Our thanks to Colin Henderson for drawing to our attention the following passage from FAQs released following the LAA's recent provider reference group meetings: Can the LAA reconsider what level of additional financial information is asked for from passported clients? We have recently reviewed this and changed the evidence required to one month’s worth of bank statements in relation to civmeans 2 cases. We've also reminded caseworkers of the discretion available when dealing with applications from vulnerable clients, e.g. those who are homeless. We need to ask about third party finances where the client may be supported by a third party but, again, the caseworker should exercise discretion, taking the relevant circumstances into account. Reducing the evidence requirement from three to one month's worth of bank statements is welcome, as it should significantly reduce the bureaucracy and problems with obtaining evidence associated with legal aid applications. However, we would advise approaching it with some caution. The latest version of the means form itself (see page 13) still requires three months statements, not one. And experience suggests that changes of this type often take some time to filter down to front-line caseworkers. The safest approach would seem to be to submit three months where you can, and where you can't submit one month and quote the above passage.