphy)appeals:possession orders:county court, continuing remedies inPlymouth CC v Hoskinappeals:possession orders:enforcement ofAdmiral Taverns (Cygnet) Ltd v Daniel and Dalyappeals:possession orders:postponementKnowsley Housing Trust v Prescottappeals:possession orders:second appeals, no compelling reason forPlymouth CC v Hoskinappeals:possession orders:setting asideSetting aside possession ordersappeals:possession orders:suspensionTaj v Ali (No 2)Hyde Park Funding Ltd v IoannouLloyds TSB plc v Jayashankarappeals:possession proceedingsKingscastle Ltd v Owen-OwenAppealsEaling LBC v RichardsonLaw Land v SinclairMoat Housing Group South Ltd v Harris and HartlessTaj v Ali (No 2)appeals:prejudiceMoat Housing Group South Ltd v Harris and Hartlessappeals:public health and environmental protectionGwynedd CC v GrunshawR v Mansfield DC ex p Ashfield Nomineesappeals:rehearingsBracknell Forest BC v GreenEaling LBC v Richardsonappeals:rent arrearsLee-Steere v Jenningsappeals:second appeals, no compelling reason forPlymouth CC v Hoskinappeals:stay of possession proceedings pending appealMoat Housing Group South Ltd v Harris and Hartlessappeals:striking outLaw Land v Sinclairappeals:suitable alternative accommodationLee v Whitehouseappeals:suspension of possession ordersAdmiral Taverns (Cygnet) Ltd v Daniel and DalyEaling LBC v RichardsonTaj v Ali (No 2)Hyde Park Funding Ltd v IoannouLloyds TSB plc v Jayashankarappeals:suspension of warrants before executionBarnet LBC v HurleyarbitrationAhmed v Southwark LBCarmed conflicts, absences due toWigley v Leigharmed forcesMinistry of Defence v AshmanMinistry of Defence v ThompsonShi v Jiangsu Native Produce Import & Export CorparrestAnti-social behaviourArticle 1 of Protocol 1 with Article 14 discriminationVrountou v CyprusArticle 1 of Protocol 1 with Article 14 discrimination: interference withAlentseva v RussiaAquilina v MaltaassaultNaveed v RajaRubio-Manzano v Ace Lettings and Pedonomouassessment of needs :allocationGeneralassessment of needs :breach of tenanciesPeabody Donation Fund v Higginsassessment of needs :consentSanctuary Housing Association v BakerPazgate Ltd v McGrathassessment of needs :false statementsIslington LBC v Uckacassessment of needs :forfeitureChurch Commissioners for England v Nodjoumiassessment of needs :fraudSanctuary Housing Association v Bakerassessment of needs :homelessnessR (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBCassessment of needs :implied surrenderSanctuary Housing Association v Bakerassessment of needs :intentionCamden LBC v Goldenbergassessment of needs :joint tenantsBurton v Camden LBCassessment of needs :misrepresentationIslington LBC v Uckacassessment of needs :move elsewhere if opportunity arose, not displaced byCamden LBC v Goldenbergassessment of needs :multiple needsGeneralassessment of needs :mutual exchanges, right toBurton v Camden LBCassessment of needs :possession ordersCroydon LBC v Buston and Trianceassessment of needs :properly assigned, tenant unable to show tenancyCroydon LBC v Buston and Trianceassessment of needs :rent arrearsNotting Hill Housing Trust v Jonesassessment of needs :residence testCamden LBC v Goldenbergassessment of needs :security of tenureAssignments (secure tenants)Burton v Camden LBCCamden LBC v GoldenbergCroydon LBC v Buston and TriancePeabody Donation Fund v HigginsSanctuary Housing Association v Bakerassessment of needs :subtenanciesPazgate Ltd v McGrathassessment of needs :successionSanctuary Housing Association v Bakerassessment of needs :surrenderSanctuary Housing Association v BakerCamden LBC v Alexandrouassured shorthold tenancies:28 February, tenancies granted on or afterRequirements for assured shorthold tenancyassured shorthold tenanciesIntroductionassured shorthold tenancies:accelerated possession procedureManel v Memonassured shorthold tenancies:assured tenanciesAndrews v Cunninghamassured shorthold tenancies:business tenanciesAndrews v Brewerassured shorthold tenancies:continued occupation, reasonableness ofR v Croydon LBC ex p Jarvisassured shorthold tenancies:depositsTenancy deposits and the Housing Act 2004UK Housing Alliance (North West) Ltd v FrancisDraycott and Draycott v Hannells Letting Limitedassured shorthold tenancies:documents, rigorous consideration ofManel v Memonassured shorthold tenancies:fixed termsIntroductionRequirements for assured shorthold tenancyassured shorthold tenancies:formalitiesRequirements for assured shorthold tenancyassured shorthold tenancies:grounds for possessionIntroductionassured shorthold tenancies:higher rent, written agreements forBhopal v Waliaassured shorthold tenancies:homelessnessR v Croydon LBC ex p JarvisKnight v Vale Royal BCGriffiths v St Helens Councilassured shorthold tenancies:notice requiring possessionIntroductionNotice requiring possession (Housing Act 1988 s21)Aylward v FawazBarker v HandsChurch Commissioners for England v MeyaElias v SpencerFernandez v McDonaldGracechurch International v Tribhovan and AbdulLower Street Properties v JonesNotting Hill Housing Trust v RoomusSingh v Emmanuelassured shorthold tenancies:orally, tenancies grantedRequirements for assured shorthold tenancyassured shorthold tenancies:possession proceedingsIntroductionassured shorthold tenancies:rent arrearsRent arrearsassured shorthold tenancies:rent assessment committeesPark Lane Properties Ltd v Northern Rent Assessment Committeeassured shorthold tenancies:rent booksAndrews v Cunninghamassured shorthold tenancies:rent regulationPark Lane Properties Ltd v Northern Rent Assessment Committeeassured shorthold tenancies:section 20 noticesRequirements for assured shorthold tenancyassured shorthold tenancies:security of tenureIntroductionassured shorthold tenancies:separate dwelling, let as aAndrews v Brewerassured shorthold tenancies:shamsBhopal v Waliaassured shorthold tenancies:time limitsIntroductionassured shorthold tenancies:Tomlin orders, schedule for execution of AST inKahlon v Isherwoodassured shorthold tenancies:written agreementsBhopal v Waliaassured tenancies: rent regulationChouhan v The Earl’s High SchoolPreston v Area Estates Ltd and London Rent Assessment Panelassured tenancies:assured shorthold tenanciesAndrews v CunninghamBhopal v Waliaassured tenancies:board and attendanceBoard and attendanceassured tenancies:breach of obligations as ground for possessionBreach of obligationBreach of obligation (Housing Act 1988 Sch 2 Ground 12)Pollards Hill HA v MarshSanctuary Housing Association v Baker (No 2)assured tenancies:business tenanciesBusiness tenancies (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 11, Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 4 and Rent Act 1977 s24)Broadway Investments Hackney Ltd v GrantCheryl Investments Ltd v SaldanhaGurton v ParrottLewis v Weldcrest LtdPulleng v CurranTan v SitkowskiWagle v Trustees of Henry Smith’s Charity Kensington EstateWright v Mortimerassured tenancies:company letsCompany letsassured tenancies:continuation of tenanciesThe effect of possession orders – in generalassured tenancies:contractual tenancies, surrender ofTruro Diocesan Board of Finance Ltd v Foleyassured tenancies:Crown Estates Commissioners, transfer of property to housing associations byCrown Estate Commissioners v Governors of the Peabody Trustassured tenancies:death of tenantsDeath of tenantassured tenancies:demolition or redevelopment, property required forProperty required for demolition or redevelopmentassured tenancies:employees, licences forLicences – occupation granted to employeesassured tenancies:false statementsTenancy obtained by false statementassured tenancies:former employeesFormer employeesassured tenancies:grounds for possessionIntroductionOwner-occupiersReturning owner-occupier (Housing Act 1988 Sch 2 Ground 1)Boyle v VerrallHegab v ShamashMustafa v Ruddockassured tenancies:harassment and illegal eviction, damages forCashmere v Walsh, Downing and VealeGrillo v Cant and Bassairi Ltdassured tenancies:high or low rent, tenancies at aTenancies at a high or low rent (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 paras 2 and 3 and Rent Act 1977 ss4–5)Bostock v Bryant and Anotherassured tenancies:holiday letsHoliday lets (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 9 and Rent Act 1977 s9)Buchmann v MayKillick v RobertsR v Rent Officer for Camden LBC ex p PlantMcHale v Danehamassured tenancies:housing associationsAssured tenancy transitional provisionsCrown Estate Commissioners v Governors of the Peabody Trustassured tenancies:introductory tenanciesIntroductory tenanciesassured tenancies:licencesLicences – occupation granted to employeesassured tenancies:new tenancies remain protectedKotecha v Rimingtonassured tenancies:notice to quitSubletting the whole of premisesassured tenancies:nuisance or annoyanceAnti-social behaviourRaglan Housing Association Ltd v FaircloughKensington Housing Trust v Borkwoodassured tenancies:occupation as a residenceOccupation as a residence; Rent Act 1977 s2(1)(a)assured tenancies:only or principal home, occupation asOccupation as only or principal home: Housing Act 1985 s81 and Housing Act 1988 s1(1)(b); Prohibition against subletting: Housing Act 1985 s93 and Housing Act 1988 s15ABrent LBC v CroninCrawley BC v SawyerGay v SheeranHammersmith and Fulham LBC v ClarkeHussey v Camden LBCJennings v Epping Forest DCLambeth LBC v VandraMerton LBC v SalamaMuir Group Housing Association Ltd v ThornleySutton LBC v SwannUjima Housing Association v AnsahAmoah v Barking and Dagenham LBCWaltham Forest CBHA v FanningNotting Hill Housing Trust v EtoriaMcLoughlin’s Curator Bonis v Motherwell DCassured tenancies:owner-occupiers and grounds for possessionOwner-occupiersReturning owner-occupier (Housing Act 1988 Sch 2 Ground 1)Boyle v VerrallHegab v ShamashMustafa v Ruddockassured tenancies:possession ordersLaimond Properties Ltd v Al-ShakarchiIntroduction and general considerationsThe effect of possession orders – in generalSetting aside warrants after executionassured tenancies:prior to Housing Act 1988, tenant not protectedSecretarial Nominee Co Ltd v Thomasassured tenancies:rentRent regulation (assured tenants)Riverside Housing Association Ltd v WhiteBankway Properties v DunsfordContour Homes Ltd v RowenHughes v Borodex LtdR (Lester) v London Rent Assessment CommitteeR (Morris) v London Rent Assessment CommitteeTadema Holdings v FergusonEarl of Cadogan v ChehabGhani v London Rent Assessment CommitteeLondon District Properties Management Ltd v GoolamyN & D (London) Ltd v GadsonR v London Rent Assessment Panel ex p Cadogan EstatesR (Innes) v Northern Rent Assessment PanelRowe v South West Rent Assessment Panelassured tenancies:Rent Act tenanciesAssured tenancy transitional provisions12Laimond Properties Ltd v Al-Shakarchi12Rajah v Arogol Co Ltd12Secretarial Nominee Co Ltd v Thomas12Truro Diocesan Board of Finance Ltd v Foley12Crown Estate Commissioners v Governors of the Peabody Trust12Swanbrae Ltd v RyderGoringe v Twinsectra Ltd12Kotecha v Rimington12assured tenancies:rent arrearsRent arrears (Housing Act 1988 Sch 2 Grounds 8, 10 and 11)Artesian Residential Investments Ltd v BeckBaygreen Properties Ltd v GilBessa Plus v LancasterCapital Prime Plus plc v WillsDay v ColtraneLeadenhall Residential 2 Ltd v StirlingNorth British Housing Association Limited v MatthewsR (Weaver) v London & Quadrant Housing TrustDiab v Countrywide Rentals 1 plcEtherington v BurtMilecastle Housing Ltd v Waltonassured tenancies:rent books, use of words onAndrews v Cunninghamassured tenancies:rent regulationRent regulation (assured tenants)Riverside Housing Association Ltd v WhiteBankway Properties v DunsfordContour Homes Ltd v RowenHughes v Borodex LtdR (Lester) v London Rent Assessment CommitteeR (Morris) v London Rent Assessment CommitteeTadema Holdings v FergusonEarl of Cadogan v ChehabGhani v London Rent Assessment CommitteeLondon District Properties Management Ltd v GoolamyN & D (London) Ltd v GadsonR v London Rent Assessment Panel ex p Cadogan EstatesR (Innes) v Northern Rent Assessment PanelRowe v South West Rent Assessment Panelassured tenancies:resident landlordsResident landlords (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 10 and Rent Act 1977 s12)Bardrick v HaycockBarnes v GoresuchCooper v TaitGriffiths v EnglishJackson v PekicLewis-Graham v ConacherO’Sullivan v BarnettPalmer v McNamaraWolff v Waddingtonassured tenancies:same or substantially the same premisesRajah v Arogol Co LtdGoringe v Twinsectra Ltdassured tenancies:ScotlandLaimond Properties Ltd v Al-Shakarchiassured tenancies:secure tenanciesAssured tenancy transitional provisionsassured tenancies:security of tenure:board and attendanceBoard and attendanceassured tenancies:security of tenure:business tenanciesBusiness tenancies (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 11, Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 4 and Rent Act 1977 s24)Broadway Investments Hackney Ltd v GrantCheryl Investments Ltd v SaldanhaGurton v ParrottLewis v Weldcrest LtdPulleng v CurranTan v SitkowskiWagle v Trustees of Henry Smith’s Charity Kensington EstateWright v Mortimerassured tenancies:security of tenure:definitionIntroductionassured tenancies:security of tenure:exceptionsIntroductionBusiness tenancies (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 11, Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 4 and Rent Act 1977 s24)Broadway Investments Hackney Ltd v GrantCheryl Investments Ltd v SaldanhaGurton v ParrottLewis v Weldcrest LtdPulleng v CurranTan v SitkowskiWagle v Trustees of Henry Smith’s Charity Kensington EstateWright v MortimerHoliday lets (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 9 and Rent Act 1977 s9)Buchmann v MayKillick v RobertsR v Rent Officer for Camden LBC ex p PlantMcHale v Danehamassured tenancies:security of tenure:high or low rent, tenancies at aTenancies at a high or low rent (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 paras 2 and 3 and Rent Act 1977 ss4–5)Bostock v Bryant and Anotherassured tenancies:security of tenure:holiday letsHoliday lets (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 9 and Rent Act 1977 s9)Buchmann v MayKillick v RobertsR v Rent Officer for Camden LBC ex p PlantMcHale v Danehamassured tenancies:security of tenure:only or principal home, occupation asOccupation as only or principal home: Housing Act 1985 s81 and Housing Act 1988 s1(1)(b); Prohibition against subletting: Housing Act 1985 s93 and Housing Act 1988 s15ABrent LBC v CroninCrawley BC v SawyerGay v SheeranHammersmith and Fulham LBC v ClarkeHussey v Camden LBCJennings v Epping Forest DCLambeth LBC v VandraMerton LBC v SalamaMuir Group Housing Association Ltd v ThornleySutton LBC v SwannUjima Housing Association v AnsahAmoah v Barking and Dagenham LBCWaltham Forest CBHA v FanningNotting Hill Housing Trust v EtoriaMcLoughlin’s Curator Bonis v Motherwell DCassured tenancies:security of tenure:rentRent regulation (assured tenants)Riverside Housing Association Ltd v WhiteBankway Properties v DunsfordContour Homes Ltd v RowenHughes v Borodex LtdR (Lester) v London Rent Assessment CommitteeR (Morris) v London Rent Assessment CommitteeTadema Holdings v FergusonEarl of Cadogan v ChehabGhani v London Rent Assessment CommitteeLondon District Properties Management Ltd v GoolamyN & D (London) Ltd v GadsonR v London Rent Assessment Panel ex p Cadogan EstatesR (Innes) v Northern Rent Assessment PanelRowe v South West Rent Assessment Panelassured tenancies:security of tenure:resident landlordsResident landlords (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 10 and Rent Act 1977 s12)Bardrick v HaycockBarnes v GoresuchCooper v TaitGriffiths v EnglishJackson v PekicLewis-Graham v ConacherO’Sullivan v BarnettPalmer v McNamaraWolff v Waddingtonassured tenancies:security of tenure:separate dwelling, let as aLet as a separate dwellingGoodrich v PaisnerUratemp Ventures Ltd v CollinsWestminster CC v ClarkeGray v BrownGrosvenor Estates Belgravia v CochranHorford Investments v LambertKavanagh v LyroudiasMansfield DC v LangridgeMiller v EyoMortgage Corporation v UbahParkins v Westminster CCSt Catherine’s College v DorlingTyler v Kensington and Chelsea RLBCR v Rent Officer of Nottinghamshire Registration Area ex p AllenAndrews v BrewerTomkins v Basildon DCWebb v Barnet LBCassured tenancies:security of tenure:successionSuccession to assured tenanciesSouthern Housing Group Ltd v Nuttingassured tenancies:security of tenure:transitional provisionsAssured tenancy transitional provisionsLaimond Properties Ltd v Al-ShakarchiRajah v Arogol Co LtdSecretarial Nominee Co Ltd v ThomasTruro Diocesan Board of Finance Ltd v FoleyCrown Estate Commissioners v Governors of the Peabody TrustGoringe v Twinsectra LtdKotecha v Rimingtonassured tenancies:security of tenure:variation of non-rent termsVariation of non-rent terms (secure tenants)assured tenancies:separate dwelling, let as aLet as a separate dwellingGoodrich v PaisnerUratemp Ventures Ltd v CollinsWestminster CC v ClarkeGray v BrownGrosvenor Estates Belgravia v CochranHorford Investments v LambertKavanagh v LyroudiasMansfield DC v LangridgeMiller v EyoMortgage Corporation v UbahParkins v Westminster CCSt Catherine’s College v DorlingTyler v Kensington and Chelsea RLBCR v Rent Officer of Nottinghamshire Registration Area ex p AllenAndrews v BrewerTomkins v Basildon DCWebb v Barnet LBCassured tenancies:subletting whole of premisesSubletting the whole of premisesassured tenancies:successionSuccession to assured tenanciesSouthern Housing Group Ltd v Nuttingassured tenancies:suitable alternative accommodationLaimond Properties Ltd v Al-ShakarchiSuitable alternative accommodationassured tenancies:surrenderTruro Diocesan Board of Finance Ltd v Foleyassured tenancies:transitional provisionsAssured tenancy transitional provisionsLaimond Properties Ltd v Al-ShakarchiRajah v Arogol Co LtdSecretarial Nominee Co Ltd v ThomasTruro Diocesan Board of Finance Ltd v FoleyCrown Estate Commissioners v Governors of the Peabody TrustGoringe v Twinsectra LtdKotecha v Rimingtonassured tenancies:use of words ‘assured tenancy’Andrews v Cunninghamassured tenancies:variation of non-rent termsVariation of non-rent terms (secure tenants)asylum seekers : supportIntroductionasylum seekers :allocationGeneralasylum seekers :destitution:National Assistance Act 1948Introductionasylum seekers :hard cases supportIntroductionasylum seekers :homelessnessLocal connection and referralAl-Ameri v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC; Osmani v Harrow LBCasylum seekers :ineligible personsGeneralasylum seekers :local connection and referralLocal connection and referralAl-Ameri v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC; Osmani v Harrow LBCasylum seekers :National Asylum Support ServicesMohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham LBCIntroductionasylum seekers :New Asylum ModelIntroductionasylum seekers :safety net servicesIntroductionavailability of accommodation:continued occupation, reasonableness of‘Available’ accommodation: s176Begum (Nipa) v Tower Hamlets LBCOxford CC v BullR v Westminster CC ex p BishopR v Barking and Dagenham LBC ex p OkuneyeR v Hackney LBC ex p TonnicodiR v Lambeth LBC ex p LyR v Newham LBC ex p Khan and HussainR v Peterborough CC ex p Carravailability of accommodation:dependent children‘Available’ accommodation: s176Oxford CC v Bullavailability of accommodation:familiesR v Lambeth LBC ex p Lyavailability of accommodation:fiancé, reasonableness of residing withR v Barking and Dagenham LBC ex p Okuneyeavailability of accommodation:friends and companions, reasonableness of living withR v Hackney LBC ex p Tonnicodiavailability of accommodation:homelessness‘Available’ accommodation: s176Begum (Nipa) v Tower Hamlets LBCOxford CC v BullR v Westminster CC ex p BishopR v Barking and Dagenham LBC ex p OkuneyeR v Hackney LBC ex p TonnicodiR v Lambeth LBC ex p LyR v Newham LBC ex p Khan and HussainR v Peterborough CC ex p Carravailability of accommodation:intentional homelessness when children come to living with parentsOxford CC v Bullavailability of accommodation:legal availability‘Available’ accommodation: s176availability of accommodation:partners to live with applicants, refusal of parents to allowR v Peterborough CC ex p Carravailability of accommodation:practical availability‘Available’ accommodation: s176Begum (Nipa) v Tower Hamlets LBCavailability of accommodation:reasonablenessR v Barking and Dagenham LBC ex p OkuneyeR v Hackney LBC ex p TonnicodiR v Lambeth LBC ex p Lyavailability of accommodation:sisters, splitting twoR v Newham LBC ex p Khan and Hussainavailability of accommodation:travel, affordability ofBegum (Nipa) v Tower Hamlets LBCavailability of accommodation:two separate units, provided inR v Hackney LBC ex p Tonnicodiavailability of accommodation:violence and harassment, fear ofR v Westminster CC ex p Bishopbabies, women withR v Brent LBC ex p YusufR v Newham LBC ex p DadabailiffsR v Wandsworth County Court ex p Wandsworth LBCHaniff v RobinsonFrancis v BrownbanistersWalker v Nottingham CCbankruptcy and possession claimsPossession claims and bankruptcyHarlow DC v Hallbankruptcy and possession claims:breach of obligations as ground for possessionCadogan Estates Ltd v McMahonbankruptcy and possession claims:enforcement, suspension ofHarlow DC v Hallbankruptcy and possession claims:mortgage possession proceedingsNationwide Building Society v Purvisbankruptcy and possession claims:security of tenurePossession claims and bankruptcyHarlow DC v Hallbankruptcy and possession claims:standingNationwide Building Society v Purvisbankruptcy and possession claims:suspended possession ordersHarlow DC v Hallbarking dogsBudd v Colchester BCbasementsGrosvenor Estates Belgravia v Cochranbathrooms, lights inSymons v Warrenbed and breakfast:all homeless households in B&Bs, policy of bookingR v Newham LBC ex p Ojuri (No 3)bed and breakfast:children or pregnant womenSuitability and out of area placementsbed and breakfast:damages for spending time in B&BsOgle v Bundhoobed and breakfast:dwelling, as not being aR v Newham LBC ex p Ojuri (No 5)bed and breakfast:gypsiesCodona v Mid-Bedfordshire DCbed and breakfast:harassment and illegal eviction, damages forOgle v Bundhoobed and breakfast:individual needs, consideration ofR v Newham LBC ex p Ojuri (No 3)bed and breakfast:pregnant womenOrejudos v Kensington and Chelsea RLBCbed and breakfast:private and family life and home, right to respect forOrejudos v Kensington and Chelsea RLBCbed and breakfast:signing in rules, refusal to comply withOrejudos v Kensington and Chelsea RLBCbed and breakfast:suitabilitySuitability and out of area placementsCodona v Mid-Bedfordshire DCR v Newham LBC ex p Ojuri (No 3)bed linen, laundry ofNelson Developments Ltd v Taboadablanket same day policiesR (Khazai) v Birmingham CCboard and attendance :amount of boardOtter v Normanboard and attendance :assured tenanciesBoard and attendanceboard and attendance :breakfast:other houses, provision inRita Dale v Adrahill Ltdboard and attendance :contrivancesOtter v Normanboard and attendance :daily cleaningNelson Developments Ltd v Taboadaboard and attendance :de minimis requirementOtter v Normanboard and attendance :security of tenureBoard and attendanceOtter v NormanNelson Developments Ltd v TaboadaRita Dale v Adrahill Ltdboard and attendance :weekly laundry of bed linenNelson Developments Ltd v Taboadaboilers, breakdown ofFakhari v Newmanbreach of obligations as ground for possessionBreach of obligationbreach of obligations as ground for possession:assured tenanciesBreach of obligationBreach of obligation (Housing Act 1988 Sch 2 Ground 12)Pollards Hill HA v MarshSanctuary Housing Association v Baker (No 2)breach of obligations as ground for possession:bankruptcyCadogan Estates Ltd v McMahonbreach of obligations as ground for possession:business user, definition ofFlorent v Horezbreach of obligations as ground for possession:caravan parking, policy regardingBarking and Dagenham LBC v Hyatt and Hyattbreach of statutory dutyProtection from Eviction Act 1977 (civil provisions)break clausesAylward v Fawazbreakfast, providing:other houses, provision inRita Dale v Adrahill Ltdbuilding works:builders, liability of landlords asRimmer v Liverpool CCTargett v Torfaen BCbuilding works:disrepairLambert v Barratt Homes Ltd and Rochdale MBCD & F Estates Ltd v Church Commissionersbuilding works:harassment and illegal eviction, damages forAbbas v Iqbalbuilding works:major building works amounting to nuisanceGuppys (Bridport) Ltd v Brooklingbuilding works:notice seeking possessionWaltham Forest LBC v Englandbuilding works:nuisanceLambert v Barratt Homes Ltd and Rochdale MBCbuilding works:purpose built, sufficient degree to render flatsBarnes v Goresuchbuilding works:subcontractorsD & F Estates Ltd v Church Commissionersburglary due to failure to repair front doors, landlords liable forMarshall v Rubypoint Ltdburns from hot pipesBoateng v Camden LBCburst pipesPassley v Wandsworth LBCbusiness tenancies:assured shorthold tenanciesAndrews v Brewerbusiness tenancies:business user, definition ofFlorent v Horezbusiness tenancies:company letsCompany letsEaton Square Properties Ltd v O’HigginsEstavest Investments Ltd v Commercial Express Travel LtdHilton v Plustitle LtdKaye v Massbetter Ltd and KanterNavinter SA v Pastollbusiness tenancies:incidental, where business merelyGurton v ParrottWright v Mortimerbusiness tenancies:lodgers, taking inLewis v Weldcrest Ltdbusiness tenancies:mixed business/residential useWagle v Trustees of Henry Smith’s Charity Kensington EstateWebb v Barnet LBCPirabakaran v Patelbusiness tenancies:non-use of business partPulleng v Curranbusiness tenancies:part of premises, occupation ofBroadway Investments Hackney Ltd v GrantPulleng v Curranbusiness tenancies:reason for occupying premises, business notWright v Mortimerbusiness tenancies:Rent Act tenanciesWright v Mortimerbusiness tenancies:security of tenureBusiness tenancies (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 11, Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 4 and Rent Act 1977 s24)Broadway Investments Hackney Ltd v GrantCheryl Investments Ltd v SaldanhaGurton v ParrottLewis v Weldcrest LtdPulleng v CurranTan v SitkowskiWagle v Trustees of Henry Smith’s Charity Kensington EstateWright v Mortimerbusiness tenancies:separate dwelling, let as aAndrews v BrewerTomkins v Basildon DCWebb v Barnet LBCbusiness tenancies:significant purpose of occupation, business must beCheryl Investments Ltd v Saldanhabusiness tenancies:unilateral acts of tenantsWagle v Trustees of Henry Smith’s Charity Kensington Estatebusiness tenancies:variation to housing tenancies when terminatedTomkins v Basildon DCbusiness user:covenants against business useCaradon DC v Patonbusiness user:definition D6,3Florent v Horezbusiness ventures, loss of home due to failedR v Exeter CC ex p Trancklecannabis, possession ofAbrahams v Wilsoncaravans:breach of obligations as ground for possessionBarking and Dagenham LBC v Hyatt and Hyattcaravans:homelessnessHiggs v Brighton and Hove CCSteward v Kingston upon Thames RLBCcaravans:parking policyBarking and Dagenham LBC v Hyatt and Hyattcaravans:separate dwelling, let as aR v Rent Officer of Nottinghamshire Registration Area ex p Allencaravans:unauthorised sites, onSteward v Kingston upon Thames RLBCcare leavers convicted of criminal offencesGreenwich LBC v GrogancarersHildebrand v MoonAli v Camden LBCcase statedLiverpool CC v Worthingtoncats, having a large number ofHarlow DC v Sewellcattle from land, removal ofBristol & West Investments plc v Tompkinscausation:chain of causation, breaking theR v Hackney LBC ex p Ajayicausation:compensationDavenport v Walsall MBCcausation:intentional homelessnessCausation and settled accommodationBratton v Croydon LBCDenton v Southwark LBCDyson v Kerrier DCKnight v Vale Royal BCMinchin v Sheffield CCMohamed v Westminster CCR v Gloucester CC ex p MilesSteward v Kingston upon Thames RLBCStewart v Lambeth LBCWatchman v Ipswich BCR v Basingstoke and Deane BC ex p BassettR v Croydon LBC ex p EasomR v Hackney LBC ex p AjayiR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p PR v Hounslow LBC ex p RR v Merton LBC ex p RuffleR v Newham LBC ex p CampbellR v Shrewsbury and Atcham BC ex p GriffithsR v Westminster CC ex p ReidR v Kyle and Carrick DC ex p Robsoncausation:rent arrearsBratton v Croydon LBCcausation:settled accommodationCausation and settled accommodationBratton v Croydon LBCDenton v Southwark LBCDyson v Kerrier DCKnight v Vale Royal BCMinchin v Sheffield CCMohamed v Westminster CCR v Gloucester CC ex p MilesSteward v Kingston upon Thames RLBCStewart v Lambeth LBCWatchman v Ipswich BCR v Basingstoke and Deane BC ex p BassettR v Croydon LBC ex p EasomR v Hackney LBC ex p AjayiR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p PR v Hounslow LBC ex p RR v Merton LBC ex p RuffleR v Newham LBC ex p CampbellR v Shrewsbury and Atcham BC ex p GriffithsR v Westminster CC ex p ReidR v Kyle and Carrick DC ex p RobsonChagos IslandersR (Antoine) v Reigate and Banstead DC and First Secretary of StatechaletsNutt v Readchange in circumstances:homelessnessRepeat/fresh applicationsTower Hamlets LBC v Begum (Rikha)Ali v Camden LBCchange in circumstances:material changes of circumstances testRepeat/fresh applicationsTower Hamlets LBC v Begum (Rikha)Ali v Camden LBCchange in circumstances:service charges and long leasesPole Properties Ltd v Feinbergchange in circumstances:suspension of possession ordersUjima Housing Association v Smithcharging ordersCroydon (Unique) Ltd v Wrightcheques as conditional rent paymentsDay v Coltranechildren, inability to controlKensington and Chelsea RLBC v Simmondschildren, inability to control:conduct does not have to take place in dwelling housesNorthampton BC v Lovattchildren, inability to control:discretionary groundsBreach of obligationchildren, inability to control:facts without fact-finding exercise, preliminary issues determined onSouthwark LBC v O’Sullivanchildren, inability to control:fairnessCamden LBC v McBridechildren, inability to control:faultKensington and Chelsea RLBC v Simmondschildren, inability to control:grounds for possessionBreach of obligationBreach of obligation and anti-social behaviourBarking and Dagenham LBC v Hyatt and Hyattchildren, inability to control:neighbours, definition ofNorthampton BC v Lovattchildren, inability to control:nuisance or annoyanceCamden LBC v McBrideKensington and Chelsea RLBC v SimmondsNorthampton BC v Lovattchildren, inability to control:possession ordersSouthwark LBC v O’SullivanKensington and Chelsea RLBC v SimmondsBreach of obligation and anti-social behaviourBarking and Dagenham LBC v Hyatt and Hyattchildren, inability to control:preliminary issues determined on facts without fact-finding exerciseSouthwark LBC v O’Sullivanchildren, inability to control:racial abuseKensington and Chelsea RLBC v Simmondschildren, inability to control:reasonablenessBreach of obligation and anti-social behaviourBarking and Dagenham LBC v Hyatt and Hyattchildren, inability to control:Rent Act tenanciesBreach of obligationBreach of obligation (Rent Act 1977 Sch 15 Case 1)Cadogan Estates Ltd v McMahonFlorent v Horezchildren, inability to control:res judicata in second possession proceedings, breach as beingSanctuary Housing Association v Baker (No 2)children, inability to control:restrictive grounds in tenancy agreements, landlords bound byPollards Hill HA v Marshchildren, inability to control:secure tenanciesBreach of obligationBreach of obligation (Housing Act 1985 Sch 2 Ground 1)Southwark LBC v O’SullivanCamden LBC v McBrideKensington and Chelsea RLBC v SimmondsNorthampton BC v Lovattchildren, inability to control:subjective determination of breach, fairness ofCamden LBC v McBridechildren, inability to control:suspended possession ordersKensington and Chelsea RLBC v Simmondschildren:16–17 year olds, priority need and16/17-year-oldsR (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBCchildren:age assessmentsAge assessmentschildren:assessment of needsR (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBCchildren:availability of accommodation‘Available’ accommodation: s176Oxford CC v Bullchildren:babies, women withR v Brent LBC ex p YusufR v Newham LBC ex p Dadachildren:bed and breakfastSuitability and out of area placementschildren:blood relatives, succession ofSheffield CC v Wall (No 2)children:breach of obligations as ground for possessionKensington and Chelsea RLBC v Simmondschildren:carers for parents, succession of children who wereHildebrand v Moonchildren:continued occupation, reasonableness ofR v Brent LBC ex p YusufR v Medina BC ex p Deechildren:control children as ground for possession, inability toKensington and Chelsea RLBC v Simmondschildren:coughs and coldsConroy v Hire Token Ltdchildren:de facto childrenBrock v WollamsSefton Holdings Ltd v Cairnschildren:definitionSheffield CC v Wall (No 2)children:dependants, applications fromR v Oldham MBC ex p Garlick; R v Bexley LBC ex p Bentumchildren:disrepair:damagesConroy v Hire Token Ltdchildren:disrepair:injunctionsHooton v Liverpool CCchildren:disrepair:separate causes of actionMurphy and Peers v Stockport MBCchildren:disrepair:threats to welfareHooton v Liverpool CCchildren:disrepair:window locksStevens v Blaenau Gwent CBCchildren:EU nationalsHarrow LBC v IbrahimTeixeira v Lambeth LBCchildren:fosteringSheffield CC v Wallchildren:grant of tenancies to childrenHammersmith and Fulham LBC v Alexander-Davidchildren:homelessness:bed and breakfastSuitability and out of area placementschildren:homelessness:continued occupation, reasonableness ofR v Brent LBC ex p YusufR v Medina BC ex p Deechildren:homelessness:dependents, applications fromR v Oldham MBC ex p Garlick; R v Bexley LBC ex p Bentumchildren:homelessness:eligibilityHarrow LBC v IbrahimTeixeira v Lambeth LBCchildren:homelessness:enquiriesR v Lambeth LBC ex p Walterschildren:homelessness:priority needDependent childrenHolmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBCR v Lambeth LBC ex p Vaglivello16/17-year-oldsR (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBCHolmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBCHolmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBCchildren:illegitimate children, succession ofSheffield CC v Wall (No 2)children:imprisonment of childrenNew Charter Housing (North) Ltd v Ashcroftchildren:indifference to effect of behaviour of childrenManchester CC v Higginschildren:injunctionsHarrow LBC v GHooton v Liverpool CCchildren:intentional homelessnessOxford CC v Bullchildren:medical adviceR v Medina BC ex p Deechildren:medical examinationsR v Lambeth LBC ex p Walterschildren:nuisance and annoyance:imprisonment of childNew Charter Housing (North) Ltd v Ashcroftchildren:nuisance and annoyance:indifference to effect of behaviour of childrenManchester CC v Higginschildren:nuisance and annoyance:racial harassment by childrenWest Kent Housing Association v Davieschildren:nuisance and annoyance:reign of terror by children, outright orders whereNewcastle upon Tyne CC v Morrisonchildren:nuisance and annoyance:remorse, outright orders where tenant shows noManchester CC v Higginschildren:nuisance and annoyance:suspended possession ordersKnowsley Housing Trust v McMullenchildren:part-time with parents, succession when livingSwanbrae Ltd v Elliottchildren:possession ordersKnowsley Housing Trust v McMullenchildren:pregnant women leaving property not suitable for babyR v Brent LBC ex p Yusufchildren:priority needDependent childrenHolmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBCR v Lambeth LBC ex p Vaglivello16/17-year-oldsR (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBCHolmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBCHolmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBCchildren:racial harassment by childrenWest Kent Housing Association v Davieschildren:reign of terror by children, outright orders whereNewcastle upon Tyne CC v Morrisonchildren:remorse, outright orders where tenant shows noManchester CC v Higginschildren:Rent Act tenanciesPortman Registrars v Mohammed Latifchildren:slapping childrenR v Westminster CC ex p Reidchildren:spouses cannot be dependent childrenR v Lambeth LBC ex p Vaglivellochildren:step childrenSheffield CC v Wall (No 2)children:successionSheffield CC v WallSheffield CC v Wall (No 2)Brock v WollamsHildebrand v MoonSefton Holdings Ltd v CairnsSwanbrae Ltd v ElliottPortman Registrars v Mohammed Latifchildren:suspended possession ordersKnowsley Housing Trust v McMullenchildren:window locksStevens v Blaenau Gwent CBCChildren Act services: notice to quitBater v Bater; Bater v Greenwich LBCChildren Act services:homelessness:pending reviews, discretion to accommodateR (Hassan) v Croydon LBCChildren Act services:homelessness:priority needR (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBCChildren Act services:pending reviews, discretion to accommodateR (Hassan) v Croydon LBCChildren Act services:priority needR (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBCChildren Act services:social servicesIntroductionChildren Act 1989 s17Children Act 1989 s20Children Act 1989 s23CChildren Act services:trespassersR v Hillingdon LBC ex p McDonaghclean-ups after repairsMcGreal v WakecleaningNelson Developments Ltd v Taboadaclearance areasLocal authority enforcementclose relationships between strangers, succession andCarega Properties SA v Sharrattcockroach infestation :common partsHabinteg Housing Association v Jamescockroach infestation :compensationOgunlowo v Southwark LBCcockroach infestation :disrepairHabinteg Housing Association v JamesSharpe v Manchester MDCcockroach infestation :Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings underOgunlowo v Southwark LBCcockroach infestation :negligenceSharpe v Manchester MDCcohabitees, succession ofWestminster CC v PeartSuccession to assured tenanciescollusionIntentional homelessnesscommencement of possession proceedingsPatel v SmeatonCamden LBC v MCommencement of proceedingsAlamo Housing Co-operative Ltd v MeredithChesters Accommodation Agency Ltd v AbebreseBarnet Primary Care Trust v XBirmingham CC v Hoseycommencement of possession proceedings:agents, standing ofChesters Accommodation Agency Ltd v Abebresecommencement of possession proceedings:claim forms., issue ofSalford CC v Garnercommencement of possession proceedings:High Court proceedingsBarnet Primary Care Trust v Xcommencement of possession proceedings:introductory tenanciesSalford CC v Garnercommencement of possession proceedings:mental capacity of tenantsCamden LBC v Mcommencement of possession proceedings:notice to quit, service ofAlamo Housing Co-operative Ltd v Meredithcommencement of possession proceedings:setting aside ordersPatel v SmeatonCamden LBC v Mcommencement of possession proceedings:signed, not rubber-stamped, requirement for statements of truth to beBirmingham CC v Hoseycommencement of possession proceedings:standingAlamo Housing Co-operative Ltd v MeredithChesters Accommodation Agency Ltd v Abebresecommencement of possession proceedings:statements of truthBirmingham CC v Hoseycommencement of possession proceedings:subtenantsAlamo Housing Co-operative Ltd v Meredithcommencement of possession proceedings:sufficient interest to evict subtenantsAlamo Housing Co-operative Ltd v Meredithcommencement of possession proceedings:summons sent to tenants, no evidence thatPatel v Smeatoncommittal for contempt:adjournmentsStafford BC v Haynescommittal for contempt:admissionsStafford BC v Haynescommittal for contempt:appealsMedina Housing Association v Connollycommittal for contempt:breaches, orders must set outO’Neill v Murraycommittal for contempt:cattle from land, removal ofBristol & West Investments plc v Tompkinscommittal for contempt:failure of orders to set out what landlords must doParsons v Nasarcommittal for contempt:failure to comply with possession ordersTuohy v Bellcommittal for contempt:harassment and illegal evictionInjunctions against landlordsCommittal against landlordsHowes v HowesO’Neill v MurrayParsons v NasarSaxby v McKinleyWright v Jesscommittal for contempt:imprisonment for not readmitting tenantsSaxby v McKinleycommittal for contempt:Injunctions, breach ofR (James) v HM Prison Birmingham and otherscommittal for contempt:injunctions, breach ofInjunctions against tenants and third partiesBarnet LBC v HurstBirmingham CC v FlattGill v Birmingham City CouncilHillingdon LBC v VijayatungaIslington LBC v DoeyLeicester CC v LewisLonghurst Homes Ltd v KillenManchester CC v McCannManchester CC v WorthingtonMedina Housing Association v ConnollyMiddlesbrough BC v TurnbullNottingham CC v CuttsSandwell MBC v PreeceStafford BC v HaynesTower Hamlets LBC v LongWear Valley DC v RobsonInjunctions against landlordsHowes v HowesO’Neill v MurrayParsons v NasarSaxby v McKinleycommittal for contempt:notice in exceptional circumstances, committal orders withoutWright v Jesscommittal for contempt:notice of hearingsMiddlesbrough BC v Turnbullcommittal for contempt:possession orders, enforcement ofBristol & West Investments plc v TompkinsTuohy v Bellcommittal for contempt:procedural defectsHillingdon LBC v VijayatungaMedina Housing Association v Connollycommittal for contempt:readmit tenants, failure toSaxby v McKinleycommittal for contempt:security of tenureInjunctions against tenants and third partiesBarnet LBC v HurstBirmingham CC v FlattLeicester CC v LewisLonghurst Homes Ltd v KillenManchester CC v McCannManchester CC v WorthingtonMedina Housing Association v ConnollyMiddlesbrough BC v TurnbullNottingham CC v CuttsStafford BC v HaynesTower Hamlets LBC v LongWear Valley DC v Robsoncommittal for contempt:sentencingBarnet LBC v HurstLonghurst Homes Ltd v KillenMiddlesbrough BC v TurnbullNottingham CC v CuttsR (James) v HM Prison Birmingham and othersSandwell MBC v Preececommittal for contempt:service of committal orders, properHowes v Howescommittal for contempt:technical nature, procedural defects of aHillingdon LBC v Vijayatungacommittal for contempt:threats to killNottingham CC v Cuttscommittal for contempt:witnesses, wilful insults toManchester CC v McCanncommon partsGoodrich v PaisnerLiverpool CC v IrwinHabinteg Housing Association v JamesCommunist regime, restoration of property confiscated duringVelikovi v Bulgariacommunity care:community careIntroductioncommunity care:definitionIntroductioncommunity care:destitutionIntroductioncommunity care:social servicesIntroductioncompanies:connected or associated companies, sale toBradford and Bingley plc v RossMortgage Express v Mardnercompanies:landlords, property acquired fromEvans v Engelsoncompanies:mortgage possession proceedingsBradford and Bingley plc v RossMortgage Express v Mardnercompany lets:assured tenanciesCompany letscompany lets:directors or shareholders, where occupiers are neitherNavinter SA v Pastollcompany lets:intention for company to be tenantKaye v Massbetter Ltd and Kantercompany lets:nomineesCompany letscompany lets:rentEstavest Investments Ltd v Commercial Express Travel Ltdcompany lets:Rent Act tenanciesCompany letsEaton Square Properties Ltd v O’HigginsEstavest Investments Ltd v Commercial Express Travel Ltdcompany lets:secure tenanciesCompany letscompany lets:security of tenureCompany letsEaton Square Properties Ltd v O’HigginsEstavest Investments Ltd v Commercial Express Travel LtdHilton v Plustitle LtdKaye v Massbetter Ltd and KanterNavinter SA v Pastollcompany lets:set up company, where tenant is required toHilton v Plustitle Ltdcompany lets:shams:directors or shareholders, where occupiers are neitherNavinter SA v Pastollcompany lets:shams:intention for company to be tenantKaye v Massbetter Ltd and Kantercompany lets:shams:rent, where company pays theEstavest Investments Ltd v Commercial Express Travel Ltdcompany lets:shams:set up company, where tenant is required toHilton v Plustitle Ltdcompany lets:shams:tax advantagesEaton Square Properties Ltd v O’Higginscompany lets:shareholders, where occupiers are notNavinter SA v Pastollcompany lets:tax advantagesEaton Square Properties Ltd v O’Higginscompensation:abatement orders, failure to comply withAshard v Islington LBCcompletion, purchasers let into occupation beforeJones v Miahcondensation:compensationOgunlowo v Southwark LBCcondensation:disrepair, damages forSwitzer v Lawcondensation:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings underCarr v Hackney LBCFarrar v Dover CCPike v Sefton MBCOgunlowo v Southwark LBCPringle v Hackney LBCcondensation:extractor fansSwitzer v Lawcondensation:heatingCarr v Hackney LBCFarrar v Dover CCPike v Sefton MBCcondensation:repairing covenantsQuick v Taff-Ely BCStaves v Leeds CCcondensation:structureQuick v Taff-Ely BCconfidentialityR v Poole BC ex p Cooperconflicts of interestBelchikova v Russiaconsent orders‘Consent orders’Appleton v AspinHounslow LBC v McBridePlaschkes v JonesR v Bloomsbury and Marylebone County Court ex p BlackburneR v Worthing BC ex p BruceSmith v McGoldrickWandsworth LBC v FadayomiR v Birmingham CC ex p FoleyR v Newcastle upon Tyne County Court ex p Thompsonconsent orders:admissionsHounslow LBC v McBrideR v Worthing BC ex p BruceSmith v McGoldrickconsent orders:compensation to tenants, quashing orders despite payments ofR v Bloomsbury and Marylebone County Court ex p Blackburneconsent orders:compromise, setting aside orders made byR v Birmingham CC ex p Foleyconsent orders:like to leave, where tenants have said they wouldPlaschkes v Jonesconsent orders:possession orders‘Consent orders’Appleton v AspinHounslow LBC v McBridePlaschkes v JonesR v Bloomsbury and Marylebone County Court ex p BlackburneR v Worthing BC ex p BruceSmith v McGoldrickWandsworth LBC v FadayomiR v Birmingham CC ex p FoleyR v Newcastle upon Tyne County Court ex p Thompsonconsent orders:prior agreements to leaveAppleton v Aspinconsent orders:proved or admitted, where conditions for making orders notR v Newcastle upon Tyne County Court ex p Thompsonconsent orders:secure tenants, implied admissions that tenants notR v Worthing BC ex p Bruceconsent orders:setting aside applicationsWandsworth LBC v FadayomiR v Birmingham CC ex p FoleyR v Newcastle upon Tyne County Court ex p Thompsonconsent orders:withdrawal of admissions prior to hearingsSmith v McGoldrickconstruction of premises, failure to carry out necessary works inAndrews v Schoolingconsultation:security of tenureHousing management and consultation (secure tenants)consultation:variation of non-rent termsVariation of non-rent terms (secure tenants)Consumer Credit Act 1974 and mortgage possession proceedingsConsumer Credit Act 1974Broadwick Financial Services Ltd v SpencerFirst National Bank v SyedRahman v Sterling Credit LtdSouthern and District Finance plc v BarnesBarclays Bank plc v BrooksCedar Holdings v JenkinsCity Mortgage Corp Ltd v BaptisteConsumer Credit Act 1974 and mortgage possession proceedings:counterclaimsRahman v Sterling Credit LtdCity Mortgage Corp Ltd v BaptisteConsumer Credit Act 1974 and mortgage possession proceedings:defence, time limits andRahman v Sterling Credit LtdConsumer Credit Act 1974 and mortgage possession proceedings:discretionSouthern and District Finance plc v BarnesConsumer Credit Act 1974 and mortgage possession proceedings:extortionate credit bargainBroadwick Financial Services Ltd v SpencerCity Mortgage Corp Ltd v BaptisteConsumer Credit Act 1974 and mortgage possession proceedings:High Court, striking out proceedings inBarclays Bank plc v BrooksConsumer Credit Act 1974 and mortgage possession proceedings:instalments, power to orderFirst National Bank v SyedConsumer Credit Act 1974 and mortgage possession proceedings:interest ratesConsumer Credit Act 1974Cedar Holdings v JenkinsConsumer Credit Act 1974 and mortgage possession proceedings:regulated agreementsConsumer Credit Act 1974Consumer Credit Act 1974 and mortgage possession proceedings:rescheduling rate of paymentConsumer Credit Act 1974Consumer Credit Act 1974 and mortgage possession proceedings:striking outBarclays Bank plc v BrooksConsumer Credit Act 1974 and mortgage possession proceedings:time limitsRahman v Sterling Credit LtdConsumer Credit Act 1974 and mortgage possession proceedings:time ordersConsumer Credit Act 1974Southern and District Finance plc v BarnesCedar Holdings v Jenkinscontra proferentem ruleGilje v Charlegrove Securities LtdBank of Scotland v Ladjadjcontractors, appointment ofLong v Southwark LBCcontributory negligenceDamagesconversionsBarnes v Goresuchcooking facilitiesUratemp Ventures Ltd v CollinsFerguson v JonescostsCostsChurch Commissioners for England v IbrahimHackney LBC v Campbellcosts:access not given to abate nuisanceJones v Walsall MBCcosts:advance noticeTaylor v Walsall and District Property and Investment Cocosts:allocation to trackBirmingham CC v Leecosts:assessment, no formal procedure onR v Southend Stipendiary Magistrate ex p Rochford DCcosts:compensationDavenport v Walsall MBCcosts:disrepairBirmingham CC v LeeConnell v Hackney LBCcosts:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under:access not given to abate nuisanceJones v Walsall MBCcosts:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under:advance noticeTaylor v Walsall and District Property and Investment Cocosts:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under:assessment, no formal procedure onR v Southend Stipendiary Magistrate ex p Rochford DCcosts:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under:compensationDavenport v Walsall MBCcosts:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under:nuisance existing at time of complaintsR v Dudley Magistrates’ Court ex p Holliscosts:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under:quashing costs ordersR v Enfield Justices ex p Whittlecosts:failed on all but one claim, where defendant hadHackney LBC v Campbellcosts:follow the event ruleHackney LBC v Campbellcosts:homelessness decisionsR v Lambeth LBC ex p Wilsoncosts:indemnity costsChurch Commissioners for England v Ibrahimcosts:judicial reviewR v Lambeth LBC ex p Wilsoncosts:nuisance existing at time of complaintsR v Dudley Magistrates’ Court ex p Holliscosts:possession proceedingsCostsChurch Commissioners for England v IbrahimHackney LBC v Campbellcosts:pre-action protocolBirmingham CC v Leecosts:quashing costs ordersR v Enfield Justices ex p Whittlecosts:service charges and long leasesIperion Investments Corporation v Broadwalk House Residents LtdSella House Ltd v MearsPrimeridge Ltd v Jean Muir Ltdcosts:undertakings, breach ofConnell v Hackney LBCcosts:wasted costs ordersR v Lambeth LBC ex p Wilsoncoughs and colds, disrepair causingConroy v Hire Token Ltdcounterclaims:consumer creditRahman v Sterling Credit LtdCity Mortgage Corp Ltd v Baptistecounterclaims:disrepairHenley v BloomIslington LBC v KeaneSet-off and counterclaimcounterclaims:mortgage possession proceedingsRahman v Sterling Credit LtdCity Mortgage Corp Ltd v BaptisteRoyal Bank of Scotland v O’Sheacounterclaims:rent arrearsEtherington v BurtHaringey LBC v Stewartcounterclaims:set-offRoyal Bank of Scotland v O’Sheacounterclaims:time limitsIslington LBC v KeaneRahman v Sterling Credit Ltdcovenants:business use, againstCaradon DC v Patoncovenants:forfeitureCooper v Hendersoncovenants:gas and electricityMcCall v Abeleszcovenants:injunctionsCaradon DC v PatonHampstead and Suburban Properties v Diomedouscovenants:negative covenantsSavva v Housseincovenants:service charges and long leasesHackney LBC v ThompsonMullaney v Maybourne Grange (Croydon) Management Co LtdHolding and Management Ltd v Property Holding and Investment Trust plccovenants:variation of non-rent termsR v Brent LBC ex p Blattcovenants:waiver of past breachesCooper v Hendersoncracks, damages forPierce v Westminster CCcreation of tenanciesCreation of tenanciesMexfield Housing Co-operative Limited v BerrisfordBattersea Churches Housing Trust v HunteHammersmith and Fulham LBC v Alexander-DavidRestormel BC v BuscombeTower Hamlets LBC v AyindeWestminster CC v BassonBroadley v Leeds CCcreation of tenancies:children, grant of tenancies toHammersmith and Fulham LBC v Alexander-Davidcreation of tenancies:conductRestormel BC v Buscombecreation of tenancies:exclusive possessionCreation of tenanciescreation of tenancies:fixed and periodic termsBroadley v Leeds CCcreation of tenancies:inferred, grants of tenanciesTower Hamlets LBC v Ayindecreation of tenancies:intention inferred fromRestormel BC v Buscombecreation of tenancies:invitation to treatBattersea Churches Housing Trust v Huntecreation of tenancies:outside the housing actsMexfield Housing Co-operative Limited v Berrisfordcreation of tenancies:previous tenants have left, grants of tenancies inferred whereTower Hamlets LBC v Ayindecreation of tenancies:rentCreation of tenanciesWestminster CC v Bassoncreation of tenancies:rent books sent in errorWestminster CC v Bassoncreation of tenancies:services, payment of rent withCreation of tenanciescreation of tenancies:subjective intentionRestormel BC v Buscombecreation of tenancies:termCreation of tenanciescreation of tenancies:uncertain termMexfield Housing Co-operative Limited v Berrisfordcreation of tenancies:written agreementsBattersea Churches Housing Trust v Huntecriminal offences:arrestAnti-social behaviourcriminal offences:assaultNaveed v RajaRubio-Manzano v Ace Lettings and Pedonomoucriminal offences:compensation ordersBudd v Colchester BCcriminal offences:drugs convictionsNorth Devon Homes Ltd v BatchelorKnowsley Housing Trust v Prescottcriminal offences:harassment and illegal evictionHousing Act 1988 ss27 and 28criminal offences:interim possession ordersInterim possession orders and removal directionscriminal offences:nuisance and annoyanceRaglan Housing Association Ltd v FaircloughAbrahams v WilsonGreenwich LBC v GroganNorth Devon Homes Ltd v BatchelorWandsworth LBC v Webbcriminal offences:overcrowdingOvercrowdingcriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990Criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 and other ActsBirmingham CC v OakleyBudd v Colchester BCIssa v Hackney LBCR v Bristol CC ex p EverettSFI Group plc v Gosport BCBotross v Hammersmith and Fulham LBCCamden LBC v GunbyCanterbury CC v FerrisCarr v Hackney LBCCunningham v Birmingham CCDavenport v Walsall MBCEast Staffordshire BC v FairlessFarrar v Dover CCGreater London Council v Tower Hamlets LBCHerbert v Lambeth LBCJones v Walsall MBCLeeds v Islington LBCLewisham LBC v HallLiverpool CC v WorthingtonO’Toole v Knowlsley MBCPike v Sefton MBCQuigley v Liverpool Housing TrustR v Birmingham CC ex p Ireland, Baker v Birmingham CC, Hall v Kingston upon Hull CCR v Dudley Magistrates’ Court ex p HollisR v Enfield Justices ex p WhittleR v Highbury Corner Magistrates’ Court ex p EdwardsR v Liverpool Crown Court ex p CookeR v Southend Stipendiary Magistrate ex p Rochford DCR (Anne) v Test Valley BCR (Vella) v Lambeth LBC and London and Quadrant Housing TrustSouthwark LBC v SimpsonTaylor v Walsall and District Property and Investment CoHealth and Safety Executive v HussainOzmus v West Hampstead Housing AssociationAshard v Islington LBCBrown v Brent LBCCrowe v Tower Hamlets LBCOgunlowo v Southwark LBCParry v Walsall MBCPringle v Hackney LBCQueeney v Wolverhampton BCMiddlemast v Hammersmith and Fulham LBCcriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:assessment, no formal procedure onR v Southend Stipendiary Magistrate ex p Rochford DCcriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:compensationDavenport v Walsall MBCcriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:enforcement noticesCriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 and other Actscriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:evidence on noiseLewisham LBC v Hallcriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:expertsSouthwark LBC v Simpsoncriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:failure to carry out worksQueeney v Wolverhampton BCcriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:finesCanterbury CC v FerrisHealth and Safety Executive v HussainQueeney v Wolverhampton BCcriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:gas safety certificates, fines for not havingHealth and Safety Executive v Hussaincriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:guilty pleasDavenport v Walsall MBCcriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:heatingCarr v Hackney LBCFarrar v Dover CCGreater London Council v Tower Hamlets LBCPike v Sefton MBCPringle v Hackney LBCcriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:housing associations as person responsibleOzmus v West Hampstead Housing Associationcriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:likelihood of illnessR v Bristol CC ex p Everettcriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:noiseLewisham LBC v HallR (Vella) v Lambeth LBC and London and Quadrant Housing Trustcriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:noticeLeeds v Islington LBCR v Birmingham CC ex p Ireland, Baker v Birmingham CC, Hall v Kingston upon Hull CCR v Liverpool Crown Court ex p CookeTaylor v Walsall and District Property and Investment Cocriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:nuisance:abatement noticesBudd v Colchester BCcriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:nuisance:access not given to abate nuisanceJones v Walsall MBCcriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:nuisance:barking dogsBudd v Colchester BCcriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:nuisance:costsR v Dudley Magistrates’ Court ex p Holliscriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:nuisance:noise, acoustic evidence onLewisham LBC v Hallcriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:nuisance:statutoryCriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 and other ActsCunningham v Birmingham CCFarrar v Dover CCGreater London Council v Tower Hamlets LBCcriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:nuisance existing at time of complaintsR v Dudley Magistrates’ Court ex p Holliscriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:prejudicial to healthCriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 and other ActsBirmingham CC v OakleyR v Bristol CC ex p EverettSFI Group plc v Gosport BCO’Toole v Knowlsley MBCR (Vella) v Lambeth LBC and London and Quadrant Housing TrustSouthwark LBC v Simpsoncriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:quashing costs ordersR v Enfield Justices ex p Whittlecriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:recur, whether nuisance likely toSFI Group plc v Gosport BCcriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:refusal to move out, defence whereQuigley v Liverpool Housing Trustcriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:remedial worksCriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 and other Actscriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:rentCamden LBC v Gunbycriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:rooms, arrangement ofBirmingham CC v Oakleycriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:service of noticeLeeds v Islington LBCcriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:settlement in criminal proceedingsMiddlemast v Hammersmith and Fulham LBCcriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:sound insulation, lack ofR (Vella) v Lambeth LBC and London and Quadrant Housing Trustcriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:specification of worksEast Staffordshire BC v Fairlesscriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:statutory nuisanceCriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 and other ActsCunningham v Birmingham CCEast Staffordshire BC v FairlessFarrar v Dover CCGreater London Council v Tower Hamlets LBCcriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:surveyorsSouthwark LBC v Simpsoncriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:time limitsLiverpool CC v Worthingtoncriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:toilets next to kitchensBirmingham CC v Oakleycriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:vexatious to issue summons as well as civil proceedingsR v Highbury Corner Magistrates’ Court ex p Edwardscriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:works:adjournments for worksR v Dudley Magistrates’ Court ex p Holliscriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:works:fines for failure to carry out worksParry v Walsall MBCcriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 :abatement noticesBudd v Colchester BCR v Bristol CC ex p EverettSFI Group plc v Gosport BCCanterbury CC v FerrisR (Anne) v Test Valley BCcriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 :abatement ordersAshard v Islington LBCcriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 :access not given to abate nuisanceJones v Walsall MBCcriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 :accidents, risk ofR v Bristol CC ex p Everettcriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 :acoustic evidence on noiseLewisham LBC v Hallcriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 :adjournments to allow works to be doneR v Dudley Magistrates’ Court ex p Holliscriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 :anxiety and stress, compensation forBrown v Brent LBCcriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 :background heatingPringle v Hackney LBCcriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 :barking dogsBudd v Colchester BCcriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 :case statedLiverpool CC v Worthingtoncriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 :civil proceedingsIssa v Hackney LBCMiddlemast v Hammersmith and Fulham LBCcriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 :clerks of local authorities, service of notices onLeeds v Islington LBCR v Birmingham CC ex p Ireland, Baker v Birmingham CC, Hall v Kingston upon Hull CCcriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 :cockroach infestationOgunlowo v Southwark LBCcriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 :compensationCriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 and other ActsBudd v Colchester BCBotross v Hammersmith and Fulham LBCDavenport v Walsall MBCHerbert v Lambeth LBCR v Liverpool Crown Court ex p CookeAshard v Islington LBCBrown v Brent LBCOgunlowo v Southwark LBCcriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 :compensation ordersBudd v Colchester BCcriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 :condensationCarr v Hackney LBCFarrar v Dover CCPike v Sefton MBCOgunlowo v Southwark LBCPringle v Hackney LBCcriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 :contingency fees:access not given to abate nuisanceJones v Walsall MBCcriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 :contingency fees:advance noticeTaylor v Walsall and District Property and Investment Cocurtilage of buildings held for other purposes, withinEmployees (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 2)daily cleaningNelson Developments Ltd v TaboadadamagesAnufrijeva v Southwark LBCR (Bernard) v Enfield LBCdamages:apologise, failure toR (Bernard) v Enfield LBCdamages:counterclaimsTelevantos v McCullochdamages:delayAnufrijeva v Southwark LBCdamages:discomfort and distressWallace v Manchester CCdamages:homelessnessR v Northavon DC ex p Palmerdamages:hotel roomsMehta v Royal Bank of Scotlanddamages:injunctionsSouthwark LBC v Storriedamages:maladministrationAnufrijeva v Southwark LBCdamages:mesne profitsMesne profitsSwordheath Properties Ltd v Tabetdamages:mitigationWandsworth LBC v Osei-Bonsudamages:private and family life and home, right to respect forAnufrijeva v Southwark LBCR (Bernard) v Enfield LBCdamages:set-offDamagesAhmed v Southwark LBCBerryman v Hounslow LBCBrent LBC v Carmel (sued as Murphy)Calabar Properties Ltd v StitcherChiodi v De MarneyDavies v PetersonEzekiel v McDadeIrontrain Investments Ltd v AnsariLavimizadeh v Lambeth LBCLubren v Lambeth LBCMarshall v Rubypoint LtdMcGreal v WakeEdlington Properties Ltd v Fenner & Co LtdFilross Securities v MidgeleyMaunder Taylor v BlaquiereMuscat v SmithKaur v GillNwokorie v Masondamages:suitability of accommodationR v Ealing LBC ex p ParkinsonR (Morris) v Newham LBCR (Bernard) v Enfield LBCdampness:damagesLambeth LBC v MartinLewis v CourtneyOgefere v Islington LBCThornton and Jarrett v Birmingham CCdampness:damp-proof coursesEyre v McCrackenWainwright v Leeds CCdampness:disrepairOnwuama v Ealing LBCBall and Ball v Plymouth CCSouthwark LBC v McIntoshLambeth LBC v MartinLewis v CourtneyOgefere v Islington LBCThornton and Jarrett v Birmingham CCdampness:expertsOnwuama v Ealing LBCdampness:exteriorBall and Ball v Plymouth CCSouthwark LBC v McIntoshdampness:structureBall and Ball v Plymouth CCSouthwark LBC v McIntoshdangerous appliances, fines forHealth and Safety Executive v Hussaindeath of tenants: security of tenureSolihull MBC v HickinKingston upon Thames RLBC v Princedeath of tenants:assured tenanciesDeath of tenantdeath of tenants:date for establishing residence requirement for successionWandsworth LBC v Randalldeath of tenants:grounds for possessionDeath of tenantShepping v OsadaWandsworth LBC v Randalldeath of tenants:secure tenanciesDeath of tenantWandsworth LBC v Randalldeath of tenants:security of tenureSuccession to secure tenanciesAustin v Southwark LBCBirmingham CC v WalkerWaltham Forest LBC v ThomasBassetlaw DC v RenshawBrent LBC v FofanaEpping Forest DC v PomphrettIslington LBC v FreemanMarsh v Lewisham LBCMichalak v Wandsworth LBCNewham LBC v PhillipsNewham LBC v RiaPeabody Donation Fund Governors v GrantSheffield CC v WallSheffield CC v Wall (No 2)Westminster CC v PeartSharp v Brent LBCdeath of tenants:service of section 8 notices not proceedings for possessionShepping v Osadadeath of tenants:under-occupationDeath of tenantdeath threatsR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p PR v Westminster CC ex p Iqbaldeception, homelessness andR v Southwark LBC ex p DagouDefective Premises Act 1972Defective Premises Act 1972Defective Premises Act 1972:access/entry, right ofMcAuley v Bristol CCWadsworth v NagleDefective Premises Act 1972:constructing premises, failure to carry out necessary works whenAndrews v SchoolingDefective Premises Act 1972:damage to propertyDefective Premises Act 1972Defective Premises Act 1972:disrepairDefective Premises Act 1972Defective Premises Act 1972:duty of careDefective Premises Act 1972Defective Premises Act 1972:extension of time limitsAlderson v Beetham Organisation LtdDefective Premises Act 1972:falls from patiosSmith v Bradford MDCDefective Premises Act 1972:fitness for human habitationMcMinn Bole and Van Den Haak v Huntsbuild Ltd and Richard Money (t/a Richard Money Associates)Defective Premises Act 1972:foundations, stability ofMcMinn Bole and Van Den Haak v Huntsbuild Ltd and Richard Money (t/a Richard Money Associates)Defective Premises Act 1972:garden steps, defects inMcAuley v Bristol CCDefective Premises Act 1972:inspectionsMorley v Knowsley BCClarke v Taff Ely BCDefective Premises Act 1972:knowledgeMorley v Knowsley BCDefective Premises Act 1972:maintenanceAlker v Collingwood Housing AssociationDefective Premises Act 1972:notice, actual or constructiveSykes v HarryDefective Premises Act 1972:paving slabs leaning uprightBoldack (minor) v East Lindsey DCDefective Premises Act 1972:personal injuryDefective Premises Act 1972Defective Premises Act 1972:pipes, burns caused by hotBoateng v Camden LBCDefective Premises Act 1972:reasonable careDefective Premises Act 1972Defective Premises Act 1972:rectify damage, works undertaken toAlderson v Beetham Organisation LtdDefective Premises Act 1972:safe, keeping propertyAlker v Collingwood Housing AssociationDefective Premises Act 1972:steps, defects in gardenMcAuley v Bristol CCDefective Premises Act 1972:time limitsAlderson v Beetham Organisation LtdDefective Premises Act 1972:windows, standards at time of installation andAdams v Rhymney Valley DCdelay:asserting right to accommodation, delay inVyrovyy v Ukrainedelay:damagesAnufrijeva v Southwark LBCdelay:disrepairNotice and delay in carrying out repairsMorris v Liverpool CCdelay:enforcementPalumbo v Italydelay:evictionPanteleeva v Ukrainedelay:fair hearing, right to aAnderson v UKTsfayo v UKVyrovyy v UkraineWaltoś and Pawlicz v Polanddelay:fair hearing, right to a:asserting right to accommodation, delay inVyrovyy v Ukrainedelay:fair hearing, right to a:complexityAnderson v UKdelay:fair hearing, right to a:enforcementPalumbo v Italydelay:fair hearing, right to a:evictionPanteleeva v Ukrainedelay:fair hearing, right to a:Housing Benefit Review BoardTsfayo v UKdelay:fair hearing, right to a:length of proceedingsAnderson v UKdelay:fair hearing, right to a:possession ordersPalumbo v ItalyPanteleeva v Ukrainedelay:fair hearing, right to a:reasonsTsfayo v UKdelay:files, providing copies of housingGoodger v Ealing LBCdelay:homelessnessR (Bantamagbari) v Westminster CC and Southwark LBCR v Brent LBC ex p MiyangerGoodger v Ealing LBCR (C) v Lewisham LBCdelay:Housing Benefit Review BoardTsfayo v UKdelay:length of proceedingsAnderson v UKdelay:local connection and referral, delay in decisions onR (Bantamagbari) v Westminster CC and Southwark LBCdelay:possession ordersPalumbo v ItalyPanteleeva v UkraineTower Hamlets LBC v AbadieSouthwark LBC v Sarfodelay:private and family life and home, right to respect forAnufrijeva v Southwark LBCdelay:reasonsTsfayo v UKdemolition:demolished, age and character of premises such that it should beNewham LBC v Pateldemolition:demolition or redevelopment, property required forTemporary use pending development (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 3)Attley v Cherwell DCHyde Housing Association Ltd v HarrisonLillieshall Road Housing Co-operative Ltd v BrennanProperty required for demolition or redevelopmentWansbeck DC v MarleySugarwhite v Afrididemolition:demolition ordersLocal authority enforcementNoble v South Herefordshire DCdemoted tenanciesManchester CC v Pinnockdemoted tenancies:necessary in a democratic societyManchester CC v Pinnockdemoted tenancies:private and family life, right to respect forManchester CC v Pinnockdeposits:assured shorthold tenanciesTenancy deposits and the Housing Act 2004UK Housing Alliance (North West) Ltd v FrancisDraycott and Draycott v Hannells Letting Limiteddeposits:authorised schemesTenancy deposits and the Housing Act 2004deposits:Housing Act 2004Tenancy deposits and the Housing Act 2004UK Housing Alliance (North West) Ltd v FrancisDraycott and Draycott v Hannells Letting Limiteddeposits:letting agents, claims againstDraycott and Draycott v Hannells Letting Limiteddeposits:prescribed information, provision ofTenancy deposits and the Housing Act 2004deposits:purchase price not a deposit, payment of 30% ofUK Housing Alliance (North West) Ltd v Francisdeposits:section 21 notices, effect onTenancy deposits and the Housing Act 2004deposits:time limitsDraycott and Draycott v Hannells Letting LimiteddepressionMcCarthy v KhoslaSmyth v Farnworthdesign defectsStent v Monmouth DCRimmer v Liverpool CCTargett v Torfaen BCdestitution:asylum seekers:National Assistance Act 1948Introductiondestitution:community careIntroductiondestitution:National Assistance Act 1948:asylum seekersIntroductiondevelopment, temporary use pendingTemporary use pending development (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 3)Attley v Cherwell DCHyde Housing Association Ltd v HarrisonLillieshall Road Housing Co-operative Ltd v Brennandiminution in value, damages forDamagesCalabar Properties Ltd v StitcherWallace v Manchester CCdirect paymentsSecond WRVS Housing Society v Blairdisabled persons:adaptationsBoreh v Ealing LBCdisabled persons:carersAli v Camden LBCdisabled persons:disability discriminationEquality Act 2010Pieretti v Enfield LBCdisabled persons:disability living allowanceAli v Camden LBCdisabled persons:Equality Act 2010Equality Act 2010disabled persons:homelessnessPieretti v Enfield LBCBarrett v Southwark LBCdisabled persons:severe disability for benefit purposes, assessment ofMangion v Lewisham LBCdisabled persons:time limits where persons have problems finding solicitorsBarrett v Southwark LBCdisasters, meaning ofNoble v South Herefordshire DCdiscomfort and distress, damages forWallace v Manchester CCdiscretion:allocationGeneraldiscretion:appealsBrookes v Croydon LBCFrancis v Kensington and Chelsea RLBCLewis v Havering LBCR v Brighton and Hove Council ex p Naciondiscretion:breach of obligations as ground for possessionBreach of obligationdiscretion:breach of obligations as ground for possession:mortgage possession proceedingsSouthern and District Finance plc v Barnesdiscretion:fettering discretionGeneraldiscretion:former employeesFormer employeesdiscretion:homelessnessRowley v Rugby BCdiscretion:homelessness:local connection and referralLocal connection and referralR v East Devon DC ex p Robbdiscretion:interim possession ordersMetropolitan Housing Trust v Ali and Persons UnknownShropshire CC v Wynnediscretion:local connection and referralLocal connection and referralR v East Devon DC ex p Robbdiscretion:mortgage possession proceedingsSouthern and District Finance plc v Barnesdiscretion:notice seeking possessionKelsey Housing Association v KingKnowsley Housing Trust v Revell; Helena Housing Ltd v CurtisMcShane v William Sutton Trustdiscretion:nuisance and annoyanceAnti-social behaviourdiscretion:pending appeals, discretion to accommodateBrookes v Croydon LBCFrancis v Kensington and Chelsea RLBCLewis v Havering LBCR v Brighton and Hove Council ex p Naciondiscretion:pending reviews, accommodationR v Camden LBC ex p MohammedR v Newham LBC ex p LumleyR (Abdi) v Lambeth LBCR (Antoine) v Reigate and Banstead DC and First Secretary of StateR (Araya) v Leeds CCR (Hassan) v Croydon LBCR (Paul-Coker) v Southwark LBCdiscretion:possession ordersIntroduction and general considerationsMetropolitan Housing Trust v Ali and Persons UnknownShropshire CC v WynneDunn v Bradford MDC; Marston v Leeds CCVandermolen v Tomadiscretion:rent arrearsRent arrearsRent arrears (Housing Act 1988 Sch 2 Grounds 8, 10 and 11)Artesian Residential Investments Ltd v BeckBaygreen Properties Ltd v GilBessa Plus v LancasterCapital Prime Plus plc v WillsDay v ColtraneLeadenhall Residential 2 Ltd v StirlingNorth British Housing Association Limited v MatthewsR (Weaver) v London & Quadrant Housing TrustDiab v Countrywide Rentals 1 plcEtherington v BurtMilecastle Housing Ltd v Waltondiscretion:revival of tenanciesDunn v Bradford MDC; Marston v Leeds CCdiscretion:subletting whole of premisesSubletting the whole of premisesdiscretion:suspension of possession ordersMcPhail v Persons UnknownVandermolen v Tomadiscrimination:Article 14, prohibition ofConnors v UKKarner v AustriaKorelc v SloveniaKozak v PolandLarkos v Cyprusdiscrimination:disability discriminationEquality Act 2010Pieretti v Enfield LBCdiscrimination:Equality Act 2010Equality Act 2010discrimination:homelessnessPieretti v Enfield LBCdiscrimination:possession ordersEquality Act 201012Southwark LBC v St Bricediscrimination:public health and environmental protectionBolton MBC v Pateldiscrimination:reasonableness of possession ordersEquality Act 2010discrimination:sexual orientation discriminationGhaidan v Godin-Mendozadiscrimination:successionGhaidan v Godin-Mendozadisrepair, damages forDamagesAhmed v Southwark LBCBerryman v Hounslow LBCBrent LBC v Carmel (sued as Murphy)Calabar Properties Ltd v StitcherChiodi v De MarneyDavies v PetersonEzekiel v McDadeIrontrain Investments Ltd v AnsariLavimizadeh v Lambeth LBCLubren v Lambeth LBCMarshall v Rubypoint LtdMcGreal v WakeMinchburn v PeckMira v Aylmer Square Investments LtdShine v English Churches Housing GroupSturolson and Co v MaurouxWallace v Manchester CCElectricity Supply Nominees Ltd v National Magazine Co LtdAslam v AliConroy v Hire Token LtdFakhari v NewmanFerguson v JonesFestusi Porbeni v Abdellaziz ChaabdissLambeth LBC v MartinLewis v CourtneyLondon & Quadrant Housing Trust v RiemyMcCarthy v KhoslaMurray v KellyMzae v AbigoO’Beirne v Lambeth LBCOgefere v Islington LBCOntas v Pathmeads HAPierce v Westminster CCSarmad v OkelloSmyth v FarnworthSwitzer v LawSymons v WarrenThornton and Jarrett v Birmingham CCVergara v Lambeth LBC and Hyde Southbank Homesdisrepair, damages for:aggravated damagesFestusi Porbeni v Abdellaziz Chaabdissdisrepair, damages for:alternative accommodationLubren v Lambeth LBCMcGreal v Wakedisrepair, damages for:appealsBrent LBC v Carmel (sued as Murphy)Davies v Petersondisrepair, damages for:arbitrationAhmed v Southwark LBCdisrepair, damages for:assessment:17 months tenanciesOntas v Pathmeads HAdisrepair, damages for:assessment:coughs and coldsConroy v Hire Token Ltddisrepair, damages for:assessment:dampnessThornton and Jarrett v Birmingham CCdisrepair, damages for:assessment:diminution in valueWallace v Manchester CCdisrepair, damages for:assessment:discomfortWallace v Manchester CCdisrepair, damages for:assessment:general damagesChiodi v De Marneydisrepair, damages for:assessment:harassmentFestusi Porbeni v Abdellaziz Chaabdissdisrepair, damages for:assessment:mice infestationLondon & Quadrant Housing Trust v Riemydisrepair, damages for:assessment:notices, ignoringFestusi Porbeni v Abdellaziz Chaabdissdisrepair, damages for:assessment:nuisanceVergara v Lambeth LBC and Hyde Southbank Homesdisrepair, damages for:assessment:rentAslam v AliMurray v KellyMzae v Abigodisrepair, damages for:bathrooms, lights inSymons v Warrendisrepair, damages for:boilers, breakdown ofFakhari v Newmandisrepair, damages for:burglary due to failure to repair front doors, landlords liable forMarshall v Rubypoint Ltddisrepair, damages for:children:coughs and coldsConroy v Hire Token Ltddisrepair, damages for:children:personal injuryConroy v Hire Token Ltddisrepair, damages for:clean upMcGreal v Wakedisrepair, damages for:condensationSwitzer v Lawdisrepair, damages for:contributory negligenceDamagesdisrepair, damages for:cooker, lack ofFerguson v Jonesdisrepair, damages for:coughs and coldsConroy v Hire Token Ltddisrepair, damages for:counterclaimsSet-off and counterclaimdisrepair, damages for:cracksPierce v Westminster CCdisrepair, damages for:dampnessLambeth LBC v MartinLewis v CourtneyOgefere v Islington LBCThornton and Jarrett v Birmingham CCdisrepair, damages for:depressionMcCarthy v KhoslaSmyth v Farnworthdisrepair, damages for:diminution in valueDamagesCalabar Properties Ltd v StitcherWallace v Manchester CCdisrepair, damages for:discomfortWallace v Manchester CCdisrepair, damages for:doors, failure to repair frontMarshall v Rubypoint Ltddisrepair, damages for:draughty windowsFakhari v Newmandisrepair, damages for:excessive awardsBrent LBC v Carmel (sued as Murphy)disrepair, damages for:exemplary damagesFestusi Porbeni v Abdellaziz Chaabdissdisrepair, damages for:extractor fansSwitzer v LawSymons v Warrendisrepair, damages for:fair rent, registration ofSturolson and Co v Maurouxdisrepair, damages for:floodingLambeth LBC v Martindisrepair, damages for:foreseeabilityLavimizadeh v Lambeth LBCMira v Aylmer Square Investments Ltddisrepair, damages for:general damagesChiodi v De Marneydisrepair, damages for:harassmentFestusi Porbeni v Abdellaziz ChaabdissArabhalvaei v Rezaeipoordisrepair, damages for:heatingFerguson v JonesSarmad v Okellodisrepair, damages for:hot waterFerguson v JonesSarmad v Okellodisrepair, damages for:housing benefitWallace v Manchester CCdisrepair, damages for:inconvenience and discomfortDamagesdisrepair, damages for:inflationDamagesdisrepair, damages for:joint tenantsO’Beirne v Lambeth LBCdisrepair, damages for:liftsBerryman v Hounslow LBCElectricity Supply Nominees Ltd v National Magazine Co Ltddisrepair, damages for:lightsSymons v Warrendisrepair, damages for:maintenance of liftsBerryman v Hounslow LBCdisrepair, damages for:mice infestationLondon & Quadrant Housing Trust v Riemydisrepair, damages for:mitigationDamagesdisrepair, damages for:nominal damagesDavies v Petersondisrepair, damages for:noticeMinchburn v PeckFestusi Porbeni v Abdellaziz Chaabdissdisrepair, damages for:nuisanceVergara v Lambeth LBC and Hyde Southbank Homesdisrepair, damages for:personal injuryLavimizadeh v Lambeth LBCConroy v Hire Token Ltddisrepair, damages for:quiet enjoyment, covenant ofThornton and Jarrett v Birmingham CCdisrepair, damages for:rat infestation in drainsSarmad v Okellodisrepair, damages for:redecoration after repairsMcGreal v Wakedisrepair, damages for:rent:40% of rentMzae v Abigodisrepair, damages for:rent:50% of rentAslam v Alidisrepair, damages for:rent:assessmentAslam v AliMurray v KellyMzae v Abigodisrepair, damages for:rent:different items based on rentMurray v Kellydisrepair, damages for:rent:exceed rent, damages should notShine v English Churches Housing Groupdisrepair, damages for:rent:fair rent, registration ofSturolson and Co v Maurouxdisrepair, damages for:rent:foreseeable, loss of rent asMira v Aylmer Square Investments Ltddisrepair, damages for:rent:housing benefitWallace v Manchester CCdisrepair, damages for:rent:liftsElectricity Supply Nominees Ltd v National Magazine Co Ltddisrepair, damages for:rent:loss of rental incomeIrontrain Investments Ltd v AnsariMira v Aylmer Square Investments Ltddisrepair, damages for:tariff for disrepairWallace v Manchester CCdisrepair, damages for:temporary accommodation, unsuitableEzekiel v McDadedisrepair, damages for:water:condensation exacerbated by water penetrationSwitzer v Lawdisrepair, damages for:water:dampness from water penetrationLewis v Courtneydisrepair, damages for:water:extractor fansSwitzer v Lawdisrepair, damages for:water:joint tenants separately entitled to damages for water penetrationO’Beirne v Lambeth LBCdisrepair, damages for:windowsLavimizadeh v Lambeth LBCFakhari v Newmandisrepair:abuse, later claims notHenley v Bloomdisrepair:access to premisesEmpson v Fordedisrepair:allocation to trackBirmingham CC v Leedisrepair:assignmentMuscat v Smithdisrepair:banistersWalker v Nottingham CCdisrepair:builders, liability of landlords asRimmer v Liverpool CCTargett v Torfaen BCdisrepair:building worksLambert v Barratt Homes Ltd and Rochdale MBCD & F Estates Ltd v Church Commissionersdisrepair:burst pipesPassley v Wandsworth LBCdisrepair:childrenMurphy and Peers v Stockport MBCStevens v Blaenau Gwent CBCHooton v Liverpool CCdisrepair:cockroach infestationHabinteg Housing Association v JamesSharpe v Manchester MDCdisrepair:common partsHabinteg Housing Association v Jamesdisrepair:contractual liabilityLiability in contractdisrepair:costsBirmingham CC v LeeConnell v Hackney LBCdisrepair:counterclaimsHenley v BloomSet-off and counterclaimTelevantos v McCullochBritish Anzani (Felixstowe) Ltd v International Marine Management (UK) Ltddisrepair:covenants:expressLiability in contractdisrepair:covenants:impliedLiability in contractImplied covenantsLiverpool CC v IrwinSouthwark LBC v Mills; Southwark LBC v Tanner; Baxter v Camden LBCAdami v Lincoln Grange Management LtdBarrett v Lounova (1982) LtdDemetriou v Poolaction LtdGordon and Texeira v Selico Ltd and Select Managements LtdKing v South Northamptonshire DCLee v Leeds CCdisrepair:dampnessOnwuama v Ealing LBCdisrepair:Defective Premises Act 1972Defective Premises Act 1972disrepair:delayNotice and delay in carrying out repairsMorris v Liverpool CCdisrepair:design defects caused by landlordsRimmer v Liverpool CCTargett v Torfaen BCdisrepair:discriminationR (Erskine) v Lambeth LBCdisrepair:doors, delay in securing frontMorris v Liverpool CCdisrepair:duty of careStockley v Knowsley MBCHawkins v Dhawandisrepair:equitable jurisdictionFilross Securities v Midgeleydisrepair:estoppelOnwuama v Ealing LBCdisrepair:exclusion termsConnaught Restaurants Ltd v Indoor Leisure Ltddisrepair:exclusive possessionHunter v Canary Wharf Ltddisrepair:expensesLee-Parker v Izzetdisrepair:expertsOnwuama v Ealing LBCdisrepair:finesConnell v Hackney LBCMullen v Hackney LBCdisrepair:floodingPassley v Wandsworth LBCLambert v Barratt Homes Ltd and Rochdale MBCdisrepair:fresh claimsOnwuama v Ealing LBCdisrepair:frozen pipesStockley v Knowsley MBCdisrepair:grounds for possessionEmpson v Fordedisrepair:inherent defectsTargett v Torfaen BCdisrepair:injunctions:children, threats to welfare ofHooton v Liverpool CCdisrepair:injunctions:exceptional circumstancesParker v Camden LBCdisrepair:injunctions:general principlesRedland Bricks Ltd v Morrisdisrepair:injunctions:interlocutoryRedland Bricks Ltd v MorrisParker v Camden LBCHooton v Liverpool CCdisrepair:injunctions:mandatory injunctionsR v Wandsworth County Court ex p MunnRedland Bricks Ltd v MorrisParker v Camden LBCdisrepair:injunctions:penal notices, endorsement ofR v Wandsworth County Court ex p Munndisrepair:injunctions:serious disrepairHooton v Liverpool CCdisrepair:injunctions:staircases in danger of collapseSheriden v Broadbridgedisrepair:injunctions:urgent casesInterim injunctionsdisrepair:knowledgeNotice and delay in carrying out repairsO’Brien v RobinsonDinefwr BC v JonesStockley v Knowsley MBCdisrepair:letters from solicitors as noticeAl Hassani v Merrigandisrepair:low standard accommodation, liability in negligence forMcNerny v Lambeth LBCdisrepair:managers, appointment ofMaunder Taylor v Blaquieredisrepair:negligence:banistersWalker v Nottingham CCdisrepair:negligence:builders and designers, liability of landlords asRimmer v Liverpool CCTargett v Torfaen BCdisrepair:negligence:building subcontractorsD & F Estates Ltd v Church Commissionersdisrepair:negligence:cockroach infestationSharpe v Manchester MDCdisrepair:negligence:duty of careStockley v Knowsley MBCHawkins v Dhawandisrepair:negligence:low standard accommodationMcNerny v Lambeth LBCdisrepair:negligence:pathsLips v Olderdisrepair:negligence:pipe overflowsHawkins v Dhawandisrepair:noticeNotice and delay in carrying out repairsO’Brien v RobinsonAl Hassani v MerriganBritish Telecommunications plc v Sun Life Assurance Society plcDinefwr BC v JonesHall v HowardMorris v Liverpool CCPassley v Wandsworth LBCSheldon v West Bromwich CorporationLoria v HammerBavage v Southwark LBCdisrepair:notice:floodingPassley v Wandsworth LBCdisrepair:notice:knowledgeNotice and delay in carrying out repairsO’Brien v RobinsonDinefwr BC v Jonesdisrepair:notice:public health and environmental protectionGwynedd CC v GrunshawLocal authority enforcementPollway Nominees Ltd v Croydon LBCR v Cardiff CC ex p CrossR v Mansfield DC ex p Ashfield NomineesR (Erskine) v Lambeth LBCBolton MBC v PatelHanley v Tameside MBCdisrepair:notice:roof not in tenant’s lettings, where defect in water tanks inLoria v Hammerdisrepair:notice:sewage, liability without notice for backsurge inBavage v Southwark LBCdisrepair:notice:solicitors’ lettersAl Hassani v Merrigandisrepair:notice:surveyors’ valuation reports, details of defects inHall v Howarddisrepair:notice:water in old tanks, discolouration ofSheldon v West Bromwich Corporationdisrepair:notice:without notice, liabilityPassley v Wandsworth LBCdisrepair:nuisance:cockroach infestationHabinteg Housing Association v JamesSharpe v Manchester MDCdisrepair:nuisance:exclusive possessionHunter v Canary Wharf Ltddisrepair:nuisance:floodingLambert v Barratt Homes Ltd and Rochdale MBCdisrepair:nuisance:television receptionHunter v Canary Wharf Ltddisrepair:overflowsHawkins v Dhawandisrepair:patch repairs to roofsDame Margaret Hungerford Charity Trustees v BeazeleyMurray v Birmingham CCdisrepair:paths, dangerousLips v Olderdisrepair:penal notices on mandatory injunctions, endorsement ofR v Wandsworth County Court ex p Munndisrepair:personal injury claimsMillington v Islington LBCStevens v Blaenau Gwent CBCdisrepair:pipesPassley v Wandsworth LBCStockley v Knowsley MBCHawkins v Dhawandisrepair:plasterHussein v Mehlmandisrepair:possession:groundsEmpson v Fordedisrepair:possession:ordersEmpson v Fordedisrepair:possession:proceedingsTelevantos v McCullochdisrepair:pre-action protocolBirmingham CC v Leedisrepair:public health and environmental protectionGwynedd CC v GrunshawLocal authority enforcementPollway Nominees Ltd v Croydon LBCR v Cardiff CC ex p CrossR v Mansfield DC ex p Ashfield NomineesR (Erskine) v Lambeth LBCBolton MBC v PatelHanley v Tameside MBCdisrepair:reasonable time for worksNotice and delay in carrying out repairsdisrepair:rentMuscat v SmithBritish Anzani (Felixstowe) Ltd v International Marine Management (UK) LtdLee-Parker v Izzetdisrepair:repudiatory breachHussein v Mehlmandisrepair:res judicataChin v Hackney LBCOnwuama v Ealing LBCdisrepair:roofsDame Margaret Hungerford Charity Trustees v BeazeleyMurray v Birmingham CCLoria v Hammerdisrepair:roots of trees, highway authorities responsible forDelaware Mansions Ltd v City of Westminsterdisrepair:service chargesMullaney v Maybourne Grange (Croydon) Management Co LtdHolding and Management Ltd v Property Holding and Investment Trust plcdisrepair:set-offDamagesAhmed v Southwark LBCBerryman v Hounslow LBCBrent LBC v Carmel (sued as Murphy)Calabar Properties Ltd v StitcherChiodi v De MarneyDavies v PetersonEzekiel v McDadeIrontrain Investments Ltd v AnsariLavimizadeh v Lambeth LBCLubren v Lambeth LBCMarshall v Rubypoint LtdMcGreal v WakeEdlington Properties Ltd v Fenner & Co LtdFilross Securities v MidgeleyMaunder Taylor v BlaquiereMuscat v Smithdisrepair:settlementsChin v Hackney LBCdisrepair:sewage, liability without notice for backsurge inBavage v Southwark LBCdisrepair:specific performanceRainbow Estates v Tokenhold Ltddisrepair:staircases in danger of collapseSheriden v Broadbridgedisrepair:steps, inherently dangerousTargett v Torfaen BCdisrepair:structureHussein v Mehlmandisrepair:subcontractorsD & F Estates Ltd v Church Commissionersdisrepair:successionMuscat v Smithdisrepair:surveyors’ valuation reports as notice, details of defects inHall v Howarddisrepair:television reception, disruption toHunter v Canary Wharf Ltddisrepair:time limitsMillington v Islington LBCFilross Securities v Midgeleydisrepair:tortious liabilityDelaware Mansions Ltd v City of WestminsterHunter v Canary Wharf LtdHabinteg Housing Association v JamesLambert v Barratt Homes Ltd and Rochdale MBCSharpe v Manchester MDCD & F Estates Ltd v Church CommissionersMcNerny v Lambeth LBCRimmer v Liverpool CCStevens v Blaenau Gwent CBCStockley v Knowsley MBCTargett v Torfaen BCLips v OlderWalker v Nottingham CCHawkins v Dhawandisrepair:undertakings to carry out worksCourt orders and undertakings to carry out worksConnell v Hackney LBCMullen v Hackney LBCR v Wandsworth County Court ex p MunnRainbow Estates v Tokenhold Ltddisrepair:unfair contract terms, exclusion clauses andSet-off and counterclaimCody v Philpsdisrepair:urgent cases, injunctions inInterim injunctionsdisrepair:water in old tanks, discolouration ofSheldon v West Bromwich Corporationdisrepair:windowsStevens v Blaenau Gwent CBCdistress, damages forWallace v Manchester CCdogs:barkingBudd v Colchester BCdogs:injunctions against keeping dogsSutton Housing Trust v Lawrencedogs:nuisance and annoyanceSheffield CC v GreenSheffield CC v JepsonBudd v Colchester BCdomestic violenceCamden LBC v MallettMetropolitan Housing Trust v Hadjazidomestic violence:abuse leading to psychological harmYemshaw v Hounslow LBCdomestic violence:continued occupation, reasonableness ofYemshaw v Hounslow LBCBond v Leicester CCR v Croydon LBC ex p TothR v Newham LBC ex p McIlroydomestic violence:damages, mitigation ofWandsworth LBC v Osei-Bonsudomestic violence:dominant cause of departureCamden LBC v Mallettdomestic violence:grounds for possessionCamden LBC v MallettMetropolitan Housing Trust v Hadjazidomestic violence:harassment and illegal eviction, damages forWandsworth LBC v Osei-Bonsudomestic violence:homelessness:continued occupation, reasonableness ofYemshaw v Hounslow LBCBond v Leicester CCR v Croydon LBC ex p TothR v Newham LBC ex p McIlroydomestic violence:homelessness:perverse placement inR v Haringey LBC ex p Karamandomestic violence:homelessness:threatsReasonable to continue to occupy: s175(3)domestic violence:not living together at time, where partiesMetropolitan Housing Trust v Hadjazidomestic violence:notice to quit, requirement to serveR (Hammia) v Wandsworth LBCdomestic violence:police protection, seekingR v Croydon LBC ex p Tothdomestic violence:probability of violenceBond v Leicester CCdomestic violence:psychological harmYemshaw v Hounslow LBCdomestic violence:threatsReasonable to continue to occupy: s175(3)domestic violence:urgent transfers, tenants could have stayedR v Newham LBC ex p McIlroydomestic violence:women’s refugesR v Ealing LBC ex p SidhuBirmingham CC v Ali and Aweys; Moran v Manchester CCdoors:burglary resulting from failure to repair doorsMarshall v Rubypoint Ltddoors:delay in securing front doorsMorris v Liverpool CCdoors:disrepairStent v Monmouth DCMorris v Liverpool CCdrugs:allocationDixon v Wandsworth LBCdrugs:eligible personsDixon v Wandsworth LBCdrugs:homelessnessCrossley v Westminster CCdrugs:nuisance and annoyanceNorth Devon Homes Ltd v BatchelorKnowsley Housing Trust v Prescottdrugs:priority needCrossley v Westminster CCdrugs:suspension of warrants before executionStonebridge HAT v Gabbidondrugs:vulnerable personsCrossley v Westminster CCdwelling, definition ofUratemp Ventures Ltd v CollinsEEA nationals :dependantsZambrano v Office National de l’EmploiEEA nationals :homelessnessZambrano v Office National de l’EmploiR (Burns) v Southwark LBCR (Mohamed) v Harrow LBCEEA nationals :resident permits, refusal ofR (Burns) v Southwark LBCEEA nationals :right to resideZambrano v Office National de l’EmploiR (Mohamed) v Harrow LBCEEA nationals :unemployedR (Mohamed) v Harrow LBCeffective remedy, right to anPanteleeva v Ukraineemployees and employment:exclusive possessionLicences – occupation granted to employeesemployees and employment:factual nexus between occupation and employmentNorris v Checksfieldemployees and employment:farm workers need no longer pay rent, agreements thatFoster v Robinsonemployees and employment:former employeesFormer employeesDuncan v HayWhitbread West Pennines Ltd v Reedyemployees and employment:grounds for possessionFormer employeesDuncan v HayAgricultural employeesFowler v MinchinSpringfield Investments Ltd v Bellemployees and employment:homelessnessR (Mohamed) v Harrow LBCR v Portsmouth CC ex p KnightAw-Aden v Birmingham CCR v Winchester CC ex p AshtonWatchman v Ipswich BCMohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham LBCemployees and employment:implied termsHughes v Greenwich LBCSurrey CC v Lamondemployees and employment:informal arrangementsRoyal Philanthropic Society v Countyemployees and employment:intentional homelessnessR v Winchester CC ex p Ashtonemployees and employment:key-holdersBrent LBC v Charlesemployees and employment:licencesLicences – occupation granted to employeesNorris v ChecksfieldPostcastle Properties v PerridgeRoyal Philanthropic Society v Countyemployees and employment:live in accommodation, requirement toBrent LBC v Charlesemployees and employment:low rent under informal arrangementsRoyal Philanthropic Society v Countyemployees and employment:notice to quit when employment terminatedNorris v Checksfieldemployees and employment:notices for possession, invalidity ofFowler v MinchinSpringfield Investments Ltd v Bellemployees and employment:police, rent and rate free accommodation forHolmes v South Yorkshire Police Authorityemployees and employment:possession:agricultural employeesAgricultural employeesFowler v MinchinSpringfield Investments Ltd v Bellemployees and employment:possession:grounds for possessionLicences – occupation granted to employeesAgricultural employeesFowler v MinchinSpringfield Investments Ltd v Bellemployees and employment:possession:licencesLicences – occupation granted to employeesemployees and employment:possession:notices for possession, invalidity ofFowler v MinchinSpringfield Investments Ltd v Bellemployees and employment:promotion, loss of accommodation due toElvidge v Coventry CCemployees and employment:proximity to workYewbright Properties Ltd v StoneRosemary Estates Ltd v Connollyemployees and employment:rates, free ofHolmes v South Yorkshire Police Authorityemployees and employment:redundancy, relevance ofBrent LBC v Charlesemployees and employment:rentHolmes v South Yorkshire Police Authorityemployees and employment:Rent Act tenanciesLicences – occupation granted to employeesFormer employeesAgricultural employeesemployees and employment:right to buyEmployees (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 2)employees and employment:school caretakersSurrey CC v Lamondemployees and employment:secure tenanciesFormer employeesemployees and employment:security of tenureEmployees (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 2)Hughes v Greenwich LBCBrent LBC v CharlesElvidge v Coventry CCGreenfield v Berkshire CCHolmes v South Yorkshire Police AuthoritySouth Glamorgan CC v GriffithsSurrey CC v LamondGodsmark v Greenwich LBCWragg v Surrey CCemployees and employment:settled accommodationWatchman v Ipswich BCemployees and employment:shamsGodsmark v Greenwich LBCemployees and employment:suitable alternative accommodationYewbright Properties Ltd v StoneRosemary Estates Ltd v Connollyemployees and employment:surrenderFoster v Robinsonemployees and employment:termination of employmentNorris v ChecksfieldPostcastle Properties v Perridgeemployees and employment:termination of requirement to occupy a particular propertyGreenfield v Berkshire CCemployees and employment:trespassersWhitbread West Pennines Ltd v ReedyR v Portsmouth CC ex p Knightemployees and employment:unemployedR (Mohamed) v Harrow LBCemployees and employment:unfair dismissalWhitbread West Pennines Ltd v Reedyemployees and employment:unpaid workMohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham LBCemployees and employment:work in UK, prospects of findingAw-Aden v Birmingham CCemployees and employment:workers, definition ofBarry v Southwark LBCemployees and employment:working holidaysMcHale v Danehamemployees and employment :abroad, accommodation situatedR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Duro-Ramaemployees and employment :agricultural employees:farm workers need no longer pay rent, agreements thatFoster v Robinsonemployees and employment :agricultural employees:grounds for possessionAgricultural employeesFowler v MinchinSpringfield Investments Ltd v Bellemployees and employment :agricultural employees:notices for possession, invalidity ofFowler v MinchinSpringfield Investments Ltd v Bellemployees and employment :agricultural employees:Rent Act tenanciesAgricultural employeesemployees and employment :agricultural employees:surrenderFoster v Robinsonemployees and employment :assured tenanciesLicences – occupation granted to employeesFormer employeesemployees and employment :better performance of reasonsEmployees (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 2)Hughes v Greenwich LBCWragg v Surrey CCemployees and employment :capacity, employment in a differentDuncan v Hayemployees and employment :change of accommodation and landlordsGodsmark v Greenwich LBCemployees and employment :change of ownersPostcastle Properties v Perridgeemployees and employment :circumstances, examination of all theWragg v Surrey CCemployees and employment :compelling reason for implied term that premises occupied for better performance of dutiesHughes v Greenwich LBCemployees and employment :continued occupation, reasonableness ofR v Portsmouth CC ex p Knightemployees and employment :contracts of employmentEmployees (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 2)Brent LBC v CharlesElvidge v Coventry CCemployees and employment :curtilage of building held for mainly non-housing purposes, within theEmployees (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 2)employees and employment :EEA nationalsR (Mohamed) v Harrow LBCendowment mortgagesBank of Scotland v Grimesenforcement noticesCriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 and other Actsenvironmental health officersO’Toole v Knowlsley MBCEquality Act 2010Equality Act 201012Equality Act 2010:rent arrearsRent arrearsEquality Act 2010:suitable alternative accommodationSuitable alternative accommodationerrors :domestic violence, risk ofR v Islington LBC ex p Adigunerrors :homelessnessR v Islington LBC ex p AdigunPorteous v West Dorset DCerrors :licence/tenancy distinctionNutt v Readerrors :local connection and referralR v Islington LBC ex p Adigunerrors :medical evidenceAllison v Wandsworth LBCerrors :notice seeking possessionDudley MBC v Baileyerrors :rent books sent in errorWestminster CC v Bassonerrors :service charges and long leasesUniversities Superannuation Scheme Ltd v Marks & Spencer plcerrors :warrants for possession, setting asideTower Hamlets LBC v Azadestoppel:disrepairOnwuama v Ealing LBCestoppel:farm workers need no longer pay rent, agreements thatFoster v Robinsonestoppel:mortgage possession proceedingsEmery v UCB Bank plcestoppel:promissory estoppelEmery v UCB Bank plcestoppel:rent regulationContour Homes Ltd v Rowenestoppel:repairing covenantsBrikom Investments Ltd v Seafordestoppel:res judicataOnwuama v Ealing LBCestoppel:succession, assurances ofDaejan Properties Ltd v Mahoneyestoppel:surrenderFoster v RobinsonEU nationals :childrenHarrow LBC v IbrahimTeixeira v Lambeth LBCEU nationals :dependentsZambrano v Office National de l’EmploiEU nationals :effective remedy, right to anPanteleeva v UkraineEU nationals :homelessnessEligibilityHarrow LBC v IbrahimTeixeira v Lambeth LBCZambrano v Office National de l’EmploiEU nationals :homelessness:dependentsZambrano v Office National de l’EmploiEU nationals :homelessness:immigration control, persons subject toLekpo-Bozua v Hackney LBCEU nationals :homelessness:parentsHarrow LBC v IbrahimTeixeira v Lambeth LBCEU nationals :homelessness:right to resideHarrow LBC v IbrahimLekpo-Bozua v Hackney LBCEU nationals :homelessness:school age, children ofHarrow LBC v IbrahimTeixeira v Lambeth LBCEU nationals :homelessness:workers, definition ofBarry v Southwark LBCEU nationals :immigration control, persons subject toLekpo-Bozua v Hackney LBCEU nationals :life, right toArticle 2: Right to lifeBudayeva v RussiaEU nationals :necessary in a democratic societyStanková v SlovakiaManchester CC v PinnockEU nationals :parentsHarrow LBC v IbrahimTeixeira v Lambeth LBCEU nationals :positive obligationsBudayeva v RussiaEU nationals :right to resideHarrow LBC v IbrahimLekpo-Bozua v Hackney LBCEU nationals :school age, children ofHarrow LBC v IbrahimTeixeira v Lambeth LBCEU nationals :workers, definition ofBarry v Southwark LBCeviction:conflicts of interestBelchikova v Russiaeviction:delayMirzayev v AzerbaijanPanteleeva v Ukraineeviction:explanations, provision ofOrlić v Croatiaeviction:fair hearing, right to aMirzayev v AzerbaijanPalumbo v ItalyPanteleeva v Ukraineeviction:internally displaced persons, delay in eviction ofMirzayev v Azerbaijaneviction:judicial reviewAdministrative law and human rights defenceseviction:private and family life and home, right to respect for:conflicts of interestBelchikova v Russiaeviction:private and family life and home, right to respect for:explanations, provision ofOrlić v Croatiaevidence:acoustic evidenceLewisham LBC v Hallevidence:acquiescence, intentional homelessness andR v Eastleigh BC ex p Beattie (No 2)R v West Dorset DC ex p Phillipsevidence:alternative accommodation, attempts to findAlexander v Mohamadzadehevidence:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings underLewisham LBC v Hallevidence:expertsOnwuama v Ealing LBCSouthwark LBC v SimpsonHousing Act 1988 ss27 and 28Asghar v AhmedG v Haringey LBCevidence:fresh evidenceLee-Steere v JenningsLeeds and Yorkshire Housing Association v Vertiganevidence:medical evidenceAllison v Wandsworth LBCHijazi v Kensington and Chelsea RLBCevidence:mortgage possession proceedingsHalifax plc v AlexanderCheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Grantevidence:notice to quitWirral MBC v Smithevidence:nuisance and annoyanceAnti-social behaviour (Housing Acts 1985 and 1988)Croydon LBC v MoodyLeeds and Yorkshire Housing Association v Vertiganevidence:overcrowdingHenry Smith’s Charity Trustees v Bartosiak-Jentysevidence:possession orders, setting asideLewisham LBC v Gurbuzevidence:possession proceedings, adjournment ofBrent LBC v AniedobeSpitaliotis v Morganevidence:psychiatric evidenceCroydon LBC v MoodyNoh v Hammersmith and Fulham LBCevidence:rent arrearsLee-Steere v Jenningsevidence:successionMarsh v Lewisham LBCexceptional circumstances:children, priority need andHolmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBCHolmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBCHolmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBCexceptional circumstances:false statementsShrewsbury and Atcham BC v Evansexceptional circumstances:forfeitureSouthern Depot Co Ltd v British Railways Boardexceptional circumstances:homelessnessShrewsbury and Atcham BC v EvansHolmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBCHolmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBCHolmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBCexceptional circumstances:licence/tenancy distinctionSharp v McArthurexceptional circumstances:notice seeking possessionBraintree DC v VincentCamden LBC v Oppongexceptional circumstances:nuisance and annoyanceBristol CC v MousahKnowsley Housing Trust v McMullenexceptional circumstances:out of area placementsR (W) v Sheffield CCexceptional circumstances:owner-occupiers, returningBoyle v Verrallexceptional circumstances:presumption of tenancy, rebuttal ofSharp v McArthurexceptional circumstances:priority needHolmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBCHolmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBCHolmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBCexceptional circumstances:suitability of accommodationR (W) v Sheffield CCexceptional circumstances:suspension of possession ordersKnowsley Housing Trust v McMullenexceptional circumstances:very serious breachesBristol CC v Mousahexceptional circumstances:warrants, notice of seekingKnowsley Housing Trust v McMullenexclusive possession:character of landlord, irrelevance ofBruton v London and Quadrant Housing Trustexclusive possession:cockroach infestationHabinteg Housing Association v JamesSharpe v Manchester MDCexclusive possession:costsCreation of tenanciesexclusive possession:dampnessOnwuama v Ealing LBCexclusive possession:disrepairOnwuama v Ealing LBCHunter v Canary Wharf Ltdexclusive possession:employees, licences forLicences – occupation granted to employeesexclusive possession:hostelsWestminster CC v Clarkeexclusive possession:hotelsBrillouet v Landlessexclusive possession:individual roomsAG Securities v Vaughanexclusive possession:keysAslan v Murphy (No 1)exclusive possession:licences:employeesLicences – occupation granted to employeesexclusive possession:licences:licence/tenancy distinctionBruton v London and Quadrant Housing TrustAslan v Murphy (No 1)Brillouet v LandlessSkipton Building Society v ClaytonNunn v DalrympleAG Securities v Vaughanexclusive possession:licences:separate dwelling, let as aMansfield DC v Langridgeexclusive possession:non-exclusive occupation agreementsThe distinction between tenancies and licences – ‘non-exclusive occupation agreements’AG Securities v VaughanAntoniades v Villiers and Bridgerexclusive possession:reality of exclusive possessionSkipton Building Society v Claytonexclusive possession:rentNunn v DalrympleMansfield DC v Langridgeexclusive possession:roomsAG Securities v Vaughanexclusive possession:separate dwelling, let as aWestminster CC v ClarkeMansfield DC v Langridgeexclusive possession:title of landlord, lack ofBruton v London and Quadrant Housing Trustexclusive possession:trespassersCivil proceedingsexclusive possession:weekly rent, payment ofNunn v Dalrympleexemplary damagesFestusi Porbeni v Abdellaziz Chaabdissexemplary damages:agentsRamdath v Daleyexemplary damages:all elements of compensation, coveringBranchett v Beaneyexemplary damages:assaultNaveed v Rajaexemplary damages:conduct of tenants, relevance ofMcMillan v Singhexemplary damages:disrepairFestusi Porbeni v Abdellaziz Chaabdissexemplary damages:fines in criminal courts, in addition toAsghar v Ahmedexemplary damages:harassment and illegal evictionAsghar v AhmedBranchett v BeaneyDrane v Evangelouexemplary damages:harassment and illegal eviction:agentsRamdath v Daleyexemplary damages:harassment and illegal eviction:all elements of compensation, coveringBranchett v Beaneyexemplary damages:harassment and illegal eviction:assaultNaveed v Rajaexemplary damages:harassment and illegal eviction:conduct of tenants, relevance ofMcMillan v Singhexemplary damages:harassment and illegal eviction:disrepairFestusi Porbeni v Abdellaziz Chaabdissexemplary damages:harassment and illegal eviction:fines in criminal courts, in addition toAsghar v Ahmedexemplary damages:harassment and illegal eviction:higher rent obtained by landlord after evictionKeddey v Hughesexemplary damages:harassment and illegal eviction:motives of landlord, establishingMafo v Adamsexemplary damages:harassment and illegal eviction:vacant possession, eviction for sale withIslam v Yapexemplary damages:harassment and illegal eviction:warnings to landlordsKeddey v Hughesexemplary damages:higher rent obtained by landlord after evictionKeddey v Hughesexemplary damages:motives of landlord, establishingMafo v Adamsexemplary damages:vacant possession, eviction for sale withIslam v Yapexemplary damages:warnings to landlordsKeddey v HughesexpertsOnwuama v Ealing LBCSouthwark LBC v SimpsonHousing Act 1988 ss27 and 28Asghar v AhmedG v Haringey LBCexpropriation:Communist regime, restoration of property confiscated duringVelikovi v Bulgariaexpropriation:compensationVelikovi v Bulgariaexpropriation:good faith, acquisition inVelikovi v Bulgariaexpropriation:proportionalityVelikovi v Bulgariaexpropriation:public health and environmental protectionLocal authority enforcementexpropriation:public interestVelikovi v BulgariaexteriorDouglas-Scott v ScorgieHopwood v Cannock Chase DC (formerly Rugeley UDC)Quick v Taff-Ely BCBall and Ball v Plymouth CCSouthwark LBC v McIntoshBarrett v Lounova (1982) Ltdextortionate credit bargainsBroadwick Financial Services Ltd v SpencerParagon Finance Ltd v Nash; Paragon Finance plc v StauntonCity Mortgage Corp Ltd v Baptisteextractor fansSwitzer v LawSymons v Warrenface to face meetings, right toMakisi v Birmingham CC; Yosief v Birmingham CC; Nagi v Birmingham CCfact-finding role, judges usurping council’sKruja v Enfield LBCfailure of landlord to take action against other occupants:anti-social behaviour of neighboursMitchell v Glasgow CCHussain v Lancaster CCfailure of landlord to take action against other occupants:criminal acts of others, no duty of care of landlords to preventX and Y v Hounslow LBCfailure of landlord to take action against other occupants:duty of care of landlordsMitchell v Glasgow CCX and Y v Hounslow LBCfailure of landlord to take action against other occupants:harassment and illegal evictionLandlord’s failure to take action against other occupantsMitchell v Glasgow CCHussain v Lancaster CCLippiatt v South Gloucestershire CouncilMowan v Wandsworth LBCO’Leary v Islington LBCX and Y v Hounslow LBCfailure of landlord to take action against other occupants:implied terms to enforce terms of another tenancy, noO’Leary v Islington LBCfailure of landlord to take action against other occupants:licensees, nuisance byLippiatt v South Gloucestershire Councilfailure of landlord to take action against other occupants:murder by neighboursMitchell v Glasgow CCfailure of landlord to take action against other occupants:neighboursLandlord’s failure to take action against other occupantsMitchell v Glasgow CCHussain v Lancaster CCfailure of landlord to take action against other occupants:nuisance by tenants, council’s liability forMowan v Wandsworth LBCfailure of landlord to take action against other occupants:ombudsmenLandlord’s failure to take action against other occupantsfailure to evict; breach, Article 1 Protocol 1Scollo v Italyfair hearing, right to aArticle 6: Right to a fair trialAli v UKAnderson v UKKletsova v RussiaMirzayev v AzerbaijanPalumbo v ItalyPanteleeva v UkraineTsfayo v UKVyrovyy v UkraineWaltoś and Pawlicz v Polandfair hearing, right to a:administrative acts without hearings, issue of warrants asSouthwark LBC v St Bricefair hearing, right to a:appealsBegum (Runa) v Tower Hamlets LBCTomlinson v Birmingham CC (Ali v Birmingham CC)fair hearing, right to a:asserting right to accommodation, delay inVyrovyy v Ukrainefair hearing, right to a:delayAnderson v UKTsfayo v UKVyrovyy v UkraineWaltoś and Pawlicz v Polandfair hearing, right to a:delay:asserting right to accommodation, inVyrovyy v Ukrainefair hearing, right to a:delay:complexityAnderson v UKfair hearing, right to a:delay:enforcementPalumbo v Italyfair hearing, right to a:delay:evictionPanteleeva v Ukrainefair hearing, right to a:delay:Housing Benefit Review BoardTsfayo v UKfair hearing, right to a:delay:length of proceedingsAnderson v UKfair hearing, right to a:delay:possession ordersPalumbo v ItalyPanteleeva v Ukrainefair hearing, right to a:delay:reasonsTsfayo v UKfair hearing, right to a:effective remedy, right to anPanteleeva v Ukrainefair hearing, right to a:enforcement of judgments and ordersKletsova v RussiaPalumbo v ItalyPanteleeva v Ukrainefair hearing, right to a:evictionMirzayev v AzerbaijanPalumbo v ItalyPanteleeva v Ukrainefair hearing, right to a:Gypsies and TravellersR (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset Policefair hearing, right to a:homelessnessBegum (Runa) v Tower Hamlets LBCfair hearing, right to a:Housing Benefit Review BoardTsfayo v UKfair hearing, right to a:independenceTsfayo v UKfair hearing, right to a:interim possession ordersR (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset Policefair hearing, right to a:internally displaced persons, delay in eviction ofMirzayev v Azerbaijanfair hearing, right to a:judicial reviewTsfayo v UKBegum (Runa) v Tower Hamlets LBCfair hearing, right to a:length of proceedingsAnderson v UKfair hearing, right to a:occupancy vouchers as possessionsMirzayev v Azerbaijanfair hearing, right to a:omissionsTsfayo v UKfair hearing, right to a:peaceful enjoyment of possessionsMirzayev v Azerbaijanfair hearing, right to a:possession ordersPalumbo v ItalyPanteleeva v UkraineR (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset PoliceSouthwark LBC v St Bricefair hearing, right to a:reasons for delayTsfayo v UKfair hearing, right to a:state, necessity for proceedings againstKletsova v Russiafair rent, registration ofSturolson and Co v Maurouxfalls from patiosSmith v Bradford MDCfalse statements, tenancies obtained by:assignmentIslington LBC v Uckacfalse statements, tenancies obtained by:assured tenanciesTenancy obtained by false statementfalse statements, tenancies obtained by:burden of proof akin to criminal standardWaltham Forest LBC v Robertsfalse statements, tenancies obtained by:exceptional circumstances, consideration of homelessness inShrewsbury and Atcham BC v Evansfalse statements, tenancies obtained by:fraudSouthwark LBC v Erekinfalse statements, tenancies obtained by:grounds for possessionTenancy obtained by false statementIslington LBC v UckacMerton LBC v RichardsWaltham Forest LBC v RobertsTenancy obtained by false statementLewisham LBC v Adeyemi/Lewisham LBC v AkinsolaNorth Herts DC v CarthyRushcliffe BC v WatsonShrewsbury and Atcham BC v EvansSouthwark LBC v Erekinfalse statements, tenancies obtained by:homelessnessLewisham LBC v Adeyemi/Lewisham LBC v AkinsolaRushcliffe BC v WatsonShrewsbury and Atcham BC v Evansfalse statements, tenancies obtained by:misrepresentors, assignment byIslington LBC v Uckacfalse statements, tenancies obtained by:parents had not acted on tenants’ instigation, whereMerton LBC v Richardsfalse statements, tenancies obtained by:possession orders, reasonableness ofTenancy obtained by false statementLewisham LBC v Adeyemi/Lewisham LBC v AkinsolaNorth Herts DC v CarthyRushcliffe BC v WatsonShrewsbury and Atcham BC v EvansSouthwark LBC v Erekinfalse statements, tenancies obtained by:refusal of possessionSouthwark LBC v Erekinfalse statements, tenancies obtained by:secure tenanciesTenancy obtained by false statementLewisham LBC v Adeyemi/Lewisham LBC v AkinsolaNorth Herts DC v CarthyRushcliffe BC v Watsonfalse statements, tenancies obtained by:seriousness of allegationsWaltham Forest LBC v Robertsfamilies:availability of accommodationR v Lambeth LBC ex p Lyfamilies:elsewhere, tenants living withRegalian Securities Ltd v Scheuerfamilies:family court ordersHolmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBCHolmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBCHolmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBCfamilies:homelessnessOzbek v Ipswich BCR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p AvdicR v Camden LBC ex p HersiSuitability and out of area placementsfamilies:intentionErrington v Errington and Woodsfamilies:licence/tenancy distinctionErrington v Errington and WoodsMarcroft Wagons Ltd v SmithMeynell Family Properties Ltd v MeynellNunn v DalrympleWard v Warnkefamilies:local connection and referralOzbek v Ipswich BCR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Avdicfamilies:member of another’s family, definition ofSuccession to secure tenanciesfamilies:member of family, definition ofBrent LBC v FofanaMichalak v Wandsworth LBCfamilies:proximity of accommodation to familySuitability and out of area placementsR (Yumsak) v Enfield LBCfamilies:reasonably expected to reside with applicants, persons who mayR v Lambeth LBC ex p Lyfamilies:rent, payment ofNunn v DalrympleWard v Warnkefamilies:same sex partnersFitzpatrick v Sterling Housing Associationfamilies:staying on of deceased persons’ childrenMarcroft Wagons Ltd v Smithfamilies:strangers, close relationships betweenCarega Properties SA v Sharrattfamilies:strong family flavour to arrangements, where there isMeynell Family Properties Ltd v Meynellfamilies:successionMichalak v Wandsworth LBCCarega Properties SA v SharrattFitzpatrick v Sterling Housing AssociationBrock v WollamsSefton Holdings Ltd v Cairnsfamilies:suitability of accommodationR (Yumsak) v Enfield LBCfinancial circumstances:abroad, accommodation situatedR v Camden LBC ex p Arandafinancial circumstances:homelessnessR v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p Bayanifinancial circumstances:mortgage possession proceedingsPolonski v Lloyds Bank Mortgages Ltdfinancial circumstances:suitable alternative accommodationAmrit Holdings Co Ltd v Shahbakhtifines:abatement noticesCanterbury CC v Ferrisfines:aggravated damagesAsghar v Ahmedfines:daily rateCanterbury CC v FerrisQueeney v Wolverhampton BCfines:dangerous appliancesHealth and Safety Executive v Hussainfines:discretionCanterbury CC v Ferrisfines:disrepairConnell v Hackney LBCMullen v Hackney LBCfines:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings underCanterbury CC v FerrisHealth and Safety Executive v HussainQueeney v Wolverhampton BCfines:exemplary damagesAsghar v Ahmedfines:failure to carry out worksQueeney v Wolverhampton BCfines:gas safety certificates, not havingHealth and Safety Executive v Hussainfire:homelessness and priority needNoble v South Herefordshire DCfire:safety, inadequacy ofR v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p Ben-El-Mabroukfitness for human habitationMcMinn Bole and Van Den Haak v Huntsbuild Ltd and Richard Money (t/a Richard Money Associates)fitness of premises, implied warranties as toSouthwark LBC v Mills; Southwark LBC v Tanner; Baxter v Camden LBCfixed-term tenancies, forfeiture ofForfeitureflooding:building worksLambert v Barratt Homes Ltd and Rochdale MBCflooding:burst pipesPassley v Wandsworth LBCflooding:damagesLambeth LBC v Martinflooding:disrepairPassley v Wandsworth LBCLambert v Barratt Homes Ltd and Rochdale MBCLambeth LBC v Martinflooding:homelessness and priority needNoble v South Herefordshire DCfloors: joistsFincar SRL v 109/113 Mount Street Management Co Ltdfloors:uneven floorsWindever v Liverpool CCforeseeabilityLavimizadeh v Lambeth LBCMira v Aylmer Square Investments LtdforfeitureForfeitureBillson v Residential Apartments LtdAdagio Properties v AnsariBritish Petroleum Pension Trust v BehrendtCentral Estates (Belgravia) Ltd v Woolgar (No 2)Chrisdell Ltd v Johnson and TicknerCooper v HendersonCornillie v Saha and Bradford and Bingley Building SocietyCourtney Lodge Management Ltd v BlakeCroydon (Unique) Ltd v WrightEaton Square Properties Ltd v BeveridgeEscalus Properties Ltd v RobinsonHynes v Twinsectra LtdKhar v Delbounty LtdMaryland Estates v Bar-JosephPatel v K & J Restaurants LtdReichman v BeveridgeSavva v HousseinSinclair Gardens Investments (Kensington) v WalshSmith v SpaulSwordheath Properties Ltd v BoltThomas v Ken Thomas LtdAshton v SobelmanBillson v Residential Apartments Ltd (No 2)Church Commissioners for England v NodjoumiRendham Holdings Ltd v PatelSouthern Depot Co Ltd v British Railways BoardVan Haarlam v Kasner Charitable Trustforfeiture:acceptance of rent, breach waived byCentral Estates (Belgravia) Ltd v Woolgar (No 2)forfeiture:assignmentChurch Commissioners for England v Nodjoumiforfeiture:breach, persons bound to remedySmith v Spaulforfeiture:breach of covenant regarding user waived only for past breachesCooper v Hendersonforfeiture:charging orders to be given notice of possession proceedings, creditors withCroydon (Unique) Ltd v Wrightforfeiture:continuing liability, rent arrears includingMaryland Estates v Bar-Josephforfeiture:date:first hearings, date fixed forSwordheath Properties Ltd v Boltforfeiture:date:relief should be granted, from whichSinclair Gardens Investments (Kensington) v Walshforfeiture:date:return day, meaning ofSwordheath Properties Ltd v Boltforfeiture:defect, particulars of eachAdagio Properties v Ansariforfeiture:definitionForfeitureforfeiture:demands for rent not waiving right to forfeitVan Haarlam v Kasner Charitable Trustforfeiture:dismissed, no need to apply for relief where forfeiture proceedingsHynes v Twinsectra Ltdforfeiture:exceptional circumstancesSouthern Depot Co Ltd v British Railways Boardforfeiture:facts, relief granted on theCentral Estates (Belgravia) Ltd v Woolgar (No 2)forfeiture:first hearings, date fixed forSwordheath Properties Ltd v Boltforfeiture:fixed-term tenancies, termination ofForfeitureforfeiture:mitigation by landlordsReichman v Beveridgeforfeiture:mortgagees, relief available toEscalus Properties Ltd v Robinsonforfeiture:negative covenants as being capable of remedy, breach ofSavva v Housseinforfeiture:notice to creditors of possession proceedingsCroydon (Unique) Ltd v Wrightforfeiture:nuisanceCourtney Lodge Management Ltd v Blakeforfeiture:oppressionRendham Holdings Ltd v Patelforfeiture:past breaches, breach only waived forCooper v Hendersonforfeiture:planning enforcement notices, service ofBillson v Residential Apartments Ltd (No 2)forfeiture:possession proceedings, adjournment ofR v A Circuit Judge (sitting at Norwich County Court) ex p Wathenforfeiture:prostitution, where premises used forBritish Petroleum Pension Trust v Behrendtforfeiture:Protection from Eviction Act 1977, occupant not protected byEaton Square Properties Ltd v Beveridgeforfeiture:re-entry, forfeiture byBillson v Residential Apartments Ltdforfeiture:reliefBillson v Residential Apartments LtdBritish Petroleum Pension Trust v BehrendtCentral Estates (Belgravia) Ltd v Woolgar (No 2)Escalus Properties Ltd v RobinsonHynes v Twinsectra LtdKhar v Delbounty LtdMaryland Estates v Bar-JosephPatel v K & J Restaurants LtdSinclair Gardens Investments (Kensington) v WalshBillson v Residential Apartments Ltd (No 2)Southern Depot Co Ltd v British Railways Boardforfeiture:rent arrearsArtesian Residential Investments Ltd v BeckR v A Circuit Judge (sitting at Norwich County Court) ex p Wathenforfeiture:rent arrears:‘all the rent in arrears’, definition ofMaryland Estates v Bar-Josephforfeiture:rent arrears:assignment, section 146 notice onChurch Commissioners for England v Nodjoumiforfeiture:rent arrears:continuing liability, includingMaryland Estates v Bar-Josephforfeiture:rent arrears:demands for rent not waiving right to forfeitVan Haarlam v Kasner Charitable Trustforfeiture:rent arrears:return rent, waiver where landlord does notThomas v Ken Thomas Ltdforfeiture:rent arrears:section 146 notices, right to forfeit not waived byChurch Commissioners for England v Nodjoumiforfeiture:rent arrears:waiver of breach, payment operating asThomas v Ken Thomas Ltdforfeiture:return day, meaning ofSwordheath Properties Ltd v Boltforfeiture:return rent, waiver where landlord does notThomas v Ken Thomas Ltdforfeiture:section 146 noticesAdagio Properties v AnsariSmith v SpaulChurch Commissioners for England v Nodjoumiforfeiture:serviceSmith v Spaulforfeiture:stay of execution, failure of court to considerRendham Holdings Ltd v Patelforfeiture:subtenantsKeepers and Governors of the Free Grammar School of John Lyon v JamesCornillie v Saha and Bradford and Bingley Building SocietyAshton v Sobelmanforfeiture:time for responding to breachCourtney Lodge Management Ltd v Blakeforfeiture:vacant possession out of proportion to breaches, wherePatel v K & J Restaurants Ltdforfeiture:variation of terms of reliefKhar v Delbounty Ltdforfeiture:waiver of breachCentral Estates (Belgravia) Ltd v Woolgar (No 2)Cooper v HendersonCornillie v Saha and Bradford and Bingley Building SocietyThomas v Ken Thomas LtdChurch Commissioners for England v NodjoumiVan Haarlam v Kasner Charitable Trustformer employeesFormer employeesDuncan v Hayformer employees:assured tenanciesFormer employeesformer employees:capacity, employment in a differentDuncan v Hayformer employees:discretionary groundsFormer employeesformer employees:grounds for possessionFormer employeesDuncan v Hayformer employees:Rent Act tenanciesFormer employeesformer employees:secure tenanciesFormer employeesformer employees:trespassersWhitbread West Pennines Ltd v ReedyfosteringSheffield CC v Wallfoundations, stability ofMcMinn Bole and Van Den Haak v Huntsbuild Ltd and Richard Money (t/a Richard Money Associates)fraud:assignment, consent toSanctuary Housing Association v Bakerfraud:false statementsSouthwark LBC v Erekinfraud:holiday letsKillick v Robertsfraud:homelessnessR v Barnet LBC ex p RughooputhR v Dacorum DC ex p WalshR v Southwark LBC ex p DagouR v Lambeth LBC ex p Wilsonfraud:intentional homelessnessR v Barnet LBC ex p Rughooputhfraud:mortgagesR v Barnet LBC ex p Rughooputhfraud:possession orders, setting asideHammersmith and Fulham LBC v Hillfraud:rescissionKillick v Robertsfraud:warrants for possession, setting asideSetting aside warrants after executionHammersmith and Fulham LBC v Hillfraud:wasted costs ordersR v Lambeth LBC ex p Wilsonfreedom of expression:Article 10Mustafa and Tarzibachi v Swedenfrozen pipesStockley v Knowsley MBCfully mutual co-operative tenanciesAli Bhai and Cabare v Black Roof CHA Ltdgang-related violenceMurray v Chief Constable of Lancashiregardens:deterioration of garden until becoming a tenant, successors not liable forHolloway v Poveygardens:grounds for possessionEnfield LBC v FrenchHolloway v Poveygardens:steps, defects inMcAuley v Bristol CCgardens:weight given to needs of tenantsEnfield LBC v Frenchgas and electricity :harassment and illegal evictionHousing Act 1988 ss27 and 28gas and electricity :high or low rent, tenancies at aBostock v Bryant and Anothergas and electricity :implied covenants to supplyMcCall v Abeleszgas and electricity :Protection from Eviction Act 1977McCall v Abeleszgas and electricity :withdrawal of servicesHousing Act 1988 ss27 and 28gas safety certificatesHealth and Safety Executive v Hussaingatekeeping approachGate-keepingEdwards and others v Birmingham City CouncilR (Anonymous) v Southwark LBCR (Kelly) v Birmingham CCR (Khazai) v Birmingham CCR (Raw) v Lambeth LBCgeneral housing circumstances in area, assessment ofR v Brent LBC ex p BariiseR v Newham LBC ex p Tower Hamlets LBCgood condition, covenants to keep premises inWelsh v Greenwich LBCLee v Leeds CCgood faithVelikovi v BulgariaLewisham LBC v GurbuzDeliberate act or omissionAw-Aden v Birmingham CCF v Birmingham CCGibbons v Bury MBCHobbs v Sutton LBCO’Connor v Kensington and Chelsea RLBCR v Barnet LBC ex p RughooputhR v Exeter CC ex p TranckleR v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p RoufR v Wandsworth LBC ex p OnwudiweR v Winchester CC ex p AshtonR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Lusi and LusiR v Mole Valley DC ex p BurtonR v Wandsworth LBC ex p RoseR v Westminster CC ex p Obeidgovernment departmentsR v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food ex p Callaghanground rentStatutory regulation of ground rent, service and administration chargesgrounds for possessionIntroductiongrounds for possession:agricultural employeesAgricultural employeesFowler v MinchinSpringfield Investments Ltd v Bellgrounds for possession:appealsBracknell Forest BC v Greengrounds for possession:assured shorthold tenanciesIntroductiongrounds for possession:assured tenanciesIntroductionRent arrearsRent arrears (Housing Act 1988 Sch 2 Grounds 8, 10 and 11)Artesian Residential Investments Ltd v BeckBaygreen Properties Ltd v GilBessa Plus v LancasterCapital Prime Plus plc v WillsDay v ColtraneLeadenhall Residential 2 Ltd v StirlingNorth British Housing Association Limited v MatthewsR (Weaver) v London & Quadrant Housing TrustDiab v Countrywide Rentals 1 plcEtherington v BurtMilecastle Housing Ltd v Waltongrounds for possession:breach of obligationsBreach of obligationBreach of obligation and anti-social behaviourBarking and Dagenham LBC v Hyatt and Hyattgrounds for possession:Court of Appeal, role ofBracknell Forest BC v Greengrounds for possession:death of tenantsDeath of tenantShepping v OsadaWandsworth LBC v Randallgrounds for possession:degree, weight given to tenant’s needs as a matter ofEnfield LBC v Frenchgrounds for possession:demolition or redevelopment, property required forProperty required for demolition or redevelopmentWansbeck DC v MarleySugarwhite v Afridigrounds for possession:deterioration of garden until becoming a tenant, successors not liable forHolloway v Poveygrounds for possession:domestic violenceCamden LBC v MallettMetropolitan Housing Trust v Hadjazigrounds for possession:employees, licences forLicences – occupation granted to employeesgrounds for possession:false statementsTenancy obtained by false statementIslington LBC v UckacMerton LBC v RichardsWaltham Forest LBC v RobertsTenancy obtained by false statementLewisham LBC v Adeyemi/Lewisham LBC v AkinsolaNorth Herts DC v CarthyRushcliffe BC v WatsonShrewsbury and Atcham BC v EvansSouthwark LBC v Erekingrounds for possession:former employeesFormer employeesDuncan v Haygrounds for possession:gardensEnfield LBC v FrenchHolloway v Poveygrounds for possession:landlords or members of family, premises required forPremises required for landlord or member of family (Rent Act 1977 Sch 15 Case 9)Alexander v MohamadzadehAmaddio v DaltonBaker v MacIverBassett v FraserBostock v Tacher de la PagerieCoombes v ParryEvans v EngelsonGhelani v BowieHodges v BleeKidder v BirchManaton v EdwardsMansukhani v Sharkeygrounds for possession:licencesLicences – occupation granted to employeesgrounds for possession:notice seeking possessionNotices seeking possession (Housing Act 1985)Camden LBC v OppongDudley MBC v BaileyTorridge DC v JonesSlough BC v RobbinsMarath v MacGillivrayMountain v Hastingsgrounds for possession:nuisance or annoyanceAnti-social behaviourBreach of obligation and anti-social behaviourAccent Peerless Ltd (formerly Surrey Heath Housing Association Ltd) v KingsdonBarking and Dagenham LBC v Hyatt and HyattBedfordshire Pilgrims Housing Association Ltd v KhanBrent LBC v DoughanBristol CC v MousahCDS Housing v BellisCamden LBC v GilsenanCanterbury CC v LoweCastle Vale Housing Action Trust v GallagherCroydon LBC v MoodyDarlington BC v SterlingGreenwich LBC v GroganKnowsley Housing Trust v McMullenLambeth LBC v HowardLeeds and Yorkshire Housing Association v VertiganLondon and Quadrant Housing Trust v RootManchester CC v HigginsMatthews v AhmedNew Charter Housing (North) Ltd v AshcroftNewcastle upon Tyne CC v MorrisonNorth Devon Homes Ltd v BatchelorNorwich CC v FamuyiwaSheffield CC v GreenSheffield CC v JepsonSheffield CC v ShawSolon South West Housing Association Ltd v JamesWandsworth LBC v HargreavesWandsworth LBC v WebbWest Kent Housing Association v DaviesWoking BC v BistramKnowsley Housing Trust v PrescottSheffield CC v Fletchergrounds for possession:overcrowdingOvercrowdinggrounds for possession:owner-occupiersOwner-occupiersgrounds for possession:reasonablenessIntroduction and general considerationsCumming v DansonManchester CC v GreenShrimpton v Rabbitsgrounds for possession:rehearings or retrialsBracknell Forest BC v Greengrounds for possession:Rent Act tenanciesIntroductionRent arrearsBird v HildageDellenty v PellowShaw v Groomgrounds for possession:rent arrearsMarath v MacGillivrayRent arrearsRent arrearsBrent LBC v MarksBurgoyne v GriffithsHaringey LBC v StewartHayman v RowlandsLaimond Properties Ltd v RaeuchleLambeth LBC v HenryLambeth LBC v ThomasLee-Steere v JenningsSecond WRVS Housing Society v BlairSopwith v StutchburyTaj v Ali (No 1)Woodspring DC v Taylorgrounds for possession:repairs, possession refused where tenants had allowed access forEmpson v Fordegrounds for possession:review of lower court decisions, not restricted toBracknell Forest BC v Greengrounds for possession:secure tenanciesIntroductionRent arrears (Housing Act 1985 Sch 2 Ground 1)Notting Hill Housing Trust v JonesLewisham LBC v Simba-Tolagrounds for possession:subletting whole of premisesSubletting the whole of premisesLeith Properties Ltd v SpringerPazgate Ltd v McGrathRC Glaze Properties Ltd v Alabdinbonigrounds for possession:suitable alternative accommodationSuitable alternative accommodationAkram v AdamAmrit Holdings Co Ltd v ShahbakhtiFennbend Ltd v MillarHill v RochardJones v CookMontross Associated Investments v StoneMykolyshyn v NoahRedspring v FrancisSiddiqui v RashidYewbright Properties Ltd v StoneYoland Ltd v ReddingtonRosemary Estates Ltd v ConnollySuitable alternative accommodationBattlespring Ltd v GatesDawncar Investments Ltd v PlewsLee v WhitehouseMinchburn Estates Ltd v Fernandezgrounds for possession:weight given to tenant’s needsEnfield LBC v FrenchGypsies and Travellers:asked to leave, notice invalid where travellers not firstR (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset PoliceGypsies and Travellers:bed and breakfast accommodationCodona v Mid-Bedfordshire DCGypsies and Travellers:clearance of sitesBasildon DC v McCarthyGypsies and Travellers:cultural aversion to bricks and mortarCodona v Mid-Bedfordshire DCLee v Rhondda Cynon Taf CBCR (Maughan) v Leicester CCR (Price) v Carmarthenshire CCGypsies and Travellers:directions for removalR v Wealden DC ex p Wales; R v Lincolnshire CC ex p AtkinsonGypsies and Travellers:evictionR (Casey) v Crawley BCGypsies and Travellers:fair hearing, right to aR (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset PoliceGypsies and Travellers:formalities, not merits, consideration ofR v Wolverhampton MBC ex p DunneGypsies and Travellers:government departments not under obligations owed by councilsR v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food ex p CallaghanGypsies and Travellers:homelessnessBasildon DC v McCarthyCodona v Mid-Bedfordshire DCLee v Rhondda Cynon Taf CBCR (Maughan) v Leicester CCR (Price) v Carmarthenshire CCGypsies and Travellers:humanitarian and statutory considerationsR v Wealden DC ex p Wales; R v Lincolnshire CC ex p AtkinsonGypsies and Travellers:inhuman or degrading treatmentR (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset PoliceGypsies and Travellers:interim possession ordersR v Wealden DC ex p Wales; R v Lincolnshire CC ex p AtkinsonR v Wolverhampton MBC ex p DunneR (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset PoliceShropshire CC v WynneWard v Hillingdon LBCGypsies and Travellers:personal circumstances after making orders, enquiries intoR v Wolverhampton MBC ex p DunneGypsies and Travellers:private and family life and home, right to respect for:fair hearing, right to aR (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset PoliceGypsies and Travellers:private and family life and home, right to respect for:homelessnessR (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset PoliceWard v Hillingdon LBCCodona v Mid-Bedfordshire DCR (Maughan) v Leicester CCR (Price) v Carmarthenshire CCGypsies and Travellers:relevant matters, consideration of allR (Casey) v Crawley BCGypsies and Travellers:review decisions, no discretion toShropshire CC v WynneGypsies and Travellers:suitabilityCodona v Mid-Bedfordshire DCLee v Rhondda Cynon Taf CBCR (Maughan) v Leicester CCR (Price) v Carmarthenshire CCGypsies and Travellers:trespassersR v Leeds CC ex p MaloneyR (Casey) v Crawley BCGypsies and Travellers :trespassersR v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food ex p Callaghanhabitual residenceR (Antoine) v Reigate and Banstead DC and First Secretary of Statehallmarks of tenancies, presence ofKirby v Lynchharassment: State failure to protect from;Smirnova v Ukraineharassment:availability of accommodationR v Westminster CC ex p Bishopharassment:disrepair, damages forFestusi Porbeni v Abdellaziz Chaabdissharassment:motive or intentionKensington Housing Trust v Borkwoodharassment:nuisance and annoyanceKensington Housing Trust v BorkwoodKnowsley Housing Trust v McMullenSheffield CC v Shawharassment:past obsessions with neighboursKnowsley Housing Trust v McMullenharassment:serious harassment of young girlsSheffield CC v Shawharassment:subjective testKensington Housing Trust v Borkwoodharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:adequacy of damagesInjunctions against landlordsharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:agentsRamdath v Daleyharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:aggravated damagesFestusi Porbeni v Abdellaziz ChaabdissAsghar v AhmedNaveed v RajaRubio-Manzano v Ace Lettings and Pedonomouharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:assaultNaveed v RajaRubio-Manzano v Ace Lettings and Pedonomouharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:assessmentHousing Act 1988 ss27 and 28Islam v YapAricioglu v KaanFakhari v NewmanGrillo v Cant and Bassairi LtdHunt v HussainKeddey v HughesKhan v IqbalNaveed v RajaNeil v KingsnorthOdera v IqbalOgle v BundhooRubio-Manzano v Ace Lettings and PedonomouSchuchard v FuWalsh v ShuangyanWhite v Lambeth LBCharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:assured shorthold tenantsMelville v Brutonharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:assured tenantsCashmere v Walsh, Downing and VealeGrillo v Cant and Bassairi Ltdharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:bed and breakfast accommodation, spending time inOgle v Bundhooharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:building works resulting in tenants being unable to remainAbbas v Iqbalharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:caused departure, where it is doubtful that landlord hadMurray v Aslamharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:common lawAsghar v AhmedBranchett v BeaneyDrane v EvangelouLord and Haslewood-Ogram v JessopMafo v AdamsMcMillan v SinghRamdath v DaleyIslam v YapMehta v Royal Bank of ScotlandMurray v LloydAbbas v IqbalAnslow v HayesArabhalvaei v RezaeipoorAricioglu v KaanCashmere v Walsh, Downing and VealeFakhari v NewmanGrillo v Cant and Bassairi LtdHunt v HussainKeddey v HughesKhan v IqbalNaveed v RajaNeil v KingsnorthOdera v IqbalOgle v BundhooRubio-Manzano v Ace Lettings and PedonomouSchuchard v FuWalsh v ShuangyanWhite v Lambeth LBCharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:conduct of tenant:eviction, as not being cause ofCashmere v Walsh, Downing and Vealeharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:conduct of tenant:exemplary damagesMcMillan v Singhharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:conduct of tenant:reduction in damagesRegalgrand Ltd v DickersonCashmere v Walsh, Downing and Vealeharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:daily rateIslam v YapAricioglu v KaanHunt v HussainKhan v IqbalOgle v BundhooSchuchard v FuWalsh v Shuangyanharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:disrepair and harassmentArabhalvaei v Rezaeipoorharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:domestic violence:co-tenants, againstWandsworth LBC v Osei-Bonsuharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:domestic violence:damages, mitigation ofWandsworth LBC v Osei-Bonsuharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:exemplary damagesDrane v Evangelouharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:exemplary damages:agentsRamdath v Daleyharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:exemplary damages:all elements of compensation, coveringBranchett v Beaneyharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:exemplary damages:assaultNaveed v Rajaharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:exemplary damages:conduct of tenants, relevance ofMcMillan v Singhharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:exemplary damages:fines in criminal courts, in addition toAsghar v Ahmedharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:exemplary damages:higher rent obtained by landlord after evictionKeddey v Hughesharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:exemplary damages:motives of landlord, establishingMafo v Adamsharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:exemplary damages:vacant possession, eviction for sale withIslam v Yapharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:exemplary damages:warnings to landlordsKeddey v Hughesharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:expertsHousing Act 1988 ss27 and 28harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:fines in criminal courtsAsghar v Ahmedharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:freehold, statutory tenancies leading to reduction in value ofMurray v Lloydharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:higher rent obtained by landlord after evictionKeddey v Hughesharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:hotel roomsMehta v Royal Bank of Scotlandharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:injunctionsInjunctions against landlordsharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:licenseesMehta v Royal Bank of Scotlandharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:misrepresentationNeil v Kingsnorthharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:mitigationWandsworth LBC v Osei-Bonsuharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:motives of landlord, establishingMafo v Adamsharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:new accommodation, no surrender despite tenants indicating they hadOdera v Iqbalharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:occupy, right toKing v Jacksonharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:physically excluded, where tenant notHousing Act 1988 ss27 and 28harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:psychiatric harmHunt v Hussainharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:rough sleepingOgle v Bundhooharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:set-offKaur v GillNwokorie v Masonharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:setting asideMurray v Aslamharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:surrenderOdera v Iqbalharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:terminate tenancy, where co-tenants wanted toWandsworth LBC v Osei-Bonsuharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:threatsRubio-Manzano v Ace Lettings and Pedonomouharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:unsatisfactory accommodation, tenant spending 73 days inAnslow v Hayesharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:vacant possession, eviction for sale withIslam v Yapharassment and illegal eviction, damages for:warnings to landlordsKeddey v Hughesharassment and illegal eviction:abandonmentHousing Act 1988 ss27 and 28Kalas v Farmerharassment and illegal eviction:agents, landlords liable for acts ofSampson v Wilsonharassment and illegal eviction:assured shorthold tenantsMelville v Brutonharassment and illegal eviction:bailiffs, eviction without use of courtHaniff v RobinsonFrancis v Brownharassment and illegal eviction:breach of contractCivil proceedingsharassment and illegal eviction:caused departure, where it is doubtful that landlord hadMurray v Aslamharassment and illegal eviction:civil proceedingsCivil proceedingsProtection from Eviction Act 1977 (civil provisions)Desnousse v Newham LBCMcCall v AbeleszMohamed v Manek and Kensington and Chelsea RLBCPirabakaran v PatelSumeghova v McMahonRogerson v Wigan MBCharassment and illegal eviction:co-tenants wanted to terminate tenancies, whereWandsworth LBC v Osei-Bonsuharassment and illegal eviction:committal for contemptInjunctions against landlordsharassment and illegal eviction:completion, purchasers let into occupation beforeJones v Miahharassment and illegal eviction:contempt, committal forInjunctions against landlordsCommittal against landlordsHowes v HowesO’Neill v MurrayParsons v NasarSaxby v McKinleyWright v Jessharassment and illegal eviction:contractCivil proceedingsharassment and illegal eviction:court bailiffs, eviction without use ofHaniff v Robinsonharassment and illegal eviction:criminal offencesHousing Act 1988 ss27 and 28harassment and illegal eviction:damagesInjunctions against landlordsharassment and illegal eviction:direct physical interference, breach of covenant of quiet enjoyment withoutKenny v Preenharassment and illegal eviction:expertsHousing Act 1988 ss27 and 28harassment and illegal eviction:express terms, breach ofCivil proceedingsharassment and illegal eviction:failure of landlord to take action against other occupantsLandlord’s failure to take action against other occupantsMitchell v Glasgow CCHussain v Lancaster CCLippiatt v South Gloucestershire CouncilMowan v Wandsworth LBCO’Leary v Islington LBCX and Y v Hounslow LBCharassment and illegal eviction:gas and electricity:withdrawalHousing Act 1988 ss27 and 28harassment and illegal eviction:Housing Act 1985 sections 27 and 28Housing Act 1988 ss27 and 28Abbott v BayleyFrancis v BrownJones v MiahKalas v FarmerKaur v GillKing v JacksonMelville v BrutonMurray v AslamNwokorie v MasonRegalgrand Ltd v DickersonSampson v WilsonTagro v Cafane and PatelWandsworth LBC v Osei-Bonsuharassment and illegal eviction:implied terms, breach ofCivil proceedingsharassment and illegal eviction:imprisonmentKalas v Farmerharassment and illegal eviction:injunctionsInjunctions against landlordsLewis v LewisLove v HerrityParsons v NasarPatel v W H Smith (Eziot) Ltdharassment and illegal eviction:intended purchasers as not being landlordsFrancis v Brownharassment and illegal eviction:keys to wrecked room as not being reinstatement, offers ofTagro v Cafane and Patelharassment and illegal eviction:landlord, definition ofHousing Act 1988 ss27 and 28Francis v Brownharassment and illegal eviction:lease/licence distinctionCivil proceedingsharassment and illegal eviction:licensees, harassment by telephone calls ofKhorasandjian v Bushharassment and illegal eviction:major building works, disruption byGuppys (Bridport) Ltd v Brooklingharassment and illegal eviction:nuisance and annoyanceCivil proceedingsGuppys (Bridport) Ltd v BrooklingKhorasandjian v BushSampson v Hodson-Pressingerharassment and illegal eviction:physical eviction not necessaryQueensway Marketing Ltd v Associated Restaurants Ltdharassment and illegal eviction:physically excluded, where tenant notHousing Act 1988 ss27 and 28harassment and illegal eviction:police, duty of care ofCowan v Chief Constable for Avon and Somerset Constabularyharassment and illegal eviction:possession ordersBotu v Brent LBCHaniff v Robinsonharassment and illegal eviction:Protection from Eviction Act 1977Civil proceedingsProtection from Eviction Act 1977 (civil provisions)Desnousse v Newham LBCMcCall v AbeleszMohamed v Manek and Kensington and Chelsea RLBCPirabakaran v PatelSumeghova v McMahonRogerson v Wigan MBCharassment and illegal eviction:Protection from Harassment Act 1977Civil proceedingsharassment and illegal eviction:purchasers:completion, purchasers let into occupation beforeJones v Miahharassment and illegal eviction:purchasers:intended purchasers as not being landlordsFrancis v Brownharassment and illegal eviction:purchasers:landlord, definition ofFrancis v BrownJones v Miahharassment and illegal eviction:quiet enjoyment, covenants ofCivil proceedingsKenny v PreenQueensway Marketing Ltd v Associated Restaurants Ltdharassment and illegal eviction:reinstatementHousing Act 1988 ss27 and 28Tagro v Cafane and Patelharassment and illegal eviction:residential occupier, definition ofHousing Act 1988 ss27 and 28harassment and illegal eviction:scaffolding, erection ofQueensway Marketing Ltd v Associated Restaurants Ltdharassment and illegal eviction:security of tenureCivil proceedingsharassment and illegal eviction:services, withdrawal ofHousing Act 1988 ss27 and 28harassment and illegal eviction:set-offKalas v FarmerNwokorie v Masonharassment and illegal eviction:set aside, where possession ordersBotu v Brent LBCharassment and illegal eviction:students whilst studying, disturbance ofSpeiro Lechouritis v Goldmile Properties Ltdharassment and illegal eviction:telephone callsKhorasandjian v Bushharassment and illegal eviction:tortCivil proceedingsharassment and illegal eviction:trespass to landPatel v W H Smith (Eziot) LtdCivil proceedingsharassment and illegal eviction:valuationHousing Act 1988 ss27 and 28hard cases supportIntroductionhardship:alternative accommodation, prospect of findingBaker v MacIverhardship:burden of proofHodges v Bleehardship:landlords or members of family, premises required forBaker v MacIverhardship:suitable alternative accommodationAmrit Holdings Co Ltd v Shahbakhtihazard assessmentsBolton MBC v Patelhazard awareness noticesLocal authority enforcementhealth:homelessnessSuitability and out of area placementshealth:medical advisers, opinions ofShala v Birmingham CCSimms v Islington LBCR v Lambeth LBC ex p Waltershealth:medical assessmentsR (Adow) v Newham LBCR v Medina BC ex p DeeR v Lambeth LBC ex p Waltershealth:medical evidenceAllison v Wandsworth LBCHijazi v Kensington and Chelsea RLBChealth:medical treatmentR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Avdichealth:prejudicial to healthCriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 and other ActsBirmingham CC v OakleyR v Bristol CC ex p EverettSFI Group plc v Gosport BCR (Vella) v Lambeth LBC and London and Quadrant Housing TrustSouthwark LBC v Simpsonhealth:single men with health problems, inadequate enquiries aboutBenson v Lewisham LBChealth:subtenanciesMcLoughlin’s Curator Bonis v Motherwell DChealth:suitability of accommodationR v Lewisham LBC ex p Dolanhealth:tuberculosis, temporary absences due toWigley v Leighhearsay evidence :appealsAnti-social behaviour (Housing Acts 1985 and 1988)hearsay evidence :careful assessmentAnti-social behaviour (Housing Acts 1985 and 1988)hearsay evidence :improvements in behaviour, admissibility despiteSolon South West Housing Association Ltd v Jameshearsay evidence :injunctionsMoat Housing Group South Ltd v Harris and HartlessWear Valley DC v Robsonhearsay evidence :nuisance and annoyanceAnti-social behaviour (Housing Acts 1985 and 1988)Solon South West Housing Association Ltd v Jamesheating:condensationCarr v Hackney LBCFarrar v Dover CCPike v Sefton MBCheating:damagesFerguson v Jonesheating:different system, installing aCreska Ltd v Hammersmith and Fulham LBCheating:disrepairCreska Ltd v Hammersmith and Fulham LBCFerguson v JonesSarmad v Okelloheating:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under:backgroundPringle v Hackney LBCheating:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under:condensationCarr v Hackney LBCFarrar v Dover CCPike v Sefton MBCheating:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under:failure to useFarrar v Dover CCPike v Sefton MBCheating:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under:nuisanceGreater London Council v Tower Hamlets LBCheating:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under:statutory nuisanceGreater London Council v Tower Hamlets LBCheating:failure to useFarrar v Dover CCPike v Sefton MBCheating:nuisanceGreater London Council v Tower Hamlets LBCheating:service charges and long leasesPole Properties Ltd v Feinbergheating:statutory nuisanceGreater London Council v Tower Hamlets LBChigh or low rent, tenancies at a :compulsory letting at low rentUrbárska Obec Trencianske Biskupice v Slovakiahigh or low rent, tenancies at a :gas and electricity of bills as not being rent, payment ofBostock v Bryant and Anotherhigh or low rent, tenancies at a :informal arrangements, low rent underRoyal Philanthropic Society v Countyhigh or low rent, tenancies at a :LondonTenancies at a high or low rent (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 paras 2 and 3 and Rent Act 1977 ss4–5)high or low rent, tenancies at a :security of tenureTenancies at a high or low rent (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 paras 2 and 3 and Rent Act 1977 ss4–5)Bostock v Bryant and Anotherhigh or low rent, tenancies at a :shamsBhopal v Waliahigh or low rent, tenancies at a :written agreements for higher rentBhopal v Waliahighways :roots of trees, highway authorities responsible forDelaware Mansions Ltd v City of WestminsterHMOs (Houses in Multiple Occupation)Local authority enforcementholiday lets:assured tenanciesHoliday lets (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 9 and Rent Act 1977 s9)Buchmann v MayKillick v RobertsR v Rent Officer for Camden LBC ex p PlantMcHale v Danehamholiday lets:business use, covenants againstCaradon DC v Patonholiday lets:chaletsNutt v Readholiday lets:fraud by tenantsKillick v Robertsholiday lets:injunctionsCaradon DC v Patonholiday lets:reality of situationR v Rent Officer for Camden LBC ex p Plantholiday lets:rescissionKillick v Robertsholiday lets:security of tenureHoliday lets (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 9 and Rent Act 1977 s9)Buchmann v MayKillick v RobertsR v Rent Officer for Camden LBC ex p PlantMcHale v Danehamholiday lets:shamsBuchmann v Mayholiday lets:working holidaysMcHale v Danehamhome loss and disturbance paymentsHome loss and disturbance paymentshomelessness, definition ofThe meaning of ‘homelessness’homelessness, definition of:accommodation, definition of‘Accommodation’R v Brent LBC ex p AwuaR v Ealing LBC ex p Sidhuhomelessness, definition of:employers’ offered to re-employ and re-accommodate applicants, whereR v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p Mintonhomelessness, definition of:entry, inability to secureInability to secure entry to accommodation/no place to keep moveable structure: s175(2)R v Chiltern DC ex p RobertsR v Hillingdon LBC ex p Baxhomelessness, definition of:execution of warrants for possession, not homeless untilR (Sacupima) v Newham LBChomelessness, definition of:houseboat owners without permanent mooringsR v Hillingdon LBC ex p Baxhomelessness, definition of:intentional homelessnessReasonable to continue to occupy: s175(3)homelessness, definition of:licensees:cruise, licence of houseboats toR v Hillingdon LBC ex p Baxhomelessness, definition of:licensees:houseboat owners without permanent mooringsR v Hillingdon LBC ex p Baxhomelessness, definition of:licensees:leave, where asked to leaveR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p O’Sullivanhomelessness, definition of:licensees:unprotectedR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p O’Sullivanhomelessness, definition of:notice to quitFletcher v Brent LBChomelessness, definition of:occupation, rights ofR (B) v Southwark LBCRights of occupation: s175(1)Abdullah v Westminster CCFletcher v Brent LBCR (Sacupima) v Newham LBCR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p O’SullivanR v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p Mintonhomelessness, definition of:prisonersR (B) v Southwark LBChomelessness, definition of:reasonableness to continue to occupyThe meaning of ‘homelessness’Reasonable to continue to occupy: s175(3)homelessness, definition of:short-term accommodationR v Brent LBC ex p Awuahomelessness, definition of:temporary accommodationR v Brent LBC ex p Awuahomelessness, definition of:threatsReasonable to continue to occupy: s175(3)homelessness, definition of:travelling showsR v Chiltern DC ex p Robertshomelessness, definition of:women’s refugesR v Ealing LBC ex p Sidhuhomelessness, offers:guidanceRavichandran v Lewisham LBChomelessness, offers:other authorities, applications toApplications to other authoritiesR v Slough BC ex p Ealing LBCR v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Camden LBChomelessness, offers:out of area placementsSuitability and out of area placementsR (Yumsak) v Enfield LBCR (W) v Sheffield CChomelessness, offers:overcrowdingOsei v Southwark LBChomelessness, offers:parents of EU nationalsHarrow LBC v IbrahimTeixeira v Lambeth LBChomelessness, offers:permanent accommodationR (Bibi (No 1) and Al-Nashed) v Newham LBCR v Newham LBC ex p Miah (Askir)homelessness, offers:personal circumstancesR v Brent LBC ex p Omarhomelessness, offers:Poor LawsIntroductionhomelessness, offers:possession ordersGreen and Coyne v Croydon LBChomelessness, offers:preferencesGeneralR (Lin) v Barnet LBChomelessness, offers:pregnant womenSuitability and out of area placementsR v Newham LBC ex p Dadahomelessness, offers:prejudgment of casesLewisham LBC v Adeyemi/Lewisham LBC v Akinsolahomelessness, offers:prisonersR (B) v Southwark LBChomelessness, offers:Protection from Eviction Act 1977Desnousse v Newham LBCRogerson v Wigan MBChomelessness, offers:reasonable belief in homelessnessR v Islington LBC ex p Bhomelessness, offers:reasonable preferencesR (Lin) v Barnet LBChomelessness, offers:reasonableness of offersR v Wandsworth LBC ex p Wingrove and MansoorR v Newham LBC ex p Ojuri (No 5)homelessness, offers:refusalGriffiths v St Helens Councilhomelessness, offers:refusal of offersGriffiths v St Helens CouncilVilvarasa v Harrow LBChomelessness, offers:rent arrearsGreen and Coyne v Croydon LBCR v Wyre BC ex p JoyceR v Newham LBC ex p Miah (Askir)homelessness, offers:repeat/fresh applicationsRepeat/fresh applicationsR v Harrow LBC ex p FahiaTower Hamlets LBC v Begum (Rikha)G v Haringey LBCR (Griffin) v Southwark LBCAli v Camden LBChomelessness, offers:resident permits, refusal ofR (Burns) v Southwark LBChomelessness, offers:restrictions on applicationsApplications by homeless peoplehomelessness, offers:right to resideHarrow LBC v IbrahimTeixeira v Lambeth LBCZambrano v Office National de l’EmploiLekpo-Bozua v Hackney LBCR (Mohamed) v Harrow LBChomelessness, offers:same day policyR (Khazai) v Birmingham CChomelessness, offers:section of legislation offers made, must be clear under whichRavichandran v Lewisham LBChomelessness, offers:security of tenureR v Newham LBC ex p Ojuri (No 5)R v Westminster CC ex p Abdulkadirhomelessness, offers:settled accommodationR v Brent LBC ex p AwuaR v Wandsworth LBC ex p Wingrove and Mansoorhomelessness, offers:short-term accommodationR v Brent LBC ex p Awuahomelessness, offers:social securityR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Duro-Ramahomelessness, offers:spouses and partners, separation fromR (Griffin) v Southwark LBChomelessness, offers:successionSharp v Brent LBChomelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:adaptions, assurances that work would be done onBoreh v Ealing LBChomelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:affordabilitySuitability and out of area placementshomelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:babies, women withR v Newham LBC ex p Dadahomelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:bed and breakfastSuitability and out of area placementsCodona v Mid-Bedfordshire DCR v Newham LBC ex p Ojuri (No 3)homelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:continuing duty, asR (Zaher) v Westminster CChomelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:damagesR v Ealing LBC ex p ParkinsonR (Morris) v Newham LBChomelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:deferral of dutyR v Newham LBC ex p Begum (Mashuda)homelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:discharge of dutySuitability and out of area placementshomelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:enquiriesR v Sedgemoor DC ex p McCarthyhomelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:exceptional circumstancesR (W) v Sheffield CChomelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:family, proximity toSuitability and out of area placementsR (Yumsak) v Enfield LBChomelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:Gypsies and TravellersCodona v Mid-Bedfordshire DCLee v Rhondda Cynon Taf CBCR (Maughan) v Leicester CCR (Price) v Carmarthenshire CChomelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:housing benefit shortfallR v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Kaurhomelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:injunctionsR (Khan) v Newham LBChomelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:interim accommodationR (Flash) v Southwark LBChomelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:Kurdish/Turkish community when applicant in fear of community, perverse placement inR v Haringey LBC ex p Karamanhomelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:long term but suitable for short term, accommodation not reasonable forBirmingham CC v Ali and Aweys; Moran v Manchester CChomelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:medical factorsR v Lewisham LBC ex p Dolanhomelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:one-bedroom flats for grandmother and grandsonR (Flash) v Southwark LBChomelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:out of area placementsSuitability and out of area placementsR (Yumsak) v Enfield LBCR (W) v Sheffield CChomelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:personal circumstancesR v Brent LBC ex p OmarR v Newham LBC ex p Ojuri (No 3)homelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:pregnant womenSuitability and out of area placementsR v Newham LBC ex p Dadahomelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:private and family life and home, right to respect forR (Morris) v Newham LBCR (Price) v Carmarthenshire CCR (Yumsak) v Enfield LBChomelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:reviewsOsseily v Westminster CChomelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:social grounds, suitability onR v Lewisham LBC ex p Dolanhomelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:substitution of own views by recordersWatson v Wandsworth LBChomelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:support services, proximity toSuitability and out of area placementshomelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:WalesSuitability and out of area placementshomelessness, offers:support services, proximity toSuitability and out of area placementshomelessness, offers:systems failureR (Anonymous) v Southwark LBCR (Kelly) v Birmingham CChomelessness, offers:temporary accommodationRogerson v Wigan MBCR v Brent LBC ex p Awuahomelessness, offers:third parties, accommodation provided byR v Bristol CC ex p Brownehomelessness, offers:threats of homelessnessReasonable to continue to occupy: s175(3)homelessness, offers:transfer, reasonable belief in homelessness andR v Islington LBC ex p Bhomelessness, offers:translation of lettersAli v Birmingham CChomelessness, offers:translation of offer lettersAli v Birmingham CChomelessness, offers:travelling showsR v Chiltern DC ex p Robertshomelessness, offers:trespassersR v Hillingdon LBC ex p McDonaghhomelessness, offers:unemployedR (Mohamed) v Harrow LBChomelessness, offers:unfair contract termsKhatun, Zeb and Iqbal v Newham LBC and Office of Fair Tradinghomelessness, offers:view accommodation, opportunity toKhatun, Zeb and Iqbal v Newham LBC and Office of Fair Tradinghomelessness, offers:WalesSuitability and out of area placementshomelessness, offers:warningsMuse v Brent LBCVilvarasa v Harrow LBChomelessness, offers:women’s refugeR v Ealing LBC ex p SidhuBirmingham CC v Ali and Aweys; Moran v Manchester CChomelessness, offers:workers, definition ofBarry v Southwark LBChomelessness:abroad, accommodation situatedOsei v Southwark LBCR v Camden LBC ex p ArandaR v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p MonafR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Duro-RamaR v Newham LBC ex p AjayiR v Westminster CC ex p Augustinhomelessness:accommodation, definition of‘Accommodation’R v Brent LBC ex p AwuaR v Ealing LBC ex p Sidhuhomelessness:adaptions, assurances that work would be done onBoreh v Ealing LBChomelessness:affordabilityOdunsi v Brent LBCSuitability and out of area placementshomelessness:allocationGeneralR (Lin) v Barnet LBChomelessness:alternative accommodation, refusal ofMuse v Brent LBChomelessness:applicationsApplications by homeless peopleR (Khazai) v Birmingham CChomelessness:appropriate arrangements for applicationsR v Camden LBC ex p Gillanhomelessness:assurances that work would be doneBoreh v Ealing LBChomelessness:assured shorthold tenancies, refusal ofGriffiths v St Helens Councilhomelessness:babies, women withR v Brent LBC ex p YusufR v Newham LBC ex p Dadahomelessness:bed and breakfast:all homeless households in B&Bs, policy of bookingR v Newham LBC ex p Ojuri (No 3)homelessness:bed and breakfast:children or pregnant womenSuitability and out of area placementshomelessness:bed and breakfast:dwelling, as not being aR v Newham LBC ex p Ojuri (No 5)homelessness:bed and breakfast:gypsiesCodona v Mid-Bedfordshire DChomelessness:bed and breakfast:individual needs, consideration ofR v Newham LBC ex p Ojuri (No 3)homelessness:bed and breakfast:private and family life and home, right to respect forOrejudos v Kensington and Chelsea RLBChomelessness:bed and breakfast:signing in rules, refusal to comply withOrejudos v Kensington and Chelsea RLBChomelessness:bed and breakfast:suitabilitySuitability and out of area placementshomelessness:blanket same day policiesR (Khazai) v Birmingham CChomelessness:carers, need forAli v Camden LBChomelessness:challengesR v Hillingdon LBC ex p Puhlhoferhomelessness:children:babies, women withR v Newham LBC ex p Dadahomelessness:children:bed and breakfastSuitability and out of area placementshomelessness:children:dependants, applications fromR v Oldham MBC ex p Garlick; R v Bexley LBC ex p Bentumhomelessness:children:eligibilityHarrow LBC v IbrahimTeixeira v Lambeth LBChomelessness:children:medical examinationsR v Lambeth LBC ex p Waltershomelessness:children:school age, ofHarrow LBC v IbrahimTeixeira v Lambeth LBChomelessness:clear explanations of offersGriffiths v St Helens Councilhomelessness:competenceCompetence to make an applicationR v Oldham MBC ex p Garlick; R v Bexley LBC ex p BentumR v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Ferdous BegumR v Camden LBC ex p HersiR v Hillingdon LBC ex p Streetinghomelessness:damagesR v Northavon DC ex p Palmerhomelessness:definitionThe meaning of ‘homelessness’homelessness:dependants, applications fromR v Oldham MBC ex p Garlick; R v Bexley LBC ex p Bentumhomelessness:disability living allowanceAli v Camden LBChomelessness:discriminationPieretti v Enfield LBChomelessness:domestic violenceReasonable to continue to occupy: s175(3)homelessness:duty:acceptanceR v Northavon DC ex p Palmerhomelessness:duty:damagesR v Northavon DC ex p Palmerhomelessness:EEA nationalsZambrano v Office National de l’EmploiR (Burns) v Southwark LBCR (Mohamed) v Harrow LBChomelessness:eligibility for assistanceEligibilityHarrow LBC v IbrahimTeixeira v Lambeth LBCZambrano v Office National de l’EmploiBarry v Southwark LBCLekpo-Bozua v Hackney LBCR (Morris) v Westminster CCR (Burns) v Southwark LBCR (Mohamed) v Harrow LBChomelessness:employers’ offered to re-employ and re-accommodate applicants, whereR v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p Mintonhomelessness:employment, impact onR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Duro-Ramahomelessness:enquiriesEnquiriesGreen and Coyne v Croydon LBCPieretti v Enfield LBCR v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p BayaniR v Sevenoaks DC ex p ReynoldsR v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Khatun (Shafia)R v Westminster CC ex p AugustinRobinson v Brent LBCWilliams v Birmingham CCR v Dacorum BC ex p BrownR v Gravesham BC ex p WinchesterR v Hackney LBC ex p DecordovaR v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p SilchenstedtR v Lambeth LBC ex p WaltersR v Nottingham CC ex p CostelloR v Poole BC ex p CooperR v Sedgemoor DC ex p McCarthyR v Westminster CC ex p IqbalR v Woodspring DC ex p WaltersR v Wyre BC ex p JoyceOdunsi v Brent LBChomelessness:entry, inability to secureInability to secure entry to accommodation/no place to keep moveable structure: s175(2)R v Chiltern DC ex p RobertsR v Hillingdon LBC ex p Baxhomelessness:EU nationalsEligibilityHarrow LBC v IbrahimTeixeira v Lambeth LBCZambrano v Office National de l’EmploiBarry v Southwark LBCLekpo-Bozua v Hackney LBChomelessness:exactly the same facts testRepeat/fresh applicationsR v Harrow LBC ex p FahiaR (Griffin) v Southwark LBChomelessness:exceptional circumstancesShrewsbury and Atcham BC v Evanshomelessness:execution of warrants for possession, not homeless untilR (Sacupima) v Newham LBChomelessness:experts, new material fromG v Haringey LBChomelessness:explanation of offers in lettersGriffiths v St Helens Councilhomelessness:false statementsLewisham LBC v Adeyemi/Lewisham LBC v AkinsolaRushcliffe BC v WatsonShrewsbury and Atcham BC v Evanshomelessness:family:applications used to circumvent decisionsR v Camden LBC ex p Hersihomelessness:family:discharge of dutyR v Camden LBC ex p Hersihomelessness:family:proximity to familySuitability and out of area placementshomelessness:form of applicationsR v Chiltern DC ex p Robertshomelessness:freedom of informationR v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p Bayanihomelessness:further offers refusedAkhtar v Birmingham CChomelessness:gatekeeping approachGate-keepingEdwards and others v Birmingham City CouncilR (Anonymous) v Southwark LBCR (Kelly) v Birmingham CCR (Khazai) v Birmingham CCR (Raw) v Lambeth LBChomelessness:guidanceRavichandran v Lewisham LBChomelessness:Gypsies and Travellers:bed and breakfast accommodationCodona v Mid-Bedfordshire DChomelessness:Gypsies and Travellers:clearance of sitesBasildon DC v McCarthyhomelessness:Gypsies and Travellers:cultural aversion to bricks and mortarCodona v Mid-Bedfordshire DCLee v Rhondda Cynon Taf CBCR (Maughan) v Leicester CCR (Price) v Carmarthenshire CChomelessness:Gypsies and Travellers:private and family life, right to respect forCodona v Mid-Bedfordshire DCR (Maughan) v Leicester CCR (Price) v Carmarthenshire CChomelessness:Gypsies and Travellers:suitabilityCodona v Mid-Bedfordshire DCLee v Rhondda Cynon Taf CBChomelessness:health needsSuitability and out of area placementshomelessness:hostels:Protection from Eviction Act 1977Rogerson v Wigan MBChomelessness:houseboat owners without permanent mooringsR v Hillingdon LBC ex p Baxhomelessness:immigration control, persons subject toEligibilityLekpo-Bozua v Hackney LBChomelessness:interim accommodation duties and powersMohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham LBChomelessness:interim accommodation duties and powers:blanket same day policiesR (Khazai) v Birmingham CChomelessness:interim accommodation duties and powers:one-bedroom flats for grandmother and grandsonR (Flash) v Southwark LBChomelessness:interim accommodation duties and powers:suitabilityR (Flash) v Southwark LBChomelessness:interim accommodation duties and powers:system failuresR (Anonymous) v Southwark LBCR (Kelly) v Birmingham CChomelessness:interviews:necessityR v Sevenoaks DC ex p Reynoldshomelessness:interviews:notes, without takingR v Dacorum BC ex p Brownhomelessness:interviews:questioning inhibiting applicants from stating caseR v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Khatun (Shafia)homelessness:interviews:sympathetically, to be conductedR v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Khatun (Shafia)homelessness:Kurdish/Turkish community when applicant in fear of community,:perverse placement inR v Haringey LBC ex p Karamanhomelessness:labelsFamily Housing Association v Joneshomelessness:lawfully in UK, duties owed to all personsR v Hillingdon LBC ex p Streetinghomelessness:legitimate expectationsR (Bibi (No 1) and Al-Nashed) v Newham LBChomelessness:length of tenure, reasonableness ofR v Wandsworth LBC ex p Wingrove and Mansoorhomelessness:letters:applications can be made byR v Chiltern DC ex p Robertshomelessness:letters:clear explanations of offersGriffiths v St Helens Councilhomelessness:Lettings Direct Scheme, referrals toR (Raw) v Lambeth LBChomelessness:licencesDesnousse v Newham LBCR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p O’SullivanR v Hillingdon LBC ex p Baxhomelessness:licences:licence/tenancy distinctionBrennan v Lambeth LBCFamily Housing Association v Joneshomelessness:long term but suitable for short term, accommodation not reasonable forBirmingham CC v Ali and Aweys; Moran v Manchester CChomelessness:main housing duty, discharge ofLocal connection and referralhomelessness:material changes of circumstances testRepeat/fresh applicationsTower Hamlets LBC v Begum (Rikha)Ali v Camden LBChomelessness:medical advisers, reliance on opinions ofR v Lambeth LBC ex p Waltershomelessness:medical recordsR v Lambeth LBC ex p Waltershomelessness:mental capacityR v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Ferdous Begumhomelessness:mental health issues, notice to persons withR v Westminster CC ex p Abdulkadirhomelessness:National Assistance Act 1948Introductionhomelessness:notice:mental health issues, persons withR v Westminster CC ex p Abdulkadirhomelessness:notice:quit, toFletcher v Brent LBChomelessness:notice:reasonablenessR v Newham LBC ex p Ojuri (No 5)homelessness:notice:short noticeR v Westminster CC ex p Abdulkadirhomelessness:nuisance or annoyanceR v Bristol CC ex p BradicGriffiths v St Helens MBCR v Swansea CC ex p JohnR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p PR v Newham LBC ex p Campbellhomelessness:occupation, rights ofR (B) v Southwark LBCRights of occupation: s175(1)Abdullah v Westminster CCFletcher v Brent LBCR (Sacupima) v Newham LBCR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p O’SullivanR v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p Mintonhomelessness:offers:alternative accommodation, refusal ofMuse v Brent LBChomelessness:offers:explanations in letters, clearGriffiths v St Helens Councilhomelessness and reasonableness of continued occupationThe meaning of ‘homelessness’Reasonable to continue to occupy: s175(3)homelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:abroad, property situatedOsei v Southwark LBCR v Camden LBC ex p ArandaR v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p MonafR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Duro-RamaR v Newham LBC ex p Ajayihomelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:affordabilityReasonable to continue to occupy: s175(3)R v Brent LBC ex p BaruwaR v Brent LBC ex p GrossettR v Croydon LBC ex p GrahamR v Wandsworth LBC ex p HawthorneR v Hillingdon LBC ex p Tinnhomelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:assured shorthold tenancies, reasonableness of remaining until court orders of persons withR v Croydon LBC ex p Jarvishomelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:availability of accommodation‘Available’ accommodation: s176Begum (Nipa) v Tower Hamlets LBCOxford CC v BullR v Westminster CC ex p BishopR v Barking and Dagenham LBC ex p OkuneyeR v Hackney LBC ex p TonnicodiR v Lambeth LBC ex p LyR v Newham LBC ex p Khan and HussainR v Peterborough CC ex p Carrhomelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:balancing circumstancesNoh v Hammersmith and Fulham LBChomelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:childrenR v Brent LBC ex p YusufR v Medina BC ex p Deehomelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:current occupationWaltham Forest LBC v Malobahomelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:definition of homelessnessThe meaning of ‘homelessness’Reasonable to continue to occupy: s175(3)homelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:discharge of dutySuitability and out of area placementshomelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:domestic violenceReasonable to continue to occupy: s175(3)Yemshaw v Hounslow LBCBond v Leicester CCR v Croydon LBC ex p TothR v Newham LBC ex p McIlroyhomelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:duration of stay in accommodationKacar v Enfield LBChomelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:ex-spouses, being expected to reside withR v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p Moncadahomelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:fire safety, inadequacy ofR v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p Ben-El-Mabroukhomelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:general housing circumstances in area, assessment ofR v Brent LBC ex p BariiseR v Newham LBC ex p Tower Hamlets LBChomelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:intentional homelessnessReasonable to continue to occupy: s175(3)Noh v Hammersmith and Fulham LBCR v Brent LBC ex p YusufReasonable to continue to occupyhomelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:isolated accommodationKacar v Enfield LBChomelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:matrimonial homeR v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p Moncadahomelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:medical advice that property unsuitable for babiesR v Medina BC ex p Deehomelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:other authority areas, assessment ofR v Newham LBC ex p Tower Hamlets LBChomelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:overcrowdingElrify v Westminster CCHarouki v Kensington and Chelsea RLBCR v Westminster CC ex p AlouatSabah Mohamoud v Greenwich LBChomelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:personal circumstancesNoh v Hammersmith and Fulham LBChomelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:physical conditionsR v Broxbourne BC ex p WillmothElrify v Westminster CCHarouki v Kensington and Chelsea RLBCR v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p Ben-El-MabroukR v Medina BC ex p DeeR v Westminster CC ex p AlouatSabah Mohamoud v Greenwich LBChomelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:pregnant women leaving property not suitable for babyR v Brent LBC ex p Yusufhomelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:psychiatric evidenceNoh v Hammersmith and Fulham LBChomelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:reasonsR v Northampton BC ex p Clarksonhomelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:service licenseesR v Portsmouth CC ex p Knighthomelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:spouses, accommodation not available toHemans v Windsor and Maidenhead RBChomelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:subjective testR v Brent LBC ex p McManushomelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:threatsThreatened with homelessness: s175(4)homelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:trespasser, not reasonable for service licensee to remain as aR v Portsmouth CC ex p Knighthomelessness assistance, eligibility forEligibilityHarrow LBC v IbrahimTeixeira v Lambeth LBCZambrano v Office National de l’EmploiBarry v Southwark LBCLekpo-Bozua v Hackney LBCR (Morris) v Westminster CCR (Burns) v Southwark LBCR (Mohamed) v Harrow LBChomelessness assistance, eligibility for:abroad, persons fromEligibilityhomelessness assistance, eligibility for:childrenHarrow LBC v IbrahimTeixeira v Lambeth LBChomelessness assistance, eligibility for:dependentsZambrano v Office National de l’Emploihomelessness assistance, eligibility for:EEA nationals:dependantsZambrano v Office National de l’Emploihomelessness assistance, eligibility for:EEA nationals:resident permits, refusal ofR (Burns) v Southwark LBChomelessness assistance, eligibility for:EEA nationals:right to resideZambrano v Office National de l’EmploiR (Mohamed) v Harrow LBChomelessness assistance, eligibility for:EEA nationals:unemployedR (Mohamed) v Harrow LBChomelessness assistance, eligibility for:EU nationalsEligibilityHarrow LBC v IbrahimTeixeira v Lambeth LBCZambrano v Office National de l’Emploihomelessness assistance, eligibility for:EU nationals:dependentsZambrano v Office National de l’Emploihomelessness assistance, eligibility for:EU nationals:immigration control, persons subject toLekpo-Bozua v Hackney LBChomelessness assistance, eligibility for:EU nationals:parentsHarrow LBC v IbrahimTeixeira v Lambeth LBChomelessness assistance, eligibility for:EU nationals:right to resideHarrow LBC v IbrahimLekpo-Bozua v Hackney LBChomelessness assistance, eligibility for:EU nationals:school age, children ofHarrow LBC v IbrahimTeixeira v Lambeth LBChomelessness assistance, eligibility for:EU nationals:workers, definition ofBarry v Southwark LBChomelessness assistance, eligibility for:immigration control, persons subject toEligibilityLekpo-Bozua v Hackney LBChomelessness assistance, eligibility for:parentsHarrow LBC v IbrahimTeixeira v Lambeth LBChomelessness assistance, eligibility for:resident permits, refusal ofR (Burns) v Southwark LBChomelessness assistance, eligibility for:right to resideHarrow LBC v IbrahimTeixeira v Lambeth LBCZambrano v Office National de l’EmploiLekpo-Bozua v Hackney LBCR (Mohamed) v Harrow LBChomelessness assistance, eligibility for:school age, children ofHarrow LBC v IbrahimTeixeira v Lambeth LBChomelessness assistance, eligibility for:unemployedR (Mohamed) v Harrow LBChomelessness assistance, eligibility for:workers, definition ofBarry v Southwark LBChomelessness decisions, appeals againstAppealshomelessness decisions, appeals against:adjournmentsBerhane v Lambeth LBChomelessness decisions, appeals against:agents, notification of decisions toDharmaraj v Hounslow LBChomelessness decisions, appeals against:benefit to applicants, entertaining appeals on withdrawn review decisions where orders would be ofTower Hamlets LBC v Deugihomelessness decisions, appeals against:civil rights and obligationsTomlinson v Birmingham CC (Ali v Birmingham CC)homelessness decisions, appeals against:costsR v Lambeth LBC ex p Wilsonhomelessness decisions, appeals against:county courtsWhich court?Appealshomelessness decisions, appeals against:county courts:adjournmentsBerhane v Lambeth LBChomelessness decisions, appeals against:county courts:further review, prescribing conduct ofAdan v Newham LBChomelessness decisions, appeals against:court, powers ofBerhane v Lambeth LBCAppeals: courts’ powersAdan v Newham LBCAli and Nessa v Newham LBCEkwuru v Westminster CCKruja v Enfield LBCTower Hamlets LBC v Deugihomelessness decisions, appeals against:court closed, time limits whereAadan v Brent LBCVan Aken v Camden LBChomelessness decisions, appeals against:date of notification of original review, time running fromDemetri v Westminster CChomelessness decisions, appeals against:defective review decisions, series ofEkwuru v Westminster CChomelessness decisions, appeals against:disabled applicants having problems finding solicitors, time limits whereBarrett v Southwark LBChomelessness decisions, appeals against:extension of timeAadan v Brent LBChomelessness decisions, appeals against:fact-finding role, judges wrongly usurping council’sKruja v Enfield LBChomelessness decisions, appeals against:fair hearing, right to aBegum (Runa) v Tower Hamlets LBCTomlinson v Birmingham CC (Ali v Birmingham CC)homelessness decisions, appeals against:fees, payment of correctAmen v Westminster CChomelessness decisions, appeals against:fraud, wasted costs orders in absence ofR v Lambeth LBC ex p Wilsonhomelessness decisions, appeals against:further review, prescribing conduct ofAdan v Newham LBChomelessness decisions, appeals against:Housing Act 1996, beforeWhich court?homelessness decisions, appeals against:inevitably reached, decisions quashed unless same decision would beAli and Nessa v Newham LBChomelessness decisions, appeals against:injustice, where no obviousGentle v Wandsworth LBChomelessness decisions, appeals against:intentional homelessnessEkwuru v Westminster CChomelessness decisions, appeals against:judicial reviewR (Van der Stolk) v Camden LBChomelessness decisions, appeals against:notification of decisions to agents or applicantsDharmaraj v Hounslow LBChomelessness decisions, appeals against:permission for second appealsAzimi v Newham LBCGentle v Wandsworth LBChomelessness decisions, appeals against:points of lawAppealshomelessness decisions, appeals against:quashing decisionsAli and Nessa v Newham LBCKruja v Enfield LBChomelessness decisions, appeals against:reviews:defective review decisions, series ofEkwuru v Westminster CChomelessness decisions, appeals against:reviews:notification of rightReviewhomelessness decisions, appeals against:reviews:points of lawAppealshomelessness decisions, appeals against:reviews:refusalR v Westminster CC ex p Elliouahomelessness decisions, appeals against:reviews:withdrawn decisions, onTower Hamlets LBC v Deugihomelessness decisions, appeals against:route of appealWhich court?homelessness decisions, appeals against:second appealsSecond appeals: appeals to the Court of AppealAzimi v Newham LBCGentle v Wandsworth LBChomelessness decisions, appeals against:solicitors, problems findingBarrett v Southwark LBChomelessness decisions, appeals against:staying costs orders pending fresh appealsWaltham Forest LBC v Malobahomelessness decisions, appeals against:time limitsAppeals: time limits, bringing an appeal and feesAadan v Brent LBChomelessness decisions, appeals against:time limits:agents or applications, notification of decisions toDharmaraj v Hounslow LBChomelessness decisions, appeals against:time limits:court closed, whereAadan v Brent LBCVan Aken v Camden LBChomelessness decisions, appeals against:time limits:date of notification of original review, time running fromDemetri v Westminster CChomelessness decisions, appeals against:time limits:disabled applicants having problems finding solicitorsBarrett v Southwark LBChomelessness decisions, appeals against:time limits:extensionAadan v Brent LBCBarrett v Southwark LBCShort v Birmingham CChomelessness decisions, appeals against:time limits:final day of limitsVan Aken v Camden LBChomelessness decisions, appeals against:time limits:good reason or good causeBarrett v Southwark LBCShort v Birmingham CChomelessness decisions, appeals against:time limits:judicial reviewR (Van der Stolk) v Camden LBChomelessness decisions, appeals against:wasted costs ordersR v Lambeth LBC ex p Wilsonhomelessness decisions, appeals against:withdrawal of review decisionsTower Hamlets LBC v Deugihomelessness decisions, judicial review of:appeals:pending appeals, discretion to accommodateFrancis v Kensington and Chelsea RLBChomelessness decisions, judicial review of:appeals:time limitsR (Van der Stolk) v Camden LBChomelessness decisions, judicial review of:costsR v Lambeth LBC ex p Wilsonhomelessness decisions, judicial review of:fair hearing, right to aBegum (Runa) v Tower Hamlets LBChomelessness decisions, judicial review of:fraud, wasted costs orders in absence ofR v Lambeth LBC ex p Wilsonhomelessness decisions, judicial review of:pending appeals, discretion to accommodateFrancis v Kensington and Chelsea RLBChomelessness decisions, judicial review of:refusal to reconsider decisions, remedy forR v Westminster CC ex p Elliouahomelessness decisions, judicial review of:reviewsR v Westminster CC ex p ElliouaWhich court?homelessness decisions, judicial review of:time limitsR (Van der Stolk) v Camden LBChomelessness decisions, judicial review of:use of judicial review, comments onR v Hillingdon LBC ex p Puhlhoferhomelessness decisions, judicial review of:wasted costs ordersR v Lambeth LBC ex p Wilsonhomelessness decisions, reasons forReasonsSouth Bucks DC v PorterBernard v Enfield LBCR v Islington LBC ex p HindsR v Westminster CC ex p ErmakovR v Islington LBC ex p OkochaR v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p KassamR v Northampton BC ex p ClarksonR v Wandsworth LBC ex p Dodiahomelessness decisions, reasons for:account of applicants preferred over another, reasons forR v Wandsworth LBC ex p Dodiahomelessness decisions, reasons for:adequacyR v Westminster CC ex p ErmakovR v Islington LBC ex p OkochaR v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p KassamR v Northampton BC ex p ClarksonR v Wandsworth LBC ex p Dodiahomelessness decisions, reasons for:facts from value judgments, separation ofR v Islington LBC ex p Hindshomelessness decisions, reasons for:material matters, letters failed to addressR v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p Kassamhomelessness decisions, reasons for:proper approachSouth Bucks DC v Porterhomelessness decisions, reasons for:quashed decisionsR v Westminster CC ex p ErmakovR v Islington LBC ex p OkochaR v Southwark LBC ex p Dagouhomelessness decisions, reasons for:reasonableness of continued occupationR v Northampton BC ex p Clarksonhomelessness decisions, reasons for:referralsR v Southwark LBC ex p Dagouhomelessness decisions, reasons for:resources, detailed assessment of applicant’sBernard v Enfield LBChomelessness decisions, reasons for:reviewsReviewAkhtar v Birmingham CChomelessness decisions, reasons for:reviews:adverse decisionsDecisionshomelessness decisions, reasons for:reviews:requestsReasonshomelessness decisions, reasons for:reviews:successful, no reasons whereAkhtar v Birmingham CChomelessness decisions, reasons for:successful, no reasons whereAkhtar v Birmingham CChomelessness decisions, reasons for:suitability of property when re-offered after reviewR v Islington LBC ex p Okochahomelessness decisions, reasons for:supplemental reasonsR v Westminster CC ex p Ermakovhomelessness decisions, reasons for:value judgments from facts, separation ofR v Islington LBC ex p Hindshomelessness decisions, reasons for:writingReasonshomelessness decisionsDecisionshomelessness decisions:changes in law, retrospective application ofR v Hackney LBC ex p Khomelessness decisions:deceptionR v Southwark LBC ex p Dagouhomelessness decisions:delayR v Brent LBC ex p Miyangerhomelessness decisions:flawed decisionsR v Beverley BC ex p McPheehomelessness decisions:fraudR v Dacorum DC ex p WalshR v Southwark LBC ex p Dagouhomelessness decisions:general principlesR v Beverley BC ex p McPheeR v Brent LBC ex p MiyangerR (Hammia) v Wandsworth LBChomelessness decisions:intentional homelessnessCrawley BC v Bhomelessness decisions:main housing dutyR v Hackney LBC ex p KR v Brent LBC ex p Sadiqhomelessness decisions:mandamusR v Brent LBC ex p Miyangerhomelessness decisions:mistake of factPorteous v West Dorset DChomelessness decisions:notice to quit before fleeing from domestic violence, requirement for tenant to serveR (Hammia) v Wandsworth LBChomelessness decisions:priority needCrawley BC v BR v Brent LBC ex p Sadiqhomelessness decisions:reconsiderationCrawley BC v BPorteous v West Dorset DCR v Hackney LBC ex p KR v Brent LBC ex p SadiqR v Dacorum DC ex p Walshhomelessness decisions:referralsR v Beverley BC ex p McPheehomelessness decisions:rescissionR v Southwark LBC ex p Dagouhomelessness decisions:retrospectivityR v Hackney LBC ex p Khomelessness decisions:writingDecisionshomelessness enquiriesEnquiriesGreen and Coyne v Croydon LBCPieretti v Enfield LBCR v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p BayaniR v Sevenoaks DC ex p ReynoldsR v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Khatun (Shafia)R v Westminster CC ex p AugustinRobinson v Brent LBCWilliams v Birmingham CCR v Dacorum BC ex p BrownR v Gravesham BC ex p WinchesterR v Hackney LBC ex p DecordovaR v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p SilchenstedtR v Lambeth LBC ex p WaltersR v Nottingham CC ex p CostelloR v Poole BC ex p CooperR v Sedgemoor DC ex p McCarthyR v Westminster CC ex p IqbalR v Woodspring DC ex p WaltersR v Wyre BC ex p JoyceOdunsi v Brent LBChomelessness enquiries:abroad, reasonableness of accommodationR v Westminster CC ex p Augustinhomelessness enquiries:adequacyEnquiriesR v Dacorum BC ex p BrownR v Westminster CC ex p Iqbalhomelessness enquiries:admissions, opportunity to challengeRobinson v Brent LBChomelessness enquiries:affordabilityOdunsi v Brent LBChomelessness enquiries:believed, where it was not put to applicants that account notR v Hackney LBC ex p Decordovahomelessness enquiries:burden on local authoritiesR v Woodspring DC ex p Waltershomelessness enquiries:children, no medical examination ofR v Lambeth LBC ex p Waltershomelessness enquiries:confidentialityR v Poole BC ex p Cooperhomelessness enquiries:death threatsR v Westminster CC ex p Iqbalhomelessness enquiries:disability discriminationPieretti v Enfield LBChomelessness enquiries:explain, giving opportunity toR v Wyre BC ex p Joycehomelessness enquiries:financial circumstancesR v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p Bayanihomelessness enquiries:further enquiriesR v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p Silchenstedthomelessness enquiries:interviewsR v Sevenoaks DC ex p ReynoldsR v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Khatun (Shafia)R v Dacorum BC ex p Brownhomelessness enquiries:medical advisers, reliance on opinions ofR v Lambeth LBC ex p Waltershomelessness enquiries:medical recordsR v Lambeth LBC ex p Waltershomelessness enquiries:notes, without takingR v Dacorum BC ex p Brownhomelessness enquiries:possession ordersGreen and Coyne v Croydon LBChomelessness enquiries:questioning inhibiting applicants from stating caseR v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Khatun (Shafia)homelessness enquiries:reconsiderationR v Lambeth LBC ex p Miahhomelessness enquiries:rent:arrearsGreen and Coyne v Croydon LBCR v Wyre BC ex p Joycehomelessness enquiries:single men with health problems, inadequate enquiries aboutBenson v Lewisham LBChomelessness enquiries:social workers, statements toR v Nottingham CC ex p Costellohomelessness enquiries:suitability of accommodationR v Sedgemoor DC ex p McCarthyhomelessness enquiries:supervisory jurisdictionR v Gravesham BC ex p Winchesterhomelessness enquiries:travelWilliams v Birmingham CChomelessness enquiries:vulnerable personsBenson v Lewisham LBChomelessness reviewsReviewhomelessness reviews:adverse matters put to applicantsLomotey v Enfield LBChomelessness reviews:appeals:defective review decisions, series ofEkwuru v Westminster CChomelessness reviews:appeals:notification of rightReviewhomelessness reviews:appeals:points of lawAppealshomelessness reviews:appeals:refusalR v Westminster CC ex p Elliouahomelessness reviews:appeals:withdrawn decisions, onTower Hamlets LBC v Deugihomelessness reviews:construction of decisionsAbdullah v Westminster CCAbdullah v Westminster CChomelessness reviews:contracting out review functionsDe-Winter Heald v Brent LBChomelessness reviews:defective decisionsRowley v Rugby BCEkwuru v Westminster CChomelessness reviews:delayGoodger v Ealing LBCR (C) v Lewisham LBChomelessness reviews:discretionary power to accommodate, as triggeringRowley v Rugby BChomelessness reviews:duty discharged, review of decisions thatWarsame v Hounslow LBChomelessness reviews:face to face meetings, right toMakisi v Birmingham CC; Yosief v Birmingham CC; Nagi v Birmingham CChomelessness reviews:fairnessFeld v Barnet LBC; Pour v Westminster CCGoodger v Ealing LBChomelessness reviews:files, delay in providing copy of housingGoodger v Ealing LBChomelessness reviews:fraudR v Dacorum DC ex p Walshhomelessness reviews:general principlesAbdullah v Westminster CCDe-Winter Heald v Brent LBCFeld v Barnet LBC; Pour v Westminster CCGoodger v Ealing LBCNzamy v Brent LBCSahardid v Camden LBCSareen v Hackney LBCWarsame v Hounslow LBCAbdullah v Westminster CChomelessness reviews:guidanceRavichandran v Lewisham LBChomelessness reviews:important issues not addressed adequately, whereHall v Wandsworth LBC; Carter v Wandsworth LBChomelessness reviews:inconsistency in reasoningGilby v Westminster CChomelessness reviews:informed of rightDecisionshomelessness reviews:intentional homelessnessGilby v Westminster CChomelessness reviews:judicial reviewR v Westminster CC ex p ElliouaWhich court?homelessness reviews:letters read in broad, commonsense wayNzamy v Brent LBChomelessness reviews:local connection provisionsSareen v Hackney LBChomelessness reviews:merits of decision when extending time, no consideration ofR (Slaiman) v Richmond upon Thames LBChomelessness reviews:‘minded to’ letters, mandatory obligation to sendLambeth LBC v Johnstonhomelessness reviews:mistake of factPorteous v West Dorset DChomelessness reviews:notification of right to reviewWarsame v Hounslow LBChomelessness reviews:oral hearingsLomotey v Enfield LBChomelessness reviews:out of time requestsR (C) v Lewisham LBCR (Slaiman) v Richmond upon Thames LBCAdams v Southwark LBChomelessness reviews:pending review, accommodationR v Camden LBC ex p MohammedR v Newham LBC ex p LumleyR (Abdi) v Lambeth LBCR (Antoine) v Reigate and Banstead DC and First Secretary of StateR (Araya) v Leeds CCR (Hassan) v Croydon LBCR (Paul-Coker) v Southwark LBChomelessness reviews:post and not returned, requests made if sent by ordinaryAdams v Southwark LBChomelessness reviews:procedureReviewhomelessness reviews:reasonsReasonsDecisionsReviewAkhtar v Birmingham CChomelessness reviews:reconsideration of review decisionsR v Westminster CC ex p Elliouahomelessness reviews:refusal to reconsider decisions, remedy forR v Westminster CC ex p Elliouahomelessness reviews:representations:face to face meetings, right toMakisi v Birmingham CC; Yosief v Birmingham CC; Nagi v Birmingham CChomelessness reviews:representations:opportunity to makeLambeth LBC v Johnstonhomelessness reviews:representations:telephone, byMakisi v Birmingham CC; Yosief v Birmingham CC; Nagi v Birmingham CChomelessness reviews:same reviewers, second reviews byFeld v Barnet LBC; Pour v Westminster CChomelessness reviews:second reviews by same reviewersFeld v Barnet LBC; Pour v Westminster CChomelessness reviews:statutory rightReviewhomelessness reviews:suitability of offers and reasonable refusalSahardid v Camden LBCOsseily v Westminster CChomelessness reviews:telephone, representations byMakisi v Birmingham CC; Yosief v Birmingham CC; Nagi v Birmingham CChomelessness reviews:time limitsR (C) v Lewisham LBCR (Slaiman) v Richmond upon Thames LBCAdams v Southwark LBChomelessness reviews:withdrawal of decisionsTower Hamlets LBC v Deugihomelessness reviews:withdrawal of offersOsseily v Westminster CChospitals:commencement of possession proceedingsBarnet Primary Care Trust v Xhospitals:High Court proceedingsBarnet Primary Care Trust v Xhospitals:successionHedgedale Ltd v Hardshospitals:temporary absencesHedgedale Ltd v Hardshostels:exclusive possessionWestminster CC v Clarkehostels:homelessnessRogerson v Wigan MBChostels:Protection from Eviction Act 1977Rogerson v Wigan MBChostels:separate dwelling, let as aWestminster CC v Clarkehot water:deficienciesSarmad v Okellohot water:loss of or no waterFerguson v Joneshotels:harassment and illegal eviction, damages forMehta v Royal Bank of Scotlandhotels:licencesBrillouet v LandlessMehta v Royal Bank of Scotlandhotels:licence/tenancy distinctionBrillouet v Landlesshouseboats:cruise, licence toR v Hillingdon LBC ex p Baxhouseboats:licencesR v Hillingdon LBC ex p Baxhouseboats:moorings, without permanentR v Hillingdon LBC ex p Baxhouseboats:part of land, asMew v Tristmire Limitedhouseholds:allocationR (Kimvono) v Tower Hamlets LBChouseholds:homelessnessPriority needhouseholds:ineligible personsR (Kimvono) v Tower Hamlets LBCHouses in Multiple Occupation (HMOs)Local authority enforcementhousing associations:assured tenanciesAssured tenancy transitional provisionsCrown Estate Commissioners v Governors of the Peabody Trusthousing associations:Crown Estates Commissioners, transfer of property byCrown Estate Commissioners v Governors of the Peabody Trusthousing associations:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings underOzmus v West Hampstead Housing Associationhousing associations:public authorities, asR (Weaver) v London & Quadrant Housing TrustPoplar Housing and Regeneration Community Association Ltd v Donoghuehousing associations:rent arrearsR (Weaver) v London & Quadrant Housing Trusthousing associations:security of tenurePoplar Housing and Regeneration Community Association Ltd v Donoghuehousing benefit :applicants did not know whether HB would cover rent, whereF v Birmingham CChousing benefit :belief that HB would cover rent, consideration ofR v Westminster CC ex p Obeidhousing benefit :delay, good cause forTsfayo v UKhousing benefit :disrepair, damages forWallace v Manchester CChousing benefit :fair hearing, right to aTsfayo v UKhousing benefit :homelessness:intentionalF v Birmingham CCGibbons v Bury MBCR v Westminster CC ex p Obeidhousing benefit :Housing Benefit Review BoardTsfayo v UKhousing benefit :ignorance of housing benefitGibbons v Bury MBChousing benefit :omissionsTsfayo v UKhousing benefit :oppressionRendham Holdings Ltd v Patelhousing benefit :prisoners, sent toSaint v Barking and Dagenham LBChousing benefit :shortfallF v Birmingham CCR v Westminster CC ex p ObeidR v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Kaurhousing benefit :suitability of accommodationR v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Kaurhousing benefit :warrants for possession, setting asideSaint v Barking and Dagenham LBCRendham Holdings Ltd v PatelHousing Health and Safety Rating System (HHSRS)Local authority enforcementHuman Rights Act 1998 :repairing covenantsLee v Leeds CCHuman Rights Act 1998 :security of tenurePoplar Housing and Regeneration Community Association Ltd v Donoghuehumanitarian considerationsR v Wealden DC ex p Wales; R v Lincolnshire CC ex p Atkinsonidentify occupants, injunctions where it is impossible toSouth Cambridgeshire DC v Gammell; Bromley LBC v Maughanignorance of material factsGibbons v Bury MBCR v Exeter CC ex p TranckleR v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p RoufR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Lusi and LusiR v Mole Valley DC ex p BurtonR v Wandsworth LBC ex p RoseR v Westminster CC ex p Obeidillegitimate children, succession ofSheffield CC v Wall (No 2)immigration control, persons subject toEligibilityLekpo-Bozua v Hackney LBCimmoral or illegal purposes, use of dwellings forAnti-social behaviourAbrahams v Wilsonimprisonment :abandonmentKalas v Farmerimprisonment :childrenNew Charter Housing (North) Ltd v Ashcroftimprisonment :committal for contemptSaxby v McKinleyimprisonment :harassment and illegal evictionCivil proceedingsimprisonment :injunctionsBirmingham CC v FlattTower Hamlets LBC v LongWear Valley DC v RobsonSaxby v McKinleyimprisonment :lynch mob behaviour by tenantsTower Hamlets LBC v Longimprisonment :nuisance and annoyanceNew Charter Housing (North) Ltd v Ashcroftimprisonment :settled accommodation and intentional homelessnessStewart v Lambeth LBCimprisonment :vacate premises, failure toTrustee in Bankruptcy of Canty v Cantyimprovements:access to premisesYeomans Row Management Ltd v Bodentien-Meyrickimprovements:covenantsMullaney v Maybourne Grange (Croydon) Management Co LtdHolding and Management Ltd v Property Holding and Investment Trust plcimprovements:damp-proof coursesEyre v McCrackenimprovements:disrepairEyre v McCrackenMcDougall v Easington DCYeomans Row Management Ltd v Bodentien-Meyrickimprovements:noticesLocal authority enforcementimprovements:rent regulationRowe v South West Rent Assessment Panelimprovements:repairs/improvements distinctionMcDougall v Easington DCMullaney v Maybourne Grange (Croydon) Management Co LtdHolding and Management Ltd v Property Holding and Investment Trust plcimprovements:service charges and long leasesMullaney v Maybourne Grange (Croydon) Management Co LtdHolding and Management Ltd v Property Holding and Investment Trust plcin the locality, definition ofManchester CC v Lawlerincome supportR v Shrewsbury and Atcham BC ex p Griffithsinconvenience and discomfort, damages forDamagesinfestation:mice infestationLondon & Quadrant Housing Trust v RiemyinflationDamagesinformal arrangementsThe distinction between tenancies and licences – informal arrangementsErrington v Errington and WoodsMarcroft Wagons Ltd v SmithMeynell Family Properties Ltd v MeynellNunn v DalrympleSharp v McArthurVaughan-Armatrading v SarsahWard v WarnkeRoyal Philanthropic Society v Countyinherent defectsStent v Monmouth DCTargett v Torfaen BCinhuman or degrading treatment :Gypsies and TravellersR (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset Policeinhuman or degrading treatment :interim possession ordersR (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset Policeinjunctions:American Cyanamid principlesLove v Herrityinjunctions:balance of convenienceInjunctions against landlordsinjunctions:childrenBater v Bater; Bater v Greenwich LBCHooton v Liverpool CCinjunctions:committal for contempt 06Howes v HowesO’Neill v MurrayParsons v NasarSaxby v McKinleyinjunctions:curfewMurray v Chief Constable of Lancashireinjunctions:damages, inadequacy ofInjunctions against landlordsinjunctions:disposal of other property owned by tenants, prevention ofFennbend Ltd v Millarinjunctions:disrepairR v Wandsworth County Court ex p MunnInterim injunctionsRedland Bricks Ltd v MorrisParker v Camden LBCHooton v Liverpool CCSheriden v Broadbridgeinjunctions:exceptional circumstancesParker v Camden LBCinjunctions:general principlesRedland Bricks Ltd v Morrisinjunctions:harassment and illegal evictionInjunctions against landlordsLewis v LewisLove v HerrityParsons v NasarPatel v W H Smith (Eziot) Ltdinjunctions:identify occupants, where impossible toSouth Cambridgeshire DC v Gammell; Bromley LBC v Maughaninjunctions:imprisonment for breachSaxby v McKinleyinjunctions:interim injunctionsInjunctions against landlordsinjunctions:interlocutory injunctions and disrepairRedland Bricks Ltd v MorrisParker v Camden LBCHooton v Liverpool CCinjunctions:joint tenantsBater v Bater; Bater v Greenwich LBCinjunctions:mandatory injunctionsR v Wandsworth County Court ex p MunnRedland Bricks Ltd v MorrisParker v Camden LBCinjunctions:Matrimonial Causes Act1973Bater v Bater; Bater v Greenwich LBCinjunctions:named, no requirement for trespassers to beHampshire Waste Services Ltd v Persons Unknowninjunctions:notice to quitBater v Bater; Bater v Greenwich LBCinjunctions:nuisance and annoyanceCanterbury CC v Loweinjunctions:penal notices, endorsement ofR v Wandsworth County Court ex p Munninjunctions:private and family life and home, right to respect forHorie v UKinjunctions:protestorsHampshire Waste Services Ltd v Persons Unknowninjunctions:re-let premises, where landlord hadLove v HerrityParsons v Nasarinjunctions:readmit tenants, injunctions must clearly set out what landlord must do toParsons v Nasarinjunctions:retrospective dispensation with serviceLewis v Lewisinjunctions:security of tenureManchester CC v LawlerInjunctions against tenants and third partiesAccent Foundation Ltd v LeeCaradon DC v PatonManchester CC v LeeMoat Housing Group South Ltd v Harris and HartlessNottingham CC v Zain (a minor)Southwark LBC v StorrieHillingdon LBC v VijayatungaSandwell MBC v Preeceinjunctions:serious disrepairHooton v Liverpool CCinjunctions:serious issue to be triedInjunctions against landlordsinjunctions:service, retrospective dispensation ofLewis v Lewisinjunctions:staircases in danger of collapseSheriden v Broadbridgeinjunctions:suitability of accommodationFennbend Ltd v MillarR (Khan) v Newham LBCinjunctions:trespassersHorie v UKSouth Cambridgeshire DC v Gammell; Bromley LBC v MaughanHampshire Waste Services Ltd v Persons UnknownPatel v W H Smith (Eziot) Ltdinjunctions:unknown personsSouth Cambridgeshire DC v Gammell; Bromley LBC v MaughanHampshire Waste Services Ltd v Persons Unknowninjunctions:urgent casesInterim injunctionsinjunctions against tenantsManchester CC v LawlerInjunctions against tenants and third partiesAccent Foundation Ltd v LeeCaradon DC v PatonManchester CC v LeeMoat Housing Group South Ltd v Harris and HartlessNottingham CC v Zain (a minor)Southwark LBC v StorrieHillingdon LBC v VijayatungaSandwell MBC v Preeceinjunctions against tenants: breach:committalR (James) v HM Prison Birmingham and othersinjunctions against tenants:adjournment of committal proceedingsStafford BC v Haynesinjunctions against tenants:admissionsBarnet LBC v HurstStafford BC v Haynesinjunctions against tenants:anti-social behaviourInjunctions against tenants and third partiesMoat Housing Group South Ltd v Harris and HartlessSwan Housing Association Ltd v GillSandwell MBC v Preeceinjunctions against tenants:appealsMedina Housing Association v Connollyinjunctions against tenants:breachIslington LBC v Doeyinjunctions against tenants:breach:committalInjunctions against tenants and third partiesBarnet LBC v HurstBirmingham CC v FlattGill v Birmingham City CouncilLeicester CC v LewisLonghurst Homes Ltd v KillenManchester CC v McCannManchester CC v WorthingtonMedina Housing Association v ConnollyMiddlesbrough BC v TurnbullNottingham CC v CuttsStafford BC v HaynesTower Hamlets LBC v LongWear Valley DC v Robsoninjunctions against tenants:breach:day of trial, actions onSouth Glamorgan CC v Griffithsinjunctions against tenants:breach:harassmentGill v Birmingham City Councilinjunctions against tenants:breach:preparation timeManchester CC v Worthingtoninjunctions against tenants:breach:sentencingTower Hamlets LBC v Longinjunctions against tenants:breach:written particulars of breachesManchester CC v Worthingtoninjunctions against tenants:business use, covenant againstCaradon DC v Patoninjunctions against tenants:childrenHarrow LBC v Ginjunctions against tenants:committalInjunctions against tenants and third partiesBarnet LBC v HurstBirmingham CC v FlattHillingdon LBC v VijayatungaLeicester CC v LewisLonghurst Homes Ltd v KillenManchester CC v McCannManchester CC v WorthingtonMedina Housing Association v ConnollyMiddlesbrough BC v TurnbullNottingham CC v CuttsR (James) v HM Prison Birmingham and othersStafford BC v HaynesTower Hamlets LBC v LongWear Valley DC v Robsoninjunctions against tenants:contempt of courtInjunctions against tenants and third partiesBarnet LBC v HurstBirmingham CC v FlattLeicester CC v LewisLonghurst Homes Ltd v KillenManchester CC v McCannManchester CC v WorthingtonMedina Housing Association v ConnollyMiddlesbrough BC v TurnbullNottingham CC v CuttsStafford BC v HaynesTower Hamlets LBC v LongWear Valley DC v Robsoninjunctions against tenants:covenantsCaradon DC v PatonHampstead and Suburban Properties v Diomedousinjunctions against tenants:custodial sentencesBirmingham CC v FlattTower Hamlets LBC v LongWear Valley DC v Robsoninjunctions against tenants:damages, discharge of injunctions andSouthwark LBC v Storrieinjunctions against tenants:day of trial, breach by actions onSouth Glamorgan CC v Griffithsinjunctions against tenants:disability discriminationSwan Housing Association Ltd v Gillinjunctions against tenants:dogs, keepingSutton Housing Trust v Lawrenceinjunctions against tenants:enforcementHarrow LBC v Ginjunctions against tenants:gang injunctionsMurray v Chief Constable of LancashireR (James) v HM Prison Birmingham and othersinjunctions against tenants:guidanceMoat Housing Group South Ltd v Harris and Hartlessinjunctions against tenants:hearsay evidenceMoat Housing Group South Ltd v Harris and HartlessWear Valley DC v Robsoninjunctions against tenants:holiday lettingsCaradon DC v Patoninjunctions against tenants:housing-related conduct, meaning ofSwindon BC v Redpathinjunctions against tenants:imprisonmentIslington LBC v Doeyinjunctions against tenants:in the localityManchester CC v LawlerManchester CC v Leeinjunctions against tenants:interim injunctionsHampstead and Suburban Properties v DiomedousMedina Housing Association v Connollyinjunctions against tenants:lynch mob behaviourTower Hamlets LBC v Longinjunctions against tenants:manifest unfairnessNottingham CC v Cuttsinjunctions against tenants:maximum sentences for worst casesMiddlesbrough BC v Turnbullinjunctions against tenants:noticeMoat Housing Group South Ltd v Harris and HartlessSouthwark LBC v StorrieMiddlesbrough BC v Turnbullinjunctions against tenants:nuisanceManchester CC v LeeNottingham CC v Zain (a minor)Islington LBC v Doeyinjunctions against tenants:ouster injunctions, breach ofLeicester CC v Lewisinjunctions against tenants:possession claimsInjunctions against tenants and third partiesinjunctions against tenants:preparation timeManchester CC v Worthingtoninjunctions against tenants:procedural defectsHillingdon LBC v VijayatungaMedina Housing Association v Connollyinjunctions against tenants:public nuisanceNottingham CC v Zain (a minor)injunctions against tenants:sentencing:contempt of courtBarnet LBC v HurstLonghurst Homes Ltd v KillenMiddlesbrough BC v TurnbullNottingham CC v CuttsSandwell MBC v Preeceinjunctions against tenants:sentencing:custodial sentencesBirmingham CC v FlattTower Hamlets LBC v LongWear Valley DC v Robsoninjunctions against tenants:sentencing:hearsayWear Valley DC v Robsoninjunctions against tenants:sentencing:lengthBarnet LBC v Hurstinjunctions against tenants:sentencing:limited admissionsBarnet LBC v Hurstinjunctions against tenants:sentencing:lynch mob behaviourTower Hamlets LBC v Longinjunctions against tenants:sentencing:manifest unfairnessNottingham CC v Cuttsinjunctions against tenants:sentencing:ouster injunctions, breach ofLeicester CC v Lewisinjunctions against tenants:sentencing:suspended sentence, activation ofSandwell MBC v Preeceinjunctions against tenants:sentencing:terrorised, where neighbours areWear Valley DC v Robsoninjunctions against tenants:sentencing:totality, principle ofSandwell MBC v Preeceinjunctions against tenants:sentencing:violenceLonghurst Homes Ltd v Killeninjunctions against tenants:sentencing:worst cases, maximum sentences forMiddlesbrough BC v Turnbullinjunctions against tenants:shopping centresManchester CC v Lawlerinjunctions against tenants:suspended sentences, activation ofSandwell MBC v Preeceinjunctions against tenants:technical nature, procedural defects of aHillingdon LBC v Vijayatungainjunctions against tenants:terrorised, where neighbours areWear Valley DC v Robsoninjunctions against tenants:threats to killNottingham CC v Cuttsinjunctions against tenants:totality in sentencing, principle ofSandwell MBC v Preeceinjunctions against tenants:violence, sentencing where noLonghurst Homes Ltd v Killeninjunctions against tenants:waiverAccent Foundation Ltd v Leeinjunctions against tenants:witnesses, wilful insults toManchester CC v McCanninjunctions against tenants:worst cases, maximum sentences forMiddlesbrough BC v Turnbullinjunctions against tenants:written particulars of breachesManchester CC v WorthingtoninspectionsMorley v Knowsley BCClarke v Taff Ely BCinsuranceWoolwich Building Society v Brownintentional homelessnessIntentional homelessnessReasonable to continue to occupyintentional homelessness:abroad:bringing family fromDin v Wandsworth LBCintentional homelessness:acquiescenceIntentional homelessnessGriffiths v St Helens MBCR v Nottingham CC ex p CaineR v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Khatun (Asma)R v Eastleigh BC ex p Beattie (No 2)R v North Devon DC ex p LewisR v Penwith DC ex p TrevenaR v Swansea CC ex p JohnR v West Dorset DC ex p Phillipsintentional homelessness:adverse material to applicants, puttingHobbs v Sutton LBCintentional homelessness:advice and assistanceR (Nipyo) v Croydon LBCintentional homelessness:appealsEkwuru v Westminster CCintentional homelessness:available, meaning ofAvailableintentional homelessness:blundering/carelessness and dishonesty, difference betweenR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Lusi and Lusiintentional homelessness:business mortgage defaultR v Wandsworth LBC ex p Onwudiweintentional homelessness:business ventures, prospects ofR v Exeter CC ex p Tranckleintentional homelessness:causationCausation and settled accommodationBratton v Croydon LBCDenton v Southwark LBCDyson v Kerrier DCKnight v Vale Royal BCMinchin v Sheffield CCMohamed v Westminster CCR v Gloucester CC ex p MilesSteward v Kingston upon Thames RLBCStewart v Lambeth LBCWatchman v Ipswich BCR v Basingstoke and Deane BC ex p BassettR v Croydon LBC ex p EasomR v Hackney LBC ex p AjayiR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p PR v Hounslow LBC ex p RR v Merton LBC ex p RuffleR v Newham LBC ex p CampbellR v Shrewsbury and Atcham BC ex p GriffithsR v Westminster CC ex p ReidR v Kyle and Carrick DC ex p Robsonintentional homelessness:ceasing to occupy accommodationCease to occupy accommodationLee-Lawrence v Penwith DCR v Wandsworth LBC ex p OtengR v Westminster CC ex p De SouzaR v Westminster CC ex p Khanintentional homelessness:collusionIntentional homelessnessintentional homelessness:continued occupation, reasonableness ofReasonable to continue to occupy: s175(3)Noh v Hammersmith and Fulham LBCR v Brent LBC ex p YusufReasonable to continue to occupyintentional homelessness:date:last period of settled accommodationDin v Wandsworth LBCintentional homelessness:date:left, when accommodation isDin v Wandsworth LBCintentional homelessness:date:materialDin v Wandsworth LBCintentional homelessness:definition of intentional homelessnessIntentional homelessnessintentional homelessness:deliberate acts or omissionsDeliberate act or omissionintentional homelessness:discharge of dutyR (Conville) v Richmond upon Thames LBCR (Nipyo) v Croydon LBCintentional homelessness:duration of accommodationR (Conville) v Richmond upon Thames LBCintentional homelessness:employment with accommodation, loss ofR v Winchester CC ex p Ashtonintentional homelessness:evidenceR v Eastleigh BC ex p Beattie (No 2)R v Swansea CC ex p JohnR v West Dorset DC ex p Phillipsintentional homelessness:false statementsRushcliffe BC v WatsonShrewsbury and Atcham BC v Evansintentional homelessness:families from abroad, bringingR v Hillingdon LBC ex p Islamintentional homelessness:fraudR v Barnet LBC ex p Rughooputhintentional homelessness:good faithDeliberate act or omissionAw-Aden v Birmingham CCF v Birmingham CCGibbons v Bury MBCHobbs v Sutton LBCO’Connor v Kensington and Chelsea RLBCR v Barnet LBC ex p RughooputhR v Exeter CC ex p TranckleR v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p RoufR v Wandsworth LBC ex p OnwudiweR v Winchester CC ex p AshtonR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Lusi and LusiR v Mole Valley DC ex p BurtonR v Wandsworth LBC ex p RoseR v Westminster CC ex p Obeidintentional homelessness:honest blunderingR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Lusi and Lusiintentional homelessness:housing benefitF v Birmingham CCGibbons v Bury MBCR v Westminster CC ex p Obeidintentional homelessness:ignorance of material factsGibbons v Bury MBCR v Exeter CC ex p TranckleR v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p RoufR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Lusi and LusiR v Mole Valley DC ex p BurtonR v Wandsworth LBC ex p RoseR v Westminster CC ex p Obeidintentional homelessness:inconsistency in reasoningGilby v Westminster CCintentional homelessness:interests in property never occupied by applicant, disposal ofR v Westminster CC ex p De Souzaintentional homelessness:knowledge of riskR v Wandsworth LBC ex p Onwudiweintentional homelessness:left, when accommodation isDin v Wandsworth LBCintentional homelessness:manage affairs, applicants capacity toHijazi v Kensington and Chelsea RLBCR v Wirral MBC ex p Bellintentional homelessness:material dateDin v Wandsworth LBCintentional homelessness:medical evidence on capacityHijazi v Kensington and Chelsea RLBCintentional homelessness:mortgages:business mortgage defaultR v Wandsworth LBC ex p Onwudiweintentional homelessness:mortgages:failure to pay instalmentsWilliam v Wandsworth LBC; Bellamy v Hounslow LBCintentional homelessness:mortgages:fraudR v Barnet LBC ex p Rughooputhintentional homelessness:mortgages:remortgage to pay instalments, failure to use money fromWilliam v Wandsworth LBC; Bellamy v Hounslow LBCintentional homelessness:never lived in property, where applicantsR v Westminster CC ex p Khanintentional homelessness:never to have moved in, where applicants claimLee-Lawrence v Penwith DCintentional homelessness:no real prospect of finding intentionalityEkwuru v Westminster CCintentional homelessness:nuisanceGriffiths v St Helens MBCR v Swansea CC ex p Johnintentional homelessness:omissionsDeliberate act or omissionintentional homelessness:parents, ignorance of unsatisfactory nature of accommodation withR v Wandsworth LBC ex p Roseintentional homelessness:personal circumstancesNoh v Hammersmith and Fulham LBCintentional homelessness:pregnant women living property unsuitable for babiesR v Brent LBC ex p Yusufintentional homelessness:priority needCrawley BC v Bintentional homelessness:psychiatric evidenceNoh v Hammersmith and Fulham LBCintentional homelessness:reasonablenessR v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p RoufReasonable to continue to occupyintentional homelessness:reconciliation with partner after termination of tenanciesR v Penwith DC ex p Trevenaintentional homelessness:refusal of offersCease to occupy accommodationintentional homelessness:rehousing, inaccurate assurances ofR v Mole Valley DC ex p Burtonintentional homelessness:remortgage, failure to use money fromWilliam v Wandsworth LBC; Bellamy v Hounslow LBCintentional homelessness:rentR v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Khatun (Asma)intentional homelessness:resources, regard toR (Conville) v Richmond upon Thames LBCintentional homelessness:reviewsGilby v Westminster CCintentional homelessness:sale, ceasing to occupy beforeR v Wandsworth LBC ex p Otengintentional homelessness:settled accommodationIntentional homelessnessDin v Wandsworth LBCR v Brent LBC ex p AwuaCausation and settled accommodationBratton v Croydon LBCDenton v Southwark LBCDyson v Kerrier DCKnight v Vale Royal BCMinchin v Sheffield CCMohamed v Westminster CCR v Gloucester CC ex p MilesSteward v Kingston upon Thames RLBCStewart v Lambeth LBCWatchman v Ipswich BCR v Basingstoke and Deane BC ex p BassettR v Croydon LBC ex p EasomR v Hackney LBC ex p AjayiR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p PR v Hounslow LBC ex p RR v Merton LBC ex p RuffleR v Newham LBC ex p CampbellR v Shrewsbury and Atcham BC ex p GriffithsR v Westminster CC ex p ReidR v Kyle and Carrick DC ex p Robsonintentional homelessness:spouses:decisions to other spouses, leavingR v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Khatun (Asma)intentional homelessness:spouses:reconciliation with partner after termination of tenanciesR v Penwith DC ex p Trevenaintentional homelessness:testDeliberate act or omissionintentional homelessness:vulnerable persons’ capacity to manage own affairsHijazi v Kensington and Chelsea RLBCR v Wirral MBC ex p Bellintentional homelessness:without accommodation, bringing family from abroadR v Hillingdon LBC ex p Islamintentional homelessness:work in UK, prospects of findingAw-Aden v Birmingham CCinterest:claimsBristol and West plc v BartlettScottish Equitable v Thompsoninterest:ratesRahman v Sterling Credit LtdConsumer Credit Act 1974Paragon Finance Ltd v Nash; Paragon Finance plc v StauntonCedar Holdings v Jenkinsinterest:service charges and long leasesBoldmark Ltd v Coheninterim accommodation duties and powers for homeless:blanket same day policiesR (Khazai) v Birmingham CCinterim accommodation duties and powers for homeless:local connection and referralMohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham LBCinterim accommodation duties and powers for homeless:pending appeals, discretion to accommodateBrookes v Croydon LBCFrancis v Kensington and Chelsea RLBCLewis v Havering LBCR v Brighton and Hove Council ex p Nacioninterim accommodation duties and powers for homeless:pending decisions, duty to accommodateMohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham LBCinterim accommodation duties and powers for homeless:pending reviews, discretion to accommodateMohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham LBCR v Camden LBC ex p MohammedR v Newham LBC ex p LumleyR (Abdi) v Lambeth LBCR (Antoine) v Reigate and Banstead DC and First Secretary of StateR (Araya) v Leeds CCR (Hassan) v Croydon LBCR (Paul-Coker) v Southwark LBCinterim accommodation duties and powers for homeless:suitability of accommodationR (Flash) v Southwark LBCinterim accommodation duties and powers for homeless:system failuresR (Anonymous) v Southwark LBCR (Kelly) v Birmingham CCinterim possession ordersInterim possession orders and removal directionsMetropolitan Housing Trust v Ali and Persons UnknownR v Wealden DC ex p Wales; R v Lincolnshire CC ex p AtkinsonR v Wolverhampton MBC ex p DunneR (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset PoliceShropshire CC v WynneWard v Hillingdon LBCinterim possession orders:asked to leave, notice invalid where travellers not firstR (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset Policeinterim possession orders:Civil Procedure RulesInterim possession orders and removal directionsinterim possession orders:conditions satisfied, no discretion whereMetropolitan Housing Trust v Ali and Persons Unknowninterim possession orders:criminal offencesInterim possession orders and removal directionsinterim possession orders:directions for removalR v Wealden DC ex p Wales; R v Lincolnshire CC ex p Atkinsoninterim possession orders:discretionMetropolitan Housing Trust v Ali and Persons UnknownShropshire CC v Wynneinterim possession orders:fair hearing, right to aR (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset Policeinterim possession orders:formalities, not merits, consideration ofR v Wolverhampton MBC ex p Dunneinterim possession orders:Gypsies and Travellers:asked to leave, notice invalid where travellers not firstR (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset Policeinterim possession orders:Gypsies and Travellers:directions for removalR v Wealden DC ex p Wales; R v Lincolnshire CC ex p Atkinsoninterim possession orders:Gypsies and Travellers:fair hearing, right to aR (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset Policeinterim possession orders:Gypsies and Travellers:formalities, not merits, consideration ofR v Wolverhampton MBC ex p Dunneinterim possession orders:Gypsies and Travellers:humanitarian and statutory considerationsR v Wealden DC ex p Wales; R v Lincolnshire CC ex p Atkinsoninterim possession orders:Gypsies and Travellers:inhuman or degrading treatmentR (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset Policeinterim possession orders:Gypsies and Travellers:personal circumstances after making orders, enquiries intoR v Wolverhampton MBC ex p Dunneinterim possession orders:Gypsies and Travellers:private and family life and home, right to respect forR (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset PoliceWard v Hillingdon LBCinterim possession orders:Gypsies and Travellers:review decisions, no discretion toShropshire CC v Wynneinterim possession orders:humanitarian considerationsR v Wealden DC ex p Wales; R v Lincolnshire CC ex p Atkinsoninterim possession orders:inhuman or degrading treatmentR (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset Policeinterim possession orders:personal circumstances after making orders, enquiries intoR v Wolverhampton MBC ex p Dunneinterim possession orders:private and family life and home, right to respect forR (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset PoliceWard v Hillingdon LBCinterim possession orders:removal directionsWard v Hillingdon LBCinterim possession orders:review decisions, no discretion toShropshire CC v Wynneinterim possession orders:statutory considerationsR v Wealden DC ex p Wales; R v Lincolnshire CC ex p Atkinsoninterim possession orders:trespassersIntroductionintermittent and temporary occupationDavies v Petersoninternally displaced persons, delay in eviction ofMirzayev v Azerbaijaninterviews:necessityR v Sevenoaks DC ex p Reynoldsinterviews:notes, without takingR v Dacorum BC ex p Browninterviews:questioning inhibiting applicants from stating caseR v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Khatun (Shafia)interviews:sympathetically, to be conductedR v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Khatun (Shafia)introductory tenanciesIntroductory tenanciesCardiff CC v StoneSalford CC v GarnerR (Chowdhury) v Newham LBCR (Forbes) v Lambeth LBCR (Laporte) v Newham LBCR (McDonagh) v Salisbury DCintroductory tenancies:additional grounds for reviewsR (Laporte) v Newham LBCintroductory tenancies:assured tenanciesIntroductory tenanciesintroductory tenancies:claim forms, issue ofSalford CC v Garnerintroductory tenancies:commencement of proceedingsSalford CC v Garnerintroductory tenancies:conditions, breach ofCardiff CC v Stoneintroductory tenancies:hearings, validity ofR (McDonagh) v Salisbury DCintroductory tenancies:keys handed over, tenancies started whenSalford CC v Garnerintroductory tenancies:licencesIntroductory tenanciesintroductory tenancies:noticeCardiff CC v StoneR (Laporte) v Newham LBCintroductory tenancies:nullity, reviews as not being aR (McDonagh) v Salisbury DCintroductory tenancies:possession proceedings, continuance ofR (McDonagh) v Salisbury DCintroductory tenancies:probationary tenancies, areIntroductory tenanciesintroductory tenancies:reasons, change ofR (Forbes) v Lambeth LBCintroductory tenancies:registered social landlords, tenants ofIntroductory tenanciesintroductory tenancies:reviewsCardiff CC v StoneR (Forbes) v Lambeth LBCR (Laporte) v Newham LBCR (McDonagh) v Salisbury DCintroductory tenancies:second noticesCardiff CC v Stoneintroductory tenancies:secure tenanciesIntroductory tenanciesintroductory tenancies:security of tenureIntroductory tenanciesintroductory tenancies:serviceR (Laporte) v Newham LBCintroductory tenancies:trial period, duration ofIntroductory tenanciesintroductory tenancies:unsuitable, councils entitled to make judgments that tenantsR (Chowdhury) v Newham LBCinvitation to treatBattersea Churches Housing Trust v HunteirrationalityR (Maali) v Lambeth LBCisolated accommodationKacar v Enfield LBCJoint tenants: residence requirementSolihull MBC v Hickinjoint tenants:assignmentBurton v Camden LBCjoint tenants:breach of trustGreenwich LBC v McGradyjoint tenants:disrepair, damages forO’Beirne v Lambeth LBCjoint tenants:excluding other tenants, ordersHarrow LBC v Johnstonejoint tenants:injunctionsBater v Bater; Bater v Greenwich LBCjoint tenants:landlord conditionR v Plymouth CC and Cornwall CC ex p Freemanjoint tenants:licence/tenancy distinctionAG Securities v VaughanAntoniades v Villiers and Bridgerjoint tenants:notice to quitHammersmith and Fulham LBC v MonkHarrow LBC v Johnstonejoint tenants:notice to quit:breach of trustGreenwich LBC v McGradyjoint tenants:notice to quit:excluding other tenants, ordersHarrow LBC v Johnstonejoint tenants:notice to quit:injunctionsBater v Bater; Bater v Greenwich LBCjoint tenants:notice to quit:serviceHammersmith and Fulham LBC v MonkGreenwich LBC v McGradyNotting Hill Housing Trust v Brackleyjoint tenants:notice to quit:termination of tenanciesHammersmith and Fulham LBC v MonkHarrow LBC v Johnstonejoint tenants:notice to quit:trusts for sale, breach ofGreenwich LBC v McGradyjoint tenants:notice to quit:waiver clausesNotting Hill Housing Trust v Brackleyjoint tenants:part tenancies, transfer ofGay v Sheeranjoint tenants:service of notice to quitHammersmith and Fulham LBC v MonkGreenwich LBC v McGradyNotting Hill Housing Trust v Brackleyjoint tenants:subtenanciesGay v Sheeranjoint tenants:successionBassetlaw DC v Renshawjoint tenants:surrenderLeek and Moorlands Building Society v Clarkjoint tenants:survivorshipTennant v Huttonjoint tenants:termination of tenanciesHammersmith and Fulham LBC v MonkHarrow LBC v Johnstonejoint tenants:transfersGay v Sheeranjoint tenants:trusts for sale, breach ofGreenwich LBC v McGradyjoint tenants:waiver clausesNotting Hill Housing Trust v Brackleyjudicial review:allocationGeneraljudicial review:eviction decisionsAdministrative law and human rights defencesjudicial review:fair hearing, right to aTsfayo v UKjudicial review:omissionsTsfayo v UKjudicial review:public health and environmental protectionR v Mansfield DC ex p Ashfield Nomineeskeys:commencement of tenancies when keys handed overSalford CC v Garnerkeys:exclusive possessionAslan v Murphy (No 1)keys:key-holders as not being secure tenantsBrent LBC v Charleskeys:surrender by handing over keysBolnore Properties Ltd v CobbLaine v CadwalladerProudreed Ltd v Microgen Holdings plcZionmor v Islington LBCkeys:wrecked room as not being reinstatement, offer of keys toTagro v Cafane and Patelkitchens:toilets next to kitchensBirmingham CC v Oakleyknowledge:Defective Premises Act 1972Morley v Knowsley BCClarke v Taff Ely BCknowledge:disrepairNotice and delay in carrying out repairsO’Brien v RobinsonDinefwr BC v JonesStockley v Knowsley MBCknowledge:frozen pipesStockley v Knowsley MBCknowledge:inspectionsMorley v Knowsley BCknowledge:intentional homelessnessR v Wandsworth LBC ex p Onwudiwelabels and licence/tenancy distinctionEastleigh BC v WalshFamily Housing Association v Joneslagging pipesWycombe Area Health Authority v Barnettlandlord condition:change of landlordKnowles Housing Association v Millarlandlord condition:fully mutual co-operative tenanciesAli Bhai and Cabare v Black Roof CHA Ltdlandlord condition:joint tenanciesR v Plymouth CC and Cornwall CC ex p Freemanlandlord condition:ScotlandKnowles Housing Association v Millarlandlord condition:secure tenanciesAli Bhai and Cabare v Black Roof CHA LtdBanjo v Brent LBCKnowles Housing Association v Millarlandlord condition:security of tenureThe landlord conditionAli Bhai and Cabare v Black Roof CHA LtdBanjo v Brent LBCR v Plymouth CC and Cornwall CC ex p FreemanKnowles Housing Association v Millarlandlord condition:will, tenancies atBanjo v Brent LBClandlords:characterBruton v London and Quadrant Housing Trustlandlords:definitionHousing Act 1988 ss27 and 28Francis v BrownJones v Miahlandlords:landlord conditionAli Bhai and Cabare v Black Roof CHA LtdBanjo v Brent LBCR v Plymouth CC and Cornwall CC ex p FreemanKnowles Housing Association v Millarlandlords:resident landlordResident landlords (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 10 and Rent Act 1977 s12)Bardrick v HaycockBarnes v GoresuchCooper v TaitGriffiths v EnglishJackson v PekicLewis-Graham v ConacherO’Sullivan v BarnettPalmer v McNamaraWolff v Waddingtonlandlords or members of family, premises required forPremises required for landlord or member of family (Rent Act 1977 Sch 15 Case 9)Alexander v MohamadzadehAmaddio v DaltonBaker v MacIverBassett v FraserBostock v Tacher de la PagerieCoombes v ParryEvans v EngelsonGhelani v BowieHodges v BleeKidder v BirchManaton v EdwardsMansukhani v Sharkeylandlords or members of family, premises required for:alternative accommodationAlexander v MohamadzadehBaker v MacIverBassett v FraserCoombes v Parrylandlords or members of family, premises required for:burden of proofHodges v Bleelandlords or members of family, premises required for:companies owned by landlords, property acquired fromEvans v Engelsonlandlords or members of family, premises required for:compensation for former tenants after saleClements v Simmondslandlords or members of family, premises required for:evidence of attempts to find other accommodationAlexander v Mohamadzadehlandlords or members of family, premises required for:future, need for accommodation in ascertainableKidder v Birchlandlords or members of family, premises required for:gifts, landlords who have received property asMansukhani v Sharkeylandlords or members of family, premises required for:grounds for possessionPremises required for landlord or member of family (Rent Act 1977 Sch 15 Case 9)Alexander v MohamadzadehAmaddio v DaltonBaker v MacIverBassett v FraserBostock v Tacher de la PagerieCoombes v ParryEvans v EngelsonGhelani v BowieHodges v BleeKidder v BirchManaton v EdwardsMansukhani v Sharkeylandlords or members of family, premises required for:hardshipBaker v MacIverHodges v Bleelandlords or members of family, premises required for:illegitimate sons of joint ownersPotsos v Theodotoulandlords or members of family, premises required for:intention to occupyRowe v TrueloveDavies v PetersonKennealy v DunneLipton v Whitworthlandlords or members of family, premises required for:intermittent and temporary occupationDavies v PetersonMistry v Isidorelandlords or members of family, premises required for:investment propertiesGhelani v Bowielandlords or members of family, premises required for:joint ownersMcIntyre v HardcastleTilling v Whitemanlandlords or members of family, premises required for:judicial notice of difficult in finding furnished accommodationBassett v Fraserlandlords or members of family, premises required for:just and equitable to dispense with noticeBradshaw and Martyn v Baldwin-WisemanWhite v Joneslandlords or members of family, premises required for:landlords finding accommodation, consideration ofCoombes v Parrylandlords or members of family, premises required for:new houses abroad, landlords intending to buildBissessar v Ghosnlandlords or members of family, premises required for:noticeBradshaw and Martyn v Baldwin-WisemanFernandes v ParvardinWhite v Joneslandlords or members of family, premises required for:oral notice to tenantsFernandes v ParvardinWhite v Joneslandlords or members of family, premises required for:part share, inheritance ofThomas v Fryerlandlords or members of family, premises required for:permanence of occupationNaish v Curzonlandlords or members of family, premises required for:personal representativesPatel v Patellandlords or members of family, premises required for:previous occupation as being intermittent and temporaryMistry v Isidorelandlords or members of family, premises required for:purchase, landlords byAmaddio v DaltonThomas v Fryerlandlords or members of family, premises required for:rehousing by councilManaton v Edwardslandlords or members of family, premises required for:Rent Act tenanciesOwner-occupiersPremises required for landlord or member of family (Rent Act 1977 Sch 15 Case 9)Alexander v MohamadzadehAmaddio v DaltonBaker v MacIverBassett v FraserBostock v Tacher de la PagerieCoombes v ParryEvans v EngelsonGhelani v BowieHodges v BleeKidder v BirchManaton v EdwardsMansukhani v Sharkeylandlords or members of family, premises required for:sale:compensation for former tenantsClements v Simmondslandlords or members of family, premises required for:sale:intention to live in property until saleRowe v TrueloveLipton v Whitworthlandlords or members of family, premises required for:sale:new houses abroad, landlords intending to buildBissessar v Ghosnlandlords or members of family, premises required for:tenants in common, premises required for equitableBostock v Tacher de la Pagerielandlords or members of family, premises required for:visits to partners not amounting to occupationIbie v Trubshawlanguage:possession proceedings, adjournment ofVerrilli v Idigoraslanguage:translation of offer lettersAli v Birmingham CClaundry of bed linenNelson Developments Ltd v Taboadalegal aid:possession proceedings, adjournment ofBates v Croydon LBClegal representation in possession proceedingsBates v Croydon LBCVerrilli v Idigoraslegitimate expectationsVeselinski v Former Yugoslav Republic of MacedoniaR (Bibi (No 1) and Al-Nashed) v Newham LBCletters:broad, commonsense way, letters to be read in aNzamy v Brent LBCletters:clear explanations of offersGriffiths v St Helens Councilletters:disrepair, notice ofAl Hassani v Merriganletters:homelessnessR v Chiltern DC ex p RobertsNzamy v Brent LBCLambeth LBC v JohnstonAdams v Southwark LBCAli v Birmingham CCGriffiths v St Helens Councilletters:material matters, letters failed to addressR v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p Kassamletters:‘minded to’ letters, mandatory obligation to sendLambeth LBC v Johnstonletters:new tenancies, interpreted asEpping Forest DC v Pomphrettletters:post and not returned, requests made if sent by ordinaryAdams v Southwark LBCletters:successionEpping Forest DC v Pomphrettletters:surrenderBrent LBC v Sharma and Vyasletters:transfers of tenancies, letters from tenants regardingBrent LBC v Sharma and Vyasletters:translation of offer lettersAli v Birmingham CCLettings Direct Scheme, referrals toR (Raw) v Lambeth LBClicences:buying other flat, loss onTyler v Kensington and Chelsea RLBClicences:contingent on tenancy of other flat, whereTyler v Kensington and Chelsea RLBClicences:cruise, licence of houseboats toR v Hillingdon LBC ex p Baxlicences:damages for harassment and illegal evictionMehta v Royal Bank of Scotlandlicences:definitionThe distinction between tenancies and licences – generallylicences:exclusive possessionMansfield DC v Langridgelicences:harassmentKhorasandjian v BushMehta v Royal Bank of Scotlandlicences:homelessness:cruise, licence of houseboats toR v Hillingdon LBC ex p Baxlicences:homelessness:houseboat owners without permanent mooringsR v Hillingdon LBC ex p Baxlicences:homelessness:leave, where asked to leaveR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p O’Sullivanlicences:homelessness:Protection from Eviction Act 1977Desnousse v Newham LBClicences:homelessness:unprotected licenseesR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p O’Sullivanlicences:hostelsRogerson v Wigan MBClicences:hotel roomsMehta v Royal Bank of Scotlandlicences:houseboat owners without permanent mooringsR v Hillingdon LBC ex p Baxlicences:housing associationsIslington LBC v Greenlicences:illegal eviction, damages forMehta v Royal Bank of Scotlandlicences:introductory tenanciesIntroductory tenancieslicences:leave, where asked to leaveR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p O’Sullivanlicences:possessionCamden LBC v Shortlife Community Housing Ltd and Otherslicences:private sectorTower Hamlets LBC v Miahlicences:Protection from Eviction Act 1977Protection from Eviction Act 1977 (civil provisions)Desnousse v Newham LBCRogerson v Wigan MBClicences:rentMansfield DC v Langridgelicences:separate dwelling, let as aMansfield DC v LangridgeParkins v Westminster CCTyler v Kensington and Chelsea RLBClicences:shared council housingMonmouth BC v MarlogParkins v Westminster CClicences:subtenanciesIslington LBC v GreenMonmouth BC v MarlogCamden LBC v Shortlife Community Housing Ltd and Otherslicences:surrender by moving outBone v Bonelicences:telephone calls, harassment byKhorasandjian v Bushlicences:trespassersManchester Airport plc v Duttonlicences:unprotected licenseesR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p O’Sullivanlicences granted to employeesLicences – occupation granted to employeesNorris v ChecksfieldPostcastle Properties v PerridgeRoyal Philanthropic Society v Countylicences granted to employees:assured tenanciesLicences – occupation granted to employeeslicences granted to employees:change of ownersPostcastle Properties v Perridgelicences granted to employees:exclusive possessionLicences – occupation granted to employeeslicences granted to employees:factual nexus between occupation and employmentNorris v Checksfieldlicences granted to employees:informal arrangementsRoyal Philanthropic Society v Countylicences granted to employees:low rent under informal arrangementsRoyal Philanthropic Society v Countylicences granted to employees:notice to quit when employment terminatedNorris v Checksfieldlicences granted to employees:possessionLicences – occupation granted to employeeslicences granted to employees:Rent Act tenanciesLicences – occupation granted to employeeslicences granted to employees:service tenanciesLicences – occupation granted to employeeslicences granted to employees:termination of employmentNorris v ChecksfieldPostcastle Properties v Perridgelicence/tenancy distinctionThe distinction between tenancies and licences – generallyBruton v London and Quadrant Housing TrustEastleigh BC v WalshStreet v MountfordAshburn Anstalt v ArnoldAslan v Murphy (No 1)Brennan v Lambeth LBCBretherton v PatonBrillouet v LandlessCrancour Ltd v Da SilvaesaFamily Housing Association v JonesGray v TaylorHuwyler v RuddyNutt v ReadSkipton Building Society v ClaytonKirby v LynchMew v Tristmire Limitedlicence/tenancy distinction:almshousesGray v Taylorlicence/tenancy distinction:artificially separate licence agreementsAntoniades v Villiers and Bridgerlicence/tenancy distinction:chalets, mistake concerning agreements to buyNutt v Readlicence/tenancy distinction:character of landlord, irrelevance ofBruton v London and Quadrant Housing Trustlicence/tenancy distinction:contracts of saleBretherton v Patonlicence/tenancy distinction:exceptional circumstances rebutting presumption of tenancySharp v McArthurlicence/tenancy distinction:exclusive possessionBruton v London and Quadrant Housing TrustAslan v Murphy (No 1)Brillouet v LandlessSkipton Building Society v ClaytonNunn v DalrympleAG Securities v Vaughanlicence/tenancy distinction:extreme, terms of licence as beingCrancour Ltd v Da Silvaesalicence/tenancy distinction:family relationshipsErrington v Errington and WoodsMarcroft Wagons Ltd v SmithMeynell Family Properties Ltd v MeynellNunn v DalrympleWard v Warnkelicence/tenancy distinction:hallmarks of tenancies, presence ofKirby v Lynchlicence/tenancy distinction:harassment and illegal evictionCivil proceedingslicence/tenancy distinction:homeless personsBrennan v Lambeth LBCFamily Housing Association v Joneslicence/tenancy distinction:hotelsBrillouet v Landlesslicence/tenancy distinction:houseboatsMew v Tristmire Limitedlicence/tenancy distinction:individual rooms, exclusive possession ofAG Securities v Vaughanlicence/tenancy distinction:informal arrangementsThe distinction between tenancies and licences – informal arrangementsErrington v Errington and WoodsMarcroft Wagons Ltd v SmithMeynell Family Properties Ltd v MeynellNunn v DalrympleSharp v McArthurVaughan-Armatrading v SarsahWard v Warnkelicence/tenancy distinction:intentionKirby v LynchErrington v Errington and WoodsMarcroft Wagons Ltd v SmithMeynell Family Properties Ltd v Meynelllicence/tenancy distinction:joint tenanciesAG Securities v VaughanAntoniades v Villiers and Bridgerlicence/tenancy distinction:keys, exclusive possession ofAslan v Murphy (No 1)licence/tenancy distinction:labelsEastleigh BC v WalshFamily Housing Association v Joneslicence/tenancy distinction:leave room for 90 mins a day, requirement toAslan v Murphy (No 1)licence/tenancy distinction:licence, definition ofThe distinction between tenancies and licences – generallylicence/tenancy distinction:mistakeNutt v Readlicence/tenancy distinction:moved, provisions enabling persons to beBrennan v Lambeth LBClicence/tenancy distinction:non-exclusive occupation agreementsThe distinction between tenancies and licences – ‘non-exclusive occupation agreements’AG Securities v VaughanAntoniades v Villiers and Bridgerlicence/tenancy distinction:prospective purchasers where no binding contract of saleBretherton v Patonlicence/tenancy distinction:rebuttal of presumption of tenancySharp v McArthurlicence/tenancy distinction:rentNunn v DalrympleWard v Warnkelicence/tenancy distinction:security of tenureThe distinction between tenancies and licences – generallylicence/tenancy distinction:services, contractual right toHuwyler v Ruddylicence/tenancy distinction:shamsAslan v Murphy (No 1)Crancour Ltd v Da Silvaesalicence/tenancy distinction:shared accommodation as joint tenanciesAG Securities v VaughanAntoniades v Villiers and Bridgerlicence/tenancy distinction:staying onMarcroft Wagons Ltd v SmithVaughan-Armatrading v Sarsahlicence/tenancy distinction:subjective intention of landlordsKirby v Lynchlicence/tenancy distinction:subtenants’ staying on after termination of head leasesVaughan-Armatrading v Sarsahlicence/tenancy distinction:titleBruton v London and Quadrant Housing Trustlicence/tenancy distinction:trust, beneficiaries under aGray v Taylorlife, right toArticle 2: Right to lifeBudayeva v Russialifts:maintenanceBerryman v Hounslow LBCElectricity Supply Nominees Ltd v National Magazine Co Ltdlifts:rent, reference toElectricity Supply Nominees Ltd v National Magazine Co Ltdlifts:repairing covenantsElectricity Supply Nominees Ltd v National Magazine Co Ltdlights:bathroomsSymons v Warrenlocal connection and referral, homelessness andLocal connection and referralAl-Ameri v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC; Osmani v Harrow LBCMohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham LBCRe BettsOzbek v Ipswich BCR v Greenwich LBC ex p PattersonR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p AvdicR v Ealing LBC ex p FoxR v East Devon DC ex p RobbR v Islington LBC ex p AdigunR (Bantamagbari) v Westminster CC and Southwark LBClocal connection and referral, homelessness and:asylum seekersLocal connection and referralAl-Ameri v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC; Osmani v Harrow LBClocal connection and referral, homelessness and:choice, residence ofAl-Ameri v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC; Osmani v Harrow LBClocal connection and referral, homelessness and:conditionsLocal connection and referrallocal connection and referral, homelessness and:date of decisions/reviewsMohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham LBClocal connection and referral, homelessness and:delay in challenging referring authority’s decisionR (Bantamagbari) v Westminster CC and Southwark LBClocal connection and referral, homelessness and:discharge of dutyR v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Ali and Bibilocal connection and referral, homelessness and:discretionLocal connection and referralR v East Devon DC ex p Robblocal connection and referral, homelessness and:dispute resolutionLocal connection and referrallocal connection and referral, homelessness and:domestic violence, errors in deciding applicants do not run risk ofR v Islington LBC ex p Adigunlocal connection and referral, homelessness and:employment includes unpaid workR v Ealing LBC ex p Foxlocal connection and referral, homelessness and:family associationsOzbek v Ipswich BCR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Avdiclocal connection and referral, homelessness and:guidelinesLocal connection and referralRe BettsR v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Camden LBClocal connection and referral, homelessness and:interim accommodationMohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham LBClocal connection and referral, homelessness and:lawfully in UK, duties owed to all personsR v Hillingdon LBC ex p Streetinglocal connection and referral, homelessness and:Local Authority Agreement, guidelines inRe Bettslocal connection and referral, homelessness and:main housing dutiesLocal connection and referrallocal connection and referral, homelessness and:medical treatmentR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Avdiclocal connection and referral, homelessness and:NASS accommodation as normal residenceAl-Ameri v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC; Osmani v Harrow LBClocal connection and referral, homelessness and:reviewsSareen v Hackney LBClocal connection and referral, homelessness and:second authority, views ofR v Slough BC ex p Ealing LBClocal connection and referral, homelessness and:time for considerationMohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham LBClocal connection and referral, homelessness and:unpaid workR v Ealing LBC ex p Foxlocal connection and referral, homelessness and:violence in other areas, mandatory duty to enquire into risk ofR v Greenwich LBC ex p PattersonlodgersLewis v Weldcrest LtdAnti-social behaviourlong term, accommodation not suitable forBirmingham CC v Ali and Aweys; Moran v Manchester CClow standard accommodation, liability in negligence forMcNerny v Lambeth LBClynch mob behaviour by tenantsTower Hamlets LBC v Longmaintenance:charges, set-off ofUnchained Growth III plc v Granby Village (Manchester) Management Co Ltdmaintenance:common partsLiverpool CC v Irwinmaintenance:liftsBerryman v Hounslow LBCElectricity Supply Nominees Ltd v National Magazine Co Ltdmaintenance:safe, keeping propertyAlker v Collingwood Housing Associationmaintenance:service charges and long leasesUnchained Growth III plc v Granby Village (Manchester) Management Co LtdmaladministrationAnufrijeva v Southwark LBCmeaning of home:article 8Brogan v UKGillow v UKGloba v UkraineKhamidov v RussiaKryvitska and Kryvitskyy v UkraineBlecic v CroatiaJL v United Kingdommedical advisers, opinions ofShala v Birmingham CCSimms v Islington LBCR v Lambeth LBC ex p Waltersmedical assessmentsR (Adow) v Newham LBCR v Medina BC ex p DeeR v Lambeth LBC ex p Waltersmedical evidence :errors in assessmentsAllison v Wandsworth LBCmedical evidence :intentional homelessnessHijazi v Kensington and Chelsea RLBCmedical evidence :manage affairs, applicants capacity toHijazi v Kensington and Chelsea RLBCmedical evidence :vulnerable personsAllison v Wandsworth LBCmedical treatmentR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Avdicmental disabilities:capacityCamden LBC v MHijazi v Kensington and Chelsea RLBCR v Wirral MBC ex p BellR v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Ferdous Begummental disabilities:commencement of possession proceedingsCamden LBC v Mmental disabilities:depressionMcCarthy v KhoslaSmyth v Farnworthmental disabilities:homelessnessHijazi v Kensington and Chelsea RLBCR v Wirral MBC ex p BellR v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Ferdous BegumR v Westminster CC ex p Abdulkadirmental disabilities:intentional homelessnessHijazi v Kensington and Chelsea RLBCR v Wirral MBC ex p Bellmental disabilities:manage affairs, applicants capacity toHijazi v Kensington and Chelsea RLBCR v Wirral MBC ex p Bellmental disabilities:medical evidenceHijazi v Kensington and Chelsea RLBCmental disabilities:noticeR v Westminster CC ex p Abdulkadirmental disabilities:occupation as a residenceTickner v Hearnmesne profitsMesne profitsMinistry of Defence v AshmanMinistry of Defence v ThompsonShi v Jiangsu Native Produce Import & Export CorpSwordheath Properties Ltd v TabetViscount Chelsea v Hutchinsonmesne profits:armed forces, quarters forMinistry of Defence v AshmanMinistry of Defence v ThompsonShi v Jiangsu Native Produce Import & Export Corpmesne profits:calculationMesne profitsMinistry of Defence v AshmanMinistry of Defence v ThompsonShi v Jiangsu Native Produce Import & Export CorpSwordheath Properties Ltd v Tabetmesne profits:concessionary rates or council rates for armed forcesMinistry of Defence v Thompsonmesne profits:damagesMesne profitsSwordheath Properties Ltd v Tabetmesne profits:former head lessees, againstViscount Chelsea v Hutchinsonmesne profits:letting valueSwordheath Properties Ltd v Tabetmesne profits:open market valueMinistry of Defence v Ashmanmesne profits:rehousing, armed forces awaitingMinistry of Defence v Thompsonmesne profits:special circumstances where occupants would never have had to pay full market rentMinistry of Defence v Ashmanmesne profits:subtenanciesBraintree DC v Vincentmesne profits:trespassersMesne profitsmesne profits:vacant possession, calculation of loss suffered by deprivation ofShi v Jiangsu Native Produce Import & Export Corpmesne profits:value to trespassers, measure of damages asSwordheath Properties Ltd v Tabetmice infestationLondon & Quadrant Housing Trust v RiemymisrepresentationIslington LBC v UckacNeil v KingsnorthmitigationReichman v BeveridgeDamagesWandsworth LBC v Osei-Bonsumixed business/residential useWagle v Trustees of Henry Smith’s Charity Kensington EstateWebb v Barnet LBCPirabakaran v Patelmortgage arrears:adjournmentsHalifax plc v TaffsSkandia Financial Services Ltd v Greenfieldmortgage arrears:no prospect of paymentAbbey National Mortgages v Bernardmortgage arrears:paymentHalifax plc v TaffsAbbey National Mortgages v BernardCitibank Trust Ltd v Ayivormortgage arrears:reasonable periodNational and Provincial Building Society v LloydCitibank Trust Ltd v AyivorSkandia Financial Services Ltd v Greenfieldmortgage arrears:sale of propertyNational and Provincial Building Society v Lloydmortgage arrears:shortfall of mortgage advances, recovery ofWest Bromwich Building Society v Wilkinsonmortgage arrears:surveyors, cause of action againstCitibank Trust Ltd v Ayivormortgage arrears:suspension of ordersAbbey National Mortgages v Bernardmortgage arrears:writing, agreements inTarget Holdings Ltd v Priestleymortgage possession proceedingsAbbey National v GibsonAlbany Home Loans Ltd v Masseymortgage possession proceedings:abuse of processSecurum Finance Ltd v Ashtonmortgage possession proceedings:adjournmentsBirmingham Citizens Permanent Building Society v CauntHalifax plc v TaffsCheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v ObiFirst Middlesbrough Trading and Mortgage Co Ltd v CunninghamSkandia Financial Services Ltd v Greenfieldmortgage possession proceedings:all moneys chargeHabib Bank v Tailormortgage possession proceedings:appealsHyde Park Funding Ltd v IoannouLloyds TSB plc v Jayashankarmortgage possession proceedings:arrearsHalifax plc v TaffsAbbey National Mortgages v BernardNational and Provincial Building Society v LloydCitibank Trust Ltd v AyivorSkandia Financial Services Ltd v GreenfieldTarget Holdings Ltd v PriestleyWest Bromwich Building Society v Wilkinsonmortgage possession proceedings:bankrupts, standing ofNationwide Building Society v Purvismortgage possession proceedings:best price, attainment ofBradford and Bingley plc v RossMortgage Express v MardnerRaja v Lloyds TSBmortgage possession proceedings:circumstances of case, reasonableness as dependent onWestern Bank v Schindlermortgage possession proceedings:connected or associated companies, sale toBradford and Bingley plc v RossMortgage Express v Mardnermortgage possession proceedings:Consumer Credit Act 1974Consumer Credit Act 1974Broadwick Financial Services Ltd v SpencerFirst National Bank v SyedRahman v Sterling Credit LtdSouthern and District Finance plc v BarnesBarclays Bank plc v BrooksCedar Holdings v JenkinsCity Mortgage Corp Ltd v Baptistemortgage possession proceedings:contra proferentem ruleBank of Scotland v Ladjadjmortgage possession proceedings:counterclaimsCity Mortgage Corp Ltd v BaptisteRoyal Bank of Scotland v O’Sheamortgage possession proceedings:county courtsYorkshire Bank plc v Hallmortgage possession proceedings:discretionSouthern and District Finance plc v Barnesmortgage possession proceedings:documents:constructionBank of Scotland v Ladjadjmortgage possession proceedings:documents:evidence of how sums calculatedHalifax plc v Alexandermortgage possession proceedings:dwelling houses, time for consideration of whether premises includesRoyal Bank of Scotland v Millermortgage possession proceedings:endowment mortgagesBank of Scotland v Grimesmortgage possession proceedings:enforcement of possession ordersAbbey National v Gibsonmortgage possession proceedings:evidenceHalifax plc v AlexanderCheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Grantmortgage possession proceedings:execution of warrantsCheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v ObiMortgage Agency Services v BalHyde Park Funding Ltd v IoannouLloyds TSB plc v Jayashankarmortgage possession proceedings:extended by offers of settlement, time limitsBradford and Bingley plc v Rashidmortgage possession proceedings:extortionate credit bargainsBroadwick Financial Services Ltd v SpencerParagon Finance Ltd v Nash; Paragon Finance plc v StauntonCity Mortgage Corp Ltd v Baptistemortgage possession proceedings:fairnessLloyds Bank plc v Dixmortgage possession proceedings:financial factors, taking into account ofPolonski v Lloyds Bank Mortgages Ltdmortgage possession proceedings:fraudR v Barnet LBC ex p Rughooputhmortgage possession proceedings:High CourtCheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Krauszmortgage possession proceedings:hopelessness of caseLloyds Bank plc v Dixmortgage possession proceedings:implied termsRahman v Sterling Credit Ltdmortgage possession proceedings:instalments:agreements to pay byEmery v UCB Bank plcRoyal Bank of Scotland v Elmesmortgage possession proceedings:instalments:power to orderFirst National Bank v Syedmortgage possession proceedings:instalments:promissory estoppelEmery v UCB Bank plcmortgage possession proceedings:instalments:suspension of warrantsRoyal Bank of Scotland v Elmesmortgage possession proceedings:insurance policiesWoolwich Building Society v Brownmortgage possession proceedings:intentional homelessnessWilliam v Wandsworth LBC; Bellamy v Hounslow LBCR v Barnet LBC ex p RughooputhWatchman v Ipswich BCR v Shrewsbury and Atcham BC ex p Griffithsmortgage possession proceedings:interest:ratesRahman v Sterling Credit LtdConsumer Credit Act 1974Paragon Finance Ltd v Nash; Paragon Finance plc v StauntonCedar Holdings v Jenkinsmortgage possession proceedings:interest:time limitsBristol and West plc v BartlettScottish Equitable v Thompsonmortgage possession proceedings:joint borrowersAlbany Home Loans Ltd v Masseymortgage possession proceedings:merits of caseLloyds Bank plc v Dixmortgage possession proceedings:money judgmentsCheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v GrattidgeCheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Johnsonmortgage possession proceedings:mortgagors, tenants ofTenants of mortgagorsBerkshire Capital Funding Ltd v StreetBritannia Building Society v EarlLloyds Bank plc v Doyle and OthersMann v NijarSadiq v HussainWalthamstow Building Society v DaviesWoolwich Building Society v DickmanAbbey National plc v YusufNational Westminster Home Loans v Richesmortgage possession proceedings:peaceful enjoyment of possessionsBarclays Bank v Alcornmortgage possession proceedings:possession ordersUCB Bank plc v ChandlerAbbey National v GibsonAlbany Home Loans Ltd v Masseymortgage possession proceedings:private and family life, right to respect forBarclays Bank v Alcornmortgage possession proceedings:promissory estoppelEmery v UCB Bank plcmortgage possession proceedings:reasonableness:adjournmentsFirst Middlesbrough Trading and Mortgage Co Ltd v CunninghamSkandia Financial Services Ltd v Greenfieldmortgage possession proceedings:reasonableness:arrears, payment ofNational and Provincial Building Society v LloydCitibank Trust Ltd v AyivorSkandia Financial Services Ltd v Greenfield12mortgage possession proceedings:reasonableness:circumstances of caseWestern Bank v Schindlermortgage possession proceedings:reasonableness:sale, time forBristol and West Building Society v EllisNational and Provincial Building Society v Lloydmortgage possession proceedings:reasonableness:suspended possession ordersCheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Norganmortgage possession proceedings:regulated agreementsConsumer Credit Act 1974mortgage possession proceedings:remortgage to pay instalments, failure to use money fromWilliam v Wandsworth LBC; Bellamy v Hounslow LBCmortgage possession proceedings:right to possessionCredit & Mercantile plc v Marksmortgage possession proceedings:sale:best price, attainment ofBradford and Bingley plc v RossMortgage Express v MardnerRaja v Lloyds TSBmortgage possession proceedings:sale:connected or associated companies, sale toBradford and Bingley plc v RossMortgage Express v Mardnermortgage possession proceedings:sale:early sales, prospects ofTarget Home Loans v Clothiermortgage possession proceedings:sale:financial factors, taking into accountPolonski v Lloyds Bank Mortgages Ltdmortgage possession proceedings:sale:High CourtCheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Krauszmortgage possession proceedings:sale:jurisdictionPalk v Mortgage Services Fundingmortgage possession proceedings:sale:orders for saleBradford and Bingley plc v RossMortgage Express v MardnerPalk v Mortgage Services Fundingmortgage possession proceedings:sale:reasonable periodBristol and West Building Society v EllisNational and Provincial Building Society v Lloydmortgage possession proceedings:sale:rent arrears, payment ofNational and Provincial Building Society v Lloydmortgage possession proceedings:sale:shortfall, leave where sale would leave a mortgageBarrett v Halifax Building Societymortgage possession proceedings:sale:social factors, taking into accountPolonski v Lloyds Bank Mortgages Ltdmortgage possession proceedings:sale:suspended possession ordersCheltenham and Gloucester plc v BookerMortgage Service Funding plc v SteeleTarget Home Loans v ClothierCheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Krauszmortgage possession proceedings:sale:who should sell propertyMortgage Service Funding plc v Steelemortgage possession proceedings:set-offsRoyal Bank of Scotland v O’Sheamortgage possession proceedings:settlementsBradford and Bingley plc v Rashidmortgage possession proceedings:shortfall of mortgagesBarrett v Halifax Building SocietyWest Bromwich Building Society v Wilkinsonmortgage possession proceedings:social factors, taking into accountPolonski v Lloyds Bank Mortgages Ltdmortgage possession proceedings:specification of amounts outstandingAbbey National v Gibsonmortgage possession proceedings:standingNationwide Building Society v Purvismortgage possession proceedings:stay of executionMortgage Express v Da Rocha-Afodumortgage possession proceedings:striking outBarclays Bank plc v Brooksmortgage possession proceedings:subchargesCredit & Mercantile plc v Marksmortgage possession proceedings:subletting, prohibition in deed againstCitibank International plc v Kesslermortgage possession proceedings:surveyors, cause of action againstCitibank Trust Ltd v Ayivormortgage possession proceedings:suspended possession ordersCheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v FrascaHyde Park Funding Ltd v IoannouLloyds TSB plc v JayashankarRoyal Bank of Scotland v Elmesmortgage possession proceedings:suspended possession orders:appeals after execution of warrantsHyde Park Funding Ltd v IoannouLloyds TSB plc v Jayashankarmortgage possession proceedings:suspended possession orders:arrears, where no prospect of reducingAbbey National Mortgages v Bernardmortgage possession proceedings:suspended possession orders:early sale, prospect ofTarget Home Loans v Clothiermortgage possession proceedings:suspended possession orders:execution of warrantsMortgage Agency Services v BalHyde Park Funding Ltd v IoannouLloyds TSB plc v Jayashankarmortgage possession proceedings:suspended possession orders:fixing period of timeRoyal Trust Co of Canada v Markhammortgage possession proceedings:suspended possession orders:general termsRoyal Trust Co of Canada v Markhammortgage possession proceedings:suspended possession orders:inherent jurisdictionCheltenham and Gloucester plc v Bookermortgage possession proceedings:suspended possession orders:instalments, agreements to pay byRoyal Bank of Scotland v Elmesmortgage possession proceedings:suspended possession orders:money judgmentsCheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v GrattidgeCheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Johnsonmortgage possession proceedings:suspended possession orders:no further applications, orders forAbbey National Building Society v Mewtonmortgage possession proceedings:suspended possession orders:reasonable periodCheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Norganmortgage possession proceedings:suspended possession orders:refusal to suspendCheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v FrascaHyde Park Funding Ltd v Ioannoumortgage possession proceedings:suspended possession orders:sale of propertyCheltenham and Gloucester plc v BookerTarget Home Loans v ClothierCheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Krauszmortgage possession proceedings:suspended possession orders:terms of mortgageCentrax Trustees v Rossmortgage possession proceedings:terms of mortgageCentrax Trustees v Rossmortgage possession proceedings:time limitsSecurum Finance Ltd v AshtonRahman v Sterling Credit LtdBradford and Bingley plc v RashidBristol and West plc v BartlettScottish Equitable v ThompsonWest Bromwich Building Society v Wilkinsonmortgage possession proceedings:time ordersConsumer Credit Act 1974Southern and District Finance plc v BarnesCedar Holdings v Jenkinsmortgage possession proceedings:warrantsRoyal Bank of Scotland v ElmesAbbey National v GibsonBradford and Bingley plc v RashidCheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Krauszmortgages:business mortgage defaultR v Wandsworth LBC ex p Onwudiwemortgages:failure to pay instalmentsWilliam v Wandsworth LBC; Bellamy v Hounslow LBCmortgages:forfeitureEscalus Properties Ltd v Robinsonmortgages:fraudR v Barnet LBC ex p Rughooputhmortgages:intentional homelessnessWilliam v Wandsworth LBC; Bellamy v Hounslow LBCR v Barnet LBC ex p RughooputhR v Wandsworth LBC ex p Onwudiwemortgages:private and family life and home, right to respect forWood v UKmortgagors, tenants of:charges, second mortgages executed to replace earlier defectiveWalthamstow Building Society v Daviesmortgagors, tenants of:consentTenants of mortgagorsLloyds Bank plc v Doyle and OthersSadiq v HussainWoolwich Building Society v Dickmanmortgagors, tenants of:illegality, tenancies void unless waiver ofSadiq v Hussainmortgagors, tenants of:mortgage possession proceedingsTenants of mortgagorsBerkshire Capital Funding Ltd v StreetBritannia Building Society v EarlLloyds Bank plc v Doyle and OthersMann v NijarSadiq v HussainWalthamstow Building Society v DaviesWoolwich Building Society v DickmanAbbey National plc v YusufNational Westminster Home Loans v Richesmortgagors, tenants of:mortgagor, tenants as within definition ofAbbey National plc v Yusufmortgagors, tenants of:prior mortgagees, second mortgagees could not destroy tenancy granted byBerkshire Capital Funding Ltd v Streetmortgagors, tenants of:prior tenanciesBerkshire Capital Funding Ltd v StreetLloyds Bank plc v Doyle and OthersWalthamstow Building Society v DaviesWoolwich Building Society v Dickmanmortgagors, tenants of:receivers, confirmation of tenancies by collection of rent byMann v Nijarmortgagors, tenants of:redeem of mortgage, suspension of orders to allow tenants toNational Westminster Home Loans v Richesmortgagors, tenants of:second mortgagesBerkshire Capital Funding Ltd v StreetWalthamstow Building Society v Daviesmortgagors, tenants of:signed rights away, where tenants haveWoolwich Building Society v Dickmanmortgagors, tenants of:subsequent tenanciesBritannia Building Society v EarlLloyds Bank plc v Doyle and Othersmortgagors, tenants of:suspension of possession ordersAbbey National plc v YusufNational Westminster Home Loans v Richesmortgagors, tenants of:types of property used for letting, where premisesLloyds Bank plc v Doyle and Othersmortgagors, tenants of:waiver of illegalitySadiq v Hussainmoss on stepsBrunskill v Mulcahymultiple needs, assessment ofGeneralmutual co-operative tenanciesAli Bhai and Cabare v Black Roof CHA LtdNational Assistance Act 1948IntroductionNational Assistance Act 1948:destitutionIntroductionNational Assistance Act 1948:homelessnessIntroductionNationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002IntroductionNationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002:safety netIntroductionnegative covenantsSavva v Housseinnegligence:banistersWalker v Nottingham CCnegligence:builders and designers, liability of landlords asRimmer v Liverpool CCTargett v Torfaen BCnegligence:building subcontractorsD & F Estates Ltd v Church Commissionersnegligence:cockroach infestationSharpe v Manchester MDCnegligence:contributory negligenceDamagesnegligence:disrepair:banistersWalker v Nottingham CCnegligence:disrepair:builders and designers, liability of landlords asRimmer v Liverpool CCTargett v Torfaen BCnegligence:disrepair:building subcontractorsD & F Estates Ltd v Church Commissionersnegligence:disrepair:cockroach infestationSharpe v Manchester MDCnegligence:disrepair:duty of careStockley v Knowsley MBCHawkins v Dhawannegligence:disrepair:low standard accommodationMcNerny v Lambeth LBCnegligence:disrepair:pathsLips v Oldernegligence:disrepair:pipe overflowsHawkins v Dhawannegligence:duty of careStockley v Knowsley MBCHawkins v Dhawannegligence:low standard accommodation, liability in negligence forMcNerny v Lambeth LBCnegligence:pathsLips v Oldernegligence:pipe overflowsHawkins v Dhawanneighbourhood, suitability ofDawncar Investments Ltd v Plewsneighbours:sensitive tenants next to each other, placingBrent LBC v Doughanneighbours:terrorised, where neighbours areWear Valley DC v Robsonneighbours :adjoining occupiers as being neighbouring occupiersCobstone Investments Ltd v Maximneighbours :definitionNorthampton BC v Lovattneighbours :driven out by neighbours, tenants who have beenStephens v Kerrneighbours :failure of landlord to take action against neighboursLandlord’s failure to take action against other occupantsMitchell v Glasgow CCHussain v Lancaster CCneighbours :injunctionsManchester CC v Leeneighbours :murder by neighboursMitchell v Glasgow CCneighbours :nuisance or annoyanceCobstone Investments Ltd v MaximKnowsley Housing Trust v McMullenManchester CC v LeeWear Valley DC v Robsonneighbours :occupation as a residenceStephens v Kerrneighbours :particular neighbours, nuisance againstManchester CC v Leeneighbours :past obsessions with neighboursKnowsley Housing Trust v McMullenneighbours :reasonableness of possession ordersKnowsley Housing Trust v McMullenneighbours :separate dwelling, let as aKavanagh v Lyroudiasnoise:acoustic evidenceLewisham LBC v Hallnoise:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings underLewisham LBC v HallR (Vella) v Lambeth LBC and London and Quadrant Housing Trustnoise:sound insulationSouthwark LBC v Mills; Southwark LBC v Tanner; Baxter v Camden LBCR (Vella) v Lambeth LBC and London and Quadrant Housing Trustnominal damagesDavies v Petersonnotice requiring possessionNotice requiring possession (Housing Act 1988 s21)Aylward v FawazBarker v HandsChurch Commissioners for England v MeyaElias v SpencerFernandez v McDonaldGracechurch International v Tribhovan and AbdulLower Street Properties v JonesNotting Hill Housing Trust v RoomusSingh v Emmanuelnotice requiring possession:‘after the end of your tenancy’, meaning ofNotting Hill Housing Trust v Roomusnotice requiring possession:appeals:permission refusedBarker v Handsnotice requiring possession:appeals:signature, lack ofBarker v Handsnotice requiring possession:assured shorthold tenanciesIntroductionNotice requiring possession (Housing Act 1988 s21)Aylward v FawazBarker v HandsChurch Commissioners for England v MeyaElias v SpencerFernandez v McDonaldGracechurch International v Tribhovan and AbdulLower Street Properties v JonesNotting Hill Housing Trust v RoomusSingh v Emmanuelnotice requiring possession:‘at the end of your tenancy’, meaning ofNotting Hill Housing Trust v Roomusnotice requiring possession:break clausesAylward v Fawaznotice requiring possession:date of possession, specification ofLower Street Properties v Jonesnotice requiring possession:dispense with notice, no power toNotice requiring possession (Housing Act 1988 s21)notice requiring possession:exceptional hardshipNotice requiring possession (Housing Act 1988 s21)notice requiring possession:expiry of noticeGracechurch International v Tribhovan and AbdulLower Street Properties v Jonesnotice requiring possession:joint landlords, given by one of severalNotice requiring possession (Housing Act 1988 s21)notice requiring possession:rent was last payable, quarterly or annual tenancies determined by period for whenChurch Commissioners for England v Meyanotice requiring possession:signaturesBarker v Handsnotice requiring possession:strict application of time limitsFernandez v McDonaldnotice requiring possession:suspensionNotice requiring possession (Housing Act 1988 s21)notice requiring possession:time limitsIntroductionNotice requiring possession (Housing Act 1988 s21)Elias v SpencerFernandez v McDonaldGracechurch International v Tribhovan and AbdulSingh v Emmanuelnotice requiring possession:validityElias v SpencerGracechurch International v Tribhovan and AbdulSingh v Emmanuelnotice requiring possession:writingNotice requiring possession (Housing Act 1988 s21)notice seeking possessionIntroductionnotice seeking possession:agricultural employeesFowler v MinchinSpringfield Investments Ltd v Bellnotice seeking possession:amendmentsCamden LBC v OppongMarath v MacGillivraynotice seeking possession:claritySlough BC v Robbinsnotice seeking possession:defective groundsMountain v Hastingsnotice seeking possession:Director of Housing, not signed byCity of London Corporation v Devlinnotice seeking possession:discretionKelsey Housing Association v KingKnowsley Housing Trust v Revell; Helena Housing Ltd v CurtisMcShane v William Sutton Trustnotice seeking possession:dispensing with noticeNotices seeking possession (Housing Act 1985)Braintree DC v VincentNotice of proceedings for possession (Housing Act 1988)Kelsey Housing Association v KingKnowsley Housing Trust v Revell; Helena Housing Ltd v CurtisNorth British Housing Association v SheridanMcShane v William Sutton Trustnotice seeking possession:errors in particulars of groundsDudley MBC v Baileynotice seeking possession:exceptional circumstances, dispensing with NSP inBraintree DC v VincentCamden LBC v Oppongnotice seeking possession:failure to comply with notice provisions, striking out forKelsey Housing Association v Kingnotice seeking possession:groundsNotices seeking possession (Housing Act 1985)Camden LBC v OppongNotice of proceedings for possession (Housing Act 1988)Marath v MacGillivrayMountain v Hastingsnotice seeking possession:Housing Act 1985Introductionnotice seeking possession:Housing Act 1988IntroductionNotice of proceedings for possession (Housing Act 1988)Kelsey Housing Association v KingKnowsley Housing Trust v Revell; Helena Housing Ltd v CurtisMarath v MacGillivrayMountain v HastingsNorth British Housing Association v SheridanMcShane v William Sutton TrustFowler v MinchinSpringfield Investments Ltd v Bellnotice seeking possession:just and equitable to dispense with requirementNotices seeking possession (Housing Act 1985)Notice of proceedings for possession (Housing Act 1988)North British Housing Association v Sheridannotice seeking possession:leave, amendments withMarath v MacGillivraynotice seeking possession:major refurbishment schemesWaltham Forest LBC v Englandnotice seeking possession:mandatory grounds for rent arrearsMarath v MacGillivraynotice seeking possession:mesne profitsBraintree DC v Vincentnotice seeking possession:particulars of groundsNotices seeking possession (Housing Act 1985)Camden LBC v OppongDudley MBC v BaileyTorridge DC v JonesSlough BC v RobbinsWaltham Forest LBC v EnglandMarath v MacGillivraynotice seeking possession:personal circumstances, consideration ofKnowsley Housing Trust v Revell; Helena Housing Ltd v Curtisnotice seeking possession:possessionMountain v HastingsNorth British Housing Association v Sheridannotice seeking possession:prescribed form, substantially to the same effect asDudley MBC v BaileyNotice of proceedings for possession (Housing Act 1988)notice seeking possession:procedural rulings, technical defects defeated byCity of London Corporation v Devlinnotice seeking possession:relatively exceptional circumstances, dispensing with NSP inBraintree DC v Vincentnotice seeking possession:rent arrearsTorridge DC v JonesMarath v MacGillivraynotice seeking possession:striking outKelsey Housing Association v Kingnotice seeking possession:subtenanciesBraintree DC v Vincentnotice seeking possession:technical defectsCity of London Corporation v Devlinnotice to quit:agreementsBarrett v Morgannotice to quit:agricultural holdings as not being a dwellingNational Trust for Places of Historic Interest v Knipenotice to quit:ascertained by tenant, where date could beAddis v Burrowsnotice to quit:assured tenanciesSubletting the whole of premisesnotice to quit:attention, notice not coming to tenant’sBlunden v Frogmore Investments Ltdnotice to quit:commencement of possession proceedingsAlamo Housing Co-operative Ltd v Meredithnotice to quit:common lawIntroductionEnfield LBC v Devonish and SuttonHarler v Caldernotice to quit:contractHarler v Caldernotice to quit:date:ascertained by tenant, where date could beAddis v Burrowsnotice to quit:date:expiry of noticeHammersmith and Fulham LBC v ClarkeCrate v Millernotice to quit:deceased tenants:served, necessary for notice to beWirral MBC v Smithnotice to quit:domestic violence, requirement to serve notice when fleeingR (Hammia) v Wandsworth LBCnotice to quit:employees, licences forNorris v Checksfieldnotice to quit:expiry of noticeCrate v Millernotice to quit:landlords, served byAddis v Burrowsnotice to quit:Law of Property Act 1925, service andEnfield LBC v Devonish and SuttonWandsworth LBC v Attwellnotice to quit:licencesNorris v Checksfieldnotice to quit:mistake, test for obviousCarradine Properties Ltd v Aslamnotice to quit:monthly tenancies, period of notice forPrecious v Reedienotice to quit:obvious mistakes, test forCarradine Properties Ltd v Aslamnotice to quit:occupation, rights ofFletcher v Brent LBCnotice to quit:old prescribed forms, use ofBeckerman v DurlingSwansea CC v Hearnnotice to quit:only or principal home, date for determining whetherHammersmith and Fulham LBC v Clarkenotice to quit:postal serviceBlunden v Frogmore Investments Ltdnotice to quit:property, express provision required for service atWandsworth LBC v Attwellnotice to quit:Protection from Eviction Act 1977Protection from Eviction Act 1977 (civil provisions)notice to quit:security of tenureIntroductionnotice to quit:service:attention, not coming to tenant’sBlunden v Frogmore Investments Ltdnotice to quit:service:commencement of possession proceedingsAlamo Housing Co-operative Ltd v Meredithnotice to quit:service:common law, service to satisfyEnfield LBC v Devonish and Suttonnotice to quit:service:Law of Property Act 1925Enfield LBC v Devonish and SuttonWandsworth LBC v Attwellnotice to quit:service:post, byBlunden v Frogmore Investments Ltdnotice to quit:service:property, express provision required for service atWandsworth LBC v Attwellnotice to quit:subtenanciesHammersmith and Fulham LBC v Clarkenotice to quit:sufficient interestAlamo Housing Co-operative Ltd v Meredithnotice to quit:surrenderBarrett v Morgannotice to quit:time limitsManorlike Ltd v Le Vitas Travel AgencySchnabel v AllardPrecious v ReedieProtection from Eviction Act 1977 (civil provisions)notice to quit:validityAddis v BurrowsBeckerman v DurlingManorlike Ltd v Le Vitas Travel AgencyCarradine Properties Ltd v Aslamnotice to quit served by tenants:4 weeks notice, waiver ofHounslow LBC v Pillingnotice to quit served by tenantsHammersmith and Fulham LBC v MonkHarrow LBC v JohnstoneNewlon Housing Trust v Al-SulaimenBater v Bater; Bater v Greenwich LBCBradford Community Housing Ltd v HussainCrawley BC v UreGreenwich LBC v McGradyHounslow LBC v PillingNotting Hill Housing Trust v Brackleynotice to quit served by tenants:ambiguityBradford Community Housing Ltd v Hussainnotice to quit served by tenants:breach of trustGreenwich LBC v McGradynotice to quit served by tenants:Children Act 1989Bater v Bater; Bater v Greenwich LBCnotice to quit served by tenants:common law, contract not oustingHarler v Caldernotice to quit served by tenants:contractIntroductionHarler v Caldernotice to quit served by tenants:date:one day out, as beingMannai Investment Co Ltd v Eagle Star Life Assurance Co Ltdnotice to quit served by tenants:date:reasonable recipient testMannai Investment Co Ltd v Eagle Star Life Assurance Co Ltdnotice to quit served by tenants:date:savings clauseFletcher v Brent LBCnotice to quit served by tenants:date:wrong dateFletcher v Brent LBCnotice to quit served by tenants:enforcementCrawley BC v Urenotice to quit served by tenants:excluding other tenants, ordersHarrow LBC v Johnstonenotice to quit served by tenants:injunctions:Children Act 1989Bater v Bater; Bater v Greenwich LBCnotice to quit served by tenants:injunctions:joint tenantsBater v Bater; Bater v Greenwich LBCnotice to quit served by tenants:injunctions:Matrimonial Causes Act1973Bater v Bater; Bater v Greenwich LBCnotice to quit served by tenants:joint tenantsHammersmith and Fulham LBC v MonkHarrow LBC v JohnstoneGreenwich LBC v McGradyNotting Hill Housing Trust v Brackleynotice to quit served by tenants:joint tenants:breach of trustGreenwich LBC v McGradynotice to quit served by tenants:joint tenants:excluding other tenants, ordersHarrow LBC v Johnstonenotice to quit served by tenants:joint tenants:injunctionsBater v Bater; Bater v Greenwich LBCnotice to quit served by tenants:joint tenants:termination of tenanciesHammersmith and Fulham LBC v MonkHarrow LBC v Johnstonenotice to quit served by tenants:joint tenants:trusts for sale, breach ofGreenwich LBC v McGradynotice to quit served by tenants:joint tenants:waiver clausesNotting Hill Housing Trust v Brackleynotice to quit served by tenants:jurisdictionBater v Bater; Bater v Greenwich LBCnotice to quit served by tenants:matrimonial assetsNewlon Housing Trust v Al-Sulaimennotice to quit served by tenants:Matrimonial Causes Act1973Bater v Bater; Bater v Greenwich LBCnotice to quit served by tenants:one day out, where date isMannai Investment Co Ltd v Eagle Star Life Assurance Co Ltdnotice to quit served by tenants:possession claims/ordersCrawley BC v Urenotice to quit served by tenants:private and family life and home, right to respect forCrawley BC v Urenotice to quit served by tenants:Protection from Eviction Act 1977Introductionnotice to quit served by tenants:reasonable recipient testMannai Investment Co Ltd v Eagle Star Life Assurance Co LtdGarston v Scottish Widowsnotice to quit served by tenants:restraining other tenantsNewlon Housing Trust v Al-SulaimenBater v Bater; Bater v Greenwich LBCnotice to quit served by tenants:right to buy, extinguishment ofBater v Bater; Bater v Greenwich LBCnotice to quit served by tenants:sale, breach of trusts forGreenwich LBC v McGradynotice to quit served by tenants:savings clauseFletcher v Brent LBCnotice to quit served by tenants:set aside NTQ, jurisdiction toBater v Bater; Bater v Greenwich LBCnotice to quit served by tenants:subtenancies, termination ofPennell v Paynenotice to quit served by tenants:termination of tenanciesHammersmith and Fulham LBC v MonkHarrow LBC v JohnstoneNewlon Housing Trust v Al-Sulaimennotice to quit served by tenants:trusts, breach ofGreenwich LBC v McGradynotice to quit served by tenants:validityMannai Investment Co Ltd v Eagle Star Life Assurance Co LtdGarston v Scottish WidowsFletcher v Brent LBCnotice to quit served by tenants:waiverHounslow LBC v PillingNotting Hill Housing Trust v Brackleynotice to quit served by tenants:wrong dateMannai Investment Co Ltd v Eagle Star Life Assurance Co LtdFletcher v Brent LBCnuisance or annoyanceSagvolden v NorwayArticle 8: NuisanceBăcilă v RomaniaBor v HungaryDubetska v UkraineFadeyeva v RussiaGomez v SpainGrimkovskaya v UkraineHardy and Maile v UKHatton and others v UKLópez Ostra v SpainMaempel v MaltaOluić v CroatiaAnti-social behaviournuisance or annoyance:abatement noticesBudd v Colchester BCR v Bristol CC ex p EverettSFI Group plc v Gosport BCCanterbury CC v FerrisR (Anne) v Test Valley BCnuisance or annoyance:abatement ordersAshard v Islington LBCnuisance or annoyance:abusive and menacing language, no orders whereWoking BC v Bistramnuisance or annoyance:access not given to abate nuisanceJones v Walsall MBCnuisance or annoyance:acquiescence, intentional homelessness andGriffiths v St Helens MBCR v Swansea CC ex p Johnnuisance or annoyance:adjoining occupiersCobstone Investments Ltd v Maximnuisance or annoyance:alternative accommodation, not permissible for court to require provision ofDarlington BC v Sterlingnuisance or annoyance:anti-social behaviour ordersAnti-social behaviourLondon and Quadrant Housing Trust v RootManchester CC v HigginsMoat Housing Group South Ltd v Harris and Hartlessnuisance or annoyance:any persons residing with tenantsAnti-social behaviournuisance or annoyance:appealsCDS Housing v BellisMatthews v AhmedKnowsley Housing Trust v Prescottnuisance or annoyance:arrestable offencesAnti-social behaviournuisance or annoyance:assured tenanciesAnti-social behaviourRaglan Housing Association Ltd v FaircloughKensington Housing Trust v Borkwoodnuisance or annoyance:barking dogsBudd v Colchester BCnuisance or annoyance:before tenancy, offences committed beforeRaglan Housing Association Ltd v Faircloughnuisance or annoyance:breach of obligations as ground for possessionCamden LBC v McBrideKensington and Chelsea RLBC v SimmondsNorthampton BC v Lovattnuisance or annoyance:building worksGuppys (Bridport) Ltd v Brooklingnuisance or annoyance:cannabis, possession ofAbrahams v Wilsonnuisance or annoyance:care leavers convicted of criminal offencesGreenwich LBC v Grogannuisance or annoyance:cats, large number ofHarlow DC v Sewellnuisance or annoyance:children:acquiescence, intentional homelessness andGriffiths v St Helens MBCnuisance or annoyance:children:imprisonment of childNew Charter Housing (North) Ltd v Ashcroftnuisance or annoyance:children:indifference to effect of behaviour of childrenManchester CC v Higginsnuisance or annoyance:children:intentional homelessnessGriffiths v St Helens MBCnuisance or annoyance:children:racial harassment by childrenWest Kent Housing Association v Daviesnuisance or annoyance:children:reign of terror by children, outright orders whereNewcastle upon Tyne CC v Morrisonnuisance or annoyance:children:remorse, outright orders where tenant shows noManchester CC v Higginsnuisance or annoyance:children:suspended possession ordersKnowsley Housing Trust v McMullennuisance or annoyance:closes mind to misconduct, where tenantsPortsmouth CC v Bryantnuisance or annoyance:cockroach infestationHabinteg Housing Association v JamesSharpe v Manchester MDCnuisance or annoyance:contempt, sentencing forSandwell MBC v Preecenuisance or annoyance:continuation, likelihood ofAccent Peerless Ltd (formerly Surrey Heath Housing Association Ltd) v Kingsdonnuisance or annoyance:costsR v Dudley Magistrates’ Court ex p Hollisnuisance or annoyance:criminal offencesRaglan Housing Association Ltd v FaircloughAbrahams v WilsonGreenwich LBC v GroganNorth Devon Homes Ltd v BatchelorWandsworth LBC v Webbnuisance or annoyance:currency of tenancy, not restricted toRaglan Housing Association Ltd v Faircloughnuisance or annoyance:definitionCivil proceedingsnuisance or annoyance:discretionAnti-social behaviournuisance or annoyance:disrepair:cockroach infestationHabinteg Housing Association v JamesSharpe v Manchester MDCnuisance or annoyance:disrepair:damagesVergara v Lambeth LBC and Hyde Southbank Homesnuisance or annoyance:disrepair:exclusive possessionHunter v Canary Wharf Ltdnuisance or annoyance:disrepair:floodingLambert v Barratt Homes Ltd and Rochdale MBCnuisance or annoyance:disrepair:normal use of flatsSouthwark LBC v Mills; Southwark LBC v Tanner; Baxter v Camden LBCnuisance or annoyance:disrepair:television receptionHunter v Canary Wharf Ltdnuisance or annoyance:dogs, keepingSheffield CC v GreenSheffield CC v Jepsonnuisance or annoyance:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under:abatement noticesBudd v Colchester BCnuisance or annoyance:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under:access not given to abate nuisanceJones v Walsall MBCnuisance or annoyance:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under:barking dogsBudd v Colchester BCnuisance or annoyance:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under:costsR v Dudley Magistrates’ Court ex p Hollisnuisance or annoyance:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under:noise, acoustic evidence onLewisham LBC v Hallnuisance or annoyance:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under:statutory nuisanceCriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 and other ActsCunningham v Birmingham CCFarrar v Dover CCGreater London Council v Tower Hamlets LBCnuisance or annoyance:evidence:fresh evidenceLeeds and Yorkshire Housing Association v Vertigannuisance or annoyance:evidence:hearsayAnti-social behaviour (Housing Acts 1985 and 1988)Moat Housing Group South Ltd v Harris and Hartlessnuisance or annoyance:evidence:psychiatric evidenceCroydon LBC v Moodynuisance or annoyance:evidence:undertakings as fresh evidenceLeeds and Yorkshire Housing Association v Vertigannuisance or annoyance:exceptional circumstancesBristol CC v MousahKnowsley Housing Trust v McMullennuisance or annoyance:exclusive possessionHunter v Canary Wharf Ltdnuisance or annoyance:failure to prevent misconductPortsmouth CC v Bryantnuisance or annoyance:floodingLambert v Barratt Homes Ltd and Rochdale MBCnuisance or annoyance:forfeitureCourtney Lodge Management Ltd v Blakenuisance or annoyance:fresh evidenceLeeds and Yorkshire Housing Association v Vertigannuisance or annoyance:grounds for possessionAnti-social behaviourBreach of obligation and anti-social behaviourAccent Peerless Ltd (formerly Surrey Heath Housing Association Ltd) v KingsdonBarking and Dagenham LBC v Hyatt and HyattBedfordshire Pilgrims Housing Association Ltd v KhanBrent LBC v DoughanBristol CC v MousahCDS Housing v BellisCamden LBC v GilsenanCanterbury CC v LoweCastle Vale Housing Action Trust v GallagherCroydon LBC v MoodyDarlington BC v SterlingGreenwich LBC v GroganKnowsley Housing Trust v McMullenLambeth LBC v HowardLeeds and Yorkshire Housing Association v VertiganLondon and Quadrant Housing Trust v RootManchester CC v HigginsMatthews v AhmedNew Charter Housing (North) Ltd v AshcroftNewcastle upon Tyne CC v MorrisonNorth Devon Homes Ltd v BatchelorNorwich CC v FamuyiwaSheffield CC v GreenSheffield CC v JepsonSheffield CC v ShawSolon South West Housing Association Ltd v JamesWandsworth LBC v HargreavesWandsworth LBC v WebbWest Kent Housing Association v DaviesWoking BC v BistramKnowsley Housing Trust v PrescottSheffield CC v Fletchernuisance or annoyance:harassmentKensington Housing Trust v BorkwoodKnowsley Housing Trust v McMullenSheffield CC v Shawnuisance or annoyance:hearsay evidenceAnti-social behaviour (Housing Acts 1985 and 1988)Solon South West Housing Association Ltd v JamesMoat Housing Group South Ltd v Harris and Hartlessnuisance or annoyance:heatingGreater London Council v Tower Hamlets LBCnuisance or annoyance:High Court, jurisdiction ofSheffield CC v Fletchernuisance or annoyance:homelessnessR v Bristol CC ex p BradicGriffiths v St Helens MBCR v Swansea CC ex p JohnR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p PR v Newham LBC ex p Campbellnuisance or annoyance:immediate orders where there is there is a lesser alternative, noCDS Housing v Bellisnuisance or annoyance:immoral or illegal purposes, use of dwelling forAnti-social behaviourAbrahams v Wilsonnuisance or annoyance:imprisonmentNew Charter Housing (North) Ltd v Ashcroftnuisance or annoyance:improvements in behaviour, admissibility despiteSolon South West Housing Association Ltd v Jamesnuisance or annoyance:indifference to effect of behaviour of childrenManchester CC v Higginsnuisance or annoyance:inevitability of outright ordersSheffield CC v Fletchernuisance or annoyance:infer nuisance, judges canFrederick Platts Co Ltd v Grigornuisance or annoyance:injunctionsCanterbury CC v LoweInjunctions against tenants and third partiesManchester CC v LeeMoat Housing Group South Ltd v Harris and HartlessNottingham CC v Zain (a minor)Sandwell MBC v PreeceStafford BC v Haynesnuisance or annoyance:intention or motiveKensington Housing Trust v BorkwoodSheffield CC v Greennuisance or annoyance:intentional homelessnessGriffiths v St Helens MBCR v Swansea CC ex p JohnMohamed v Westminster CCnuisance or annoyance:interpretationHarlow DC v SewellKensington Housing Trust v Borkwoodnuisance or annoyance:judges, reasonableness as matter for trialBedfordshire Pilgrims Housing Association Ltd v Khannuisance or annoyance:leave, not asking spouses toR v Swansea CC ex p Johnnuisance or annoyance:lesser alternatives to possession, absence ofCDS Housing v Bellisnuisance or annoyance:lodgersAnti-social behaviournuisance or annoyance:major building worksGuppys (Bridport) Ltd v Brooklingnuisance or annoyance:motive or intention to harassKensington Housing Trust v Borkwoodnuisance or annoyance:move out, disproportionate to make orders where perpetrators toCastle Vale Housing Action Trust v Gallaghernuisance or annoyance:neighbours:adjoining occupiers as being neighbouring occupiersCobstone Investments Ltd v Maximnuisance or annoyance:neighbours:injunctionsManchester CC v Leenuisance or annoyance:neighbours:past obsessions with neighboursKnowsley Housing Trust v McMullennuisance or annoyance:neighbours:reasonableness of possession ordersKnowsley Housing Trust v McMullennuisance or annoyance:noiseLewisham LBC v Hallnuisance or annoyance:normal use of flatsSouthwark LBC v Mills; Southwark LBC v Tanner; Baxter v Camden LBCnuisance or annoyance:notice, orders for application onKnowsley Housing Trust v McMullennuisance or annoyance:one-off incidents, refusal of orders forWandsworth LBC v Hargreavesnuisance or annoyance:ordinary use of premisesSampson v Hodson-Pressingernuisance or annoyance:past obsessions with neighboursKnowsley Housing Trust v McMullennuisance or annoyance:perpetrator leaving premisesLondon and Quadrant Housing Trust v Rootnuisance or annoyance:petrol bombsWandsworth LBC v Hargreavesnuisance or annoyance:pointless, judges viewing suspended orders asNorwich CC v Famuyiwanuisance or annoyance:possession orders:abusive and menacing language, no orders whereWoking BC v Bistramnuisance or annoyance:possession orders:anti-social behaviour ordersLondon and Quadrant Housing Trust v RootManchester CC v Higginsnuisance or annoyance:possession orders:criminal offencesNorth Devon Homes Ltd v Batchelornuisance or annoyance:possession orders:dogs, intention to continue keepingSheffield CC v Greennuisance or annoyance:possession orders:drugs convictionsNorth Devon Homes Ltd v BatchelorKnowsley Housing Trust v Prescottnuisance or annoyance:possession orders:hearsaySolon South West Housing Association Ltd v Jamesnuisance or annoyance:possession orders:High Court, jurisdiction ofSheffield CC v Fletchernuisance or annoyance:possession orders:inevitability of outright ordersSheffield CC v Fletchernuisance or annoyance:possession orders:lesser alternatives, absence ofCDS Housing v Bellisnuisance or annoyance:possession orders:one-off incidents, refusal forWandsworth LBC v Hargreavesnuisance or annoyance:possession orders:perpetrator leaving premisesLondon and Quadrant Housing Trust v Rootnuisance or annoyance:possession orders:postponementKnowsley Housing Trust v PrescottManchester CC v Finnnuisance or annoyance:possession orders:pretexts for gaining possession, where incidents areMatthews v Ahmednuisance or annoyance:possession orders:private and family life, right to respect forCastle Vale Housing Action Trust v Gallaghernuisance or annoyance:possession orders:proportionalityCastle Vale Housing Action Trust v Gallaghernuisance or annoyance:possession orders:racial harassment by childrenWest Kent Housing Association v Daviesnuisance or annoyance:possession orders:reasonablenessBreach of obligation and anti-social behaviourAccent Peerless Ltd (formerly Surrey Heath Housing Association Ltd) v KingsdonBarking and Dagenham LBC v Hyatt and HyattBedfordshire Pilgrims Housing Association Ltd v KhanBrent LBC v DoughanBristol CC v MousahCDS Housing v BellisCamden LBC v GilsenanCanterbury CC v LoweCastle Vale Housing Action Trust v GallagherCroydon LBC v MoodyDarlington BC v SterlingGreenwich LBC v GroganKnowsley Housing Trust v McMullenLambeth LBC v HowardLeeds and Yorkshire Housing Association v VertiganLondon and Quadrant Housing Trust v RootManchester CC v HigginsMatthews v AhmedNew Charter Housing (North) Ltd v AshcroftNewcastle upon Tyne CC v MorrisonNorth Devon Homes Ltd v BatchelorNorwich CC v FamuyiwaSheffield CC v GreenSheffield CC v JepsonSheffield CC v ShawSolon South West Housing Association Ltd v JamesWandsworth LBC v HargreavesWandsworth LBC v WebbWest Kent Housing Association v DaviesWoking BC v BistramKnowsley Housing Trust v PrescottSheffield CC v Fletchernuisance or annoyance:possession orders:rehearingsSheffield CC v Jepsonnuisance or annoyance:possession orders:remorse, outright orders where tenant shows noManchester CC v Higginsnuisance or annoyance:possession orders:suspended possession ordersPortsmouth CC v BryantCanterbury CC v LoweKnowsley Housing Trust v McMullenLeeds and Yorkshire Housing Association v VertiganNew Charter Housing (North) Ltd v AshcroftNorwich CC v Famuyiwanuisance or annoyance:possession orders:wrong in principle, suspension notPortsmouth CC v Bryantnuisance or annoyance:postponement of ordersKnowsley Housing Trust v PrescottManchester CC v Finnnuisance or annoyance:pretexts for gaining possession, where incidents areMatthews v Ahmednuisance or annoyance:priority needR v Bristol CC ex p Bradicnuisance or annoyance:private and family life, right to respect forCastle Vale Housing Action Trust v Gallaghernuisance or annoyance:proportionalityCastle Vale Housing Action Trust v Gallaghernuisance or annoyance:prosecutions, wrongly taking into account unsuccessfulWandsworth LBC v Webbnuisance or annoyance:psychiatric evidenceCroydon LBC v Moodynuisance or annoyance:public interestGreenwich LBC v Grogannuisance or annoyance:public nuisanceNottingham CC v Zain (a minor)nuisance or annoyance:racial harassment by childrenWest Kent Housing Association v Daviesnuisance or annoyance:range of orders open to judge, suspension withinLeeds and Yorkshire Housing Association v Vertigannuisance or annoyance:reasonableness of possession ordersBreach of obligation and anti-social behaviourAccent Peerless Ltd (formerly Surrey Heath Housing Association Ltd) v KingsdonBarking and Dagenham LBC v Hyatt and HyattBedfordshire Pilgrims Housing Association Ltd v KhanBrent LBC v DoughanBristol CC v MousahCDS Housing v BellisCamden LBC v GilsenanCanterbury CC v LoweCastle Vale Housing Action Trust v GallagherCroydon LBC v MoodyDarlington BC v SterlingGreenwich LBC v GroganKnowsley Housing Trust v McMullenLambeth LBC v HowardLeeds and Yorkshire Housing Association v VertiganLondon and Quadrant Housing Trust v RootManchester CC v HigginsMatthews v AhmedNew Charter Housing (North) Ltd v AshcroftNewcastle upon Tyne CC v MorrisonNorth Devon Homes Ltd v BatchelorNorwich CC v FamuyiwaSheffield CC v GreenSheffield CC v JepsonSheffield CC v ShawSolon South West Housing Association Ltd v JamesWandsworth LBC v HargreavesWandsworth LBC v WebbWest Kent Housing Association v DaviesWoking BC v BistramKnowsley Housing Trust v PrescottSheffield CC v Fletchernuisance or annoyance:regret, inappropriate where tenants show noNew Charter Housing (North) Ltd v Ashcroftnuisance or annoyance:rehearingsSheffield CC v Jepsonnuisance or annoyance:rehouse tenants, judges have no power to order councils toWatford BC v Simpsonnuisance or annoyance:reign of terror by children, outright orders whereNewcastle upon Tyne CC v Morrisonnuisance or annoyance:remorse, outright orders where tenant shows noManchester CC v Higginsnuisance or annoyance:Rent Act tenanciesAnti-social behaviourAbrahams v WilsonCobstone Investments Ltd v MaximFrederick Platts Co Ltd v Grigornuisance or annoyance:secure tenanciesAnti-social behaviourAnti-social behaviour (Housing Acts 1985 and 1988)Croydon LBC v CrawfordHarlow DC v SewellKensington Housing Trust v OliverPortsmouth CC v BryantWatford BC v SimpsonSheffield CC v Fletchernuisance or annoyance:sensitive tenants next to each other, placingBrent LBC v Doughannuisance or annoyance:serious harassment of young girls, refusal of outright orders despiteSheffield CC v Shawnuisance or annoyance:setting aside possession ordersSheffield CC v Fletchernuisance or annoyance:settled accommodation and intentional homelessnessR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p PR v Newham LBC ex p Campbellnuisance or annoyance:spouses to leave, not askingR v Swansea CC ex p Johnnuisance or annoyance:statutory nuisanceCriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 and other ActsCunningham v Birmingham CCFarrar v Dover CCGreater London Council v Tower Hamlets LBCnuisance or annoyance:subtenanciesCornillie v Saha and Bradford and Bingley Building SocietyAnti-social behaviournuisance or annoyance:suspended possession ordersPortsmouth CC v Bryantnuisance or annoyance:suspended possession orders:control of childrenKnowsley Housing Trust v McMullennuisance or annoyance:suspended possession orders:exceptional circumstancesKnowsley Housing Trust v McMullennuisance or annoyance:suspended possession orders:imprisonmentNew Charter Housing (North) Ltd v Ashcroftnuisance or annoyance:suspended possession orders:injunctions, availability ofCanterbury CC v Lowenuisance or annoyance:suspended possession orders:notice, orders for application onKnowsley Housing Trust v McMullennuisance or annoyance:suspended possession orders:pointless, judges viewing suspension asNorwich CC v Famuyiwanuisance or annoyance:suspended possession orders:range of orders open to judge, withinLeeds and Yorkshire Housing Association v Vertigannuisance or annoyance:suspended possession orders:regret, inappropriate where tenants show noNew Charter Housing (North) Ltd v Ashcroftnuisance or annoyance:suspended possession orders:wrong in principle, suspension notPortsmouth CC v Bryantnuisance or annoyance:suspended sentences, activation ofSandwell MBC v Preecenuisance or annoyance:telephone callsKhorasandjian v Bushnuisance or annoyance:television receptionHunter v Canary Wharf Ltdnuisance or annoyance:terrorised, where neighbours areWear Valley DC v Robsonnuisance or annoyance:undertakingsKensington Housing Trust v OliverLeeds and Yorkshire Housing Association v Vertigannuisance or annoyance:unsuccessful prosecutions, taking into accountWandsworth LBC v Webbnuisance or annoyance:urban living, conditions ofBrent LBC v Doughannuisance or annoyance:vandalismR v Gloucester CC ex p Milesnuisance or annoyance:very serious breachesBristol CC v Mousahnuisance or annoyance:visitors, conduct ofCamden LBC v Gilsenannuisance or annoyance:warrantsKnowsley Housing Trust v McMullenoccupancy vouchers as possessionsMirzayev v Azerbaijanoccupation as a residence:appealsRichards v Greenoccupation as a residence:armed conflicts, absences due toWigley v Leighoccupation as a residence:assured tenanciesOccupation as a residence; Rent Act 1977 s2(1)(a)occupation as a residence:family elsewhere, tenants living withRegalian Securities Ltd v Scheueroccupation as a residence:intention to returnBrickfield Properties Ltd v HughesTickner v Hearnoccupation as a residence:long periods, absence forOccupation as a residence; Rent Act 1977 s2(1)(a)Bevington v CrawfordBrickfield Properties Ltd v HughesGofor Investments v RobertsPrince v Robinsonoccupation as a residence:matrimonial home, wife occupying premises which were notHall v Kingoccupation as a residence:mental disabilities, persons withTickner v Hearnoccupation as a residence:neighbours, tenants driven out byStephens v Kerroccupation as a residence:nights a week, use only for severalBlanway Investments Ltd v Lynchoccupation as a residence:possession claimsCarphone Warehouse UK Ltd v MalekoutMoreland Properties (UK) Ltd v Dhokiaoccupation as a residence:prisoners’ wife leaving house with furnitureBrown v Brashoccupation as a residence:secure tenanciesOccupation as a residence; Rent Act 1977 s2(1)(a)occupation as a residence:sleep, use of flat merely forHampstead Way Investments Ltd v Lewis-Weareoccupation as a residence:subtenants, defence of possession claims byMoreland Properties (UK) Ltd v Dhokiaoccupation as a residence:temporary absencesOccupation as a residence; Rent Act 1977 s2(1)(a)Bevington v CrawfordBrickfield Properties Ltd v HughesGofor Investments v RobertsPrince v RobinsonRichards v GreenWigley v Leighoccupation as a residence:tuberculosis, due toWigley v Leighoccupy, right to:harassment and illegal eviction, damages forKing v Jacksonoccupy, right to:homelessness, definition ofR (B) v Southwark LBCRights of occupation: s175(1)Abdullah v Westminster CCFletcher v Brent LBCR (Sacupima) v Newham LBCR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p O’SullivanR v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p Mintonoccupy, right to:notice to quit by one spouseFletcher v Brent LBCoccupy, right to:prison cellsR (B) v Southwark LBComissionsTsfayo v UKDeliberate act or omissiononly or principal home, occupation asOccupation as only or principal home: Housing Act 1985 s81 and Housing Act 1988 s1(1)(b); Prohibition against subletting: Housing Act 1985 s93 and Housing Act 1988 s15ABrent LBC v CroninCrawley BC v SawyerGay v SheeranHammersmith and Fulham LBC v ClarkeHussey v Camden LBCJennings v Epping Forest DCLambeth LBC v VandraMerton LBC v SalamaMuir Group Housing Association Ltd v ThornleySutton LBC v SwannUjima Housing Association v AnsahAmoah v Barking and Dagenham LBCWaltham Forest CBHA v FanningNotting Hill Housing Trust v EtoriaMcLoughlin’s Curator Bonis v Motherwell DCoral hearingsLomotey v Enfield LBCorally, tenancies grantedRequirements for assured shorthold tenancyouster injunctions, breach ofLeicester CC v Lewisout of area placements:exceptional circumstancesR (W) v Sheffield CCout of area placements:homelessnessSuitability and out of area placementsR (Yumsak) v Enfield LBCR (W) v Sheffield CCout of area placements:private and family life, right to respect forR (Yumsak) v Enfield LBCovercrowding :abroad, accommodation situatedOsei v Southwark LBCovercrowding :continued occupation, reasonableness ofElrify v Westminster CCHarouki v Kensington and Chelsea RLBCR v Westminster CC ex p AlouatSabah Mohamoud v Greenwich LBCovercrowding :criminal offencesOvercrowdingovercrowding :evidenceHenry Smith’s Charity Trustees v Bartosiak-Jentysovercrowding :general assertions about overcrowding in districtSabah Mohamoud v Greenwich LBCovercrowding :grounds for possessionOvercrowdingovercrowding :homelessnessElrify v Westminster CCHarouki v Kensington and Chelsea RLBCR v Westminster CC ex p AlouatSabah Mohamoud v Greenwich LBCOsei v Southwark LBCMohamed v Westminster CCovercrowding :non-statutory overcrowdingR v Westminster CC ex p Alouatovercrowding :possession, ground forOvercrowdingovercrowding :Rent Act tenanciesOvercrowdingovercrowding :secure tenanciesOvercrowdingOvercrowding (Rent Act 1977 s101)Henry Smith’s Charity Trustees v Bartosiak-Jentysovercrowding :settled accommodation and intentional homelessnessMohamed v Westminster CCovercrowding :state of affairs, overcrowding as aHenry Smith’s Charity Trustees v Bartosiak-Jentysovercrowding :testElrify v Westminster CCoverflowsHawkins v Dhawanowner-occupiers and grounds for possessionOwner-occupiersowner-occupiers and grounds for possession:assured tenanciesOwner-occupiersReturning owner-occupier (Housing Act 1988 Sch 2 Ground 1)Boyle v VerrallHegab v ShamashMustafa v Ruddockowner-occupiers and grounds for possession:landlords or members of family, premises required forPremises required for landlord or member of family (Rent Act 1977 Sch 15 Case 9)Alexander v MohamadzadehAmaddio v DaltonBaker v MacIverBassett v FraserBostock v Tacher de la PagerieCoombes v ParryEvans v EngelsonGhelani v BowieHodges v BleeKidder v BirchManaton v EdwardsMansukhani v Sharkeyowner-occupiers and grounds for possession:Rent Act tenanciesOwner-occupiersPremises required for landlord or member of family (Rent Act 1977 Sch 15 Case 9)Alexander v MohamadzadehAmaddio v DaltonBaker v MacIverBassett v FraserBostock v Tacher de la PagerieCoombes v ParryEvans v EngelsonGhelani v BowieHodges v BleeKidder v BirchManaton v EdwardsMansukhani v Sharkeyowner-occupiers and grounds for possession:returning owner-occupiersReturning owner-occupier (Housing Act 1988 Sch 2 Ground 1)Boyle v VerrallHegab v ShamashMustafa v Ruddockpart of premises, occupation of :business premisesBroadway Investments Hackney Ltd v GrantPulleng v Curranpart of premises, occupation of :joint tenanciesGay v Sheeranpart of premises, occupation of :non-use of business partPulleng v Curranpart of premises, occupation of :security of tenureBroadway Investments Hackney Ltd v Grantpart of premises, occupation of :subtenanciesMerton LBC v Salamapart of premises, occupation of :suitable alternative accommodationMykolyshyn v NoahYoland Ltd v Reddingtonpatch repairs to roofsDame Margaret Hungerford Charity Trustees v BeazeleyMurray v Birmingham CCpaths:dangerous pathsLips v Olderpaths:negligenceLips v Olderpaths:rear paths, implied term to maintainKing v South Northamptonshire DCpaving slabsBoldack (minor) v East Lindsey DCpeaceful enjoyment of possession:Article 1 Protocol 1Brezovec v CroatiaBukovčanová v SlovakiaGauci v MaltaKunic v CroatiaSpath Holme Ltd v UKTuleshov v RussiaUrbárska Obec Trencianske Biskupice v SlovakiaVelikovi v BulgariaVeselinski v Former Yugoslav Republic of MacedoniaVijatović v Croatiapeaceful enjoyment of possessions:Communist regime, restoration of property confiscated duringVelikovi v Bulgariapeaceful enjoyment of possessions:compulsory letting at low rentUrbárska Obec Trencianske Biskupice v Slovakiapeaceful enjoyment of possessions:expropriation, compensation forVelikovi v Bulgariapeaceful enjoyment of possessions:fair hearing, right to aMirzayev v Azerbaijanpeaceful enjoyment of possessions:good faith, acquisition inVelikovi v Bulgariapeaceful enjoyment of possessions:legitimate expectationsVeselinski v Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedoniapeaceful enjoyment of possessions:mortgage possession proceedingsBarclays Bank v Alcornpeaceful enjoyment of possessions:occupancy vouchersMirzayev v Azerbaijanpeaceful enjoyment of possessions:proportionalityVelikovi v Bulgariapeaceful enjoyment of possessions:public interestVelikovi v Bulgariapeaceful enjoyment of possessions:purchase flats, claims toVeselinski v Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedoniapeaceful enjoyment of possessions:rent controlUrbárska Obec Trencianske Biskupice v Slovakiapenal noticesTrustee in Bankruptcy of Canty v CantyR v Wandsworth County Court ex p Munnpending appeals, discretion to accommodateBrookes v Croydon LBCFrancis v Kensington and Chelsea RLBCLewis v Havering LBCR v Brighton and Hove Council ex p Nacionpending appeals, discretion to accommodate:county courtsFrancis v Kensington and Chelsea RLBCpending appeals, discretion to accommodate:discharge of dutyBrookes v Croydon LBCFrancis v Kensington and Chelsea RLBCLewis v Havering LBCR v Brighton and Hove Council ex p Nacionpending appeals, discretion to accommodate:groundsLewis v Havering LBCpending appeals, discretion to accommodate:homelessnessBrookes v Croydon LBCFrancis v Kensington and Chelsea RLBCLewis v Havering LBCR v Brighton and Hove Council ex p Nacionpending appeals, discretion to accommodate:judicial reviewFrancis v Kensington and Chelsea RLBCpending appeals, discretion to accommodate:practicalities of second appealsBrookes v Croydon LBCpending appeals, discretion to accommodate:second appeals, refusal ofBrookes v Croydon LBCpending appeals, discretion to accommodate:transfer to county courtsFrancis v Kensington and Chelsea RLBCpending decisions, duty to accommodate:homelessnessMohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham LBCpending decisions, duty to accommodate:local connection referralsMohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham LBCpending reviews, discretion to accommodateR v Camden LBC ex p MohammedR v Newham LBC ex p LumleyR (Abdi) v Lambeth LBCR (Antoine) v Reigate and Banstead DC and First Secretary of StateR (Araya) v Leeds CCR (Hassan) v Croydon LBCR (Paul-Coker) v Southwark LBCpending reviews, discretion to accommodate:Chagos IslandersR (Antoine) v Reigate and Banstead DC and First Secretary of Statepending reviews, discretion to accommodate:Children Act duties, consideration ofR (Hassan) v Croydon LBCpending reviews, discretion to accommodate:decisions unlawful, where originalR v Newham LBC ex p Lumleypending reviews, discretion to accommodate:discharge of dutyR v Camden LBC ex p MohammedR v Newham LBC ex p LumleyR (Abdi) v Lambeth LBCR (Antoine) v Reigate and Banstead DC and First Secretary of StateR (Araya) v Leeds CCR (Hassan) v Croydon LBCR (Paul-Coker) v Southwark LBCpending reviews, discretion to accommodate:fairnessR (Abdi) v Lambeth LBCpending reviews, discretion to accommodate:guidanceR v Camden LBC ex p Mohammedpending reviews, discretion to accommodate:habitual residenceR (Antoine) v Reigate and Banstead DC and First Secretary of Statepending reviews, discretion to accommodate:homelessnessMohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham LBCR v Camden LBC ex p MohammedR v Newham LBC ex p LumleyR (Abdi) v Lambeth LBCR (Antoine) v Reigate and Banstead DC and First Secretary of StateR (Araya) v Leeds CCR (Hassan) v Croydon LBCR (Paul-Coker) v Southwark LBCpending reviews, discretion to accommodate:lip service paid to Mohammed principlesR (Paul-Coker) v Southwark LBCpending reviews, discretion to accommodate:local connection and referralMohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham LBCpending reviews, discretion to accommodate:principlesR (Paul-Coker) v Southwark LBCpending reviews, discretion to accommodate:requests made, no duty untilR v Newham LBC ex p Lumleypending reviews, discretion to accommodate:short notice of requirement to moveR (Araya) v Leeds CCpermanent accommodation :landlords or members of family, premises required forNaish v Curzonpermanent accommodation :legitimate expectationsR (Bibi (No 1) and Al-Nashed) v Newham LBCpermanent accommodation :promisesR (Bibi (No 1) and Al-Nashed) v Newham LBCpermanent accommodation :rent arrears, persons withR v Newham LBC ex p Miah (Askir)personal circumstances, consideration of :allocationR v Canterbury CC ex p Gillespiepersonal circumstances, consideration of :continued occupation, reasonableness ofNoh v Hammersmith and Fulham LBCpersonal circumstances, consideration of :Gypsies and TravellersR v Wolverhampton MBC ex p Dunnepersonal circumstances, consideration of :homelessnessNoh v Hammersmith and Fulham LBCR v Brent LBC ex p Omarpersonal circumstances, consideration of :interim possession ordersR v Wolverhampton MBC ex p Dunnepersonal circumstances, consideration of :suitability of accommodationR v Brent LBC ex p OmarR v Newham LBC ex p Ojuri (No 3)personal injury:burns from hot pipesBoateng v Camden LBCpersonal injury:childrenConroy v Hire Token Ltdpersonal injury:coughs and coldsConroy v Hire Token Ltdpersonal injury:Defective Premises Act 1972Defective Premises Act 1972personal injury:disrepairMillington v Islington LBCStevens v Blaenau Gwent CBCLavimizadeh v Lambeth LBCConroy v Hire Token Ltdpersonal injury:time limits, extension ofMillington v Islington LBCpersonal injury:windows:broken glass inLavimizadeh v Lambeth LBCpersonal injury:windows:locks, injury to children where there are noStevens v Blaenau Gwent CBCpersonal representativesPatel v Patelpetrol bombsWandsworth LBC v Hargreavesphysical signs of continued occupationCrawley BC v Sawyerpipes:burns caused by hot pipesBoateng v Camden LBCpipes:burst pipesPassley v Wandsworth LBCpipes:frozen pipesStockley v Knowsley MBCpipes:laggingWycombe Area Health Authority v Barnettpipes:overflowHawkins v DhawanplanningKunic v CroatiaBillson v Residential Apartments Ltd (No 2)plasterHussein v MehlmanGrand v GillStaves v Leeds CCpointsR (Lin) v Barnet LBCpolice:domestic violence, seeking protection fromR v Croydon LBC ex p Tothpolice:duty of valueCowan v Chief Constable for Avon and Somerset Constabularypolice:protection from violence, seekingR v Croydon LBC ex p Tothpolice:rent and rate free accommodationHolmes v South Yorkshire Police AuthorityPoor LawsIntroductionpositive obligation:article 8Bah v UKChapman v UKMazari v ItalyO’Rourke v UKX v FRGX, Y & Z v United KingdomPossession: deprivation of, Article 1 Protocol 1JA Pye (Oxford) Ltd v United KingdomJames v UKMedvedev v RussiaPossession: enforcement, Article 1 Protocol 1Kletsova v RussiaKrestyaninovy v RussiaMalinovskiy v RussiaPossession: enforcement, delay in, Article 1 Protocol 1Palumbo v ItalyPossession: property as, First Protocol Art 1Article 1 of the First Protocol: Protection of propertyPossession: property rights, Article 1 Protocol 1SL and JL v CroatiaPossession: protection of property, Article 1 Protocol 1Mellacher v Austriapossession orders, enforcement: Article 8Budimir v Croatiapossession orders, enforcement:article 8Surugiu v RomaniaBelchikova v RussiaBjedov v CroatiaBrežec v CroatiaBuckland v UKConnors v UKĆosić v CroatiaGustovarac v CroatiaHorie v UKKay v UKLemo and others v CroatiaMcCann v UKOffice public d’habitation de la Ville de Paris v YedeiOrlić v CroatiaPaulić v CroatiaPinnock and Walker v UKStanková v SlovakiaTuleshov v RussiaVelosa Barretto v PortugalWood v UKYordanova and others v BulgariaZehentner v AustriaZrilić v Croatiapossession orders, enforcement:Equality Act 2010Equality Act 2010possession orders, enforcement:failure to comply with possession ordersTuohy v Bellpossession orders, enforcement:fair hearing, right to aPalumbo v ItalyPanteleeva v UkraineR (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset Policepossession orders, enforcement:false statementsTenancy obtained by false statementLewisham LBC v Adeyemi/Lewisham LBC v AkinsolaNorth Herts DC v CarthyRushcliffe BC v WatsonShrewsbury and Atcham BC v EvansSouthwark LBC v Erekinpossession orders, enforcement:formalities, not merits, consideration ofR v Wolverhampton MBC ex p Dunnepossession orders, enforcement:gardens, deterioration ofHolloway v Poveypossession orders, enforcement:gratifying wishes, reasonableness ofShrimpton v Rabbitspossession orders, enforcement:Gypsies and TravellersR v Wealden DC ex p Wales; R v Lincolnshire CC ex p AtkinsonR v Wolverhampton MBC ex p DunneR (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset PoliceShropshire CC v WynneWard v Hillingdon LBCpossession orders, enforcement:hearsaySolon South West Housing Association Ltd v Jamespossession orders, enforcement:homelessnessGreen and Coyne v Croydon LBCpossession orders, enforcement:humanitarian considerationsR v Wealden DC ex p Wales; R v Lincolnshire CC ex p Atkinsonpossession orders, enforcement:inhuman or degrading treatmentR (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset Policepossession orders, enforcement:interim ordersInterim possession orders and removal directionsMetropolitan Housing Trust v Ali and Persons UnknownR v Wealden DC ex p Wales; R v Lincolnshire CC ex p AtkinsonR v Wolverhampton MBC ex p DunneR (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset PoliceShropshire CC v WynneWard v Hillingdon LBCpossession orders, enforcement:joint borrowersAlbany Home Loans Ltd v Masseypossession orders, enforcement:judgments, references to reasonableness inManchester CC v Greenpossession orders, enforcement:judicial saleZehentner v Austriapossession orders, enforcement:legitimate aimVelosa Barretto v Portugalpossession orders, enforcement:lesser alternatives, absence ofCDS Housing v Bellispossession orders, enforcement:mortgage possession proceedingsAbbey National v Gibsonpossession orders, enforcement:mortgagesWood v UKpossession orders, enforcement:necessary in a democratic societyStanková v SlovakiaManchester CC v Pinnockpossession orders, enforcement:new orders for possession, grant ofManchester CC v Pinnock (No 2)possession orders, enforcement:notice to quitCrawley BC v Urepossession orders, enforcement:nuisance and annoyanceLondon and Quadrant Housing Trust v RootManchester CC v HigginsMatthews v Ahmedpossession orders, enforcement:nuisance and annoyance:abusive and menacing language, no orders whereWoking BC v Bistrampossession orders, enforcement:nuisance and annoyance:anti-social behaviour ordersLondon and Quadrant Housing Trust v RootManchester CC v Higginspossession orders, enforcement:nuisance and annoyance:criminal offencesNorth Devon Homes Ltd v Batchelorpossession orders, enforcement:nuisance and annoyance:dogs, intention to continue keepingSheffield CC v Greenpossession orders, enforcement:nuisance and annoyance:drugs convictionsNorth Devon Homes Ltd v BatchelorKnowsley Housing Trust v Prescottpossession orders, enforcement:nuisance and annoyance:hearsaySolon South West Housing Association Ltd v Jamespossession orders, enforcement:nuisance and annoyance:High Court, jurisdiction ofSheffield CC v Fletcherpossession orders, enforcement:nuisance and annoyance:inevitability of outright ordersSheffield CC v Fletcherpossession orders, enforcement:nuisance and annoyance:lesser alternatives, absence ofCDS Housing v Bellispossession orders, enforcement:nuisance and annoyance:one-off incidents, refusal forWandsworth LBC v Hargreavespossession orders, enforcement:nuisance and annoyance:perpetrator leaving premisesLondon and Quadrant Housing Trust v Rootpossession orders, enforcement:nuisance and annoyance:postponementKnowsley Housing Trust v Prescottpossession orders, enforcement:nuisance and annoyance:pretexts for gaining possession, where incidents areMatthews v Ahmedpossession orders, enforcement:nuisance and annoyance:private and family life, right to respect forCastle Vale Housing Action Trust v Gallagherpossession orders, enforcement:nuisance and annoyance:proportionalityCastle Vale Housing Action Trust v Gallagherpossession orders, enforcement:nuisance and annoyance:racial harassment by childrenWest Kent Housing Association v Daviespossession orders, enforcement:nuisance and annoyance:reasonablenessBreach of obligation and anti-social behaviourAccent Peerless Ltd (formerly Surrey Heath Housing Association Ltd) v KingsdonBarking and Dagenham LBC v Hyatt and HyattBedfordshire Pilgrims Housing Association Ltd v KhanBrent LBC v DoughanBristol CC v MousahCDS Housing v BellisCamden LBC v GilsenanCanterbury CC v LoweCastle Vale Housing Action Trust v GallagherCroydon LBC v MoodyDarlington BC v SterlingGreenwich LBC v GroganKnowsley Housing Trust v McMullenLambeth LBC v HowardLeeds and Yorkshire Housing Association v VertiganLondon and Quadrant Housing Trust v RootManchester CC v HigginsMatthews v AhmedNew Charter Housing (North) Ltd v AshcroftNewcastle upon Tyne CC v MorrisonNorth Devon Homes Ltd v BatchelorNorwich CC v FamuyiwaSheffield CC v GreenSheffield CC v JepsonSheffield CC v ShawSolon South West Housing Association Ltd v JamesWandsworth LBC v HargreavesWandsworth LBC v WebbWest Kent Housing Association v DaviesWoking BC v BistramKnowsley Housing Trust v PrescottSheffield CC v Fletcherpossession orders, enforcement:nuisance and annoyance:rehearingsSheffield CC v Jepsonpossession orders, enforcement:nuisance and annoyance:remorse, outright orders where tenant shows noManchester CC v Higginspossession orders, enforcement:nuisance and annoyance:wrong in principle, suspension notPortsmouth CC v Bryantpossession orders, enforcement:nullity, warrants issued prior to date of possession aTuohy v Bellpossession orders, enforcement:one-off incidentsWandsworth LBC v Hargreavespossession orders, enforcement:outright orders:appeals, no compelling reason for secondPlymouth CC v Hoskinpossession orders, enforcement:outright orders:county court, continuing remedies inPlymouth CC v Hoskinpossession orders, enforcement:outright orders:variation of postponed ordersManchester CC v Finnpossession orders, enforcement:payment of arrears, setting aside warrants afterMerton LBC v Hashmipossession orders, enforcement:penal noticesTrustee in Bankruptcy of Canty v Cantypossession orders, enforcement:personal circumstances after making orders, enquiries intoR v Wolverhampton MBC ex p Dunnepossession orders, enforcement:postponementBoyland & Sons Ltd v Randpossession orders, enforcement:postponement:appealsKnowsley Housing Trust v Prescottpossession orders, enforcement:postponement:breachWandsworth LBC v Whibleypossession orders, enforcement:postponement:date for possessionAustin v Southwark LBCWandsworth LBC v Whibleypossession orders, enforcement:postponement:death, due toAustin v Southwark LBCpossession orders, enforcement:postponement:enforcementBoyland & Sons Ltd v Randpossession orders, enforcement:postponement:nuisance and annoyanceKnowsley Housing Trust v Prescottpossession orders, enforcement:postponement:rent arrearsManchester CC v Finnpossession orders, enforcement:postponement:successionAustin v Southwark LBCpossession orders, enforcement:preliminary issues determined on facts without fact-finding exerciseSouthwark LBC v O’Sullivanpossession orders, enforcement:pretexts for gaining possession, where incidents areMatthews v Ahmedpossession orders, enforcement:prima facie meaning, court should not go behindCapital Prime Plus plc v Willspossession orders, enforcement:private and family life and home, right to respect forCrawley BC v UreR (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset PoliceWard v Hillingdon LBCpossession orders, enforcement:private and family life and home, right to respect for:interim possession ordersR (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset PoliceWard v Hillingdon LBCpossession orders, enforcement:private and family life and home, right to respect for:judicial saleZehentner v Austriapossession orders, enforcement:private and family life and home, right to respect for:legitimate aimVelosa Barretto v Portugalpossession orders, enforcement:private and family life and home, right to respect for:mortgage borrowersWood v UKpossession orders, enforcement:private and family life and home, right to respect for:necessary in a democratic societyStanková v Slovakiapossession orders, enforcement:private and family life and home, right to respect for:private landlordsVelosa Barretto v Portugalpossession orders, enforcement:private and family life and home, right to respect for:proportionalityZehentner v Austriapossession orders, enforcement:private and family life and home, right to respect for:security of tenureAdministrative law and human rights defencespossession orders, enforcement:private landlordsVelosa Barretto v Portugalpossession orders, enforcement:proportionalityZehentner v AustriaCastle Vale Housing Action Trust v Gallagherpossession orders, enforcement:Protection from Eviction Act 1977Polarpark Enterprises Inc v Allasonpossession orders, enforcement:racial harassment by childrenWest Kent Housing Association v Daviespossession orders, enforcement:reasonablenessBreach of obligation and anti-social behaviourAccent Peerless Ltd (formerly Surrey Heath Housing Association Ltd) v KingsdonBarking and Dagenham LBC v Hyatt and HyattBedfordshire Pilgrims Housing Association Ltd v KhanBrent LBC v Doughanpossession orders, enforcement:rehearingsSheffield CC v Jepsonpossession orders, enforcement:remorse, outright orders where tenant shows noManchester CC v Higginspossession orders, enforcement:removal directionsWard v Hillingdon LBCpossession orders, enforcement:Rent Act tenanciesIntroduction and general considerationspossession orders, enforcement:rent arrears, payment ofMerton LBC v Hashmipossession orders, enforcement:rent arrears:55 years to pay of arrears, where it would takeTaj v Ali (No 1)possession orders, enforcement:rent arrears:conduct of tenants, reasonableness ofSopwith v Stutchburypossession orders, enforcement:rent arrears:low arrearsSopwith v Stutchburypossession orders, enforcement:rent arrears:paymentDellenty v PellowMerton LBC v Hashmipossession orders, enforcement:rent arrears:postponementManchester CC v Finnpossession orders, enforcement:rent arrears:prima facie meaning, court should not go behindCapital Prime Plus plc v Willspossession orders, enforcement:rent arrears:reasonablenessDellenty v PellowRent arrearsBrent LBC v MarksBurgoyne v GriffithsHaringey LBC v StewartHayman v RowlandsLaimond Properties Ltd v RaeuchleLambeth LBC v HenryLambeth LBC v ThomasLee-Steere v JenningsSecond WRVS Housing Society v BlairSopwith v StutchburyTaj v Ali (No 1)Woodspring DC v Taylorpossession orders, enforcement:rent arrears:water chargesLambeth LBC v Thomaspossession orders, enforcement:reoccupation by different persons, enforcement of writ whereAnchor HA v Person Unknownpossession orders, enforcement:repairs, possession refused where tenants had allowed access forEmpson v Fordepossession orders, enforcement:replacement tenanciesThe effect of possession orders – in generalpossession orders, enforcement:res judicataUCB Bank plc v Chandlerpossession orders, enforcement:revival of tenanciesDunn v Bradford MDC; Marston v Leeds CCpossession orders, enforcement:secure tenanciesIntroduction and general considerationsThe effect of possession orders – in generalpossession orders, enforcement:security of tenureR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Quigleypossession orders, enforcement:subtenanciesCamden LBC v Shortlife Community Housing Ltd and Otherspossession orders, enforcement:successionAustin v Southwark LBCpossession orders, enforcement:suitable alternative accommodationLaimond Properties Ltd v Al-ShakarchiSuitable alternative accommodationBattlespring Ltd v GatesDawncar Investments Ltd v PlewsLee v WhitehouseMinchburn Estates Ltd v Fernandezpossession orders, enforcement:summary possessionWandsworth LBC v Whibleypossession orders, enforcement:Supreme CourtManchester CC v Pinnock (No 2)possession orders, enforcement:tolerated trespassersThe effect of possession orders – in generalpossession orders, enforcement:trespassersMcPhail v Persons UnknownSwordheath Properties Ltd v Floyddpossession orders, enforcement:trespassers:enforcementWiltshire CC v Frazer (No 2)Admiral Taverns (Cygnet) Ltd v Daniel and Dalypossession orders, enforcement:trespassers:tolerated trespassersThe effect of possession orders – in generalpossession orders, enforcement:vacant possessionTrustee in Bankruptcy of Canty v CantyAnchor HA v Person Unknownpossession orders, enforcement:vacated premises, no revival where tenants haveDunn v Bradford MDC; Marston v Leeds CCpossession orders, enforcement:variation of ordersManchester CC v Finnpossession orders, enforcement:warrants for possession:bailiffs entitlement to evict anyone found on premisesR v Wandsworth County Court ex p Wandsworth LBCpossession orders, enforcement:warrants for possession:continuation of tenanciesThe effect of possession orders – in generalpossession orders, enforcement:warrants for possession:date of possession, issue prior toTuohy v Bellpossession orders, enforcement:warrants for possession:nullity, warrants issued prior to date of possession aTuohy v Bellpossession orders, enforcement:warrants for possession:rent arrears, payment ofMerton LBC v Hashmipossession orders, enforcement:warrants for possession:setting asideMerton LBC v Hashmipossession orders, enforcement:water chargesLambeth LBC v Thomaspossession orders, enforcement:weight given to tenant’s needsEnfield LBC v Frenchpossession orders, enforcement:writs of restitutionWiltshire CC v Frazer (No 2)possession orders:abusive and menacing language, no orders whereWoking BC v Bistrampossession orders:after possession ordersThe effect of possession orders – in generalChurch Commissioners for England v Al-EmarahMerton LBC v Hashmipossession orders:all relevant circumstances, taking into accountCumming v Dansonpossession orders:allocationDixon v Wandsworth LBCpossession orders:anti-social behaviour ordersLondon and Quadrant Housing Trust v RootManchester CC v Higginspossession orders:appealsKnowsley Housing Trust v PrescottPlymouth CC v HoskinAdmiral Taverns (Cygnet) Ltd v Daniel and Dalypossession orders:assignmentCroydon LBC v Buston and Triancepossession orders:assured tenanciesLaimond Properties Ltd v Al-ShakarchiIntroduction and general considerationsThe effect of possession orders – in generalpossession orders:bailiffs:court bailiffs, without use ofHaniff v Robinsonpossession orders:bailiffs:entitlement to evict anyone found on premisesR v Wandsworth County Court ex p Wandsworth LBCpossession orders:bankruptcyHarlow DC v Hallpossession orders:breach of obligations as ground for possessionSouthwark LBC v O’SullivanKensington and Chelsea RLBC v SimmondsBreach of obligation and anti-social behaviourBarking and Dagenham LBC v Hyatt and Hyattpossession orders:cattle from land, removal ofBristol & West Investments plc v Tompkinspossession orders:childrenKensington and Chelsea RLBC v Simmondspossession orders:committal for contemptBristol & West Investments plc v TompkinsTuohy v Bellpossession orders:consent orders‘Consent orders’Appleton v AspinHounslow LBC v McBridePlaschkes v JonesR v Bloomsbury and Marylebone County Court ex p BlackburneR v Worthing BC ex p BruceSmith v McGoldrickWandsworth LBC v FadayomiR v Birmingham CC ex p FoleyR v Newcastle upon Tyne County Court ex p Thompsonpossession orders:continuation of tenancies until execution of warrantsThe effect of possession orders – in generalpossession orders:county courtsManchester CC v Pinnock (No 2)Plymouth CC v HoskinPolarpark Enterprises Inc v Allasonpossession orders:criminal offencesNorth Devon Homes Ltd v BatchelorInterim possession orders and removal directionspossession orders:date for possessionAustin v Southwark LBCWandsworth LBC v WhibleyTuohy v Bellpossession orders:degree, weight given to tenant’s needs as a matter ofEnfield LBC v Frenchpossession orders:delayPalumbo v ItalyPanteleeva v Ukrainepossession orders:demoted tenanciesManchester CC v Pinnockpossession orders:deterioration of garden until becoming a tenant, successors not liable forHolloway v Poveypossession orders:directions for removalR v Wealden DC ex p Wales; R v Lincolnshire CC ex p Atkinsonpossession orders:discretion H1, I3.2, L3,1Shropshire CC v Wynnepossession orders:dogs, intention to continue keepingSheffield CC v Greenpossession orders:drug convictionsNorth Devon Homes Ltd v BatchelorKnowsley Housing Trust v PrescottDixon v Wandsworth LBCpossession orders:effect of possession ordersThe effect of possession orders – in generalChurch Commissioners for England v Al-EmarahMerton LBC v Hashmipossession orders:eligible personsDixon v Wandsworth LBCpossession orders:enforcementBristol & West Investments plc v TompkinsR v Wandsworth County Court ex p Wandsworth LBCTrustee in Bankruptcy of Canty v CantyTuohy v BellAnchor HA v Person UnknownSix Arlington Street Investments v Persons UnknownWiltshire CC v Frazer (No 2)Admiral Taverns (Cygnet) Ltd v Daniel and DalyBoyland & Sons Ltd v RandPolarpark Enterprises Inc v Allasonpossession orders:enforcement:bankruptcyHarlow DC v Hallpossession orders:enforcement:continuation of tenanciesThe effect of possession orders – in generalpossession orders:enforcement:county courtPolarpark Enterprises Inc v Allasonpossession orders:enforcement:fair hearing, right to aPalumbo v Italypossession proceedingsIntroductionpossession proceedings:adjournmentsAdjournmentsBates v Croydon LBCBrent LBC v AniedobeKingscastle Ltd v Owen-OwenNorth Camden Housing Cooperative Ltd v O’SullivanSpitaliotis v MorganVerrilli v IdigorasR v A Circuit Judge (sitting at Norwich County Court) ex p Wathenpossession proceedings:appealsAppealsEaling LBC v RichardsonLaw Land v SinclairMoat Housing Group South Ltd v Harris and HartlessTaj v Ali (No 2)possession proceedings:assured shorthold tenanciesIntroductionpossession proceedings:bankruptcyPossession claims and bankruptcyHarlow DC v Hallpossession proceedings:charging orders to be given notice, persons withCroydon (Unique) Ltd v Wrightpossession proceedings:Children Act servicesR v Hillingdon LBC ex p McDonaghpossession proceedings:Civil Procedure RulesIntroductionpossession proceedings:commencement of proceedingsPatel v SmeatonCamden LBC v MCommencement of proceedingsAlamo Housing Co-operative Ltd v MeredithChesters Accommodation Agency Ltd v AbebreseBarnet Primary Care Trust v XBirmingham CC v Hoseypossession proceedings:costsCostsChurch Commissioners for England v IbrahimHackney LBC v Campbellpossession proceedings:counterclaimsIslington LBC v Keanepossession proceedings:employees, formerWhitbread West Pennines Ltd v Reedypossession proceedings:enforcement of possession ordersCrawley BC v UreBristol & West Investments plc v TompkinsR v Wandsworth County Court ex p Wandsworth LBCTrustee in Bankruptcy of Canty v CantyTuohy v BellAnchor HA v Person UnknownSix Arlington Street Investments v Persons UnknownWiltshire CC v Frazer (No 2)Admiral Taverns (Cygnet) Ltd v Daniel and DalyBoyland & Sons Ltd v RandPolarpark Enterprises Inc v Allasonpossession proceedings:homeless personsR v Hillingdon LBC ex p McDonaghpossession proceedings:injunctionsInjunctions against tenants and third partiespossession proceedings:interim possession orders against trespassersIntroductionpossession proceedings:lay representation on rent arrears possession casesHackney LBC v Springpossession proceedings:licenseesManchester Airport plc v Duttonpossession proceedings:notice requiring possessionNotice requiring possession (Housing Act 1988 s21)Aylward v FawazBarker v HandsChurch Commissioners for England v MeyaElias v SpencerFernandez v McDonaldGracechurch International v Tribhovan and AbdulLower Street Properties v JonesNotting Hill Housing Trust v RoomusSingh v Emmanuelpossession proceedings:notice seeking possessionIntroduction12Notice of proceedings for possession (Housing Act 1988)Kelsey Housing Association v KingKnowsley Housing Trust v Revell; Helena Housing Ltd v CurtisMarath v MacGillivrayMountain v HastingsNorth British Housing Association v SheridanMcShane v William Sutton Trustpossession proceedings:occupation as a residenceCarphone Warehouse UK Ltd v MalekoutMoreland Properties (UK) Ltd v Dhokiapossession proceedings:private and family life, right to respect forAdministrative law and human rights defencespossession proceedings:proportionalityAdministrative law and human rights defencespossession proceedings:repairing covenantsIslington LBC v Keanepossession proceedings:representationRepresentationHackney LBC v Springpossession proceedings:section 21 noticesIntroductionpossession proceedings:security of tenureAdministrative law and human rights defencespossession proceedings:settlementsCarphone Warehouse UK Ltd v Malekoutpossession proceedings:subtenanciesMoreland Properties (UK) Ltd v Dhokiapossession proceedings:surrenderCoker v London Rent Assessment Panelpostponement of possession:appealsKnowsley Housing Trust v Prescottpostponement of possession:breach of possession ordersWandsworth LBC v Whibleypostponement of possession:date for possessionAustin v Southwark LBCWandsworth LBC v Whibleypostponement of possession:death, due toAustin v Southwark LBCpostponement of possession:enforcementBoyland & Sons Ltd v Randpostponement of possession:nuisance and annoyanceKnowsley Housing Trust v Prescottpostponement of possession:rent arrearsManchester CC v Finnpostponement of possession:successionAustin v Southwark LBCpreferences:date of new schemes, priority to run from beforeR (Faarah) v Southwark LBCpreferences:homeless personsGeneralpreferences:reasonable preferenceGeneralR (Kabashi) v Redbridge LBCReasonable preferenceR (Ahmad) v Newham LBCR v Wolverhampton MBC ex p WattersR (Lin) v Barnet LBCR (Babakandi) v Westminster CCpreferences:rent arrearsR v Wolverhampton MBC ex p Watterspreferences:schemesGeneralpreferences:statutory categoriesGeneralpreferences:transfersR (Ahmad) v Newham LBCpregnant women:bed and breakfast accommodationSuitability and out of area placementspregnant women:continued occupation, reasonableness ofR v Brent LBC ex p Yusufpregnant women:homelessnessR v Brent LBC ex p YusufR v Hackney LBC ex p AjayiSuitability and out of area placementsR v Newham LBC ex p Dadapregnant women:suitabilityR v Brent LBC ex p YusufSuitability and out of area placementsR v Newham LBC ex p Dadaprejudice:appealsMoat Housing Group South Ltd v Harris and Hartlessprejudice:possession orders, setting asideTower Hamlets LBC v Abadieprejudice:stay of proceedingsMoat Housing Group South Ltd v Harris and Hartlessprejudicial to health:accidents, risk ofR v Bristol CC ex p Everettprejudicial to health:definitionSFI Group plc v Gosport BCprejudicial to health:environmental health officers, assessment byO’Toole v Knowlsley MBCprejudicial to health:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings underCriminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 and other ActsBirmingham CC v OakleyR v Bristol CC ex p EverettSFI Group plc v Gosport BCO’Toole v Knowlsley MBCR (Vella) v Lambeth LBC and London and Quadrant Housing Trustprejudicial to health:expertsSouthwark LBC v Simpsonprejudicial to health:likelihood of illnessR v Bristol CC ex p Everettprejudicial to health:rooms, arrangement ofBirmingham CC v Oakleypriority need and homelessness:16–17 year olds16/17-year-oldsR (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBCpriority need and homelessness:16–17 year olds:assessment of needsR (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBCpriority need and homelessness:16–17 year olds:Children Act dutiesR (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBCpriority need and homelessnessPriority needpriority need and homelessness:assessment of needsR (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBCpriority need and homelessness:caravans, disappearance ofHiggs v Brighton and Hove CCpriority need and homelessness:categories, list ofPriority needpriority need and homelessness:childrenDependent childrenHolmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBCR v Lambeth LBC ex p VaglivelloHolmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBCHolmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBCpriority need and homelessness:children:Children Act servicesR (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBCpriority need and homelessness:children:family court ordersHolmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBCHolmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBCHolmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBCpriority need and homelessness:children:reside with applicant, need not wholly or completelyR v Lambeth LBC ex p Vaglivellopriority need and homelessness:children:wholly and exclusively dependent, need not beR v Lambeth LBC ex p Vaglivellopriority need and homelessness:definition of vulnerabilityVulnerablepriority need and homelessness:demolition ordersNoble v South Herefordshire DCpriority need and homelessness:disaster, meaning ofNoble v South Herefordshire DCpriority need and homelessness:drug addictionCrossley v Westminster CCpriority need and homelessness:emergenciesHomeless as a result of an emergencyHiggs v Brighton and Hove CCNoble v South Herefordshire DCR v Bristol CC ex p Bradicpriority need and homelessness:enquiries, inadequacy ofBenson v Lewisham LBCpriority need and homelessness:evicted, persons illegallyR v Bristol CC ex p Bradicpriority need and homelessness:exceptional circumstancesHolmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBCHolmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBCHolmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBCpriority need and homelessness:facts, evaluation of all theCrossley v Westminster CCpriority need and homelessness:family court ordersHolmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBCHolmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBCHolmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBCpriority need and homelessness:firesNoble v South Herefordshire DCpriority need and homelessness:floodsNoble v South Herefordshire DCpriority need and homelessness:guidanceVulnerableShala v Birmingham CCpriority need and homelessness:householdsPriority needpriority need and homelessness:institutionalised, whether prisoners have becomeKelly v Westminster CCpriority need and homelessness:intentional homelessnessCrawley BC v Bpriority need and homelessness:main housing dutyR v Brent LBC ex p Sadiqpriority need and homelessness:medical advisers, use ofShala v Birmingham CCSimms v Islington LBCpriority need and homelessness:medical evidenceAllison v Wandsworth LBCpriority need and homelessness:medical officers, adoption of opinion ofR v Lambeth LBC ex p Carrollpriority need and homelessness:other parent, where accommodated withHolmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBCHolmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBCHolmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBCpriority need and homelessness:other special reason:free-standing category, asR v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p Kiharapriority need and homelessness:Pereira testVulnerablepriority need and homelessness:prisonersKelly v Westminster CCpriority need and homelessness:reside with applicant, need not wholly or completelyR v Lambeth LBC ex p Vaglivellopriority need and homelessness:severe disability for benefit purposes, assessment ofMangion v Lewisham LBCpriority need and homelessness:single men with health problems, inadequate enquiries aboutBenson v Lewisham LBCpriority need and homelessness:vulnerable personsPriority needVulnerableAllison v Wandsworth LBCCrossley v Westminster CCMangion v Lewisham LBCR v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p KiharaShala v Birmingham CCSimms v Islington LBCR v Lambeth LBC ex p CarrollBenson v Lewisham LBCKelly v Westminster CCpriority need and homelessness:Wednesbury unreasonablenessKelly v Westminster CCpriority need and homelessness:wholly and exclusively dependent, need not beR v Lambeth LBC ex p Vaglivelloprisoners:homelessnessR (B) v Southwark LBCprisoners:housing benefitSaint v Barking and Dagenham LBCprisoners:institutionalised prisonersKelly v Westminster CCprisoners:long sentencesAmoah v Barking and Dagenham LBCNotting Hill Housing Trust v Etoriaprisoners:releaseNotting Hill Housing Trust v Etoriaprisoners:subtenanciesAmoah v Barking and Dagenham LBCNotting Hill Housing Trust v Etoriaprisoners:warrants of possession, setting asideSaint v Barking and Dagenham LBCprisoners:Wednesbury unreasonablenessKelly v Westminster CCprivate and family life and home, right to respect forSurugiu v RomaniaBelchikova v RussiaHorie v UKKay v UKOffice public d’habitation de la Ville de Paris v YedeiOrlić v CroatiaStanková v SlovakiaVelosa Barretto v PortugalWood v UKZehentner v Austriaprivate and family life and home, right to respect for:anti-sharing clausesOffice public d’habitation de la Ville de Paris v Yedeiprivate and family life and home, right to respect for:apologise, failure toR (Bernard) v Enfield LBCprivate and family life and home, right to respect for:bed and breakfast, signing in requirements atOrejudos v Kensington and Chelsea RLBCprivate and family life and home, right to respect for:conflicts of interestBelchikova v Russiaprivate and family life and home, right to respect for:damagesAnufrijeva v Southwark LBCR (Bernard) v Enfield LBCprivate and family life and home, right to respect for:delayAnufrijeva v Southwark LBCprivate and family life and home, right to respect for:demoted tenanciesManchester CC v Pinnockprivate and family life and home, right to respect for:eviction:conflicts of interestBelchikova v Russiaprivate and family life and home, right to respect for:eviction:explanations, provision ofOrlić v Croatiaprivate and family life and home, right to respect for:explanations, provision ofOrlić v Croatiaprivate and family life and home, right to respect for:families, members ofMichalak v Wandsworth LBCprivate and family life and home, right to respect for:Gypsies and TravellersR (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset PoliceWard v Hillingdon LBCCodona v Mid-Bedfordshire DCprivate and family life and home, right to respect for:homelessnessSharp v Brent LBCCodona v Mid-Bedfordshire DCOrejudos v Kensington and Chelsea RLBCR (Yumsak) v Enfield LBCprivate and family life and home, right to respect for:injunctions against trespassHorie v UKprivate and family life and home, right to respect for:interim possession ordersR (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset PoliceWard v Hillingdon LBCprivate and family life and home, right to respect for:judicial saleZehentner v Austriaprivate and family life and home, right to respect for:legitimate aimVelosa Barretto v Portugalprivate and family life and home, right to respect for:maladministrationAnufrijeva v Southwark LBCprivate and family life and home, right to respect for:mortgage borrowersWood v UKBarclays Bank v Alcornprivate and family life and home, right to respect for:necessary in a democratic societyStanková v Slovakiaprivate and family life and home, right to respect for:notice to quitCrawley BC v Ureprivate and family life and home, right to respect for:nuisance and annoyanceCastle Vale Housing Action Trust v Gallagherprivate and family life and home, right to respect for:out of area placementsR (Yumsak) v Enfield LBCprivate and family life and home, right to respect for:possession claims/orders:interim possession ordersR (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset PoliceWard v Hillingdon LBCprivate and family life and home, right to respect for:possession claims/orders:judicial saleZehentner v Austriaprivate and family life and home, right to respect for:possession claims/orders:legitimate aimVelosa Barretto v Portugalprivate and family life and home, right to respect for:possession claims/orders:mortgage borrowersWood v UKBarclays Bank v Alcornprivate and family life and home, right to respect for:possession claims/orders:necessary in a democratic societyStanková v Slovakiaprivate and family life and home, right to respect for:possession claims/orders:private landlordsVelosa Barretto v Portugalprivate and family life and home, right to respect for:possession claims/orders:proportionalityZehentner v Austriaprivate and family life and home, right to respect for:possession claims/orders:security of tenureAdministrative law and human rights defencesprivate and family life and home, right to respect for:possession claims/orders:setting aside warrantsSouthwark LBC v St Briceprivate and family life and home, right to respect for:private landlordsVelosa Barretto v Portugalprivate and family life and home, right to respect for:proportionalityKay v UKZehentner v Austriaprivate and family life and home, right to respect for:removal directionsWard v Hillingdon LBCprivate and family life and home, right to respect for:repeated interference, failure to stopSurugiu v Romaniaprivate and family life and home, right to respect for:same sex partnersGhaidan v Godin-Mendozaprivate and family life and home, right to respect for:security of tenureAdministrative law and human rights defencesPoplar Housing and Regeneration Community Association Ltd v Donoghueprivate and family life and home, right to respect for:successionMichalak v Wandsworth LBCGhaidan v Godin-MendozaSharp v Brent LBCprivate and family life and home, right to respect for:suitable accommodationR (Yumsak) v Enfield LBCR (Bernard) v Enfield LBCprivate and family life and home, right to respect for:trespassHorie v UKprivate sector :definitionPrivate sector leasing (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 6)private sector :licencesTower Hamlets LBC v Miahprivate sector :possession proceedingsVelosa Barretto v Portugalprivate sector :private and family life and home, right to respect forVelosa Barretto v Portugalprivate sector :public landlords, leases of property toPrivate sector leasing (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 6)Haringey LBC v HickeyTower Hamlets LBC v AbdiTower Hamlets LBC v MiahWestminster CC v Boraliuprivate sector :security of tenurePrivate sector leasing (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 6)Haringey LBC v HickeyTower Hamlets LBC v AbdiTower Hamlets LBC v MiahWestminster CC v Boraliuprivate sector :subtenancies by public landlordsPrivate sector leasing (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 6)Haringey LBC v HickeyTower Hamlets LBC v AbdiTower Hamlets LBC v MiahWestminster CC v Boraliuprivate sector :vacant possessionPrivate sector leasing (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 6)Haringey LBC v HickeyTower Hamlets LBC v AbdiTower Hamlets LBC v MiahWestminster CC v Boraliuprohibition noticesLocal authority enforcementHanley v Tameside MBCpromissory estoppelEmery v UCB Bank plcproper working orderO’Connor v Old Etonians Housing Association LtdVeolia Water Central Ltd v London Fire & Emergency Planning Authorityprostitution, premises used forBritish Petroleum Pension Trust v BehrendtProtection from Eviction Act 1977:breach of statutory dutyProtection from Eviction Act 1977 (civil provisions)Protection from Eviction Act 1977:civil provisionsCivil proceedingsProtection from Eviction Act 1977 (civil provisions)Desnousse v Newham LBCMcCall v AbeleszMohamed v Manek and Kensington and Chelsea RLBCPirabakaran v PatelSumeghova v McMahonRogerson v Wigan MBCProtection from Eviction Act 1977:county court, enforcement in thePolarpark Enterprises Inc v AllasonProtection from Eviction Act 1977:definition of occupierProtection from Eviction Act 1977 (civil provisions)Protection from Eviction Act 1977:exclusionsProtection from Eviction Act 1977 (civil provisions)Protection from Eviction Act 1977:forfeitureEaton Square Properties Ltd v BeveridgeProtection from Eviction Act 1977:gas and electricity, implied covenants to supplyMcCall v AbeleszProtection from Eviction Act 1977:harassment and illegal evictionCivil proceedingsProtection from Eviction Act 1977 (civil provisions)Desnousse v Newham LBCMcCall v AbeleszMohamed v Manek and Kensington and Chelsea RLBCPirabakaran v PatelSumeghova v McMahonRogerson v Wigan MBCProtection from Eviction Act 1977:homelessnessDesnousse v Newham LBCRogerson v Wigan MBCProtection from Eviction Act 1977:hostelsRogerson v Wigan MBCProtection from Eviction Act 1977:licencesProtection from Eviction Act 1977 (civil provisions)Desnousse v Newham LBCRogerson v Wigan MBCProtection from Eviction Act 1977:mixed residential/business premisesPirabakaran v PatelProtection from Eviction Act 1977:notice to quitIntroductionProtection from Eviction Act 1977 (civil provisions)Protection from Eviction Act 1977:possession ordersPolarpark Enterprises Inc v AllasonProtection from Eviction Act 1977:shared with landlord, where accommodation temporarilySumeghova v McMahonProtection from Eviction Act 1977:temporary accommodationMohamed v Manek and Kensington and Chelsea RLBCRogerson v Wigan MBCpsychiatric evidenceCroydon LBC v MoodyNoh v Hammersmith and Fulham LBCpsychological/psychiatric harmHunt v HussainYemshaw v Hounslow LBCpublic authorities:functional public authorities, housing associations asPoplar Housing and Regeneration Community Association Ltd v Donoghuepublic authorities:housing associationsR (Weaver) v London & Quadrant Housing TrustPoplar Housing and Regeneration Community Association Ltd v Donoghuepublic authorities:hybrid authoritiesAdministrative law and human rights defencespublic authorities:rent arrearsR (Weaver) v London & Quadrant Housing Trustpublic authorities:security of tenureAdministrative law and human rights defencesPoplar Housing and Regeneration Community Association Ltd v Donoghuepublic health and environmental protectionGwynedd CC v GrunshawLocal authority enforcementPollway Nominees Ltd v Croydon LBCR v Cardiff CC ex p CrossR v Mansfield DC ex p Ashfield NomineesR (Erskine) v Lambeth LBCBolton MBC v PatelHanley v Tameside MBCpublic health and environmental protection:appealsGwynedd CC v GrunshawR v Mansfield DC ex p Ashfield Nomineespublic health and environmental protection:ceilings, height ofHanley v Tameside MBCpublic health and environmental protection:clearance areasLocal authority enforcementpublic health and environmental protection:compulsory purchase ordersLocal authority enforcementpublic health and environmental protection:demolition ordersLocal authority enforcementpublic health and environmental protection:discriminationR (Erskine) v Lambeth LBCpublic health and environmental protection:disrepairGwynedd CC v GrunshawLocal authority enforcementPollway Nominees Ltd v Croydon LBCR v Cardiff CC ex p CrossR v Mansfield DC ex p Ashfield NomineesR (Erskine) v Lambeth LBCBolton MBC v PatelHanley v Tameside MBCpublic health and environmental protection:emergency remedial actionBolton MBC v Patelpublic health and environmental protection:hazard, concept ofLocal authority enforcementpublic health and environmental protection:hazard assessmentsBolton MBC v Patelpublic health and environmental protection:hazard awareness noticesLocal authority enforcementpublic health and environmental protection:Houses in Multiple OccupationLocal authority enforcementpublic health and environmental protection:Housing Health and Safety Rating System (HHSRS)Local authority enforcementpublic health and environmental protection:improvement noticesLocal authority enforcementpublic health and environmental protection:judicial reviewR v Mansfield DC ex p Ashfield Nomineespublic health and environmental protection:local authority enforcementGwynedd CC v GrunshawLocal authority enforcementPollway Nominees Ltd v Croydon LBCR v Cardiff CC ex p CrossR v Mansfield DC ex p Ashfield NomineesR (Erskine) v Lambeth LBCBolton MBC v PatelHanley v Tameside MBCpublic health and environmental protection:prohibition noticesLocal authority enforcementHanley v Tameside MBCpublic health and environmental protection:repairs noticesLocal authority enforcementPollway Nominees Ltd v Croydon LBCR v Cardiff CC ex p CrossR (Erskine) v Lambeth LBCpublic health and environmental protection:service on wrong personsPollway Nominees Ltd v Croydon LBCpublic health and environmental protection:steps, steepness ofHanley v Tameside MBCpublic interestVelikovi v BulgariaGreenwich LBC v Groganquiet enjoyment, covenant of :direct physical interference, breach withoutKenny v Preenquiet enjoyment, covenant of :disrepair, damages forThornton and Jarrett v Birmingham CCquiet enjoyment, covenant of :harassment and illegal evictionCivil proceedingsKenny v PreenQueensway Marketing Ltd v Associated Restaurants Ltdquiet enjoyment, covenant of :physical eviction not necessaryQueensway Marketing Ltd v Associated Restaurants Ltdquiet enjoyment, covenant of :repairing covenantsSouthwark LBC v Mills; Southwark LBC v Tanner; Baxter v Camden LBCquiet enjoyment, covenant of :scaffolding, erection ofQueensway Marketing Ltd v Associated Restaurants Ltdquota systems, operation of ad hocR (Babakandi) v Westminster CCrace:abuseKensington and Chelsea RLBC v Simmondsrace:breach of obligations as ground for possessionKensington and Chelsea RLBC v Simmondsrace:children, harassment byWest Kent Housing Association v Daviesrace:harassmentWest Kent Housing Association v Daviesrace:nuisance and annoyanceWest Kent Housing Association v Daviesrat infestation in drainsSarmad v Okellore-entry, forfeiture byBillson v Residential Apartments Ltdre-grant, surrender andMattey Securities Ltd v Ervinreasonableness:anti-social behaviourBreach of obligation and anti-social behaviourreasonableness:consent orders‘Consent orders’reasons:introductory tenanciesR (Forbes) v Lambeth LBCrectificationAlderson v Beetham Organisation Ltdredecoration after repairsMcDougall v Easington DCBradley v Chorley BCMcGreal v Wakeredevelopment, property required forTemporary use pending development (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 3)Attley v Cherwell DCHyde Housing Association Ltd v HarrisonLillieshall Road Housing Co-operative Ltd v BrennanProperty required for demolition or redevelopmentWansbeck DC v MarleySugarwhite v Afridireferrals:homelessnessR v Beverley BC ex p McPheeR v Southwark LBC ex p Dagoureferrals:Lettings Direct Scheme, referrals toR (Raw) v Lambeth LBCreferrals:rent assessment committeesRent regulation (assured tenants)R (Lester) v London Rent Assessment CommitteeR (Morris) v London Rent Assessment CommitteeEarl of Cadogan v ChehabGhani v London Rent Assessment CommitteeR (Innes) v Northern Rent Assessment Panelrefusal of offers:assured shorthold tenanciesGriffiths v St Helens Councilrefusal of offers:facts at date of refusalOsseily v Westminster CCrefusal of offers:homelessnessGriffiths v St Helens CouncilVilvarasa v Harrow LBCOsseily v Westminster CCrefusal of offers:previous warningsVilvarasa v Harrow LBCrefusal of offers:warningsVilvarasa v Harrow LBCregistered social landlordsIntroductory tenanciesrehearingsBracknell Forest BC v GreenEaling LBC v Richardsonreinstatement:harassment and illegal evictionHousing Act 1988 ss27 and 28Tagro v Cafane and Patelreinstatement:trespassersWhitbread West Pennines Ltd v Reedyremorse, outright orders where tenants show noManchester CC v Higginsrent:assured tenanciesRent regulation (assured tenants)Riverside Housing Association Ltd v WhiteBankway Properties v DunsfordContour Homes Ltd v RowenHughes v Borodex LtdR (Lester) v London Rent Assessment CommitteeR (Morris) v London Rent Assessment CommitteeTadema Holdings v FergusonEarl of Cadogan v ChehabGhani v London Rent Assessment CommitteeLondon District Properties Management Ltd v GoolamyN & D (London) Ltd v GadsonR v London Rent Assessment Panel ex p Cadogan EstatesR (Innes) v Northern Rent Assessment PanelRowe v South West Rent Assessment Panelrent:booksWestminster CC v BassonShaw v GroomRC Glaze Properties Ltd v AlabdinboniAndrews v Cunninghamrent:company letsEstavest Investments Ltd v Commercial Express Travel Ltdrent:controlUrbárska Obec Trencianske Biskupice v Slovakiarent:creation of tenanciesCreation of tenanciesrent:disrepair, damages for:40% of rentMzae v Abigorent:disrepair, damages for:50% of rentAslam v Alirent:disrepair, damages for:assessmentAslam v AliMurray v KellyMzae v Abigorent:disrepair, damages for:different items based on rentMurray v Kellyrent:disrepair, damages for:exceed rent, damages should notShine v English Churches Housing Grouprent:disrepair, damages for:fair rent, registration ofSturolson and Co v Maurouxrent:disrepair, damages for:foreseeable, loss of rent asMira v Aylmer Square Investments Ltdrent:disrepair, damages for:housing benefitWallace v Manchester CCrent:disrepair, damages for:liftsElectricity Supply Nominees Ltd v National Magazine Co Ltdrent:disrepair, damages for:loss of rental incomeIrontrain Investments Ltd v AnsariMira v Aylmer Square Investments Ltdrent:disrepair, damages for:repairing covenantsBrikom Investments Ltd v Seafordrent:employees, licences forRoyal Philanthropic Society v Countyrent:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings underCamden LBC v Gunbyrent:exclusive possessionNunn v DalrympleMansfield DC v Langridgerent:fair rent, registration ofSturolson and Co v Maurouxrent:family relationshipsNunn v DalrympleWard v Warnkerent:farm workers need no longer pay rent, agreements thatFoster v Robinsonrent:foreseeable, loss of rent asMira v Aylmer Square Investments Ltdrent:gas and electricity of bills as not being rent, payment ofBostock v Bryant and Anotherrent:housing benefitWallace v Manchester CCrent:Housing Revenue Account, costs improperly included inR v Ealing LBC ex p Lewisrent:leave premises owing rent, where tenantsPreston BC v Faircloughrent:licencesNunn v DalrympleWard v WarnkeMansfield DC v Langridgerent:liftsElectricity Supply Nominees Ltd v National Magazine Co Ltdrent:LondonTenancies at a high or low rent (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 paras 2 and 3 and Rent Act 1977 ss4–5)rent:loss of rental incomeIrontrain Investments Ltd v AnsariMira v Aylmer Square Investments Ltdrent:non-tenants, payment of rent byMattey Securities Ltd v Ervinrent:notice requiring possessionChurch Commissioners for England v Meyarent:owners as persons receiving rentCamden LBC v Gunbyrent:peaceful enjoyment of possessionsUrbárska Obec Trencianske Biskupice v Slovakiarent:policeHolmes v South Yorkshire Police Authorityrent:reasonablenessRents (secure tenants)R v Ealing LBC ex p LewisWandsworth LBC v Winder (No 2)rent:registrationBrikom Investments Ltd v Seafordrent:regulationRent regulation (assured tenants)Rent regulation (Rent Act 1977 tenants)rent:rent booksWestminster CC v BassonShaw v GroomRC Glaze Properties Ltd v AlabdinboniAndrews v Cunninghamrent:rent review clausesBankway Properties v DunsfordContour Homes Ltd v Rowenrent:secure tenanciesVariation of non-rent terms (secure tenants)Rents (secure tenants)R v Ealing LBC ex p LewisWandsworth LBC v Winder (No 2)rent:security of tenureTenancies at a high or low rent (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 paras 2 and 3 and Rent Act 1977 ss4–5)Bostock v Bryant and AnotherRents (secure tenants)R v Ealing LBC ex p LewisWandsworth LBC v Winder (No 2)Rent regulation (assured tenants)Rent regulation (Rent Act 1977 tenants)rent:separate dwelling, let as aMansfield DC v Langridgerent:services or moneyCreation of tenanciesrent:shamsEstavest Investments Ltd v Commercial Express Travel Ltdrent:suspension of possession ordersVandermolen v Tomarent:unlawfulness of rent setR v Ealing LBC ex p Lewisrent:variation of termsVariation of non-rent terms (secure tenants)Palmer v Sandwell MBCR (Kilby) v Basildon DCR v Brent LBC ex p BlattRent Act tenancies :agricultural employeesAgricultural employeesRent Act tenancies :board and attendanceBoard and attendanceOtter v NormanNelson Developments Ltd v TaboadaRita Dale v Adrahill LtdRent Act tenancies :breach of obligations as ground for possessionBreach of obligationBreach of obligation (Rent Act 1977 Sch 15 Case 1)Cadogan Estates Ltd v McMahonFlorent v HorezRent Act tenancies :business tenanciesBusiness tenancies (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 11, Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 4 and Rent Act 1977 s24)Broadway Investments Hackney Ltd v GrantCheryl Investments Ltd v SaldanhaGurton v ParrottLewis v Weldcrest LtdPulleng v CurranTan v SitkowskiWagle v Trustees of Henry Smith’s Charity Kensington EstateWright v MortimerRent Act tenancies :common law, termination ofIntroductionRent Act tenancies :company letsCompany letsEaton Square Properties Ltd v O’HigginsEstavest Investments Ltd v Commercial Express Travel LtdRent Act tenancies :definitionIntroductionRent Act tenancies :employeesLicences – occupation granted to employeesFormer employeesRent Act tenancies :fair rent, determination ofRent regulation (Rent Act 1977 tenants)Rent Act tenancies :grounds for possessionIntroductionRent Act tenancies :holiday letsHoliday lets (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 9 and Rent Act 1977 s9)Buchmann v MayKillick v RobertsR v Rent Officer for Camden LBC ex p PlantMcHale v DanehamRent Act tenancies :incidental, where business merelyWright v MortimerRent Act tenancies :landlords or members of family, premises requiredOwner-occupiersPremises required for landlord or member of family (Rent Act 1977 Sch 15 Case 9)Alexander v MohamadzadehAmaddio v DaltonBaker v MacIverBassett v FraserBostock v Tacher de la PagerieCoombes v ParryEvans v EngelsonGhelani v BowieHodges v BleeKidder v BirchManaton v EdwardsMansukhani v SharkeyRent Act tenancies :licencesLicences – occupation granted to employeesRent Act tenancies :new tenancies remain protectedKotecha v RimingtonRent Act tenancies :nuisance and annoyanceAnti-social behaviourAbrahams v WilsonCobstone Investments Ltd v MaximFrederick Platts Co Ltd v GrigorRent Act tenancies :overcrowdingOvercrowdingRent Act tenancies :owner-occupiers and grounds for possessionOwner-occupiersPremises required for landlord or member of family (Rent Act 1977 Sch 15 Case 9)Alexander v MohamadzadehAmaddio v DaltonBaker v MacIverBassett v FraserBostock v Tacher de la PagerieCoombes v ParryEvans v EngelsonGhelani v BowieHodges v BleeKidder v BirchManaton v EdwardsMansukhani v SharkeyRent Act tenancies :possession ordersIntroduction and general considerationsSuspension of warrants before executionSetting aside warrants after executionRent Act tenancies :prior to Housing Act 1988, tenant not protectedSecretarial Nominee Co Ltd v ThomasRent Act tenancies :reason for occupying premises, business notWright v MortimerRent Act tenancies :rent arrearsRent arrearsBird v HildageDellenty v PellowShaw v GroomRent Act tenancies :residence, occupation asOccupation as a residence; Rent Act 1977 s2(1)(a)Hampstead Way Investments Ltd v Lewis-WeareBevington v CrawfordBlanway Investments Ltd v LynchBrickfield Properties Ltd v HughesBrown v BrashCarphone Warehouse UK Ltd v MalekoutGofor Investments v RobertsHall v KingMoreland Properties (UK) Ltd v DhokiaPrince v RobinsonRegalian Securities Ltd v ScheuerRichards v GreenStephens v KerrTickner v HearnWigley v LeighRent Act tenancies :resident landlordsResident landlords (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 10 and Rent Act 1977 s12)Bardrick v HaycockBarnes v GoresuchCooper v TaitGriffiths v EnglishJackson v PekicLewis-Graham v ConacherO’Sullivan v BarnettPalmer v McNamaraWolff v WaddingtonRent Act tenancies :same or substantially the same premisesRajah v Arogol Co LtdGoringe v Twinsectra LtdRent Act tenancies :security of tenure:board and attendanceBoard and attendanceOtter v NormanNelson Developments Ltd v TaboadaRita Dale v Adrahill LtdRent Act tenancies :security of tenure:business tenanciesBusiness tenancies (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 11, Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 4 and Rent Act 1977 s24)Broadway Investments Hackney Ltd v GrantCheryl Investments Ltd v SaldanhaGurton v ParrottLewis v Weldcrest LtdPulleng v CurranTan v SitkowskiWagle v Trustees of Henry Smith’s Charity Kensington EstateWright v MortimerRent Act tenancies :security of tenure:definitionIntroductionRent Act tenancies :security of tenure:exceptionsIntroductionBusiness tenancies (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 11, Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 4 and Rent Act 1977 s24)Broadway Investments Hackney Ltd v GrantCheryl Investments Ltd v SaldanhaGurton v ParrottLewis v Weldcrest LtdPulleng v CurranTan v SitkowskiWagle v Trustees of Henry Smith’s Charity Kensington EstateWright v MortimerHoliday lets (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 9 and Rent Act 1977 s9)Buchmann v MayKillick v RobertsR v Rent Officer for Camden LBC ex p PlantMcHale v DanehamResident landlords (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 10 and Rent Act 1977 s12)Bardrick v HaycockBarnes v GoresuchCooper v TaitGriffiths v EnglishRent Act tenancies :security of tenure:holiday letsHoliday lets (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 9 and Rent Act 1977 s9)Buchmann v MayKillick v RobertsR v Rent Officer for Camden LBC ex p PlantMcHale v DanehamRent Act tenancies :security of tenure:residence, occupation asOccupation as a residence; Rent Act 1977 s2(1)(a)Hampstead Way Investments Ltd v Lewis-WeareBevington v CrawfordBlanway Investments Ltd v LynchBrickfield Properties Ltd v HughesBrown v BrashCarphone Warehouse UK Ltd v MalekoutGofor Investments v RobertsHall v KingMoreland Properties (UK) Ltd v DhokiaPrince v RobinsonRegalian Securities Ltd v ScheuerRichards v GreenStephens v KerrTickner v HearnWigley v LeighRent Act tenancies :security of tenure:resident landlordsResident landlords (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 10 and Rent Act 1977 s12)Bardrick v HaycockBarnes v GoresuchCooper v TaitGriffiths v EnglishJackson v PekicLewis-Graham v ConacherO’Sullivan v BarnettPalmer v McNamaraWolff v WaddingtonRent Act tenancies :security of tenure:separate dwelling, let as aLet as a separate dwellingGoodrich v PaisnerUratemp Ventures Ltd v CollinsWestminster CC v ClarkeGray v BrownGrosvenor Estates Belgravia v CochranHorford Investments v LambertKavanagh v LyroudiasMansfield DC v LangridgeMiller v EyoMortgage Corporation v UbahParkins v Westminster CCSt Catherine’s College v DorlingTyler v Kensington and Chelsea RLBCR v Rent Officer of Nottinghamshire Registration Area ex p AllenAndrews v BrewerTomkins v Basildon DCWebb v Barnet LBCRent Act tenancies :security of tenure:successionSuccession to Rent Act tenanciesCarega Properties SA v SharrattFitzpatrick v Sterling Housing AssociationGhaidan v Godin-MendozaBrock v WollamsChios Investment Property Co v LopezClore v MacNicolDaejan Properties Ltd v MahoneyHedgedale Ltd v HardsHildebrand v MoonSefton Holdings Ltd v CairnsSwanbrae Ltd v ElliottTennant v HuttonPortman Registrars v Mohammed LatifRent Act tenancies :separate dwelling, let as aLet as a separate dwellingGoodrich v PaisnerUratemp Ventures Ltd v CollinsWestminster CC v ClarkeGray v BrownGrosvenor Estates Belgravia v CochranHorford Investments v LambertKavanagh v LyroudiasMansfield DC v LangridgeMiller v EyoMortgage Corporation v UbahParkins v Westminster CCSt Catherine’s College v DorlingTyler v Kensington and Chelsea RLBCR v Rent Officer of Nottinghamshire Registration Area ex p AllenAndrews v BrewerTomkins v Basildon DCWebb v Barnet LBCRent Act tenancies :shops, protection of tenants aboveWellcome Trust v HamadRent Act tenancies :subtenanciesWellcome Trust v HamadRent Act tenancies :successionSuccession to Rent Act tenanciesCarega Properties SA v SharrattFitzpatrick v Sterling Housing AssociationGhaidan v Godin-MendozaBrock v WollamsChios Investment Property Co v LopezClore v MacNicolDaejan Properties Ltd v MahoneyHedgedale Ltd v HardsHildebrand v MoonSefton Holdings Ltd v CairnsSwanbrae Ltd v ElliottTennant v HuttonPortman Registrars v Mohammed LatifRent Act tenancies :suitable alternative accommodationSuitable alternative accommodationRent Act tenancies :surrenderTruro Diocesan Board of Finance Ltd v FoleyRent Act tenancies :suspension of warrants before executionSuspension of warrants before executionRent Act tenancies :termination at common lawIntroductionrent arrears, payment of arrears:payments into court reducing arrears to below 2 monthsEtherington v Burtrent arrears, payment of arrears:permanent accommodation, policy not to move people with rent arrears toR v Newham LBC ex p Miah (Askir)rent arrears, payment of arrears:persistent delayRent arrearsrent arrears, payment of arrears:pleaded, matters notLaimond Properties Ltd v Raeuchlerent arrears, payment of arrears:possession claims, counterclaims inTelevantos v McCullochrent arrears, payment of arrears:possession orders:55 years to pay of arrears, where it would takeTaj v Ali (No 1)rent arrears, payment of arrears:possession orders:conduct of tenants, reasonableness ofSopwith v Stutchburyrent arrears, payment of arrears:possession orders:everyday practice, suspension asHayman v Rowlandsrent arrears, payment of arrears:possession orders:homelessnessGreen and Coyne v Croydon LBCrent arrears, payment of arrears:possession orders:lay representation on rent arrears possession casesHackney LBC v Springrent arrears, payment of arrears:possession orders:low arrearsSopwith v Stutchburyrent arrears, payment of arrears:possession orders:obvious orders to make, suspended orders asLambeth LBC v Henryrent arrears, payment of arrears:possession orders:paymentDellenty v PellowMerton LBC v Hashmirent arrears, payment of arrears:possession orders:postponement of ordersManchester CC v Finnrent arrears, payment of arrears:possession orders:prima facie meaning, court should not go behindCapital Prime Plus plc v Willsrent arrears, payment of arrears:possession orders:reasonablenessRent arrearsBrent LBC v MarksBurgoyne v GriffithsHaringey LBC v StewartHayman v RowlandsLaimond Properties Ltd v RaeuchleLambeth LBC v HenryLambeth LBC v ThomasLee-Steere v JenningsSecond WRVS Housing Society v BlairSopwith v StutchburyTaj v Ali (No 1)Woodspring DC v Taylorrent arrears, payment of arrears:possession orders:setting aside ordersBrent LBC v MarksSecond WRVS Housing Society v Blairrent arrears, payment of arrears:possession orders:setting aside warrantsMerton LBC v HashmiLambeth LBC v HughesSaint v Barking and Dagenham LBCrent arrears, payment of arrears:possession orders:suspensionHayman v RowlandsLambeth LBC v HenryTaj v Ali (No 1)Vandermolen v TomaStonebridge HAT v Gabbidonrent arrears, payment of arrears:possession orders:water chargesLambeth LBC v Thomasrent arrears, payment of arrears:possession proceedings, adjournment ofR v A Circuit Judge (sitting at Norwich County Court) ex p Wathenrent arrears, payment of arrears:postponement of ordersManchester CC v Finnrent arrears, payment of arrears:preferencesR v Wolverhampton MBC ex p Wattersrent arrears, payment of arrears:public authorities, housing associations asR (Weaver) v London & Quadrant Housing Trustrent arrears, payment of arrears:quarterly payments due to social security systemBrent LBC v Marksrent arrears, payment of arrears:quarterly payments of arrears due to social security systemBrent LBC v Marksrent arrears, payment of arrears:reasonable preference, definition ofR v Wolverhampton MBC ex p Wattersrent arrears, payment of arrears:reasonablenessDellenty v PellowBrent LBC v MarksHaringey LBC v StewartLaimond Properties Ltd v RaeuchleWoodspring DC v Taylorrent arrears, payment of arrears:reasonableness of possession ordersDellenty v PellowRent arrearsBrent LBC v MarksBurgoyne v GriffithsHaringey LBC v StewartHayman v RowlandsLaimond Properties Ltd v RaeuchleLambeth LBC v HenryLambeth LBC v ThomasLee-Steere v JenningsSecond WRVS Housing Society v BlairSopwith v StutchburyTaj v Ali (No 1)Woodspring DC v Taylorrent arrears, payment of arrears:reasonableness of possession orders:counterclaims, failure ofHaringey LBC v Stewartrent arrears, payment of arrears:reasonableness of possession orders:judges must apply mind to reasonablenessBurgoyne v Griffithsrent arrears, payment of arrears:reasonableness of possession orders:payment of arrearsDellenty v PellowBrent LBC v MarksHaringey LBC v StewartLaimond Properties Ltd v RaeuchleWoodspring DC v Taylorrent arrears, payment of arrears:reasons for non-payment, consideration ofR v Wandsworth LBC ex p HawthorneR v Wyre BC ex p Joycerent arrears, payment of arrears:relief from forfeitureArtesian Residential Investments Ltd v Beckrent arrears, payment of arrears:Rent Act tenanciesRent arrearsBird v HildageDellenty v PellowShaw v Groomrent arrears, payment of arrears:rent books, failure to provideShaw v Groomrent arrears, payment of arrears:return rent, waiver of forfeiture where landlord does notThomas v Ken Thomas Ltdrent arrears, payment of arrears:rigid policyR v Lambeth LBC ex p Njomorent arrears, payment of arrears:saleNational and Provincial Building Society v Lloydrent arrears, payment of arrears:section 8 notices, service ofRent arrearsrent arrears, payment of arrears:section 146 notices, right to forfeit not waived byChurch Commissioners for England v Nodjoumirent arrears, payment of arrears:secure tenanciesRent arrears (Housing Act 1985 Sch 2 Ground 1)Notting Hill Housing Trust v JonesLewisham LBC v Simba-Tolarent arrears, payment of arrears:setting aside ordersBrent LBC v Marksrent arrears, payment of arrears:setting aside possession ordersBrent LBC v MarksSecond WRVS Housing Society v Blairrent arrears, payment of arrears:setting aside warrantsMerton LBC v Hashmirent arrears, payment of arrears:settled accommodation and intentional homelessnessBratton v Croydon LBCrent arrears, payment of arrears:social security benefits position, ascertaining theSecond WRVS Housing Society v Blairrent arrears, payment of arrears:successionMuscat v Smithrent arrears, payment of arrears:surrenderChamberlain v ScalleyMattey Securities Ltd v ErvinPreston BC v Faircloughrent arrears, payment of arrears:suspension from biddingR (Babakandi) v Westminster CCrent arrears, payment of arrears:suspension of possession ordersHayman v RowlandsLambeth LBC v HenryTaj v Ali (No 1)Vandermolen v Tomarent arrears, payment of arrears:suspension of warrants before executionStonebridge HAT v Gabbidonrent arrears, payment of arrears:tenderBessa Plus v Lancasterrent arrears, payment of arrears:tendered, rent not lawfully due ifBird v Hildagerent arrears, payment of arrears:third parties, tender of rent fromBessa Plus v Lancasterrent arrears, payment of arrears:waiver of breach, payment operating asThomas v Ken Thomas Ltdrent arrears, payment of arrears:water rates and other chargesLewisham LBC v Simba-TolaLambeth LBC v Thomasrent arrears :8 weeks or 2 months arrearsRent arrearsEtherington v Burtrent arrears :55 years to pay of arrears, where it would takeTaj v Ali (No 1)rent arrears :acquiescence and intentional homelessnessR v Nottingham CC ex p Cainerent arrears :adjournmentsNorth British Housing Association Limited v MatthewsMilecastle Housing Ltd v WaltonLee-Steere v Jenningsrent arrears :admissionsBaygreen Properties Ltd v Gilrent arrears :affordabilityR v Brent LBC ex p BaruwaR v Wandsworth LBC ex p Hawthornerent arrears :agents, tender byBessa Plus v Lancasterrent arrears :agreements to remain after orders not creating new tenanciesLeadenhall Residential 2 Ltd v Stirlingrent arrears :‘all the rent in arrears’, definition ofMaryland Estates v Bar-Josephrent arrears :allocation:preferencesR v Wolverhampton MBC ex p Wattersrent arrears :allocation:reasonable preferenceR v Wolverhampton MBC ex p Wattersrent arrears :allocation:rigid policyR v Lambeth LBC ex p Njomorent arrears :allocation:suspension from biddingR (Babakandi) v Westminster CCrent arrears :appealsLee-Steere v Jenningsrent arrears :assignmentChurch Commissioners for England v NodjoumiNotting Hill Housing Trust v Jonesrent arrears :assured shorthold tenanciesRent arrearsrent arrears :assured tenanciesRent arrears (Housing Act 1988 Sch 2 Grounds 8, 10 and 11)Artesian Residential Investments Ltd v BeckBaygreen Properties Ltd v GilBessa Plus v LancasterCapital Prime Plus plc v WillsDay v ColtraneLeadenhall Residential 2 Ltd v StirlingNorth British Housing Association Limited v MatthewsR (Weaver) v London & Quadrant Housing TrustDiab v Countrywide Rentals 1 plcEtherington v BurtMilecastle Housing Ltd v Waltonrent arrears :causationBratton v Croydon LBCrent arrears :cheques as conditional paymentsDay v Coltranerent arrears :conduct of tenants, reasonableness ofSopwith v Stutchburyrent arrears :continuing liability for rent, as includingMaryland Estates v Bar-Josephrent arrears :counterclaimsEtherington v BurtHaringey LBC v StewartTelevantos v McCullochrent arrears :date of hearingsRent arrearsrent arrears :definition of rentLewisham LBC v Simba-Tolarent arrears :deliberate failure to pay rentR v Brent LBC ex p Baruwarent arrears :demands for rent not waiving right to forfeitVan Haarlam v Kasner Charitable Trustrent arrears :direct payments, possibility ofSecond WRVS Housing Society v Blairrent arrears :discretionary groundsRent arrearsRent arrears (Housing Act 1988 Sch 2 Grounds 8, 10 and 11)Artesian Residential Investments Ltd v BeckBaygreen Properties Ltd v GilBessa Plus v LancasterCapital Prime Plus plc v WillsDay v ColtraneLeadenhall Residential 2 Ltd v StirlingNorth British Housing Association Limited v MatthewsR (Weaver) v London & Quadrant Housing TrustDiab v Countrywide Rentals 1 plcEtherington v BurtMilecastle Housing Ltd v Waltonrent arrears :establishment of grounds, need forBaygreen Properties Ltd v Gilrent arrears :everyday practice, suspension of possession orders asHayman v Rowlandsrent arrears :exceptional circumstances for adjournments to allow paymentNorth British Housing Association Limited v Matthewsrent arrears :face of orders, mandatory grounds must be stated onDiab v Countrywide Rentals 1 plcrent arrears :forfeitureMaryland Estates v Bar-Josephrent arrears :forfeiture:‘all the rent in arrears’, definition ofMaryland Estates v Bar-Josephrent arrears :forfeiture:assignment, section 146 notice onChurch Commissioners for England v Nodjoumirent arrears :forfeiture:continuing liability, includingMaryland Estates v Bar-Josephrent arrears :forfeiture:demands for rent not waiving right to forfeitVan Haarlam v Kasner Charitable Trustrent arrears :forfeiture:return rent, waiver where landlord does notThomas v Ken Thomas Ltdrent arrears :forfeiture:section 146 notices, right to forfeit not waived byChurch Commissioners for England v Nodjoumirent arrears :forfeiture:waiver of breach, payment operating asThomas v Ken Thomas Ltdrent arrears :full payment of arrears, insistence ofLambeth LBC v Hughesrent arrears :further evidenceLee-Steere v Jenningsrent arrears :grounds for possessionMarath v MacGillivrayRent arrearsRent arrearsBrent LBC v MarksBurgoyne v GriffithsHaringey LBC v StewartHayman v RowlandsLaimond Properties Ltd v RaeuchleLambeth LBC v HenryLambeth LBC v ThomasLee-Steere v JenningsSecond WRVS Housing Society v BlairSopwith v StutchburyTaj v Ali (No 1)Woodspring DC v Taylorrent arrears :homelessnessBratton v Croydon LBCGreen and Coyne v Croydon LBCR v Wyre BC ex p JoyceR v Newham LBC ex p Miah (Askir)rent arrears :Housing Act 1988Rent arrearsRent arrears (Housing Act 1985 Sch 2 Ground 1)Notting Hill Housing Trust v JonesLewisham LBC v Simba-TolaRent arrears (Housing Act 1988 Sch 2 Grounds 8, 10 and 11)Artesian Residential Investments Ltd v BeckBaygreen Properties Ltd v GilBessa Plus v LancasterCapital Prime Plus plc v WillsDay v ColtraneLeadenhall Residential 2 Ltd v StirlingNorth British Housing Association Limited v MatthewsR (Weaver) v London & Quadrant Housing TrustDiab v Countrywide Rentals 1 plcEtherington v BurtMilecastle Housing Ltd v WaltonBird v HildageDellenty v PellowShaw v GroomRent arrearsBrent LBC v MarksBurgoyne v GriffithsHaringey LBC v StewartHayman v RowlandsLaimond Properties Ltd v RaeuchleLambeth LBC v HenryLambeth LBC v ThomasLee-Steere v JenningsSecond WRVS Housing Society v BlairSopwith v StutchburyTaj v Ali (No 1)Woodspring DC v Taylorrent arrears :housing associations acting as public authoritiesR (Weaver) v London & Quadrant Housing Trustrent arrears :jurisdictionRent arrearsBaygreen Properties Ltd v GilBird v Hildagerent arrears :lay representation on rent arrears possession casesHackney LBC v Springrent arrears :leave premises owing rent, where tenantsPreston BC v Faircloughrent arrears :long absences with large arrearsChamberlain v Scalleyrent arrears :low arrears, reasonableness of possession orders whereSopwith v Stutchburyrent arrears :mandatory groundsRent arrearsDiab v Countrywide Rentals 1 plcrent arrears :no arrangements for payment, where there areHaringey LBC v Stewartrent arrears :non-tenants, payment of rent byMattey Securities Ltd v Ervinrent arrears :notice seeking possessionTorridge DC v JonesMarath v MacGillivrayrent arrears :obvious orders to make, suspended possession orders asLambeth LBC v Henryrent arrears :offers to payLaimond Properties Ltd v Raeuchlerent arrears :oppressionLambeth LBC v Hughesrent arrears :owner-occupiers, returningBoyle v Verrallrent arrears :payment of arrearsLambeth LBC v HughesSaint v Barking and Dagenham LBCrent arrears :payment of arrears:no arrangements for payment, where there areHaringey LBC v Stewartrent arrears :payment of arrears:offers to payLaimond Properties Ltd v Raeuchlerent books :assured shorthold tenanciesAndrews v Cunninghamrent books :assured tenancies, use of wordsAndrews v Cunninghamrent books :creation of tenanciesWestminster CC v Bassonrent books :errorsWestminster CC v Bassonrent books :failure to supply rent booksShaw v Groomrent books :subletting whole of premisesRC Glaze Properties Ltd v Alabdinbonirent regulation :assured shorthold tenanciesPark Lane Properties Ltd v Northern Rent Assessment Committeerent regulation :assured tenantsRent regulation (assured tenants)Riverside Housing Association Ltd v WhiteBankway Properties v DunsfordContour Homes Ltd v RowenHughes v Borodex LtdR (Lester) v London Rent Assessment CommitteeR (Morris) v London Rent Assessment CommitteeTadema Holdings v FergusonEarl of Cadogan v ChehabGhani v London Rent Assessment CommitteeLondon District Properties Management Ltd v GoolamyN & D (London) Ltd v GadsonR v London Rent Assessment Panel ex p Cadogan EstatesR (Innes) v Northern Rent Assessment PanelRowe v South West Rent Assessment Panelrent regulation :avoidance of statutory schemeBankway Properties v Dunsfordrent regulation :comparablesR (Innes) v Northern Rent Assessment Panelrent regulation :delivery of noticesTadema Holdings v Fergusonrent regulation :enforcementBankway Properties v Dunsfordrent regulation :estoppelContour Homes Ltd v Rowenrent regulation :excess of limit, rent assessed inR (Morris) v London Rent Assessment Committeerent regulation :fair rents, determination ofRent regulation (Rent Act 1977 tenants)rent regulation :improvements by tenants, assessment ofRowe v South West Rent Assessment Panelrent regulation :increasesRiverside Housing Association Ltd v WhiteBankway Properties v DunsfordContour Homes Ltd v RowenLondon District Properties Management Ltd v Goolamyrent regulation :initial rent, fixing ofHughes v Borodex Ltdrent regulation :interpretation in contextRiverside Housing Association Ltd v Whiterent regulation :material submitted after hearings, no reliance onEarl of Cadogan v Chehabrent regulation :new rent, starting procedure for fixingHughes v Borodex Ltdrent regulation :notice:delivery, service connotingTadema Holdings v Fergusonrent regulation :notice:increasesRiverside Housing Association Ltd v WhiteLondon District Properties Management Ltd v Goolamyrent regulation :notice:not addressed to tenantsR (Morris) v London Rent Assessment Committeerent regulation :notice:older versionsTadema Holdings v Fergusonrent regulation :notice:prescribed notice, substantially to the like effect asR (Morris) v London Rent Assessment CommitteeTadema Holdings v Fergusonrent regulation :notice:voidRiverside Housing Association Ltd v Whiterent regulation :personal experience, use ofR (Innes) v Northern Rent Assessment Panelrent regulation :prescribed notice, substantially to the like effect asR (Morris) v London Rent Assessment CommitteeTadema Holdings v Fergusonrent regulation :procedure for fixing new rent, startingHughes v Borodex Ltdrent regulation :quantitative approachGhani v London Rent Assessment Committeerent regulation :reasons, adequacy ofGhani v London Rent Assessment Committeerent regulation :referrals must be received by rent assessment committeesR (Lester) v London Rent Assessment Committeerent regulation :rent assessment committeesRent regulation (assured tenants)R (Lester) v London Rent Assessment CommitteeR (Morris) v London Rent Assessment CommitteeEarl of Cadogan v ChehabGhani v London Rent Assessment CommitteePark Lane Properties Ltd v Northern Rent Assessment CommitteeR v London Rent Assessment Panel ex p Cadogan EstatesR (Innes) v Northern Rent Assessment Panelrent regulation :rent review clausesBankway Properties v DunsfordContour Homes Ltd v Rowenrent regulation :rent to be determined, definition ofRent regulation (assured tenants)rent regulation :service of noticesTadema Holdings v Fergusonrent regulation :successionN & D (London) Ltd v Gadsonrent regulation :value due to current and former tenants, disregard of reduction inN & D (London) Ltd v Gadsonrent regulation :void notices of increasesRiverside Housing Association Ltd v Whiterepairing covenants:access/entry to premisesYeomans Row Management Ltd v Bodentien-Meyrickrepairing covenants:age of premisesMcClean v Liverpool CCNewham LBC v Patelrepairing covenants:block of flatsAdami v Lincoln Grange Management Ltdrepairing covenants:business efficacyImplied covenantsrepairing covenants:character of premisesMcClean v Liverpool CCNewham LBC v Patelrepairing covenants:condensationQuick v Taff-Ely BCStaves v Leeds CCrepairing covenants:construction of covenantsHolding and Barnes plc v Hill House HammondPetersson v Pitt Place (Epsom) Ltdrepairing covenants:contractors, appointment ofLong v Southwark LBCrepairing covenants:correlative obligations on tenants, no implied covenant on landlords where noDemetriou v Poolaction Ltdrepairing covenants:counterclaimsIslington LBC v Keanerepairing covenants:damp-proof coursesEyre v McCrackenWainwright v Leeds CCrepairing covenants:dampness:exteriorBall and Ball v Plymouth CCSouthwark LBC v McIntoshrepairing covenants:dampness:structureBall and Ball v Plymouth CCSouthwark LBC v McIntoshrepairing covenants:demolished, age and character of premises such that it should beNewham LBC v Patelrepairing covenants:design defectsStent v Monmouth DCrepairing covenants:doors, replacement ofStent v Monmouth DCrepairing covenants:estoppelBrikom Investments Ltd v Seafordrepairing covenants:express covenantsLiability in contractrepairing covenants:exteriorDouglas-Scott v ScorgieHopwood v Cannock Chase DC (formerly Rugeley UDC)Quick v Taff-Ely BCBall and Ball v Plymouth CCSouthwark LBC v McIntoshBarrett v Lounova (1982) Ltdrepairing covenants:false wallsFincar SRL v 109/113 Mount Street Management Co Ltdrepairing covenants:fitness of premises, implied warranties as toSouthwark LBC v Mills; Southwark LBC v Tanner; Baxter v Camden LBCrepairing covenants:floorsFincar SRL v 109/113 Mount Street Management Co LtdWindever v Liverpool CCrepairing covenants:good condition, covenants to keep premises inWelsh v Greenwich LBCLee v Leeds CCrepairing covenants:good working order, meaning ofVeolia Water Central Ltd v London Fire & Emergency Planning Authorityrepairing covenants:heating systemsCreska Ltd v Hammersmith and Fulham LBCrepairing covenants:Human Rights Act 1998Lee v Leeds CCrepairing covenants:implied covenantsLiability in contractImplied covenantsLiverpool CC v IrwinSouthwark LBC v Mills; Southwark LBC v Tanner; Baxter v Camden LBCAdami v Lincoln Grange Management LtdBarrett v Lounova (1982) LtdDemetriou v Poolaction LtdGordon and Texeira v Selico Ltd and Select Managements LtdKing v South Northamptonshire DCLee v Leeds CCrepairing covenants:improvementsEyre v McCrackenMcDougall v Easington DCrepairing covenants:inherent defectsStent v Monmouth DCrepairing covenants:intentionImplied covenantsrepairing covenants:interiorBarrett v Lounova (1982) Ltdrepairing covenants:lagging pipesWycombe Area Health Authority v Barnettrepairing covenants:Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 section 11Islington LBC v KeaneBrunskill v MulcahyDame Margaret Hungerford Charity Trustees v BeazeleyMcDougall v Easington DCMurray v Birmingham CCStent v Monmouth DCWainwright v Leeds CCKumarasamy v EdwardsCampden Hill Towers Ltd v GardnerDouglas-Scott v ScorgieHopwood v Cannock Chase DC (formerly Rugeley UDC)Grand v GillQuick v Taff-Ely BCStaves v Leeds CCBall and Ball v Plymouth CCSouthwark LBC v McIntoshChurchill v Nottingham CCO’Connor v Old Etonians Housing Association LtdBradley v Chorley BCBrikom Investments Ltd v SeafordMcClean v Liverpool CCNewham LBC v PatelNiazi Services Ltd v Van der LooWycombe Area Health Authority v BarnettWindever v Liverpool CCrepairing covenants:make good after repairs, landlords required toBradley v Chorley BCrepairing covenants:moss on stepsBrunskill v Mulcahyrepairing covenants:patch repairs to roofDame Margaret Hungerford Charity Trustees v BeazeleyMurray v Birmingham CCrepairing covenants:pathsKing v South Northamptonshire DCrepairing covenants:physical damage to structure or exteriorSouthwark LBC v McIntoshrepairing covenants:pipes, laggingWycombe Area Health Authority v Barnettrepairing covenants:plasterGrand v GillStaves v Leeds CCrepairing covenants:possession claimsIslington LBC v Keanerepairing covenants:proper working orderO’Connor v Old Etonians Housing Association LtdVeolia Water Central Ltd v London Fire & Emergency Planning Authorityrepairing covenants:quiet enjoyment, covenant forSouthwark LBC v Mills; Southwark LBC v Tanner; Baxter v Camden LBCrepairing covenants:rear paths, implied term to maintainKing v South Northamptonshire DCrepairing covenants:reasonable bystander testImplied covenantsrepairing covenants:redecoration after repairsMcDougall v Easington DCBradley v Chorley BCrepairing covenants:rendering parts of wallsFincar SRL v 109/113 Mount Street Management Co Ltdrepairing covenants:rent, registeredBrikom Investments Ltd v Seafordrepairing covenants:roofsDame Margaret Hungerford Charity Trustees v BeazeleyMurray v Birmingham CCDouglas-Scott v ScorgieIbrahim v Dovecorn Reversions Ltdrepairing covenants:soundproofingSouthwark LBC v Mills; Southwark LBC v Tanner; Baxter v Camden LBCrepairing covenants:structure:block of flatsAdami v Lincoln Grange Management Ltdrepairing covenants:structure:condensationQuick v Taff-Ely BCrepairing covenants:structure:dampnessBall and Ball v Plymouth CCSouthwark LBC v McIntoshrepairing covenants:structure:floor joistsFincar SRL v 109/113 Mount Street Management Co Ltdrepairing covenants:structure:main structureIbrahim v Dovecorn Reversions Ltdrepairing covenants:structure:outside wallsCampden Hill Towers Ltd v Gardnerrepairing covenants:structure:ownership of landlords, not limited to items inMarlborough Park Services Ltd v Rowe and anotherrepairing covenants:structure:physical damageSouthwark LBC v McIntoshrepairing covenants:structure:plasterGrand v Gillrepairing covenants:structure:roof terraces of flatsIbrahim v Dovecorn Reversions Ltdrepairing covenants:structure:roofsDouglas-Scott v ScorgieIbrahim v Dovecorn Reversions Ltdrepairing covenants:structure:subsidenceSmedley v Chumley and Hawkes Ltdrepairing covenants:structure:surfacesHallisey v Petmoor Developments LtdIbrahim v Dovecorn Reversions Ltdrepairing covenants:structure:wallsSmedley v Chumley and Hawkes LtdCampden Hill Towers Ltd v GardnerFincar SRL v 109/113 Mount Street Management Co LtdHallisey v Petmoor Developments Ltdrepairing covenants:subsidenceSmedley v Chumley and Hawkes Ltdrepairing covenants:surfacesHallisey v Petmoor Developments LtdIbrahim v Dovecorn Reversions Ltdrepairing covenants:time limits for counterclaimsIslington LBC v Keanerepairing covenants:wallsSmedley v Chumley and Hawkes LtdCampden Hill Towers Ltd v GardnerFincar SRL v 109/113 Mount Street Management Co LtdHallisey v Petmoor Developments Ltdrepairing covenants:washers, replacement ofIslington LBC v Keanerepairing covenants:water, tenant’s failure to turn offWycombe Area Health Authority v Barnettrepairing covenants:water pressure due to works in other parts of buildingNiazi Services Ltd v Van der Loorepairing covenants:yards as exteriorHopwood v Cannock Chase DC (formerly Rugeley UDC)repeat/fresh homelessness applicationsRepeat/fresh applicationsR v Harrow LBC ex p FahiaTower Hamlets LBC v Begum (Rikha)G v Haringey LBCR (Griffin) v Southwark LBCAli v Camden LBCrepeat/fresh homelessness applications:carers, need forAli v Camden LBCrepeat/fresh homelessness applications:disability living allowanceAli v Camden LBCrepeat/fresh homelessness applications:exactly the same facts testRepeat/fresh applicationsR v Harrow LBC ex p FahiaR (Griffin) v Southwark LBCrepeat/fresh homelessness applications:experts, new material fromG v Haringey LBCrepeat/fresh homelessness applications:material changes of circumstances testRepeat/fresh applicationsTower Hamlets LBC v Begum (Rikha)Ali v Camden LBCrepeat/fresh homelessness applications:separation from partnersR (Griffin) v Southwark LBCrepresentationRepresentationHackney LBC v Springrepresentation:lay representation on rent arrears possession casesHackney LBC v Springrepresentation:legal representationBates v Croydon LBCVerrilli v IdigorasBarrett v Southwark LBCrepresentation:solicitors, problems findingBarrett v Southwark LBCrepresentations, making:face to face meetings, right toMakisi v Birmingham CC; Yosief v Birmingham CC; Nagi v Birmingham CCrepresentations, making:homelessness reviewsLambeth LBC v JohnstonMakisi v Birmingham CC; Yosief v Birmingham CC; Nagi v Birmingham CCrepresentations, making:opportunity to makeLambeth LBC v Johnstonrepresentations, making:possession proceedingsIntroductionrepresentations, making:telephone, byMakisi v Birmingham CC; Yosief v Birmingham CC; Nagi v Birmingham CCrepudiatory breachHussein v MehlmanrescissionKillick v RobertsR v Southwark LBC ex p Dagouresidence test:assignmentCamden LBC v Goldenbergresidence test:hospital, absence inHedgedale Ltd v Hardsresidence test:intentionCamden LBC v Goldenbergresidence test:Rent Act tenanciesJackson v Pekicresidence test:residing with, definition ofIslington LBC v Freemanresidence test:subtenanciesCrawley BC v SawyerGay v SheeranNotting Hill Housing Trust v Etoriaresidence test:successionIslington LBC v FreemanSheffield CC v WallHedgedale Ltd v Hardsresidence test:temporary absencesSheffield CC v Wallresident landlords:common rooms, use ofGoodrich v Paisnerresident landlords:conversion works as being of a sufficient degree to render flats purpose builtBarnes v Goresuchresident landlords:intentionO’Sullivan v Barnettresident landlords:new buildings, landlord and tenant moving toO’Sullivan v Barnettresident landlords:one joint landlord, resident byCooper v Taitresident landlords:Protection from Eviction Act 1977Sumeghova v McMahonresident landlords:purpose built, sufficient degree to render flatsBarnes v Goresuchresident landlords:reservation of right for landlords to live on premises, clear words needed forGray v BrownMiller v Eyoresident landlords:residence testJackson v Pekicresident landlords:security of tenureResident landlords (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 10 and Rent Act 1977 s12)Bardrick v HaycockBarnes v GoresuchCooper v TaitGriffiths v EnglishJackson v PekicLewis-Graham v ConacherO’Sullivan v BarnettPalmer v McNamaraWolff v Waddingtonresident landlords:separate dwelling, let as aGoodrich v PaisnerGray v BrownMiller v EyoMortgage Corporation v Ubahresident landlords:separate extensions, landlords living inBardrick v HaycockGriffiths v Englishresident landlords:sleep on premises, where landlord does notPalmer v McNamararesident landlords:temporary sharingSumeghova v McMahonresident landlords:two homes, landlords withWolff v Waddingtonresident permits, refusal ofR (Burns) v Southwark LBCresidential occupier, definition ofHousing Act 1988 ss27 and 28residential tenancy agreements - unfair contract termsBrusse and de Man Garabito v Jahani BVresources:detailed assessmentsBernard v Enfield LBCresources:homelessnessBernard v Enfield LBCR (Conville) v Richmond upon Thames LBCresources:intentional homelessnessR (Conville) v Richmond upon Thames LBCretrospectivityR v Hackney LBC ex p Kreturning owner-occupiersReturning owner-occupier (Housing Act 1988 Sch 2 Ground 1)Boyle v VerrallHegab v ShamashMustafa v Ruddockreturning owner-occupiers:all relevant matters, consideration ofHegab v Shamashreturning owner-occupiers:assured tenanciesReturning owner-occupier (Housing Act 1988 Sch 2 Ground 1)Boyle v VerrallHegab v ShamashMustafa v Ruddockreturning owner-occupiers:dispensing with noticeBoyle v VerrallHegab v Shamashreturning owner-occupiers:exceptional cases for dispensing with noticeBoyle v Verrallreturning owner-occupiers:failure to notify tenantsMustafa v Ruddockreturning owner-occupiers:grounds for possessionReturning owner-occupier (Housing Act 1988 Sch 2 Ground 1)Boyle v VerrallHegab v ShamashMustafa v Ruddockreturning owner-occupiers:notice of possessionBoyle v VerrallMustafa v Ruddockreturning owner-occupiers:reasonablenessBoyle v Verrallreturning owner-occupiers:rent, persistent late payment ofBoyle v Verrallrevival of tenanciesDunn v Bradford MDC; Marston v Leeds CCright to a fair trial:article 6Anderson v UKGorlova v RussiaKletsova v RussiaKunic v CroatiaMalinovskiy v RussiaMirzayev v AzerbaijanPalumbo v ItalyPanteleeva v UkraineTeteriny v RussiaTsfayo v UKVyrovyy v UkraineWaltoś and Pawlicz v Polandright to buy:completion, compellingMuir Group Housing Association Ltd v Thornleyright to buy:employeesEmployees (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 2)right to buy:exceptionsEmployees (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 2)right to buy:extinguishmentBater v Bater; Bater v Greenwich LBCright to buy:left, loss of right when tenantsJennings v Epping Forest DCright to buy:notice to quitBater v Bater; Bater v Greenwich LBCright to buy:security of tenureJennings v Epping Forest DCMuir Group Housing Association Ltd v ThornleySutton LBC v Swannright to buy:subtenanciesJennings v Epping Forest DCMuir Group Housing Association Ltd v ThornleySutton LBC v Swannright to lifeArticle 2: Right to lifeBudayeva v Russiaright to reside :EEA nationalsZambrano v Office National de l’EmploiR (Mohamed) v Harrow LBCright to reside :EU nationalsHarrow LBC v IbrahimLekpo-Bozua v Hackney LBCright to reside :freestanding and unconditional rightHarrow LBC v Ibrahimright to reside :school age, children ofHarrow LBC v IbrahimTeixeira v Lambeth LBCright to respect for private and family life:Article 8Article 8: Right to respect for private and family liferoofs:disrepairDame Margaret Hungerford Charity Trustees v BeazeleyMurray v Birmingham CCDouglas-Scott v ScorgieIbrahim v Dovecorn Reversions LtdLoria v Hammerroofs:exteriorDame Margaret Hungerford Charity Trustees v Beazeleyroofs:new and improved roofsNew England Properties plc v Portsmouth News Shops Ltdroofs:patch repairsDame Margaret Hungerford Charity Trustees v BeazeleyMurray v Birmingham CCroofs:service charges and long leasesNew England Properties plc v Portsmouth News Shops Ltdroofs:structureDouglas-Scott v ScorgieIbrahim v Dovecorn Reversions Ltdroofs:terraces of flatsIbrahim v Dovecorn Reversions Ltdroofs:water tanks, defects inLoria v Hammerrooms:arrangementsBirmingham CC v Oakleyrooms:basementsGrosvenor Estates Belgravia v Cochranrooms:bathrooms, lights inSymons v Warrenrooms:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings underBirmingham CC v Oakleyrooms:exclusive possessionAG Securities v Vaughanrooms:kitchensBirmingham CC v Oakleyrooms:licence/tenancy distinctionAG Securities v Vaughanrooms:separate dwelling, let as aGoodrich v Paisnerrooms:toilets next to kitchensBirmingham CC v Oakleyroots of trees, highway authorities responsible forDelaware Mansions Ltd v City of Westminsterrough sleepingOgle v Bundhoosafety net servicesIntroductionsale of property:best priceBradford and Bingley plc v RossMortgage Express v Mardnersale of property:ceasing to occupy before saleR v Wandsworth LBC ex p Otengsale of property:compensation for former tenantsClements v Simmondssale of property:connected or associated companies, sale toBradford and Bingley plc v RossMortgage Express v Mardnersale of property:early sales, prospects ofTarget Home Loans v Clothiersale of property:financial factors, taking into accountPolonski v Lloyds Bank Mortgages Ltdsale of property:High CourtCheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Krauszsale of property:intention to live in property until saleRowe v TrueloveLipton v Whitworthsale of property:intentional homelessnessR v Wandsworth LBC ex p Otengsale of property:judicial saleZehentner v Austriasale of property:landlords or members of family, premises required forRowe v TrueloveLipton v WhitworthClements v Simmondssale of property:mortgage possession proceedings:best price, attainment ofBradford and Bingley plc v RossMortgage Express v MardnerRaja v Lloyds TSBsale of property:mortgage possession proceedings:connected or associated companies, sale toBradford and Bingley plc v RossMortgage Express v Mardnersale of property:mortgage possession proceedings:early sales, prospects ofTarget Home Loans v Clothiersale of property:mortgage possession proceedings:financial factors, taking into accountPolonski v Lloyds Bank Mortgages Ltdsale of property:mortgage possession proceedings:High CourtCheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Krauszsale of property:mortgage possession proceedings:jurisdictionPalk v Mortgage Services Fundingsale of property:mortgage possession proceedings:orders for saleBradford and Bingley plc v RossMortgage Express v MardnerPalk v Mortgage Services Fundingsale of property:mortgage possession proceedings:reasonable periodBristol and West Building Society v EllisNational and Provincial Building Society v Lloydsale of property:mortgage possession proceedings:rent arrears, payment ofNational and Provincial Building Society v Lloydsale of property:mortgage possession proceedings:shortfall, leave where sale would leave a mortgageBarrett v Halifax Building Societysale of property:mortgage possession proceedings:social factors, taking into accountPolonski v Lloyds Bank Mortgages Ltdsale of property:mortgage possession proceedings:suspended possession ordersCheltenham and Gloucester plc v BookerTarget Home Loans v ClothierCheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Krauszsale of property:mortgage possession proceedings:who should sell propertyMortgage Service Funding plc v Steelesale of property:new houses abroad, landlords intending to buildBissessar v Ghosnsale of property:orders for saleBradford and Bingley plc v RossMortgage Express v MardnerPalk v Mortgage Services Fundingsale of property:prospective purchasers where no binding contract of saleBretherton v Patonsale of property:reasonable periodBristol and West Building Society v EllisNational and Provincial Building Society v Lloydsale of property:rent arrears, payment ofNational and Provincial Building Society v Lloydsale of property:shortfall, leave where sale would leave a mortgageBarrett v Halifax Building Societysale of property:social factors, taking into accountPolonski v Lloyds Bank Mortgages Ltdsale of property:suspended possession ordersCheltenham and Gloucester plc v BookerTarget Home Loans v ClothierCheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Krauszsale of property:who should sell propertyMortgage Service Funding plc v Steelesame sex partnersSuccession to assured tenanciesSouthern Housing Group Ltd v NuttingFitzpatrick v Sterling Housing AssociationGhaidan v Godin-Mendozascaffolding, erection ofQueensway Marketing Ltd v Associated Restaurants Ltdschool age, children of:EU nationalsHarrow LBC v IbrahimTeixeira v Lambeth LBCschool age, children of:homelessness assistance, eligibility forHarrow LBC v IbrahimTeixeira v Lambeth LBCschool caretakersSurrey CC v Lamondschools, proximity of accommodation to:travel timeWilliams v Birmingham CCScotland:assured tenanciesLaimond Properties Ltd v Al-ShakarchiScotland:change of landlordKnowles Housing Association v MillarScotland:homelessnessR v Kyle and Carrick DC ex p RobsonScotland:landlord conditionKnowles Housing Association v MillarScotland:settled accommodation and intentional homelessnessR v Kyle and Carrick DC ex p RobsonScotland:subtenanciesMcLoughlin’s Curator Bonis v Motherwell DCsecure tenancies:assignmentBurton v Camden LBCCamden LBC v GoldenbergCroydon LBC v Buston and TriancePeabody Donation Fund v HigginsSanctuary Housing Association v Bakersecure tenancies:assured tenanciesAssured tenancy transitional provisionssecure tenancies:breach of obligations as ground for possessionBreach of obligationBreach of obligation (Housing Act 1985 Sch 2 Ground 1)Southwark LBC v O’SullivanCamden LBC v McBrideKensington and Chelsea RLBC v SimmondsNorthampton BC v Lovattsecure tenancies:change of landlordKnowles Housing Association v Millarsecure tenancies:company letsCompany letssecure tenancies:consent ordersR v Worthing BC ex p Brucesecure tenancies:continuation of tenanciesThe effect of possession orders – in generalsecure tenancies:death of tenantsDeath of tenantWandsworth LBC v Randallsecure tenancies:demolition or redevelopment, property required forProperty required for demolition or redevelopmentsecure tenancies:employees, licences forLicences – occupation granted to employeessecure tenancies:false statementsTenancy obtained by false statementLewisham LBC v Adeyemi/Lewisham LBC v AkinsolaNorth Herts DC v CarthyRushcliffe BC v Watsonsecure tenancies:form intention to return, where tenant could notMcLoughlin’s Curator Bonis v Motherwell DCsecure tenancies:former employeesFormer employeessecure tenancies:fully mutual co-operative tenanciesAli Bhai and Cabare v Black Roof CHA Ltdsecure tenancies:grounds for possessionIntroductionsecure tenancies:introductory tenanciesIntroductory tenanciessecure tenancies:landlord conditionAli Bhai and Cabare v Black Roof CHA LtdBanjo v Brent LBCKnowles Housing Association v Millarsecure tenancies:licencesLicences – occupation granted to employeessecure tenancies:local authority functionsAccommodation for Homeless Persons (Housing Act 1985, Sch 1 para 4)secure tenancies:notificationAccommodation for Homeless Persons (Housing Act 1985, Sch 1 para 4)secure tenancies:nuisance and annoyanceAnti-social behaviourAnti-social behaviour (Housing Acts 1985 and 1988)Croydon LBC v CrawfordHarlow DC v SewellKensington Housing Trust v OliverPortsmouth CC v BryantWatford BC v SimpsonSheffield CC v Fletchersecure tenancies:occupation as a residenceOccupation as a residence; Rent Act 1977 s2(1)(a)secure tenancies:overcrowdingOvercrowdingOvercrowding (Rent Act 1977 s101)Henry Smith’s Charity Trustees v Bartosiak-Jentyssecure tenancies:possession ordersIntroduction and general considerationsThe effect of possession orders – in generalSuspension of warrants before executionSetting aside warrants after executionsecure tenancies:rentVariation of non-rent terms (secure tenants)Rents (secure tenants)R v Ealing LBC ex p LewisWandsworth LBC v Winder (No 2)Rent arrears (Housing Act 1985 Sch 2 Ground 1)Notting Hill Housing Trust v JonesLewisham LBC v Simba-Tolasecure tenancies:rent regulationChouhan v The Earl’s High Schoolsecure tenancies:resumption of occupation after lossHussey v Camden LBCsecure tenancies:right to buyJennings v Epping Forest DCMuir Group Housing Association Ltd v ThornleySutton LBC v Swannsecure tenancies:ScotlandKnowles Housing Association v Millarsecure tenancies:subtenanciesHussey v Camden LBCJennings v Epping Forest DCMuir Group Housing Association Ltd v ThornleySutton LBC v SwannMcLoughlin’s Curator Bonis v Motherwell DCSubletting the whole of premisessecure tenancies:successionSuccession to secure tenanciesAustin v Southwark LBCBirmingham CC v WalkerWaltham Forest LBC v ThomasBassetlaw DC v RenshawBrent LBC v FofanaEpping Forest DC v PomphrettIslington LBC v FreemanMarsh v Lewisham LBCMichalak v Wandsworth LBCNewham LBC v PhillipsNewham LBC v RiaPeabody Donation Fund Governors v GrantSheffield CC v WallSheffield CC v Wall (No 2)Westminster CC v PeartSharp v Brent LBCsecure tenancies:succession by minorKingston upon Thames RLBC v Princesecure tenancies:suitable alternative accommodationSuitable alternative accommodationsecure tenancies:utilitiesRochdale BC v Dixonsecure tenancies:variation of agreementRochdale BC v Dixonsecure tenancies:warrants of possessionSuspension of warrants before executionSetting aside warrants after executionsecure tenancies:will, tenancies atBanjo v Brent LBCsecure tenancies and security of tenure:assignmentAssignments (secure tenants)Burton v Camden LBCCamden LBC v GoldenbergCroydon LBC v Buston and TriancePeabody Donation Fund v HigginsSanctuary Housing Association v Bakersecure tenancies and security of tenure:business tenanciesBusiness tenancies (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 11, Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 4 and Rent Act 1977 s24)Broadway Investments Hackney Ltd v GrantCheryl Investments Ltd v SaldanhaGurton v ParrottLewis v Weldcrest LtdPulleng v CurranTan v SitkowskiWagle v Trustees of Henry Smith’s Charity Kensington EstateWright v Mortimersecure tenancies and security of tenure:consultationHousing management and consultation (secure tenants)secure tenancies and security of tenure:death and successionSuccession to secure tenanciesAustin v Southwark LBCBirmingham CC v WalkerWaltham Forest LBC v ThomasBassetlaw DC v RenshawBrent LBC v FofanaEpping Forest DC v PomphrettIslington LBC v FreemanMarsh v Lewisham LBCMichalak v Wandsworth LBCNewham LBC v PhillipsNewham LBC v RiaPeabody Donation Fund Governors v GrantSheffield CC v WallSheffield CC v Wall (No 2)Westminster CC v PeartSharp v Brent LBCsecure tenancies and security of tenure:definitionIntroductionsecure tenancies and security of tenure:employeesEmployees (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 2)Hughes v Greenwich LBCBrent LBC v CharlesElvidge v Coventry CCGreenfield v Berkshire CCHolmes v South Yorkshire Police AuthoritySouth Glamorgan CC v GriffithsSurrey CC v LamondGodsmark v Greenwich LBCWragg v Surrey CCsecure tenancies and security of tenure:exceptionsIntroductionsecure tenancies and security of tenure:landlord conditionThe landlord conditionAli Bhai and Cabare v Black Roof CHA LtdBanjo v Brent LBCR v Plymouth CC and Cornwall CC ex p FreemanKnowles Housing Association v Millarsecure tenancies and security of tenure:managementHousing management and consultation (secure tenants)secure tenancies and security of tenure:only or principal home, occupation asOccupation as only or principal home: Housing Act 1985 s81 and Housing Act 1988 s1(1)(b); Prohibition against subletting: Housing Act 1985 s93 and Housing Act 1988 s15ABrent LBC v CroninCrawley BC v SawyerGay v SheeranHammersmith and Fulham LBC v ClarkeHussey v Camden LBCJennings v Epping Forest DCLambeth LBC v VandraMerton LBC v SalamaMuir Group Housing Association Ltd v ThornleySutton LBC v SwannUjima Housing Association v AnsahAmoah v Barking and Dagenham LBCWaltham Forest CBHA v FanningNotting Hill Housing Trust v EtoriaMcLoughlin’s Curator Bonis v Motherwell DCsecure tenancies and security of tenure:private sector leasingPrivate sector leasing (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 6)Haringey LBC v HickeyTower Hamlets LBC v AbdiTower Hamlets LBC v MiahWestminster CC v Boraliusecure tenancies and security of tenure:reasonable rentsRents (secure tenants)R v Ealing LBC ex p LewisWandsworth LBC v Winder (No 2)secure tenancies and security of tenure:separate dwelling, let as aLet as a separate dwellingGoodrich v PaisnerUratemp Ventures Ltd v CollinsWestminster CC v ClarkeGray v BrownGrosvenor Estates Belgravia v CochranHorford Investments v LambertKavanagh v LyroudiasMansfield DC v LangridgeMiller v EyoMortgage Corporation v UbahParkins v Westminster CCSt Catherine’s College v DorlingTyler v Kensington and Chelsea RLBCR v Rent Officer of Nottinghamshire Registration Area ex p AllenAndrews v BrewerTomkins v Basildon DCWebb v Barnet LBCsecure tenancies and security of tenure:temporary use pending developmentTemporary use pending development (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 3)Attley v Cherwell DCHyde Housing Association Ltd v HarrisonLillieshall Road Housing Co-operative Ltd v Brennansecure tenancies and security of tenure:variation of non-rent termsVariation of non-rent terms (secure tenants)Palmer v Sandwell MBCR (Kilby) v Basildon DCR v Brent LBC ex p Blattsecurity of tenureIntroductionsecurity of tenure: death and successionSolihull MBC v Hickinsecurity of tenure:assignmentAssignments (secure tenants)Burton v Camden LBCCamden LBC v GoldenbergCroydon LBC v Buston and TriancePeabody Donation Fund v HigginsSanctuary Housing Association v Bakersecurity of tenure:assured shorthold tenanciesIntroductionsecurity of tenure:assured tenancies:board and attendanceBoard and attendancesecurity of tenure:assured tenancies:business tenanciesBusiness tenancies (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 11, Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 4 and Rent Act 1977 s24)Broadway Investments Hackney Ltd v GrantCheryl Investments Ltd v SaldanhaGurton v ParrottLewis v Weldcrest LtdPulleng v CurranTan v SitkowskiWagle v Trustees of Henry Smith’s Charity Kensington EstateWright v Mortimersecurity of tenure:assured tenancies:definitionIntroductionsecurity of tenure:assured tenancies:exceptionsIntroductionBusiness tenancies (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 11, Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 4 and Rent Act 1977 s24)Broadway Investments Hackney Ltd v GrantCheryl Investments Ltd v SaldanhaGurton v ParrottLewis v Weldcrest LtdPulleng v CurranTan v SitkowskiWagle v Trustees of Henry Smith’s Charity Kensington EstateWright v MortimerHoliday lets (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 9 and Rent Act 1977 s9)Buchmann v MayKillick v RobertsR v Rent Officer for Camden LBC ex p PlantMcHale v Danehamsecurity of tenure:assured tenancies:high or low rent, tenancies at aTenancies at a high or low rent (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 paras 2 and 3 and Rent Act 1977 ss4–5)Bostock v Bryant and Anothersecurity of tenure:assured tenancies:holiday letsHoliday lets (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 9 and Rent Act 1977 s9)Buchmann v MayKillick v RobertsR v Rent Officer for Camden LBC ex p PlantMcHale v Danehamsecurity of tenure:assured tenancies:only or principal home, occupation asOccupation as only or principal home: Housing Act 1985 s81 and Housing Act 1988 s1(1)(b); Prohibition against subletting: Housing Act 1985 s93 and Housing Act 1988 s15ABrent LBC v CroninCrawley BC v SawyerGay v SheeranHammersmith and Fulham LBC v ClarkeHussey v Camden LBCJennings v Epping Forest DCLambeth LBC v VandraMerton LBC v SalamaMuir Group Housing Association Ltd v ThornleySutton LBC v SwannUjima Housing Association v AnsahAmoah v Barking and Dagenham LBCWaltham Forest CBHA v FanningNotting Hill Housing Trust v EtoriaMcLoughlin’s Curator Bonis v Motherwell DCsecurity of tenure:assured tenancies:rentRent regulation (assured tenants)Riverside Housing Association Ltd v WhiteBankway Properties v DunsfordContour Homes Ltd v RowenHughes v Borodex LtdR (Lester) v London Rent Assessment CommitteeR (Morris) v London Rent Assessment CommitteeTadema Holdings v FergusonEarl of Cadogan v ChehabGhani v London Rent Assessment CommitteeLondon District Properties Management Ltd v GoolamyN & D (London) Ltd v GadsonR v London Rent Assessment Panel ex p Cadogan EstatesR (Innes) v Northern Rent Assessment PanelRowe v South West Rent Assessment Panelsecurity of tenure:assured tenancies:resident landlordsResident landlords (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 10 and Rent Act 1977 s12)Bardrick v HaycockBarnes v GoresuchCooper v TaitGriffiths v EnglishJackson v PekicLewis-Graham v ConacherO’Sullivan v BarnettPalmer v McNamaraWolff v Waddingtonsecurity of tenure:assured tenancies:separate dwelling, let as aLet as a separate dwellingGoodrich v PaisnerUratemp Ventures Ltd v CollinsWestminster CC v ClarkeGray v BrownGrosvenor Estates Belgravia v CochranHorford Investments v LambertKavanagh v LyroudiasMansfield DC v LangridgeMiller v EyoMortgage Corporation v UbahParkins v Westminster CCSt Catherine’s College v DorlingTyler v Kensington and Chelsea RLBCR v Rent Officer of Nottinghamshire Registration Area ex p AllenAndrews v BrewerTomkins v Basildon DCWebb v Barnet LBCsecurity of tenure:assured tenancies:successionSuccession to assured tenanciesSouthern Housing Group Ltd v Nuttingsecurity of tenure:assured tenancies:transitional provisionsAssured tenancy transitional provisionsLaimond Properties Ltd v Al-ShakarchiRajah v Arogol Co LtdSecretarial Nominee Co Ltd v ThomasTruro Diocesan Board of Finance Ltd v FoleyCrown Estate Commissioners v Governors of the Peabody TrustGoringe v Twinsectra LtdKotecha v Rimingtonsecurity of tenure:assured tenancies:variation of non-rent termsVariation of non-rent terms (secure tenants)security of tenure:bankruptcy and possession claimsPossession claims and bankruptcyHarlow DC v Hallsecurity of tenure:board and attendanceBoard and attendanceOtter v NormanNelson Developments Ltd v TaboadaRita Dale v Adrahill Ltdsecurity of tenure:business tenanciesBusiness tenancies (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 11, Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 4 and Rent Act 1977 s24)Broadway Investments Hackney Ltd v GrantCheryl Investments Ltd v SaldanhaGurton v ParrottLewis v Weldcrest LtdPulleng v CurranTan v SitkowskiWagle v Trustees of Henry Smith’s Charity Kensington EstateWright v Mortimersecurity of tenure:committal for breach of injunctionsInjunctions against tenants and third partiesBarnet LBC v HurstBirmingham CC v FlattLeicester CC v LewisLonghurst Homes Ltd v KillenManchester CC v McCannManchester CC v WorthingtonMedina Housing Association v ConnollyMiddlesbrough BC v TurnbullNottingham CC v CuttsStafford BC v HaynesTower Hamlets LBC v LongWear Valley DC v Robsonsecurity of tenure:common law tenanciesIntroductionsecurity of tenure:company letsCompany letsEaton Square Properties Ltd v O’HigginsEstavest Investments Ltd v Commercial Express Travel LtdHilton v Plustitle LtdKaye v Massbetter Ltd and KanterNavinter SA v Pastollsecurity of tenure:consultationHousing management and consultation (secure tenants)security of tenure:county court claimsAdministrative law and human rights defencessecurity of tenure:curtilage of buildings held for other purposes, withinEmployees (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 2)security of tenure:death and successionSuccession to secure tenanciesAustin v Southwark LBCBirmingham CC v WalkerWaltham Forest LBC v ThomasBassetlaw DC v RenshawBrent LBC v FofanaEpping Forest DC v PomphrettIslington LBC v FreemanMarsh v Lewisham LBCMichalak v Wandsworth LBCNewham LBC v PhillipsNewham LBC v RiaPeabody Donation Fund Governors v GrantSheffield CC v WallSheffield CC v Wall (No 2)Westminster CC v PeartSharp v Brent LBCsecurity of tenure:development, temporary use pendingTemporary use pending development (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 3)Attley v Cherwell DCHyde Housing Association Ltd v HarrisonLillieshall Road Housing Co-operative Ltd v Brennansecurity of tenure:employeesEmployees (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 2)Hughes v Greenwich LBCBrent LBC v CharlesElvidge v Coventry CCGreenfield v Berkshire CCHolmes v South Yorkshire Police AuthoritySouth Glamorgan CC v GriffithsSurrey CC v LamondGodsmark v Greenwich LBCWragg v Surrey CCsecurity of tenure:exceptionsIntroductionsecurity of tenure:exclusionsTemporary use pending development (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 3)Attley v Cherwell DCHyde Housing Association Ltd v HarrisonLillieshall Road Housing Co-operative Ltd v BrennanBusiness tenancies (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 11, Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 4 and Rent Act 1977 s24)Broadway Investments Hackney Ltd v GrantCheryl Investments Ltd v SaldanhaGurton v ParrottLewis v Weldcrest LtdPulleng v CurranTan v SitkowskiWagle v Trustees of Henry Smith’s Charity Kensington EstateWright v MortimerTenancies at a high or low rent (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 paras 2 and 3 and Rent Act 1977 ss4–5)Bostock v Bryant and Anothersecurity of tenure:functional public authorities, housing associations asPoplar Housing and Regeneration Community Association Ltd v Donoghuesecurity of tenure:harassment and illegal evictionCivil proceedingssecurity of tenure:high or low rent, tenancies at aTenancies at a high or low rent (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 paras 2 and 3 and Rent Act 1977 ss4–5)Bostock v Bryant and Anothersecurity of tenure:holiday letsHoliday lets (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 9 and Rent Act 1977 s9)Buchmann v MayKillick v RobertsR v Rent Officer for Camden LBC ex p PlantMcHale v Danehamsecurity of tenure:home loss and disturbance paymentsHome loss and disturbance paymentssecurity of tenure:housing associations as public authoritiesPoplar Housing and Regeneration Community Association Ltd v Donoghuesecurity of tenure:Human Rights Act 1998Poplar Housing and Regeneration Community Association Ltd v Donoghuesecurity of tenure:hybrid authoritiesAdministrative law and human rights defencessecurity of tenure:implied surrenderR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Quigleysecurity of tenure:improper exercise of powersAdministrative law and human rights defencessecurity of tenure:injunctions against tenantsManchester CC v LawlerInjunctions against tenants and third partiesAccent Foundation Ltd v LeeCaradon DC v PatonManchester CC v LeeMoat Housing Group South Ltd v Harris and HartlessNottingham CC v Zain (a minor)Southwark LBC v StorrieHillingdon LBC v VijayatungaSandwell MBC v Preecesecurity of tenure:introductory tenanciesIntroductory tenanciessecurity of tenure:judicial review of eviction decisionsAdministrative law and human rights defencessecurity of tenure:landlord conditionThe landlord conditionAli Bhai and Cabare v Black Roof CHA LtdBanjo v Brent LBCR v Plymouth CC and Cornwall CC ex p FreemanKnowles Housing Association v Millarsecurity of tenure:licencesThe distinction between tenancies and licences – generallysecurity of tenure:licence/tenancy distinctionThe distinction between tenancies and licences – generallysecurity of tenure:managementHousing management and consultation (secure tenants)security of tenure:mandatory nature of possessionPoplar Housing and Regeneration Community Association Ltd v Donoghuesecurity of tenure:mixed business/residential useWagle v Trustees of Henry Smith’s Charity Kensington Estatesecurity of tenure:notice to quitIntroductionsecurity of tenure:obligationsInjunctions against tenants and third partiesAccent Foundation Ltd v LeeCaradon DC v Patonsecurity of tenure:only or principal home, occupation asOccupation as only or principal home: Housing Act 1985 s81 and Housing Act 1988 s1(1)(b); Prohibition against subletting: Housing Act 1985 s93 and Housing Act 1988 s15ABrent LBC v CroninCrawley BC v SawyerGay v SheeranHammersmith and Fulham LBC v ClarkeHussey v Camden LBCJennings v Epping Forest DCLambeth LBC v VandraMerton LBC v SalamaMuir Group Housing Association Ltd v ThornleySutton LBC v SwannUjima Housing Association v AnsahAmoah v Barking and Dagenham LBCWaltham Forest CBHA v FanningNotting Hill Housing Trust v EtoriaMcLoughlin’s Curator Bonis v Motherwell DCsecurity of tenure:part of premises, occupation ofBroadway Investments Hackney Ltd v Grantsecurity of tenure:possession ordersAdministrative law and human rights defencessecurity of tenure:possession proceedingsR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p QuigleyPossession claims and bankruptcyHarlow DC v Hallsecurity of tenure:private and family life and home, right to respect forAdministrative law and human rights defencesPoplar Housing and Regeneration Community Association Ltd v Donoghuesecurity of tenure:private sector leasingPrivate sector leasing (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 6)Haringey LBC v HickeyTower Hamlets LBC v AbdiTower Hamlets LBC v MiahWestminster CC v Boraliusecurity of tenure:proportionalityAdministrative law and human rights defencessecurity of tenure:public authorities: functional public authorities, housing associations asPoplar Housing and Regeneration Community Association Ltd v Donoghuesecurity of tenure:public authorities:housing associationsPoplar Housing and Regeneration Community Association Ltd v Donoghuesecurity of tenure:public authorities:Human Rights Act 1998Poplar Housing and Regeneration Community Association Ltd v Donoghuesecurity of tenure:public authorities:hybridsAdministrative law and human rights defencessecurity of tenure:rent:assured tenanciesRent regulation (assured tenants)Riverside Housing Association Ltd v WhiteBankway Properties v DunsfordContour Homes Ltd v RowenHughes v Borodex LtdR (Lester) v London Rent Assessment CommitteeR (Morris) v London Rent Assessment CommitteeTadema Holdings v FergusonEarl of Cadogan v ChehabGhani v London Rent Assessment CommitteeLondon District Properties Management Ltd v GoolamyN & D (London) Ltd v GadsonR v London Rent Assessment Panel ex p Cadogan EstatesR (Innes) v Northern Rent Assessment PanelRowe v South West Rent Assessment Panelsecurity of tenure:rent:reasonable rentsRents (secure tenants)R v Ealing LBC ex p LewisWandsworth LBC v Winder (No 2)security of tenure:rent:regulationRent regulation (assured tenants)Rent regulation (Rent Act 1977 tenants)security of tenure:rent:secure tenanciesRents (secure tenants)R v Ealing LBC ex p LewisWandsworth LBC v Winder (No 2)security of tenure:Rent Act tenancies:board and attendanceBoard and attendanceOtter v NormanNelson Developments Ltd v TaboadaRita Dale v Adrahill Ltdsecurity of tenure:Rent Act tenancies:business tenanciesBusiness tenancies (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 11, Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 4 and Rent Act 1977 s24)Broadway Investments Hackney Ltd v GrantCheryl Investments Ltd v SaldanhaGurton v ParrottLewis v Weldcrest LtdPulleng v CurranTan v SitkowskiWagle v Trustees of Henry Smith’s Charity Kensington EstateWright v Mortimersecurity of tenure:Rent Act tenancies:definitionIntroductionsecurity of tenure:Rent Act tenancies:exceptionsIntroductionBusiness tenancies (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 11, Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 4 and Rent Act 1977 s24)Broadway Investments Hackney Ltd v GrantCheryl Investments Ltd v SaldanhaGurton v ParrottLewis v Weldcrest LtdPulleng v CurranTan v SitkowskiWagle v Trustees of Henry Smith’s Charity Kensington EstateWright v MortimerHoliday lets (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 9 and Rent Act 1977 s9)Buchmann v MayKillick v RobertsR v Rent Officer for Camden LBC ex p PlantMcHale v DanehamResident landlords (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 10 and Rent Act 1977 s12)Bardrick v HaycockBarnes v GoresuchCooper v TaitGriffiths v Englishsecurity of tenure:Rent Act tenancies:holiday letsHoliday lets (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 9 and Rent Act 1977 s9)Buchmann v MayKillick v RobertsR v Rent Officer for Camden LBC ex p PlantMcHale v Danehamsecurity of tenure:Rent Act tenancies:residence, occupation asOccupation as a residence; Rent Act 1977 s2(1)(a)Hampstead Way Investments Ltd v Lewis-WeareBevington v CrawfordBlanway Investments Ltd v LynchBrickfield Properties Ltd v HughesBrown v BrashCarphone Warehouse UK Ltd v MalekoutGofor Investments v RobertsHall v KingMoreland Properties (UK) Ltd v DhokiaPrince v RobinsonRegalian Securities Ltd v ScheuerRichards v GreenStephens v KerrTickner v HearnWigley v Leighsecurity of tenure:Rent Act tenancies:resident landlordsResident landlords (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 10 and Rent Act 1977 s12)Bardrick v HaycockBarnes v GoresuchCooper v TaitGriffiths v EnglishJackson v PekicLewis-Graham v ConacherO’Sullivan v BarnettPalmer v McNamaraWolff v Waddingtonsecurity of tenure:Rent Act tenancies:separate dwelling, let as aLet as a separate dwellingGoodrich v PaisnerUratemp Ventures Ltd v CollinsWestminster CC v ClarkeGray v BrownGrosvenor Estates Belgravia v CochranHorford Investments v LambertKavanagh v LyroudiasMansfield DC v LangridgeMiller v EyoMortgage Corporation v UbahParkins v Westminster CCSt Catherine’s College v DorlingTyler v Kensington and Chelsea RLBCR v Rent Officer of Nottinghamshire Registration Area ex p AllenAndrews v BrewerTomkins v Basildon DCWebb v Barnet LBCsecurity of tenure:Rent Act tenancies:successionSuccession to Rent Act tenanciesCarega Properties SA v SharrattFitzpatrick v Sterling Housing AssociationGhaidan v Godin-MendozaBrock v WollamsChios Investment Property Co v LopezClore v MacNicolDaejan Properties Ltd v MahoneyHedgedale Ltd v HardsHildebrand v MoonSefton Holdings Ltd v CairnsSwanbrae Ltd v ElliottTennant v HuttonPortman Registrars v Mohammed Latifsecurity of tenure:residence, occupation asOccupation as a residence; Rent Act 1977 s2(1)(a)Hampstead Way Investments Ltd v Lewis-WeareBevington v CrawfordBlanway Investments Ltd v LynchBrickfield Properties Ltd v HughesBrown v BrashCarphone Warehouse UK Ltd v MalekoutGofor Investments v RobertsHall v KingMoreland Properties (UK) Ltd v DhokiaPrince v RobinsonRegalian Securities Ltd v ScheuerRichards v GreenStephens v KerrTickner v HearnWigley v Leighsecurity of tenure:resident landlordsResident landlords (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 10 and Rent Act 1977 s12)Bardrick v HaycockBarnes v GoresuchCooper v TaitGriffiths v EnglishJackson v PekicLewis-Graham v ConacherO’Sullivan v BarnettPalmer v McNamaraWolff v Waddingtonsecurity of tenure:restrictionsInjunctions against tenants and third partiesAccent Foundation Ltd v LeeCaradon DC v Patonsecurity of tenure:rightsInjunctions against tenants and third partiesAccent Foundation Ltd v LeeCaradon DC v Patonsecurity of tenure:separate dwelling, let as aLet as a separate dwellingGoodrich v PaisnerUratemp Ventures Ltd v CollinsWestminster CC v ClarkeGray v BrownGrosvenor Estates Belgravia v CochranHorford Investments v LambertKavanagh v LyroudiasMansfield DC v LangridgeMiller v EyoMortgage Corporation v UbahParkins v Westminster CCSt Catherine’s College v DorlingTyler v Kensington and Chelsea RLBCR v Rent Officer of Nottinghamshire Registration Area ex p AllenAndrews v BrewerTomkins v Basildon DCWebb v Barnet LBCsecurity of tenure:subtenancies, prohibition ofOccupation as only or principal home: Housing Act 1985 s81 and Housing Act 1988 s1(1)(b); Prohibition against subletting: Housing Act 1985 s93 and Housing Act 1988 s15ABrent LBC v CroninCrawley BC v SawyerGay v SheeranHammersmith and Fulham LBC v ClarkeHussey v Camden LBCJennings v Epping Forest DCLambeth LBC v VandraMerton LBC v SalamaMuir Group Housing Association Ltd v ThornleySutton LBC v SwannUjima Housing Association v AnsahAmoah v Barking and Dagenham LBCWaltham Forest CBHA v FanningNotting Hill Housing Trust v EtoriaMcLoughlin’s Curator Bonis v Motherwell DCsecurity of tenure:succession:assured tenanciesSuccession to assured tenanciesSouthern Housing Group Ltd v Nuttingsecurity of tenure:succession:Rent Act tenanciesSuccession to Rent Act tenanciesCarega Properties SA v SharrattFitzpatrick v Sterling Housing AssociationGhaidan v Godin-MendozaBrock v WollamsChios Investment Property Co v LopezClore v MacNicolDaejan Properties Ltd v MahoneyHedgedale Ltd v HardsHildebrand v MoonSefton Holdings Ltd v CairnsSwanbrae Ltd v ElliottTennant v HuttonPortman Registrars v Mohammed Latifsecurity of tenure:succession:secure tenanciesSuccession to secure tenanciesAustin v Southwark LBCBirmingham CC v WalkerWaltham Forest LBC v ThomasBassetlaw DC v RenshawBrent LBC v FofanaEpping Forest DC v PomphrettIslington LBC v FreemanMarsh v Lewisham LBCMichalak v Wandsworth LBCNewham LBC v PhillipsNewham LBC v RiaPeabody Donation Fund Governors v GrantSheffield CC v WallSheffield CC v Wall (No 2)Westminster CC v PeartSharp v Brent LBCsecurity of tenure:surrender, impliedR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Quigleysecurity of tenure:suspension of warrants before executionSuspension of warrants before executionsecurity of tenure:temporary use pending developmentTemporary use pending development (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 3)Attley v Cherwell DCHyde Housing Association Ltd v HarrisonLillieshall Road Housing Co-operative Ltd v Brennansecurity of tenure:Tenant’s CharterHousing management and consultation (secure tenants)security of tenure:variation of non-rent termsVariation of non-rent terms (secure tenants)Palmer v Sandwell MBCR (Kilby) v Basildon DCR v Brent LBC ex p Blattsecurity of tenure:without security, tenureAdministrative law and human rights defencesPoplar Housing and Regeneration Community Association Ltd v DonoghueR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Quigleysensitive tenants next to each other, placingBrent LBC v Doughansentencing:contempt of courtBarnet LBC v HurstLonghurst Homes Ltd v KillenMiddlesbrough BC v TurnbullNottingham CC v CuttsSandwell MBC v Preecesentencing:custodial sentencesBirmingham CC v FlattTower Hamlets LBC v LongWear Valley DC v Robsonsentencing:hearsayWear Valley DC v Robsonsentencing:injunctions, breach ofBarnet LBC v HurstLonghurst Homes Ltd v KillenMiddlesbrough BC v TurnbullNottingham CC v CuttsSandwell MBC v PreeceStafford BC v HaynesTower Hamlets LBC v LongWear Valley DC v Robsonsentencing:lengthBarnet LBC v Hurstsentencing:limited admissionsBarnet LBC v Hurstsentencing:lynch mob behaviourTower Hamlets LBC v Longsentencing:manifest unfairnessNottingham CC v Cuttssentencing:ouster injunctions, breach ofLeicester CC v Lewissentencing:suspended sentence, activation ofSandwell MBC v Preecesentencing:terrorised, where neighbours areWear Valley DC v Robsonsentencing:time on remandR (James) v HM Prison Birmingham and otherssentencing:totality, principle ofSandwell MBC v Preecesentencing:violence, where there is noLonghurst Homes Ltd v Killensentencing:worst cases, maximum sentences forMiddlesbrough BC v Turnbullseparate dwelling, let as aLet as a separate dwellingGoodrich v PaisnerUratemp Ventures Ltd v CollinsWestminster CC v ClarkeGray v BrownGrosvenor Estates Belgravia v CochranHorford Investments v LambertKavanagh v LyroudiasMansfield DC v LangridgeMiller v EyoMortgage Corporation v UbahParkins v Westminster CCSt Catherine’s College v DorlingTyler v Kensington and Chelsea RLBCR v Rent Officer of Nottinghamshire Registration Area ex p AllenAndrews v BrewerTomkins v Basildon DCWebb v Barnet LBCseparate dwelling, let as a:adjoining premisesKavanagh v Lyroudiasseparate dwelling, let as a:assured shorthold tenanciesAndrews v Brewerseparate dwelling, let as a:basements let under head leasesGrosvenor Estates Belgravia v Cochranseparate dwelling, let as a:business tenanciesAndrews v BrewerTomkins v Basildon DCWebb v Barnet LBCseparate dwelling, let as a:buying other flat, loss of licence onTyler v Kensington and Chelsea RLBCseparate dwelling, let as a:caravans moved from time to timeR v Rent Officer of Nottinghamshire Registration Area ex p Allenseparate dwelling, let as a:common rooms, use ofGoodrich v Paisnerseparate dwelling, let as a:contingent on tenancy of other flat, where licence isTyler v Kensington and Chelsea RLBCseparate dwelling, let as a:cooking facilitiesUratemp Ventures Ltd v Collinsseparate dwelling, let as a:dwelling, definition ofUratemp Ventures Ltd v Collinsseparate dwelling, let as a:exclusive possessionWestminster CC v ClarkeMansfield DC v Langridgeseparate dwelling, let as a:hostelsWestminster CC v Clarkeseparate dwelling, let as a:licencesMansfield DC v LangridgeParkins v Westminster CCTyler v Kensington and Chelsea RLBCseparate dwelling, let as a:mixed business/residential useWebb v Barnet LBCseparate dwelling, let as a:rentMansfield DC v Langridgeseparate dwelling, let as a:reservation of right for landlords to live on premises, clear words needed forGray v BrownMiller v Eyoseparate dwelling, let as a:security of tenureLet as a separate dwellingGoodrich v PaisnerUratemp Ventures Ltd v CollinsWestminster CC v ClarkeGray v BrownGrosvenor Estates Belgravia v CochranHorford Investments v LambertKavanagh v LyroudiasMansfield DC v LangridgeMiller v EyoMortgage Corporation v UbahParkins v Westminster CCSt Catherine’s College v DorlingTyler v Kensington and Chelsea RLBCR v Rent Officer of Nottinghamshire Registration Area ex p AllenAndrews v BrewerTomkins v Basildon DCWebb v Barnet LBCseparate dwelling, let as a:several dwellings, premises let asHorford Investments v Lambertseparate dwelling, let as a:shared council housesParkins v Westminster CCseparate dwelling, let as a:sharing with landlordsGoodrich v PaisnerGray v BrownMiller v EyoMortgage Corporation v Ubahseparate dwelling, let as a:termination of business leasesTomkins v Basildon DCseparate dwelling, let as a:units, houses let as number ofSt Catherine’s College v Dorlingservice charges and long leases:accounts of overpayments, need for detailedSt Mary’s Mansions Ltd v Limegate Investment Co Ltdservice charges and long leases:arrearsSella House Ltd v Mearsservice charges and long leases:building contracts, expenses ofCapital and Counties Freehold Equity Trust Ltd v BL plcservice charges and long leases:certaintyHackney LBC v ThompsonSella House Ltd v Mearsservice charges and long leases:change of circumstancesPole Properties Ltd v Feinbergservice charges and long leases:claritySella House Ltd v Mearsservice charges and long leases:construction of provisionsAdelphi (Estates) Ltd v ChristieBillson v TristremBlatherwick (Services) Ltd v KingBoldmark Ltd v CohenGilje v Charlegrove Securities LtdHackney LBC v ThompsonNorthways Flats Management Co (Camden) Ltd v Wimpey Pension Trustees LtdPole Properties Ltd v FeinbergSt Mary’s Mansions Ltd v Limegate Investment Co LtdUnchained Growth III plc v Granby Village (Manchester) Management Co LtdUniversities Superannuation Scheme Ltd v Marks & Spencer plcCapital and Counties Freehold Equity Trust Ltd v BL plcFrobisher (Second Investments) Ltd v Kiloran Trust Co LtdMullaney v Maybourne Grange (Croydon) Management Co LtdNew England Properties plc v Portsmouth News Shops LtdHolding and Management Ltd v Property Holding and Investment Trust plcSella House Ltd v MearsPrimeridge Ltd v Jean Muir Ltdservice charges and long leases:contra proferentem ruleGilje v Charlegrove Securities Ltdservice charges and long leases:costsIperion Investments Corporation v Broadwalk House Residents LtdSella House Ltd v MearsPrimeridge Ltd v Jean Muir Ltdservice charges and long leases:covenantsHackney LBC v ThompsonMullaney v Maybourne Grange (Croydon) Management Co LtdHolding and Management Ltd v Property Holding and Investment Trust plcservice charges and long leases:draftingBillson v Tristremservice charges and long leases:errorsUniversities Superannuation Scheme Ltd v Marks & Spencer plcservice charges and long leases:expenses:building contractsCapital and Counties Freehold Equity Trust Ltd v BL plcservice charges and long leases:expenses:condition precedent as to recovery of costs of worksNorthways Flats Management Co (Camden) Ltd v Wimpey Pension Trustees Ltdservice charges and long leases:expiry of leasesBlatherwick (Services) Ltd v KingCapital and Counties Freehold Equity Trust Ltd v BL plcservice charges and long leases:fair and reasonable approachPole Properties Ltd v Feinbergservice charges and long leases:heating charges, fair and reasonable approach toPole Properties Ltd v Feinbergservice charges and long leases:improvements/repairs distinctionMullaney v Maybourne Grange (Croydon) Management Co LtdHolding and Management Ltd v Property Holding and Investment Trust plcservice charges and long leases:incurred, when costs areFrobisher (Second Investments) Ltd v Kiloran Trust Co Ltdservice charges and long leases:indemnity costsPrimeridge Ltd v Jean Muir Ltdservice charges and long leases:intentionBillson v Tristremservice charges and long leases:interestBoldmark Ltd v Cohenservice charges and long leases:maintenanceUnchained Growth III plc v Granby Village (Manchester) Management Co Ltdservice charges and long leases:overpayments, need for detailed accounts ofSt Mary’s Mansions Ltd v Limegate Investment Co Ltdservice charges and long leases:reasonablenessPole Properties Ltd v Feinbergservice charges and long leases:reasonableness:fair and reasonable approachPole Properties Ltd v Feinbergservice charges and long leases:reasonableness:heating chargesPole Properties Ltd v Feinbergservice charges and long leases:repairs:covenantsMullaney v Maybourne Grange (Croydon) Management Co LtdHolding and Management Ltd v Property Holding and Investment Trust plcservice charges and long leases:repairs:enforcement of covenantsHolding and Management Ltd v Property Holding and Investment Trust plcservice charges and long leases:repairs:improvements/repairs distinctionMullaney v Maybourne Grange (Croydon) Management Co LtdHolding and Management Ltd v Property Holding and Investment Trust plcservice charges and long leases:restrictive interpretationGilje v Charlegrove Securities Ltdservice charges and long leases:roofs, new and improvedNew England Properties plc v Portsmouth News Shops Ltdservice charges and long leases:set-offUnchained Growth III plc v Granby Village (Manchester) Management Co Ltdservice charges and long leases:solicitors to recover arrears from other tenants, costs ofSella House Ltd v Mearsservice charges and long leases:statutory provisionsIperion Investments Corporation v Broadwalk House Residents Ltdservice charges and long leases:statutory tenants, lessees becomingBlatherwick (Services) Ltd v Kingservice charges and long leases:whole, leases to be read as aBillson v Tristremservice of notice to quit by one joint tenant :validityLeckhampton Dairies Ltd v Artus Whitfield Ltdservices, laundry and cleaning, contractual right toHuwyler v Ruddyservices, withdrawal of:harassment and illegal evictionHousing Act 1988 ss27 and 28services, withdrawal of:reasonable groundsHousing Act 1988 ss27 and 28set-off:anti-set-off clausesCody v Philpsset-off:damagesDamagesAhmed v Southwark LBCBerryman v Hounslow LBCBrent LBC v Carmel (sued as Murphy)Calabar Properties Ltd v StitcherChiodi v De MarneyDavies v PetersonEzekiel v McDadeIrontrain Investments Ltd v AnsariLavimizadeh v Lambeth LBCLubren v Lambeth LBCMarshall v Rubypoint LtdMcGreal v WakeEdlington Properties Ltd v Fenner & Co LtdFilross Securities v MidgeleyMaunder Taylor v BlaquiereMuscat v SmithKaur v GillNwokorie v Masonset-off:disrepairDamagesAhmed v Southwark LBCBerryman v Hounslow LBCBrent LBC v Carmel (sued as Murphy)Calabar Properties Ltd v StitcherChiodi v De MarneyDavies v PetersonEzekiel v McDadeIrontrain Investments Ltd v AnsariLavimizadeh v Lambeth LBCLubren v Lambeth LBCMarshall v Rubypoint LtdMcGreal v WakeEdlington Properties Ltd v Fenner & Co LtdFilross Securities v MidgeleyMaunder Taylor v BlaquiereMuscat v Smithset-off:harassment and illegal evictionKalas v FarmerKaur v GillNwokorie v Masonset-off:mortgage possession proceedingsRoyal Bank of Scotland v O’Sheaset-off:original landlordsEdlington Properties Ltd v Fenner & Co Ltdset-off:service charges and long leasesUnchained Growth III plc v Granby Village (Manchester) Management Co Ltdset-off:successionMuscat v Smithset-off:time limitsFilross Securities v Midgeleyset-off:unfair contract terms, exclusion clauses andSet-off and counterclaimCody v Philpssetting aside possession ordersSetting aside possession ordersBank of Scotland v PereiraForcelux Ltd v BinnieGovernors of Peabody Donation Fund v HayHackney LBC v FindlayTower Hamlets LBC v AbadieClapton Community Housing Trust v McGrathLewisham LBC v Gurbuzsetting aside possession orders:abuse of processHammersmith and Fulham LBC v Hillsetting aside possession orders:adjournmentsSecond WRVS Housing Society v Blairsetting aside possession orders:appealsSetting aside possession orderssetting aside possession orders:attendance at courtSetting aside possession orderssetting aside possession orders:Civil Procedure RulesSetting aside possession ordersBank of Scotland v PereiraForcelux Ltd v BinnieHackney LBC v Findlaysetting aside possession orders:commencement of possession proceedingsCamden LBC v Msetting aside possession orders:county court orders by Supreme CourtManchester CC v Pinnock (No 2)setting aside possession orders:criteriaBank of Scotland v Pereirasetting aside possession orders:delayTower Hamlets LBC v Abadiesetting aside possession orders:evidenceLewisham LBC v Gurbuzsetting aside possession orders:execution of orders ceasing to have effectGovernors of Peabody Donation Fund v Haysetting aside possession orders:fraudHammersmith and Fulham LBC v Hillsetting aside possession orders:good faithLewisham LBC v Gurbuzsetting aside possession orders:harassment and illegal evictionBotu v Brent LBCsetting aside possession orders:initial possession hearings as not being a trialForcelux Ltd v Binniesetting aside possession orders:mental capacity of tenantsCamden LBC v Msetting aside possession orders:nuisance and annoyanceSheffield CC v Fletchersetting aside possession orders:oppressionHammersmith and Fulham LBC v Hillsetting aside possession orders:prejudice, delay where council would not beTower Hamlets LBC v Abadiesetting aside possession orders:rent arrearsBrent LBC v MarksSecond WRVS Housing Society v Blairsetting aside possession orders:social security benefits position, ascertaining theSecond WRVS Housing Society v Blairsetting aside possession orders:summons sent to tenants, no evidence thatPatel v Smeatonsetting aside possession orders:warrants 1.2Hackney LBC v WhiteSetting aside warrants after executionCamden LBC v AkanniHackney LBC v WhiteHammersmith and Fulham LBC v HillHammersmith and Fulham LBC v LemehIslington LBC v HarridgeJephson Homes HA v MoisejevsLambeth LBC v HughesSaint v Barking and Dagenham LBCSouthwark LBC v SarfoSouthwark LBC v St BriceTower Hamlets LBC v AzadRendham Holdings Ltd v Patelsetting aside possession orders:wrong time of hearings, where tenants toldClapton Community Housing Trust v McGrathsetting aside warrants after executionHackney LBC v WhiteSetting aside warrants after executionCamden LBC v AkanniHackney LBC v WhiteHammersmith and Fulham LBC v HillHammersmith and Fulham LBC v LemehIslington LBC v HarridgeJephson Homes HA v MoisejevsLambeth LBC v HughesSaint v Barking and Dagenham LBCSouthwark LBC v SarfoSouthwark LBC v St BriceTower Hamlets LBC v AzadRendham Holdings Ltd v Patelsetting aside warrants after execution:abuse of processHackney LBC v WhiteSetting aside warrants after executionCamden LBC v AkanniHackney LBC v WhiteHammersmith and Fulham LBC v HillJephson Homes HA v Moisejevssetting aside warrants after execution:actions of court, oppression resulting fromHammersmith and Fulham LBC v Lemehsetting aside warrants after execution:administrative acts without hearings, issue of warrants asSouthwark LBC v St Bricesetting aside warrants after execution:assured tenanciesSetting aside warrants after executionsetting aside warrants after execution:defective warrantsTower Hamlets LBC v Azadsetting aside warrants after execution:delaySouthwark LBC v Sarfosetting aside warrants after execution:discriminationSouthwark LBC v St Bricesetting aside warrants after execution:errors in applications for warrantsTower Hamlets LBC v Azadsetting aside warrants after execution:fair hearing, right to aSouthwark LBC v St Bricesetting aside warrants after execution:faultJephson Homes HA v Moisejevssetting aside warrants after execution:fraudSetting aside warrants after executionHammersmith and Fulham LBC v Hillsetting aside warrants after execution:full payment of arrears, insistence ofLambeth LBC v Hughessetting aside warrants after execution:housing benefitSaint v Barking and Dagenham LBCRendham Holdings Ltd v Patelsetting aside warrants after execution:notice of evictionJephson Homes HA v Moisejevssetting aside warrants after execution:oppressionSetting aside warrants after executionHammersmith and Fulham LBC v HillHammersmith and Fulham LBC v LemehJephson Homes HA v MoisejevsLambeth LBC v HughesSouthwark LBC v SarfoRendham Holdings Ltd v Patelsetting aside warrants after execution:payment of rent arrearsLambeth LBC v HughesSaint v Barking and Dagenham LBCsetting aside warrants after execution:prison, where council know tenants are inSaint v Barking and Dagenham LBCsetting aside warrants after execution:private and family life, right to respect forSouthwark LBC v St Bricesetting aside warrants after execution:Rent Act tenanciesSetting aside warrants after executionsetting aside warrants after execution:rent arrearsSetting aside warrants after executionLambeth LBC v HughesSaint v Barking and Dagenham LBCRendham Holdings Ltd v Patelsetting aside warrants after execution:secure tenanciesSetting aside warrants after executionsetting aside warrants after execution:stale judgmentsHackney LBC v WhiteHackney LBC v Whitesetting aside warrants after execution:stay of execution, failure to consider applications forRendham Holdings Ltd v Patelsetting aside warrants after execution:suspension of warrants where application not heard prior to hearingsIslington LBC v Harridgesetting aside warrants after execution:wrong amount, applications for warrants statingSaint v Barking and Dagenham LBCsettled accommodation and homelessness:abroad, unlawful occupied propertyR v Croydon LBC ex p Easomsettled accommodation and homelessness:affordabilityMohamed v Westminster CCsettled accommodation and homelessness:anti-social behaviourR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Psettled accommodation and homelessness:assured shorthold tenanciesKnight v Vale Royal BCsettled accommodation and homelessness:before start of tenancies, deliberate actsMinchin v Sheffield CCsettled accommodation and homelessness:caravans on unauthorised sitesSteward v Kingston upon Thames RLBCsettled accommodation and homelessness:causationCausation and settled accommodationBratton v Croydon LBCDenton v Southwark LBCDyson v Kerrier DCKnight v Vale Royal BCMinchin v Sheffield CCMohamed v Westminster CCR v Gloucester CC ex p MilesSteward v Kingston upon Thames RLBCStewart v Lambeth LBCWatchman v Ipswich BCR v Basingstoke and Deane BC ex p BassettR v Croydon LBC ex p EasomR v Hackney LBC ex p AjayiR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p PR v Hounslow LBC ex p RR v Merton LBC ex p RuffleR v Newham LBC ex p CampbellR v Shrewsbury and Atcham BC ex p GriffithsR v Westminster CC ex p ReidR v Kyle and Carrick DC ex p Robsonsettled accommodation and homelessness:chain of causation, breaking theR v Hackney LBC ex p Ajayisettled accommodation and homelessness:conduct of children towards parentsDenton v Southwark LBCsettled accommodation and homelessness:death threats from IRAR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Psettled accommodation and homelessness:employment, loss ofWatchman v Ipswich BCsettled accommodation and homelessness:fact and degree, questions ofKnight v Vale Royal BCsettled accommodation and homelessness:harassmentR v Newham LBC ex p Campbellsettled accommodation and homelessness:imprisonmentStewart v Lambeth LBCsettled accommodation and homelessness:income supportR v Shrewsbury and Atcham BC ex p Griffithssettled accommodation and homelessness:intention, relevance ofR v Kyle and Carrick DC ex p Robsonsettled accommodation and homelessness:intentional homelessnessIntentional homelessnessDin v Wandsworth LBCR v Brent LBC ex p AwuaCausation and settled accommodationBratton v Croydon LBCDenton v Southwark LBCDyson v Kerrier DCKnight v Vale Royal BCMinchin v Sheffield CCMohamed v Westminster CCR v Gloucester CC ex p MilesSteward v Kingston upon Thames RLBCStewart v Lambeth LBCWatchman v Ipswich BCR v Basingstoke and Deane BC ex p BassettR v Croydon LBC ex p EasomR v Hackney LBC ex p AjayiR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p PR v Hounslow LBC ex p RR v Merton LBC ex p RuffleR v Newham LBC ex p CampbellR v Shrewsbury and Atcham BC ex p GriffithsR v Westminster CC ex p ReidR v Kyle and Carrick DC ex p Robsonsettled accommodation and homelessness:last period of settled accommodationDin v Wandsworth LBCsettled accommodation and homelessness:main housing dutyR v Brent LBC ex p Awuasettled accommodation and homelessness:marriage, breakdown ofR v Basingstoke and Deane BC ex p Bassettsettled accommodation and homelessness:mortgagesWatchman v Ipswich BCR v Shrewsbury and Atcham BC ex p Griffithssettled accommodation and homelessness:obiter dicta commentsR v Wandsworth LBC ex p Wingrove and Mansoorsettled accommodation and homelessness:overcrowdingMohamed v Westminster CCsettled accommodation and homelessness:pregnancyR v Hackney LBC ex p Ajayisettled accommodation and homelessness:reason for loss of most recent accommodation, consideration ofDyson v Kerrier DCsettled accommodation and homelessness:reasonablenessR v Hounslow LBC ex p RR v Westminster CC ex p Reidsettled accommodation and homelessness:rent arrears, cause ofBratton v Croydon LBCsettled accommodation and homelessness:ScotlandR v Kyle and Carrick DC ex p Robsonsettled accommodation and homelessness:slapping childrenR v Westminster CC ex p Reidsettled accommodation and homelessness:temporary or settled, property as being eitherR v Merton LBC ex p Rufflesettled accommodation and homelessness:testR v Hounslow LBC ex p Rsettled accommodation and homelessness:vandalismR v Gloucester CC ex p Milessettled accommodation and homelessness:violenceR v Newham LBC ex p Campbellsettlements :consent ordersR v Birmingham CC ex p Foleysettlements :disrepairChin v Hackney LBCsettlements :Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings underMiddlemast v Hammersmith and Fulham LBCsettlements :mortgage possession proceedingsBradford and Bingley plc v Rashidsettlements :res judicataChin v Hackney LBCsettlements :time limits extended by offers of settlementBradford and Bingley plc v Rashidsettlements :without prejudice correspondenceBradford and Bingley plc v Rashidsexual orientation :discriminationGhaidan v Godin-Mendozasexual orientation :family members, asFitzpatrick v Sterling Housing Associationsexual orientation :private and family life and home, right to respect forGhaidan v Godin-Mendozasexual orientation :same sex partnersSuccession to assured tenanciesSouthern Housing Group Ltd v NuttingFitzpatrick v Sterling Housing AssociationGhaidan v Godin-Mendozasexual orientation :successionFitzpatrick v Sterling Housing AssociationGhaidan v Godin-Mendozashams:assured shorthold tenanciesBhopal v Waliashams:company letsEaton Square Properties Ltd v O’HigginsEstavest Investments Ltd v Commercial Express Travel LtdHilton v Plustitle LtdKaye v Massbetter Ltd and KanterNavinter SA v Pastollshams:directors or shareholders, where occupiers are neitherNavinter SA v Pastollshams:employeesGodsmark v Greenwich LBCshams:extreme, terms of licence as beingCrancour Ltd v Da Silvaesashams:higher rent, written agreements forBhopal v Waliashams:holiday letsBuchmann v Mayshams:intention for company to be tenantKaye v Massbetter Ltd and Kantershams:leave room for 90 mins a day, requirement toAslan v Murphy (No 1)shams:licence/tenancy distinctionAslan v Murphy (No 1)Crancour Ltd v Da Silvaesashams:rent, where company pays theEstavest Investments Ltd v Commercial Express Travel Ltdshams:set up company, where tenant is required toHilton v Plustitle Ltdshams:tax advantagesEaton Square Properties Ltd v O’Higginsshopping centresManchester CC v Lawlershops, protection of tenants aboveWellcome Trust v Hamadsingle men with health problems, inadequate enquiries aboutBenson v Lewisham LBCslapping childrenR v Westminster CC ex p Reidsleep:resident landlord does not sleep on premisesPalmer v McNamarasleep:rough sleepingOgle v Bundhoosleep:use of flats only for sleepHampstead Way Investments Ltd v Lewis-Wearesocial factors consideration ofPolonski v Lloyds Bank Mortgages LtdR v Newham LBC ex p AjayiR v Lewisham LBC ex p Dolansocial security benefits:abroad, accommodation situatedR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Duro-Ramasocial security benefits:ascertain social security position, setting aside orders toSecond WRVS Housing Society v Blairsocial security benefits:direct payments, possibility ofSecond WRVS Housing Society v Blairsocial security benefits:disability living allowanceAli v Camden LBCsocial security benefits:income supportR v Shrewsbury and Atcham BC ex p Griffithssocial security benefits:rent arrearsSecond WRVS Housing Society v Blairsocial workers, statements ofR v Nottingham CC ex p Costellosolicitors, problems with findingBarrett v Southwark LBCsound insulationSouthwark LBC v Mills; Southwark LBC v Tanner; Baxter v Camden LBCR (Vella) v Lambeth LBC and London and Quadrant Housing Trustspecification of worksEast Staffordshire BC v Fairlessspouses and partners :acquiescence, intentional homelessness andR v North Devon DC ex p LewisR v Swansea CC ex p Johnspouses and partners :assets on termination of tenanciesNewlon Housing Trust v Al-Sulaimenspouses and partners :cohabitees, succession ofSuccession to assured tenanciesspouses and partners :continued occupation, reasonableness ofHemans v Windsor and Maidenhead RBCspouses and partners :ex-partners, being expected to reside withR v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p Moncadaspouses and partners :excluded spouses, breaches byBarnet LBC v Hurleyspouses and partners :homelessness:repeat applicationsR (Griffin) v Southwark LBCspouses and partners :homelessness:settled accommodationR v Basingstoke and Deane BC ex p Bassettspouses and partners :leave, not asking partners toR v Swansea CC ex p Johnspouses and partners :matrimonial homesHall v KingChurch Commissioners for England v Al-Emarahspouses and partners :nuisance caused by partnersR v Swansea CC ex p Johnspouses and partners :reasonable to believe spouses would accommodate partnersR v Barking and Dagenham LBC ex p Okuneyespouses and partners :refusal of parents to allow partners to live with applicantsR v Peterborough CC ex p Carrspouses and partners :same sex partnersSuccession to assured tenanciesSouthern Housing Group Ltd v NuttingFitzpatrick v Sterling Housing AssociationGhaidan v Godin-Mendozaspouses and partners :settled accommodation and intentional homelessnessR v Basingstoke and Deane BC ex p Bassettspouses and partners :successionSuccession to assured tenanciesspouses and partners :suspension of warrants before executionBarnet LBC v Hurleyspouses and partners :transfersChurch Commissioners for England v Al-Emarahspouses and partners :visits to partners not amounting to occupationIbie v TrubshawsquattersSwordheath Properties Ltd v Floyddstairs:collapseSheriden v Broadbridgestanding :agentsChesters Accommodation Agency Ltd v Abebresestanding :commencement of possession proceedingsAlamo Housing Co-operative Ltd v MeredithChesters Accommodation Agency Ltd v Abebresestanding :mortgage possession proceedingsNationwide Building Society v Purvisstanding :service of notice to quitAlamo Housing Co-operative Ltd v Meredithstanding :sufficient interestCountryside Residential (North Thames) Ltd v TugwellAlamo Housing Co-operative Ltd v Meredithstanding :trespassersCountryside Residential (North Thames) Ltd v Tugwellstatements of truth, no rubber stamping ofBirmingham CC v Hoseystay of possession proceedingsMoat Housing Group South Ltd v Harris and Hartlessstep children, succession ofSheffield CC v Wall (No 2)steps:garden steps, defects inMcAuley v Bristol CCsteps:mossBrunskill v Mulcahysteps:staircasesSheriden v Broadbridgesteps:steepnessHanley v Tameside MBCstriking outKelsey Housing Association v KingLaw Land v SinclairBarclays Bank plc v Brooksstructure:block of flatsAdami v Lincoln Grange Management Ltdstructure:condensationQuick v Taff-Ely BCstructure:floor joistsFincar SRL v 109/113 Mount Street Management Co Ltdstructure:outside wallsCampden Hill Towers Ltd v Gardnerstructure:ownership of landlords, not limited to items inMarlborough Park Services Ltd v Rowe and anotherstructure:physical damageSouthwark LBC v McIntoshstructure:plasterHussein v MehlmanGrand v Gillstructure:roof terraces of flatsIbrahim v Dovecorn Reversions Ltdstructure:roofsDouglas-Scott v ScorgieIbrahim v Dovecorn Reversions Ltdstructure:subsidenceSmedley v Chumley and Hawkes Ltdstructure:surfacesHallisey v Petmoor Developments LtdIbrahim v Dovecorn Reversions Ltdstructure:wallsSmedley v Chumley and Hawkes LtdCampden Hill Towers Ltd v GardnerFincar SRL v 109/113 Mount Street Management Co LtdHallisey v Petmoor Developments Ltdstudents whilst studying, disturbance ofSpeiro Lechouritis v Goldmile Properties Ltdsubcontractors, negligence byD & F Estates Ltd v Church Commissionerssubletting whole of premises as ground for possessionSubletting the whole of premisesLeith Properties Ltd v SpringerPazgate Ltd v McGrathRC Glaze Properties Ltd v Alabdinbonisubletting whole of premises as ground for possession:assignment, consent toPazgate Ltd v McGrathsubletting whole of premises as ground for possession:assured tenanciesSubletting the whole of premisessubletting whole of premises as ground for possession:consentSubletting the whole of premisesLeith Properties Ltd v SpringerPazgate Ltd v McGrathsubletting whole of premises as ground for possession:discretionary groundsSubletting the whole of premisessubletting whole of premises as ground for possession:notice to quitSubletting the whole of premisessubletting whole of premises as ground for possession:Rent Act tenanciesSubletting the whole of premisessubletting whole of premises as ground for possession:rent books containing prohibitionRC Glaze Properties Ltd v Alabdinbonisubletting whole of premises as ground for possession:secure tenanciesSubletting the whole of premisessubsidenceSmedley v Chumley and Hawkes LtdsubtenanciesIslington LBC v GreenKeepers and Governors of the Free Grammar School of John Lyon v JamesMonmouth BC v MarlogShepherd’s Bush Housing Association v HATS Co-operative of Hammersmith LtdWellcome Trust v HamadCamden LBC v Shortlife Community Housing Ltd and Otherssubtenancies:breach of covenantRoundlistic Limited v Jonessubtenancies:burden of proofWaltham Forest CBHA v Fanningsubtenancies:commencement of possession proceedingsAlamo Housing Co-operative Ltd v Meredithsubtenancies:forfeitureKeepers and Governors of the Free Grammar School of John Lyon v JamesAshton v Sobelmansubtenancies:form intention to return, where tenant could notMcLoughlin’s Curator Bonis v Motherwell DCsubtenancies:grounds for possessionSubletting the whole of premisesLeith Properties Ltd v SpringerPazgate Ltd v McGrathRC Glaze Properties Ltd v Alabdinbonisubtenancies:head leases, staying on after termination ofVaughan-Armatrading v Sarsahsubtenancies:Housing Act 1985Occupation as only or principal home: Housing Act 1985 s81 and Housing Act 1988 s1(1)(b); Prohibition against subletting: Housing Act 1985 s93 and Housing Act 1988 s15ABrent LBC v CroninCrawley BC v SawyerGay v SheeranHammersmith and Fulham LBC v ClarkeHussey v Camden LBCJennings v Epping Forest DCLambeth LBC v VandraMerton LBC v SalamaMuir Group Housing Association Ltd v ThornleySutton LBC v SwannUjima Housing Association v AnsahAmoah v Barking and Dagenham LBCWaltham Forest CBHA v FanningNotting Hill Housing Trust v EtoriaMcLoughlin’s Curator Bonis v Motherwell DCsubtenancies:Housing Act 1988Occupation as only or principal home: Housing Act 1985 s81 and Housing Act 1988 s1(1)(b); Prohibition against subletting: Housing Act 1985 s93 and Housing Act 1988 s15ABrent LBC v CroninCrawley BC v SawyerGay v SheeranHammersmith and Fulham LBC v ClarkeHussey v Camden LBCJennings v Epping Forest DCLambeth LBC v VandraMerton LBC v SalamaMuir Group Housing Association Ltd v ThornleySutton LBC v SwannUjima Housing Association v AnsahAmoah v Barking and Dagenham LBCWaltham Forest CBHA v FanningNotting Hill Housing Trust v EtoriaMcLoughlin’s Curator Bonis v Motherwell DCsubtenancies:ill tenantsMcLoughlin’s Curator Bonis v Motherwell DC12subtenancies:intention:burden of proofWaltham Forest CBHA v Fanningsubtenancies:intention:enduring intentionHammersmith and Fulham LBC v Clarkesubtenancies:intention:form intention to return, where tenant could notMcLoughlin’s Curator Bonis v Motherwell DCsubtenancies:joint tenanciesGay v Sheeransubtenancies:licences:housing associations, grant toIslington LBC v Greensubtenancies:licences:licence/tenancy distinctionVaughan-Armatrading v Sarsahsubtenancies:licences:possession, local authorities entitlement toCamden LBC v Shortlife Community Housing Ltd and Otherssubtenancies:licences:sharing council flats with tenantsMonmouth BC v Marlogsubtenancies:life prisoners, real possibility of return ofNotting Hill Housing Trust v Etoriasubtenancies:mesne profitsBraintree DC v Vincentsubtenancies:mortgage possession proceedingsCitibank International plc v Kesslersubtenancies:notice seeking possessionBraintree DC v Vincentsubtenancies:notice to quitHammersmith and Fulham LBC v ClarkePennell v Paynesubtenancies:nuisance and annoyanceAnti-social behavioursubtenancies:objective intentionUjima Housing Association v Ansahsubtenancies:occupation as a residenceMoreland Properties (UK) Ltd v Dhokiasubtenancies:only or principal home requirementOccupation as only or principal home: Housing Act 1985 s81 and Housing Act 1988 s1(1)(b); Prohibition against subletting: Housing Act 1985 s93 and Housing Act 1988 s15ABrent LBC v CroninCrawley BC v SawyerGay v SheeranHammersmith and Fulham LBC v ClarkeHussey v Camden LBCJennings v Epping Forest DCLambeth LBC v VandraMerton LBC v SalamaMuir Group Housing Association Ltd v ThornleySutton LBC v SwannUjima Housing Association v AnsahAmoah v Barking and Dagenham LBCWaltham Forest CBHA v FanningNotting Hill Housing Trust v EtoriaMcLoughlin’s Curator Bonis v Motherwell DCsubtenancies:part of premisesMerton LBC v Salamasubtenancies:physical signs of continued occupationCrawley BC v Sawyersubtenancies:possession orders/claimsCamden LBC v Shortlife Community Housing Ltd and Otherssubtenancies:prisoners:life prisoners, real possibility of return ofNotting Hill Housing Trust v Etoriasubtenancies:prisoners:long sentences, servingAmoah v Barking and Dagenham LBCsubtenancies:private sectorPrivate sector leasing (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 6)Haringey LBC v HickeyTower Hamlets LBC v AbdiTower Hamlets LBC v MiahWestminster CC v Boraliusubtenancies:Rent Act tenants above shopsWellcome Trust v Hamadsubtenancies:residence requirementCrawley BC v SawyerGay v SheeranNotting Hill Housing Trust v Etoriasubtenancies:resumption of occupation after loss of secure tenanciesHussey v Camden LBCsubtenancies:return after temporary absences, toCrawley BC v Sawyersubtenancies:right to buyJennings v Epping Forest DCMuir Group Housing Association Ltd v ThornleySutton LBC v Swannsubtenancies:ScotlandMcLoughlin’s Curator Bonis v Motherwell DCsubtenancies:secure tenanciesHussey v Camden LBCJennings v Epping Forest DCMuir Group Housing Association Ltd v ThornleySutton LBC v SwannMcLoughlin’s Curator Bonis v Motherwell DCsubtenancies:security of tenureOccupation as only or principal home: Housing Act 1985 s81 and Housing Act 1988 s1(1)(b); Prohibition against subletting: Housing Act 1985 s93 and Housing Act 1988 s15ABrent LBC v CroninCrawley BC v SawyerGay v SheeranHammersmith and Fulham LBC v ClarkeHussey v Camden LBCJennings v Epping Forest DCLambeth LBC v VandraMerton LBC v SalamaMuir Group Housing Association Ltd v ThornleySutton LBC v SwannUjima Housing Association v AnsahAmoah v Barking and Dagenham LBCWaltham Forest CBHA v FanningNotting Hill Housing Trust v EtoriaMcLoughlin’s Curator Bonis v Motherwell DCsubtenancies:service of notice to quitAlamo Housing Co-operative Ltd v Meredithsubtenancies:sharing council flats with tenantsMonmouth BC v Marlogsubtenancies:shops, protection of tenants aboveWellcome Trust v Hamadsubtenancies:staying on after termination of head leasesVaughan-Armatrading v Sarsahsubtenancies:sufficient interest to evictAlamo Housing Co-operative Ltd v Meredithsubtenancies:surrenderBasingstoke and Deane BC v Paicesubtenancies:temporary absencesBrent LBC v CroninCrawley BC v Sawyersubtenancies:temporary occupancy by othersHussey v Camden LBCsubtenancies:tenant conditionOccupation as only or principal home: Housing Act 1985 s81 and Housing Act 1988 s1(1)(b); Prohibition against subletting: Housing Act 1985 s93 and Housing Act 1988 s15Asubtenancies:termination of head leases, ending of interests withShepherd’s Bush Housing Association v HATS Co-operative of Hammersmith Ltdsubtenancies:transfer of tenanciesGay v Sheeransubtenancies:whole of flatsMerton LBC v Salamasuccession:2-year relationshipsChios Investment Property Co v Lopezsuccession:12 months residenceWaltham Forest LBC v ThomasWestminster CC v PeartsuccessionSuccession to secure tenanciesAustin v Southwark LBCBirmingham CC v WalkerWaltham Forest LBC v ThomasBassetlaw DC v RenshawBrent LBC v FofanaEpping Forest DC v PomphrettIslington LBC v FreemanMarsh v Lewisham LBCMichalak v Wandsworth LBCNewham LBC v PhillipsNewham LBC v RiaPeabody Donation Fund Governors v GrantSheffield CC v WallSheffield CC v Wall (No 2)Westminster CC v PeartSharp v Brent LBCsuccession:assignment after surrender by siblingsClore v MacNicolsuccession:assurancesDaejan Properties Ltd v Mahoneysuccession:assured tenanciesSuccession to assured tenanciesSouthern Housing Group Ltd v Nuttingsuccession:burden of proofPeabody Donation Fund Governors v Grantsuccession:carersHildebrand v Moonsuccession:children:carersHildebrand v Moonsuccession:children:de factoBrock v WollamsSefton Holdings Ltd v Cairnssuccession:children:foster childrenSheffield CC v Wallsuccession:children:part time with parents, children livingSwanbrae Ltd v Elliottsuccession:children:Rent Act tenanciesPortman Registrars v Mohammed Latifsuccession:children:secure tenanciesSheffield CC v WallSheffield CC v Wall (No 2)succession:civil partnersSuccession to assured tenanciessuccession:close relationships between strangersCarega Properties SA v Sharrattsuccession:cohabiteesSuccession to assured tenanciessuccession:common law succession, suspension ofNewham LBC v Riasuccession:conditions, proof ofPeabody Donation Fund Governors v Grantsuccession:de facto childrenBrock v WollamsSefton Holdings Ltd v Cairnssuccession:death of tenantsDeath of tenantWandsworth LBC v Randallsuccession:different accommodation, offers ofSharp v Brent LBCsuccession:discriminationGhaidan v Godin-Mendozasuccession:duration of relationshipsChios Investment Property Co v Lopezsuccession:duration of residenceWaltham Forest LBC v ThomasWestminster CC v Peartsuccession:estoppel where assurances givenDaejan Properties Ltd v Mahoneysuccession:evidenceMarsh v Lewisham LBCsuccession:family membersCarega Properties SA v SharrattFitzpatrick v Sterling Housing AssociationBrock v WollamsSefton Holdings Ltd v Cairnssuccession:foster childrenSheffield CC v Wallsuccession:garden until becoming a tenant, successors not liable for deterioration ofHolloway v Poveysuccession:homelessness duty, acceptance ofSharp v Brent LBCsuccession:hospital, temporary absences inHedgedale Ltd v Hardssuccession:Housing Act 1980, survivorship beforeBirmingham CC v Walkersuccession:illegitimate childrenSheffield CC v Wall (No 2)succession:intentionHildebrand v Moonsuccession:joint successionNewham LBC v Phillipssuccession:joint tenantsBassetlaw DC v RenshawFitzpatrick v Sterling Housing Associationsuccession:letters to deceased spouses interpreted as new tenanciesEpping Forest DC v Pomphrettsuccession:member of another’s family, definition ofSuccession to secure tenanciessuccession:member of family, definition ofBrent LBC v FofanaMichalak v Wandsworth LBCsuccession:nurse parents, children moving in toHildebrand v Moonsuccession:part time with parents, children livingSwanbrae Ltd v Elliottsuccession:physical presence as residing with, mereIslington LBC v Freemansuccession:possession ordersAustin v Southwark LBCsuccession:postponement of date of possession due to deathAustin v Southwark LBCsuccession:private and family life and home, right to respect forMichalak v Wandsworth LBCGhaidan v Godin-MendozaSharp v Brent LBCsuccession:Rent Act tenanciesSuccession to Rent Act tenanciesCarega Properties SA v SharrattFitzpatrick v Sterling Housing AssociationGhaidan v Godin-MendozaBrock v WollamsChios Investment Property Co v LopezClore v MacNicolDaejan Properties Ltd v MahoneyHedgedale Ltd v HardsHildebrand v MoonSefton Holdings Ltd v CairnsSwanbrae Ltd v ElliottTennant v HuttonPortman Registrars v Mohammed Latifsuccession:rent regulationN & D (London) Ltd v Gadsonsuccession:residence requirementIslington LBC v FreemanSheffield CC v WallHedgedale Ltd v Hardssuccession:same sex partnersSuccession to assured tenanciesSouthern Housing Group Ltd v NuttingFitzpatrick v Sterling Housing AssociationGhaidan v Godin-Mendozasuccession:secure tenanciesSuccession to secure tenanciesAustin v Southwark LBCBirmingham CC v WalkerWaltham Forest LBC v ThomasBassetlaw DC v RenshawBrent LBC v FofanaEpping Forest DC v PomphrettIslington LBC v FreemanMarsh v Lewisham LBCMichalak v Wandsworth LBCNewham LBC v PhillipsNewham LBC v RiaPeabody Donation Fund Governors v GrantSheffield CC v WallSheffield CC v Wall (No 2)Westminster CC v PeartSharp v Brent LBCsuccession:security of tenureSuccession to secure tenanciesAustin v Southwark LBCBirmingham CC v WalkerWaltham Forest LBC v ThomasBassetlaw DC v RenshawBrent LBC v FofanaEpping Forest DC v PomphrettIslington LBC v FreemanMarsh v Lewisham LBCMichalak v Wandsworth LBCNewham LBC v PhillipsNewham LBC v RiaPeabody Donation Fund Governors v GrantSheffield CC v WallSheffield CC v Wall (No 2)Westminster CC v PeartSuccession to assured tenanciesSouthern Housing Group Ltd v NuttingSuccession to Rent Act tenanciesCarega Properties SA v SharrattFitzpatrick v Sterling Housing AssociationGhaidan v Godin-MendozaBrock v WollamsChios Investment Property Co v LopezClore v MacNicolDaejan Properties Ltd v MahoneyHedgedale Ltd v HardsHildebrand v MoonSefton Holdings Ltd v CairnsSwanbrae Ltd v ElliottTennant v HuttonPortman Registrars v Mohammed LatifSharp v Brent LBCsuccession:spousesSuccession to assured tenanciessuccession:step childrenSheffield CC v Wall (No 2)succession:strangersCarega Properties SA v Sharrattsuccession:surrenderClore v MacNicolsuccession:survivorshipBirmingham CC v WalkerTennant v Huttonsuccession:temporary absencesSheffield CC v WallHedgedale Ltd v Hardssuccession:transfers by deceasedWaltham Forest LBC v Thomassuitability as tenantsR (Chowdhury) v Newham LBCGeneralsuitability of accommodation and homelessness:adaptions, assurances that work would be done onBoreh v Ealing LBCsuitability of accommodation and homelessness:affordabilitySuitability and out of area placementssuitability of accommodation and homelessness:babies, women withR v Newham LBC ex p Dadasuitability of accommodation and homelessness:bed and breakfastSuitability and out of area placementsCodona v Mid-Bedfordshire DCR v Newham LBC ex p Ojuri (No 3)suitability of accommodation and homelessness:continuing duty, asR (Zaher) v Westminster CCsuitability of accommodation and homelessness:damagesR v Ealing LBC ex p ParkinsonR (Morris) v Newham LBCsuitability of accommodation and homelessness:date of refusal, facts onSahardid v Camden LBCOsseily v Westminster CCsuitability of accommodation and homelessness:deferral of dutyR v Newham LBC ex p Begum (Mashuda)suitability of accommodation and homelessness:discharge of dutySuitability and out of area placementssuitability of accommodation and homelessness:enquiriesR v Sedgemoor DC ex p McCarthysuitability of accommodation and homelessness:exceptional circumstancesR (W) v Sheffield CCsuitability of accommodation and homelessness:family, proximity toSuitability and out of area placementsR (Yumsak) v Enfield LBCsuitability of accommodation and homelessness:Gypsies and TravellersCodona v Mid-Bedfordshire DCLee v Rhondda Cynon Taf CBCR (Maughan) v Leicester CCR (Price) v Carmarthenshire CCsuitability of accommodation and homelessness:housing benefit shortfallR v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Kaursuitability of accommodation and homelessness:injunctionsR (Khan) v Newham LBCsuitability of accommodation and homelessness:interim accommodationR (Flash) v Southwark LBCsuitability of accommodation and homelessness:Kurdish/Turkish community when applicant in fear of community,:perverse placement inR v Haringey LBC ex p Karamansuitability of accommodation and homelessness:long term but suitable for short term, accommodation not reasonable forBirmingham CC v Ali and Aweys; Moran v Manchester CCsuitability of accommodation and homelessness:medical factorsR v Lewisham LBC ex p Dolansuitability of accommodation and homelessness:one-bedroom flats for grandmother and grandsonR (Flash) v Southwark LBCsuitability of accommodation and homelessness:out of area placementsSuitability and out of area placementsR (Yumsak) v Enfield LBCR (W) v Sheffield CCsuitability of accommodation and homelessness:personal circumstancesR v Brent LBC ex p OmarR v Newham LBC ex p Ojuri (No 3)suitability of accommodation and homelessness:pregnant womenSuitability and out of area placementsR v Newham LBC ex p Dadasuitability of accommodation and homelessness:private and family life and home, right to respect forR (Morris) v Newham LBCR (Price) v Carmarthenshire CCR (Yumsak) v Enfield LBCsuitability of accommodation and homelessness:reasons for decisionsAkhtar v Birmingham CCsuitability of accommodation and homelessness:refusal of offers:homelessness reviewsSahardid v Camden LBCOsseily v Westminster CCsuitability of accommodation and homelessness:refusal of offers:reasonablenessSahardid v Camden LBCOsseily v Westminster CCsuitability of accommodation and homelessness:reviewsSahardid v Camden LBCOsseily v Westminster CCsuitability of accommodation and homelessness:social grounds, suitability onR v Lewisham LBC ex p Dolansuitability of accommodation and homelessness:substitution of own views by recordersWatson v Wandsworth LBCsuitability of accommodation and homelessness:support services, proximity toSuitability and out of area placementssuitability of accommodation and homelessness:WalesSuitability and out of area placementssuitable alternative accommodation :35 years, where tenants living in property forBattlespring Ltd v Gatessuitable alternative accommodation :appealsLee v Whitehousesuitable alternative accommodation :assured tenanciesLaimond Properties Ltd v Al-ShakarchiSuitable alternative accommodationsuitable alternative accommodation :buses, property unsuitable where tenant would have to wait much longer forRosemary Estates Ltd v Connollysuitable alternative accommodation :environment, relevance ofHill v RochardRedspring v FrancisSiddiqui v Rashidsuitable alternative accommodation :financial hardship of parties, balancingAmrit Holdings Co Ltd v Shahbakhtisuitable alternative accommodation :ground for possessionSuitable alternative accommodationAkram v AdamAmrit Holdings Co Ltd v ShahbakhtiFennbend Ltd v MillarHill v RochardJones v CookMontross Associated Investments v StoneMykolyshyn v NoahRedspring v FrancisSiddiqui v RashidYewbright Properties Ltd v StoneYoland Ltd v ReddingtonRosemary Estates Ltd v ConnollySuitable alternative accommodationBattlespring Ltd v GatesDawncar Investments Ltd v PlewsLee v WhitehouseMinchburn Estates Ltd v Fernandezsuitable alternative accommodation :injunctions to prevent tenants for disposing of property they ownedFennbend Ltd v Millarsuitable alternative accommodation :neighbourhood, differences inDawncar Investments Ltd v Plewssuitable alternative accommodation :part of existing accommodation could be alternative accommodationMykolyshyn v NoahYoland Ltd v Reddingtonsuitable alternative accommodation :possession ordersLaimond Properties Ltd v Al-ShakarchiSuitable alternative accommodationBattlespring Ltd v GatesDawncar Investments Ltd v PlewsLee v WhitehouseMinchburn Estates Ltd v Fernandezsuitable alternative accommodation :reasonableness of possession ordersSuitable alternative accommodationBattlespring Ltd v GatesDawncar Investments Ltd v PlewsLee v WhitehouseMinchburn Estates Ltd v Fernandezsuitable alternative accommodation :Rent Act tenanciesSuitable alternative accommodationsuitable alternative accommodation :secure tenanciesSuitable alternative accommodationsuitable alternative accommodation :similar property to type referred to in local authority certificatesJones v Cooksuitable alternative accommodation :standards of existing accommodation, relevance ofHill v Rochardsuitable alternative accommodation :time of orders, available atAkram v Adamsuitable alternative accommodation :views as not being a housing needMontross Associated Investments v Stonesuitable alternative accommodation :work, proximity toYewbright Properties Ltd v StoneRosemary Estates Ltd v ConnollysummonsesPatel v Smeatonsupport services, proximity toSuitability and out of area placementssurfacesHallisey v Petmoor Developments LtdIbrahim v Dovecorn Reversions Ltdsurrender:24 hours, tenants vacating flats forBolnore Properties Ltd v CobbsurrenderBarrett v MorganSurrenderAndré v RobinsonBasingstoke and Deane BC v PaiceBelcourt Estates Ltd v AdesinaBolnore Properties Ltd v CobbBone v BoneBrent LBC v Sharma and VyasCamden LBC v AlexandrouChamberlain v ScalleyClimping Park Ltd v BarrittFoster v RobinsonLaine v CadwalladerLeek and Moorlands Building Society v ClarkMattey Securities Ltd v ErvinPreston BC v FaircloughProudreed Ltd v Microgen Holdings plcSanctuary Housing Association v CampbellZionmor v Islington LBCCoker v London Rent Assessment Panelsurrender:absence, not implied byChamberlain v Scalleysurrender:acceptance of surrenderZionmor v Islington LBCsurrender:assignmentClore v MacNicolSanctuary Housing Association v BakerCamden LBC v Alexandrousurrender:assured tenanciesTruro Diocesan Board of Finance Ltd v Foleysurrender:contractual tenanciesTruro Diocesan Board of Finance Ltd v Foleysurrender:deedsSurrendersurrender:definitionSurrendersurrender:estoppelFoster v Robinsonsurrender:farm workers need no longer pay rent, agreements thatFoster v Robinsonsurrender:harassment and illegal eviction, damages forOdera v Iqbalsurrender:implied surrenderSanctuary Housing Association v BakerCoker v London Rent Assessment PanelR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Quigleysurrender:inequitable for parties to dispute termination, where it isBelcourt Estates Ltd v Adesinasurrender:joint tenantsLeek and Moorlands Building Society v Clarksurrender:keys, handing overBolnore Properties Ltd v CobbLaine v CadwalladerProudreed Ltd v Microgen Holdings plcZionmor v Islington LBCsurrender:leave premises owing rent, where tenantsPreston BC v Faircloughsurrender:letters from tenants regarding transfers of tenanciesBrent LBC v Sharma and Vyassurrender:licensees moving outBone v Bonesurrender:long absences with large arrearsChamberlain v Scalleysurrender:new accommodation, no surrender despite tenants indicating they hadOdera v Iqbalsurrender:new agreements, surrender of old agreements onClimping Park Ltd v Barrittsurrender:non-tenants, payment of rent byMattey Securities Ltd v Ervinsurrender:note to other tenants, tenants leavingSanctuary Housing Association v Campbellsurrender:notice to quitBarrett v Morgansurrender:offers of surrenderLaine v Cadwalladersurrender:one of joint tenantsLeek and Moorlands Building Society v Clarksurrender:operation of law, bySurrenderBelcourt Estates Ltd v AdesinaCamden LBC v Alexandrousurrender:oral surrenderSurrendersurrender:possession proceedings, quashing of decisions to bringCoker v London Rent Assessment Panelsurrender:Rent Act tenanciesTruro Diocesan Board of Finance Ltd v Foleysurrender:rent arrearsChamberlain v ScalleyMattey Securities Ltd v ErvinPreston BC v Faircloughsurrender:security of tenureR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Quigleysurrender:subtenants becoming tenants on surrenderBasingstoke and Deane BC v Paicesurrender:successionClore v MacNicolsurrender:unambiguous acts or series of actsAndré v RobinsonBelcourt Estates Ltd v AdesinasurveyorsHall v HowardD & F Estates Ltd v Church CommissionersSouthwark LBC v SimpsonCitibank Trust Ltd v AyivorsurvivorshipBirmingham CC v WalkerTennant v Huttonsuspended possession orders :55 years to pay of arrears, where it would takeTaj v Ali (No 1)suspended possession orders :appealsAdmiral Taverns (Cygnet) Ltd v Daniel and DalyEaling LBC v RichardsonTaj v Ali (No 2)Hyde Park Funding Ltd v IoannouLloyds TSB plc v Jayashankarsuspended possession orders :arrears, where no prospect of reducingAbbey National Mortgages v Bernardsuspended possession orders :breach of obligations as ground for possessionKensington and Chelsea RLBC v Simmondssuspended possession orders :change of circumstances, variation whereUjima Housing Association v Smithsuspended possession orders :children, control ofKnowsley Housing Trust v McMullensuspended possession orders :consent, suspending possession beyond limits byR v Ilkeston County Court ex p Kruzasuspended possession orders :discretionMcPhail v Persons UnknownVandermolen v Tomasuspended possession orders :effectChurch Commissioners for England v Al-Emarahsuspended possession orders :enforcementChurch Commissioners for England v Al-EmarahMortgage Agency Services v BalHyde Park Funding Ltd v IoannouLloyds TSB plc v Jayashankarsuspended possession orders :everyday practice, asHayman v Rowlandssuspended possession orders :exceptional circumstancesKnowsley Housing Trust v McMullensuspended possession orders :imprisonmentNew Charter Housing (North) Ltd v Ashcroftsuspended possession orders :indefinite suspension on payment of current rentVandermolen v Tomasuspended possession orders :injunctionsCanterbury CC v Lowesuspended possession orders :Matrimonial Homes Act 1983, transfer of tenancies underChurch Commissioners for England v Al-Emarahsuspended possession orders :money judgmentsCheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v GrattidgeCheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Johnsonsuspended possession orders :more than one occasion, discretion exercised onVandermolen v Tomasuspended possession orders :mortgage possession proceedingsHyde Park Funding Ltd v IoannouLloyds TSB plc v Jayashankarsuspended possession orders :mortgage possession proceedings:appeals after execution of warrantsHyde Park Funding Ltd v IoannouLloyds TSB plc v Jayashankarsuspended possession orders :mortgage possession proceedings:arrears, where no prospect of reducingAbbey National Mortgages v Bernardsuspended possession orders :mortgage possession proceedings:early sale, prospect ofTarget Home Loans v Clothiersuspended possession orders :mortgage possession proceedings:execution of warrantsMortgage Agency Services v BalHyde Park Funding Ltd v IoannouLloyds TSB plc v Jayashankarsuspended possession orders :mortgage possession proceedings:fixing period of timeRoyal Trust Co of Canada v Markhamsuspended possession orders :mortgage possession proceedings:general termsRoyal Trust Co of Canada v Markhamsuspended possession orders :mortgage possession proceedings:inherent jurisdictionCheltenham and Gloucester plc v Bookersuspended possession orders :mortgage possession proceedings:instalments, agreements to pay byRoyal Bank of Scotland v Elmessuspended possession orders :mortgage possession proceedings:money judgmentsCheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v GrattidgeCheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Johnsonsuspended possession orders :mortgage possession proceedings:mortgagors, tenants ofAbbey National plc v YusufNational Westminster Home Loans v Richessuspended possession orders :mortgage possession proceedings:no further applications, orders forAbbey National Building Society v Mewtonsuspended possession orders :mortgage possession proceedings:reasonable periodCheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Norgansuspended possession orders :mortgage possession proceedings:refusal to suspendCheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v FrascaHyde Park Funding Ltd v Ioannoususpended possession orders :mortgage possession proceedings:sale of propertyCheltenham and Gloucester plc v BookerTarget Home Loans v ClothierCheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Krauszsuspended possession orders :mortgage possession proceedings:terms of mortgageCentrax Trustees v Rosssuspended possession orders :notice requiring possessionNotice requiring possession (Housing Act 1988 s21)suspended possession orders :nuisance and annoyancePortsmouth CC v BryantKnowsley Housing Trust v McMullenNew Charter Housing (North) Ltd v Ashcroftsuspended possession orders :obvious orders to make, asLambeth LBC v Henrysuspended possession orders :outright ordersUjima Housing Association v SmithTaj v Ali (No 2)suspended possession orders :payment of current rent where no arrearsVandermolen v Tomasuspended possession orders :pointless, judges viewing suspension asNorwich CC v Famuyiwasuspended possession orders :reasonable periodCheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Norgansuspended possession orders :regret, where tenants show noNew Charter Housing (North) Ltd v Ashcroftsuspended possession orders :rehearings, injustice needed forEaling LBC v Richardsonsuspended possession orders :rent arrearsHayman v RowlandsLambeth LBC v HenryTaj v Ali (No 1)Vandermolen v Tomasuspended possession orders :sale of propertyCheltenham and Gloucester plc v BookerTarget Home Loans v ClothierCheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Krauszsuspended possession orders :trespassersMcPhail v Persons UnknownSwordheath Properties Ltd v Floyddsuspended possession orders :variationUjima Housing Association v Smithsuspended possession orders :wrong in principle, suspension notPortsmouth CC v Bryantsuspension of warrants before executionSuspension of warrants before executionBarnet LBC v HurleyR v Ilkeston County Court ex p KruzaStonebridge HAT v Gabbidonsuspension of warrants before execution:appeals, no further breaches prior to listing ofBarnet LBC v Hurleysuspension of warrants before execution:breachBarnet LBC v HurleyR v Ilkeston County Court ex p KruzaStonebridge HAT v Gabbidonsuspension of warrants before execution:consent, suspending possession beyond limits byR v Ilkeston County Court ex p Kruzasuspension of warrants before execution:county court, jurisdiction ofR v Ilkeston County Court ex p Kruzasuspension of warrants before execution:drug issuesStonebridge HAT v Gabbidonsuspension of warrants before execution:excluded spouses, breach caused byBarnet LBC v Hurleysuspension of warrants before execution:further suspensionsBarnet LBC v Hurleysuspension of warrants before execution:hearings, applications not heard prior toIslington LBC v Harridgesuspension of warrants before execution:jurisdictionR v Ilkeston County Court ex p Kruzasuspension of warrants before execution:postponement of possessionSuspension of warrants before executionsuspension of warrants before execution:Rent Act tenanciesSuspension of warrants before executionsuspension of warrants before execution:rent arrearsStonebridge HAT v Gabbidonsuspension of warrants before execution:secure tenanciesSuspension of warrants before executionsuspension of warrants before execution:security of tenureSuspension of warrants before executionsuspension of warrants before execution:spouses, breach caused by excludedBarnet LBC v HurleytaxEaton Square Properties Ltd v O’Higginstelephone:harassmentKhorasandjian v Bushtelephone:homelessness reviewsMakisi v Birmingham CC; Yosief v Birmingham CC; Nagi v Birmingham CCtemporary accommodation:appealsRichards v Greentemporary accommodation:armed conflictsWigley v Leightemporary accommodation:development, temporary use pendingTemporary use pending development (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 3)Attley v Cherwell DCHyde Housing Association Ltd v HarrisonLillieshall Road Housing Co-operative Ltd v Brennantemporary accommodation:disrepair, damages forEzekiel v McDadetemporary accommodation:homelessness, definition ofR v Brent LBC ex p Awuatemporary accommodation:intention to returnBrickfield Properties Ltd v Hughestemporary accommodation:long periodsOccupation as a residence; Rent Act 1977 s2(1)(a)Bevington v CrawfordBrickfield Properties Ltd v HughesGofor Investments v RobertsPrince v Robinsontemporary accommodation:occupation as a residenceOccupation as a residence; Rent Act 1977 s2(1)(a)Bevington v CrawfordBrickfield Properties Ltd v HughesGofor Investments v RobertsPrince v RobinsonRichards v GreenWigley v Leightemporary accommodation:Protection from Eviction Act 1977Mohamed v Manek and Kensington and Chelsea RLBCRogerson v Wigan MBCtemporary accommodation:subtenanciesHussey v Camden LBCtemporary accommodation:tuberculosis, due toWigley v Leightenant conditionOccupation as only or principal home: Housing Act 1985 s81 and Housing Act 1988 s1(1)(b); Prohibition against subletting: Housing Act 1985 s93 and Housing Act 1988 s15ATenant’s Charter, consultation ofHousing management and consultation (secure tenants)tenants in common, premises required forBostock v Tacher de la Pagerietermination of tenancies at common lawIntroductiontermination of tenancies at common law:forfeitureForfeitureBillson v Residential Apartments LtdAdagio Properties v AnsariBritish Petroleum Pension Trust v BehrendtCentral Estates (Belgravia) Ltd v Woolgar (No 2)Chrisdell Ltd v Johnson and TicknerCooper v HendersonCornillie v Saha and Bradford and Bingley Building SocietyCourtney Lodge Management Ltd v BlakeCroydon (Unique) Ltd v WrightEaton Square Properties Ltd v BeveridgeEscalus Properties Ltd v RobinsonHynes v Twinsectra LtdKhar v Delbounty LtdMaryland Estates v Bar-JosephPatel v K & J Restaurants LtdReichman v BeveridgeSavva v HousseinSinclair Gardens Investments (Kensington) v WalshSmith v SpaulSwordheath Properties Ltd v BoltThomas v Ken Thomas LtdAshton v SobelmanBillson v Residential Apartments Ltd (No 2)Church Commissioners for England v NodjoumiRendham Holdings Ltd v PatelSouthern Depot Co Ltd v British Railways BoardVan Haarlam v Kasner Charitable Trusttermination of tenancies at common law:surrenderBarrett v MorganSurrenderAndré v RobinsonBasingstoke and Deane BC v PaiceBelcourt Estates Ltd v AdesinaBolnore Properties Ltd v CobbBone v BoneBrent LBC v Sharma and VyasCamden LBC v AlexandrouChamberlain v ScalleyClimping Park Ltd v BarrittFoster v RobinsonLaine v CadwalladerLeek and Moorlands Building Society v ClarkMattey Securities Ltd v ErvinPreston BC v FaircloughProudreed Ltd v Microgen Holdings plcSanctuary Housing Association v CampbellZionmor v Islington LBCCoker v London Rent Assessment Panelterraces of flatsIbrahim v Dovecorn Reversions Ltdthreats of homelessnessReasonable to continue to occupy: s175(3)Threatened with homelessness: s175(4)threats to killNottingham CC v Cuttstime limits:agents or applications, notification of decisions toDharmaraj v Hounslow LBCtime limits:appealsR (Van der Stolk) v Camden LBCtime limits:assured shorthold tenanciesIntroductiontime limits:case statedLiverpool CC v Worthingtontime limits:consumer creditRahman v Sterling Credit Ltdtime limits:counterclaimsIslington LBC v KeaneRahman v Sterling Credit Ltdtime limits:court closed, whereAadan v Brent LBCVan Aken v Camden LBCtime limits:date of notification of original review, time running fromDemetri v Westminster CCtime limits:Defective Premises Act 1972Alderson v Beetham Organisation Ltdtime limits:delay, reasons forR (C) v Lewisham LBCtime limits:depositsDraycott and Draycott v Hannells Letting Limitedtime limits:disabled applicants having problems finding solicitorsBarrett v Southwark LBCtime limits:disrepairIslington LBC v KeaneMillington v Islington LBCtime limits:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings underLiverpool CC v Worthingtontime limits:extensionMillington v Islington LBCBradford and Bingley plc v RashidR (C) v Lewisham LBCR (Slaiman) v Richmond upon Thames LBCAdams v Southwark LBCAadan v Brent LBCBarrett v Southwark LBCShort v Birmingham CCtime limits:final day of limitsVan Aken v Camden LBCtime limits:homelessness decisions,:agents or applications, notification of decisions toDharmaraj v Hounslow LBCtime limits:homelessness decisions,:appealsAppeals: time limits, bringing an appeal and feesAadan v Brent LBCDemetri v Westminster CCDharmaraj v Hounslow LBCVan Aken v Camden LBCBarrett v Southwark LBCShort v Birmingham CCtime limits:homelessness decisions,:court closed, whereAadan v Brent LBCVan Aken v Camden LBCtime limits:homelessness decisions,:date of notification of original review, time running fromDemetri v Westminster CCtime limits:homelessness decisions,:disabled applicants having problems finding solicitorsBarrett v Southwark LBCtime limits:homelessness decisions,:extensionAadan v Brent LBCBarrett v Southwark LBCShort v Birmingham CCtime limits:homelessness decisions,:final day of limitsVan Aken v Camden LBCtime limits:homelessness decisions,:good reason or good causeBarrett v Southwark LBCShort v Birmingham CCtime limits:homelessness decisions,:judicial reviewR v Hillingdon LBC ex p Puhlhofertime limits:homelessness decisions,:reviewsR (C) v Lewisham LBCR (Slaiman) v Richmond upon Thames LBCAdams v Southwark LBCtime limits:interest, claims forBristol and West plc v BartlettScottish Equitable v Thompsontime limits:judicial reviewR v Hillingdon LBC ex p Puhlhofertime limits:merits of decision when extending time, no consideration ofR (Slaiman) v Richmond upon Thames LBCtime limits:mortgage possession proceedingsSecurum Finance Ltd v AshtonRahman v Sterling Credit LtdBradford and Bingley plc v RashidBristol and West plc v BartlettScottish Equitable v ThompsonWest Bromwich Building Society v Wilkinsontime limits:notice requiring possessionIntroductionNotice requiring possession (Housing Act 1988 s21)Elias v SpencerFernandez v McDonaldGracechurch International v Tribhovan and AbdulSingh v Emmanueltime limits:notice to quitManorlike Ltd v Le Vitas Travel AgencySchnabel v AllardPrecious v ReedieProtection from Eviction Act 1977 (civil provisions)time limits:personal injuryMillington v Islington LBCtime limits:prospects of successR (C) v Lewisham LBCtime limits:settlement, extended by offers ofBradford and Bingley plc v Rashidtime limits:squattersSwordheath Properties Ltd v Floyddtime limits:suspension of possession ordersSwordheath Properties Ltd v Floyddtime limits:trespassersSwordheath Properties Ltd v Floyddtime ordersConsumer Credit Act 1974Southern and District Finance plc v BarnesCedar Holdings v JenkinstitleBruton v London and Quadrant Housing Trusttoilets next to kitchensBirmingham CC v Oakleytolerated trespassersThe effect of possession orders – in generalTomlin ordersKahlon v Isherwoodtort:disrepairDelaware Mansions Ltd v City of WestminsterHunter v Canary Wharf LtdHabinteg Housing Association v JamesLambert v Barratt Homes Ltd and Rochdale MBCSharpe v Manchester MDCD & F Estates Ltd v Church CommissionersMcNerny v Lambeth LBCRimmer v Liverpool CCStevens v Blaenau Gwent CBCStockley v Knowsley MBCTargett v Torfaen BCLips v OlderWalker v Nottingham CCHawkins v Dhawantort:harassment and illegal evictionCivil proceedingstorture: prohibition ofArticle 3: Prohibition of torturetorture: prohibition of;Smirnova v Ukrainetransfers:allocationGeneralR (Ahmad) v Newham LBCR (Lin) v Barnet LBCtransfers:appeals, accommodation pendingFrancis v Kensington and Chelsea RLBCtransfers:county courtsFrancis v Kensington and Chelsea RLBCtransfers:Crown Estates Commissioners, transfer of property to housing associations byCrown Estate Commissioners v Governors of the Peabody Trusttransfers:domestic violenceR v Newham LBC ex p McIlroytransfers:homelessness, reasonable belief inR v Islington LBC ex p Btransfers:joint tenanciesGay v Sheerantransfers:letters from tenants regarding transfers of tenanciesBrent LBC v Sharma and Vyastransfers:parts of interestsGay v Sheerantransfers:pointsR (Lin) v Barnet LBCtransfers:prioritiesR (Ahmad) v Newham LBCtransfers:subtenanciesGay v Sheerantransfers:successionWaltham Forest LBC v Thomastransfers:urgent transfersR v Newham LBC ex p McIlroytransfers:violenceR v Newham LBC ex p McIlroytranslation of offer lettersAli v Birmingham CCtravel :affordabilityBegum (Nipa) v Tower Hamlets LBCtravel :buses, property unsuitable where tenant would have to wait much longer forRosemary Estates Ltd v Connollytravel :school, duration of travel time toWilliams v Birmingham CCtravel :suitable alternative accommodationRosemary Estates Ltd v Connollytravelling showsR v Chiltern DC ex p Robertstrees, highway authorities responsible for roots ofDelaware Mansions Ltd v City of Westminstertrespassers, injunctions:impossible to identify occupants, whereSouth Cambridgeshire DC v Gammell; Bromley LBC v Maughantrespassers, injunctions:intention to trespassHampshire Waste Services Ltd v Persons Unknowntrespassers, injunctions:intention to trespass by protestorsHampshire Waste Services Ltd v Persons Unknowntrespassers, injunctions:interim possession ordersIntroductiontrespassers, injunctions:landlords, liability ofCivil proceedingstrespassers, injunctions:licenseesManchester Airport plc v Duttontrespassers, injunctions:mesne profitsMesne profitsSwordheath Properties Ltd v Tabettrespassers, injunctions:named, no requirement for protestors to beHampshire Waste Services Ltd v Persons Unknowntrespassers, injunctions:possession claimsClaims for possession and injunctions against alleged trespassersCountryside Residential (North Thames) Ltd v TugwellManchester Airport plc v DuttonMcPhail v Persons UnknownSouth Cambridgeshire DC v Gammell; Bromley LBC v MaughanSwordheath Properties Ltd v FloyddWhitbread West Pennines Ltd v ReedyHampshire Waste Services Ltd v Persons UnknownR v Hillingdon LBC ex p McDonaghR v Leeds CC ex p MaloneyR v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food ex p CallaghanR (Casey) v Crawley BCtrespassers, injunctions:possession ordersMcPhail v Persons UnknownSwordheath Properties Ltd v FloyddWiltshire CC v Frazer (No 2)Admiral Taverns (Cygnet) Ltd v Daniel and Dalytrespassers, injunctions:postponement of possessionAdmiral Taverns (Cygnet) Ltd v Daniel and Dalytrespassers, injunctions:private and family life and home, right to respectHorie v UKtrespassers, injunctions:private and family life and home, right to respect forHorie v UKtrespassers, injunctions:reinstatement claimsWhitbread West Pennines Ltd v Reedytrespassers, injunctions:relevant matters, consideration of allR (Casey) v Crawley BCtrespassers, injunctions:squattersSwordheath Properties Ltd v Floyddtrespassers, injunctions:sufficient interest, claimants with right of access lackingCountryside Residential (North Thames) Ltd v Tugwelltrespassers, injunctions:suspension of possession ordersMcPhail v Persons UnknownSwordheath Properties Ltd v Floyddtrespassers, injunctions:time limitsSwordheath Properties Ltd v Floyddtrespassers, injunctions:tolerated trespassersThe effect of possession orders – in generaltrespassers, injunctions:unfair dismissalWhitbread West Pennines Ltd v Reedytrespassers, injunctions:unknown, against personsSouth Cambridgeshire DC v Gammell; Bromley LBC v MaughanHampshire Waste Services Ltd v Persons Unknowntrespassers, injunctions:unknown, injunctions against personsSouth Cambridgeshire DC v Gammell; Bromley LBC v Maughantrespassers, injunctions:use of forceClaims for possession and injunctions against alleged trespasserstrespassers, injunctions:writs of restitutionWiltshire CC v Frazer (No 2)trespassers:access, right ofCountryside Residential (North Thames) Ltd v Tugwelltrespassers:Civil Procedure RulesClaims for possession and injunctions against alleged trespasserstrespassers:close nexus between current and past occupiersWiltshire CC v Frazer (No 2)trespassers:common lawClaims for possession and injunctions against alleged trespasserstrespassers:control, right of access but no effectiveCountryside Residential (North Thames) Ltd v Tugwelltrespassers:damagesMesne profitsSwordheath Properties Ltd v Tabettrespassers:discretion to suspend possession ordersMcPhail v Persons Unknowntrespassers:employeesWhitbread West Pennines Ltd v ReedyR v Portsmouth CC ex p Knighttrespassers:exclusive possessionCivil proceedingstrespassers:former employeesWhitbread West Pennines Ltd v Reedytrespassers:government departments not under obligations owed by councilsR v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food ex p Callaghantrespassers:Gypsies and TravellersR v Leeds CC ex p MaloneyR v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food ex p CallaghanR (Casey) v Crawley BCtrespassers:harassment and illegal evictionPatel v W H Smith (Eziot) LtdCivil proceedingstrespassers:homeless personsR v Hillingdon LBC ex p McDonaghR v Portsmouth CC ex p Knighttrespassers:impossible to identify occupants, injunctions whereSouth Cambridgeshire DC v Gammell; Bromley LBC v Maughantrespassers:injunctionsHorie v UKSouth Cambridgeshire DC v Gammell; Bromley LBC v Maughantrespassers:injunctions:harassment and illegal evictionPatel v W H Smith (Eziot) Ltdtrial periods, duration ofIntroductory tenanciestrusts:beneficiariesGray v Taylortrusts:breachGreenwich LBC v McGradytrusts:joint tenantsGreenwich LBC v McGradytrusts:notice to quitGreenwich LBC v McGradytrusts:sale, breach of trusts forGreenwich LBC v McGradytuberculosisWigley v Leightwo separate units, provided inR v Hackney LBC ex p Tonnicodiunder-occupationDeath of tenantundertakings to carry out worksCourt orders and undertakings to carry out worksConnell v Hackney LBCMullen v Hackney LBCR v Wandsworth County Court ex p MunnRainbow Estates v Tokenhold LtdunemployedR (Mohamed) v Harrow LBCunfair contract termsSet-off and counterclaimCody v PhilpsKhatun, Zeb and Iqbal v Newham LBC and Office of Fair TradingUnfair contract terms - residential tenancy agreementsBrusse and de Man Garabito v Jahani BVunfair dismissalWhitbread West Pennines Ltd v Reedyurban living, conditions ofBrent LBC v Doughanurgent cases:allocationGeneralurgent cases:homelessnessHomeless as a result of an emergencyHiggs v Brighton and Hove CCNoble v South Herefordshire DCR v Bristol CC ex p Bradicurgent cases:injunctionsInterim injunctionsurgent cases:preferencesGeneraluse of forceClaims for possession and injunctions against alleged trespassersvacant possession:calculation of losses due to deprivation of vacant possessionShi v Jiangsu Native Produce Import & Export Corpvacant possession:exemplary damagesIslam v Yapvacant possession:forfeiturePatel v K & J Restaurants Ltdvacant possession:harassment and illegal eviction, damages forIslam v Yapvacant possession:imprisonment for failure to vacate premisesTrustee in Bankruptcy of Canty v Cantyvacant possession:mesne profitsShi v Jiangsu Native Produce Import & Export Corpvacant possession:possession orders, enforcement ofTrustee in Bankruptcy of Canty v CantyAnchor HA v Person Unknownvacant possession:private sectorPrivate sector leasing (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 6)Haringey LBC v HickeyTower Hamlets LBC v AbdiTower Hamlets LBC v MiahWestminster CC v Boraliuvacant possession:public landlords, leases of property toPrivate sector leasing (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 6)Haringey LBC v HickeyTower Hamlets LBC v AbdiTower Hamlets LBC v MiahWestminster CC v Boraliuvacant possession:reoccupation by different personsAnchor HA v Person Unknownvacant possession:subtenancies by public landlordsPrivate sector leasing (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 6)Haringey LBC v HickeyTower Hamlets LBC v AbdiTower Hamlets LBC v MiahWestminster CC v BoraliuvandalismR v Gloucester CC ex p Milesvariation of non-rent termsVariation of non-rent terms (secure tenants)Palmer v Sandwell MBCR (Kilby) v Basildon DCR v Brent LBC ex p Blattvariation of rent termsVariation of non-rent terms (secure tenants)Palmer v Sandwell MBCR (Kilby) v Basildon DCR v Brent LBC ex p Blattview accommodation, opportunity toKhatun, Zeb and Iqbal v Newham LBC and Office of Fair Tradingviews as not being a housing needMontross Associated Investments v Stoneviolence:availability of accommodationR v Westminster CC ex p Bishopviolence:homelessnessR v Newham LBC ex p CampbellR v Greenwich LBC ex p Pattersonviolence:lynch mob behaviour by tenantsTower Hamlets LBC v Longviolence:police protection, seekingR v Croydon LBC ex p Tothviolence:risk of violence in another area, duty to make enquiries as toR v Greenwich LBC ex p Pattersonviolence:settled accommodation and intentional homelessnessR v Newham LBC ex p Campbellviolence:urgent transfers, tenants could have stayed pendingR v Newham LBC ex p McIlroyvisitors, conduct ofCamden LBC v Gilsenanvulnerable persons:definition of vulnerabilityVulnerablevulnerable persons:drug addictionCrossley v Westminster CCvulnerable persons:enquiries, inadequacy ofBenson v Lewisham LBCvulnerable persons:facts, evaluation of all theCrossley v Westminster CCvulnerable persons:guidanceVulnerableShala v Birmingham CCvulnerable persons:homelessnessPriority needVulnerableAllison v Wandsworth LBCCrossley v Westminster CCMangion v Lewisham LBCR v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p KiharaShala v Birmingham CCSimms v Islington LBCR v Lambeth LBC ex p CarrollBenson v Lewisham LBCKelly v Westminster CCGriffiths v St Helens MBCvulnerable persons:institutionalised, whether prisoners have becomeKelly v Westminster CCvulnerable persons:manage own affairs, capacity toHijazi v Kensington and Chelsea RLBCR v Wirral MBC ex p Bellvulnerable persons:medical advisers, use ofShala v Birmingham CCSimms v Islington LBCvulnerable persons:medical evidenceAllison v Wandsworth LBCvulnerable persons:medical officers, opinions ofCrossley v Westminster CCvulnerable persons:other special reasonR v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p Kiharavulnerable persons:Pereira testVulnerablevulnerable persons:priority needPriority needVulnerableAllison v Wandsworth LBCCrossley v Westminster CCMangion v Lewisham LBCR v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p KiharaShala v Birmingham CCSimms v Islington LBCR v Lambeth LBC ex p CarrollBenson v Lewisham LBCKelly v Westminster CCvulnerable persons:prisoners not institutionalised, decisions thatKelly v Westminster CCvulnerable persons:severe disability for benefit purposes, assessment ofMangion v Lewisham LBCvulnerable persons:single men with health problems, inadequate enquiries aboutBenson v Lewisham LBCvulnerable persons:Wednesbury unreasonablenessKelly v Westminster CCWalesSuitability and out of area placementswalls:false wallsFincar SRL v 109/113 Mount Street Management Co Ltdwalls:outside wallsCampden Hill Towers Ltd v Gardnerwalls:structureSmedley v Chumley and Hawkes LtdCampden Hill Towers Ltd v GardnerFincar SRL v 109/113 Mount Street Management Co LtdHallisey v Petmoor Developments Ltdwalls:subsidenceSmedley v Chumley and Hawkes Ltdwarnings:applications for moves, consequences ofMuse v Brent LBCwarnings:exemplary damagesKeddey v Hugheswarnings:harassment and illegal eviction, damages forKeddey v Hugheswarnings:homelessnessMuse v Brent LBCVilvarasa v Harrow LBCwarnings:previous warningsVilvarasa v Harrow LBCwarnings:refusal of offersVilvarasa v Harrow LBCwashers, replacement ofIslington LBC v Keanewasted costs ordersR v Lambeth LBC ex p Wilsonwater:condensation exacerbated by water penetrationSwitzer v Lawwater:dampness from water penetrationLewis v Courtneywater:disrepairNiazi Services Ltd v Van der LooWycombe Area Health Authority v BarnettLewis v CourtneyO’Beirne v Lambeth LBCSwitzer v Lawwater:extractor fansSwitzer v Lawwater:hot water, loss of or noFerguson v Joneswater:joint tenants separately entitled to damages for water penetrationO’Beirne v Lambeth LBCwater:pressure due to works in other parts of buildingNiazi Services Ltd v Van der Loowater:ratesLewisham LBC v Simba-TolaLambeth LBC v Thomaswater:tanks, discolouration in oldSheldon v West Bromwich Corporationwater:turn off water, tenant’s failure toWycombe Area Health Authority v BarnettWater and sewerage servicesRochdale BC v DixonJones v Southwark LBCWater and sewerage services: re-sellerJones v Southwark LBCWednesbury unreasonablenessKelly v Westminster CCwill, tenancies atBanjo v Brent LBCwindows:broken glassLavimizadeh v Lambeth LBCwindows:children, injury toStevens v Blaenau Gwent CBCwindows:damagesLavimizadeh v Lambeth LBCFakhari v Newmanwindows:Defective Premises Act 1972Adams v Rhymney Valley DCwindows:disrepairStevens v Blaenau Gwent CBCLavimizadeh v Lambeth LBCFakhari v Newmanwindows:draughtsFakhari v Newmanwindows:locksStevens v Blaenau Gwent CBCwindows:standards at time of installationAdams v Rhymney Valley DCwithout prejudice correspondenceBradford and Bingley plc v Rashidwitnesses, wilful insults toManchester CC v McCannwomen’s refuges:discharge of dutyBirmingham CC v Ali and Aweys; Moran v Manchester CCwomen’s refuges:homelessnessR v Ealing LBC ex p SidhuBirmingham CC v Ali and Aweys; Moran v Manchester CCwriting:assured shorthold tenanciesBhopal v Waliawriting:creation of tenanciesBattersea Churches Housing Trust v Huntewriting:homelessnessReasonsDecisionswriting:invitation to treatBattersea Churches Housing Trust v Huntewriting:mortgage arrears, agreements onTarget Holdings Ltd v Priestleywriting:notice requiring possessionNotice requiring possession (Housing Act 1988 s21)writing:shamsBhopal v Waliayards as exteriorHopwood v Cannock Chase DC (formerly Rugeley UDC)