Index

Index

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y

abandoned property
1. Kalas v Farmer
abatement notices
1. Budd v Colchester BC
2. R v Bristol CC ex p Everett
3. SFI Group plc v Gosport BC
4. Canterbury CC v Ferris
5. R (Anne) v Test Valley BC
abatement orders
1. Ashard v Islington LBC
abroad, accommodation situated :continued occupation, reasonableness of
1. Osei v Southwark LBC
2. R v Camden LBC ex p Aranda
3. R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Monaf
4. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Duro-Rama
5. R v Newham LBC ex p Ajayi
abroad, accommodation situated :employment prospects, consideration of
1. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Duro-Rama
abroad, accommodation situated :financial circumstances
1. R v Camden LBC ex p Aranda
abroad, accommodation situated :homelessness
1. Osei v Southwark LBC
2. R v Camden LBC ex p Aranda
3. R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Monaf
4. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Duro-Rama
5. R v Newham LBC ex p Ajayi
abroad, accommodation situated :national status, consideration of
1. R v Newham LBC ex p Ajayi
abroad, accommodation situated :overcrowding
1. Osei v Southwark LBC
abroad, accommodation situated :pattern of life, consideration of
1. R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Monaf
abroad, accommodation situated :reasons for coming to UK, considerations of
1. R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Monaf
abroad, accommodation situated :settled accommodation and intentional homelessness
1. R v Croydon LBC ex p Easom
abroad, accommodation situated :social history, consideration of
1. R v Newham LBC ex p Ajayi
abroad, accommodation situated :social security benefits, loss of
1. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Duro-Rama
abroad, persons from:allocation
1. General
abroad, persons from:categories
1. Eligibility
abroad, persons from:homelessness
1. Eligibility
2. R v Hillingdon LBC ex p Streeting
3. R v Westminster CC ex p Augustin
abroad, persons from:immigration control, persons subject to
1. Eligibility
2. Lekpo-Bozua v Hackney LBC
abroad, persons from:intentional homelessness
1. Din v Wandsworth LBC
abroad, persons from:lawfully in UK, duties owed to all persons
1. R v Hillingdon LBC ex p Streeting
abroad, persons from:Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002
1. Introduction
abroad, persons from:without accommodation, bringing family from abroad
1. R v Hillingdon LBC ex p Islam
absence from property:armed conflicts, absences due to
1. Wigley v Leigh
absence from property:family elsewhere, tenants living with
1. Regalian Securities Ltd v Scheuer
absence from property:hospital, tenants in
1. Hedgedale Ltd v Hards
absence from property:intention to return
1. Brickfield Properties Ltd v Hughes
2. Tickner v Hearn
absence from property:long periods, absence for
1. Occupation as a residence; Rent Act 1977 s2(1)(a)
2. Bevington v Crawford
3. Brickfield Properties Ltd v Hughes
4. Gofor Investments v Roberts
5. Prince v Robinson
6. Chamberlain v Scalley
absence from property:nights a week, staying in property only a few
1. Blanway Investments Ltd v Lynch
absence from property:occupation as a residence
1. Occupation as a residence; Rent Act 1977 s2(1)(a)
2. Hampstead Way Investments Ltd v Lewis-Weare
3. Bevington v Crawford
4. Blanway Investments Ltd v Lynch
5. Brickfield Properties Ltd v Hughes
6. Gofor Investments v Roberts
7. Prince v Robinson
8. Regalian Securities Ltd v Scheuer
9. Wigley v Leigh
absence from property:rent arrears, with
1. Chamberlain v Scalley
absence from property:sleep, use of flat just for
1. Hampstead Way Investments Ltd v Lewis-Weare
absence from property:subtenancies
1. Brent LBC v Cronin
2. Crawley BC v Sawyer
absence from property:succession
1. Sheffield CC v Wall
absence from property:surrender
1. Chamberlain v Scalley
abuse leading to psychological harm
1. Yemshaw v Hounslow LBC
abuse of process:disrepair
1. Henley v Bloom
abuse of process:mortgage possession proceedings
1. Securum Finance Ltd v Ashton
abuse of process:possession orders, setting aside
1. Hackney LBC v White
2. Setting aside warrants after execution
3. Camden LBC v Akanni
4. Hackney LBC v White
5. Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Hill
6. Jephson Homes HA v Moisejevs
accelerated possession procedure
1. Manel v Memon
access to property:Defective Premises Act 1972
1. McAuley v Bristol CC
2. Wadsworth v Nagle
access to property:improvements
1. Yeomans Row Management Ltd v Bodentien-Meyrick
access to property:nuisance, abatement of
1. Jones v Walsall MBC
access to property:repairs
1. Empson v Forde
2. Yeomans Row Management Ltd v Bodentien-Meyrick
access to property:trespassers
1. Countryside Residential (North Thames) Ltd v Tugwell
accommodation, definition of
1. ‘Accommodation’
2. R v Brent LBC ex p Awua
3. R v Ealing LBC ex p Sidhu
acoustic evidence
1. Lewisham LBC v Hall
acquiescence and homelessness:behaviour of others, acquiescence in
1. R v Nottingham CC ex p Caine
2. R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Khatun (Asma)
3. R v Eastleigh BC ex p Beattie (No 2)
4. R v North Devon DC ex p Lewis
5. R v Penwith DC ex p Trevena
6. R v Swansea CC ex p John
7. R v West Dorset DC ex p Phillips
acquiescence and homelessness:evidence
1. R v Eastleigh BC ex p Beattie (No 2)
2. R v West Dorset DC ex p Phillips
acquiescence and homelessness:intentional homelessness
1. Intentional homelessness
2. R v Nottingham CC ex p Caine
3. R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Khatun (Asma)
4. R v Eastleigh BC ex p Beattie (No 2)
5. R v North Devon DC ex p Lewis
6. R v Penwith DC ex p Trevena
7. R v Swansea CC ex p John
8. R v West Dorset DC ex p Phillips
acquiescence and homelessness:leave, not asking partners to
1. R v Swansea CC ex p John
acquiescence and homelessness:nuisance and annoyance
1. Griffiths v St Helens MBC
2. R v Swansea CC ex p John
acquiescence and homelessness:partners, consideration of applications by
1. R v North Devon DC ex p Lewis
acquiescence and homelessness:reconciliation with partner after termination of tenancies
1. R v Penwith DC ex p Trevena
acquiescence and homelessness:spouses leaving decisions to other spouse
1. R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Khatun (Asma)
acquiescence and homelessness:withholding rent, inferring partner knew that applicant was
1. R v Nottingham CC ex p Caine
adaptations:assurances that work will be done
1. Boreh v Ealing LBC
adaptations:disabled persons
1. Boreh v Ealing LBC
adaptations:homelessness
1. Boreh v Ealing LBC
adjournments of possession proceedings
1. Adjournments
2. Bates v Croydon LBC
3. Brent LBC v Aniedobe
4. Kingscastle Ltd v Owen-Owen
5. North Camden Housing Cooperative Ltd v O’Sullivan
6. Spitaliotis v Morgan
7. Verrilli v Idigoras
8. R v A Circuit Judge (sitting at Norwich County Court) ex p Wathen
adjournments of possession proceedings:appeals in other cases, pending outcomes of
1. Kingscastle Ltd v Owen-Owen
adjournments of possession proceedings:arrears, payment of
1. R v A Circuit Judge (sitting at Norwich County Court) ex p Wathen
2. Halifax plc v Taffs
3. Skandia Financial Services Ltd v Greenfield
adjournments of possession proceedings:committal proceedings
1. Stafford BC v Haynes
adjournments of possession proceedings:defence, refusal where there is no
1. North Camden Housing Cooperative Ltd v O’Sullivan
adjournments of possession proceedings:discretion
1. Milecastle Housing Ltd v Walton
adjournments of possession proceedings:evidence
1. Brent LBC v Aniedobe
2. Spitaliotis v Morgan
adjournments of possession proceedings:exceptional circumstances
1. North British Housing Association Limited v Matthews
adjournments of possession proceedings:execution of warrants
1. Cheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Obi
adjournments of possession proceedings:forfeiture, claims for
1. R v A Circuit Judge (sitting at Norwich County Court) ex p Wathen
adjournments of possession proceedings:injunctions
1. Stafford BC v Haynes
adjournments of possession proceedings:language difficulties
1. Verrilli v Idigoras
adjournments of possession proceedings:legal aid, to obtain
1. Bates v Croydon LBC
adjournments of possession proceedings:legal representation
1. Bates v Croydon LBC
2. Verrilli v Idigoras
adjournments of possession proceedings:mortgage possession proceedings:arrears, payment of
1. Halifax plc v Taffs
2. Skandia Financial Services Ltd v Greenfield
adjournments of possession proceedings:mortgage possession proceedings:execution of warrants
1. Cheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Obi
adjournments of possession proceedings:mortgage possession proceedings:limited power
1. Birmingham Citizens Permanent Building Society v Caunt
adjournments of possession proceedings:mortgage possession proceedings:reasonable period
1. First Middlesbrough Trading and Mortgage Co Ltd v Cunningham
2. Skandia Financial Services Ltd v Greenfield
adjournments of possession proceedings:new evidence, to consider
1. Brent LBC v Aniedobe
adjournments of possession proceedings:reasonable period
1. First Middlesbrough Trading and Mortgage Co Ltd v Cunningham
2. Skandia Financial Services Ltd v Greenfield
adjournments of possession proceedings:rebuttal evidence where landlords not taken by surprise
1. Spitaliotis v Morgan
adjournments of possession proceedings:rent arrears, payment of
1. North British Housing Association Limited v Matthews
2. Milecastle Housing Ltd v Walton
3. Lee-Steere v Jennings
4. R v A Circuit Judge (sitting at Norwich County Court) ex p Wathen
adjournments of possession proceedings:setting aside orders where refusal to adjourn
1. Lee-Steere v Jennings
adjournments of possession proceedings:unrepresented, where tenant
1. Verrilli v Idigoras
advice and assistance
1. General
2. R (Nipyo) v Croydon LBC
affordability :assessments
1. R v Brent LBC ex p Grossett
affordability :cheaper but unsettled accommodation, reasonableness of move to
1. R v Croydon LBC ex p Graham
affordability :continued occupation, reasonableness of
1. Reasonable to continue to occupy: s175(3)
2. R v Brent LBC ex p Baruwa
3. R v Brent LBC ex p Grossett
4. R v Croydon LBC ex p Graham
5. R v Wandsworth LBC ex p Hawthorne
6. R v Hillingdon LBC ex p Tinn
affordability :deliberate failure to pay rent
1. R v Brent LBC ex p Baruwa
affordability :homelessness
1. Reasonable to continue to occupy: s175(3)
2. R v Brent LBC ex p Baruwa
3. R v Brent LBC ex p Grossett
4. R v Croydon LBC ex p Graham
5. R v Wandsworth LBC ex p Hawthorne
6. R v Hillingdon LBC ex p Tinn
7. Mohamed v Westminster CC
8. Odunsi v Brent LBC
9. Suitability and out of area placements
affordability :necessities of life, paying for
1. R v Brent LBC ex p Baruwa
2. R v Hillingdon LBC ex p Tinn
affordability :rent
1. R v Brent LBC ex p Baruwa
2. R v Wandsworth LBC ex p Hawthorne
affordability :settled accommodation and intentional homelessness
1. Mohamed v Westminster CC
affordability :suitability of accommodation
1. Suitability and out of area placements
affordability :travel to accommodation
1. Begum (Nipa) v Tower Hamlets LBC
age of premises
1. McClean v Liverpool CC
2. Newham LBC v Patel
agents:commencement of possession proceedings
1. Chesters Accommodation Agency Ltd v Abebrese
agents:deposits
1. Draycott and Draycott v Hannells Letting Limited
agents:exemplary damages
1. Ramdath v Daley
agents:harassment and illegal eviction
1. Sampson v Wilson
2. Ramdath v Daley
agents:homelessness decisions, notification of decisions to
1. Dharmaraj v Hounslow LBC
agents:rent, tender of
1. Bessa Plus v Lancaster
agents:standing
1. Chesters Accommodation Agency Ltd v Abebrese
aggravated damages
1. Festusi Porbeni v Abdellaziz Chaabdiss
2. Asghar v Ahmed
3. Naveed v Raja
4. Rubio-Manzano v Ace Lettings and Pedonomou
agricultural employees :farm workers need no longer pay rent, agreements that
1. Foster v Robinson
agricultural employees :grounds for possession
1. Agricultural employees
2. Fowler v Minchin
3. Springfield Investments Ltd v Bell
agricultural employees :notices for possession, invalidity of
1. Fowler v Minchin
2. Springfield Investments Ltd v Bell
agricultural employees :Rent Act tenancies
1. Agricultural employees
agricultural employees :surrender
1. Foster v Robinson
agricultural holdings
1. Manorlike Ltd v Le Vitas Travel Agency
allocation of housing:abroad, persons from
1. General
allocation of housing:administrative practice
1. R (Faarah) v Southwark LBC
allocation of housing:adult children
1. R (Ariemuguvbe) v Islington LBC
allocation of housing:advice and assistance
1. General
allocation of housing:alternative accommodation
1. R (Adow) v Newham LBC
allocation of housing:anxiety and stress
1. Brown v Brent LBC
allocation of housing:appeals
1. General
allocation of housing:appropriate, allocation in manner council deems
1. General
allocation of housing:assessment of needs
1. General
allocation of housing:assumptions, irrationality and
1. R (Maali) v Lambeth LBC
allocation of housing:asylum seekers
1. General
allocation of housing:banding
1. R (Bauer-Czarnomski) v Ealing LBC
allocation of housing:causation
1. Davenport v Walsall MBC
allocation of housing:cockroach infestation
1. Ogunlowo v Southwark LBC
allocation of housing:compensation orders
1. Budd v Colchester BC
allocation of housing:condensation
1. Ogunlowo v Southwark LBC
allocation of housing:consent orders
1. R v Bloomsbury and Marylebone County Court ex p Blackburne
allocation of housing:date
1. R (Kabashi) v Redbridge LBC
allocation of housing:definition
1. General
allocation of housing:discretion
1. General
allocation of housing:drug convictions
1. Dixon v Wandsworth LBC
allocation of housing:eligible persons
1. General
2. R (Ariemuguvbe) v Islington LBC
3. Dixon v Wandsworth LBC
4. R (Kimvono) v Tower Hamlets LBC
allocation of housing:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under
1. Criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 and other Acts
2. Botross v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
3. Davenport v Walsall MBC
allocation of housing:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under:abatement orders, failure to comply with
1. Ashard v Islington LBC
allocation of housing:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under:causation
1. Davenport v Walsall MBC
allocation of housing:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under:costs
1. Davenport v Walsall MBC
allocation of housing:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under:date
1. R v Liverpool Crown Court ex p Cooke
allocation of housing:exclusions
1. General
2. R (Ariemuguvbe) v Islington LBC
allocation of housing:factors to be taken into account
1. General
allocation of housing:gravity of needs
1. R (Ahmad) v Newham LBC
allocation of housing:guidance
1. General
allocation of housing:guilty pleas
1. Davenport v Walsall MBC
allocation of housing:homeless persons:priority
1. General
allocation of housing:homeless persons:reasonable preference
1. R (Lin) v Barnet LBC
allocation of housing:households
1. R (Kimvono) v Tower Hamlets LBC
allocation of housing:individual circumstances, consideration of
1. R v Canterbury CC ex p Gillespie
allocation of housing:irrationality
1. R (Maali) v Lambeth LBC
allocation of housing:judicial review
1. General
allocation of housing:larger properties, start date based on date of re-assessment for
1. R (Kabashi) v Redbridge LBC
allocation of housing:medical advisers, opinions of
1. R (Bauer-Czarnomski) v Ealing LBC
allocation of housing:medical assessments
1. R (Adow) v Newham LBC
allocation of housing:multiple needs, assessment of
1. General
allocation of housing:notice, expiry of
1. R v Liverpool Crown Court ex p Cooke
allocation of housing:nullified by other factors, preferences as
1. R v Wolverhampton MBC ex p Watters
allocation of housing:outsourcing medical assessments
1. R (Adow) v Newham LBC
allocation of housing:points
1. R (Lin) v Barnet LBC
allocation of housing:possession orders
1. Dixon v Wandsworth LBC
allocation of housing:principles
1. Herbert v Lambeth LBC
allocation of housing:priorities/preferences
1. General
2. R (Faarah) v Southwark LBC
3. R (Kabashi) v Redbridge LBC
4. Reasonable preference
5. R (Ahmad) v Newham LBC
6. R v Wolverhampton MBC ex p Watters
7. R (Lin) v Barnet LBC
8. R (Babakandi) v Westminster CC
allocation of housing:procedure
1. R (Lin) v Barnet LBC
allocation of housing:quantum
1. Davenport v Walsall MBC
allocation of housing:quota system, operation of an ad hoc
1. R (Babakandi) v Westminster CC
allocation of housing:re-assessment for larger properties, start date based on date of
1. R (Kabashi) v Redbridge LBC
allocation of housing:reasonable preference
1. General
2. R (Kabashi) v Redbridge LBC
3. Reasonable preference
4. R (Ahmad) v Newham LBC
5. R v Wolverhampton MBC ex p Watters
6. R (Lin) v Barnet LBC
7. R (Babakandi) v Westminster CC
allocation of housing:rent arrears
1. R v Wolverhampton MBC ex p Watters
2. R (Babakandi) v Westminster CC
allocation of housing:sale, after
1. Clements v Simmonds
allocation of housing:schemes
1. General
2. R (Ariemuguvbe) v Islington LBC
3. R (Ahmad) v Newham LBC
4. R (Lin) v Barnet LBC
5. R (Babakandi) v Westminster CC
allocation of housing:single route into social housing
1. General
allocation of housing:statutory categories of preference
1. General
allocation of housing:suitability as tenants
1. General
allocation of housing:suspension from bidding
1. R (Babakandi) v Westminster CC
allocation of housing:transfers
1. General
2. R (Ahmad) v Newham LBC
3. R (Lin) v Barnet LBC
allocation of housing:unlawful, unpublished administrative practice as
1. R (Faarah) v Southwark LBC
allocation of housing:void, allocations made outside scheme as not being
1. Birmingham CC v Qasim
allocation to tracks
1. Birmingham CC v Lee
Almshouses
1. Gray v Taylor
2. Watts v Stewart
alternative accommodation:allocation
1. R (Adow) v Newham LBC
alternative accommodation:delay
1. Office public d’habitation de la Ville de Paris v Yedei
alternative accommodation:disrepair
1. Lubren v Lambeth LBC
2. McGreal v Wake
alternative accommodation:evidence of attempts by tenants
1. Alexander v Mohamadzadeh
alternative accommodation:hardship
1. Baker v MacIver
alternative accommodation:homelessness
1. Muse v Brent LBC
alternative accommodation:judicial notice of problems finding furnished accommodation
1. Bassett v Fraser
alternative accommodation:landlords finding accommodation, prospect of
1. Coombes v Parry
alternative accommodation:landlords or members of family, premises required for
1. Alexander v Mohamadzadeh
2. Baker v MacIver
3. Bassett v Fraser
4. Coombes v Parry
alternative accommodation:nuisance or annoyance
1. Darlington BC v Sterling
alternative accommodation:private and family life and home, right to respect for
1. Office public d’habitation de la Ville de Paris v Yedei
alternative accommodation:prospect of finding accommodation
1. Baker v MacIver
2. Bassett v Fraser
3. Coombes v Parry
alternative accommodation:redecoration after affairs
1. McGreal v Wake
anxiety and stress, compensation for
1. Brown v Brent LBC
apologies
1. R (Bernard) v Enfield LBC
appeals
1. Appeals
2. Ealing LBC v Richardson
3. Law Land v Sinclair
4. Moat Housing Group South Ltd v Harris and Hartless
5. Taj v Ali (No 2)
appeals:allocation
1. General
appeals:Civil Procedure Rules
1. Appeals
appeals:county courts
1. Plymouth CC v Hoskin
2. R v Mansfield DC ex p Ashfield Nominees
appeals:court managers refusal to accept appeals
1. Gwynedd CC v Grunshaw
appeals:Court of Appeal, role of
1. Bracknell Forest BC v Green
appeals:delivery to court
1. Gwynedd CC v Grunshaw
appeals:disrepair, damages for
1. Brent LBC v Carmel (sued as Murphy)
2. Davies v Peterson
appeals:drugs, conspiracy to supply
1. Knowsley Housing Trust v Prescott
appeals:further evidence
1. Lee-Steere v Jennings
appeals:grounds for possession
1. Bracknell Forest BC v Green
appeals:hearsay
1. Anti-social behaviour (Housing Acts 1985 and 1988)
appeals:injunctions
1. Medina Housing Association v Connolly
appeals:jurisdiction
1. Admiral Taverns (Cygnet) Ltd v Daniel and Daly
appeals:listing, no further breaches before
1. Barnet LBC v Hurley
appeals:mortgage possession proceedings
1. Hyde Park Funding Ltd v Ioannou
2. Lloyds TSB plc v Jayashankar
appeals:new material not sufficiently unexpected, where
1. Taj v Ali (No 2)
appeals:nominal damages
1. Davies v Peterson
appeals:notice of appeal hopeless, striking out confined to where
1. Law Land v Sinclair
appeals:notice requiring possession
1. Barker v Hands
appeals:nuisance or annoyance
1. Anti-social behaviour (Housing Acts 1985 and 1988)
2. CDS Housing v Bellis
3. Matthews v Ahmed
4. Knowsley Housing Trust v Prescott
appeals:occupation as a residence
1. Richards v Green
appeals:outright order made by Court of Appeal, tenants only taking matter seriously when
1. Taj v Ali (No 2)
appeals:permission
1. Barker v Hands
2. Brent LBC v Carmel (sued as Murphy)
appeals:possession orders:county court, continuing remedies in
1. Plymouth CC v Hoskin
appeals:possession orders:enforcement of
1. Admiral Taverns (Cygnet) Ltd v Daniel and Daly
appeals:possession orders:postponement
1. Knowsley Housing Trust v Prescott
appeals:possession orders:second appeals, no compelling reason for
1. Plymouth CC v Hoskin
appeals:possession orders:setting aside
1. Setting aside possession orders
appeals:possession orders:suspension
1. Taj v Ali (No 2)
2. Hyde Park Funding Ltd v Ioannou
3. Lloyds TSB plc v Jayashankar
appeals:possession proceedings
1. Kingscastle Ltd v Owen-Owen
2. Appeals
3. Ealing LBC v Richardson
4. Law Land v Sinclair
5. Moat Housing Group South Ltd v Harris and Hartless
6. Taj v Ali (No 2)
appeals:prejudice
1. Moat Housing Group South Ltd v Harris and Hartless
appeals:public health and environmental protection
1. Gwynedd CC v Grunshaw
2. R v Mansfield DC ex p Ashfield Nominees
appeals:rehearings
1. Bracknell Forest BC v Green
2. Ealing LBC v Richardson
appeals:rent arrears
1. Lee-Steere v Jennings
appeals:second appeals, no compelling reason for
1. Plymouth CC v Hoskin
appeals:stay of possession proceedings pending appeal
1. Moat Housing Group South Ltd v Harris and Hartless
appeals:striking out
1. Law Land v Sinclair
appeals:suitable alternative accommodation
1. Lee v Whitehouse
appeals:suspension of possession orders
1. Admiral Taverns (Cygnet) Ltd v Daniel and Daly
2. Ealing LBC v Richardson
3. Taj v Ali (No 2)
4. Hyde Park Funding Ltd v Ioannou
5. Lloyds TSB plc v Jayashankar
appeals:suspension of warrants before execution
1. Barnet LBC v Hurley
arbitration
1. Ahmed v Southwark LBC
armed conflicts, absences due to
1. Wigley v Leigh
armed forces
1. Ministry of Defence v Ashman
2. Ministry of Defence v Thompson
3. Shi v Jiangsu Native Produce Import & Export Corp
arrest
1. Anti-social behaviour
Article 1 of Protocol 1 with Article 14 discrimination
1. Vrountou v Cyprus
Article 1 of Protocol 1 with Article 14 discrimination: interference with
1. Alentseva v Russia
2. Aquilina v Malta
assault
1. Naveed v Raja
2. Rubio-Manzano v Ace Lettings and Pedonomou
assessment of needs :allocation
1. General
assessment of needs :breach of tenancies
1. Peabody Donation Fund v Higgins
assessment of needs :consent
1. Sanctuary Housing Association v Baker
2. Pazgate Ltd v McGrath
assessment of needs :false statements
1. Islington LBC v Uckac
assessment of needs :forfeiture
1. Church Commissioners for England v Nodjoumi
assessment of needs :fraud
1. Sanctuary Housing Association v Baker
assessment of needs :homelessness
1. R (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
assessment of needs :implied surrender
1. Sanctuary Housing Association v Baker
assessment of needs :intention
1. Camden LBC v Goldenberg
assessment of needs :joint tenants
1. Burton v Camden LBC
assessment of needs :misrepresentation
1. Islington LBC v Uckac
assessment of needs :move elsewhere if opportunity arose, not displaced by
1. Camden LBC v Goldenberg
assessment of needs :multiple needs
1. General
assessment of needs :mutual exchanges, right to
1. Burton v Camden LBC
assessment of needs :possession orders
1. Croydon LBC v Buston and Triance
assessment of needs :properly assigned, tenant unable to show tenancy
1. Croydon LBC v Buston and Triance
assessment of needs :rent arrears
1. Notting Hill Housing Trust v Jones
assessment of needs :residence test
1. Camden LBC v Goldenberg
assessment of needs :security of tenure
1. Assignments (secure tenants)
2. Burton v Camden LBC
3. Camden LBC v Goldenberg
4. Croydon LBC v Buston and Triance
5. Peabody Donation Fund v Higgins
6. Sanctuary Housing Association v Baker
assessment of needs :subtenancies
1. Pazgate Ltd v McGrath
assessment of needs :succession
1. Sanctuary Housing Association v Baker
assessment of needs :surrender
1. Sanctuary Housing Association v Baker
2. Camden LBC v Alexandrou
assured shorthold tenancies:28 February, tenancies granted on or after
1. Requirements for assured shorthold tenancy
assured shorthold tenancies
1. Introduction
assured shorthold tenancies:accelerated possession procedure
1. Manel v Memon
assured shorthold tenancies:assured tenancies
1. Andrews v Cunningham
assured shorthold tenancies:business tenancies
1. Andrews v Brewer
assured shorthold tenancies:continued occupation, reasonableness of
1. R v Croydon LBC ex p Jarvis
assured shorthold tenancies:deposits
1. Tenancy deposits and the Housing Act 2004
2. UK Housing Alliance (North West) Ltd v Francis
3. Draycott and Draycott v Hannells Letting Limited
assured shorthold tenancies:documents, rigorous consideration of
1. Manel v Memon
assured shorthold tenancies:fixed terms
1. Introduction
2. Requirements for assured shorthold tenancy
assured shorthold tenancies:formalities
1. Requirements for assured shorthold tenancy
assured shorthold tenancies:grounds for possession
1. Introduction
assured shorthold tenancies:higher rent, written agreements for
1. Bhopal v Walia
assured shorthold tenancies:homelessness
1. R v Croydon LBC ex p Jarvis
2. Knight v Vale Royal BC
3. Griffiths v St Helens Council
assured shorthold tenancies:notice requiring possession
1. Introduction
2. Notice requiring possession (Housing Act 1988 s21)
3. Aylward v Fawaz
4. Barker v Hands
5. Church Commissioners for England v Meya
6. Elias v Spencer
7. Fernandez v McDonald
8. Gracechurch International v Tribhovan and Abdul
9. Lower Street Properties v Jones
10. Notting Hill Housing Trust v Roomus
11. Singh v Emmanuel
assured shorthold tenancies:orally, tenancies granted
1. Requirements for assured shorthold tenancy
assured shorthold tenancies:possession proceedings
1. Introduction
assured shorthold tenancies:rent arrears
1. Rent arrears
assured shorthold tenancies:rent assessment committees
1. Park Lane Properties Ltd v Northern Rent Assessment Committee
assured shorthold tenancies:rent books
1. Andrews v Cunningham
assured shorthold tenancies:rent regulation
1. Park Lane Properties Ltd v Northern Rent Assessment Committee
assured shorthold tenancies:section 20 notices
1. Requirements for assured shorthold tenancy
assured shorthold tenancies:security of tenure
1. Introduction
assured shorthold tenancies:separate dwelling, let as a
1. Andrews v Brewer
assured shorthold tenancies:shams
1. Bhopal v Walia
assured shorthold tenancies:time limits
1. Introduction
assured shorthold tenancies:Tomlin orders, schedule for execution of AST in
1. Kahlon v Isherwood
assured shorthold tenancies:written agreements
1. Bhopal v Walia
assured tenancies: rent regulation
1. Chouhan v The Earl’s High School
2. Preston v Area Estates Ltd and London Rent Assessment Panel
assured tenancies:assured shorthold tenancies
1. Andrews v Cunningham
2. Bhopal v Walia
assured tenancies:board and attendance
1. Board and attendance
assured tenancies:breach of obligations as ground for possession
1. Breach of obligation
2. Breach of obligation (Housing Act 1988 Sch 2 Ground 12)
3. Pollards Hill HA v Marsh
4. Sanctuary Housing Association v Baker (No 2)
assured tenancies:business tenancies
1. Business tenancies (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 11, Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 4 and Rent Act 1977 s24)
2. Broadway Investments Hackney Ltd v Grant
3. Cheryl Investments Ltd v Saldanha
4. Gurton v Parrott
5. Lewis v Weldcrest Ltd
6. Pulleng v Curran
7. Tan v Sitkowski
8. Wagle v Trustees of Henry Smith’s Charity Kensington Estate
9. Wright v Mortimer
assured tenancies:company lets
1. Company lets
assured tenancies:continuation of tenancies
1. The effect of possession orders – in general
assured tenancies:contractual tenancies, surrender of
1. Truro Diocesan Board of Finance Ltd v Foley
assured tenancies:Crown Estates Commissioners, transfer of property to housing associations by
1. Crown Estate Commissioners v Governors of the Peabody Trust
assured tenancies:death of tenants
1. Death of tenant
assured tenancies:demolition or redevelopment, property required for
1. Property required for demolition or redevelopment
assured tenancies:employees, licences for
1. Licences – occupation granted to employees
assured tenancies:false statements
1. Tenancy obtained by false statement
assured tenancies:former employees
1. Former employees
assured tenancies:grounds for possession
1. Introduction
2. Owner-occupiers
3. Returning owner-occupier (Housing Act 1988 Sch 2 Ground 1)
4. Boyle v Verrall
5. Hegab v Shamash
6. Mustafa v Ruddock
assured tenancies:harassment and illegal eviction, damages for
1. Cashmere v Walsh, Downing and Veale
2. Grillo v Cant and Bassairi Ltd
assured tenancies:high or low rent, tenancies at a
1. Tenancies at a high or low rent (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 paras 2 and 3 and Rent Act 1977 ss4–5)
2. Bostock v Bryant and Another
assured tenancies:holiday lets
1. Holiday lets (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 9 and Rent Act 1977 s9)
2. Buchmann v May
3. Killick v Roberts
4. R v Rent Officer for Camden LBC ex p Plant
5. McHale v Daneham
assured tenancies:housing associations
1. Assured tenancy transitional provisions
2. Crown Estate Commissioners v Governors of the Peabody Trust
assured tenancies:introductory tenancies
1. Introductory tenancies
assured tenancies:licences
1. Licences – occupation granted to employees
assured tenancies:new tenancies remain protected
1. Kotecha v Rimington
assured tenancies:notice to quit
1. Subletting the whole of premises
assured tenancies:nuisance or annoyance
1. Anti-social behaviour
2. Raglan Housing Association Ltd v Fairclough
3. Kensington Housing Trust v Borkwood
assured tenancies:occupation as a residence
1. Occupation as a residence; Rent Act 1977 s2(1)(a)
assured tenancies:only or principal home, occupation as
1. Occupation as only or principal home: Housing Act 1985 s81 and Housing Act 1988 s1(1)(b); Prohibition against subletting: Housing Act 1985 s93 and Housing Act 1988 s15A
2. Brent LBC v Cronin
3. Crawley BC v Sawyer
4. Gay v Sheeran
5. Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Clarke
6. Hussey v Camden LBC
7. Jennings v Epping Forest DC
8. Lambeth LBC v Vandra
9. Merton LBC v Salama
10. Muir Group Housing Association Ltd v Thornley
11. Sutton LBC v Swann
12. Ujima Housing Association v Ansah
13. Amoah v Barking and Dagenham LBC
14. Waltham Forest CBHA v Fanning
15. Notting Hill Housing Trust v Etoria
16. McLoughlin’s Curator Bonis v Motherwell DC
assured tenancies:owner-occupiers and grounds for possession
1. Owner-occupiers
2. Returning owner-occupier (Housing Act 1988 Sch 2 Ground 1)
3. Boyle v Verrall
4. Hegab v Shamash
5. Mustafa v Ruddock
assured tenancies:possession orders
1. Laimond Properties Ltd v Al-Shakarchi
2. Introduction and general considerations
3. The effect of possession orders – in general
4. Setting aside warrants after execution
assured tenancies:prior to Housing Act 1988, tenant not protected
1. Secretarial Nominee Co Ltd v Thomas
assured tenancies:rent
1. Rent regulation (assured tenants)
2. Riverside Housing Association Ltd v White
3. Bankway Properties v Dunsford
4. Contour Homes Ltd v Rowen
5. Hughes v Borodex Ltd
6. R (Lester) v London Rent Assessment Committee
7. R (Morris) v London Rent Assessment Committee
8. Tadema Holdings v Ferguson
9. Earl of Cadogan v Chehab
10. Ghani v London Rent Assessment Committee
11. London District Properties Management Ltd v Goolamy
12. N & D (London) Ltd v Gadson
13. R v London Rent Assessment Panel ex p Cadogan Estates
14. R (Innes) v Northern Rent Assessment Panel
15. Rowe v South West Rent Assessment Panel
assured tenancies:Rent Act tenancies
2. Assured tenancy transitional provisions
4. Laimond Properties Ltd v Al-Shakarchi
6. Rajah v Arogol Co Ltd
8. Secretarial Nominee Co Ltd v Thomas
10. Truro Diocesan Board of Finance Ltd v Foley
12. Crown Estate Commissioners v Governors of the Peabody Trust
13. Swanbrae Ltd v Ryder
15. Goringe v Twinsectra Ltd
17. Kotecha v Rimington
assured tenancies:rent arrears
1. Rent arrears (Housing Act 1988 Sch 2 Grounds 8, 10 and 11)
2. Artesian Residential Investments Ltd v Beck
3. Baygreen Properties Ltd v Gil
4. Bessa Plus v Lancaster
5. Capital Prime Plus plc v Wills
6. Day v Coltrane
7. Leadenhall Residential 2 Ltd v Stirling
8. North British Housing Association Limited v Matthews
9. R (Weaver) v London & Quadrant Housing Trust
10. Diab v Countrywide Rentals 1 plc
11. Etherington v Burt
12. Milecastle Housing Ltd v Walton
assured tenancies:rent books, use of words on
1. Andrews v Cunningham
assured tenancies:rent regulation
1. Rent regulation (assured tenants)
2. Riverside Housing Association Ltd v White
3. Bankway Properties v Dunsford
4. Contour Homes Ltd v Rowen
5. Hughes v Borodex Ltd
6. R (Lester) v London Rent Assessment Committee
7. R (Morris) v London Rent Assessment Committee
8. Tadema Holdings v Ferguson
9. Earl of Cadogan v Chehab
10. Ghani v London Rent Assessment Committee
11. London District Properties Management Ltd v Goolamy
12. N & D (London) Ltd v Gadson
13. R v London Rent Assessment Panel ex p Cadogan Estates
14. R (Innes) v Northern Rent Assessment Panel
15. Rowe v South West Rent Assessment Panel
assured tenancies:resident landlords
1. Resident landlords (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 10 and Rent Act 1977 s12)
2. Bardrick v Haycock
3. Barnes v Goresuch
4. Cooper v Tait
5. Griffiths v English
6. Jackson v Pekic
7. Lewis-Graham v Conacher
8. O’Sullivan v Barnett
9. Palmer v McNamara
10. Wolff v Waddington
assured tenancies:same or substantially the same premises
1. Rajah v Arogol Co Ltd
2. Goringe v Twinsectra Ltd
assured tenancies:Scotland
1. Laimond Properties Ltd v Al-Shakarchi
assured tenancies:secure tenancies
1. Assured tenancy transitional provisions
assured tenancies:security of tenure:board and attendance
1. Board and attendance
assured tenancies:security of tenure:business tenancies
1. Business tenancies (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 11, Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 4 and Rent Act 1977 s24)
2. Broadway Investments Hackney Ltd v Grant
3. Cheryl Investments Ltd v Saldanha
4. Gurton v Parrott
5. Lewis v Weldcrest Ltd
6. Pulleng v Curran
7. Tan v Sitkowski
8. Wagle v Trustees of Henry Smith’s Charity Kensington Estate
9. Wright v Mortimer
assured tenancies:security of tenure:definition
1. Introduction
assured tenancies:security of tenure:exceptions
1. Introduction
2. Business tenancies (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 11, Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 4 and Rent Act 1977 s24)
3. Broadway Investments Hackney Ltd v Grant
4. Cheryl Investments Ltd v Saldanha
5. Gurton v Parrott
6. Lewis v Weldcrest Ltd
7. Pulleng v Curran
8. Tan v Sitkowski
9. Wagle v Trustees of Henry Smith’s Charity Kensington Estate
10. Wright v Mortimer
11. Holiday lets (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 9 and Rent Act 1977 s9)
12. Buchmann v May
13. Killick v Roberts
14. R v Rent Officer for Camden LBC ex p Plant
15. McHale v Daneham
assured tenancies:security of tenure:high or low rent, tenancies at a
1. Tenancies at a high or low rent (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 paras 2 and 3 and Rent Act 1977 ss4–5)
2. Bostock v Bryant and Another
assured tenancies:security of tenure:holiday lets
1. Holiday lets (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 9 and Rent Act 1977 s9)
2. Buchmann v May
3. Killick v Roberts
4. R v Rent Officer for Camden LBC ex p Plant
5. McHale v Daneham
assured tenancies:security of tenure:only or principal home, occupation as
1. Occupation as only or principal home: Housing Act 1985 s81 and Housing Act 1988 s1(1)(b); Prohibition against subletting: Housing Act 1985 s93 and Housing Act 1988 s15A
2. Brent LBC v Cronin
3. Crawley BC v Sawyer
4. Gay v Sheeran
5. Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Clarke
6. Hussey v Camden LBC
7. Jennings v Epping Forest DC
8. Lambeth LBC v Vandra
9. Merton LBC v Salama
10. Muir Group Housing Association Ltd v Thornley
11. Sutton LBC v Swann
12. Ujima Housing Association v Ansah
13. Amoah v Barking and Dagenham LBC
14. Waltham Forest CBHA v Fanning
15. Notting Hill Housing Trust v Etoria
16. McLoughlin’s Curator Bonis v Motherwell DC
assured tenancies:security of tenure:rent
1. Rent regulation (assured tenants)
2. Riverside Housing Association Ltd v White
3. Bankway Properties v Dunsford
4. Contour Homes Ltd v Rowen
5. Hughes v Borodex Ltd
6. R (Lester) v London Rent Assessment Committee
7. R (Morris) v London Rent Assessment Committee
8. Tadema Holdings v Ferguson
9. Earl of Cadogan v Chehab
10. Ghani v London Rent Assessment Committee
11. London District Properties Management Ltd v Goolamy
12. N & D (London) Ltd v Gadson
13. R v London Rent Assessment Panel ex p Cadogan Estates
14. R (Innes) v Northern Rent Assessment Panel
15. Rowe v South West Rent Assessment Panel
assured tenancies:security of tenure:resident landlords
1. Resident landlords (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 10 and Rent Act 1977 s12)
2. Bardrick v Haycock
3. Barnes v Goresuch
4. Cooper v Tait
5. Griffiths v English
6. Jackson v Pekic
7. Lewis-Graham v Conacher
8. O’Sullivan v Barnett
9. Palmer v McNamara
10. Wolff v Waddington
assured tenancies:security of tenure:separate dwelling, let as a
1. Let as a separate dwelling
2. Goodrich v Paisner
3. Uratemp Ventures Ltd v Collins
4. Westminster CC v Clarke
5. Gray v Brown
6. Grosvenor Estates Belgravia v Cochran
7. Horford Investments v Lambert
8. Kavanagh v Lyroudias
9. Mansfield DC v Langridge
10. Miller v Eyo
11. Mortgage Corporation v Ubah
12. Parkins v Westminster CC
13. St Catherine’s College v Dorling
14. Tyler v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
15. R v Rent Officer of Nottinghamshire Registration Area ex p Allen
16. Andrews v Brewer
17. Tomkins v Basildon DC
18. Webb v Barnet LBC
assured tenancies:security of tenure:succession
1. Succession to assured tenancies
2. Southern Housing Group Ltd v Nutting
assured tenancies:security of tenure:transitional provisions
1. Assured tenancy transitional provisions
2. Laimond Properties Ltd v Al-Shakarchi
3. Rajah v Arogol Co Ltd
4. Secretarial Nominee Co Ltd v Thomas
5. Truro Diocesan Board of Finance Ltd v Foley
6. Crown Estate Commissioners v Governors of the Peabody Trust
7. Goringe v Twinsectra Ltd
8. Kotecha v Rimington
assured tenancies:security of tenure:variation of non-rent terms
1. Variation of non-rent terms (secure tenants)
assured tenancies:separate dwelling, let as a
1. Let as a separate dwelling
2. Goodrich v Paisner
3. Uratemp Ventures Ltd v Collins
4. Westminster CC v Clarke
5. Gray v Brown
6. Grosvenor Estates Belgravia v Cochran
7. Horford Investments v Lambert
8. Kavanagh v Lyroudias
9. Mansfield DC v Langridge
10. Miller v Eyo
11. Mortgage Corporation v Ubah
12. Parkins v Westminster CC
13. St Catherine’s College v Dorling
14. Tyler v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
15. R v Rent Officer of Nottinghamshire Registration Area ex p Allen
16. Andrews v Brewer
17. Tomkins v Basildon DC
18. Webb v Barnet LBC
assured tenancies:subletting whole of premises
1. Subletting the whole of premises
assured tenancies:succession
1. Succession to assured tenancies
2. Southern Housing Group Ltd v Nutting
assured tenancies:suitable alternative accommodation
1. Laimond Properties Ltd v Al-Shakarchi
2. Suitable alternative accommodation
assured tenancies:surrender
1. Truro Diocesan Board of Finance Ltd v Foley
assured tenancies:transitional provisions
1. Assured tenancy transitional provisions
2. Laimond Properties Ltd v Al-Shakarchi
3. Rajah v Arogol Co Ltd
4. Secretarial Nominee Co Ltd v Thomas
5. Truro Diocesan Board of Finance Ltd v Foley
6. Crown Estate Commissioners v Governors of the Peabody Trust
7. Goringe v Twinsectra Ltd
8. Kotecha v Rimington
assured tenancies:use of words ‘assured tenancy’
1. Andrews v Cunningham
assured tenancies:variation of non-rent terms
1. Variation of non-rent terms (secure tenants)
asylum seekers : support
1. Introduction
asylum seekers :allocation
1. General
asylum seekers :destitution:National Assistance Act 1948
1. Introduction
asylum seekers :hard cases support
1. Introduction
asylum seekers :homelessness
1. Local connection and referral
2. Al-Ameri v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC; Osmani v Harrow LBC
asylum seekers :ineligible persons
1. General
asylum seekers :local connection and referral
1. Local connection and referral
2. Al-Ameri v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC; Osmani v Harrow LBC
asylum seekers :National Asylum Support Services
1. Mohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
2. Introduction
asylum seekers :New Asylum Model
1. Introduction
asylum seekers :safety net services
1. Introduction
availability of accommodation:continued occupation, reasonableness of
1. ‘Available’ accommodation: s176
2. Begum (Nipa) v Tower Hamlets LBC
3. Oxford CC v Bull
4. R v Westminster CC ex p Bishop
5. R v Barking and Dagenham LBC ex p Okuneye
6. R v Hackney LBC ex p Tonnicodi
7. R v Lambeth LBC ex p Ly
8. R v Newham LBC ex p Khan and Hussain
9. R v Peterborough CC ex p Carr
availability of accommodation:dependent children
1. ‘Available’ accommodation: s176
2. Oxford CC v Bull
availability of accommodation:families
1. R v Lambeth LBC ex p Ly
availability of accommodation:fiancé, reasonableness of residing with
1. R v Barking and Dagenham LBC ex p Okuneye
availability of accommodation:friends and companions, reasonableness of living with
1. R v Hackney LBC ex p Tonnicodi
availability of accommodation:homelessness
1. ‘Available’ accommodation: s176
2. Begum (Nipa) v Tower Hamlets LBC
3. Oxford CC v Bull
4. R v Westminster CC ex p Bishop
5. R v Barking and Dagenham LBC ex p Okuneye
6. R v Hackney LBC ex p Tonnicodi
7. R v Lambeth LBC ex p Ly
8. R v Newham LBC ex p Khan and Hussain
9. R v Peterborough CC ex p Carr
availability of accommodation:intentional homelessness when children come to living with parents
1. Oxford CC v Bull
availability of accommodation:legal availability
1. ‘Available’ accommodation: s176
availability of accommodation:partners to live with applicants, refusal of parents to allow
1. R v Peterborough CC ex p Carr
availability of accommodation:practical availability
1. ‘Available’ accommodation: s176
2. Begum (Nipa) v Tower Hamlets LBC
availability of accommodation:reasonableness
1. R v Barking and Dagenham LBC ex p Okuneye
2. R v Hackney LBC ex p Tonnicodi
3. R v Lambeth LBC ex p Ly
availability of accommodation:sisters, splitting two
1. R v Newham LBC ex p Khan and Hussain
availability of accommodation:travel, affordability of
1. Begum (Nipa) v Tower Hamlets LBC
availability of accommodation:two separate units, provided in
1. R v Hackney LBC ex p Tonnicodi
availability of accommodation:violence and harassment, fear of
1. R v Westminster CC ex p Bishop
babies, women with
1. R v Brent LBC ex p Yusuf
2. R v Newham LBC ex p Dada
bailiffs
1. R v Wandsworth County Court ex p Wandsworth LBC
2. Haniff v Robinson
3. Francis v Brown
banisters
1. Walker v Nottingham CC
bankruptcy and possession claims
1. Possession claims and bankruptcy
2. Harlow DC v Hall
bankruptcy and possession claims:breach of obligations as ground for possession
1. Cadogan Estates Ltd v McMahon
bankruptcy and possession claims:enforcement, suspension of
1. Harlow DC v Hall
bankruptcy and possession claims:mortgage possession proceedings
1. Nationwide Building Society v Purvis
bankruptcy and possession claims:security of tenure
1. Possession claims and bankruptcy
2. Harlow DC v Hall
bankruptcy and possession claims:standing
1. Nationwide Building Society v Purvis
bankruptcy and possession claims:suspended possession orders
1. Harlow DC v Hall
barking dogs
1. Budd v Colchester BC
basements
1. Grosvenor Estates Belgravia v Cochran
bathrooms, lights in
1. Symons v Warren
bed and breakfast:all homeless households in B&Bs, policy of booking
1. R v Newham LBC ex p Ojuri (No 3)
bed and breakfast:children or pregnant women
1. Suitability and out of area placements
bed and breakfast:damages for spending time in B&Bs
1. Ogle v Bundhoo
bed and breakfast:dwelling, as not being a
1. R v Newham LBC ex p Ojuri (No 5)
bed and breakfast:gypsies
1. Codona v Mid-Bedfordshire DC
bed and breakfast:harassment and illegal eviction, damages for
1. Ogle v Bundhoo
bed and breakfast:individual needs, consideration of
1. R v Newham LBC ex p Ojuri (No 3)
bed and breakfast:pregnant women
1. Orejudos v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
bed and breakfast:private and family life and home, right to respect for
1. Orejudos v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
bed and breakfast:signing in rules, refusal to comply with
1. Orejudos v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
bed and breakfast:suitability
1. Suitability and out of area placements
2. Codona v Mid-Bedfordshire DC
3. R v Newham LBC ex p Ojuri (No 3)
bed linen, laundry of
1. Nelson Developments Ltd v Taboada
blanket same day policies
1. R (Khazai) v Birmingham CC
board and attendance :amount of board
1. Otter v Norman
board and attendance :assured tenancies
1. Board and attendance
board and attendance :breakfast:other houses, provision in
1. Rita Dale v Adrahill Ltd
board and attendance :contrivances
1. Otter v Norman
board and attendance :daily cleaning
1. Nelson Developments Ltd v Taboada
board and attendance :de minimis requirement
1. Otter v Norman
board and attendance :security of tenure
1. Board and attendance
2. Otter v Norman
3. Nelson Developments Ltd v Taboada
4. Rita Dale v Adrahill Ltd
board and attendance :weekly laundry of bed linen
1. Nelson Developments Ltd v Taboada
boilers, breakdown of
1. Fakhari v Newman
breach of obligations as ground for possession
1. Breach of obligation
breach of obligations as ground for possession:assured tenancies
1. Breach of obligation
2. Breach of obligation (Housing Act 1988 Sch 2 Ground 12)
3. Pollards Hill HA v Marsh
4. Sanctuary Housing Association v Baker (No 2)
breach of obligations as ground for possession:bankruptcy
1. Cadogan Estates Ltd v McMahon
breach of obligations as ground for possession:business user, definition of
1. Florent v Horez
breach of obligations as ground for possession:caravan parking, policy regarding
1. Barking and Dagenham LBC v Hyatt and Hyatt
breach of statutory duty
1. Protection from Eviction Act 1977 (civil provisions)
break clauses
1. Aylward v Fawaz
breakfast, providing:other houses, provision in
1. Rita Dale v Adrahill Ltd
building works:builders, liability of landlords as
1. Rimmer v Liverpool CC
2. Targett v Torfaen BC
building works:disrepair
1. Lambert v Barratt Homes Ltd and Rochdale MBC
2. D & F Estates Ltd v Church Commissioners
building works:harassment and illegal eviction, damages for
1. Abbas v Iqbal
building works:major building works amounting to nuisance
1. Guppys (Bridport) Ltd v Brookling
building works:notice seeking possession
1. Waltham Forest LBC v England
building works:nuisance
1. Lambert v Barratt Homes Ltd and Rochdale MBC
building works:purpose built, sufficient degree to render flats
1. Barnes v Goresuch
building works:subcontractors
1. D & F Estates Ltd v Church Commissioners
burglary due to failure to repair front doors, landlords liable for
1. Marshall v Rubypoint Ltd
burns from hot pipes
1. Boateng v Camden LBC
burst pipes
1. Passley v Wandsworth LBC
business tenancies:assured shorthold tenancies
1. Andrews v Brewer
business tenancies:business user, definition of
1. Florent v Horez
business tenancies:company lets
1. Company lets
2. Eaton Square Properties Ltd v O’Higgins
3. Estavest Investments Ltd v Commercial Express Travel Ltd
4. Hilton v Plustitle Ltd
5. Kaye v Massbetter Ltd and Kanter
6. Navinter SA v Pastoll
business tenancies:incidental, where business merely
1. Gurton v Parrott
2. Wright v Mortimer
business tenancies:lodgers, taking in
1. Lewis v Weldcrest Ltd
business tenancies:mixed business/residential use
1. Wagle v Trustees of Henry Smith’s Charity Kensington Estate
2. Webb v Barnet LBC
3. Pirabakaran v Patel
business tenancies:non-use of business part
1. Pulleng v Curran
business tenancies:part of premises, occupation of
1. Broadway Investments Hackney Ltd v Grant
2. Pulleng v Curran
business tenancies:reason for occupying premises, business not
1. Wright v Mortimer
business tenancies:Rent Act tenancies
1. Wright v Mortimer
business tenancies:security of tenure
1. Business tenancies (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 11, Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 4 and Rent Act 1977 s24)
2. Broadway Investments Hackney Ltd v Grant
3. Cheryl Investments Ltd v Saldanha
4. Gurton v Parrott
5. Lewis v Weldcrest Ltd
6. Pulleng v Curran
7. Tan v Sitkowski
8. Wagle v Trustees of Henry Smith’s Charity Kensington Estate
9. Wright v Mortimer
business tenancies:separate dwelling, let as a
1. Andrews v Brewer
2. Tomkins v Basildon DC
3. Webb v Barnet LBC
business tenancies:significant purpose of occupation, business must be
1. Cheryl Investments Ltd v Saldanha
business tenancies:unilateral acts of tenants
1. Wagle v Trustees of Henry Smith’s Charity Kensington Estate
business tenancies:variation to housing tenancies when terminated
1. Tomkins v Basildon DC
business user:covenants against business use
1. Caradon DC v Paton
business user:definition D6,3
1. Florent v Horez
business ventures, loss of home due to failed
1. R v Exeter CC ex p Tranckle
cannabis, possession of
1. Abrahams v Wilson
caravans:breach of obligations as ground for possession
1. Barking and Dagenham LBC v Hyatt and Hyatt
caravans:homelessness
1. Higgs v Brighton and Hove CC
2. Steward v Kingston upon Thames RLBC
caravans:parking policy
1. Barking and Dagenham LBC v Hyatt and Hyatt
caravans:separate dwelling, let as a
1. R v Rent Officer of Nottinghamshire Registration Area ex p Allen
caravans:unauthorised sites, on
1. Steward v Kingston upon Thames RLBC
care leavers convicted of criminal offences
1. Greenwich LBC v Grogan
carers
1. Hildebrand v Moon
2. Ali v Camden LBC
case stated
1. Liverpool CC v Worthington
cats, having a large number of
1. Harlow DC v Sewell
cattle from land, removal of
1. Bristol & West Investments plc v Tompkins
causation:chain of causation, breaking the
1. R v Hackney LBC ex p Ajayi
causation:compensation
1. Davenport v Walsall MBC
causation:intentional homelessness
1. Causation and settled accommodation
2. Bratton v Croydon LBC
3. Denton v Southwark LBC
4. Dyson v Kerrier DC
5. Knight v Vale Royal BC
6. Minchin v Sheffield CC
7. Mohamed v Westminster CC
8. R v Gloucester CC ex p Miles
9. Steward v Kingston upon Thames RLBC
10. Stewart v Lambeth LBC
11. Watchman v Ipswich BC
12. R v Basingstoke and Deane BC ex p Bassett
13. R v Croydon LBC ex p Easom
14. R v Hackney LBC ex p Ajayi
15. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p P
16. R v Hounslow LBC ex p R
17. R v Merton LBC ex p Ruffle
18. R v Newham LBC ex p Campbell
19. R v Shrewsbury and Atcham BC ex p Griffiths
20. R v Westminster CC ex p Reid
21. R v Kyle and Carrick DC ex p Robson
causation:rent arrears
1. Bratton v Croydon LBC
causation:settled accommodation
1. Causation and settled accommodation
2. Bratton v Croydon LBC
3. Denton v Southwark LBC
4. Dyson v Kerrier DC
5. Knight v Vale Royal BC
6. Minchin v Sheffield CC
7. Mohamed v Westminster CC
8. R v Gloucester CC ex p Miles
9. Steward v Kingston upon Thames RLBC
10. Stewart v Lambeth LBC
11. Watchman v Ipswich BC
12. R v Basingstoke and Deane BC ex p Bassett
13. R v Croydon LBC ex p Easom
14. R v Hackney LBC ex p Ajayi
15. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p P
16. R v Hounslow LBC ex p R
17. R v Merton LBC ex p Ruffle
18. R v Newham LBC ex p Campbell
19. R v Shrewsbury and Atcham BC ex p Griffiths
20. R v Westminster CC ex p Reid
21. R v Kyle and Carrick DC ex p Robson
Chagos Islanders
1. R (Antoine) v Reigate and Banstead DC and First Secretary of State
chalets
1. Nutt v Read
change in circumstances:homelessness
1. Repeat/fresh applications
2. Tower Hamlets LBC v Begum (Rikha)
3. Ali v Camden LBC
change in circumstances:material changes of circumstances test
1. Repeat/fresh applications
2. Tower Hamlets LBC v Begum (Rikha)
3. Ali v Camden LBC
change in circumstances:service charges and long leases
1. Pole Properties Ltd v Feinberg
change in circumstances:suspension of possession orders
1. Ujima Housing Association v Smith
charging orders
1. Croydon (Unique) Ltd v Wright
cheques as conditional rent payments
1. Day v Coltrane
children, inability to control
1. Kensington and Chelsea RLBC v Simmonds
children, inability to control:conduct does not have to take place in dwelling houses
1. Northampton BC v Lovatt
children, inability to control:discretionary grounds
1. Breach of obligation
children, inability to control:facts without fact-finding exercise, preliminary issues determined on
1. Southwark LBC v O’Sullivan
children, inability to control:fairness
1. Camden LBC v McBride
children, inability to control:fault
1. Kensington and Chelsea RLBC v Simmonds
children, inability to control:grounds for possession
1. Breach of obligation
2. Breach of obligation and anti-social behaviour
3. Barking and Dagenham LBC v Hyatt and Hyatt
children, inability to control:neighbours, definition of
1. Northampton BC v Lovatt
children, inability to control:nuisance or annoyance
1. Camden LBC v McBride
2. Kensington and Chelsea RLBC v Simmonds
3. Northampton BC v Lovatt
children, inability to control:possession orders
1. Southwark LBC v O’Sullivan
2. Kensington and Chelsea RLBC v Simmonds
3. Breach of obligation and anti-social behaviour
4. Barking and Dagenham LBC v Hyatt and Hyatt
children, inability to control:preliminary issues determined on facts without fact-finding exercise
1. Southwark LBC v O’Sullivan
children, inability to control:racial abuse
1. Kensington and Chelsea RLBC v Simmonds
children, inability to control:reasonableness
1. Breach of obligation and anti-social behaviour
2. Barking and Dagenham LBC v Hyatt and Hyatt
children, inability to control:Rent Act tenancies
1. Breach of obligation
2. Breach of obligation (Rent Act 1977 Sch 15 Case 1)
3. Cadogan Estates Ltd v McMahon
4. Florent v Horez
children, inability to control:res judicata in second possession proceedings, breach as being
1. Sanctuary Housing Association v Baker (No 2)
children, inability to control:restrictive grounds in tenancy agreements, landlords bound by
1. Pollards Hill HA v Marsh
children, inability to control:secure tenancies
1. Breach of obligation
2. Breach of obligation (Housing Act 1985 Sch 2 Ground 1)
3. Southwark LBC v O’Sullivan
4. Camden LBC v McBride
5. Kensington and Chelsea RLBC v Simmonds
6. Northampton BC v Lovatt
children, inability to control:subjective determination of breach, fairness of
1. Camden LBC v McBride
children, inability to control:suspended possession orders
1. Kensington and Chelsea RLBC v Simmonds
children:16–17 year olds, priority need and
1. 16/17-year-olds
2. R (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
children:age assessments
1. Age assessments
children:assessment of needs
1. R (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
children:availability of accommodation
1. ‘Available’ accommodation: s176
2. Oxford CC v Bull
children:babies, women with
1. R v Brent LBC ex p Yusuf
2. R v Newham LBC ex p Dada
children:bed and breakfast
1. Suitability and out of area placements
children:blood relatives, succession of
1. Sheffield CC v Wall (No 2)
children:breach of obligations as ground for possession
1. Kensington and Chelsea RLBC v Simmonds
children:carers for parents, succession of children who were
1. Hildebrand v Moon
children:continued occupation, reasonableness of
1. R v Brent LBC ex p Yusuf
2. R v Medina BC ex p Dee
children:control children as ground for possession, inability to
1. Kensington and Chelsea RLBC v Simmonds
children:coughs and colds
1. Conroy v Hire Token Ltd
children:de facto children
1. Brock v Wollams
2. Sefton Holdings Ltd v Cairns
children:definition
1. Sheffield CC v Wall (No 2)
children:dependants, applications from
1. R v Oldham MBC ex p Garlick; R v Bexley LBC ex p Bentum
children:disrepair:damages
1. Conroy v Hire Token Ltd
children:disrepair:injunctions
1. Hooton v Liverpool CC
children:disrepair:separate causes of action
1. Murphy and Peers v Stockport MBC
children:disrepair:threats to welfare
1. Hooton v Liverpool CC
children:disrepair:window locks
1. Stevens v Blaenau Gwent CBC
children:EU nationals
1. Harrow LBC v Ibrahim
2. Teixeira v Lambeth LBC
children:fostering
1. Sheffield CC v Wall
children:grant of tenancies to children
1. Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Alexander-David
children:homelessness:bed and breakfast
1. Suitability and out of area placements
children:homelessness:continued occupation, reasonableness of
1. R v Brent LBC ex p Yusuf
2. R v Medina BC ex p Dee
children:homelessness:dependents, applications from
1. R v Oldham MBC ex p Garlick; R v Bexley LBC ex p Bentum
children:homelessness:eligibility
1. Harrow LBC v Ibrahim
2. Teixeira v Lambeth LBC
children:homelessness:enquiries
1. R v Lambeth LBC ex p Walters
children:homelessness:priority need
1. Dependent children
2. Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBC
3. R v Lambeth LBC ex p Vaglivello
4. 16/17-year-olds
5. R (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
6. Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBC
7. Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBC
children:illegitimate children, succession of
1. Sheffield CC v Wall (No 2)
children:imprisonment of children
1. New Charter Housing (North) Ltd v Ashcroft
children:indifference to effect of behaviour of children
1. Manchester CC v Higgins
children:injunctions
1. Harrow LBC v G
2. Hooton v Liverpool CC
children:intentional homelessness
1. Oxford CC v Bull
children:medical advice
1. R v Medina BC ex p Dee
children:medical examinations
1. R v Lambeth LBC ex p Walters
children:nuisance and annoyance:imprisonment of child
1. New Charter Housing (North) Ltd v Ashcroft
children:nuisance and annoyance:indifference to effect of behaviour of children
1. Manchester CC v Higgins
children:nuisance and annoyance:racial harassment by children
1. West Kent Housing Association v Davies
children:nuisance and annoyance:reign of terror by children, outright orders where
1. Newcastle upon Tyne CC v Morrison
children:nuisance and annoyance:remorse, outright orders where tenant shows no
1. Manchester CC v Higgins
children:nuisance and annoyance:suspended possession orders
1. Knowsley Housing Trust v McMullen
children:part-time with parents, succession when living
1. Swanbrae Ltd v Elliott
children:possession orders
1. Knowsley Housing Trust v McMullen
children:pregnant women leaving property not suitable for baby
1. R v Brent LBC ex p Yusuf
children:priority need
1. Dependent children
2. Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBC
3. R v Lambeth LBC ex p Vaglivello
4. 16/17-year-olds
5. R (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
6. Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBC
7. Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBC
children:racial harassment by children
1. West Kent Housing Association v Davies
children:reign of terror by children, outright orders where
1. Newcastle upon Tyne CC v Morrison
children:remorse, outright orders where tenant shows no
1. Manchester CC v Higgins
children:Rent Act tenancies
1. Portman Registrars v Mohammed Latif
children:slapping children
1. R v Westminster CC ex p Reid
children:spouses cannot be dependent children
1. R v Lambeth LBC ex p Vaglivello
children:step children
1. Sheffield CC v Wall (No 2)
children:succession
1. Sheffield CC v Wall
2. Sheffield CC v Wall (No 2)
3. Brock v Wollams
4. Hildebrand v Moon
5. Sefton Holdings Ltd v Cairns
6. Swanbrae Ltd v Elliott
7. Portman Registrars v Mohammed Latif
children:suspended possession orders
1. Knowsley Housing Trust v McMullen
children:window locks
1. Stevens v Blaenau Gwent CBC
Children Act services: notice to quit
1. Bater v Bater; Bater v Greenwich LBC
Children Act services:homelessness:pending reviews, discretion to accommodate
1. R (Hassan) v Croydon LBC
Children Act services:homelessness:priority need
1. R (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
Children Act services:pending reviews, discretion to accommodate
1. R (Hassan) v Croydon LBC
Children Act services:priority need
1. R (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
Children Act services:social services
1. Introduction
2. Children Act 1989 s17
3. Children Act 1989 s20
4. Children Act 1989 s23C
Children Act services:trespassers
1. R v Hillingdon LBC ex p McDonagh
clean-ups after repairs
1. McGreal v Wake
cleaning
1. Nelson Developments Ltd v Taboada
clearance areas
1. Local authority enforcement
close relationships between strangers, succession and
1. Carega Properties SA v Sharratt
cockroach infestation :common parts
1. Habinteg Housing Association v James
cockroach infestation :compensation
1. Ogunlowo v Southwark LBC
cockroach infestation :disrepair
1. Habinteg Housing Association v James
2. Sharpe v Manchester MDC
cockroach infestation :Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under
1. Ogunlowo v Southwark LBC
cockroach infestation :negligence
1. Sharpe v Manchester MDC
cohabitees, succession of
1. Westminster CC v Peart
2. Succession to assured tenancies
collusion
1. Intentional homelessness
commencement of possession proceedings
1. Patel v Smeaton
2. Camden LBC v M
3. Commencement of proceedings
4. Alamo Housing Co-operative Ltd v Meredith
5. Chesters Accommodation Agency Ltd v Abebrese
6. Barnet Primary Care Trust v X
7. Birmingham CC v Hosey
commencement of possession proceedings:agents, standing of
1. Chesters Accommodation Agency Ltd v Abebrese
commencement of possession proceedings:claim forms., issue of
1. Salford CC v Garner
commencement of possession proceedings:High Court proceedings
1. Barnet Primary Care Trust v X
commencement of possession proceedings:introductory tenancies
1. Salford CC v Garner
commencement of possession proceedings:mental capacity of tenants
1. Camden LBC v M
commencement of possession proceedings:notice to quit, service of
1. Alamo Housing Co-operative Ltd v Meredith
commencement of possession proceedings:setting aside orders
1. Patel v Smeaton
2. Camden LBC v M
commencement of possession proceedings:signed, not rubber-stamped, requirement for statements of truth to be
1. Birmingham CC v Hosey
commencement of possession proceedings:standing
1. Alamo Housing Co-operative Ltd v Meredith
2. Chesters Accommodation Agency Ltd v Abebrese
commencement of possession proceedings:statements of truth
1. Birmingham CC v Hosey
commencement of possession proceedings:subtenants
1. Alamo Housing Co-operative Ltd v Meredith
commencement of possession proceedings:sufficient interest to evict subtenants
1. Alamo Housing Co-operative Ltd v Meredith
commencement of possession proceedings:summons sent to tenants, no evidence that
1. Patel v Smeaton
committal for contempt:adjournments
1. Stafford BC v Haynes
committal for contempt:admissions
1. Stafford BC v Haynes
committal for contempt:appeals
1. Medina Housing Association v Connolly
committal for contempt:breaches, orders must set out
1. O’Neill v Murray
committal for contempt:cattle from land, removal of
1. Bristol & West Investments plc v Tompkins
committal for contempt:failure of orders to set out what landlords must do
1. Parsons v Nasar
committal for contempt:failure to comply with possession orders
1. Tuohy v Bell
committal for contempt:harassment and illegal eviction
1. Injunctions against landlords
2. Committal against landlords
3. Howes v Howes
4. O’Neill v Murray
5. Parsons v Nasar
6. Saxby v McKinley
7. Wright v Jess
committal for contempt:imprisonment for not readmitting tenants
1. Saxby v McKinley
committal for contempt:Injunctions, breach of
1. R (James) v HM Prison Birmingham and others
committal for contempt:injunctions, breach of
1. Injunctions against tenants and third parties
2. Barnet LBC v Hurst
3. Birmingham CC v Flatt
4. Gill v Birmingham City Council
5. Hillingdon LBC v Vijayatunga
6. Islington LBC v Doey
7. Leicester CC v Lewis
8. Longhurst Homes Ltd v Killen
9. Manchester CC v McCann
10. Manchester CC v Worthington
11. Medina Housing Association v Connolly
12. Middlesbrough BC v Turnbull
13. Nottingham CC v Cutts
14. Sandwell MBC v Preece
15. Stafford BC v Haynes
16. Tower Hamlets LBC v Long
17. Wear Valley DC v Robson
18. Injunctions against landlords
19. Howes v Howes
20. O’Neill v Murray
21. Parsons v Nasar
22. Saxby v McKinley
committal for contempt:notice in exceptional circumstances, committal orders without
1. Wright v Jess
committal for contempt:notice of hearings
1. Middlesbrough BC v Turnbull
committal for contempt:possession orders, enforcement of
1. Bristol & West Investments plc v Tompkins
2. Tuohy v Bell
committal for contempt:procedural defects
1. Hillingdon LBC v Vijayatunga
2. Medina Housing Association v Connolly
committal for contempt:readmit tenants, failure to
1. Saxby v McKinley
committal for contempt:security of tenure
1. Injunctions against tenants and third parties
2. Barnet LBC v Hurst
3. Birmingham CC v Flatt
4. Leicester CC v Lewis
5. Longhurst Homes Ltd v Killen
6. Manchester CC v McCann
7. Manchester CC v Worthington
8. Medina Housing Association v Connolly
9. Middlesbrough BC v Turnbull
10. Nottingham CC v Cutts
11. Stafford BC v Haynes
12. Tower Hamlets LBC v Long
13. Wear Valley DC v Robson
committal for contempt:sentencing
1. Barnet LBC v Hurst
2. Longhurst Homes Ltd v Killen
3. Middlesbrough BC v Turnbull
4. Nottingham CC v Cutts
5. R (James) v HM Prison Birmingham and others
6. Sandwell MBC v Preece
committal for contempt:service of committal orders, proper
1. Howes v Howes
committal for contempt:technical nature, procedural defects of a
1. Hillingdon LBC v Vijayatunga
committal for contempt:threats to kill
1. Nottingham CC v Cutts
committal for contempt:witnesses, wilful insults to
1. Manchester CC v McCann
common parts
1. Goodrich v Paisner
2. Liverpool CC v Irwin
3. Habinteg Housing Association v James
Communist regime, restoration of property confiscated during
1. Velikovi v Bulgaria
community care:community care
1. Introduction
community care:definition
1. Introduction
community care:destitution
1. Introduction
community care:social services
1. Introduction
companies:connected or associated companies, sale to
1. Bradford and Bingley plc v Ross
2. Mortgage Express v Mardner
companies:landlords, property acquired from
1. Evans v Engelson
companies:mortgage possession proceedings
1. Bradford and Bingley plc v Ross
2. Mortgage Express v Mardner
company lets:assured tenancies
1. Company lets
company lets:directors or shareholders, where occupiers are neither
1. Navinter SA v Pastoll
company lets:intention for company to be tenant
1. Kaye v Massbetter Ltd and Kanter
company lets:nominees
1. Company lets
company lets:rent
1. Estavest Investments Ltd v Commercial Express Travel Ltd
company lets:Rent Act tenancies
1. Company lets
2. Eaton Square Properties Ltd v O’Higgins
3. Estavest Investments Ltd v Commercial Express Travel Ltd
company lets:secure tenancies
1. Company lets
company lets:security of tenure
1. Company lets
2. Eaton Square Properties Ltd v O’Higgins
3. Estavest Investments Ltd v Commercial Express Travel Ltd
4. Hilton v Plustitle Ltd
5. Kaye v Massbetter Ltd and Kanter
6. Navinter SA v Pastoll
company lets:set up company, where tenant is required to
1. Hilton v Plustitle Ltd
company lets:shams:directors or shareholders, where occupiers are neither
1. Navinter SA v Pastoll
company lets:shams:intention for company to be tenant
1. Kaye v Massbetter Ltd and Kanter
company lets:shams:rent, where company pays the
1. Estavest Investments Ltd v Commercial Express Travel Ltd
company lets:shams:set up company, where tenant is required to
1. Hilton v Plustitle Ltd
company lets:shams:tax advantages
1. Eaton Square Properties Ltd v O’Higgins
company lets:shareholders, where occupiers are not
1. Navinter SA v Pastoll
company lets:tax advantages
1. Eaton Square Properties Ltd v O’Higgins
compensation:abatement orders, failure to comply with
1. Ashard v Islington LBC
completion, purchasers let into occupation before
1. Jones v Miah
condensation:compensation
1. Ogunlowo v Southwark LBC
condensation:disrepair, damages for
1. Switzer v Law
condensation:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under
1. Carr v Hackney LBC
2. Farrar v Dover CC
3. Pike v Sefton MBC
4. Ogunlowo v Southwark LBC
5. Pringle v Hackney LBC
condensation:extractor fans
1. Switzer v Law
condensation:heating
1. Carr v Hackney LBC
2. Farrar v Dover CC
3. Pike v Sefton MBC
condensation:repairing covenants
1. Quick v Taff-Ely BC
2. Staves v Leeds CC
condensation:structure
1. Quick v Taff-Ely BC
confidentiality
1. R v Poole BC ex p Cooper
conflicts of interest
1. Belchikova v Russia
consent orders
1. ‘Consent orders’
2. Appleton v Aspin
3. Hounslow LBC v McBride
4. Plaschkes v Jones
5. R v Bloomsbury and Marylebone County Court ex p Blackburne
6. R v Worthing BC ex p Bruce
7. Smith v McGoldrick
8. Wandsworth LBC v Fadayomi
9. R v Birmingham CC ex p Foley
10. R v Newcastle upon Tyne County Court ex p Thompson
consent orders:admissions
1. Hounslow LBC v McBride
2. R v Worthing BC ex p Bruce
3. Smith v McGoldrick
consent orders:compensation to tenants, quashing orders despite payments of
1. R v Bloomsbury and Marylebone County Court ex p Blackburne
consent orders:compromise, setting aside orders made by
1. R v Birmingham CC ex p Foley
consent orders:like to leave, where tenants have said they would
1. Plaschkes v Jones
consent orders:possession orders
1. ‘Consent orders’
2. Appleton v Aspin
3. Hounslow LBC v McBride
4. Plaschkes v Jones
5. R v Bloomsbury and Marylebone County Court ex p Blackburne
6. R v Worthing BC ex p Bruce
7. Smith v McGoldrick
8. Wandsworth LBC v Fadayomi
9. R v Birmingham CC ex p Foley
10. R v Newcastle upon Tyne County Court ex p Thompson
consent orders:prior agreements to leave
1. Appleton v Aspin
consent orders:proved or admitted, where conditions for making orders not
1. R v Newcastle upon Tyne County Court ex p Thompson
consent orders:secure tenants, implied admissions that tenants not
1. R v Worthing BC ex p Bruce
consent orders:setting aside applications
1. Wandsworth LBC v Fadayomi
2. R v Birmingham CC ex p Foley
3. R v Newcastle upon Tyne County Court ex p Thompson
consent orders:withdrawal of admissions prior to hearings
1. Smith v McGoldrick
construction of premises, failure to carry out necessary works in
1. Andrews v Schooling
consultation:security of tenure
1. Housing management and consultation (secure tenants)
consultation:variation of non-rent terms
1. Variation of non-rent terms (secure tenants)
Consumer Credit Act 1974 and mortgage possession proceedings
1. Consumer Credit Act 1974
2. Broadwick Financial Services Ltd v Spencer
3. First National Bank v Syed
4. Rahman v Sterling Credit Ltd
5. Southern and District Finance plc v Barnes
6. Barclays Bank plc v Brooks
7. Cedar Holdings v Jenkins
8. City Mortgage Corp Ltd v Baptiste
Consumer Credit Act 1974 and mortgage possession proceedings:counterclaims
1. Rahman v Sterling Credit Ltd
2. City Mortgage Corp Ltd v Baptiste
Consumer Credit Act 1974 and mortgage possession proceedings:defence, time limits and
1. Rahman v Sterling Credit Ltd
Consumer Credit Act 1974 and mortgage possession proceedings:discretion
1. Southern and District Finance plc v Barnes
Consumer Credit Act 1974 and mortgage possession proceedings:extortionate credit bargain
1. Broadwick Financial Services Ltd v Spencer
2. City Mortgage Corp Ltd v Baptiste
Consumer Credit Act 1974 and mortgage possession proceedings:High Court, striking out proceedings in
1. Barclays Bank plc v Brooks
Consumer Credit Act 1974 and mortgage possession proceedings:instalments, power to order
1. First National Bank v Syed
Consumer Credit Act 1974 and mortgage possession proceedings:interest rates
1. Consumer Credit Act 1974
2. Cedar Holdings v Jenkins
Consumer Credit Act 1974 and mortgage possession proceedings:regulated agreements
1. Consumer Credit Act 1974
Consumer Credit Act 1974 and mortgage possession proceedings:rescheduling rate of payment
1. Consumer Credit Act 1974
Consumer Credit Act 1974 and mortgage possession proceedings:striking out
1. Barclays Bank plc v Brooks
Consumer Credit Act 1974 and mortgage possession proceedings:time limits
1. Rahman v Sterling Credit Ltd
Consumer Credit Act 1974 and mortgage possession proceedings:time orders
1. Consumer Credit Act 1974
2. Southern and District Finance plc v Barnes
3. Cedar Holdings v Jenkins
contra proferentem rule
1. Gilje v Charlegrove Securities Ltd
2. Bank of Scotland v Ladjadj
contractors, appointment of
1. Long v Southwark LBC
contributory negligence
1. Damages
conversions
1. Barnes v Goresuch
cooking facilities
1. Uratemp Ventures Ltd v Collins
2. Ferguson v Jones
costs
1. Costs
2. Church Commissioners for England v Ibrahim
3. Hackney LBC v Campbell
costs:access not given to abate nuisance
1. Jones v Walsall MBC
costs:advance notice
1. Taylor v Walsall and District Property and Investment Co
costs:allocation to track
1. Birmingham CC v Lee
costs:assessment, no formal procedure on
1. R v Southend Stipendiary Magistrate ex p Rochford DC
costs:compensation
1. Davenport v Walsall MBC
costs:disrepair
1. Birmingham CC v Lee
2. Connell v Hackney LBC
costs:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under:access not given to abate nuisance
1. Jones v Walsall MBC
costs:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under:advance notice
1. Taylor v Walsall and District Property and Investment Co
costs:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under:assessment, no formal procedure on
1. R v Southend Stipendiary Magistrate ex p Rochford DC
costs:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under:compensation
1. Davenport v Walsall MBC
costs:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under:nuisance existing at time of complaints
1. R v Dudley Magistrates’ Court ex p Hollis
costs:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under:quashing costs orders
1. R v Enfield Justices ex p Whittle
costs:failed on all but one claim, where defendant had
1. Hackney LBC v Campbell
costs:follow the event rule
1. Hackney LBC v Campbell
costs:homelessness decisions
1. R v Lambeth LBC ex p Wilson
costs:indemnity costs
1. Church Commissioners for England v Ibrahim
costs:judicial review
1. R v Lambeth LBC ex p Wilson
costs:nuisance existing at time of complaints
1. R v Dudley Magistrates’ Court ex p Hollis
costs:possession proceedings
1. Costs
2. Church Commissioners for England v Ibrahim
3. Hackney LBC v Campbell
costs:pre-action protocol
1. Birmingham CC v Lee
costs:quashing costs orders
1. R v Enfield Justices ex p Whittle
costs:service charges and long leases
1. Iperion Investments Corporation v Broadwalk House Residents Ltd
2. Sella House Ltd v Mears
3. Primeridge Ltd v Jean Muir Ltd
costs:undertakings, breach of
1. Connell v Hackney LBC
costs:wasted costs orders
1. R v Lambeth LBC ex p Wilson
coughs and colds, disrepair causing
1. Conroy v Hire Token Ltd
counterclaims:consumer credit
1. Rahman v Sterling Credit Ltd
2. City Mortgage Corp Ltd v Baptiste
counterclaims:disrepair
1. Henley v Bloom
2. Islington LBC v Keane
3. Set-off and counterclaim
counterclaims:mortgage possession proceedings
1. Rahman v Sterling Credit Ltd
2. City Mortgage Corp Ltd v Baptiste
3. Royal Bank of Scotland v O’Shea
counterclaims:rent arrears
1. Etherington v Burt
2. Haringey LBC v Stewart
counterclaims:set-off
1. Royal Bank of Scotland v O’Shea
counterclaims:time limits
1. Islington LBC v Keane
2. Rahman v Sterling Credit Ltd
covenants:business use, against
1. Caradon DC v Paton
covenants:forfeiture
1. Cooper v Henderson
covenants:gas and electricity
1. McCall v Abelesz
covenants:injunctions
1. Caradon DC v Paton
2. Hampstead and Suburban Properties v Diomedous
covenants:negative covenants
1. Savva v Houssein
covenants:service charges and long leases
1. Hackney LBC v Thompson
2. Mullaney v Maybourne Grange (Croydon) Management Co Ltd
3. Holding and Management Ltd v Property Holding and Investment Trust plc
covenants:variation of non-rent terms
1. R v Brent LBC ex p Blatt
covenants:waiver of past breaches
1. Cooper v Henderson
cracks, damages for
1. Pierce v Westminster CC
creation of tenancies
1. Creation of tenancies
2. Mexfield Housing Co-operative Limited v Berrisford
3. Battersea Churches Housing Trust v Hunte
4. Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Alexander-David
5. Restormel BC v Buscombe
6. Tower Hamlets LBC v Ayinde
7. Westminster CC v Basson
8. Broadley v Leeds CC
creation of tenancies:children, grant of tenancies to
1. Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Alexander-David
creation of tenancies:conduct
1. Restormel BC v Buscombe
creation of tenancies:exclusive possession
1. Creation of tenancies
creation of tenancies:fixed and periodic terms
1. Broadley v Leeds CC
creation of tenancies:inferred, grants of tenancies
1. Tower Hamlets LBC v Ayinde
creation of tenancies:intention inferred from
1. Restormel BC v Buscombe
creation of tenancies:invitation to treat
1. Battersea Churches Housing Trust v Hunte
creation of tenancies:outside the housing acts
1. Mexfield Housing Co-operative Limited v Berrisford
creation of tenancies:previous tenants have left, grants of tenancies inferred where
1. Tower Hamlets LBC v Ayinde
creation of tenancies:rent
1. Creation of tenancies
2. Westminster CC v Basson
creation of tenancies:rent books sent in error
1. Westminster CC v Basson
creation of tenancies:services, payment of rent with
1. Creation of tenancies
creation of tenancies:subjective intention
1. Restormel BC v Buscombe
creation of tenancies:term
1. Creation of tenancies
creation of tenancies:uncertain term
1. Mexfield Housing Co-operative Limited v Berrisford
creation of tenancies:written agreements
1. Battersea Churches Housing Trust v Hunte
criminal offences:arrest
1. Anti-social behaviour
criminal offences:assault
1. Naveed v Raja
2. Rubio-Manzano v Ace Lettings and Pedonomou
criminal offences:compensation orders
1. Budd v Colchester BC
criminal offences:drugs convictions
1. North Devon Homes Ltd v Batchelor
2. Knowsley Housing Trust v Prescott
criminal offences:harassment and illegal eviction
1. Housing Act 1988 ss27 and 28
criminal offences:interim possession orders
1. Interim possession orders and removal directions
criminal offences:nuisance and annoyance
1. Raglan Housing Association Ltd v Fairclough
2. Abrahams v Wilson
3. Greenwich LBC v Grogan
4. North Devon Homes Ltd v Batchelor
5. Wandsworth LBC v Webb
criminal offences:overcrowding
1. Overcrowding
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990
1. Criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 and other Acts
2. Birmingham CC v Oakley
3. Budd v Colchester BC
4. Issa v Hackney LBC
5. R v Bristol CC ex p Everett
6. SFI Group plc v Gosport BC
7. Botross v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
8. Camden LBC v Gunby
9. Canterbury CC v Ferris
10. Carr v Hackney LBC
11. Cunningham v Birmingham CC
12. Davenport v Walsall MBC
13. East Staffordshire BC v Fairless
14. Farrar v Dover CC
15. Greater London Council v Tower Hamlets LBC
16. Herbert v Lambeth LBC
17. Jones v Walsall MBC
18. Leeds v Islington LBC
19. Lewisham LBC v Hall
20. Liverpool CC v Worthington
21. O’Toole v Knowlsley MBC
22. Pike v Sefton MBC
23. Quigley v Liverpool Housing Trust
24. R v Birmingham CC ex p Ireland, Baker v Birmingham CC, Hall v Kingston upon Hull CC
25. R v Dudley Magistrates’ Court ex p Hollis
26. R v Enfield Justices ex p Whittle
27. R v Highbury Corner Magistrates’ Court ex p Edwards
28. R v Liverpool Crown Court ex p Cooke
29. R v Southend Stipendiary Magistrate ex p Rochford DC
30. R (Anne) v Test Valley BC
31. R (Vella) v Lambeth LBC and London and Quadrant Housing Trust
32. Southwark LBC v Simpson
33. Taylor v Walsall and District Property and Investment Co
34. Health and Safety Executive v Hussain
35. Ozmus v West Hampstead Housing Association
36. Ashard v Islington LBC
37. Brown v Brent LBC
38. Crowe v Tower Hamlets LBC
39. Ogunlowo v Southwark LBC
40. Parry v Walsall MBC
41. Pringle v Hackney LBC
42. Queeney v Wolverhampton BC
43. Middlemast v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:assessment, no formal procedure on
1. R v Southend Stipendiary Magistrate ex p Rochford DC
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:compensation
1. Davenport v Walsall MBC
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:enforcement notices
1. Criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 and other Acts
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:evidence on noise
1. Lewisham LBC v Hall
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:experts
1. Southwark LBC v Simpson
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:failure to carry out works
1. Queeney v Wolverhampton BC
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:fines
1. Canterbury CC v Ferris
2. Health and Safety Executive v Hussain
3. Queeney v Wolverhampton BC
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:gas safety certificates, fines for not having
1. Health and Safety Executive v Hussain
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:guilty pleas
1. Davenport v Walsall MBC
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:heating
1. Carr v Hackney LBC
2. Farrar v Dover CC
3. Greater London Council v Tower Hamlets LBC
4. Pike v Sefton MBC
5. Pringle v Hackney LBC
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:housing associations as person responsible
1. Ozmus v West Hampstead Housing Association
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:likelihood of illness
1. R v Bristol CC ex p Everett
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:noise
1. Lewisham LBC v Hall
2. R (Vella) v Lambeth LBC and London and Quadrant Housing Trust
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:notice
1. Leeds v Islington LBC
2. R v Birmingham CC ex p Ireland, Baker v Birmingham CC, Hall v Kingston upon Hull CC
3. R v Liverpool Crown Court ex p Cooke
4. Taylor v Walsall and District Property and Investment Co
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:nuisance:abatement notices
1. Budd v Colchester BC
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:nuisance:access not given to abate nuisance
1. Jones v Walsall MBC
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:nuisance:barking dogs
1. Budd v Colchester BC
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:nuisance:costs
1. R v Dudley Magistrates’ Court ex p Hollis
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:nuisance:noise, acoustic evidence on
1. Lewisham LBC v Hall
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:nuisance:statutory
1. Criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 and other Acts
2. Cunningham v Birmingham CC
3. Farrar v Dover CC
4. Greater London Council v Tower Hamlets LBC
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:nuisance existing at time of complaints
1. R v Dudley Magistrates’ Court ex p Hollis
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:prejudicial to health
1. Criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 and other Acts
2. Birmingham CC v Oakley
3. R v Bristol CC ex p Everett
4. SFI Group plc v Gosport BC
5. O’Toole v Knowlsley MBC
6. R (Vella) v Lambeth LBC and London and Quadrant Housing Trust
7. Southwark LBC v Simpson
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:quashing costs orders
1. R v Enfield Justices ex p Whittle
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:recur, whether nuisance likely to
1. SFI Group plc v Gosport BC
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:refusal to move out, defence where
1. Quigley v Liverpool Housing Trust
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:remedial works
1. Criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 and other Acts
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:rent
1. Camden LBC v Gunby
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:rooms, arrangement of
1. Birmingham CC v Oakley
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:service of notice
1. Leeds v Islington LBC
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:settlement in criminal proceedings
1. Middlemast v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:sound insulation, lack of
1. R (Vella) v Lambeth LBC and London and Quadrant Housing Trust
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:specification of works
1. East Staffordshire BC v Fairless
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:statutory nuisance
1. Criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 and other Acts
2. Cunningham v Birmingham CC
3. East Staffordshire BC v Fairless
4. Farrar v Dover CC
5. Greater London Council v Tower Hamlets LBC
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:surveyors
1. Southwark LBC v Simpson
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:time limits
1. Liverpool CC v Worthington
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:toilets next to kitchens
1. Birmingham CC v Oakley
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:vexatious to issue summons as well as civil proceedings
1. R v Highbury Corner Magistrates’ Court ex p Edwards
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:works:adjournments for works
1. R v Dudley Magistrates’ Court ex p Hollis
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990:works:fines for failure to carry out works
1. Parry v Walsall MBC
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 :abatement notices
1. Budd v Colchester BC
2. R v Bristol CC ex p Everett
3. SFI Group plc v Gosport BC
4. Canterbury CC v Ferris
5. R (Anne) v Test Valley BC
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 :abatement orders
1. Ashard v Islington LBC
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 :access not given to abate nuisance
1. Jones v Walsall MBC
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 :accidents, risk of
1. R v Bristol CC ex p Everett
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 :acoustic evidence on noise
1. Lewisham LBC v Hall
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 :adjournments to allow works to be done
1. R v Dudley Magistrates’ Court ex p Hollis
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 :anxiety and stress, compensation for
1. Brown v Brent LBC
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 :background heating
1. Pringle v Hackney LBC
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 :barking dogs
1. Budd v Colchester BC
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 :case stated
1. Liverpool CC v Worthington
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 :civil proceedings
1. Issa v Hackney LBC
2. Middlemast v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 :clerks of local authorities, service of notices on
1. Leeds v Islington LBC
2. R v Birmingham CC ex p Ireland, Baker v Birmingham CC, Hall v Kingston upon Hull CC
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 :cockroach infestation
1. Ogunlowo v Southwark LBC
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 :compensation
1. Criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 and other Acts
2. Budd v Colchester BC
3. Botross v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
4. Davenport v Walsall MBC
5. Herbert v Lambeth LBC
6. R v Liverpool Crown Court ex p Cooke
7. Ashard v Islington LBC
8. Brown v Brent LBC
9. Ogunlowo v Southwark LBC
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 :compensation orders
1. Budd v Colchester BC
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 :condensation
1. Carr v Hackney LBC
2. Farrar v Dover CC
3. Pike v Sefton MBC
4. Ogunlowo v Southwark LBC
5. Pringle v Hackney LBC
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 :contingency fees:access not given to abate nuisance
1. Jones v Walsall MBC
criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 :contingency fees:advance notice
1. Taylor v Walsall and District Property and Investment Co
curtilage of buildings held for other purposes, within
1. Employees (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 2)
daily cleaning
1. Nelson Developments Ltd v Taboada
damages
1. Anufrijeva v Southwark LBC
2. R (Bernard) v Enfield LBC
damages:apologise, failure to
1. R (Bernard) v Enfield LBC
damages:counterclaims
1. Televantos v McCulloch
damages:delay
1. Anufrijeva v Southwark LBC
damages:discomfort and distress
1. Wallace v Manchester CC
damages:homelessness
1. R v Northavon DC ex p Palmer
damages:hotel rooms
1. Mehta v Royal Bank of Scotland
damages:injunctions
1. Southwark LBC v Storrie
damages:maladministration
1. Anufrijeva v Southwark LBC
damages:mesne profits
1. Mesne profits
2. Swordheath Properties Ltd v Tabet
damages:mitigation
1. Wandsworth LBC v Osei-Bonsu
damages:private and family life and home, right to respect for
1. Anufrijeva v Southwark LBC
2. R (Bernard) v Enfield LBC
damages:set-off
1. Damages
2. Ahmed v Southwark LBC
3. Berryman v Hounslow LBC
4. Brent LBC v Carmel (sued as Murphy)
5. Calabar Properties Ltd v Stitcher
6. Chiodi v De Marney
7. Davies v Peterson
8. Ezekiel v McDade
9. Irontrain Investments Ltd v Ansari
10. Lavimizadeh v Lambeth LBC
11. Lubren v Lambeth LBC
12. Marshall v Rubypoint Ltd
13. McGreal v Wake
14. Edlington Properties Ltd v Fenner & Co Ltd
15. Filross Securities v Midgeley
16. Maunder Taylor v Blaquiere
17. Muscat v Smith
18. Kaur v Gill
19. Nwokorie v Mason
damages:suitability of accommodation
1. R v Ealing LBC ex p Parkinson
2. R (Morris) v Newham LBC
3. R (Bernard) v Enfield LBC
dampness:damages
1. Lambeth LBC v Martin
2. Lewis v Courtney
3. Ogefere v Islington LBC
4. Thornton and Jarrett v Birmingham CC
dampness:damp-proof courses
1. Eyre v McCracken
2. Wainwright v Leeds CC
dampness:disrepair
1. Onwuama v Ealing LBC
2. Ball and Ball v Plymouth CC
3. Southwark LBC v McIntosh
4. Lambeth LBC v Martin
5. Lewis v Courtney
6. Ogefere v Islington LBC
7. Thornton and Jarrett v Birmingham CC
dampness:experts
1. Onwuama v Ealing LBC
dampness:exterior
1. Ball and Ball v Plymouth CC
2. Southwark LBC v McIntosh
dampness:structure
1. Ball and Ball v Plymouth CC
2. Southwark LBC v McIntosh
dangerous appliances, fines for
1. Health and Safety Executive v Hussain
death of tenants: security of tenure
1. Solihull MBC v Hickin
2. Kingston upon Thames RLBC v Prince
death of tenants:assured tenancies
1. Death of tenant
death of tenants:date for establishing residence requirement for succession
1. Wandsworth LBC v Randall
death of tenants:grounds for possession
1. Death of tenant
2. Shepping v Osada
3. Wandsworth LBC v Randall
death of tenants:secure tenancies
1. Death of tenant
2. Wandsworth LBC v Randall
death of tenants:security of tenure
1. Succession to secure tenancies
2. Austin v Southwark LBC
3. Birmingham CC v Walker
4. Waltham Forest LBC v Thomas
5. Bassetlaw DC v Renshaw
6. Brent LBC v Fofana
7. Epping Forest DC v Pomphrett
8. Islington LBC v Freeman
9. Marsh v Lewisham LBC
10. Michalak v Wandsworth LBC
11. Newham LBC v Phillips
12. Newham LBC v Ria
13. Peabody Donation Fund Governors v Grant
14. Sheffield CC v Wall
15. Sheffield CC v Wall (No 2)
16. Westminster CC v Peart
17. Sharp v Brent LBC
death of tenants:service of section 8 notices not proceedings for possession
1. Shepping v Osada
death of tenants:under-occupation
1. Death of tenant
death threats
1. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p P
2. R v Westminster CC ex p Iqbal
deception, homelessness and
1. R v Southwark LBC ex p Dagou
Defective Premises Act 1972
1. Defective Premises Act 1972
Defective Premises Act 1972:access/entry, right of
1. McAuley v Bristol CC
2. Wadsworth v Nagle
Defective Premises Act 1972:constructing premises, failure to carry out necessary works when
1. Andrews v Schooling
Defective Premises Act 1972:damage to property
1. Defective Premises Act 1972
Defective Premises Act 1972:disrepair
1. Defective Premises Act 1972
Defective Premises Act 1972:duty of care
1. Defective Premises Act 1972
Defective Premises Act 1972:extension of time limits
1. Alderson v Beetham Organisation Ltd
Defective Premises Act 1972:falls from patios
1. Smith v Bradford MDC
Defective Premises Act 1972:fitness for human habitation
1. McMinn Bole and Van Den Haak v Huntsbuild Ltd and Richard Money (t/a Richard Money Associates)
Defective Premises Act 1972:foundations, stability of
1. McMinn Bole and Van Den Haak v Huntsbuild Ltd and Richard Money (t/a Richard Money Associates)
Defective Premises Act 1972:garden steps, defects in
1. McAuley v Bristol CC
Defective Premises Act 1972:inspections
1. Morley v Knowsley BC
2. Clarke v Taff Ely BC
Defective Premises Act 1972:knowledge
1. Morley v Knowsley BC
Defective Premises Act 1972:maintenance
1. Alker v Collingwood Housing Association
Defective Premises Act 1972:notice, actual or constructive
1. Sykes v Harry
Defective Premises Act 1972:paving slabs leaning upright
1. Boldack (minor) v East Lindsey DC
Defective Premises Act 1972:personal injury
1. Defective Premises Act 1972
Defective Premises Act 1972:pipes, burns caused by hot
1. Boateng v Camden LBC
Defective Premises Act 1972:reasonable care
1. Defective Premises Act 1972
Defective Premises Act 1972:rectify damage, works undertaken to
1. Alderson v Beetham Organisation Ltd
Defective Premises Act 1972:safe, keeping property
1. Alker v Collingwood Housing Association
Defective Premises Act 1972:steps, defects in garden
1. McAuley v Bristol CC
Defective Premises Act 1972:time limits
1. Alderson v Beetham Organisation Ltd
Defective Premises Act 1972:windows, standards at time of installation and
1. Adams v Rhymney Valley DC
delay:asserting right to accommodation, delay in
1. Vyrovyy v Ukraine
delay:damages
1. Anufrijeva v Southwark LBC
delay:disrepair
1. Notice and delay in carrying out repairs
2. Morris v Liverpool CC
delay:enforcement
1. Palumbo v Italy
delay:eviction
1. Panteleeva v Ukraine
delay:fair hearing, right to a
1. Anderson v UK
2. Tsfayo v UK
3. Vyrovyy v Ukraine
4. Waltoś and Pawlicz v Poland
delay:fair hearing, right to a:asserting right to accommodation, delay in
1. Vyrovyy v Ukraine
delay:fair hearing, right to a:complexity
1. Anderson v UK
delay:fair hearing, right to a:enforcement
1. Palumbo v Italy
delay:fair hearing, right to a:eviction
1. Panteleeva v Ukraine
delay:fair hearing, right to a:Housing Benefit Review Board
1. Tsfayo v UK
delay:fair hearing, right to a:length of proceedings
1. Anderson v UK
delay:fair hearing, right to a:possession orders
1. Palumbo v Italy
2. Panteleeva v Ukraine
delay:fair hearing, right to a:reasons
1. Tsfayo v UK
delay:files, providing copies of housing
1. Goodger v Ealing LBC
delay:homelessness
1. R (Bantamagbari) v Westminster CC and Southwark LBC
2. R v Brent LBC ex p Miyanger
3. Goodger v Ealing LBC
4. R (C) v Lewisham LBC
delay:Housing Benefit Review Board
1. Tsfayo v UK
delay:length of proceedings
1. Anderson v UK
delay:local connection and referral, delay in decisions on
1. R (Bantamagbari) v Westminster CC and Southwark LBC
delay:possession orders
1. Palumbo v Italy
2. Panteleeva v Ukraine
3. Tower Hamlets LBC v Abadie
4. Southwark LBC v Sarfo
delay:private and family life and home, right to respect for
1. Anufrijeva v Southwark LBC
delay:reasons
1. Tsfayo v UK
demolition:demolished, age and character of premises such that it should be
1. Newham LBC v Patel
demolition:demolition or redevelopment, property required for
1. Temporary use pending development (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 3)
2. Attley v Cherwell DC
3. Hyde Housing Association Ltd v Harrison
4. Lillieshall Road Housing Co-operative Ltd v Brennan
5. Property required for demolition or redevelopment
6. Wansbeck DC v Marley
7. Sugarwhite v Afridi
demolition:demolition orders
1. Local authority enforcement
2. Noble v South Herefordshire DC
demoted tenancies
1. Manchester CC v Pinnock
demoted tenancies:necessary in a democratic society
1. Manchester CC v Pinnock
demoted tenancies:private and family life, right to respect for
1. Manchester CC v Pinnock
deposits:assured shorthold tenancies
1. Tenancy deposits and the Housing Act 2004
2. UK Housing Alliance (North West) Ltd v Francis
3. Draycott and Draycott v Hannells Letting Limited
deposits:authorised schemes
1. Tenancy deposits and the Housing Act 2004
deposits:Housing Act 2004
1. Tenancy deposits and the Housing Act 2004
2. UK Housing Alliance (North West) Ltd v Francis
3. Draycott and Draycott v Hannells Letting Limited
deposits:letting agents, claims against
1. Draycott and Draycott v Hannells Letting Limited
deposits:prescribed information, provision of
1. Tenancy deposits and the Housing Act 2004
deposits:purchase price not a deposit, payment of 30% of
1. UK Housing Alliance (North West) Ltd v Francis
deposits:section 21 notices, effect on
1. Tenancy deposits and the Housing Act 2004
deposits:time limits
1. Draycott and Draycott v Hannells Letting Limited
depression
1. McCarthy v Khosla
2. Smyth v Farnworth
design defects
1. Stent v Monmouth DC
2. Rimmer v Liverpool CC
3. Targett v Torfaen BC
destitution:asylum seekers:National Assistance Act 1948
1. Introduction
destitution:community care
1. Introduction
destitution:National Assistance Act 1948:asylum seekers
1. Introduction
development, temporary use pending
1. Temporary use pending development (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 3)
2. Attley v Cherwell DC
3. Hyde Housing Association Ltd v Harrison
4. Lillieshall Road Housing Co-operative Ltd v Brennan
diminution in value, damages for
1. Damages
2. Calabar Properties Ltd v Stitcher
3. Wallace v Manchester CC
direct payments
1. Second WRVS Housing Society v Blair
disabled persons:adaptations
1. Boreh v Ealing LBC
disabled persons:carers
1. Ali v Camden LBC
disabled persons:disability discrimination
1. Equality Act 2010
2. Pieretti v Enfield LBC
disabled persons:disability living allowance
1. Ali v Camden LBC
disabled persons:Equality Act 2010
1. Equality Act 2010
disabled persons:homelessness
1. Pieretti v Enfield LBC
2. Barrett v Southwark LBC
disabled persons:severe disability for benefit purposes, assessment of
1. Mangion v Lewisham LBC
disabled persons:time limits where persons have problems finding solicitors
1. Barrett v Southwark LBC
disasters, meaning of
1. Noble v South Herefordshire DC
discomfort and distress, damages for
1. Wallace v Manchester CC
discretion:allocation
1. General
discretion:appeals
1. Brookes v Croydon LBC
2. Francis v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
3. Lewis v Havering LBC
4. R v Brighton and Hove Council ex p Nacion
discretion:breach of obligations as ground for possession
1. Breach of obligation
discretion:breach of obligations as ground for possession:mortgage possession proceedings
1. Southern and District Finance plc v Barnes
discretion:fettering discretion
1. General
discretion:former employees
1. Former employees
discretion:homelessness
1. Rowley v Rugby BC
discretion:homelessness:local connection and referral
1. Local connection and referral
2. R v East Devon DC ex p Robb
discretion:interim possession orders
1. Metropolitan Housing Trust v Ali and Persons Unknown
2. Shropshire CC v Wynne
discretion:local connection and referral
1. Local connection and referral
2. R v East Devon DC ex p Robb
discretion:mortgage possession proceedings
1. Southern and District Finance plc v Barnes
discretion:notice seeking possession
1. Kelsey Housing Association v King
2. Knowsley Housing Trust v Revell; Helena Housing Ltd v Curtis
3. McShane v William Sutton Trust
discretion:nuisance and annoyance
1. Anti-social behaviour
discretion:pending appeals, discretion to accommodate
1. Brookes v Croydon LBC
2. Francis v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
3. Lewis v Havering LBC
4. R v Brighton and Hove Council ex p Nacion
discretion:pending reviews, accommodation
1. R v Camden LBC ex p Mohammed
2. R v Newham LBC ex p Lumley
3. R (Abdi) v Lambeth LBC
4. R (Antoine) v Reigate and Banstead DC and First Secretary of State
5. R (Araya) v Leeds CC
6. R (Hassan) v Croydon LBC
7. R (Paul-Coker) v Southwark LBC
discretion:possession orders
1. Introduction and general considerations
2. Metropolitan Housing Trust v Ali and Persons Unknown
3. Shropshire CC v Wynne
4. Dunn v Bradford MDC; Marston v Leeds CC
5. Vandermolen v Toma
discretion:rent arrears
1. Rent arrears
2. Rent arrears (Housing Act 1988 Sch 2 Grounds 8, 10 and 11)
3. Artesian Residential Investments Ltd v Beck
4. Baygreen Properties Ltd v Gil
5. Bessa Plus v Lancaster
6. Capital Prime Plus plc v Wills
7. Day v Coltrane
8. Leadenhall Residential 2 Ltd v Stirling
9. North British Housing Association Limited v Matthews
10. R (Weaver) v London & Quadrant Housing Trust
11. Diab v Countrywide Rentals 1 plc
12. Etherington v Burt
13. Milecastle Housing Ltd v Walton
discretion:revival of tenancies
1. Dunn v Bradford MDC; Marston v Leeds CC
discretion:subletting whole of premises
1. Subletting the whole of premises
discretion:suspension of possession orders
1. McPhail v Persons Unknown
2. Vandermolen v Toma
discrimination:Article 14, prohibition of
1. Connors v UK
2. Karner v Austria
3. Korelc v Slovenia
4. Kozak v Poland
5. Larkos v Cyprus
discrimination:disability discrimination
1. Equality Act 2010
2. Pieretti v Enfield LBC
discrimination:Equality Act 2010
1. Equality Act 2010
discrimination:homelessness
1. Pieretti v Enfield LBC
discrimination:possession orders
2. Equality Act 2010
3. Southwark LBC v St Brice
discrimination:public health and environmental protection
1. Bolton MBC v Patel
discrimination:reasonableness of possession orders
1. Equality Act 2010
discrimination:sexual orientation discrimination
1. Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza
discrimination:succession
1. Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza
disrepair, damages for
1. Damages
2. Ahmed v Southwark LBC
3. Berryman v Hounslow LBC
4. Brent LBC v Carmel (sued as Murphy)
5. Calabar Properties Ltd v Stitcher
6. Chiodi v De Marney
7. Davies v Peterson
8. Ezekiel v McDade
9. Irontrain Investments Ltd v Ansari
10. Lavimizadeh v Lambeth LBC
11. Lubren v Lambeth LBC
12. Marshall v Rubypoint Ltd
13. McGreal v Wake
14. Minchburn v Peck
15. Mira v Aylmer Square Investments Ltd
16. Shine v English Churches Housing Group
17. Sturolson and Co v Mauroux
18. Wallace v Manchester CC
19. Electricity Supply Nominees Ltd v National Magazine Co Ltd
20. Aslam v Ali
21. Conroy v Hire Token Ltd
22. Fakhari v Newman
23. Ferguson v Jones
24. Festusi Porbeni v Abdellaziz Chaabdiss
25. Lambeth LBC v Martin
26. Lewis v Courtney
27. London & Quadrant Housing Trust v Riemy
28. McCarthy v Khosla
29. Murray v Kelly
30. Mzae v Abigo
31. O’Beirne v Lambeth LBC
32. Ogefere v Islington LBC
33. Ontas v Pathmeads HA
34. Pierce v Westminster CC
35. Sarmad v Okello
36. Smyth v Farnworth
37. Switzer v Law
38. Symons v Warren
39. Thornton and Jarrett v Birmingham CC
40. Vergara v Lambeth LBC and Hyde Southbank Homes
disrepair, damages for:aggravated damages
1. Festusi Porbeni v Abdellaziz Chaabdiss
disrepair, damages for:alternative accommodation
1. Lubren v Lambeth LBC
2. McGreal v Wake
disrepair, damages for:appeals
1. Brent LBC v Carmel (sued as Murphy)
2. Davies v Peterson
disrepair, damages for:arbitration
1. Ahmed v Southwark LBC
disrepair, damages for:assessment:17 months tenancies
1. Ontas v Pathmeads HA
disrepair, damages for:assessment:coughs and colds
1. Conroy v Hire Token Ltd
disrepair, damages for:assessment:dampness
1. Thornton and Jarrett v Birmingham CC
disrepair, damages for:assessment:diminution in value
1. Wallace v Manchester CC
disrepair, damages for:assessment:discomfort
1. Wallace v Manchester CC
disrepair, damages for:assessment:general damages
1. Chiodi v De Marney
disrepair, damages for:assessment:harassment
1. Festusi Porbeni v Abdellaziz Chaabdiss
disrepair, damages for:assessment:mice infestation
1. London & Quadrant Housing Trust v Riemy
disrepair, damages for:assessment:notices, ignoring
1. Festusi Porbeni v Abdellaziz Chaabdiss
disrepair, damages for:assessment:nuisance
1. Vergara v Lambeth LBC and Hyde Southbank Homes
disrepair, damages for:assessment:rent
1. Aslam v Ali
2. Murray v Kelly
3. Mzae v Abigo
disrepair, damages for:bathrooms, lights in
1. Symons v Warren
disrepair, damages for:boilers, breakdown of
1. Fakhari v Newman
disrepair, damages for:burglary due to failure to repair front doors, landlords liable for
1. Marshall v Rubypoint Ltd
disrepair, damages for:children:coughs and colds
1. Conroy v Hire Token Ltd
disrepair, damages for:children:personal injury
1. Conroy v Hire Token Ltd
disrepair, damages for:clean up
1. McGreal v Wake
disrepair, damages for:condensation
1. Switzer v Law
disrepair, damages for:contributory negligence
1. Damages
disrepair, damages for:cooker, lack of
1. Ferguson v Jones
disrepair, damages for:coughs and colds
1. Conroy v Hire Token Ltd
disrepair, damages for:counterclaims
1. Set-off and counterclaim
disrepair, damages for:cracks
1. Pierce v Westminster CC
disrepair, damages for:dampness
1. Lambeth LBC v Martin
2. Lewis v Courtney
3. Ogefere v Islington LBC
4. Thornton and Jarrett v Birmingham CC
disrepair, damages for:depression
1. McCarthy v Khosla
2. Smyth v Farnworth
disrepair, damages for:diminution in value
1. Damages
2. Calabar Properties Ltd v Stitcher
3. Wallace v Manchester CC
disrepair, damages for:discomfort
1. Wallace v Manchester CC
disrepair, damages for:doors, failure to repair front
1. Marshall v Rubypoint Ltd
disrepair, damages for:draughty windows
1. Fakhari v Newman
disrepair, damages for:excessive awards
1. Brent LBC v Carmel (sued as Murphy)
disrepair, damages for:exemplary damages
1. Festusi Porbeni v Abdellaziz Chaabdiss
disrepair, damages for:extractor fans
1. Switzer v Law
2. Symons v Warren
disrepair, damages for:fair rent, registration of
1. Sturolson and Co v Mauroux
disrepair, damages for:flooding
1. Lambeth LBC v Martin
disrepair, damages for:foreseeability
1. Lavimizadeh v Lambeth LBC
2. Mira v Aylmer Square Investments Ltd
disrepair, damages for:general damages
1. Chiodi v De Marney
disrepair, damages for:harassment
1. Festusi Porbeni v Abdellaziz Chaabdiss
2. Arabhalvaei v Rezaeipoor
disrepair, damages for:heating
1. Ferguson v Jones
2. Sarmad v Okello
disrepair, damages for:hot water
1. Ferguson v Jones
2. Sarmad v Okello
disrepair, damages for:housing benefit
1. Wallace v Manchester CC
disrepair, damages for:inconvenience and discomfort
1. Damages
disrepair, damages for:inflation
1. Damages
disrepair, damages for:joint tenants
1. O’Beirne v Lambeth LBC
disrepair, damages for:lifts
1. Berryman v Hounslow LBC
2. Electricity Supply Nominees Ltd v National Magazine Co Ltd
disrepair, damages for:lights
1. Symons v Warren
disrepair, damages for:maintenance of lifts
1. Berryman v Hounslow LBC
disrepair, damages for:mice infestation
1. London & Quadrant Housing Trust v Riemy
disrepair, damages for:mitigation
1. Damages
disrepair, damages for:nominal damages
1. Davies v Peterson
disrepair, damages for:notice
1. Minchburn v Peck
2. Festusi Porbeni v Abdellaziz Chaabdiss
disrepair, damages for:nuisance
1. Vergara v Lambeth LBC and Hyde Southbank Homes
disrepair, damages for:personal injury
1. Lavimizadeh v Lambeth LBC
2. Conroy v Hire Token Ltd
disrepair, damages for:quiet enjoyment, covenant of
1. Thornton and Jarrett v Birmingham CC
disrepair, damages for:rat infestation in drains
1. Sarmad v Okello
disrepair, damages for:redecoration after repairs
1. McGreal v Wake
disrepair, damages for:rent:40% of rent
1. Mzae v Abigo
disrepair, damages for:rent:50% of rent
1. Aslam v Ali
disrepair, damages for:rent:assessment
1. Aslam v Ali
2. Murray v Kelly
3. Mzae v Abigo
disrepair, damages for:rent:different items based on rent
1. Murray v Kelly
disrepair, damages for:rent:exceed rent, damages should not
1. Shine v English Churches Housing Group
disrepair, damages for:rent:fair rent, registration of
1. Sturolson and Co v Mauroux
disrepair, damages for:rent:foreseeable, loss of rent as
1. Mira v Aylmer Square Investments Ltd
disrepair, damages for:rent:housing benefit
1. Wallace v Manchester CC
disrepair, damages for:rent:lifts
1. Electricity Supply Nominees Ltd v National Magazine Co Ltd
disrepair, damages for:rent:loss of rental income
1. Irontrain Investments Ltd v Ansari
2. Mira v Aylmer Square Investments Ltd
disrepair, damages for:tariff for disrepair
1. Wallace v Manchester CC
disrepair, damages for:temporary accommodation, unsuitable
1. Ezekiel v McDade
disrepair, damages for:water:condensation exacerbated by water penetration
1. Switzer v Law
disrepair, damages for:water:dampness from water penetration
1. Lewis v Courtney
disrepair, damages for:water:extractor fans
1. Switzer v Law
disrepair, damages for:water:joint tenants separately entitled to damages for water penetration
1. O’Beirne v Lambeth LBC
disrepair, damages for:windows
1. Lavimizadeh v Lambeth LBC
2. Fakhari v Newman
disrepair:abuse, later claims not
1. Henley v Bloom
disrepair:access to premises
1. Empson v Forde
disrepair:allocation to track
1. Birmingham CC v Lee
disrepair:assignment
1. Muscat v Smith
disrepair:banisters
1. Walker v Nottingham CC
disrepair:builders, liability of landlords as
1. Rimmer v Liverpool CC
2. Targett v Torfaen BC
disrepair:building works
1. Lambert v Barratt Homes Ltd and Rochdale MBC
2. D & F Estates Ltd v Church Commissioners
disrepair:burst pipes
1. Passley v Wandsworth LBC
disrepair:children
1. Murphy and Peers v Stockport MBC
2. Stevens v Blaenau Gwent CBC
3. Hooton v Liverpool CC
disrepair:cockroach infestation
1. Habinteg Housing Association v James
2. Sharpe v Manchester MDC
disrepair:common parts
1. Habinteg Housing Association v James
disrepair:contractual liability
1. Liability in contract
disrepair:costs
1. Birmingham CC v Lee
2. Connell v Hackney LBC
disrepair:counterclaims
1. Henley v Bloom
2. Set-off and counterclaim
3. Televantos v McCulloch
4. British Anzani (Felixstowe) Ltd v International Marine Management (UK) Ltd
disrepair:covenants:express
1. Liability in contract
disrepair:covenants:implied
1. Liability in contract
2. Implied covenants
3. Liverpool CC v Irwin
4. Southwark LBC v Mills; Southwark LBC v Tanner; Baxter v Camden LBC
5. Adami v Lincoln Grange Management Ltd
6. Barrett v Lounova (1982) Ltd
7. Demetriou v Poolaction Ltd
8. Gordon and Texeira v Selico Ltd and Select Managements Ltd
9. King v South Northamptonshire DC
10. Lee v Leeds CC
disrepair:dampness
1. Onwuama v Ealing LBC
disrepair:Defective Premises Act 1972
1. Defective Premises Act 1972
disrepair:delay
1. Notice and delay in carrying out repairs
2. Morris v Liverpool CC
disrepair:design defects caused by landlords
1. Rimmer v Liverpool CC
2. Targett v Torfaen BC
disrepair:discrimination
1. R (Erskine) v Lambeth LBC
disrepair:doors, delay in securing front
1. Morris v Liverpool CC
disrepair:duty of care
1. Stockley v Knowsley MBC
2. Hawkins v Dhawan
disrepair:equitable jurisdiction
1. Filross Securities v Midgeley
disrepair:estoppel
1. Onwuama v Ealing LBC
disrepair:exclusion terms
1. Connaught Restaurants Ltd v Indoor Leisure Ltd
disrepair:exclusive possession
1. Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd
disrepair:expenses
1. Lee-Parker v Izzet
disrepair:experts
1. Onwuama v Ealing LBC
disrepair:fines
1. Connell v Hackney LBC
2. Mullen v Hackney LBC
disrepair:flooding
1. Passley v Wandsworth LBC
2. Lambert v Barratt Homes Ltd and Rochdale MBC
disrepair:fresh claims
1. Onwuama v Ealing LBC
disrepair:frozen pipes
1. Stockley v Knowsley MBC
disrepair:grounds for possession
1. Empson v Forde
disrepair:inherent defects
1. Targett v Torfaen BC
disrepair:injunctions:children, threats to welfare of
1. Hooton v Liverpool CC
disrepair:injunctions:exceptional circumstances
1. Parker v Camden LBC
disrepair:injunctions:general principles
1. Redland Bricks Ltd v Morris
disrepair:injunctions:interlocutory
1. Redland Bricks Ltd v Morris
2. Parker v Camden LBC
3. Hooton v Liverpool CC
disrepair:injunctions:mandatory injunctions
1. R v Wandsworth County Court ex p Munn
2. Redland Bricks Ltd v Morris
3. Parker v Camden LBC
disrepair:injunctions:penal notices, endorsement of
1. R v Wandsworth County Court ex p Munn
disrepair:injunctions:serious disrepair
1. Hooton v Liverpool CC
disrepair:injunctions:staircases in danger of collapse
1. Sheriden v Broadbridge
disrepair:injunctions:urgent cases
1. Interim injunctions
disrepair:knowledge
1. Notice and delay in carrying out repairs
2. O’Brien v Robinson
3. Dinefwr BC v Jones
4. Stockley v Knowsley MBC
disrepair:letters from solicitors as notice
1. Al Hassani v Merrigan
disrepair:low standard accommodation, liability in negligence for
1. McNerny v Lambeth LBC
disrepair:managers, appointment of
1. Maunder Taylor v Blaquiere
disrepair:negligence:banisters
1. Walker v Nottingham CC
disrepair:negligence:builders and designers, liability of landlords as
1. Rimmer v Liverpool CC
2. Targett v Torfaen BC
disrepair:negligence:building subcontractors
1. D & F Estates Ltd v Church Commissioners
disrepair:negligence:cockroach infestation
1. Sharpe v Manchester MDC
disrepair:negligence:duty of care
1. Stockley v Knowsley MBC
2. Hawkins v Dhawan
disrepair:negligence:low standard accommodation
1. McNerny v Lambeth LBC
disrepair:negligence:paths
1. Lips v Older
disrepair:negligence:pipe overflows
1. Hawkins v Dhawan
disrepair:notice
1. Notice and delay in carrying out repairs
2. O’Brien v Robinson
3. Al Hassani v Merrigan
4. British Telecommunications plc v Sun Life Assurance Society plc
5. Dinefwr BC v Jones
6. Hall v Howard
7. Morris v Liverpool CC
8. Passley v Wandsworth LBC
9. Sheldon v West Bromwich Corporation
10. Loria v Hammer
11. Bavage v Southwark LBC
disrepair:notice:flooding
1. Passley v Wandsworth LBC
disrepair:notice:knowledge
1. Notice and delay in carrying out repairs
2. O’Brien v Robinson
3. Dinefwr BC v Jones
disrepair:notice:public health and environmental protection
1. Gwynedd CC v Grunshaw
2. Local authority enforcement
3. Pollway Nominees Ltd v Croydon LBC
4. R v Cardiff CC ex p Cross
5. R v Mansfield DC ex p Ashfield Nominees
6. R (Erskine) v Lambeth LBC
7. Bolton MBC v Patel
8. Hanley v Tameside MBC
disrepair:notice:roof not in tenant’s lettings, where defect in water tanks in
1. Loria v Hammer
disrepair:notice:sewage, liability without notice for backsurge in
1. Bavage v Southwark LBC
disrepair:notice:solicitors’ letters
1. Al Hassani v Merrigan
disrepair:notice:surveyors’ valuation reports, details of defects in
1. Hall v Howard
disrepair:notice:water in old tanks, discolouration of
1. Sheldon v West Bromwich Corporation
disrepair:notice:without notice, liability
1. Passley v Wandsworth LBC
disrepair:nuisance:cockroach infestation
1. Habinteg Housing Association v James
2. Sharpe v Manchester MDC
disrepair:nuisance:exclusive possession
1. Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd
disrepair:nuisance:flooding
1. Lambert v Barratt Homes Ltd and Rochdale MBC
disrepair:nuisance:television reception
1. Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd
disrepair:overflows
1. Hawkins v Dhawan
disrepair:patch repairs to roofs
1. Dame Margaret Hungerford Charity Trustees v Beazeley
2. Murray v Birmingham CC
disrepair:paths, dangerous
1. Lips v Older
disrepair:penal notices on mandatory injunctions, endorsement of
1. R v Wandsworth County Court ex p Munn
disrepair:personal injury claims
1. Millington v Islington LBC
2. Stevens v Blaenau Gwent CBC
disrepair:pipes
1. Passley v Wandsworth LBC
2. Stockley v Knowsley MBC
3. Hawkins v Dhawan
disrepair:plaster
1. Hussein v Mehlman
disrepair:possession:grounds
1. Empson v Forde
disrepair:possession:orders
1. Empson v Forde
disrepair:possession:proceedings
1. Televantos v McCulloch
disrepair:pre-action protocol
1. Birmingham CC v Lee
disrepair:public health and environmental protection
1. Gwynedd CC v Grunshaw
2. Local authority enforcement
3. Pollway Nominees Ltd v Croydon LBC
4. R v Cardiff CC ex p Cross
5. R v Mansfield DC ex p Ashfield Nominees
6. R (Erskine) v Lambeth LBC
7. Bolton MBC v Patel
8. Hanley v Tameside MBC
disrepair:reasonable time for works
1. Notice and delay in carrying out repairs
disrepair:rent
1. Muscat v Smith
2. British Anzani (Felixstowe) Ltd v International Marine Management (UK) Ltd
3. Lee-Parker v Izzet
disrepair:repudiatory breach
1. Hussein v Mehlman
disrepair:res judicata
1. Chin v Hackney LBC
2. Onwuama v Ealing LBC
disrepair:roofs
1. Dame Margaret Hungerford Charity Trustees v Beazeley
2. Murray v Birmingham CC
3. Loria v Hammer
disrepair:roots of trees, highway authorities responsible for
1. Delaware Mansions Ltd v City of Westminster
disrepair:service charges
1. Mullaney v Maybourne Grange (Croydon) Management Co Ltd
2. Holding and Management Ltd v Property Holding and Investment Trust plc
disrepair:set-off
1. Damages
2. Ahmed v Southwark LBC
3. Berryman v Hounslow LBC
4. Brent LBC v Carmel (sued as Murphy)
5. Calabar Properties Ltd v Stitcher
6. Chiodi v De Marney
7. Davies v Peterson
8. Ezekiel v McDade
9. Irontrain Investments Ltd v Ansari
10. Lavimizadeh v Lambeth LBC
11. Lubren v Lambeth LBC
12. Marshall v Rubypoint Ltd
13. McGreal v Wake
14. Edlington Properties Ltd v Fenner & Co Ltd
15. Filross Securities v Midgeley
16. Maunder Taylor v Blaquiere
17. Muscat v Smith
disrepair:settlements
1. Chin v Hackney LBC
disrepair:sewage, liability without notice for backsurge in
1. Bavage v Southwark LBC
disrepair:specific performance
1. Rainbow Estates v Tokenhold Ltd
disrepair:staircases in danger of collapse
1. Sheriden v Broadbridge
disrepair:steps, inherently dangerous
1. Targett v Torfaen BC
disrepair:structure
1. Hussein v Mehlman
disrepair:subcontractors
1. D & F Estates Ltd v Church Commissioners
disrepair:succession
1. Muscat v Smith
disrepair:surveyors’ valuation reports as notice, details of defects in
1. Hall v Howard
disrepair:television reception, disruption to
1. Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd
disrepair:time limits
1. Millington v Islington LBC
2. Filross Securities v Midgeley
disrepair:tortious liability
1. Delaware Mansions Ltd v City of Westminster
2. Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd
3. Habinteg Housing Association v James
4. Lambert v Barratt Homes Ltd and Rochdale MBC
5. Sharpe v Manchester MDC
6. D & F Estates Ltd v Church Commissioners
7. McNerny v Lambeth LBC
8. Rimmer v Liverpool CC
9. Stevens v Blaenau Gwent CBC
10. Stockley v Knowsley MBC
11. Targett v Torfaen BC
12. Lips v Older
13. Walker v Nottingham CC
14. Hawkins v Dhawan
disrepair:undertakings to carry out works
1. Court orders and undertakings to carry out works
2. Connell v Hackney LBC
3. Mullen v Hackney LBC
4. R v Wandsworth County Court ex p Munn
5. Rainbow Estates v Tokenhold Ltd
disrepair:unfair contract terms, exclusion clauses and
1. Set-off and counterclaim
2. Cody v Philps
disrepair:urgent cases, injunctions in
1. Interim injunctions
disrepair:water in old tanks, discolouration of
1. Sheldon v West Bromwich Corporation
disrepair:windows
1. Stevens v Blaenau Gwent CBC
distress, damages for
1. Wallace v Manchester CC
dogs:barking
1. Budd v Colchester BC
dogs:injunctions against keeping dogs
1. Sutton Housing Trust v Lawrence
dogs:nuisance and annoyance
1. Sheffield CC v Green
2. Sheffield CC v Jepson
3. Budd v Colchester BC
domestic violence
1. Camden LBC v Mallett
2. Metropolitan Housing Trust v Hadjazi
domestic violence:abuse leading to psychological harm
1. Yemshaw v Hounslow LBC
domestic violence:continued occupation, reasonableness of
1. Yemshaw v Hounslow LBC
2. Bond v Leicester CC
3. R v Croydon LBC ex p Toth
4. R v Newham LBC ex p McIlroy
domestic violence:damages, mitigation of
1. Wandsworth LBC v Osei-Bonsu
domestic violence:dominant cause of departure
1. Camden LBC v Mallett
domestic violence:grounds for possession
1. Camden LBC v Mallett
2. Metropolitan Housing Trust v Hadjazi
domestic violence:harassment and illegal eviction, damages for
1. Wandsworth LBC v Osei-Bonsu
domestic violence:homelessness:continued occupation, reasonableness of
1. Yemshaw v Hounslow LBC
2. Bond v Leicester CC
3. R v Croydon LBC ex p Toth
4. R v Newham LBC ex p McIlroy
domestic violence:homelessness:perverse placement in
1. R v Haringey LBC ex p Karaman
domestic violence:homelessness:threats
1. Reasonable to continue to occupy: s175(3)
domestic violence:not living together at time, where parties
1. Metropolitan Housing Trust v Hadjazi
domestic violence:notice to quit, requirement to serve
1. R (Hammia) v Wandsworth LBC
domestic violence:police protection, seeking
1. R v Croydon LBC ex p Toth
domestic violence:probability of violence
1. Bond v Leicester CC
domestic violence:psychological harm
1. Yemshaw v Hounslow LBC
domestic violence:threats
1. Reasonable to continue to occupy: s175(3)
domestic violence:urgent transfers, tenants could have stayed
1. R v Newham LBC ex p McIlroy
domestic violence:women’s refuges
1. R v Ealing LBC ex p Sidhu
2. Birmingham CC v Ali and Aweys; Moran v Manchester CC
doors:burglary resulting from failure to repair doors
1. Marshall v Rubypoint Ltd
doors:delay in securing front doors
1. Morris v Liverpool CC
doors:disrepair
1. Stent v Monmouth DC
2. Morris v Liverpool CC
drugs:allocation
1. Dixon v Wandsworth LBC
drugs:eligible persons
1. Dixon v Wandsworth LBC
drugs:homelessness
1. Crossley v Westminster CC
drugs:nuisance and annoyance
1. North Devon Homes Ltd v Batchelor
2. Knowsley Housing Trust v Prescott
drugs:priority need
1. Crossley v Westminster CC
drugs:suspension of warrants before execution
1. Stonebridge HAT v Gabbidon
drugs:vulnerable persons
1. Crossley v Westminster CC
dwelling, definition of
1. Uratemp Ventures Ltd v Collins
EEA nationals :dependants
1. Zambrano v Office National de l’Emploi
EEA nationals :homelessness
1. Zambrano v Office National de l’Emploi
2. R (Burns) v Southwark LBC
3. R (Mohamed) v Harrow LBC
EEA nationals :resident permits, refusal of
1. R (Burns) v Southwark LBC
EEA nationals :right to reside
1. Zambrano v Office National de l’Emploi
2. R (Mohamed) v Harrow LBC
EEA nationals :unemployed
1. R (Mohamed) v Harrow LBC
effective remedy, right to an
1. Panteleeva v Ukraine
employees and employment:exclusive possession
1. Licences – occupation granted to employees
employees and employment:factual nexus between occupation and employment
1. Norris v Checksfield
employees and employment:farm workers need no longer pay rent, agreements that
1. Foster v Robinson
employees and employment:former employees
1. Former employees
2. Duncan v Hay
3. Whitbread West Pennines Ltd v Reedy
employees and employment:grounds for possession
1. Former employees
2. Duncan v Hay
3. Agricultural employees
4. Fowler v Minchin
5. Springfield Investments Ltd v Bell
employees and employment:homelessness
1. R (Mohamed) v Harrow LBC
2. R v Portsmouth CC ex p Knight
3. Aw-Aden v Birmingham CC
4. R v Winchester CC ex p Ashton
5. Watchman v Ipswich BC
6. Mohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
employees and employment:implied terms
1. Hughes v Greenwich LBC
2. Surrey CC v Lamond
employees and employment:informal arrangements
1. Royal Philanthropic Society v County
employees and employment:intentional homelessness
1. R v Winchester CC ex p Ashton
employees and employment:key-holders
1. Brent LBC v Charles
employees and employment:licences
1. Licences – occupation granted to employees
2. Norris v Checksfield
3. Postcastle Properties v Perridge
4. Royal Philanthropic Society v County
employees and employment:live in accommodation, requirement to
1. Brent LBC v Charles
employees and employment:low rent under informal arrangements
1. Royal Philanthropic Society v County
employees and employment:notice to quit when employment terminated
1. Norris v Checksfield
employees and employment:notices for possession, invalidity of
1. Fowler v Minchin
2. Springfield Investments Ltd v Bell
employees and employment:police, rent and rate free accommodation for
1. Holmes v South Yorkshire Police Authority
employees and employment:possession:agricultural employees
1. Agricultural employees
2. Fowler v Minchin
3. Springfield Investments Ltd v Bell
employees and employment:possession:grounds for possession
1. Licences – occupation granted to employees
2. Agricultural employees
3. Fowler v Minchin
4. Springfield Investments Ltd v Bell
employees and employment:possession:licences
1. Licences – occupation granted to employees
employees and employment:possession:notices for possession, invalidity of
1. Fowler v Minchin
2. Springfield Investments Ltd v Bell
employees and employment:promotion, loss of accommodation due to
1. Elvidge v Coventry CC
employees and employment:proximity to work
1. Yewbright Properties Ltd v Stone
2. Rosemary Estates Ltd v Connolly
employees and employment:rates, free of
1. Holmes v South Yorkshire Police Authority
employees and employment:redundancy, relevance of
1. Brent LBC v Charles
employees and employment:rent
1. Holmes v South Yorkshire Police Authority
employees and employment:Rent Act tenancies
1. Licences – occupation granted to employees
2. Former employees
3. Agricultural employees
employees and employment:right to buy
1. Employees (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 2)
employees and employment:school caretakers
1. Surrey CC v Lamond
employees and employment:secure tenancies
1. Former employees
employees and employment:security of tenure
1. Employees (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 2)
2. Hughes v Greenwich LBC
3. Brent LBC v Charles
4. Elvidge v Coventry CC
5. Greenfield v Berkshire CC
6. Holmes v South Yorkshire Police Authority
7. South Glamorgan CC v Griffiths
8. Surrey CC v Lamond
9. Godsmark v Greenwich LBC
10. Wragg v Surrey CC
employees and employment:settled accommodation
1. Watchman v Ipswich BC
employees and employment:shams
1. Godsmark v Greenwich LBC
employees and employment:suitable alternative accommodation
1. Yewbright Properties Ltd v Stone
2. Rosemary Estates Ltd v Connolly
employees and employment:surrender
1. Foster v Robinson
employees and employment:termination of employment
1. Norris v Checksfield
2. Postcastle Properties v Perridge
employees and employment:termination of requirement to occupy a particular property
1. Greenfield v Berkshire CC
employees and employment:trespassers
1. Whitbread West Pennines Ltd v Reedy
2. R v Portsmouth CC ex p Knight
employees and employment:unemployed
1. R (Mohamed) v Harrow LBC
employees and employment:unfair dismissal
1. Whitbread West Pennines Ltd v Reedy
employees and employment:unpaid work
1. Mohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
employees and employment:work in UK, prospects of finding
1. Aw-Aden v Birmingham CC
employees and employment:workers, definition of
1. Barry v Southwark LBC
employees and employment:working holidays
1. McHale v Daneham
employees and employment :abroad, accommodation situated
1. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Duro-Rama
employees and employment :agricultural employees:farm workers need no longer pay rent, agreements that
1. Foster v Robinson
employees and employment :agricultural employees:grounds for possession
1. Agricultural employees
2. Fowler v Minchin
3. Springfield Investments Ltd v Bell
employees and employment :agricultural employees:notices for possession, invalidity of
1. Fowler v Minchin
2. Springfield Investments Ltd v Bell
employees and employment :agricultural employees:Rent Act tenancies
1. Agricultural employees
employees and employment :agricultural employees:surrender
1. Foster v Robinson
employees and employment :assured tenancies
1. Licences – occupation granted to employees
2. Former employees
employees and employment :better performance of reasons
1. Employees (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 2)
2. Hughes v Greenwich LBC
3. Wragg v Surrey CC
employees and employment :capacity, employment in a different
1. Duncan v Hay
employees and employment :change of accommodation and landlords
1. Godsmark v Greenwich LBC
employees and employment :change of owners
1. Postcastle Properties v Perridge
employees and employment :circumstances, examination of all the
1. Wragg v Surrey CC
employees and employment :compelling reason for implied term that premises occupied for better performance of duties
1. Hughes v Greenwich LBC
employees and employment :continued occupation, reasonableness of
1. R v Portsmouth CC ex p Knight
employees and employment :contracts of employment
1. Employees (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 2)
2. Brent LBC v Charles
3. Elvidge v Coventry CC
employees and employment :curtilage of building held for mainly non-housing purposes, within the
1. Employees (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 2)
employees and employment :EEA nationals
1. R (Mohamed) v Harrow LBC
endowment mortgages
1. Bank of Scotland v Grimes
enforcement notices
1. Criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 and other Acts
environmental health officers
1. O’Toole v Knowlsley MBC
Equality Act 2010
2. Equality Act 2010
Equality Act 2010:rent arrears
1. Rent arrears
Equality Act 2010:suitable alternative accommodation
1. Suitable alternative accommodation
errors :domestic violence, risk of
1. R v Islington LBC ex p Adigun
errors :homelessness
1. R v Islington LBC ex p Adigun
2. Porteous v West Dorset DC
errors :licence/tenancy distinction
1. Nutt v Read
errors :local connection and referral
1. R v Islington LBC ex p Adigun
errors :medical evidence
1. Allison v Wandsworth LBC
errors :notice seeking possession
1. Dudley MBC v Bailey
errors :rent books sent in error
1. Westminster CC v Basson
errors :service charges and long leases
1. Universities Superannuation Scheme Ltd v Marks & Spencer plc
errors :warrants for possession, setting aside
1. Tower Hamlets LBC v Azad
estoppel:disrepair
1. Onwuama v Ealing LBC
estoppel:farm workers need no longer pay rent, agreements that
1. Foster v Robinson
estoppel:mortgage possession proceedings
1. Emery v UCB Bank plc
estoppel:promissory estoppel
1. Emery v UCB Bank plc
estoppel:rent regulation
1. Contour Homes Ltd v Rowen
estoppel:repairing covenants
1. Brikom Investments Ltd v Seaford
estoppel:res judicata
1. Onwuama v Ealing LBC
estoppel:succession, assurances of
1. Daejan Properties Ltd v Mahoney
estoppel:surrender
1. Foster v Robinson
EU nationals :children
1. Harrow LBC v Ibrahim
2. Teixeira v Lambeth LBC
EU nationals :dependents
1. Zambrano v Office National de l’Emploi
EU nationals :effective remedy, right to an
1. Panteleeva v Ukraine
EU nationals :homelessness
1. Eligibility
2. Harrow LBC v Ibrahim
3. Teixeira v Lambeth LBC
4. Zambrano v Office National de l’Emploi
EU nationals :homelessness:dependents
1. Zambrano v Office National de l’Emploi
EU nationals :homelessness:immigration control, persons subject to
1. Lekpo-Bozua v Hackney LBC
EU nationals :homelessness:parents
1. Harrow LBC v Ibrahim
2. Teixeira v Lambeth LBC
EU nationals :homelessness:right to reside
1. Harrow LBC v Ibrahim
2. Lekpo-Bozua v Hackney LBC
EU nationals :homelessness:school age, children of
1. Harrow LBC v Ibrahim
2. Teixeira v Lambeth LBC
EU nationals :homelessness:workers, definition of
1. Barry v Southwark LBC
EU nationals :immigration control, persons subject to
1. Lekpo-Bozua v Hackney LBC
EU nationals :life, right to
1. Article 2: Right to life
2. Budayeva v Russia
EU nationals :necessary in a democratic society
1. Stanková v Slovakia
2. Manchester CC v Pinnock
EU nationals :parents
1. Harrow LBC v Ibrahim
2. Teixeira v Lambeth LBC
EU nationals :positive obligations
1. Budayeva v Russia
EU nationals :right to reside
1. Harrow LBC v Ibrahim
2. Lekpo-Bozua v Hackney LBC
EU nationals :school age, children of
1. Harrow LBC v Ibrahim
2. Teixeira v Lambeth LBC
EU nationals :workers, definition of
1. Barry v Southwark LBC
eviction:conflicts of interest
1. Belchikova v Russia
eviction:delay
1. Mirzayev v Azerbaijan
2. Panteleeva v Ukraine
eviction:explanations, provision of
1. Orlić v Croatia
eviction:fair hearing, right to a
1. Mirzayev v Azerbaijan
2. Palumbo v Italy
3. Panteleeva v Ukraine
eviction:internally displaced persons, delay in eviction of
1. Mirzayev v Azerbaijan
eviction:judicial review
1. Administrative law and human rights defences
eviction:private and family life and home, right to respect for:conflicts of interest
1. Belchikova v Russia
eviction:private and family life and home, right to respect for:explanations, provision of
1. Orlić v Croatia
evidence:acoustic evidence
1. Lewisham LBC v Hall
evidence:acquiescence, intentional homelessness and
1. R v Eastleigh BC ex p Beattie (No 2)
2. R v West Dorset DC ex p Phillips
evidence:alternative accommodation, attempts to find
1. Alexander v Mohamadzadeh
evidence:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under
1. Lewisham LBC v Hall
evidence:experts
1. Onwuama v Ealing LBC
2. Southwark LBC v Simpson
3. Housing Act 1988 ss27 and 28
4. Asghar v Ahmed
5. G v Haringey LBC
evidence:fresh evidence
1. Lee-Steere v Jennings
2. Leeds and Yorkshire Housing Association v Vertigan
evidence:medical evidence
1. Allison v Wandsworth LBC
2. Hijazi v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
evidence:mortgage possession proceedings
1. Halifax plc v Alexander
2. Cheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Grant
evidence:notice to quit
1. Wirral MBC v Smith
evidence:nuisance and annoyance
1. Anti-social behaviour (Housing Acts 1985 and 1988)
2. Croydon LBC v Moody
3. Leeds and Yorkshire Housing Association v Vertigan
evidence:overcrowding
1. Henry Smith’s Charity Trustees v Bartosiak-Jentys
evidence:possession orders, setting aside
1. Lewisham LBC v Gurbuz
evidence:possession proceedings, adjournment of
1. Brent LBC v Aniedobe
2. Spitaliotis v Morgan
evidence:psychiatric evidence
1. Croydon LBC v Moody
2. Noh v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
evidence:rent arrears
1. Lee-Steere v Jennings
evidence:succession
1. Marsh v Lewisham LBC
exceptional circumstances:children, priority need and
1. Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBC
2. Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBC
3. Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBC
exceptional circumstances:false statements
1. Shrewsbury and Atcham BC v Evans
exceptional circumstances:forfeiture
1. Southern Depot Co Ltd v British Railways Board
exceptional circumstances:homelessness
1. Shrewsbury and Atcham BC v Evans
2. Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBC
3. Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBC
4. Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBC
exceptional circumstances:licence/tenancy distinction
1. Sharp v McArthur
exceptional circumstances:notice seeking possession
1. Braintree DC v Vincent
2. Camden LBC v Oppong
exceptional circumstances:nuisance and annoyance
1. Bristol CC v Mousah
2. Knowsley Housing Trust v McMullen
exceptional circumstances:out of area placements
1. R (W) v Sheffield CC
exceptional circumstances:owner-occupiers, returning
1. Boyle v Verrall
exceptional circumstances:presumption of tenancy, rebuttal of
1. Sharp v McArthur
exceptional circumstances:priority need
1. Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBC
2. Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBC
3. Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBC
exceptional circumstances:suitability of accommodation
1. R (W) v Sheffield CC
exceptional circumstances:suspension of possession orders
1. Knowsley Housing Trust v McMullen
exceptional circumstances:very serious breaches
1. Bristol CC v Mousah
exceptional circumstances:warrants, notice of seeking
1. Knowsley Housing Trust v McMullen
exclusive possession:character of landlord, irrelevance of
1. Bruton v London and Quadrant Housing Trust
exclusive possession:cockroach infestation
1. Habinteg Housing Association v James
2. Sharpe v Manchester MDC
exclusive possession:costs
1. Creation of tenancies
exclusive possession:dampness
1. Onwuama v Ealing LBC
exclusive possession:disrepair
1. Onwuama v Ealing LBC
2. Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd
exclusive possession:employees, licences for
1. Licences – occupation granted to employees
exclusive possession:hostels
1. Westminster CC v Clarke
exclusive possession:hotels
1. Brillouet v Landless
exclusive possession:individual rooms
1. AG Securities v Vaughan
exclusive possession:keys
1. Aslan v Murphy (No 1)
exclusive possession:licences:employees
1. Licences – occupation granted to employees
exclusive possession:licences:licence/tenancy distinction
1. Bruton v London and Quadrant Housing Trust
2. Aslan v Murphy (No 1)
3. Brillouet v Landless
4. Skipton Building Society v Clayton
5. Nunn v Dalrymple
6. AG Securities v Vaughan
exclusive possession:licences:separate dwelling, let as a
1. Mansfield DC v Langridge
exclusive possession:non-exclusive occupation agreements
1. The distinction between tenancies and licences – ‘non-exclusive occupation agreements’
2. AG Securities v Vaughan
3. Antoniades v Villiers and Bridger
exclusive possession:reality of exclusive possession
1. Skipton Building Society v Clayton
exclusive possession:rent
1. Nunn v Dalrymple
2. Mansfield DC v Langridge
exclusive possession:rooms
1. AG Securities v Vaughan
exclusive possession:separate dwelling, let as a
1. Westminster CC v Clarke
2. Mansfield DC v Langridge
exclusive possession:title of landlord, lack of
1. Bruton v London and Quadrant Housing Trust
exclusive possession:trespassers
1. Civil proceedings
exclusive possession:weekly rent, payment of
1. Nunn v Dalrymple
exemplary damages
1. Festusi Porbeni v Abdellaziz Chaabdiss
exemplary damages:agents
1. Ramdath v Daley
exemplary damages:all elements of compensation, covering
1. Branchett v Beaney
exemplary damages:assault
1. Naveed v Raja
exemplary damages:conduct of tenants, relevance of
1. McMillan v Singh
exemplary damages:disrepair
1. Festusi Porbeni v Abdellaziz Chaabdiss
exemplary damages:fines in criminal courts, in addition to
1. Asghar v Ahmed
exemplary damages:harassment and illegal eviction
1. Asghar v Ahmed
2. Branchett v Beaney
3. Drane v Evangelou
exemplary damages:harassment and illegal eviction:agents
1. Ramdath v Daley
exemplary damages:harassment and illegal eviction:all elements of compensation, covering
1. Branchett v Beaney
exemplary damages:harassment and illegal eviction:assault
1. Naveed v Raja
exemplary damages:harassment and illegal eviction:conduct of tenants, relevance of
1. McMillan v Singh
exemplary damages:harassment and illegal eviction:disrepair
1. Festusi Porbeni v Abdellaziz Chaabdiss
exemplary damages:harassment and illegal eviction:fines in criminal courts, in addition to
1. Asghar v Ahmed
exemplary damages:harassment and illegal eviction:higher rent obtained by landlord after eviction
1. Keddey v Hughes
exemplary damages:harassment and illegal eviction:motives of landlord, establishing
1. Mafo v Adams
exemplary damages:harassment and illegal eviction:vacant possession, eviction for sale with
1. Islam v Yap
exemplary damages:harassment and illegal eviction:warnings to landlords
1. Keddey v Hughes
exemplary damages:higher rent obtained by landlord after eviction
1. Keddey v Hughes
exemplary damages:motives of landlord, establishing
1. Mafo v Adams
exemplary damages:vacant possession, eviction for sale with
1. Islam v Yap
exemplary damages:warnings to landlords
1. Keddey v Hughes
experts
1. Onwuama v Ealing LBC
2. Southwark LBC v Simpson
3. Housing Act 1988 ss27 and 28
4. Asghar v Ahmed
5. G v Haringey LBC
expropriation:Communist regime, restoration of property confiscated during
1. Velikovi v Bulgaria
expropriation:compensation
1. Velikovi v Bulgaria
expropriation:good faith, acquisition in
1. Velikovi v Bulgaria
expropriation:proportionality
1. Velikovi v Bulgaria
expropriation:public health and environmental protection
1. Local authority enforcement
expropriation:public interest
1. Velikovi v Bulgaria
exterior
1. Douglas-Scott v Scorgie
2. Hopwood v Cannock Chase DC (formerly Rugeley UDC)
3. Quick v Taff-Ely BC
4. Ball and Ball v Plymouth CC
5. Southwark LBC v McIntosh
6. Barrett v Lounova (1982) Ltd
extortionate credit bargains
1. Broadwick Financial Services Ltd v Spencer
2. Paragon Finance Ltd v Nash; Paragon Finance plc v Staunton
3. City Mortgage Corp Ltd v Baptiste
extractor fans
1. Switzer v Law
2. Symons v Warren
face to face meetings, right to
1. Makisi v Birmingham CC; Yosief v Birmingham CC; Nagi v Birmingham CC
fact-finding role, judges usurping council’s
1. Kruja v Enfield LBC
failure of landlord to take action against other occupants:anti-social behaviour of neighbours
1. Mitchell v Glasgow CC
2. Hussain v Lancaster CC
failure of landlord to take action against other occupants:criminal acts of others, no duty of care of landlords to prevent
1. X and Y v Hounslow LBC
failure of landlord to take action against other occupants:duty of care of landlords
1. Mitchell v Glasgow CC
2. X and Y v Hounslow LBC
failure of landlord to take action against other occupants:harassment and illegal eviction
1. Landlord’s failure to take action against other occupants
2. Mitchell v Glasgow CC
3. Hussain v Lancaster CC
4. Lippiatt v South Gloucestershire Council
5. Mowan v Wandsworth LBC
6. O’Leary v Islington LBC
7. X and Y v Hounslow LBC
failure of landlord to take action against other occupants:implied terms to enforce terms of another tenancy, no
1. O’Leary v Islington LBC
failure of landlord to take action against other occupants:licensees, nuisance by
1. Lippiatt v South Gloucestershire Council
failure of landlord to take action against other occupants:murder by neighbours
1. Mitchell v Glasgow CC
failure of landlord to take action against other occupants:neighbours
1. Landlord’s failure to take action against other occupants
2. Mitchell v Glasgow CC
3. Hussain v Lancaster CC
failure of landlord to take action against other occupants:nuisance by tenants, council’s liability for
1. Mowan v Wandsworth LBC
failure of landlord to take action against other occupants:ombudsmen
1. Landlord’s failure to take action against other occupants
failure to evict; breach, Article 1 Protocol 1
1. Scollo v Italy
fair hearing, right to a
1. Article 6: Right to a fair trial
2. Ali v UK
3. Anderson v UK
4. Kletsova v Russia
5. Mirzayev v Azerbaijan
6. Palumbo v Italy
7. Panteleeva v Ukraine
8. Tsfayo v UK
9. Vyrovyy v Ukraine
10. Waltoś and Pawlicz v Poland
fair hearing, right to a:administrative acts without hearings, issue of warrants as
1. Southwark LBC v St Brice
fair hearing, right to a:appeals
1. Begum (Runa) v Tower Hamlets LBC
2. Tomlinson v Birmingham CC (Ali v Birmingham CC)
fair hearing, right to a:asserting right to accommodation, delay in
1. Vyrovyy v Ukraine
fair hearing, right to a:delay
1. Anderson v UK
2. Tsfayo v UK
3. Vyrovyy v Ukraine
4. Waltoś and Pawlicz v Poland
fair hearing, right to a:delay:asserting right to accommodation, in
1. Vyrovyy v Ukraine
fair hearing, right to a:delay:complexity
1. Anderson v UK
fair hearing, right to a:delay:enforcement
1. Palumbo v Italy
fair hearing, right to a:delay:eviction
1. Panteleeva v Ukraine
fair hearing, right to a:delay:Housing Benefit Review Board
1. Tsfayo v UK
fair hearing, right to a:delay:length of proceedings
1. Anderson v UK
fair hearing, right to a:delay:possession orders
1. Palumbo v Italy
2. Panteleeva v Ukraine
fair hearing, right to a:delay:reasons
1. Tsfayo v UK
fair hearing, right to a:effective remedy, right to an
1. Panteleeva v Ukraine
fair hearing, right to a:enforcement of judgments and orders
1. Kletsova v Russia
2. Palumbo v Italy
3. Panteleeva v Ukraine
fair hearing, right to a:eviction
1. Mirzayev v Azerbaijan
2. Palumbo v Italy
3. Panteleeva v Ukraine
fair hearing, right to a:Gypsies and Travellers
1. R (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset Police
fair hearing, right to a:homelessness
1. Begum (Runa) v Tower Hamlets LBC
fair hearing, right to a:Housing Benefit Review Board
1. Tsfayo v UK
fair hearing, right to a:independence
1. Tsfayo v UK
fair hearing, right to a:interim possession orders
1. R (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset Police
fair hearing, right to a:internally displaced persons, delay in eviction of
1. Mirzayev v Azerbaijan
fair hearing, right to a:judicial review
1. Tsfayo v UK
2. Begum (Runa) v Tower Hamlets LBC
fair hearing, right to a:length of proceedings
1. Anderson v UK
fair hearing, right to a:occupancy vouchers as possessions
1. Mirzayev v Azerbaijan
fair hearing, right to a:omissions
1. Tsfayo v UK
fair hearing, right to a:peaceful enjoyment of possessions
1. Mirzayev v Azerbaijan
fair hearing, right to a:possession orders
1. Palumbo v Italy
2. Panteleeva v Ukraine
3. R (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset Police
4. Southwark LBC v St Brice
fair hearing, right to a:reasons for delay
1. Tsfayo v UK
fair hearing, right to a:state, necessity for proceedings against
1. Kletsova v Russia
fair rent, registration of
1. Sturolson and Co v Mauroux
falls from patios
1. Smith v Bradford MDC
false statements, tenancies obtained by:assignment
1. Islington LBC v Uckac
false statements, tenancies obtained by:assured tenancies
1. Tenancy obtained by false statement
false statements, tenancies obtained by:burden of proof akin to criminal standard
1. Waltham Forest LBC v Roberts
false statements, tenancies obtained by:exceptional circumstances, consideration of homelessness in
1. Shrewsbury and Atcham BC v Evans
false statements, tenancies obtained by:fraud
1. Southwark LBC v Erekin
false statements, tenancies obtained by:grounds for possession
1. Tenancy obtained by false statement
2. Islington LBC v Uckac
3. Merton LBC v Richards
4. Waltham Forest LBC v Roberts
5. Tenancy obtained by false statement
6. Lewisham LBC v Adeyemi/Lewisham LBC v Akinsola
7. North Herts DC v Carthy
8. Rushcliffe BC v Watson
9. Shrewsbury and Atcham BC v Evans
10. Southwark LBC v Erekin
false statements, tenancies obtained by:homelessness
1. Lewisham LBC v Adeyemi/Lewisham LBC v Akinsola
2. Rushcliffe BC v Watson
3. Shrewsbury and Atcham BC v Evans
false statements, tenancies obtained by:misrepresentors, assignment by
1. Islington LBC v Uckac
false statements, tenancies obtained by:parents had not acted on tenants’ instigation, where
1. Merton LBC v Richards
false statements, tenancies obtained by:possession orders, reasonableness of
1. Tenancy obtained by false statement
2. Lewisham LBC v Adeyemi/Lewisham LBC v Akinsola
3. North Herts DC v Carthy
4. Rushcliffe BC v Watson
5. Shrewsbury and Atcham BC v Evans
6. Southwark LBC v Erekin
false statements, tenancies obtained by:refusal of possession
1. Southwark LBC v Erekin
false statements, tenancies obtained by:secure tenancies
1. Tenancy obtained by false statement
2. Lewisham LBC v Adeyemi/Lewisham LBC v Akinsola
3. North Herts DC v Carthy
4. Rushcliffe BC v Watson
false statements, tenancies obtained by:seriousness of allegations
1. Waltham Forest LBC v Roberts
families:availability of accommodation
1. R v Lambeth LBC ex p Ly
families:elsewhere, tenants living with
1. Regalian Securities Ltd v Scheuer
families:family court orders
1. Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBC
2. Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBC
3. Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBC
families:homelessness
1. Ozbek v Ipswich BC
2. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Avdic
3. R v Camden LBC ex p Hersi
4. Suitability and out of area placements
families:intention
1. Errington v Errington and Woods
families:licence/tenancy distinction
1. Errington v Errington and Woods
2. Marcroft Wagons Ltd v Smith
3. Meynell Family Properties Ltd v Meynell
4. Nunn v Dalrymple
5. Ward v Warnke
families:local connection and referral
1. Ozbek v Ipswich BC
2. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Avdic
families:member of another’s family, definition of
1. Succession to secure tenancies
families:member of family, definition of
1. Brent LBC v Fofana
2. Michalak v Wandsworth LBC
families:proximity of accommodation to family
1. Suitability and out of area placements
2. R (Yumsak) v Enfield LBC
families:reasonably expected to reside with applicants, persons who may
1. R v Lambeth LBC ex p Ly
families:rent, payment of
1. Nunn v Dalrymple
2. Ward v Warnke
families:same sex partners
1. Fitzpatrick v Sterling Housing Association
families:staying on of deceased persons’ children
1. Marcroft Wagons Ltd v Smith
families:strangers, close relationships between
1. Carega Properties SA v Sharratt
families:strong family flavour to arrangements, where there is
1. Meynell Family Properties Ltd v Meynell
families:succession
1. Michalak v Wandsworth LBC
2. Carega Properties SA v Sharratt
3. Fitzpatrick v Sterling Housing Association
4. Brock v Wollams
5. Sefton Holdings Ltd v Cairns
families:suitability of accommodation
1. R (Yumsak) v Enfield LBC
financial circumstances:abroad, accommodation situated
1. R v Camden LBC ex p Aranda
financial circumstances:homelessness
1. R v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p Bayani
financial circumstances:mortgage possession proceedings
1. Polonski v Lloyds Bank Mortgages Ltd
financial circumstances:suitable alternative accommodation
1. Amrit Holdings Co Ltd v Shahbakhti
fines:abatement notices
1. Canterbury CC v Ferris
fines:aggravated damages
1. Asghar v Ahmed
fines:daily rate
1. Canterbury CC v Ferris
2. Queeney v Wolverhampton BC
fines:dangerous appliances
1. Health and Safety Executive v Hussain
fines:discretion
1. Canterbury CC v Ferris
fines:disrepair
1. Connell v Hackney LBC
2. Mullen v Hackney LBC
fines:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under
1. Canterbury CC v Ferris
2. Health and Safety Executive v Hussain
3. Queeney v Wolverhampton BC
fines:exemplary damages
1. Asghar v Ahmed
fines:failure to carry out works
1. Queeney v Wolverhampton BC
fines:gas safety certificates, not having
1. Health and Safety Executive v Hussain
fire:homelessness and priority need
1. Noble v South Herefordshire DC
fire:safety, inadequacy of
1. R v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p Ben-El-Mabrouk
fitness for human habitation
1. McMinn Bole and Van Den Haak v Huntsbuild Ltd and Richard Money (t/a Richard Money Associates)
fitness of premises, implied warranties as to
1. Southwark LBC v Mills; Southwark LBC v Tanner; Baxter v Camden LBC
fixed-term tenancies, forfeiture of
1. Forfeiture
flooding:building works
1. Lambert v Barratt Homes Ltd and Rochdale MBC
flooding:burst pipes
1. Passley v Wandsworth LBC
flooding:damages
1. Lambeth LBC v Martin
flooding:disrepair
1. Passley v Wandsworth LBC
2. Lambert v Barratt Homes Ltd and Rochdale MBC
3. Lambeth LBC v Martin
flooding:homelessness and priority need
1. Noble v South Herefordshire DC
floors: joists
1. Fincar SRL v 109/113 Mount Street Management Co Ltd
floors:uneven floors
1. Windever v Liverpool CC
foreseeability
1. Lavimizadeh v Lambeth LBC
2. Mira v Aylmer Square Investments Ltd
forfeiture
1. Forfeiture
2. Billson v Residential Apartments Ltd
3. Adagio Properties v Ansari
4. British Petroleum Pension Trust v Behrendt
5. Central Estates (Belgravia) Ltd v Woolgar (No 2)
6. Chrisdell Ltd v Johnson and Tickner
7. Cooper v Henderson
8. Cornillie v Saha and Bradford and Bingley Building Society
9. Courtney Lodge Management Ltd v Blake
10. Croydon (Unique) Ltd v Wright
11. Eaton Square Properties Ltd v Beveridge
12. Escalus Properties Ltd v Robinson
13. Hynes v Twinsectra Ltd
14. Khar v Delbounty Ltd
15. Maryland Estates v Bar-Joseph
16. Patel v K & J Restaurants Ltd
17. Reichman v Beveridge
18. Savva v Houssein
19. Sinclair Gardens Investments (Kensington) v Walsh
20. Smith v Spaul
21. Swordheath Properties Ltd v Bolt
22. Thomas v Ken Thomas Ltd
23. Ashton v Sobelman
24. Billson v Residential Apartments Ltd (No 2)
25. Church Commissioners for England v Nodjoumi
26. Rendham Holdings Ltd v Patel
27. Southern Depot Co Ltd v British Railways Board
28. Van Haarlam v Kasner Charitable Trust
forfeiture:acceptance of rent, breach waived by
1. Central Estates (Belgravia) Ltd v Woolgar (No 2)
forfeiture:assignment
1. Church Commissioners for England v Nodjoumi
forfeiture:breach, persons bound to remedy
1. Smith v Spaul
forfeiture:breach of covenant regarding user waived only for past breaches
1. Cooper v Henderson
forfeiture:charging orders to be given notice of possession proceedings, creditors with
1. Croydon (Unique) Ltd v Wright
forfeiture:continuing liability, rent arrears including
1. Maryland Estates v Bar-Joseph
forfeiture:date:first hearings, date fixed for
1. Swordheath Properties Ltd v Bolt
forfeiture:date:relief should be granted, from which
1. Sinclair Gardens Investments (Kensington) v Walsh
forfeiture:date:return day, meaning of
1. Swordheath Properties Ltd v Bolt
forfeiture:defect, particulars of each
1. Adagio Properties v Ansari
forfeiture:definition
1. Forfeiture
forfeiture:demands for rent not waiving right to forfeit
1. Van Haarlam v Kasner Charitable Trust
forfeiture:dismissed, no need to apply for relief where forfeiture proceedings
1. Hynes v Twinsectra Ltd
forfeiture:exceptional circumstances
1. Southern Depot Co Ltd v British Railways Board
forfeiture:facts, relief granted on the
1. Central Estates (Belgravia) Ltd v Woolgar (No 2)
forfeiture:first hearings, date fixed for
1. Swordheath Properties Ltd v Bolt
forfeiture:fixed-term tenancies, termination of
1. Forfeiture
forfeiture:mitigation by landlords
1. Reichman v Beveridge
forfeiture:mortgagees, relief available to
1. Escalus Properties Ltd v Robinson
forfeiture:negative covenants as being capable of remedy, breach of
1. Savva v Houssein
forfeiture:notice to creditors of possession proceedings
1. Croydon (Unique) Ltd v Wright
forfeiture:nuisance
1. Courtney Lodge Management Ltd v Blake
forfeiture:oppression
1. Rendham Holdings Ltd v Patel
forfeiture:past breaches, breach only waived for
1. Cooper v Henderson
forfeiture:planning enforcement notices, service of
1. Billson v Residential Apartments Ltd (No 2)
forfeiture:possession proceedings, adjournment of
1. R v A Circuit Judge (sitting at Norwich County Court) ex p Wathen
forfeiture:prostitution, where premises used for
1. British Petroleum Pension Trust v Behrendt
forfeiture:Protection from Eviction Act 1977, occupant not protected by
1. Eaton Square Properties Ltd v Beveridge
forfeiture:re-entry, forfeiture by
1. Billson v Residential Apartments Ltd
forfeiture:relief
1. Billson v Residential Apartments Ltd
2. British Petroleum Pension Trust v Behrendt
3. Central Estates (Belgravia) Ltd v Woolgar (No 2)
4. Escalus Properties Ltd v Robinson
5. Hynes v Twinsectra Ltd
6. Khar v Delbounty Ltd
7. Maryland Estates v Bar-Joseph
8. Patel v K & J Restaurants Ltd
9. Sinclair Gardens Investments (Kensington) v Walsh
10. Billson v Residential Apartments Ltd (No 2)
11. Southern Depot Co Ltd v British Railways Board
forfeiture:rent arrears
1. Artesian Residential Investments Ltd v Beck
2. R v A Circuit Judge (sitting at Norwich County Court) ex p Wathen
forfeiture:rent arrears:‘all the rent in arrears’, definition of
1. Maryland Estates v Bar-Joseph
forfeiture:rent arrears:assignment, section 146 notice on
1. Church Commissioners for England v Nodjoumi
forfeiture:rent arrears:continuing liability, including
1. Maryland Estates v Bar-Joseph
forfeiture:rent arrears:demands for rent not waiving right to forfeit
1. Van Haarlam v Kasner Charitable Trust
forfeiture:rent arrears:return rent, waiver where landlord does not
1. Thomas v Ken Thomas Ltd
forfeiture:rent arrears:section 146 notices, right to forfeit not waived by
1. Church Commissioners for England v Nodjoumi
forfeiture:rent arrears:waiver of breach, payment operating as
1. Thomas v Ken Thomas Ltd
forfeiture:return day, meaning of
1. Swordheath Properties Ltd v Bolt
forfeiture:return rent, waiver where landlord does not
1. Thomas v Ken Thomas Ltd
forfeiture:section 146 notices
1. Adagio Properties v Ansari
2. Smith v Spaul
3. Church Commissioners for England v Nodjoumi
forfeiture:service
1. Smith v Spaul
forfeiture:stay of execution, failure of court to consider
1. Rendham Holdings Ltd v Patel
forfeiture:subtenants
1. Keepers and Governors of the Free Grammar School of John Lyon v James
2. Cornillie v Saha and Bradford and Bingley Building Society
3. Ashton v Sobelman
forfeiture:time for responding to breach
1. Courtney Lodge Management Ltd v Blake
forfeiture:vacant possession out of proportion to breaches, where
1. Patel v K & J Restaurants Ltd
forfeiture:variation of terms of relief
1. Khar v Delbounty Ltd
forfeiture:waiver of breach
1. Central Estates (Belgravia) Ltd v Woolgar (No 2)
2. Cooper v Henderson
3. Cornillie v Saha and Bradford and Bingley Building Society
4. Thomas v Ken Thomas Ltd
5. Church Commissioners for England v Nodjoumi
6. Van Haarlam v Kasner Charitable Trust
former employees
1. Former employees
2. Duncan v Hay
former employees:assured tenancies
1. Former employees
former employees:capacity, employment in a different
1. Duncan v Hay
former employees:discretionary grounds
1. Former employees
former employees:grounds for possession
1. Former employees
2. Duncan v Hay
former employees:Rent Act tenancies
1. Former employees
former employees:secure tenancies
1. Former employees
former employees:trespassers
1. Whitbread West Pennines Ltd v Reedy
fostering
1. Sheffield CC v Wall
foundations, stability of
1. McMinn Bole and Van Den Haak v Huntsbuild Ltd and Richard Money (t/a Richard Money Associates)
fraud:assignment, consent to
1. Sanctuary Housing Association v Baker
fraud:false statements
1. Southwark LBC v Erekin
fraud:holiday lets
1. Killick v Roberts
fraud:homelessness
1. R v Barnet LBC ex p Rughooputh
2. R v Dacorum DC ex p Walsh
3. R v Southwark LBC ex p Dagou
4. R v Lambeth LBC ex p Wilson
fraud:intentional homelessness
1. R v Barnet LBC ex p Rughooputh
fraud:mortgages
1. R v Barnet LBC ex p Rughooputh
fraud:possession orders, setting aside
1. Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Hill
fraud:rescission
1. Killick v Roberts
fraud:warrants for possession, setting aside
1. Setting aside warrants after execution
2. Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Hill
fraud:wasted costs orders
1. R v Lambeth LBC ex p Wilson
freedom of expression:Article 10
1. Mustafa and Tarzibachi v Sweden
frozen pipes
1. Stockley v Knowsley MBC
fully mutual co-operative tenancies
1. Ali Bhai and Cabare v Black Roof CHA Ltd
gang-related violence
1. Murray v Chief Constable of Lancashire
gardens:deterioration of garden until becoming a tenant, successors not liable for
1. Holloway v Povey
gardens:grounds for possession
1. Enfield LBC v French
2. Holloway v Povey
gardens:steps, defects in
1. McAuley v Bristol CC
gardens:weight given to needs of tenants
1. Enfield LBC v French
gas and electricity :harassment and illegal eviction
1. Housing Act 1988 ss27 and 28
gas and electricity :high or low rent, tenancies at a
1. Bostock v Bryant and Another
gas and electricity :implied covenants to supply
1. McCall v Abelesz
gas and electricity :Protection from Eviction Act 1977
1. McCall v Abelesz
gas and electricity :withdrawal of services
1. Housing Act 1988 ss27 and 28
gas safety certificates
1. Health and Safety Executive v Hussain
gatekeeping approach
1. Gate-keeping
2. Edwards and others v Birmingham City Council
3. R (Anonymous) v Southwark LBC
4. R (Kelly) v Birmingham CC
5. R (Khazai) v Birmingham CC
6. R (Raw) v Lambeth LBC
general housing circumstances in area, assessment of
1. R v Brent LBC ex p Bariise
2. R v Newham LBC ex p Tower Hamlets LBC
good condition, covenants to keep premises in
1. Welsh v Greenwich LBC
2. Lee v Leeds CC
good faith
1. Velikovi v Bulgaria
2. Lewisham LBC v Gurbuz
3. Deliberate act or omission
4. Aw-Aden v Birmingham CC
5. F v Birmingham CC
6. Gibbons v Bury MBC
7. Hobbs v Sutton LBC
8. O’Connor v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
9. R v Barnet LBC ex p Rughooputh
10. R v Exeter CC ex p Tranckle
11. R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Rouf
12. R v Wandsworth LBC ex p Onwudiwe
13. R v Winchester CC ex p Ashton
14. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Lusi and Lusi
15. R v Mole Valley DC ex p Burton
16. R v Wandsworth LBC ex p Rose
17. R v Westminster CC ex p Obeid
government departments
1. R v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food ex p Callaghan
ground rent
1. Statutory regulation of ground rent, service and administration charges
grounds for possession
1. Introduction
grounds for possession:agricultural employees
1. Agricultural employees
2. Fowler v Minchin
3. Springfield Investments Ltd v Bell
grounds for possession:appeals
1. Bracknell Forest BC v Green
grounds for possession:assured shorthold tenancies
1. Introduction
grounds for possession:assured tenancies
1. Introduction
2. Rent arrears
3. Rent arrears (Housing Act 1988 Sch 2 Grounds 8, 10 and 11)
4. Artesian Residential Investments Ltd v Beck
5. Baygreen Properties Ltd v Gil
6. Bessa Plus v Lancaster
7. Capital Prime Plus plc v Wills
8. Day v Coltrane
9. Leadenhall Residential 2 Ltd v Stirling
10. North British Housing Association Limited v Matthews
11. R (Weaver) v London & Quadrant Housing Trust
12. Diab v Countrywide Rentals 1 plc
13. Etherington v Burt
14. Milecastle Housing Ltd v Walton
grounds for possession:breach of obligations
1. Breach of obligation
2. Breach of obligation and anti-social behaviour
3. Barking and Dagenham LBC v Hyatt and Hyatt
grounds for possession:Court of Appeal, role of
1. Bracknell Forest BC v Green
grounds for possession:death of tenants
1. Death of tenant
2. Shepping v Osada
3. Wandsworth LBC v Randall
grounds for possession:degree, weight given to tenant’s needs as a matter of
1. Enfield LBC v French
grounds for possession:demolition or redevelopment, property required for
1. Property required for demolition or redevelopment
2. Wansbeck DC v Marley
3. Sugarwhite v Afridi
grounds for possession:deterioration of garden until becoming a tenant, successors not liable for
1. Holloway v Povey
grounds for possession:domestic violence
1. Camden LBC v Mallett
2. Metropolitan Housing Trust v Hadjazi
grounds for possession:employees, licences for
1. Licences – occupation granted to employees
grounds for possession:false statements
1. Tenancy obtained by false statement
2. Islington LBC v Uckac
3. Merton LBC v Richards
4. Waltham Forest LBC v Roberts
5. Tenancy obtained by false statement
6. Lewisham LBC v Adeyemi/Lewisham LBC v Akinsola
7. North Herts DC v Carthy
8. Rushcliffe BC v Watson
9. Shrewsbury and Atcham BC v Evans
10. Southwark LBC v Erekin
grounds for possession:former employees
1. Former employees
2. Duncan v Hay
grounds for possession:gardens
1. Enfield LBC v French
2. Holloway v Povey
grounds for possession:landlords or members of family, premises required for
1. Premises required for landlord or member of family (Rent Act 1977 Sch 15 Case 9)
2. Alexander v Mohamadzadeh
3. Amaddio v Dalton
4. Baker v MacIver
5. Bassett v Fraser
6. Bostock v Tacher de la Pagerie
7. Coombes v Parry
8. Evans v Engelson
9. Ghelani v Bowie
10. Hodges v Blee
11. Kidder v Birch
12. Manaton v Edwards
13. Mansukhani v Sharkey
grounds for possession:licences
1. Licences – occupation granted to employees
grounds for possession:notice seeking possession
1. Notices seeking possession (Housing Act 1985)
2. Camden LBC v Oppong
3. Dudley MBC v Bailey
4. Torridge DC v Jones
5. Slough BC v Robbins
6. Marath v MacGillivray
7. Mountain v Hastings
grounds for possession:nuisance or annoyance
1. Anti-social behaviour
2. Breach of obligation and anti-social behaviour
3. Accent Peerless Ltd (formerly Surrey Heath Housing Association Ltd) v Kingsdon
4. Barking and Dagenham LBC v Hyatt and Hyatt
5. Bedfordshire Pilgrims Housing Association Ltd v Khan
6. Brent LBC v Doughan
7. Bristol CC v Mousah
8. CDS Housing v Bellis
9. Camden LBC v Gilsenan
10. Canterbury CC v Lowe
11. Castle Vale Housing Action Trust v Gallagher
12. Croydon LBC v Moody
13. Darlington BC v Sterling
14. Greenwich LBC v Grogan
15. Knowsley Housing Trust v McMullen
16. Lambeth LBC v Howard
17. Leeds and Yorkshire Housing Association v Vertigan
18. London and Quadrant Housing Trust v Root
19. Manchester CC v Higgins
20. Matthews v Ahmed
21. New Charter Housing (North) Ltd v Ashcroft
22. Newcastle upon Tyne CC v Morrison
23. North Devon Homes Ltd v Batchelor
24. Norwich CC v Famuyiwa
25. Sheffield CC v Green
26. Sheffield CC v Jepson
27. Sheffield CC v Shaw
28. Solon South West Housing Association Ltd v James
29. Wandsworth LBC v Hargreaves
30. Wandsworth LBC v Webb
31. West Kent Housing Association v Davies
32. Woking BC v Bistram
33. Knowsley Housing Trust v Prescott
34. Sheffield CC v Fletcher
grounds for possession:overcrowding
1. Overcrowding
grounds for possession:owner-occupiers
1. Owner-occupiers
grounds for possession:reasonableness
1. Introduction and general considerations
2. Cumming v Danson
3. Manchester CC v Green
4. Shrimpton v Rabbits
grounds for possession:rehearings or retrials
1. Bracknell Forest BC v Green
grounds for possession:Rent Act tenancies
1. Introduction
2. Rent arrears
3. Bird v Hildage
4. Dellenty v Pellow
5. Shaw v Groom
grounds for possession:rent arrears
1. Marath v MacGillivray
2. Rent arrears
3. Rent arrears
4. Brent LBC v Marks
5. Burgoyne v Griffiths
6. Haringey LBC v Stewart
7. Hayman v Rowlands
8. Laimond Properties Ltd v Raeuchle
9. Lambeth LBC v Henry
10. Lambeth LBC v Thomas
11. Lee-Steere v Jennings
12. Second WRVS Housing Society v Blair
13. Sopwith v Stutchbury
14. Taj v Ali (No 1)
15. Woodspring DC v Taylor
grounds for possession:repairs, possession refused where tenants had allowed access for
1. Empson v Forde
grounds for possession:review of lower court decisions, not restricted to
1. Bracknell Forest BC v Green
grounds for possession:secure tenancies
1. Introduction
2. Rent arrears (Housing Act 1985 Sch 2 Ground 1)
3. Notting Hill Housing Trust v Jones
4. Lewisham LBC v Simba-Tola
grounds for possession:subletting whole of premises
1. Subletting the whole of premises
2. Leith Properties Ltd v Springer
3. Pazgate Ltd v McGrath
4. RC Glaze Properties Ltd v Alabdinboni
grounds for possession:suitable alternative accommodation
1. Suitable alternative accommodation
2. Akram v Adam
3. Amrit Holdings Co Ltd v Shahbakhti
4. Fennbend Ltd v Millar
5. Hill v Rochard
6. Jones v Cook
7. Montross Associated Investments v Stone
8. Mykolyshyn v Noah
9. Redspring v Francis
10. Siddiqui v Rashid
11. Yewbright Properties Ltd v Stone
12. Yoland Ltd v Reddington
13. Rosemary Estates Ltd v Connolly
14. Suitable alternative accommodation
15. Battlespring Ltd v Gates
16. Dawncar Investments Ltd v Plews
17. Lee v Whitehouse
18. Minchburn Estates Ltd v Fernandez
grounds for possession:weight given to tenant’s needs
1. Enfield LBC v French
Gypsies and Travellers:asked to leave, notice invalid where travellers not first
1. R (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset Police
Gypsies and Travellers:bed and breakfast accommodation
1. Codona v Mid-Bedfordshire DC
Gypsies and Travellers:clearance of sites
1. Basildon DC v McCarthy
Gypsies and Travellers:cultural aversion to bricks and mortar
1. Codona v Mid-Bedfordshire DC
2. Lee v Rhondda Cynon Taf CBC
3. R (Maughan) v Leicester CC
4. R (Price) v Carmarthenshire CC
Gypsies and Travellers:directions for removal
1. R v Wealden DC ex p Wales; R v Lincolnshire CC ex p Atkinson
Gypsies and Travellers:eviction
1. R (Casey) v Crawley BC
Gypsies and Travellers:fair hearing, right to a
1. R (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset Police
Gypsies and Travellers:formalities, not merits, consideration of
1. R v Wolverhampton MBC ex p Dunne
Gypsies and Travellers:government departments not under obligations owed by councils
1. R v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food ex p Callaghan
Gypsies and Travellers:homelessness
1. Basildon DC v McCarthy
2. Codona v Mid-Bedfordshire DC
3. Lee v Rhondda Cynon Taf CBC
4. R (Maughan) v Leicester CC
5. R (Price) v Carmarthenshire CC
Gypsies and Travellers:humanitarian and statutory considerations
1. R v Wealden DC ex p Wales; R v Lincolnshire CC ex p Atkinson
Gypsies and Travellers:inhuman or degrading treatment
1. R (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset Police
Gypsies and Travellers:interim possession orders
1. R v Wealden DC ex p Wales; R v Lincolnshire CC ex p Atkinson
2. R v Wolverhampton MBC ex p Dunne
3. R (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset Police
4. Shropshire CC v Wynne
5. Ward v Hillingdon LBC
Gypsies and Travellers:personal circumstances after making orders, enquiries into
1. R v Wolverhampton MBC ex p Dunne
Gypsies and Travellers:private and family life and home, right to respect for:fair hearing, right to a
1. R (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset Police
Gypsies and Travellers:private and family life and home, right to respect for:homelessness
1. R (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset Police
2. Ward v Hillingdon LBC
3. Codona v Mid-Bedfordshire DC
4. R (Maughan) v Leicester CC
5. R (Price) v Carmarthenshire CC
Gypsies and Travellers:relevant matters, consideration of all
1. R (Casey) v Crawley BC
Gypsies and Travellers:review decisions, no discretion to
1. Shropshire CC v Wynne
Gypsies and Travellers:suitability
1. Codona v Mid-Bedfordshire DC
2. Lee v Rhondda Cynon Taf CBC
3. R (Maughan) v Leicester CC
4. R (Price) v Carmarthenshire CC
Gypsies and Travellers:trespassers
1. R v Leeds CC ex p Maloney
2. R (Casey) v Crawley BC
Gypsies and Travellers :trespassers
1. R v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food ex p Callaghan
habitual residence
1. R (Antoine) v Reigate and Banstead DC and First Secretary of State
hallmarks of tenancies, presence of
1. Kirby v Lynch
harassment: State failure to protect from;
1. Smirnova v Ukraine
harassment:availability of accommodation
1. R v Westminster CC ex p Bishop
harassment:disrepair, damages for
1. Festusi Porbeni v Abdellaziz Chaabdiss
harassment:motive or intention
1. Kensington Housing Trust v Borkwood
harassment:nuisance and annoyance
1. Kensington Housing Trust v Borkwood
2. Knowsley Housing Trust v McMullen
3. Sheffield CC v Shaw
harassment:past obsessions with neighbours
1. Knowsley Housing Trust v McMullen
harassment:serious harassment of young girls
1. Sheffield CC v Shaw
harassment:subjective test
1. Kensington Housing Trust v Borkwood
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:adequacy of damages
1. Injunctions against landlords
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:agents
1. Ramdath v Daley
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:aggravated damages
1. Festusi Porbeni v Abdellaziz Chaabdiss
2. Asghar v Ahmed
3. Naveed v Raja
4. Rubio-Manzano v Ace Lettings and Pedonomou
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:assault
1. Naveed v Raja
2. Rubio-Manzano v Ace Lettings and Pedonomou
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:assessment
1. Housing Act 1988 ss27 and 28
2. Islam v Yap
3. Aricioglu v Kaan
4. Fakhari v Newman
5. Grillo v Cant and Bassairi Ltd
6. Hunt v Hussain
7. Keddey v Hughes
8. Khan v Iqbal
9. Naveed v Raja
10. Neil v Kingsnorth
11. Odera v Iqbal
12. Ogle v Bundhoo
13. Rubio-Manzano v Ace Lettings and Pedonomou
14. Schuchard v Fu
15. Walsh v Shuangyan
16. White v Lambeth LBC
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:assured shorthold tenants
1. Melville v Bruton
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:assured tenants
1. Cashmere v Walsh, Downing and Veale
2. Grillo v Cant and Bassairi Ltd
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:bed and breakfast accommodation, spending time in
1. Ogle v Bundhoo
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:building works resulting in tenants being unable to remain
1. Abbas v Iqbal
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:caused departure, where it is doubtful that landlord had
1. Murray v Aslam
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:common law
1. Asghar v Ahmed
2. Branchett v Beaney
3. Drane v Evangelou
4. Lord and Haslewood-Ogram v Jessop
5. Mafo v Adams
6. McMillan v Singh
7. Ramdath v Daley
8. Islam v Yap
9. Mehta v Royal Bank of Scotland
10. Murray v Lloyd
11. Abbas v Iqbal
12. Anslow v Hayes
13. Arabhalvaei v Rezaeipoor
14. Aricioglu v Kaan
15. Cashmere v Walsh, Downing and Veale
16. Fakhari v Newman
17. Grillo v Cant and Bassairi Ltd
18. Hunt v Hussain
19. Keddey v Hughes
20. Khan v Iqbal
21. Naveed v Raja
22. Neil v Kingsnorth
23. Odera v Iqbal
24. Ogle v Bundhoo
25. Rubio-Manzano v Ace Lettings and Pedonomou
26. Schuchard v Fu
27. Walsh v Shuangyan
28. White v Lambeth LBC
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:conduct of tenant:eviction, as not being cause of
1. Cashmere v Walsh, Downing and Veale
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:conduct of tenant:exemplary damages
1. McMillan v Singh
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:conduct of tenant:reduction in damages
1. Regalgrand Ltd v Dickerson
2. Cashmere v Walsh, Downing and Veale
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:daily rate
1. Islam v Yap
2. Aricioglu v Kaan
3. Hunt v Hussain
4. Khan v Iqbal
5. Ogle v Bundhoo
6. Schuchard v Fu
7. Walsh v Shuangyan
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:disrepair and harassment
1. Arabhalvaei v Rezaeipoor
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:domestic violence:co-tenants, against
1. Wandsworth LBC v Osei-Bonsu
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:domestic violence:damages, mitigation of
1. Wandsworth LBC v Osei-Bonsu
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:exemplary damages
1. Drane v Evangelou
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:exemplary damages:agents
1. Ramdath v Daley
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:exemplary damages:all elements of compensation, covering
1. Branchett v Beaney
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:exemplary damages:assault
1. Naveed v Raja
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:exemplary damages:conduct of tenants, relevance of
1. McMillan v Singh
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:exemplary damages:fines in criminal courts, in addition to
1. Asghar v Ahmed
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:exemplary damages:higher rent obtained by landlord after eviction
1. Keddey v Hughes
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:exemplary damages:motives of landlord, establishing
1. Mafo v Adams
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:exemplary damages:vacant possession, eviction for sale with
1. Islam v Yap
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:exemplary damages:warnings to landlords
1. Keddey v Hughes
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:experts
1. Housing Act 1988 ss27 and 28
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:fines in criminal courts
1. Asghar v Ahmed
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:freehold, statutory tenancies leading to reduction in value of
1. Murray v Lloyd
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:higher rent obtained by landlord after eviction
1. Keddey v Hughes
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:hotel rooms
1. Mehta v Royal Bank of Scotland
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:injunctions
1. Injunctions against landlords
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:licensees
1. Mehta v Royal Bank of Scotland
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:misrepresentation
1. Neil v Kingsnorth
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:mitigation
1. Wandsworth LBC v Osei-Bonsu
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:motives of landlord, establishing
1. Mafo v Adams
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:new accommodation, no surrender despite tenants indicating they had
1. Odera v Iqbal
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:occupy, right to
1. King v Jackson
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:physically excluded, where tenant not
1. Housing Act 1988 ss27 and 28
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:psychiatric harm
1. Hunt v Hussain
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:rough sleeping
1. Ogle v Bundhoo
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:set-off
1. Kaur v Gill
2. Nwokorie v Mason
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:setting aside
1. Murray v Aslam
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:surrender
1. Odera v Iqbal
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:terminate tenancy, where co-tenants wanted to
1. Wandsworth LBC v Osei-Bonsu
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:threats
1. Rubio-Manzano v Ace Lettings and Pedonomou
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:unsatisfactory accommodation, tenant spending 73 days in
1. Anslow v Hayes
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:vacant possession, eviction for sale with
1. Islam v Yap
harassment and illegal eviction, damages for:warnings to landlords
1. Keddey v Hughes
harassment and illegal eviction:abandonment
1. Housing Act 1988 ss27 and 28
2. Kalas v Farmer
harassment and illegal eviction:agents, landlords liable for acts of
1. Sampson v Wilson
harassment and illegal eviction:assured shorthold tenants
1. Melville v Bruton
harassment and illegal eviction:bailiffs, eviction without use of court
1. Haniff v Robinson
2. Francis v Brown
harassment and illegal eviction:breach of contract
1. Civil proceedings
harassment and illegal eviction:caused departure, where it is doubtful that landlord had
1. Murray v Aslam
harassment and illegal eviction:civil proceedings
1. Civil proceedings
2. Protection from Eviction Act 1977 (civil provisions)
3. Desnousse v Newham LBC
4. McCall v Abelesz
5. Mohamed v Manek and Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
6. Pirabakaran v Patel
7. Sumeghova v McMahon
8. Rogerson v Wigan MBC
harassment and illegal eviction:co-tenants wanted to terminate tenancies, where
1. Wandsworth LBC v Osei-Bonsu
harassment and illegal eviction:committal for contempt
1. Injunctions against landlords
harassment and illegal eviction:completion, purchasers let into occupation before
1. Jones v Miah
harassment and illegal eviction:contempt, committal for
1. Injunctions against landlords
2. Committal against landlords
3. Howes v Howes
4. O’Neill v Murray
5. Parsons v Nasar
6. Saxby v McKinley
7. Wright v Jess
harassment and illegal eviction:contract
1. Civil proceedings
harassment and illegal eviction:court bailiffs, eviction without use of
1. Haniff v Robinson
harassment and illegal eviction:criminal offences
1. Housing Act 1988 ss27 and 28
harassment and illegal eviction:damages
1. Injunctions against landlords
harassment and illegal eviction:direct physical interference, breach of covenant of quiet enjoyment without
1. Kenny v Preen
harassment and illegal eviction:experts
1. Housing Act 1988 ss27 and 28
harassment and illegal eviction:express terms, breach of
1. Civil proceedings
harassment and illegal eviction:failure of landlord to take action against other occupants
1. Landlord’s failure to take action against other occupants
2. Mitchell v Glasgow CC
3. Hussain v Lancaster CC
4. Lippiatt v South Gloucestershire Council
5. Mowan v Wandsworth LBC
6. O’Leary v Islington LBC
7. X and Y v Hounslow LBC
harassment and illegal eviction:gas and electricity:withdrawal
1. Housing Act 1988 ss27 and 28
harassment and illegal eviction:Housing Act 1985 sections 27 and 28
1. Housing Act 1988 ss27 and 28
2. Abbott v Bayley
3. Francis v Brown
4. Jones v Miah
5. Kalas v Farmer
6. Kaur v Gill
7. King v Jackson
8. Melville v Bruton
9. Murray v Aslam
10. Nwokorie v Mason
11. Regalgrand Ltd v Dickerson
12. Sampson v Wilson
13. Tagro v Cafane and Patel
14. Wandsworth LBC v Osei-Bonsu
harassment and illegal eviction:implied terms, breach of
1. Civil proceedings
harassment and illegal eviction:imprisonment
1. Kalas v Farmer
harassment and illegal eviction:injunctions
1. Injunctions against landlords
2. Lewis v Lewis
3. Love v Herrity
4. Parsons v Nasar
5. Patel v W H Smith (Eziot) Ltd
harassment and illegal eviction:intended purchasers as not being landlords
1. Francis v Brown
harassment and illegal eviction:keys to wrecked room as not being reinstatement, offers of
1. Tagro v Cafane and Patel
harassment and illegal eviction:landlord, definition of
1. Housing Act 1988 ss27 and 28
2. Francis v Brown
harassment and illegal eviction:lease/licence distinction
1. Civil proceedings
harassment and illegal eviction:licensees, harassment by telephone calls of
1. Khorasandjian v Bush
harassment and illegal eviction:major building works, disruption by
1. Guppys (Bridport) Ltd v Brookling
harassment and illegal eviction:nuisance and annoyance
1. Civil proceedings
2. Guppys (Bridport) Ltd v Brookling
3. Khorasandjian v Bush
4. Sampson v Hodson-Pressinger
harassment and illegal eviction:physical eviction not necessary
1. Queensway Marketing Ltd v Associated Restaurants Ltd
harassment and illegal eviction:physically excluded, where tenant not
1. Housing Act 1988 ss27 and 28
harassment and illegal eviction:police, duty of care of
1. Cowan v Chief Constable for Avon and Somerset Constabulary
harassment and illegal eviction:possession orders
1. Botu v Brent LBC
2. Haniff v Robinson
harassment and illegal eviction:Protection from Eviction Act 1977
1. Civil proceedings
2. Protection from Eviction Act 1977 (civil provisions)
3. Desnousse v Newham LBC
4. McCall v Abelesz
5. Mohamed v Manek and Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
6. Pirabakaran v Patel
7. Sumeghova v McMahon
8. Rogerson v Wigan MBC
harassment and illegal eviction:Protection from Harassment Act 1977
1. Civil proceedings
harassment and illegal eviction:purchasers:completion, purchasers let into occupation before
1. Jones v Miah
harassment and illegal eviction:purchasers:intended purchasers as not being landlords
1. Francis v Brown
harassment and illegal eviction:purchasers:landlord, definition of
1. Francis v Brown
2. Jones v Miah
harassment and illegal eviction:quiet enjoyment, covenants of
1. Civil proceedings
2. Kenny v Preen
3. Queensway Marketing Ltd v Associated Restaurants Ltd
harassment and illegal eviction:reinstatement
1. Housing Act 1988 ss27 and 28
2. Tagro v Cafane and Patel
harassment and illegal eviction:residential occupier, definition of
1. Housing Act 1988 ss27 and 28
harassment and illegal eviction:scaffolding, erection of
1. Queensway Marketing Ltd v Associated Restaurants Ltd
harassment and illegal eviction:security of tenure
1. Civil proceedings
harassment and illegal eviction:services, withdrawal of
1. Housing Act 1988 ss27 and 28
harassment and illegal eviction:set-off
1. Kalas v Farmer
2. Nwokorie v Mason
harassment and illegal eviction:set aside, where possession orders
1. Botu v Brent LBC
harassment and illegal eviction:students whilst studying, disturbance of
1. Speiro Lechouritis v Goldmile Properties Ltd
harassment and illegal eviction:telephone calls
1. Khorasandjian v Bush
harassment and illegal eviction:tort
1. Civil proceedings
harassment and illegal eviction:trespass to land
1. Patel v W H Smith (Eziot) Ltd
2. Civil proceedings
harassment and illegal eviction:valuation
1. Housing Act 1988 ss27 and 28
hard cases support
1. Introduction
hardship:alternative accommodation, prospect of finding
1. Baker v MacIver
hardship:burden of proof
1. Hodges v Blee
hardship:landlords or members of family, premises required for
1. Baker v MacIver
hardship:suitable alternative accommodation
1. Amrit Holdings Co Ltd v Shahbakhti
hazard assessments
1. Bolton MBC v Patel
hazard awareness notices
1. Local authority enforcement
health:homelessness
1. Suitability and out of area placements
health:medical advisers, opinions of
1. Shala v Birmingham CC
2. Simms v Islington LBC
3. R v Lambeth LBC ex p Walters
health:medical assessments
1. R (Adow) v Newham LBC
2. R v Medina BC ex p Dee
3. R v Lambeth LBC ex p Walters
health:medical evidence
1. Allison v Wandsworth LBC
2. Hijazi v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
health:medical treatment
1. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Avdic
health:prejudicial to health
1. Criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 and other Acts
2. Birmingham CC v Oakley
3. R v Bristol CC ex p Everett
4. SFI Group plc v Gosport BC
5. R (Vella) v Lambeth LBC and London and Quadrant Housing Trust
6. Southwark LBC v Simpson
health:single men with health problems, inadequate enquiries about
1. Benson v Lewisham LBC
health:subtenancies
1. McLoughlin’s Curator Bonis v Motherwell DC
health:suitability of accommodation
1. R v Lewisham LBC ex p Dolan
health:tuberculosis, temporary absences due to
1. Wigley v Leigh
hearsay evidence :appeals
1. Anti-social behaviour (Housing Acts 1985 and 1988)
hearsay evidence :careful assessment
1. Anti-social behaviour (Housing Acts 1985 and 1988)
hearsay evidence :improvements in behaviour, admissibility despite
1. Solon South West Housing Association Ltd v James
hearsay evidence :injunctions
1. Moat Housing Group South Ltd v Harris and Hartless
2. Wear Valley DC v Robson
hearsay evidence :nuisance and annoyance
1. Anti-social behaviour (Housing Acts 1985 and 1988)
2. Solon South West Housing Association Ltd v James
heating:condensation
1. Carr v Hackney LBC
2. Farrar v Dover CC
3. Pike v Sefton MBC
heating:damages
1. Ferguson v Jones
heating:different system, installing a
1. Creska Ltd v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
heating:disrepair
1. Creska Ltd v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
2. Ferguson v Jones
3. Sarmad v Okello
heating:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under:background
1. Pringle v Hackney LBC
heating:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under:condensation
1. Carr v Hackney LBC
2. Farrar v Dover CC
3. Pike v Sefton MBC
heating:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under:failure to use
1. Farrar v Dover CC
2. Pike v Sefton MBC
heating:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under:nuisance
1. Greater London Council v Tower Hamlets LBC
heating:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under:statutory nuisance
1. Greater London Council v Tower Hamlets LBC
heating:failure to use
1. Farrar v Dover CC
2. Pike v Sefton MBC
heating:nuisance
1. Greater London Council v Tower Hamlets LBC
heating:service charges and long leases
1. Pole Properties Ltd v Feinberg
heating:statutory nuisance
1. Greater London Council v Tower Hamlets LBC
high or low rent, tenancies at a :compulsory letting at low rent
1. Urbárska Obec Trencianske Biskupice v Slovakia
high or low rent, tenancies at a :gas and electricity of bills as not being rent, payment of
1. Bostock v Bryant and Another
high or low rent, tenancies at a :informal arrangements, low rent under
1. Royal Philanthropic Society v County
high or low rent, tenancies at a :London
1. Tenancies at a high or low rent (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 paras 2 and 3 and Rent Act 1977 ss4–5)
high or low rent, tenancies at a :security of tenure
1. Tenancies at a high or low rent (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 paras 2 and 3 and Rent Act 1977 ss4–5)
2. Bostock v Bryant and Another
high or low rent, tenancies at a :shams
1. Bhopal v Walia
high or low rent, tenancies at a :written agreements for higher rent
1. Bhopal v Walia
highways :roots of trees, highway authorities responsible for
1. Delaware Mansions Ltd v City of Westminster
HMOs (Houses in Multiple Occupation)
1. Local authority enforcement
holiday lets:assured tenancies
1. Holiday lets (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 9 and Rent Act 1977 s9)
2. Buchmann v May
3. Killick v Roberts
4. R v Rent Officer for Camden LBC ex p Plant
5. McHale v Daneham
holiday lets:business use, covenants against
1. Caradon DC v Paton
holiday lets:chalets
1. Nutt v Read
holiday lets:fraud by tenants
1. Killick v Roberts
holiday lets:injunctions
1. Caradon DC v Paton
holiday lets:reality of situation
1. R v Rent Officer for Camden LBC ex p Plant
holiday lets:rescission
1. Killick v Roberts
holiday lets:security of tenure
1. Holiday lets (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 9 and Rent Act 1977 s9)
2. Buchmann v May
3. Killick v Roberts
4. R v Rent Officer for Camden LBC ex p Plant
5. McHale v Daneham
holiday lets:shams
1. Buchmann v May
holiday lets:working holidays
1. McHale v Daneham
home loss and disturbance payments
1. Home loss and disturbance payments
homelessness, definition of
1. The meaning of ‘homelessness’
homelessness, definition of:accommodation, definition of
1. ‘Accommodation’
2. R v Brent LBC ex p Awua
3. R v Ealing LBC ex p Sidhu
homelessness, definition of:employers’ offered to re-employ and re-accommodate applicants, where
1. R v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p Minton
homelessness, definition of:entry, inability to secure
1. Inability to secure entry to accommodation/no place to keep moveable structure: s175(2)
2. R v Chiltern DC ex p Roberts
3. R v Hillingdon LBC ex p Bax
homelessness, definition of:execution of warrants for possession, not homeless until
1. R (Sacupima) v Newham LBC
homelessness, definition of:houseboat owners without permanent moorings
1. R v Hillingdon LBC ex p Bax
homelessness, definition of:intentional homelessness
1. Reasonable to continue to occupy: s175(3)
homelessness, definition of:licensees:cruise, licence of houseboats to
1. R v Hillingdon LBC ex p Bax
homelessness, definition of:licensees:houseboat owners without permanent moorings
1. R v Hillingdon LBC ex p Bax
homelessness, definition of:licensees:leave, where asked to leave
1. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p O’Sullivan
homelessness, definition of:licensees:unprotected
1. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p O’Sullivan
homelessness, definition of:notice to quit
1. Fletcher v Brent LBC
homelessness, definition of:occupation, rights of
1. R (B) v Southwark LBC
2. Rights of occupation: s175(1)
3. Abdullah v Westminster CC
4. Fletcher v Brent LBC
5. R (Sacupima) v Newham LBC
6. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p O’Sullivan
7. R v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p Minton
homelessness, definition of:prisoners
1. R (B) v Southwark LBC
homelessness, definition of:reasonableness to continue to occupy
1. The meaning of ‘homelessness’
2. Reasonable to continue to occupy: s175(3)
homelessness, definition of:short-term accommodation
1. R v Brent LBC ex p Awua
homelessness, definition of:temporary accommodation
1. R v Brent LBC ex p Awua
homelessness, definition of:threats
1. Reasonable to continue to occupy: s175(3)
homelessness, definition of:travelling shows
1. R v Chiltern DC ex p Roberts
homelessness, definition of:women’s refuges
1. R v Ealing LBC ex p Sidhu
homelessness, offers:guidance
1. Ravichandran v Lewisham LBC
homelessness, offers:other authorities, applications to
1. Applications to other authorities
2. R v Slough BC ex p Ealing LBC
3. R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Camden LBC
homelessness, offers:out of area placements
1. Suitability and out of area placements
2. R (Yumsak) v Enfield LBC
3. R (W) v Sheffield CC
homelessness, offers:overcrowding
1. Osei v Southwark LBC
homelessness, offers:parents of EU nationals
1. Harrow LBC v Ibrahim
2. Teixeira v Lambeth LBC
homelessness, offers:permanent accommodation
1. R (Bibi (No 1) and Al-Nashed) v Newham LBC
2. R v Newham LBC ex p Miah (Askir)
homelessness, offers:personal circumstances
1. R v Brent LBC ex p Omar
homelessness, offers:Poor Laws
1. Introduction
homelessness, offers:possession orders
1. Green and Coyne v Croydon LBC
homelessness, offers:preferences
1. General
2. R (Lin) v Barnet LBC
homelessness, offers:pregnant women
1. Suitability and out of area placements
2. R v Newham LBC ex p Dada
homelessness, offers:prejudgment of cases
1. Lewisham LBC v Adeyemi/Lewisham LBC v Akinsola
homelessness, offers:prisoners
1. R (B) v Southwark LBC
homelessness, offers:Protection from Eviction Act 1977
1. Desnousse v Newham LBC
2. Rogerson v Wigan MBC
homelessness, offers:reasonable belief in homelessness
1. R v Islington LBC ex p B
homelessness, offers:reasonable preferences
1. R (Lin) v Barnet LBC
homelessness, offers:reasonableness of offers
1. R v Wandsworth LBC ex p Wingrove and Mansoor
2. R v Newham LBC ex p Ojuri (No 5)
homelessness, offers:refusal
1. Griffiths v St Helens Council
homelessness, offers:refusal of offers
1. Griffiths v St Helens Council
2. Vilvarasa v Harrow LBC
homelessness, offers:rent arrears
1. Green and Coyne v Croydon LBC
2. R v Wyre BC ex p Joyce
3. R v Newham LBC ex p Miah (Askir)
homelessness, offers:repeat/fresh applications
1. Repeat/fresh applications
2. R v Harrow LBC ex p Fahia
3. Tower Hamlets LBC v Begum (Rikha)
4. G v Haringey LBC
5. R (Griffin) v Southwark LBC
6. Ali v Camden LBC
homelessness, offers:resident permits, refusal of
1. R (Burns) v Southwark LBC
homelessness, offers:restrictions on applications
1. Applications by homeless people
homelessness, offers:right to reside
1. Harrow LBC v Ibrahim
2. Teixeira v Lambeth LBC
3. Zambrano v Office National de l’Emploi
4. Lekpo-Bozua v Hackney LBC
5. R (Mohamed) v Harrow LBC
homelessness, offers:same day policy
1. R (Khazai) v Birmingham CC
homelessness, offers:section of legislation offers made, must be clear under which
1. Ravichandran v Lewisham LBC
homelessness, offers:security of tenure
1. R v Newham LBC ex p Ojuri (No 5)
2. R v Westminster CC ex p Abdulkadir
homelessness, offers:settled accommodation
1. R v Brent LBC ex p Awua
2. R v Wandsworth LBC ex p Wingrove and Mansoor
homelessness, offers:short-term accommodation
1. R v Brent LBC ex p Awua
homelessness, offers:social security
1. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Duro-Rama
homelessness, offers:spouses and partners, separation from
1. R (Griffin) v Southwark LBC
homelessness, offers:succession
1. Sharp v Brent LBC
homelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:adaptions, assurances that work would be done on
1. Boreh v Ealing LBC
homelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:affordability
1. Suitability and out of area placements
homelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:babies, women with
1. R v Newham LBC ex p Dada
homelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:bed and breakfast
1. Suitability and out of area placements
2. Codona v Mid-Bedfordshire DC
3. R v Newham LBC ex p Ojuri (No 3)
homelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:continuing duty, as
1. R (Zaher) v Westminster CC
homelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:damages
1. R v Ealing LBC ex p Parkinson
2. R (Morris) v Newham LBC
homelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:deferral of duty
1. R v Newham LBC ex p Begum (Mashuda)
homelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:discharge of duty
1. Suitability and out of area placements
homelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:enquiries
1. R v Sedgemoor DC ex p McCarthy
homelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:exceptional circumstances
1. R (W) v Sheffield CC
homelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:family, proximity to
1. Suitability and out of area placements
2. R (Yumsak) v Enfield LBC
homelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:Gypsies and Travellers
1. Codona v Mid-Bedfordshire DC
2. Lee v Rhondda Cynon Taf CBC
3. R (Maughan) v Leicester CC
4. R (Price) v Carmarthenshire CC
homelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:housing benefit shortfall
1. R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Kaur
homelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:injunctions
1. R (Khan) v Newham LBC
homelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:interim accommodation
1. R (Flash) v Southwark LBC
homelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:Kurdish/Turkish community when applicant in fear of community, perverse placement in
1. R v Haringey LBC ex p Karaman
homelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:long term but suitable for short term, accommodation not reasonable for
1. Birmingham CC v Ali and Aweys; Moran v Manchester CC
homelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:medical factors
1. R v Lewisham LBC ex p Dolan
homelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:one-bedroom flats for grandmother and grandson
1. R (Flash) v Southwark LBC
homelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:out of area placements
1. Suitability and out of area placements
2. R (Yumsak) v Enfield LBC
3. R (W) v Sheffield CC
homelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:personal circumstances
1. R v Brent LBC ex p Omar
2. R v Newham LBC ex p Ojuri (No 3)
homelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:pregnant women
1. Suitability and out of area placements
2. R v Newham LBC ex p Dada
homelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:private and family life and home, right to respect for
1. R (Morris) v Newham LBC
2. R (Price) v Carmarthenshire CC
3. R (Yumsak) v Enfield LBC
homelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:reviews
1. Osseily v Westminster CC
homelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:social grounds, suitability on
1. R v Lewisham LBC ex p Dolan
homelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:substitution of own views by recorders
1. Watson v Wandsworth LBC
homelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:support services, proximity to
1. Suitability and out of area placements
homelessness, offers:suitability of accommodation:Wales
1. Suitability and out of area placements
homelessness, offers:support services, proximity to
1. Suitability and out of area placements
homelessness, offers:systems failure
1. R (Anonymous) v Southwark LBC
2. R (Kelly) v Birmingham CC
homelessness, offers:temporary accommodation
1. Rogerson v Wigan MBC
2. R v Brent LBC ex p Awua
homelessness, offers:third parties, accommodation provided by
1. R v Bristol CC ex p Browne
homelessness, offers:threats of homelessness
1. Reasonable to continue to occupy: s175(3)
homelessness, offers:transfer, reasonable belief in homelessness and
1. R v Islington LBC ex p B
homelessness, offers:translation of letters
1. Ali v Birmingham CC
homelessness, offers:translation of offer letters
1. Ali v Birmingham CC
homelessness, offers:travelling shows
1. R v Chiltern DC ex p Roberts
homelessness, offers:trespassers
1. R v Hillingdon LBC ex p McDonagh
homelessness, offers:unemployed
1. R (Mohamed) v Harrow LBC
homelessness, offers:unfair contract terms
1. Khatun, Zeb and Iqbal v Newham LBC and Office of Fair Trading
homelessness, offers:view accommodation, opportunity to
1. Khatun, Zeb and Iqbal v Newham LBC and Office of Fair Trading
homelessness, offers:Wales
1. Suitability and out of area placements
homelessness, offers:warnings
1. Muse v Brent LBC
2. Vilvarasa v Harrow LBC
homelessness, offers:women’s refuge
1. R v Ealing LBC ex p Sidhu
2. Birmingham CC v Ali and Aweys; Moran v Manchester CC
homelessness, offers:workers, definition of
1. Barry v Southwark LBC
homelessness:abroad, accommodation situated
1. Osei v Southwark LBC
2. R v Camden LBC ex p Aranda
3. R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Monaf
4. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Duro-Rama
5. R v Newham LBC ex p Ajayi
6. R v Westminster CC ex p Augustin
homelessness:accommodation, definition of
1. ‘Accommodation’
2. R v Brent LBC ex p Awua
3. R v Ealing LBC ex p Sidhu
homelessness:adaptions, assurances that work would be done on
1. Boreh v Ealing LBC
homelessness:affordability
1. Odunsi v Brent LBC
2. Suitability and out of area placements
homelessness:allocation
1. General
2. R (Lin) v Barnet LBC
homelessness:alternative accommodation, refusal of
1. Muse v Brent LBC
homelessness:applications
1. Applications by homeless people
2. R (Khazai) v Birmingham CC
homelessness:appropriate arrangements for applications
1. R v Camden LBC ex p Gillan
homelessness:assurances that work would be done
1. Boreh v Ealing LBC
homelessness:assured shorthold tenancies, refusal of
1. Griffiths v St Helens Council
homelessness:babies, women with
1. R v Brent LBC ex p Yusuf
2. R v Newham LBC ex p Dada
homelessness:bed and breakfast:all homeless households in B&Bs, policy of booking
1. R v Newham LBC ex p Ojuri (No 3)
homelessness:bed and breakfast:children or pregnant women
1. Suitability and out of area placements
homelessness:bed and breakfast:dwelling, as not being a
1. R v Newham LBC ex p Ojuri (No 5)
homelessness:bed and breakfast:gypsies
1. Codona v Mid-Bedfordshire DC
homelessness:bed and breakfast:individual needs, consideration of
1. R v Newham LBC ex p Ojuri (No 3)
homelessness:bed and breakfast:private and family life and home, right to respect for
1. Orejudos v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
homelessness:bed and breakfast:signing in rules, refusal to comply with
1. Orejudos v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
homelessness:bed and breakfast:suitability
1. Suitability and out of area placements
homelessness:blanket same day policies
1. R (Khazai) v Birmingham CC
homelessness:carers, need for
1. Ali v Camden LBC
homelessness:challenges
1. R v Hillingdon LBC ex p Puhlhofer
homelessness:children:babies, women with
1. R v Newham LBC ex p Dada
homelessness:children:bed and breakfast
1. Suitability and out of area placements
homelessness:children:dependants, applications from
1. R v Oldham MBC ex p Garlick; R v Bexley LBC ex p Bentum
homelessness:children:eligibility
1. Harrow LBC v Ibrahim
2. Teixeira v Lambeth LBC
homelessness:children:medical examinations
1. R v Lambeth LBC ex p Walters
homelessness:children:school age, of
1. Harrow LBC v Ibrahim
2. Teixeira v Lambeth LBC
homelessness:clear explanations of offers
1. Griffiths v St Helens Council
homelessness:competence
1. Competence to make an application
2. R v Oldham MBC ex p Garlick; R v Bexley LBC ex p Bentum
3. R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Ferdous Begum
4. R v Camden LBC ex p Hersi
5. R v Hillingdon LBC ex p Streeting
homelessness:damages
1. R v Northavon DC ex p Palmer
homelessness:definition
1. The meaning of ‘homelessness’
homelessness:dependants, applications from
1. R v Oldham MBC ex p Garlick; R v Bexley LBC ex p Bentum
homelessness:disability living allowance
1. Ali v Camden LBC
homelessness:discrimination
1. Pieretti v Enfield LBC
homelessness:domestic violence
1. Reasonable to continue to occupy: s175(3)
homelessness:duty:acceptance
1. R v Northavon DC ex p Palmer
homelessness:duty:damages
1. R v Northavon DC ex p Palmer
homelessness:EEA nationals
1. Zambrano v Office National de l’Emploi
2. R (Burns) v Southwark LBC
3. R (Mohamed) v Harrow LBC
homelessness:eligibility for assistance
1. Eligibility
2. Harrow LBC v Ibrahim
3. Teixeira v Lambeth LBC
4. Zambrano v Office National de l’Emploi
5. Barry v Southwark LBC
6. Lekpo-Bozua v Hackney LBC
7. R (Morris) v Westminster CC
8. R (Burns) v Southwark LBC
9. R (Mohamed) v Harrow LBC
homelessness:employers’ offered to re-employ and re-accommodate applicants, where
1. R v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p Minton
homelessness:employment, impact on
1. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Duro-Rama
homelessness:enquiries
1. Enquiries
2. Green and Coyne v Croydon LBC
3. Pieretti v Enfield LBC
4. R v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p Bayani
5. R v Sevenoaks DC ex p Reynolds
6. R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Khatun (Shafia)
7. R v Westminster CC ex p Augustin
8. Robinson v Brent LBC
9. Williams v Birmingham CC
10. R v Dacorum BC ex p Brown
11. R v Gravesham BC ex p Winchester
12. R v Hackney LBC ex p Decordova
13. R v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p Silchenstedt
14. R v Lambeth LBC ex p Walters
15. R v Nottingham CC ex p Costello
16. R v Poole BC ex p Cooper
17. R v Sedgemoor DC ex p McCarthy
18. R v Westminster CC ex p Iqbal
19. R v Woodspring DC ex p Walters
20. R v Wyre BC ex p Joyce
21. Odunsi v Brent LBC
homelessness:entry, inability to secure
1. Inability to secure entry to accommodation/no place to keep moveable structure: s175(2)
2. R v Chiltern DC ex p Roberts
3. R v Hillingdon LBC ex p Bax
homelessness:EU nationals
1. Eligibility
2. Harrow LBC v Ibrahim
3. Teixeira v Lambeth LBC
4. Zambrano v Office National de l’Emploi
5. Barry v Southwark LBC
6. Lekpo-Bozua v Hackney LBC
homelessness:exactly the same facts test
1. Repeat/fresh applications
2. R v Harrow LBC ex p Fahia
3. R (Griffin) v Southwark LBC
homelessness:exceptional circumstances
1. Shrewsbury and Atcham BC v Evans
homelessness:execution of warrants for possession, not homeless until
1. R (Sacupima) v Newham LBC
homelessness:experts, new material from
1. G v Haringey LBC
homelessness:explanation of offers in letters
1. Griffiths v St Helens Council
homelessness:false statements
1. Lewisham LBC v Adeyemi/Lewisham LBC v Akinsola
2. Rushcliffe BC v Watson
3. Shrewsbury and Atcham BC v Evans
homelessness:family:applications used to circumvent decisions
1. R v Camden LBC ex p Hersi
homelessness:family:discharge of duty
1. R v Camden LBC ex p Hersi
homelessness:family:proximity to family
1. Suitability and out of area placements
homelessness:form of applications
1. R v Chiltern DC ex p Roberts
homelessness:freedom of information
1. R v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p Bayani
homelessness:further offers refused
1. Akhtar v Birmingham CC
homelessness:gatekeeping approach
1. Gate-keeping
2. Edwards and others v Birmingham City Council
3. R (Anonymous) v Southwark LBC
4. R (Kelly) v Birmingham CC
5. R (Khazai) v Birmingham CC
6. R (Raw) v Lambeth LBC
homelessness:guidance
1. Ravichandran v Lewisham LBC
homelessness:Gypsies and Travellers:bed and breakfast accommodation
1. Codona v Mid-Bedfordshire DC
homelessness:Gypsies and Travellers:clearance of sites
1. Basildon DC v McCarthy
homelessness:Gypsies and Travellers:cultural aversion to bricks and mortar
1. Codona v Mid-Bedfordshire DC
2. Lee v Rhondda Cynon Taf CBC
3. R (Maughan) v Leicester CC
4. R (Price) v Carmarthenshire CC
homelessness:Gypsies and Travellers:private and family life, right to respect for
1. Codona v Mid-Bedfordshire DC
2. R (Maughan) v Leicester CC
3. R (Price) v Carmarthenshire CC
homelessness:Gypsies and Travellers:suitability
1. Codona v Mid-Bedfordshire DC
2. Lee v Rhondda Cynon Taf CBC
homelessness:health needs
1. Suitability and out of area placements
homelessness:hostels:Protection from Eviction Act 1977
1. Rogerson v Wigan MBC
homelessness:houseboat owners without permanent moorings
1. R v Hillingdon LBC ex p Bax
homelessness:immigration control, persons subject to
1. Eligibility
2. Lekpo-Bozua v Hackney LBC
homelessness:interim accommodation duties and powers
1. Mohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
homelessness:interim accommodation duties and powers:blanket same day policies
1. R (Khazai) v Birmingham CC
homelessness:interim accommodation duties and powers:one-bedroom flats for grandmother and grandson
1. R (Flash) v Southwark LBC
homelessness:interim accommodation duties and powers:suitability
1. R (Flash) v Southwark LBC
homelessness:interim accommodation duties and powers:system failures
1. R (Anonymous) v Southwark LBC
2. R (Kelly) v Birmingham CC
homelessness:interviews:necessity
1. R v Sevenoaks DC ex p Reynolds
homelessness:interviews:notes, without taking
1. R v Dacorum BC ex p Brown
homelessness:interviews:questioning inhibiting applicants from stating case
1. R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Khatun (Shafia)
homelessness:interviews:sympathetically, to be conducted
1. R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Khatun (Shafia)
homelessness:Kurdish/Turkish community when applicant in fear of community,:perverse placement in
1. R v Haringey LBC ex p Karaman
homelessness:labels
1. Family Housing Association v Jones
homelessness:lawfully in UK, duties owed to all persons
1. R v Hillingdon LBC ex p Streeting
homelessness:legitimate expectations
1. R (Bibi (No 1) and Al-Nashed) v Newham LBC
homelessness:length of tenure, reasonableness of
1. R v Wandsworth LBC ex p Wingrove and Mansoor
homelessness:letters:applications can be made by
1. R v Chiltern DC ex p Roberts
homelessness:letters:clear explanations of offers
1. Griffiths v St Helens Council
homelessness:Lettings Direct Scheme, referrals to
1. R (Raw) v Lambeth LBC
homelessness:licences
1. Desnousse v Newham LBC
2. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p O’Sullivan
3. R v Hillingdon LBC ex p Bax
homelessness:licences:licence/tenancy distinction
1. Brennan v Lambeth LBC
2. Family Housing Association v Jones
homelessness:long term but suitable for short term, accommodation not reasonable for
1. Birmingham CC v Ali and Aweys; Moran v Manchester CC
homelessness:main housing duty, discharge of
1. Local connection and referral
homelessness:material changes of circumstances test
1. Repeat/fresh applications
2. Tower Hamlets LBC v Begum (Rikha)
3. Ali v Camden LBC
homelessness:medical advisers, reliance on opinions of
1. R v Lambeth LBC ex p Walters
homelessness:medical records
1. R v Lambeth LBC ex p Walters
homelessness:mental capacity
1. R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Ferdous Begum
homelessness:mental health issues, notice to persons with
1. R v Westminster CC ex p Abdulkadir
homelessness:National Assistance Act 1948
1. Introduction
homelessness:notice:mental health issues, persons with
1. R v Westminster CC ex p Abdulkadir
homelessness:notice:quit, to
1. Fletcher v Brent LBC
homelessness:notice:reasonableness
1. R v Newham LBC ex p Ojuri (No 5)
homelessness:notice:short notice
1. R v Westminster CC ex p Abdulkadir
homelessness:nuisance or annoyance
1. R v Bristol CC ex p Bradic
2. Griffiths v St Helens MBC
3. R v Swansea CC ex p John
4. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p P
5. R v Newham LBC ex p Campbell
homelessness:occupation, rights of
1. R (B) v Southwark LBC
2. Rights of occupation: s175(1)
3. Abdullah v Westminster CC
4. Fletcher v Brent LBC
5. R (Sacupima) v Newham LBC
6. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p O’Sullivan
7. R v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p Minton
homelessness:offers:alternative accommodation, refusal of
1. Muse v Brent LBC
homelessness:offers:explanations in letters, clear
1. Griffiths v St Helens Council
homelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation
1. The meaning of ‘homelessness’
2. Reasonable to continue to occupy: s175(3)
homelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:abroad, property situated
1. Osei v Southwark LBC
2. R v Camden LBC ex p Aranda
3. R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Monaf
4. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Duro-Rama
5. R v Newham LBC ex p Ajayi
homelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:affordability
1. Reasonable to continue to occupy: s175(3)
2. R v Brent LBC ex p Baruwa
3. R v Brent LBC ex p Grossett
4. R v Croydon LBC ex p Graham
5. R v Wandsworth LBC ex p Hawthorne
6. R v Hillingdon LBC ex p Tinn
homelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:assured shorthold tenancies, reasonableness of remaining until court orders of persons with
1. R v Croydon LBC ex p Jarvis
homelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:availability of accommodation
1. ‘Available’ accommodation: s176
2. Begum (Nipa) v Tower Hamlets LBC
3. Oxford CC v Bull
4. R v Westminster CC ex p Bishop
5. R v Barking and Dagenham LBC ex p Okuneye
6. R v Hackney LBC ex p Tonnicodi
7. R v Lambeth LBC ex p Ly
8. R v Newham LBC ex p Khan and Hussain
9. R v Peterborough CC ex p Carr
homelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:balancing circumstances
1. Noh v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
homelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:children
1. R v Brent LBC ex p Yusuf
2. R v Medina BC ex p Dee
homelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:current occupation
1. Waltham Forest LBC v Maloba
homelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:definition of homelessness
1. The meaning of ‘homelessness’
2. Reasonable to continue to occupy: s175(3)
homelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:discharge of duty
1. Suitability and out of area placements
homelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:domestic violence
1. Reasonable to continue to occupy: s175(3)
2. Yemshaw v Hounslow LBC
3. Bond v Leicester CC
4. R v Croydon LBC ex p Toth
5. R v Newham LBC ex p McIlroy
homelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:duration of stay in accommodation
1. Kacar v Enfield LBC
homelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:ex-spouses, being expected to reside with
1. R v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p Moncada
homelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:fire safety, inadequacy of
1. R v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p Ben-El-Mabrouk
homelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:general housing circumstances in area, assessment of
1. R v Brent LBC ex p Bariise
2. R v Newham LBC ex p Tower Hamlets LBC
homelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:intentional homelessness
1. Reasonable to continue to occupy: s175(3)
2. Noh v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
3. R v Brent LBC ex p Yusuf
4. Reasonable to continue to occupy
homelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:isolated accommodation
1. Kacar v Enfield LBC
homelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:matrimonial home
1. R v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p Moncada
homelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:medical advice that property unsuitable for babies
1. R v Medina BC ex p Dee
homelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:other authority areas, assessment of
1. R v Newham LBC ex p Tower Hamlets LBC
homelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:overcrowding
1. Elrify v Westminster CC
2. Harouki v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
3. R v Westminster CC ex p Alouat
4. Sabah Mohamoud v Greenwich LBC
homelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:personal circumstances
1. Noh v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
homelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:physical conditions
1. R v Broxbourne BC ex p Willmoth
2. Elrify v Westminster CC
3. Harouki v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
4. R v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p Ben-El-Mabrouk
5. R v Medina BC ex p Dee
6. R v Westminster CC ex p Alouat
7. Sabah Mohamoud v Greenwich LBC
homelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:pregnant women leaving property not suitable for baby
1. R v Brent LBC ex p Yusuf
homelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:psychiatric evidence
1. Noh v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
homelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:reasons
1. R v Northampton BC ex p Clarkson
homelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:service licensees
1. R v Portsmouth CC ex p Knight
homelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:spouses, accommodation not available to
1. Hemans v Windsor and Maidenhead RBC
homelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:subjective test
1. R v Brent LBC ex p McManus
homelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:threats
1. Threatened with homelessness: s175(4)
homelessness and reasonableness of continued occupation:trespasser, not reasonable for service licensee to remain as a
1. R v Portsmouth CC ex p Knight
homelessness assistance, eligibility for
1. Eligibility
2. Harrow LBC v Ibrahim
3. Teixeira v Lambeth LBC
4. Zambrano v Office National de l’Emploi
5. Barry v Southwark LBC
6. Lekpo-Bozua v Hackney LBC
7. R (Morris) v Westminster CC
8. R (Burns) v Southwark LBC
9. R (Mohamed) v Harrow LBC
homelessness assistance, eligibility for:abroad, persons from
1. Eligibility
homelessness assistance, eligibility for:children
1. Harrow LBC v Ibrahim
2. Teixeira v Lambeth LBC
homelessness assistance, eligibility for:dependents
1. Zambrano v Office National de l’Emploi
homelessness assistance, eligibility for:EEA nationals:dependants
1. Zambrano v Office National de l’Emploi
homelessness assistance, eligibility for:EEA nationals:resident permits, refusal of
1. R (Burns) v Southwark LBC
homelessness assistance, eligibility for:EEA nationals:right to reside
1. Zambrano v Office National de l’Emploi
2. R (Mohamed) v Harrow LBC
homelessness assistance, eligibility for:EEA nationals:unemployed
1. R (Mohamed) v Harrow LBC
homelessness assistance, eligibility for:EU nationals
1. Eligibility
2. Harrow LBC v Ibrahim
3. Teixeira v Lambeth LBC
4. Zambrano v Office National de l’Emploi
homelessness assistance, eligibility for:EU nationals:dependents
1. Zambrano v Office National de l’Emploi
homelessness assistance, eligibility for:EU nationals:immigration control, persons subject to
1. Lekpo-Bozua v Hackney LBC
homelessness assistance, eligibility for:EU nationals:parents
1. Harrow LBC v Ibrahim
2. Teixeira v Lambeth LBC
homelessness assistance, eligibility for:EU nationals:right to reside
1. Harrow LBC v Ibrahim
2. Lekpo-Bozua v Hackney LBC
homelessness assistance, eligibility for:EU nationals:school age, children of
1. Harrow LBC v Ibrahim
2. Teixeira v Lambeth LBC
homelessness assistance, eligibility for:EU nationals:workers, definition of
1. Barry v Southwark LBC
homelessness assistance, eligibility for:immigration control, persons subject to
1. Eligibility
2. Lekpo-Bozua v Hackney LBC
homelessness assistance, eligibility for:parents
1. Harrow LBC v Ibrahim
2. Teixeira v Lambeth LBC
homelessness assistance, eligibility for:resident permits, refusal of
1. R (Burns) v Southwark LBC
homelessness assistance, eligibility for:right to reside
1. Harrow LBC v Ibrahim
2. Teixeira v Lambeth LBC
3. Zambrano v Office National de l’Emploi
4. Lekpo-Bozua v Hackney LBC
5. R (Mohamed) v Harrow LBC
homelessness assistance, eligibility for:school age, children of
1. Harrow LBC v Ibrahim
2. Teixeira v Lambeth LBC
homelessness assistance, eligibility for:unemployed
1. R (Mohamed) v Harrow LBC
homelessness assistance, eligibility for:workers, definition of
1. Barry v Southwark LBC
homelessness decisions, appeals against
1. Appeals
homelessness decisions, appeals against:adjournments
1. Berhane v Lambeth LBC
homelessness decisions, appeals against:agents, notification of decisions to
1. Dharmaraj v Hounslow LBC
homelessness decisions, appeals against:benefit to applicants, entertaining appeals on withdrawn review decisions where orders would be of
1. Tower Hamlets LBC v Deugi
homelessness decisions, appeals against:civil rights and obligations
1. Tomlinson v Birmingham CC (Ali v Birmingham CC)
homelessness decisions, appeals against:costs
1. R v Lambeth LBC ex p Wilson
homelessness decisions, appeals against:county courts
1. Which court?
2. Appeals
homelessness decisions, appeals against:county courts:adjournments
1. Berhane v Lambeth LBC
homelessness decisions, appeals against:county courts:further review, prescribing conduct of
1. Adan v Newham LBC
homelessness decisions, appeals against:court, powers of
1. Berhane v Lambeth LBC
2. Appeals: courts’ powers
3. Adan v Newham LBC
4. Ali and Nessa v Newham LBC
5. Ekwuru v Westminster CC
6. Kruja v Enfield LBC
7. Tower Hamlets LBC v Deugi
homelessness decisions, appeals against:court closed, time limits where
1. Aadan v Brent LBC
2. Van Aken v Camden LBC
homelessness decisions, appeals against:date of notification of original review, time running from
1. Demetri v Westminster CC
homelessness decisions, appeals against:defective review decisions, series of
1. Ekwuru v Westminster CC
homelessness decisions, appeals against:disabled applicants having problems finding solicitors, time limits where
1. Barrett v Southwark LBC
homelessness decisions, appeals against:extension of time
1. Aadan v Brent LBC
homelessness decisions, appeals against:fact-finding role, judges wrongly usurping council’s
1. Kruja v Enfield LBC
homelessness decisions, appeals against:fair hearing, right to a
1. Begum (Runa) v Tower Hamlets LBC
2. Tomlinson v Birmingham CC (Ali v Birmingham CC)
homelessness decisions, appeals against:fees, payment of correct
1. Amen v Westminster CC
homelessness decisions, appeals against:fraud, wasted costs orders in absence of
1. R v Lambeth LBC ex p Wilson
homelessness decisions, appeals against:further review, prescribing conduct of
1. Adan v Newham LBC
homelessness decisions, appeals against:Housing Act 1996, before
1. Which court?
homelessness decisions, appeals against:inevitably reached, decisions quashed unless same decision would be
1. Ali and Nessa v Newham LBC
homelessness decisions, appeals against:injustice, where no obvious
1. Gentle v Wandsworth LBC
homelessness decisions, appeals against:intentional homelessness
1. Ekwuru v Westminster CC
homelessness decisions, appeals against:judicial review
1. R (Van der Stolk) v Camden LBC
homelessness decisions, appeals against:notification of decisions to agents or applicants
1. Dharmaraj v Hounslow LBC
homelessness decisions, appeals against:permission for second appeals
1. Azimi v Newham LBC
2. Gentle v Wandsworth LBC
homelessness decisions, appeals against:points of law
1. Appeals
homelessness decisions, appeals against:quashing decisions
1. Ali and Nessa v Newham LBC
2. Kruja v Enfield LBC
homelessness decisions, appeals against:reviews:defective review decisions, series of
1. Ekwuru v Westminster CC
homelessness decisions, appeals against:reviews:notification of right
1. Review
homelessness decisions, appeals against:reviews:points of law
1. Appeals
homelessness decisions, appeals against:reviews:refusal
1. R v Westminster CC ex p Ellioua
homelessness decisions, appeals against:reviews:withdrawn decisions, on
1. Tower Hamlets LBC v Deugi
homelessness decisions, appeals against:route of appeal
1. Which court?
homelessness decisions, appeals against:second appeals
1. Second appeals: appeals to the Court of Appeal
2. Azimi v Newham LBC
3. Gentle v Wandsworth LBC
homelessness decisions, appeals against:solicitors, problems finding
1. Barrett v Southwark LBC
homelessness decisions, appeals against:staying costs orders pending fresh appeals
1. Waltham Forest LBC v Maloba
homelessness decisions, appeals against:time limits
1. Appeals: time limits, bringing an appeal and fees
2. Aadan v Brent LBC
homelessness decisions, appeals against:time limits:agents or applications, notification of decisions to
1. Dharmaraj v Hounslow LBC
homelessness decisions, appeals against:time limits:court closed, where
1. Aadan v Brent LBC
2. Van Aken v Camden LBC
homelessness decisions, appeals against:time limits:date of notification of original review, time running from
1. Demetri v Westminster CC
homelessness decisions, appeals against:time limits:disabled applicants having problems finding solicitors
1. Barrett v Southwark LBC
homelessness decisions, appeals against:time limits:extension
1. Aadan v Brent LBC
2. Barrett v Southwark LBC
3. Short v Birmingham CC
homelessness decisions, appeals against:time limits:final day of limits
1. Van Aken v Camden LBC
homelessness decisions, appeals against:time limits:good reason or good cause
1. Barrett v Southwark LBC
2. Short v Birmingham CC
homelessness decisions, appeals against:time limits:judicial review
1. R (Van der Stolk) v Camden LBC
homelessness decisions, appeals against:wasted costs orders
1. R v Lambeth LBC ex p Wilson
homelessness decisions, appeals against:withdrawal of review decisions
1. Tower Hamlets LBC v Deugi
homelessness decisions, judicial review of:appeals:pending appeals, discretion to accommodate
1. Francis v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
homelessness decisions, judicial review of:appeals:time limits
1. R (Van der Stolk) v Camden LBC
homelessness decisions, judicial review of:costs
1. R v Lambeth LBC ex p Wilson
homelessness decisions, judicial review of:fair hearing, right to a
1. Begum (Runa) v Tower Hamlets LBC
homelessness decisions, judicial review of:fraud, wasted costs orders in absence of
1. R v Lambeth LBC ex p Wilson
homelessness decisions, judicial review of:pending appeals, discretion to accommodate
1. Francis v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
homelessness decisions, judicial review of:refusal to reconsider decisions, remedy for
1. R v Westminster CC ex p Ellioua
homelessness decisions, judicial review of:reviews
1. R v Westminster CC ex p Ellioua
2. Which court?
homelessness decisions, judicial review of:time limits
1. R (Van der Stolk) v Camden LBC
homelessness decisions, judicial review of:use of judicial review, comments on
1. R v Hillingdon LBC ex p Puhlhofer
homelessness decisions, judicial review of:wasted costs orders
1. R v Lambeth LBC ex p Wilson
homelessness decisions, reasons for
1. Reasons
2. South Bucks DC v Porter
3. Bernard v Enfield LBC
4. R v Islington LBC ex p Hinds
5. R v Westminster CC ex p Ermakov
6. R v Islington LBC ex p Okocha
7. R v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p Kassam
8. R v Northampton BC ex p Clarkson
9. R v Wandsworth LBC ex p Dodia
homelessness decisions, reasons for:account of applicants preferred over another, reasons for
1. R v Wandsworth LBC ex p Dodia
homelessness decisions, reasons for:adequacy
1. R v Westminster CC ex p Ermakov
2. R v Islington LBC ex p Okocha
3. R v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p Kassam
4. R v Northampton BC ex p Clarkson
5. R v Wandsworth LBC ex p Dodia
homelessness decisions, reasons for:facts from value judgments, separation of
1. R v Islington LBC ex p Hinds
homelessness decisions, reasons for:material matters, letters failed to address
1. R v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p Kassam
homelessness decisions, reasons for:proper approach
1. South Bucks DC v Porter
homelessness decisions, reasons for:quashed decisions
1. R v Westminster CC ex p Ermakov
2. R v Islington LBC ex p Okocha
3. R v Southwark LBC ex p Dagou
homelessness decisions, reasons for:reasonableness of continued occupation
1. R v Northampton BC ex p Clarkson
homelessness decisions, reasons for:referrals
1. R v Southwark LBC ex p Dagou
homelessness decisions, reasons for:resources, detailed assessment of applicant’s
1. Bernard v Enfield LBC
homelessness decisions, reasons for:reviews
1. Review
2. Akhtar v Birmingham CC
homelessness decisions, reasons for:reviews:adverse decisions
1. Decisions
homelessness decisions, reasons for:reviews:requests
1. Reasons
homelessness decisions, reasons for:reviews:successful, no reasons where
1. Akhtar v Birmingham CC
homelessness decisions, reasons for:successful, no reasons where
1. Akhtar v Birmingham CC
homelessness decisions, reasons for:suitability of property when re-offered after review
1. R v Islington LBC ex p Okocha
homelessness decisions, reasons for:supplemental reasons
1. R v Westminster CC ex p Ermakov
homelessness decisions, reasons for:value judgments from facts, separation of
1. R v Islington LBC ex p Hinds
homelessness decisions, reasons for:writing
1. Reasons
homelessness decisions
1. Decisions
homelessness decisions:changes in law, retrospective application of
1. R v Hackney LBC ex p K
homelessness decisions:deception
1. R v Southwark LBC ex p Dagou
homelessness decisions:delay
1. R v Brent LBC ex p Miyanger
homelessness decisions:flawed decisions
1. R v Beverley BC ex p McPhee
homelessness decisions:fraud
1. R v Dacorum DC ex p Walsh
2. R v Southwark LBC ex p Dagou
homelessness decisions:general principles
1. R v Beverley BC ex p McPhee
2. R v Brent LBC ex p Miyanger
3. R (Hammia) v Wandsworth LBC
homelessness decisions:intentional homelessness
1. Crawley BC v B
homelessness decisions:main housing duty
1. R v Hackney LBC ex p K
2. R v Brent LBC ex p Sadiq
homelessness decisions:mandamus
1. R v Brent LBC ex p Miyanger
homelessness decisions:mistake of fact
1. Porteous v West Dorset DC
homelessness decisions:notice to quit before fleeing from domestic violence, requirement for tenant to serve
1. R (Hammia) v Wandsworth LBC
homelessness decisions:priority need
1. Crawley BC v B
2. R v Brent LBC ex p Sadiq
homelessness decisions:reconsideration
1. Crawley BC v B
2. Porteous v West Dorset DC
3. R v Hackney LBC ex p K
4. R v Brent LBC ex p Sadiq
5. R v Dacorum DC ex p Walsh
homelessness decisions:referrals
1. R v Beverley BC ex p McPhee
homelessness decisions:rescission
1. R v Southwark LBC ex p Dagou
homelessness decisions:retrospectivity
1. R v Hackney LBC ex p K
homelessness decisions:writing
1. Decisions
homelessness enquiries
1. Enquiries
2. Green and Coyne v Croydon LBC
3. Pieretti v Enfield LBC
4. R v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p Bayani
5. R v Sevenoaks DC ex p Reynolds
6. R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Khatun (Shafia)
7. R v Westminster CC ex p Augustin
8. Robinson v Brent LBC
9. Williams v Birmingham CC
10. R v Dacorum BC ex p Brown
11. R v Gravesham BC ex p Winchester
12. R v Hackney LBC ex p Decordova
13. R v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p Silchenstedt
14. R v Lambeth LBC ex p Walters
15. R v Nottingham CC ex p Costello
16. R v Poole BC ex p Cooper
17. R v Sedgemoor DC ex p McCarthy
18. R v Westminster CC ex p Iqbal
19. R v Woodspring DC ex p Walters
20. R v Wyre BC ex p Joyce
21. Odunsi v Brent LBC
homelessness enquiries:abroad, reasonableness of accommodation
1. R v Westminster CC ex p Augustin
homelessness enquiries:adequacy
1. Enquiries
2. R v Dacorum BC ex p Brown
3. R v Westminster CC ex p Iqbal
homelessness enquiries:admissions, opportunity to challenge
1. Robinson v Brent LBC
homelessness enquiries:affordability
1. Odunsi v Brent LBC
homelessness enquiries:believed, where it was not put to applicants that account not
1. R v Hackney LBC ex p Decordova
homelessness enquiries:burden on local authorities
1. R v Woodspring DC ex p Walters
homelessness enquiries:children, no medical examination of
1. R v Lambeth LBC ex p Walters
homelessness enquiries:confidentiality
1. R v Poole BC ex p Cooper
homelessness enquiries:death threats
1. R v Westminster CC ex p Iqbal
homelessness enquiries:disability discrimination
1. Pieretti v Enfield LBC
homelessness enquiries:explain, giving opportunity to
1. R v Wyre BC ex p Joyce
homelessness enquiries:financial circumstances
1. R v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p Bayani
homelessness enquiries:further enquiries
1. R v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p Silchenstedt
homelessness enquiries:interviews
1. R v Sevenoaks DC ex p Reynolds
2. R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Khatun (Shafia)
3. R v Dacorum BC ex p Brown
homelessness enquiries:medical advisers, reliance on opinions of
1. R v Lambeth LBC ex p Walters
homelessness enquiries:medical records
1. R v Lambeth LBC ex p Walters
homelessness enquiries:notes, without taking
1. R v Dacorum BC ex p Brown
homelessness enquiries:possession orders
1. Green and Coyne v Croydon LBC
homelessness enquiries:questioning inhibiting applicants from stating case
1. R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Khatun (Shafia)
homelessness enquiries:reconsideration
1. R v Lambeth LBC ex p Miah
homelessness enquiries:rent:arrears
1. Green and Coyne v Croydon LBC
2. R v Wyre BC ex p Joyce
homelessness enquiries:single men with health problems, inadequate enquiries about
1. Benson v Lewisham LBC
homelessness enquiries:social workers, statements to
1. R v Nottingham CC ex p Costello
homelessness enquiries:suitability of accommodation
1. R v Sedgemoor DC ex p McCarthy
homelessness enquiries:supervisory jurisdiction
1. R v Gravesham BC ex p Winchester
homelessness enquiries:travel
1. Williams v Birmingham CC
homelessness enquiries:vulnerable persons
1. Benson v Lewisham LBC
homelessness reviews
1. Review
homelessness reviews:adverse matters put to applicants
1. Lomotey v Enfield LBC
homelessness reviews:appeals:defective review decisions, series of
1. Ekwuru v Westminster CC
homelessness reviews:appeals:notification of right
1. Review
homelessness reviews:appeals:points of law
1. Appeals
homelessness reviews:appeals:refusal
1. R v Westminster CC ex p Ellioua
homelessness reviews:appeals:withdrawn decisions, on
1. Tower Hamlets LBC v Deugi
homelessness reviews:construction of decisions
1. Abdullah v Westminster CC
2. Abdullah v Westminster CC
homelessness reviews:contracting out review functions
1. De-Winter Heald v Brent LBC
homelessness reviews:defective decisions
1. Rowley v Rugby BC
2. Ekwuru v Westminster CC
homelessness reviews:delay
1. Goodger v Ealing LBC
2. R (C) v Lewisham LBC
homelessness reviews:discretionary power to accommodate, as triggering
1. Rowley v Rugby BC
homelessness reviews:duty discharged, review of decisions that
1. Warsame v Hounslow LBC
homelessness reviews:face to face meetings, right to
1. Makisi v Birmingham CC; Yosief v Birmingham CC; Nagi v Birmingham CC
homelessness reviews:fairness
1. Feld v Barnet LBC; Pour v Westminster CC
2. Goodger v Ealing LBC
homelessness reviews:files, delay in providing copy of housing
1. Goodger v Ealing LBC
homelessness reviews:fraud
1. R v Dacorum DC ex p Walsh
homelessness reviews:general principles
1. Abdullah v Westminster CC
2. De-Winter Heald v Brent LBC
3. Feld v Barnet LBC; Pour v Westminster CC
4. Goodger v Ealing LBC
5. Nzamy v Brent LBC
6. Sahardid v Camden LBC
7. Sareen v Hackney LBC
8. Warsame v Hounslow LBC
9. Abdullah v Westminster CC
homelessness reviews:guidance
1. Ravichandran v Lewisham LBC
homelessness reviews:important issues not addressed adequately, where
1. Hall v Wandsworth LBC; Carter v Wandsworth LBC
homelessness reviews:inconsistency in reasoning
1. Gilby v Westminster CC
homelessness reviews:informed of right
1. Decisions
homelessness reviews:intentional homelessness
1. Gilby v Westminster CC
homelessness reviews:judicial review
1. R v Westminster CC ex p Ellioua
2. Which court?
homelessness reviews:letters read in broad, commonsense way
1. Nzamy v Brent LBC
homelessness reviews:local connection provisions
1. Sareen v Hackney LBC
homelessness reviews:merits of decision when extending time, no consideration of
1. R (Slaiman) v Richmond upon Thames LBC
homelessness reviews:‘minded to’ letters, mandatory obligation to send
1. Lambeth LBC v Johnston
homelessness reviews:mistake of fact
1. Porteous v West Dorset DC
homelessness reviews:notification of right to review
1. Warsame v Hounslow LBC
homelessness reviews:oral hearings
1. Lomotey v Enfield LBC
homelessness reviews:out of time requests
1. R (C) v Lewisham LBC
2. R (Slaiman) v Richmond upon Thames LBC
3. Adams v Southwark LBC
homelessness reviews:pending review, accommodation
1. R v Camden LBC ex p Mohammed
2. R v Newham LBC ex p Lumley
3. R (Abdi) v Lambeth LBC
4. R (Antoine) v Reigate and Banstead DC and First Secretary of State
5. R (Araya) v Leeds CC
6. R (Hassan) v Croydon LBC
7. R (Paul-Coker) v Southwark LBC
homelessness reviews:post and not returned, requests made if sent by ordinary
1. Adams v Southwark LBC
homelessness reviews:procedure
1. Review
homelessness reviews:reasons
1. Reasons
2. Decisions
3. Review
4. Akhtar v Birmingham CC
homelessness reviews:reconsideration of review decisions
1. R v Westminster CC ex p Ellioua
homelessness reviews:refusal to reconsider decisions, remedy for
1. R v Westminster CC ex p Ellioua
homelessness reviews:representations:face to face meetings, right to
1. Makisi v Birmingham CC; Yosief v Birmingham CC; Nagi v Birmingham CC
homelessness reviews:representations:opportunity to make
1. Lambeth LBC v Johnston
homelessness reviews:representations:telephone, by
1. Makisi v Birmingham CC; Yosief v Birmingham CC; Nagi v Birmingham CC
homelessness reviews:same reviewers, second reviews by
1. Feld v Barnet LBC; Pour v Westminster CC
homelessness reviews:second reviews by same reviewers
1. Feld v Barnet LBC; Pour v Westminster CC
homelessness reviews:statutory right
1. Review
homelessness reviews:suitability of offers and reasonable refusal
1. Sahardid v Camden LBC
2. Osseily v Westminster CC
homelessness reviews:telephone, representations by
1. Makisi v Birmingham CC; Yosief v Birmingham CC; Nagi v Birmingham CC
homelessness reviews:time limits
1. R (C) v Lewisham LBC
2. R (Slaiman) v Richmond upon Thames LBC
3. Adams v Southwark LBC
homelessness reviews:withdrawal of decisions
1. Tower Hamlets LBC v Deugi
homelessness reviews:withdrawal of offers
1. Osseily v Westminster CC
hospitals:commencement of possession proceedings
1. Barnet Primary Care Trust v X
hospitals:High Court proceedings
1. Barnet Primary Care Trust v X
hospitals:succession
1. Hedgedale Ltd v Hards
hospitals:temporary absences
1. Hedgedale Ltd v Hards
hostels:exclusive possession
1. Westminster CC v Clarke
hostels:homelessness
1. Rogerson v Wigan MBC
hostels:Protection from Eviction Act 1977
1. Rogerson v Wigan MBC
hostels:separate dwelling, let as a
1. Westminster CC v Clarke
hot water:deficiencies
1. Sarmad v Okello
hot water:loss of or no water
1. Ferguson v Jones
hotels:harassment and illegal eviction, damages for
1. Mehta v Royal Bank of Scotland
hotels:licences
1. Brillouet v Landless
2. Mehta v Royal Bank of Scotland
hotels:licence/tenancy distinction
1. Brillouet v Landless
houseboats:cruise, licence to
1. R v Hillingdon LBC ex p Bax
houseboats:licences
1. R v Hillingdon LBC ex p Bax
houseboats:moorings, without permanent
1. R v Hillingdon LBC ex p Bax
houseboats:part of land, as
1. Mew v Tristmire Limited
households:allocation
1. R (Kimvono) v Tower Hamlets LBC
households:homelessness
1. Priority need
households:ineligible persons
1. R (Kimvono) v Tower Hamlets LBC
Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMOs)
1. Local authority enforcement
housing associations:assured tenancies
1. Assured tenancy transitional provisions
2. Crown Estate Commissioners v Governors of the Peabody Trust
housing associations:Crown Estates Commissioners, transfer of property by
1. Crown Estate Commissioners v Governors of the Peabody Trust
housing associations:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under
1. Ozmus v West Hampstead Housing Association
housing associations:public authorities, as
1. R (Weaver) v London & Quadrant Housing Trust
2. Poplar Housing and Regeneration Community Association Ltd v Donoghue
housing associations:rent arrears
1. R (Weaver) v London & Quadrant Housing Trust
housing associations:security of tenure
1. Poplar Housing and Regeneration Community Association Ltd v Donoghue
housing benefit :applicants did not know whether HB would cover rent, where
1. F v Birmingham CC
housing benefit :belief that HB would cover rent, consideration of
1. R v Westminster CC ex p Obeid
housing benefit :delay, good cause for
1. Tsfayo v UK
housing benefit :disrepair, damages for
1. Wallace v Manchester CC
housing benefit :fair hearing, right to a
1. Tsfayo v UK
housing benefit :homelessness:intentional
1. F v Birmingham CC
2. Gibbons v Bury MBC
3. R v Westminster CC ex p Obeid
housing benefit :Housing Benefit Review Board
1. Tsfayo v UK
housing benefit :ignorance of housing benefit
1. Gibbons v Bury MBC
housing benefit :omissions
1. Tsfayo v UK
housing benefit :oppression
1. Rendham Holdings Ltd v Patel
housing benefit :prisoners, sent to
1. Saint v Barking and Dagenham LBC
housing benefit :shortfall
1. F v Birmingham CC
2. R v Westminster CC ex p Obeid
3. R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Kaur
housing benefit :suitability of accommodation
1. R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Kaur
housing benefit :warrants for possession, setting aside
1. Saint v Barking and Dagenham LBC
2. Rendham Holdings Ltd v Patel
Housing Health and Safety Rating System (HHSRS)
1. Local authority enforcement
Human Rights Act 1998 :repairing covenants
1. Lee v Leeds CC
Human Rights Act 1998 :security of tenure
1. Poplar Housing and Regeneration Community Association Ltd v Donoghue
humanitarian considerations
1. R v Wealden DC ex p Wales; R v Lincolnshire CC ex p Atkinson
identify occupants, injunctions where it is impossible to
1. South Cambridgeshire DC v Gammell; Bromley LBC v Maughan
ignorance of material facts
1. Gibbons v Bury MBC
2. R v Exeter CC ex p Tranckle
3. R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Rouf
4. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Lusi and Lusi
5. R v Mole Valley DC ex p Burton
6. R v Wandsworth LBC ex p Rose
7. R v Westminster CC ex p Obeid
illegitimate children, succession of
1. Sheffield CC v Wall (No 2)
immigration control, persons subject to
1. Eligibility
2. Lekpo-Bozua v Hackney LBC
immoral or illegal purposes, use of dwellings for
1. Anti-social behaviour
2. Abrahams v Wilson
imprisonment :abandonment
1. Kalas v Farmer
imprisonment :children
1. New Charter Housing (North) Ltd v Ashcroft
imprisonment :committal for contempt
1. Saxby v McKinley
imprisonment :harassment and illegal eviction
1. Civil proceedings
imprisonment :injunctions
1. Birmingham CC v Flatt
2. Tower Hamlets LBC v Long
3. Wear Valley DC v Robson
4. Saxby v McKinley
imprisonment :lynch mob behaviour by tenants
1. Tower Hamlets LBC v Long
imprisonment :nuisance and annoyance
1. New Charter Housing (North) Ltd v Ashcroft
imprisonment :settled accommodation and intentional homelessness
1. Stewart v Lambeth LBC
imprisonment :vacate premises, failure to
1. Trustee in Bankruptcy of Canty v Canty
improvements:access to premises
1. Yeomans Row Management Ltd v Bodentien-Meyrick
improvements:covenants
1. Mullaney v Maybourne Grange (Croydon) Management Co Ltd
2. Holding and Management Ltd v Property Holding and Investment Trust plc
improvements:damp-proof courses
1. Eyre v McCracken
improvements:disrepair
1. Eyre v McCracken
2. McDougall v Easington DC
3. Yeomans Row Management Ltd v Bodentien-Meyrick
improvements:notices
1. Local authority enforcement
improvements:rent regulation
1. Rowe v South West Rent Assessment Panel
improvements:repairs/improvements distinction
1. McDougall v Easington DC
2. Mullaney v Maybourne Grange (Croydon) Management Co Ltd
3. Holding and Management Ltd v Property Holding and Investment Trust plc
improvements:service charges and long leases
1. Mullaney v Maybourne Grange (Croydon) Management Co Ltd
2. Holding and Management Ltd v Property Holding and Investment Trust plc
in the locality, definition of
1. Manchester CC v Lawler
income support
1. R v Shrewsbury and Atcham BC ex p Griffiths
inconvenience and discomfort, damages for
1. Damages
infestation:mice infestation
1. London & Quadrant Housing Trust v Riemy
inflation
1. Damages
informal arrangements
1. The distinction between tenancies and licences – informal arrangements
2. Errington v Errington and Woods
3. Marcroft Wagons Ltd v Smith
4. Meynell Family Properties Ltd v Meynell
5. Nunn v Dalrymple
6. Sharp v McArthur
7. Vaughan-Armatrading v Sarsah
8. Ward v Warnke
9. Royal Philanthropic Society v County
inherent defects
1. Stent v Monmouth DC
2. Targett v Torfaen BC
inhuman or degrading treatment :Gypsies and Travellers
1. R (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset Police
inhuman or degrading treatment :interim possession orders
1. R (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset Police
injunctions:American Cyanamid principles
1. Love v Herrity
injunctions:balance of convenience
1. Injunctions against landlords
injunctions:children
1. Bater v Bater; Bater v Greenwich LBC
2. Hooton v Liverpool CC
injunctions:committal for contempt 06
1. Howes v Howes
2. O’Neill v Murray
3. Parsons v Nasar
4. Saxby v McKinley
injunctions:curfew
1. Murray v Chief Constable of Lancashire
injunctions:damages, inadequacy of
1. Injunctions against landlords
injunctions:disposal of other property owned by tenants, prevention of
1. Fennbend Ltd v Millar
injunctions:disrepair
1. R v Wandsworth County Court ex p Munn
2. Interim injunctions
3. Redland Bricks Ltd v Morris
4. Parker v Camden LBC
5. Hooton v Liverpool CC
6. Sheriden v Broadbridge
injunctions:exceptional circumstances
1. Parker v Camden LBC
injunctions:general principles
1. Redland Bricks Ltd v Morris
injunctions:harassment and illegal eviction
1. Injunctions against landlords
2. Lewis v Lewis
3. Love v Herrity
4. Parsons v Nasar
5. Patel v W H Smith (Eziot) Ltd
injunctions:identify occupants, where impossible to
1. South Cambridgeshire DC v Gammell; Bromley LBC v Maughan
injunctions:imprisonment for breach
1. Saxby v McKinley
injunctions:interim injunctions
1. Injunctions against landlords
injunctions:interlocutory injunctions and disrepair
1. Redland Bricks Ltd v Morris
2. Parker v Camden LBC
3. Hooton v Liverpool CC
injunctions:joint tenants
1. Bater v Bater; Bater v Greenwich LBC
injunctions:mandatory injunctions
1. R v Wandsworth County Court ex p Munn
2. Redland Bricks Ltd v Morris
3. Parker v Camden LBC
injunctions:Matrimonial Causes Act1973
1. Bater v Bater; Bater v Greenwich LBC
injunctions:named, no requirement for trespassers to be
1. Hampshire Waste Services Ltd v Persons Unknown
injunctions:notice to quit
1. Bater v Bater; Bater v Greenwich LBC
injunctions:nuisance and annoyance
1. Canterbury CC v Lowe
injunctions:penal notices, endorsement of
1. R v Wandsworth County Court ex p Munn
injunctions:private and family life and home, right to respect for
1. Horie v UK
injunctions:protestors
1. Hampshire Waste Services Ltd v Persons Unknown
injunctions:re-let premises, where landlord had
1. Love v Herrity
2. Parsons v Nasar
injunctions:readmit tenants, injunctions must clearly set out what landlord must do to
1. Parsons v Nasar
injunctions:retrospective dispensation with service
1. Lewis v Lewis
injunctions:security of tenure
1. Manchester CC v Lawler
2. Injunctions against tenants and third parties
3. Accent Foundation Ltd v Lee
4. Caradon DC v Paton
5. Manchester CC v Lee
6. Moat Housing Group South Ltd v Harris and Hartless
7. Nottingham CC v Zain (a minor)
8. Southwark LBC v Storrie
9. Hillingdon LBC v Vijayatunga
10. Sandwell MBC v Preece
injunctions:serious disrepair
1. Hooton v Liverpool CC
injunctions:serious issue to be tried
1. Injunctions against landlords
injunctions:service, retrospective dispensation of
1. Lewis v Lewis
injunctions:staircases in danger of collapse
1. Sheriden v Broadbridge
injunctions:suitability of accommodation
1. Fennbend Ltd v Millar
2. R (Khan) v Newham LBC
injunctions:trespassers
1. Horie v UK
2. South Cambridgeshire DC v Gammell; Bromley LBC v Maughan
3. Hampshire Waste Services Ltd v Persons Unknown
4. Patel v W H Smith (Eziot) Ltd
injunctions:unknown persons
1. South Cambridgeshire DC v Gammell; Bromley LBC v Maughan
2. Hampshire Waste Services Ltd v Persons Unknown
injunctions:urgent cases
1. Interim injunctions
injunctions against tenants
1. Manchester CC v Lawler
2. Injunctions against tenants and third parties
3. Accent Foundation Ltd v Lee
4. Caradon DC v Paton
5. Manchester CC v Lee
6. Moat Housing Group South Ltd v Harris and Hartless
7. Nottingham CC v Zain (a minor)
8. Southwark LBC v Storrie
9. Hillingdon LBC v Vijayatunga
10. Sandwell MBC v Preece
injunctions against tenants: breach:committal
1. R (James) v HM Prison Birmingham and others
injunctions against tenants:adjournment of committal proceedings
1. Stafford BC v Haynes
injunctions against tenants:admissions
1. Barnet LBC v Hurst
2. Stafford BC v Haynes
injunctions against tenants:anti-social behaviour
1. Injunctions against tenants and third parties
2. Moat Housing Group South Ltd v Harris and Hartless
3. Swan Housing Association Ltd v Gill
4. Sandwell MBC v Preece
injunctions against tenants:appeals
1. Medina Housing Association v Connolly
injunctions against tenants:breach
1. Islington LBC v Doey
injunctions against tenants:breach:committal
1. Injunctions against tenants and third parties
2. Barnet LBC v Hurst
3. Birmingham CC v Flatt
4. Gill v Birmingham City Council
5. Leicester CC v Lewis
6. Longhurst Homes Ltd v Killen
7. Manchester CC v McCann
8. Manchester CC v Worthington
9. Medina Housing Association v Connolly
10. Middlesbrough BC v Turnbull
11. Nottingham CC v Cutts
12. Stafford BC v Haynes
13. Tower Hamlets LBC v Long
14. Wear Valley DC v Robson
injunctions against tenants:breach:day of trial, actions on
1. South Glamorgan CC v Griffiths
injunctions against tenants:breach:harassment
1. Gill v Birmingham City Council
injunctions against tenants:breach:preparation time
1. Manchester CC v Worthington
injunctions against tenants:breach:sentencing
1. Tower Hamlets LBC v Long
injunctions against tenants:breach:written particulars of breaches
1. Manchester CC v Worthington
injunctions against tenants:business use, covenant against
1. Caradon DC v Paton
injunctions against tenants:children
1. Harrow LBC v G
injunctions against tenants:committal
1. Injunctions against tenants and third parties
2. Barnet LBC v Hurst
3. Birmingham CC v Flatt
4. Hillingdon LBC v Vijayatunga
5. Leicester CC v Lewis
6. Longhurst Homes Ltd v Killen
7. Manchester CC v McCann
8. Manchester CC v Worthington
9. Medina Housing Association v Connolly
10. Middlesbrough BC v Turnbull
11. Nottingham CC v Cutts
12. R (James) v HM Prison Birmingham and others
13. Stafford BC v Haynes
14. Tower Hamlets LBC v Long
15. Wear Valley DC v Robson
injunctions against tenants:contempt of court
1. Injunctions against tenants and third parties
2. Barnet LBC v Hurst
3. Birmingham CC v Flatt
4. Leicester CC v Lewis
5. Longhurst Homes Ltd v Killen
6. Manchester CC v McCann
7. Manchester CC v Worthington
8. Medina Housing Association v Connolly
9. Middlesbrough BC v Turnbull
10. Nottingham CC v Cutts
11. Stafford BC v Haynes
12. Tower Hamlets LBC v Long
13. Wear Valley DC v Robson
injunctions against tenants:covenants
1. Caradon DC v Paton
2. Hampstead and Suburban Properties v Diomedous
injunctions against tenants:custodial sentences
1. Birmingham CC v Flatt
2. Tower Hamlets LBC v Long
3. Wear Valley DC v Robson
injunctions against tenants:damages, discharge of injunctions and
1. Southwark LBC v Storrie
injunctions against tenants:day of trial, breach by actions on
1. South Glamorgan CC v Griffiths
injunctions against tenants:disability discrimination
1. Swan Housing Association Ltd v Gill
injunctions against tenants:dogs, keeping
1. Sutton Housing Trust v Lawrence
injunctions against tenants:enforcement
1. Harrow LBC v G
injunctions against tenants:gang injunctions
1. Murray v Chief Constable of Lancashire
2. R (James) v HM Prison Birmingham and others
injunctions against tenants:guidance
1. Moat Housing Group South Ltd v Harris and Hartless
injunctions against tenants:hearsay evidence
1. Moat Housing Group South Ltd v Harris and Hartless
2. Wear Valley DC v Robson
injunctions against tenants:holiday lettings
1. Caradon DC v Paton
injunctions against tenants:housing-related conduct, meaning of
1. Swindon BC v Redpath
injunctions against tenants:imprisonment
1. Islington LBC v Doey
injunctions against tenants:in the locality
1. Manchester CC v Lawler
2. Manchester CC v Lee
injunctions against tenants:interim injunctions
1. Hampstead and Suburban Properties v Diomedous
2. Medina Housing Association v Connolly
injunctions against tenants:lynch mob behaviour
1. Tower Hamlets LBC v Long
injunctions against tenants:manifest unfairness
1. Nottingham CC v Cutts
injunctions against tenants:maximum sentences for worst cases
1. Middlesbrough BC v Turnbull
injunctions against tenants:notice
1. Moat Housing Group South Ltd v Harris and Hartless
2. Southwark LBC v Storrie
3. Middlesbrough BC v Turnbull
injunctions against tenants:nuisance
1. Manchester CC v Lee
2. Nottingham CC v Zain (a minor)
3. Islington LBC v Doey
injunctions against tenants:ouster injunctions, breach of
1. Leicester CC v Lewis
injunctions against tenants:possession claims
1. Injunctions against tenants and third parties
injunctions against tenants:preparation time
1. Manchester CC v Worthington
injunctions against tenants:procedural defects
1. Hillingdon LBC v Vijayatunga
2. Medina Housing Association v Connolly
injunctions against tenants:public nuisance
1. Nottingham CC v Zain (a minor)
injunctions against tenants:sentencing:contempt of court
1. Barnet LBC v Hurst
2. Longhurst Homes Ltd v Killen
3. Middlesbrough BC v Turnbull
4. Nottingham CC v Cutts
5. Sandwell MBC v Preece
injunctions against tenants:sentencing:custodial sentences
1. Birmingham CC v Flatt
2. Tower Hamlets LBC v Long
3. Wear Valley DC v Robson
injunctions against tenants:sentencing:hearsay
1. Wear Valley DC v Robson
injunctions against tenants:sentencing:length
1. Barnet LBC v Hurst
injunctions against tenants:sentencing:limited admissions
1. Barnet LBC v Hurst
injunctions against tenants:sentencing:lynch mob behaviour
1. Tower Hamlets LBC v Long
injunctions against tenants:sentencing:manifest unfairness
1. Nottingham CC v Cutts
injunctions against tenants:sentencing:ouster injunctions, breach of
1. Leicester CC v Lewis
injunctions against tenants:sentencing:suspended sentence, activation of
1. Sandwell MBC v Preece
injunctions against tenants:sentencing:terrorised, where neighbours are
1. Wear Valley DC v Robson
injunctions against tenants:sentencing:totality, principle of
1. Sandwell MBC v Preece
injunctions against tenants:sentencing:violence
1. Longhurst Homes Ltd v Killen
injunctions against tenants:sentencing:worst cases, maximum sentences for
1. Middlesbrough BC v Turnbull
injunctions against tenants:shopping centres
1. Manchester CC v Lawler
injunctions against tenants:suspended sentences, activation of
1. Sandwell MBC v Preece
injunctions against tenants:technical nature, procedural defects of a
1. Hillingdon LBC v Vijayatunga
injunctions against tenants:terrorised, where neighbours are
1. Wear Valley DC v Robson
injunctions against tenants:threats to kill
1. Nottingham CC v Cutts
injunctions against tenants:totality in sentencing, principle of
1. Sandwell MBC v Preece
injunctions against tenants:violence, sentencing where no
1. Longhurst Homes Ltd v Killen
injunctions against tenants:waiver
1. Accent Foundation Ltd v Lee
injunctions against tenants:witnesses, wilful insults to
1. Manchester CC v McCann
injunctions against tenants:worst cases, maximum sentences for
1. Middlesbrough BC v Turnbull
injunctions against tenants:written particulars of breaches
1. Manchester CC v Worthington
inspections
1. Morley v Knowsley BC
2. Clarke v Taff Ely BC
insurance
1. Woolwich Building Society v Brown
intentional homelessness
1. Intentional homelessness
2. Reasonable to continue to occupy
intentional homelessness:abroad:bringing family from
1. Din v Wandsworth LBC
intentional homelessness:acquiescence
1. Intentional homelessness
2. Griffiths v St Helens MBC
3. R v Nottingham CC ex p Caine
4. R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Khatun (Asma)
5. R v Eastleigh BC ex p Beattie (No 2)
6. R v North Devon DC ex p Lewis
7. R v Penwith DC ex p Trevena
8. R v Swansea CC ex p John
9. R v West Dorset DC ex p Phillips
intentional homelessness:adverse material to applicants, putting
1. Hobbs v Sutton LBC
intentional homelessness:advice and assistance
1. R (Nipyo) v Croydon LBC
intentional homelessness:appeals
1. Ekwuru v Westminster CC
intentional homelessness:available, meaning of
1. Available
intentional homelessness:blundering/carelessness and dishonesty, difference between
1. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Lusi and Lusi
intentional homelessness:business mortgage default
1. R v Wandsworth LBC ex p Onwudiwe
intentional homelessness:business ventures, prospects of
1. R v Exeter CC ex p Tranckle
intentional homelessness:causation
1. Causation and settled accommodation
2. Bratton v Croydon LBC
3. Denton v Southwark LBC
4. Dyson v Kerrier DC
5. Knight v Vale Royal BC
6. Minchin v Sheffield CC
7. Mohamed v Westminster CC
8. R v Gloucester CC ex p Miles
9. Steward v Kingston upon Thames RLBC
10. Stewart v Lambeth LBC
11. Watchman v Ipswich BC
12. R v Basingstoke and Deane BC ex p Bassett
13. R v Croydon LBC ex p Easom
14. R v Hackney LBC ex p Ajayi
15. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p P
16. R v Hounslow LBC ex p R
17. R v Merton LBC ex p Ruffle
18. R v Newham LBC ex p Campbell
19. R v Shrewsbury and Atcham BC ex p Griffiths
20. R v Westminster CC ex p Reid
21. R v Kyle and Carrick DC ex p Robson
intentional homelessness:ceasing to occupy accommodation
1. Cease to occupy accommodation
2. Lee-Lawrence v Penwith DC
3. R v Wandsworth LBC ex p Oteng
4. R v Westminster CC ex p De Souza
5. R v Westminster CC ex p Khan
intentional homelessness:collusion
1. Intentional homelessness
intentional homelessness:continued occupation, reasonableness of
1. Reasonable to continue to occupy: s175(3)
2. Noh v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
3. R v Brent LBC ex p Yusuf
4. Reasonable to continue to occupy
intentional homelessness:date:last period of settled accommodation
1. Din v Wandsworth LBC
intentional homelessness:date:left, when accommodation is
1. Din v Wandsworth LBC
intentional homelessness:date:material
1. Din v Wandsworth LBC
intentional homelessness:definition of intentional homelessness
1. Intentional homelessness
intentional homelessness:deliberate acts or omissions
1. Deliberate act or omission
intentional homelessness:discharge of duty
1. R (Conville) v Richmond upon Thames LBC
2. R (Nipyo) v Croydon LBC
intentional homelessness:duration of accommodation
1. R (Conville) v Richmond upon Thames LBC
intentional homelessness:employment with accommodation, loss of
1. R v Winchester CC ex p Ashton
intentional homelessness:evidence
1. R v Eastleigh BC ex p Beattie (No 2)
2. R v Swansea CC ex p John
3. R v West Dorset DC ex p Phillips
intentional homelessness:false statements
1. Rushcliffe BC v Watson
2. Shrewsbury and Atcham BC v Evans
intentional homelessness:families from abroad, bringing
1. R v Hillingdon LBC ex p Islam
intentional homelessness:fraud
1. R v Barnet LBC ex p Rughooputh
intentional homelessness:good faith
1. Deliberate act or omission
2. Aw-Aden v Birmingham CC
3. F v Birmingham CC
4. Gibbons v Bury MBC
5. Hobbs v Sutton LBC
6. O’Connor v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
7. R v Barnet LBC ex p Rughooputh
8. R v Exeter CC ex p Tranckle
9. R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Rouf
10. R v Wandsworth LBC ex p Onwudiwe
11. R v Winchester CC ex p Ashton
12. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Lusi and Lusi
13. R v Mole Valley DC ex p Burton
14. R v Wandsworth LBC ex p Rose
15. R v Westminster CC ex p Obeid
intentional homelessness:honest blundering
1. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Lusi and Lusi
intentional homelessness:housing benefit
1. F v Birmingham CC
2. Gibbons v Bury MBC
3. R v Westminster CC ex p Obeid
intentional homelessness:ignorance of material facts
1. Gibbons v Bury MBC
2. R v Exeter CC ex p Tranckle
3. R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Rouf
4. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Lusi and Lusi
5. R v Mole Valley DC ex p Burton
6. R v Wandsworth LBC ex p Rose
7. R v Westminster CC ex p Obeid
intentional homelessness:inconsistency in reasoning
1. Gilby v Westminster CC
intentional homelessness:interests in property never occupied by applicant, disposal of
1. R v Westminster CC ex p De Souza
intentional homelessness:knowledge of risk
1. R v Wandsworth LBC ex p Onwudiwe
intentional homelessness:left, when accommodation is
1. Din v Wandsworth LBC
intentional homelessness:manage affairs, applicants capacity to
1. Hijazi v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
2. R v Wirral MBC ex p Bell
intentional homelessness:material date
1. Din v Wandsworth LBC
intentional homelessness:medical evidence on capacity
1. Hijazi v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
intentional homelessness:mortgages:business mortgage default
1. R v Wandsworth LBC ex p Onwudiwe
intentional homelessness:mortgages:failure to pay instalments
1. William v Wandsworth LBC; Bellamy v Hounslow LBC
intentional homelessness:mortgages:fraud
1. R v Barnet LBC ex p Rughooputh
intentional homelessness:mortgages:remortgage to pay instalments, failure to use money from
1. William v Wandsworth LBC; Bellamy v Hounslow LBC
intentional homelessness:never lived in property, where applicants
1. R v Westminster CC ex p Khan
intentional homelessness:never to have moved in, where applicants claim
1. Lee-Lawrence v Penwith DC
intentional homelessness:no real prospect of finding intentionality
1. Ekwuru v Westminster CC
intentional homelessness:nuisance
1. Griffiths v St Helens MBC
2. R v Swansea CC ex p John
intentional homelessness:omissions
1. Deliberate act or omission
intentional homelessness:parents, ignorance of unsatisfactory nature of accommodation with
1. R v Wandsworth LBC ex p Rose
intentional homelessness:personal circumstances
1. Noh v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
intentional homelessness:pregnant women living property unsuitable for babies
1. R v Brent LBC ex p Yusuf
intentional homelessness:priority need
1. Crawley BC v B
intentional homelessness:psychiatric evidence
1. Noh v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
intentional homelessness:reasonableness
1. R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Rouf
2. Reasonable to continue to occupy
intentional homelessness:reconciliation with partner after termination of tenancies
1. R v Penwith DC ex p Trevena
intentional homelessness:refusal of offers
1. Cease to occupy accommodation
intentional homelessness:rehousing, inaccurate assurances of
1. R v Mole Valley DC ex p Burton
intentional homelessness:remortgage, failure to use money from
1. William v Wandsworth LBC; Bellamy v Hounslow LBC
intentional homelessness:rent
1. R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Khatun (Asma)
intentional homelessness:resources, regard to
1. R (Conville) v Richmond upon Thames LBC
intentional homelessness:reviews
1. Gilby v Westminster CC
intentional homelessness:sale, ceasing to occupy before
1. R v Wandsworth LBC ex p Oteng
intentional homelessness:settled accommodation
1. Intentional homelessness
2. Din v Wandsworth LBC
3. R v Brent LBC ex p Awua
4. Causation and settled accommodation
5. Bratton v Croydon LBC
6. Denton v Southwark LBC
7. Dyson v Kerrier DC
8. Knight v Vale Royal BC
9. Minchin v Sheffield CC
10. Mohamed v Westminster CC
11. R v Gloucester CC ex p Miles
12. Steward v Kingston upon Thames RLBC
13. Stewart v Lambeth LBC
14. Watchman v Ipswich BC
15. R v Basingstoke and Deane BC ex p Bassett
16. R v Croydon LBC ex p Easom
17. R v Hackney LBC ex p Ajayi
18. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p P
19. R v Hounslow LBC ex p R
20. R v Merton LBC ex p Ruffle
21. R v Newham LBC ex p Campbell
22. R v Shrewsbury and Atcham BC ex p Griffiths
23. R v Westminster CC ex p Reid
24. R v Kyle and Carrick DC ex p Robson
intentional homelessness:spouses:decisions to other spouses, leaving
1. R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Khatun (Asma)
intentional homelessness:spouses:reconciliation with partner after termination of tenancies
1. R v Penwith DC ex p Trevena
intentional homelessness:test
1. Deliberate act or omission
intentional homelessness:vulnerable persons’ capacity to manage own affairs
1. Hijazi v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
2. R v Wirral MBC ex p Bell
intentional homelessness:without accommodation, bringing family from abroad
1. R v Hillingdon LBC ex p Islam
intentional homelessness:work in UK, prospects of finding
1. Aw-Aden v Birmingham CC
interest:claims
1. Bristol and West plc v Bartlett
2. Scottish Equitable v Thompson
interest:rates
1. Rahman v Sterling Credit Ltd
2. Consumer Credit Act 1974
3. Paragon Finance Ltd v Nash; Paragon Finance plc v Staunton
4. Cedar Holdings v Jenkins
interest:service charges and long leases
1. Boldmark Ltd v Cohen
interim accommodation duties and powers for homeless:blanket same day policies
1. R (Khazai) v Birmingham CC
interim accommodation duties and powers for homeless:local connection and referral
1. Mohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
interim accommodation duties and powers for homeless:pending appeals, discretion to accommodate
1. Brookes v Croydon LBC
2. Francis v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
3. Lewis v Havering LBC
4. R v Brighton and Hove Council ex p Nacion
interim accommodation duties and powers for homeless:pending decisions, duty to accommodate
1. Mohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
interim accommodation duties and powers for homeless:pending reviews, discretion to accommodate
1. Mohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
2. R v Camden LBC ex p Mohammed
3. R v Newham LBC ex p Lumley
4. R (Abdi) v Lambeth LBC
5. R (Antoine) v Reigate and Banstead DC and First Secretary of State
6. R (Araya) v Leeds CC
7. R (Hassan) v Croydon LBC
8. R (Paul-Coker) v Southwark LBC
interim accommodation duties and powers for homeless:suitability of accommodation
1. R (Flash) v Southwark LBC
interim accommodation duties and powers for homeless:system failures
1. R (Anonymous) v Southwark LBC
2. R (Kelly) v Birmingham CC
interim possession orders
1. Interim possession orders and removal directions
2. Metropolitan Housing Trust v Ali and Persons Unknown
3. R v Wealden DC ex p Wales; R v Lincolnshire CC ex p Atkinson
4. R v Wolverhampton MBC ex p Dunne
5. R (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset Police
6. Shropshire CC v Wynne
7. Ward v Hillingdon LBC
interim possession orders:asked to leave, notice invalid where travellers not first
1. R (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset Police
interim possession orders:Civil Procedure Rules
1. Interim possession orders and removal directions
interim possession orders:conditions satisfied, no discretion where
1. Metropolitan Housing Trust v Ali and Persons Unknown
interim possession orders:criminal offences
1. Interim possession orders and removal directions
interim possession orders:directions for removal
1. R v Wealden DC ex p Wales; R v Lincolnshire CC ex p Atkinson
interim possession orders:discretion
1. Metropolitan Housing Trust v Ali and Persons Unknown
2. Shropshire CC v Wynne
interim possession orders:fair hearing, right to a
1. R (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset Police
interim possession orders:formalities, not merits, consideration of
1. R v Wolverhampton MBC ex p Dunne
interim possession orders:Gypsies and Travellers:asked to leave, notice invalid where travellers not first
1. R (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset Police
interim possession orders:Gypsies and Travellers:directions for removal
1. R v Wealden DC ex p Wales; R v Lincolnshire CC ex p Atkinson
interim possession orders:Gypsies and Travellers:fair hearing, right to a
1. R (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset Police
interim possession orders:Gypsies and Travellers:formalities, not merits, consideration of
1. R v Wolverhampton MBC ex p Dunne
interim possession orders:Gypsies and Travellers:humanitarian and statutory considerations
1. R v Wealden DC ex p Wales; R v Lincolnshire CC ex p Atkinson
interim possession orders:Gypsies and Travellers:inhuman or degrading treatment
1. R (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset Police
interim possession orders:Gypsies and Travellers:personal circumstances after making orders, enquiries into
1. R v Wolverhampton MBC ex p Dunne
interim possession orders:Gypsies and Travellers:private and family life and home, right to respect for
1. R (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset Police
2. Ward v Hillingdon LBC
interim possession orders:Gypsies and Travellers:review decisions, no discretion to
1. Shropshire CC v Wynne
interim possession orders:humanitarian considerations
1. R v Wealden DC ex p Wales; R v Lincolnshire CC ex p Atkinson
interim possession orders:inhuman or degrading treatment
1. R (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset Police
interim possession orders:personal circumstances after making orders, enquiries into
1. R v Wolverhampton MBC ex p Dunne
interim possession orders:private and family life and home, right to respect for
1. R (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset Police
2. Ward v Hillingdon LBC
interim possession orders:removal directions
1. Ward v Hillingdon LBC
interim possession orders:review decisions, no discretion to
1. Shropshire CC v Wynne
interim possession orders:statutory considerations
1. R v Wealden DC ex p Wales; R v Lincolnshire CC ex p Atkinson
interim possession orders:trespassers
1. Introduction
intermittent and temporary occupation
1. Davies v Peterson
internally displaced persons, delay in eviction of
1. Mirzayev v Azerbaijan
interviews:necessity
1. R v Sevenoaks DC ex p Reynolds
interviews:notes, without taking
1. R v Dacorum BC ex p Brown
interviews:questioning inhibiting applicants from stating case
1. R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Khatun (Shafia)
interviews:sympathetically, to be conducted
1. R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Khatun (Shafia)
introductory tenancies
1. Introductory tenancies
2. Cardiff CC v Stone
3. Salford CC v Garner
4. R (Chowdhury) v Newham LBC
5. R (Forbes) v Lambeth LBC
6. R (Laporte) v Newham LBC
7. R (McDonagh) v Salisbury DC
introductory tenancies:additional grounds for reviews
1. R (Laporte) v Newham LBC
introductory tenancies:assured tenancies
1. Introductory tenancies
introductory tenancies:claim forms, issue of
1. Salford CC v Garner
introductory tenancies:commencement of proceedings
1. Salford CC v Garner
introductory tenancies:conditions, breach of
1. Cardiff CC v Stone
introductory tenancies:hearings, validity of
1. R (McDonagh) v Salisbury DC
introductory tenancies:keys handed over, tenancies started when
1. Salford CC v Garner
introductory tenancies:licences
1. Introductory tenancies
introductory tenancies:notice
1. Cardiff CC v Stone
2. R (Laporte) v Newham LBC
introductory tenancies:nullity, reviews as not being a
1. R (McDonagh) v Salisbury DC
introductory tenancies:possession proceedings, continuance of
1. R (McDonagh) v Salisbury DC
introductory tenancies:probationary tenancies, are
1. Introductory tenancies
introductory tenancies:reasons, change of
1. R (Forbes) v Lambeth LBC
introductory tenancies:registered social landlords, tenants of
1. Introductory tenancies
introductory tenancies:reviews
1. Cardiff CC v Stone
2. R (Forbes) v Lambeth LBC
3. R (Laporte) v Newham LBC
4. R (McDonagh) v Salisbury DC
introductory tenancies:second notices
1. Cardiff CC v Stone
introductory tenancies:secure tenancies
1. Introductory tenancies
introductory tenancies:security of tenure
1. Introductory tenancies
introductory tenancies:service
1. R (Laporte) v Newham LBC
introductory tenancies:trial period, duration of
1. Introductory tenancies
introductory tenancies:unsuitable, councils entitled to make judgments that tenants
1. R (Chowdhury) v Newham LBC
invitation to treat
1. Battersea Churches Housing Trust v Hunte
irrationality
1. R (Maali) v Lambeth LBC
isolated accommodation
1. Kacar v Enfield LBC
Joint tenants: residence requirement
1. Solihull MBC v Hickin
joint tenants:assignment
1. Burton v Camden LBC
joint tenants:breach of trust
1. Greenwich LBC v McGrady
joint tenants:disrepair, damages for
1. O’Beirne v Lambeth LBC
joint tenants:excluding other tenants, orders
1. Harrow LBC v Johnstone
joint tenants:injunctions
1. Bater v Bater; Bater v Greenwich LBC
joint tenants:landlord condition
1. R v Plymouth CC and Cornwall CC ex p Freeman
joint tenants:licence/tenancy distinction
1. AG Securities v Vaughan
2. Antoniades v Villiers and Bridger
joint tenants:notice to quit
1. Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Monk
2. Harrow LBC v Johnstone
joint tenants:notice to quit:breach of trust
1. Greenwich LBC v McGrady
joint tenants:notice to quit:excluding other tenants, orders
1. Harrow LBC v Johnstone
joint tenants:notice to quit:injunctions
1. Bater v Bater; Bater v Greenwich LBC
joint tenants:notice to quit:service
1. Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Monk
2. Greenwich LBC v McGrady
3. Notting Hill Housing Trust v Brackley
joint tenants:notice to quit:termination of tenancies
1. Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Monk
2. Harrow LBC v Johnstone
joint tenants:notice to quit:trusts for sale, breach of
1. Greenwich LBC v McGrady
joint tenants:notice to quit:waiver clauses
1. Notting Hill Housing Trust v Brackley
joint tenants:part tenancies, transfer of
1. Gay v Sheeran
joint tenants:service of notice to quit
1. Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Monk
2. Greenwich LBC v McGrady
3. Notting Hill Housing Trust v Brackley
joint tenants:subtenancies
1. Gay v Sheeran
joint tenants:succession
1. Bassetlaw DC v Renshaw
joint tenants:surrender
1. Leek and Moorlands Building Society v Clark
joint tenants:survivorship
1. Tennant v Hutton
joint tenants:termination of tenancies
1. Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Monk
2. Harrow LBC v Johnstone
joint tenants:transfers
1. Gay v Sheeran
joint tenants:trusts for sale, breach of
1. Greenwich LBC v McGrady
joint tenants:waiver clauses
1. Notting Hill Housing Trust v Brackley
judicial review:allocation
1. General
judicial review:eviction decisions
1. Administrative law and human rights defences
judicial review:fair hearing, right to a
1. Tsfayo v UK
judicial review:omissions
1. Tsfayo v UK
judicial review:public health and environmental protection
1. R v Mansfield DC ex p Ashfield Nominees
keys:commencement of tenancies when keys handed over
1. Salford CC v Garner
keys:exclusive possession
1. Aslan v Murphy (No 1)
keys:key-holders as not being secure tenants
1. Brent LBC v Charles
keys:surrender by handing over keys
1. Bolnore Properties Ltd v Cobb
2. Laine v Cadwallader
3. Proudreed Ltd v Microgen Holdings plc
4. Zionmor v Islington LBC
keys:wrecked room as not being reinstatement, offer of keys to
1. Tagro v Cafane and Patel
kitchens:toilets next to kitchens
1. Birmingham CC v Oakley
knowledge:Defective Premises Act 1972
1. Morley v Knowsley BC
2. Clarke v Taff Ely BC
knowledge:disrepair
1. Notice and delay in carrying out repairs
2. O’Brien v Robinson
3. Dinefwr BC v Jones
4. Stockley v Knowsley MBC
knowledge:frozen pipes
1. Stockley v Knowsley MBC
knowledge:inspections
1. Morley v Knowsley BC
knowledge:intentional homelessness
1. R v Wandsworth LBC ex p Onwudiwe
labels and licence/tenancy distinction
1. Eastleigh BC v Walsh
2. Family Housing Association v Jones
lagging pipes
1. Wycombe Area Health Authority v Barnett
landlord condition:change of landlord
1. Knowles Housing Association v Millar
landlord condition:fully mutual co-operative tenancies
1. Ali Bhai and Cabare v Black Roof CHA Ltd
landlord condition:joint tenancies
1. R v Plymouth CC and Cornwall CC ex p Freeman
landlord condition:Scotland
1. Knowles Housing Association v Millar
landlord condition:secure tenancies
1. Ali Bhai and Cabare v Black Roof CHA Ltd
2. Banjo v Brent LBC
3. Knowles Housing Association v Millar
landlord condition:security of tenure
1. The landlord condition
2. Ali Bhai and Cabare v Black Roof CHA Ltd
3. Banjo v Brent LBC
4. R v Plymouth CC and Cornwall CC ex p Freeman
5. Knowles Housing Association v Millar
landlord condition:will, tenancies at
1. Banjo v Brent LBC
landlords:character
1. Bruton v London and Quadrant Housing Trust
landlords:definition
1. Housing Act 1988 ss27 and 28
2. Francis v Brown
3. Jones v Miah
landlords:landlord condition
1. Ali Bhai and Cabare v Black Roof CHA Ltd
2. Banjo v Brent LBC
3. R v Plymouth CC and Cornwall CC ex p Freeman
4. Knowles Housing Association v Millar
landlords:resident landlord
1. Resident landlords (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 10 and Rent Act 1977 s12)
2. Bardrick v Haycock
3. Barnes v Goresuch
4. Cooper v Tait
5. Griffiths v English
6. Jackson v Pekic
7. Lewis-Graham v Conacher
8. O’Sullivan v Barnett
9. Palmer v McNamara
10. Wolff v Waddington
landlords or members of family, premises required for
1. Premises required for landlord or member of family (Rent Act 1977 Sch 15 Case 9)
2. Alexander v Mohamadzadeh
3. Amaddio v Dalton
4. Baker v MacIver
5. Bassett v Fraser
6. Bostock v Tacher de la Pagerie
7. Coombes v Parry
8. Evans v Engelson
9. Ghelani v Bowie
10. Hodges v Blee
11. Kidder v Birch
12. Manaton v Edwards
13. Mansukhani v Sharkey
landlords or members of family, premises required for:alternative accommodation
1. Alexander v Mohamadzadeh
2. Baker v MacIver
3. Bassett v Fraser
4. Coombes v Parry
landlords or members of family, premises required for:burden of proof
1. Hodges v Blee
landlords or members of family, premises required for:companies owned by landlords, property acquired from
1. Evans v Engelson
landlords or members of family, premises required for:compensation for former tenants after sale
1. Clements v Simmonds
landlords or members of family, premises required for:evidence of attempts to find other accommodation
1. Alexander v Mohamadzadeh
landlords or members of family, premises required for:future, need for accommodation in ascertainable
1. Kidder v Birch
landlords or members of family, premises required for:gifts, landlords who have received property as
1. Mansukhani v Sharkey
landlords or members of family, premises required for:grounds for possession
1. Premises required for landlord or member of family (Rent Act 1977 Sch 15 Case 9)
2. Alexander v Mohamadzadeh
3. Amaddio v Dalton
4. Baker v MacIver
5. Bassett v Fraser
6. Bostock v Tacher de la Pagerie
7. Coombes v Parry
8. Evans v Engelson
9. Ghelani v Bowie
10. Hodges v Blee
11. Kidder v Birch
12. Manaton v Edwards
13. Mansukhani v Sharkey
landlords or members of family, premises required for:hardship
1. Baker v MacIver
2. Hodges v Blee
landlords or members of family, premises required for:illegitimate sons of joint owners
1. Potsos v Theodotou
landlords or members of family, premises required for:intention to occupy
1. Rowe v Truelove
2. Davies v Peterson
3. Kennealy v Dunne
4. Lipton v Whitworth
landlords or members of family, premises required for:intermittent and temporary occupation
1. Davies v Peterson
2. Mistry v Isidore
landlords or members of family, premises required for:investment properties
1. Ghelani v Bowie
landlords or members of family, premises required for:joint owners
1. McIntyre v Hardcastle
2. Tilling v Whiteman
landlords or members of family, premises required for:judicial notice of difficult in finding furnished accommodation
1. Bassett v Fraser
landlords or members of family, premises required for:just and equitable to dispense with notice
1. Bradshaw and Martyn v Baldwin-Wiseman
2. White v Jones
landlords or members of family, premises required for:landlords finding accommodation, consideration of
1. Coombes v Parry
landlords or members of family, premises required for:new houses abroad, landlords intending to build
1. Bissessar v Ghosn
landlords or members of family, premises required for:notice
1. Bradshaw and Martyn v Baldwin-Wiseman
2. Fernandes v Parvardin
3. White v Jones
landlords or members of family, premises required for:oral notice to tenants
1. Fernandes v Parvardin
2. White v Jones
landlords or members of family, premises required for:part share, inheritance of
1. Thomas v Fryer
landlords or members of family, premises required for:permanence of occupation
1. Naish v Curzon
landlords or members of family, premises required for:personal representatives
1. Patel v Patel
landlords or members of family, premises required for:previous occupation as being intermittent and temporary
1. Mistry v Isidore
landlords or members of family, premises required for:purchase, landlords by
1. Amaddio v Dalton
2. Thomas v Fryer
landlords or members of family, premises required for:rehousing by council
1. Manaton v Edwards
landlords or members of family, premises required for:Rent Act tenancies
1. Owner-occupiers
2. Premises required for landlord or member of family (Rent Act 1977 Sch 15 Case 9)
3. Alexander v Mohamadzadeh
4. Amaddio v Dalton
5. Baker v MacIver
6. Bassett v Fraser
7. Bostock v Tacher de la Pagerie
8. Coombes v Parry
9. Evans v Engelson
10. Ghelani v Bowie
11. Hodges v Blee
12. Kidder v Birch
13. Manaton v Edwards
14. Mansukhani v Sharkey
landlords or members of family, premises required for:sale:compensation for former tenants
1. Clements v Simmonds
landlords or members of family, premises required for:sale:intention to live in property until sale
1. Rowe v Truelove
2. Lipton v Whitworth
landlords or members of family, premises required for:sale:new houses abroad, landlords intending to build
1. Bissessar v Ghosn
landlords or members of family, premises required for:tenants in common, premises required for equitable
1. Bostock v Tacher de la Pagerie
landlords or members of family, premises required for:visits to partners not amounting to occupation
1. Ibie v Trubshaw
language:possession proceedings, adjournment of
1. Verrilli v Idigoras
language:translation of offer letters
1. Ali v Birmingham CC
laundry of bed linen
1. Nelson Developments Ltd v Taboada
legal aid:possession proceedings, adjournment of
1. Bates v Croydon LBC
legal representation in possession proceedings
1. Bates v Croydon LBC
2. Verrilli v Idigoras
legitimate expectations
1. Veselinski v Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
2. R (Bibi (No 1) and Al-Nashed) v Newham LBC
letters:broad, commonsense way, letters to be read in a
1. Nzamy v Brent LBC
letters:clear explanations of offers
1. Griffiths v St Helens Council
letters:disrepair, notice of
1. Al Hassani v Merrigan
letters:homelessness
1. R v Chiltern DC ex p Roberts
2. Nzamy v Brent LBC
3. Lambeth LBC v Johnston
4. Adams v Southwark LBC
5. Ali v Birmingham CC
6. Griffiths v St Helens Council
letters:material matters, letters failed to address
1. R v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p Kassam
letters:‘minded to’ letters, mandatory obligation to send
1. Lambeth LBC v Johnston
letters:new tenancies, interpreted as
1. Epping Forest DC v Pomphrett
letters:post and not returned, requests made if sent by ordinary
1. Adams v Southwark LBC
letters:succession
1. Epping Forest DC v Pomphrett
letters:surrender
1. Brent LBC v Sharma and Vyas
letters:transfers of tenancies, letters from tenants regarding
1. Brent LBC v Sharma and Vyas
letters:translation of offer letters
1. Ali v Birmingham CC
Lettings Direct Scheme, referrals to
1. R (Raw) v Lambeth LBC
licences:buying other flat, loss on
1. Tyler v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
licences:contingent on tenancy of other flat, where
1. Tyler v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
licences:cruise, licence of houseboats to
1. R v Hillingdon LBC ex p Bax
licences:damages for harassment and illegal eviction
1. Mehta v Royal Bank of Scotland
licences:definition
1. The distinction between tenancies and licences – generally
licences:exclusive possession
1. Mansfield DC v Langridge
licences:harassment
1. Khorasandjian v Bush
2. Mehta v Royal Bank of Scotland
licences:homelessness:cruise, licence of houseboats to
1. R v Hillingdon LBC ex p Bax
licences:homelessness:houseboat owners without permanent moorings
1. R v Hillingdon LBC ex p Bax
licences:homelessness:leave, where asked to leave
1. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p O’Sullivan
licences:homelessness:Protection from Eviction Act 1977
1. Desnousse v Newham LBC
licences:homelessness:unprotected licensees
1. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p O’Sullivan
licences:hostels
1. Rogerson v Wigan MBC
licences:hotel rooms
1. Mehta v Royal Bank of Scotland
licences:houseboat owners without permanent moorings
1. R v Hillingdon LBC ex p Bax
licences:housing associations
1. Islington LBC v Green
licences:illegal eviction, damages for
1. Mehta v Royal Bank of Scotland
licences:introductory tenancies
1. Introductory tenancies
licences:leave, where asked to leave
1. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p O’Sullivan
licences:possession
1. Camden LBC v Shortlife Community Housing Ltd and Others
licences:private sector
1. Tower Hamlets LBC v Miah
licences:Protection from Eviction Act 1977
1. Protection from Eviction Act 1977 (civil provisions)
2. Desnousse v Newham LBC
3. Rogerson v Wigan MBC
licences:rent
1. Mansfield DC v Langridge
licences:separate dwelling, let as a
1. Mansfield DC v Langridge
2. Parkins v Westminster CC
3. Tyler v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
licences:shared council housing
1. Monmouth BC v Marlog
2. Parkins v Westminster CC
licences:subtenancies
1. Islington LBC v Green
2. Monmouth BC v Marlog
3. Camden LBC v Shortlife Community Housing Ltd and Others
licences:surrender by moving out
1. Bone v Bone
licences:telephone calls, harassment by
1. Khorasandjian v Bush
licences:trespassers
1. Manchester Airport plc v Dutton
licences:unprotected licensees
1. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p O’Sullivan
licences granted to employees
1. Licences – occupation granted to employees
2. Norris v Checksfield
3. Postcastle Properties v Perridge
4. Royal Philanthropic Society v County
licences granted to employees:assured tenancies
1. Licences – occupation granted to employees
licences granted to employees:change of owners
1. Postcastle Properties v Perridge
licences granted to employees:exclusive possession
1. Licences – occupation granted to employees
licences granted to employees:factual nexus between occupation and employment
1. Norris v Checksfield
licences granted to employees:informal arrangements
1. Royal Philanthropic Society v County
licences granted to employees:low rent under informal arrangements
1. Royal Philanthropic Society v County
licences granted to employees:notice to quit when employment terminated
1. Norris v Checksfield
licences granted to employees:possession
1. Licences – occupation granted to employees
licences granted to employees:Rent Act tenancies
1. Licences – occupation granted to employees
licences granted to employees:service tenancies
1. Licences – occupation granted to employees
licences granted to employees:termination of employment
1. Norris v Checksfield
2. Postcastle Properties v Perridge
licence/tenancy distinction
1. The distinction between tenancies and licences – generally
2. Bruton v London and Quadrant Housing Trust
3. Eastleigh BC v Walsh
4. Street v Mountford
5. Ashburn Anstalt v Arnold
6. Aslan v Murphy (No 1)
7. Brennan v Lambeth LBC
8. Bretherton v Paton
9. Brillouet v Landless
10. Crancour Ltd v Da Silvaesa
11. Family Housing Association v Jones
12. Gray v Taylor
13. Huwyler v Ruddy
14. Nutt v Read
15. Skipton Building Society v Clayton
16. Kirby v Lynch
17. Mew v Tristmire Limited
licence/tenancy distinction:almshouses
1. Gray v Taylor
licence/tenancy distinction:artificially separate licence agreements
1. Antoniades v Villiers and Bridger
licence/tenancy distinction:chalets, mistake concerning agreements to buy
1. Nutt v Read
licence/tenancy distinction:character of landlord, irrelevance of
1. Bruton v London and Quadrant Housing Trust
licence/tenancy distinction:contracts of sale
1. Bretherton v Paton
licence/tenancy distinction:exceptional circumstances rebutting presumption of tenancy
1. Sharp v McArthur
licence/tenancy distinction:exclusive possession
1. Bruton v London and Quadrant Housing Trust
2. Aslan v Murphy (No 1)
3. Brillouet v Landless
4. Skipton Building Society v Clayton
5. Nunn v Dalrymple
6. AG Securities v Vaughan
licence/tenancy distinction:extreme, terms of licence as being
1. Crancour Ltd v Da Silvaesa
licence/tenancy distinction:family relationships
1. Errington v Errington and Woods
2. Marcroft Wagons Ltd v Smith
3. Meynell Family Properties Ltd v Meynell
4. Nunn v Dalrymple
5. Ward v Warnke
licence/tenancy distinction:hallmarks of tenancies, presence of
1. Kirby v Lynch
licence/tenancy distinction:harassment and illegal eviction
1. Civil proceedings
licence/tenancy distinction:homeless persons
1. Brennan v Lambeth LBC
2. Family Housing Association v Jones
licence/tenancy distinction:hotels
1. Brillouet v Landless
licence/tenancy distinction:houseboats
1. Mew v Tristmire Limited
licence/tenancy distinction:individual rooms, exclusive possession of
1. AG Securities v Vaughan
licence/tenancy distinction:informal arrangements
1. The distinction between tenancies and licences – informal arrangements
2. Errington v Errington and Woods
3. Marcroft Wagons Ltd v Smith
4. Meynell Family Properties Ltd v Meynell
5. Nunn v Dalrymple
6. Sharp v McArthur
7. Vaughan-Armatrading v Sarsah
8. Ward v Warnke
licence/tenancy distinction:intention
1. Kirby v Lynch
2. Errington v Errington and Woods
3. Marcroft Wagons Ltd v Smith
4. Meynell Family Properties Ltd v Meynell
licence/tenancy distinction:joint tenancies
1. AG Securities v Vaughan
2. Antoniades v Villiers and Bridger
licence/tenancy distinction:keys, exclusive possession of
1. Aslan v Murphy (No 1)
licence/tenancy distinction:labels
1. Eastleigh BC v Walsh
2. Family Housing Association v Jones
licence/tenancy distinction:leave room for 90 mins a day, requirement to
1. Aslan v Murphy (No 1)
licence/tenancy distinction:licence, definition of
1. The distinction between tenancies and licences – generally
licence/tenancy distinction:mistake
1. Nutt v Read
licence/tenancy distinction:moved, provisions enabling persons to be
1. Brennan v Lambeth LBC
licence/tenancy distinction:non-exclusive occupation agreements
1. The distinction between tenancies and licences – ‘non-exclusive occupation agreements’
2. AG Securities v Vaughan
3. Antoniades v Villiers and Bridger
licence/tenancy distinction:prospective purchasers where no binding contract of sale
1. Bretherton v Paton
licence/tenancy distinction:rebuttal of presumption of tenancy
1. Sharp v McArthur
licence/tenancy distinction:rent
1. Nunn v Dalrymple
2. Ward v Warnke
licence/tenancy distinction:security of tenure
1. The distinction between tenancies and licences – generally
licence/tenancy distinction:services, contractual right to
1. Huwyler v Ruddy
licence/tenancy distinction:shams
1. Aslan v Murphy (No 1)
2. Crancour Ltd v Da Silvaesa
licence/tenancy distinction:shared accommodation as joint tenancies
1. AG Securities v Vaughan
2. Antoniades v Villiers and Bridger
licence/tenancy distinction:staying on
1. Marcroft Wagons Ltd v Smith
2. Vaughan-Armatrading v Sarsah
licence/tenancy distinction:subjective intention of landlords
1. Kirby v Lynch
licence/tenancy distinction:subtenants’ staying on after termination of head leases
1. Vaughan-Armatrading v Sarsah
licence/tenancy distinction:title
1. Bruton v London and Quadrant Housing Trust
licence/tenancy distinction:trust, beneficiaries under a
1. Gray v Taylor
life, right to
1. Article 2: Right to life
2. Budayeva v Russia
lifts:maintenance
1. Berryman v Hounslow LBC
2. Electricity Supply Nominees Ltd v National Magazine Co Ltd
lifts:rent, reference to
1. Electricity Supply Nominees Ltd v National Magazine Co Ltd
lifts:repairing covenants
1. Electricity Supply Nominees Ltd v National Magazine Co Ltd
lights:bathrooms
1. Symons v Warren
local connection and referral, homelessness and
1. Local connection and referral
2. Al-Ameri v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC; Osmani v Harrow LBC
3. Mohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
4. Re Betts
5. Ozbek v Ipswich BC
6. R v Greenwich LBC ex p Patterson
7. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Avdic
8. R v Ealing LBC ex p Fox
9. R v East Devon DC ex p Robb
10. R v Islington LBC ex p Adigun
11. R (Bantamagbari) v Westminster CC and Southwark LBC
local connection and referral, homelessness and:asylum seekers
1. Local connection and referral
2. Al-Ameri v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC; Osmani v Harrow LBC
local connection and referral, homelessness and:choice, residence of
1. Al-Ameri v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC; Osmani v Harrow LBC
local connection and referral, homelessness and:conditions
1. Local connection and referral
local connection and referral, homelessness and:date of decisions/reviews
1. Mohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
local connection and referral, homelessness and:delay in challenging referring authority’s decision
1. R (Bantamagbari) v Westminster CC and Southwark LBC
local connection and referral, homelessness and:discharge of duty
1. R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Ali and Bibi
local connection and referral, homelessness and:discretion
1. Local connection and referral
2. R v East Devon DC ex p Robb
local connection and referral, homelessness and:dispute resolution
1. Local connection and referral
local connection and referral, homelessness and:domestic violence, errors in deciding applicants do not run risk of
1. R v Islington LBC ex p Adigun
local connection and referral, homelessness and:employment includes unpaid work
1. R v Ealing LBC ex p Fox
local connection and referral, homelessness and:family associations
1. Ozbek v Ipswich BC
2. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Avdic
local connection and referral, homelessness and:guidelines
1. Local connection and referral
2. Re Betts
3. R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Camden LBC
local connection and referral, homelessness and:interim accommodation
1. Mohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
local connection and referral, homelessness and:lawfully in UK, duties owed to all persons
1. R v Hillingdon LBC ex p Streeting
local connection and referral, homelessness and:Local Authority Agreement, guidelines in
1. Re Betts
local connection and referral, homelessness and:main housing duties
1. Local connection and referral
local connection and referral, homelessness and:medical treatment
1. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Avdic
local connection and referral, homelessness and:NASS accommodation as normal residence
1. Al-Ameri v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC; Osmani v Harrow LBC
local connection and referral, homelessness and:reviews
1. Sareen v Hackney LBC
local connection and referral, homelessness and:second authority, views of
1. R v Slough BC ex p Ealing LBC
local connection and referral, homelessness and:time for consideration
1. Mohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
local connection and referral, homelessness and:unpaid work
1. R v Ealing LBC ex p Fox
local connection and referral, homelessness and:violence in other areas, mandatory duty to enquire into risk of
1. R v Greenwich LBC ex p Patterson
lodgers
1. Lewis v Weldcrest Ltd
2. Anti-social behaviour
long term, accommodation not suitable for
1. Birmingham CC v Ali and Aweys; Moran v Manchester CC
low standard accommodation, liability in negligence for
1. McNerny v Lambeth LBC
lynch mob behaviour by tenants
1. Tower Hamlets LBC v Long
maintenance:charges, set-off of
1. Unchained Growth III plc v Granby Village (Manchester) Management Co Ltd
maintenance:common parts
1. Liverpool CC v Irwin
maintenance:lifts
1. Berryman v Hounslow LBC
2. Electricity Supply Nominees Ltd v National Magazine Co Ltd
maintenance:safe, keeping property
1. Alker v Collingwood Housing Association
maintenance:service charges and long leases
1. Unchained Growth III plc v Granby Village (Manchester) Management Co Ltd
maladministration
1. Anufrijeva v Southwark LBC
meaning of home:article 8
1. Brogan v UK
2. Gillow v UK
3. Globa v Ukraine
4. Khamidov v Russia
5. Kryvitska and Kryvitskyy v Ukraine
6. Blecic v Croatia
7. JL v United Kingdom
medical advisers, opinions of
1. Shala v Birmingham CC
2. Simms v Islington LBC
3. R v Lambeth LBC ex p Walters
medical assessments
1. R (Adow) v Newham LBC
2. R v Medina BC ex p Dee
3. R v Lambeth LBC ex p Walters
medical evidence :errors in assessments
1. Allison v Wandsworth LBC
medical evidence :intentional homelessness
1. Hijazi v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
medical evidence :manage affairs, applicants capacity to
1. Hijazi v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
medical evidence :vulnerable persons
1. Allison v Wandsworth LBC
medical treatment
1. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Avdic
mental disabilities:capacity
1. Camden LBC v M
2. Hijazi v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
3. R v Wirral MBC ex p Bell
4. R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Ferdous Begum
mental disabilities:commencement of possession proceedings
1. Camden LBC v M
mental disabilities:depression
1. McCarthy v Khosla
2. Smyth v Farnworth
mental disabilities:homelessness
1. Hijazi v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
2. R v Wirral MBC ex p Bell
3. R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Ferdous Begum
4. R v Westminster CC ex p Abdulkadir
mental disabilities:intentional homelessness
1. Hijazi v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
2. R v Wirral MBC ex p Bell
mental disabilities:manage affairs, applicants capacity to
1. Hijazi v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
2. R v Wirral MBC ex p Bell
mental disabilities:medical evidence
1. Hijazi v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
mental disabilities:notice
1. R v Westminster CC ex p Abdulkadir
mental disabilities:occupation as a residence
1. Tickner v Hearn
mesne profits
1. Mesne profits
2. Ministry of Defence v Ashman
3. Ministry of Defence v Thompson
4. Shi v Jiangsu Native Produce Import & Export Corp
5. Swordheath Properties Ltd v Tabet
6. Viscount Chelsea v Hutchinson
mesne profits:armed forces, quarters for
1. Ministry of Defence v Ashman
2. Ministry of Defence v Thompson
3. Shi v Jiangsu Native Produce Import & Export Corp
mesne profits:calculation
1. Mesne profits
2. Ministry of Defence v Ashman
3. Ministry of Defence v Thompson
4. Shi v Jiangsu Native Produce Import & Export Corp
5. Swordheath Properties Ltd v Tabet
mesne profits:concessionary rates or council rates for armed forces
1. Ministry of Defence v Thompson
mesne profits:damages
1. Mesne profits
2. Swordheath Properties Ltd v Tabet
mesne profits:former head lessees, against
1. Viscount Chelsea v Hutchinson
mesne profits:letting value
1. Swordheath Properties Ltd v Tabet
mesne profits:open market value
1. Ministry of Defence v Ashman
mesne profits:rehousing, armed forces awaiting
1. Ministry of Defence v Thompson
mesne profits:special circumstances where occupants would never have had to pay full market rent
1. Ministry of Defence v Ashman
mesne profits:subtenancies
1. Braintree DC v Vincent
mesne profits:trespassers
1. Mesne profits
mesne profits:vacant possession, calculation of loss suffered by deprivation of
1. Shi v Jiangsu Native Produce Import & Export Corp
mesne profits:value to trespassers, measure of damages as
1. Swordheath Properties Ltd v Tabet
mice infestation
1. London & Quadrant Housing Trust v Riemy
misrepresentation
1. Islington LBC v Uckac
2. Neil v Kingsnorth
mitigation
1. Reichman v Beveridge
2. Damages
3. Wandsworth LBC v Osei-Bonsu
mixed business/residential use
1. Wagle v Trustees of Henry Smith’s Charity Kensington Estate
2. Webb v Barnet LBC
3. Pirabakaran v Patel
mortgage arrears:adjournments
1. Halifax plc v Taffs
2. Skandia Financial Services Ltd v Greenfield
mortgage arrears:no prospect of payment
1. Abbey National Mortgages v Bernard
mortgage arrears:payment
1. Halifax plc v Taffs
2. Abbey National Mortgages v Bernard
3. Citibank Trust Ltd v Ayivor
mortgage arrears:reasonable period
1. National and Provincial Building Society v Lloyd
2. Citibank Trust Ltd v Ayivor
3. Skandia Financial Services Ltd v Greenfield
mortgage arrears:sale of property
1. National and Provincial Building Society v Lloyd
mortgage arrears:shortfall of mortgage advances, recovery of
1. West Bromwich Building Society v Wilkinson
mortgage arrears:surveyors, cause of action against
1. Citibank Trust Ltd v Ayivor
mortgage arrears:suspension of orders
1. Abbey National Mortgages v Bernard
mortgage arrears:writing, agreements in
1. Target Holdings Ltd v Priestley
mortgage possession proceedings
1. Abbey National v Gibson
2. Albany Home Loans Ltd v Massey
mortgage possession proceedings:abuse of process
1. Securum Finance Ltd v Ashton
mortgage possession proceedings:adjournments
1. Birmingham Citizens Permanent Building Society v Caunt
2. Halifax plc v Taffs
3. Cheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Obi
4. First Middlesbrough Trading and Mortgage Co Ltd v Cunningham
5. Skandia Financial Services Ltd v Greenfield
mortgage possession proceedings:all moneys charge
1. Habib Bank v Tailor
mortgage possession proceedings:appeals
1. Hyde Park Funding Ltd v Ioannou
2. Lloyds TSB plc v Jayashankar
mortgage possession proceedings:arrears
1. Halifax plc v Taffs
2. Abbey National Mortgages v Bernard
3. National and Provincial Building Society v Lloyd
4. Citibank Trust Ltd v Ayivor
5. Skandia Financial Services Ltd v Greenfield
6. Target Holdings Ltd v Priestley
7. West Bromwich Building Society v Wilkinson
mortgage possession proceedings:bankrupts, standing of
1. Nationwide Building Society v Purvis
mortgage possession proceedings:best price, attainment of
1. Bradford and Bingley plc v Ross
2. Mortgage Express v Mardner
3. Raja v Lloyds TSB
mortgage possession proceedings:circumstances of case, reasonableness as dependent on
1. Western Bank v Schindler
mortgage possession proceedings:connected or associated companies, sale to
1. Bradford and Bingley plc v Ross
2. Mortgage Express v Mardner
mortgage possession proceedings:Consumer Credit Act 1974
1. Consumer Credit Act 1974
2. Broadwick Financial Services Ltd v Spencer
3. First National Bank v Syed
4. Rahman v Sterling Credit Ltd
5. Southern and District Finance plc v Barnes
6. Barclays Bank plc v Brooks
7. Cedar Holdings v Jenkins
8. City Mortgage Corp Ltd v Baptiste
mortgage possession proceedings:contra proferentem rule
1. Bank of Scotland v Ladjadj
mortgage possession proceedings:counterclaims
1. City Mortgage Corp Ltd v Baptiste
2. Royal Bank of Scotland v O’Shea
mortgage possession proceedings:county courts
1. Yorkshire Bank plc v Hall
mortgage possession proceedings:discretion
1. Southern and District Finance plc v Barnes
mortgage possession proceedings:documents:construction
1. Bank of Scotland v Ladjadj
mortgage possession proceedings:documents:evidence of how sums calculated
1. Halifax plc v Alexander
mortgage possession proceedings:dwelling houses, time for consideration of whether premises includes
1. Royal Bank of Scotland v Miller
mortgage possession proceedings:endowment mortgages
1. Bank of Scotland v Grimes
mortgage possession proceedings:enforcement of possession orders
1. Abbey National v Gibson
mortgage possession proceedings:evidence
1. Halifax plc v Alexander
2. Cheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Grant
mortgage possession proceedings:execution of warrants
1. Cheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Obi
2. Mortgage Agency Services v Bal
3. Hyde Park Funding Ltd v Ioannou
4. Lloyds TSB plc v Jayashankar
mortgage possession proceedings:extended by offers of settlement, time limits
1. Bradford and Bingley plc v Rashid
mortgage possession proceedings:extortionate credit bargains
1. Broadwick Financial Services Ltd v Spencer
2. Paragon Finance Ltd v Nash; Paragon Finance plc v Staunton
3. City Mortgage Corp Ltd v Baptiste
mortgage possession proceedings:fairness
1. Lloyds Bank plc v Dix
mortgage possession proceedings:financial factors, taking into account of
1. Polonski v Lloyds Bank Mortgages Ltd
mortgage possession proceedings:fraud
1. R v Barnet LBC ex p Rughooputh
mortgage possession proceedings:High Court
1. Cheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Krausz
mortgage possession proceedings:hopelessness of case
1. Lloyds Bank plc v Dix
mortgage possession proceedings:implied terms
1. Rahman v Sterling Credit Ltd
mortgage possession proceedings:instalments:agreements to pay by
1. Emery v UCB Bank plc
2. Royal Bank of Scotland v Elmes
mortgage possession proceedings:instalments:power to order
1. First National Bank v Syed
mortgage possession proceedings:instalments:promissory estoppel
1. Emery v UCB Bank plc
mortgage possession proceedings:instalments:suspension of warrants
1. Royal Bank of Scotland v Elmes
mortgage possession proceedings:insurance policies
1. Woolwich Building Society v Brown
mortgage possession proceedings:intentional homelessness
1. William v Wandsworth LBC; Bellamy v Hounslow LBC
2. R v Barnet LBC ex p Rughooputh
3. Watchman v Ipswich BC
4. R v Shrewsbury and Atcham BC ex p Griffiths
mortgage possession proceedings:interest:rates
1. Rahman v Sterling Credit Ltd
2. Consumer Credit Act 1974
3. Paragon Finance Ltd v Nash; Paragon Finance plc v Staunton
4. Cedar Holdings v Jenkins
mortgage possession proceedings:interest:time limits
1. Bristol and West plc v Bartlett
2. Scottish Equitable v Thompson
mortgage possession proceedings:joint borrowers
1. Albany Home Loans Ltd v Massey
mortgage possession proceedings:merits of case
1. Lloyds Bank plc v Dix
mortgage possession proceedings:money judgments
1. Cheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Grattidge
2. Cheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Johnson
mortgage possession proceedings:mortgagors, tenants of
1. Tenants of mortgagors
2. Berkshire Capital Funding Ltd v Street
3. Britannia Building Society v Earl
4. Lloyds Bank plc v Doyle and Others
5. Mann v Nijar
6. Sadiq v Hussain
7. Walthamstow Building Society v Davies
8. Woolwich Building Society v Dickman
9. Abbey National plc v Yusuf
10. National Westminster Home Loans v Riches
mortgage possession proceedings:peaceful enjoyment of possessions
1. Barclays Bank v Alcorn
mortgage possession proceedings:possession orders
1. UCB Bank plc v Chandler
2. Abbey National v Gibson
3. Albany Home Loans Ltd v Massey
mortgage possession proceedings:private and family life, right to respect for
1. Barclays Bank v Alcorn
mortgage possession proceedings:promissory estoppel
1. Emery v UCB Bank plc
mortgage possession proceedings:reasonableness:adjournments
1. First Middlesbrough Trading and Mortgage Co Ltd v Cunningham
2. Skandia Financial Services Ltd v Greenfield
mortgage possession proceedings:reasonableness:arrears, payment of
1. National and Provincial Building Society v Lloyd
2. Citibank Trust Ltd v Ayivor
4. Skandia Financial Services Ltd v Greenfield
mortgage possession proceedings:reasonableness:circumstances of case
1. Western Bank v Schindler
mortgage possession proceedings:reasonableness:sale, time for
1. Bristol and West Building Society v Ellis
2. National and Provincial Building Society v Lloyd
mortgage possession proceedings:reasonableness:suspended possession orders
1. Cheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Norgan
mortgage possession proceedings:regulated agreements
1. Consumer Credit Act 1974
mortgage possession proceedings:remortgage to pay instalments, failure to use money from
1. William v Wandsworth LBC; Bellamy v Hounslow LBC
mortgage possession proceedings:right to possession
1. Credit & Mercantile plc v Marks
mortgage possession proceedings:sale:best price, attainment of
1. Bradford and Bingley plc v Ross
2. Mortgage Express v Mardner
3. Raja v Lloyds TSB
mortgage possession proceedings:sale:connected or associated companies, sale to
1. Bradford and Bingley plc v Ross
2. Mortgage Express v Mardner
mortgage possession proceedings:sale:early sales, prospects of
1. Target Home Loans v Clothier
mortgage possession proceedings:sale:financial factors, taking into account
1. Polonski v Lloyds Bank Mortgages Ltd
mortgage possession proceedings:sale:High Court
1. Cheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Krausz
mortgage possession proceedings:sale:jurisdiction
1. Palk v Mortgage Services Funding
mortgage possession proceedings:sale:orders for sale
1. Bradford and Bingley plc v Ross
2. Mortgage Express v Mardner
3. Palk v Mortgage Services Funding
mortgage possession proceedings:sale:reasonable period
1. Bristol and West Building Society v Ellis
2. National and Provincial Building Society v Lloyd
mortgage possession proceedings:sale:rent arrears, payment of
1. National and Provincial Building Society v Lloyd
mortgage possession proceedings:sale:shortfall, leave where sale would leave a mortgage
1. Barrett v Halifax Building Society
mortgage possession proceedings:sale:social factors, taking into account
1. Polonski v Lloyds Bank Mortgages Ltd
mortgage possession proceedings:sale:suspended possession orders
1. Cheltenham and Gloucester plc v Booker
2. Mortgage Service Funding plc v Steele
3. Target Home Loans v Clothier
4. Cheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Krausz
mortgage possession proceedings:sale:who should sell property
1. Mortgage Service Funding plc v Steele
mortgage possession proceedings:set-offs
1. Royal Bank of Scotland v O’Shea
mortgage possession proceedings:settlements
1. Bradford and Bingley plc v Rashid
mortgage possession proceedings:shortfall of mortgages
1. Barrett v Halifax Building Society
2. West Bromwich Building Society v Wilkinson
mortgage possession proceedings:social factors, taking into account
1. Polonski v Lloyds Bank Mortgages Ltd
mortgage possession proceedings:specification of amounts outstanding
1. Abbey National v Gibson
mortgage possession proceedings:standing
1. Nationwide Building Society v Purvis
mortgage possession proceedings:stay of execution
1. Mortgage Express v Da Rocha-Afodu
mortgage possession proceedings:striking out
1. Barclays Bank plc v Brooks
mortgage possession proceedings:subcharges
1. Credit & Mercantile plc v Marks
mortgage possession proceedings:subletting, prohibition in deed against
1. Citibank International plc v Kessler
mortgage possession proceedings:surveyors, cause of action against
1. Citibank Trust Ltd v Ayivor
mortgage possession proceedings:suspended possession orders
1. Cheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Frasca
2. Hyde Park Funding Ltd v Ioannou
3. Lloyds TSB plc v Jayashankar
4. Royal Bank of Scotland v Elmes
mortgage possession proceedings:suspended possession orders:appeals after execution of warrants
1. Hyde Park Funding Ltd v Ioannou
2. Lloyds TSB plc v Jayashankar
mortgage possession proceedings:suspended possession orders:arrears, where no prospect of reducing
1. Abbey National Mortgages v Bernard
mortgage possession proceedings:suspended possession orders:early sale, prospect of
1. Target Home Loans v Clothier
mortgage possession proceedings:suspended possession orders:execution of warrants
1. Mortgage Agency Services v Bal
2. Hyde Park Funding Ltd v Ioannou
3. Lloyds TSB plc v Jayashankar
mortgage possession proceedings:suspended possession orders:fixing period of time
1. Royal Trust Co of Canada v Markham
mortgage possession proceedings:suspended possession orders:general terms
1. Royal Trust Co of Canada v Markham
mortgage possession proceedings:suspended possession orders:inherent jurisdiction
1. Cheltenham and Gloucester plc v Booker
mortgage possession proceedings:suspended possession orders:instalments, agreements to pay by
1. Royal Bank of Scotland v Elmes
mortgage possession proceedings:suspended possession orders:money judgments
1. Cheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Grattidge
2. Cheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Johnson
mortgage possession proceedings:suspended possession orders:no further applications, orders for
1. Abbey National Building Society v Mewton
mortgage possession proceedings:suspended possession orders:reasonable period
1. Cheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Norgan
mortgage possession proceedings:suspended possession orders:refusal to suspend
1. Cheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Frasca
2. Hyde Park Funding Ltd v Ioannou
mortgage possession proceedings:suspended possession orders:sale of property
1. Cheltenham and Gloucester plc v Booker
2. Target Home Loans v Clothier
3. Cheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Krausz
mortgage possession proceedings:suspended possession orders:terms of mortgage
1. Centrax Trustees v Ross
mortgage possession proceedings:terms of mortgage
1. Centrax Trustees v Ross
mortgage possession proceedings:time limits
1. Securum Finance Ltd v Ashton
2. Rahman v Sterling Credit Ltd
3. Bradford and Bingley plc v Rashid
4. Bristol and West plc v Bartlett
5. Scottish Equitable v Thompson
6. West Bromwich Building Society v Wilkinson
mortgage possession proceedings:time orders
1. Consumer Credit Act 1974
2. Southern and District Finance plc v Barnes
3. Cedar Holdings v Jenkins
mortgage possession proceedings:warrants
1. Royal Bank of Scotland v Elmes
2. Abbey National v Gibson
3. Bradford and Bingley plc v Rashid
4. Cheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Krausz
mortgages:business mortgage default
1. R v Wandsworth LBC ex p Onwudiwe
mortgages:failure to pay instalments
1. William v Wandsworth LBC; Bellamy v Hounslow LBC
mortgages:forfeiture
1. Escalus Properties Ltd v Robinson
mortgages:fraud
1. R v Barnet LBC ex p Rughooputh
mortgages:intentional homelessness
1. William v Wandsworth LBC; Bellamy v Hounslow LBC
2. R v Barnet LBC ex p Rughooputh
3. R v Wandsworth LBC ex p Onwudiwe
mortgages:private and family life and home, right to respect for
1. Wood v UK
mortgagors, tenants of:charges, second mortgages executed to replace earlier defective
1. Walthamstow Building Society v Davies
mortgagors, tenants of:consent
1. Tenants of mortgagors
2. Lloyds Bank plc v Doyle and Others
3. Sadiq v Hussain
4. Woolwich Building Society v Dickman
mortgagors, tenants of:illegality, tenancies void unless waiver of
1. Sadiq v Hussain
mortgagors, tenants of:mortgage possession proceedings
1. Tenants of mortgagors
2. Berkshire Capital Funding Ltd v Street
3. Britannia Building Society v Earl
4. Lloyds Bank plc v Doyle and Others
5. Mann v Nijar
6. Sadiq v Hussain
7. Walthamstow Building Society v Davies
8. Woolwich Building Society v Dickman
9. Abbey National plc v Yusuf
10. National Westminster Home Loans v Riches
mortgagors, tenants of:mortgagor, tenants as within definition of
1. Abbey National plc v Yusuf
mortgagors, tenants of:prior mortgagees, second mortgagees could not destroy tenancy granted by
1. Berkshire Capital Funding Ltd v Street
mortgagors, tenants of:prior tenancies
1. Berkshire Capital Funding Ltd v Street
2. Lloyds Bank plc v Doyle and Others
3. Walthamstow Building Society v Davies
4. Woolwich Building Society v Dickman
mortgagors, tenants of:receivers, confirmation of tenancies by collection of rent by
1. Mann v Nijar
mortgagors, tenants of:redeem of mortgage, suspension of orders to allow tenants to
1. National Westminster Home Loans v Riches
mortgagors, tenants of:second mortgages
1. Berkshire Capital Funding Ltd v Street
2. Walthamstow Building Society v Davies
mortgagors, tenants of:signed rights away, where tenants have
1. Woolwich Building Society v Dickman
mortgagors, tenants of:subsequent tenancies
1. Britannia Building Society v Earl
2. Lloyds Bank plc v Doyle and Others
mortgagors, tenants of:suspension of possession orders
1. Abbey National plc v Yusuf
2. National Westminster Home Loans v Riches
mortgagors, tenants of:types of property used for letting, where premises
1. Lloyds Bank plc v Doyle and Others
mortgagors, tenants of:waiver of illegality
1. Sadiq v Hussain
moss on steps
1. Brunskill v Mulcahy
multiple needs, assessment of
1. General
mutual co-operative tenancies
1. Ali Bhai and Cabare v Black Roof CHA Ltd
National Assistance Act 1948
1. Introduction
National Assistance Act 1948:destitution
1. Introduction
National Assistance Act 1948:homelessness
1. Introduction
Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002
1. Introduction
Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002:safety net
1. Introduction
negative covenants
1. Savva v Houssein
negligence:banisters
1. Walker v Nottingham CC
negligence:builders and designers, liability of landlords as
1. Rimmer v Liverpool CC
2. Targett v Torfaen BC
negligence:building subcontractors
1. D & F Estates Ltd v Church Commissioners
negligence:cockroach infestation
1. Sharpe v Manchester MDC
negligence:contributory negligence
1. Damages
negligence:disrepair:banisters
1. Walker v Nottingham CC
negligence:disrepair:builders and designers, liability of landlords as
1. Rimmer v Liverpool CC
2. Targett v Torfaen BC
negligence:disrepair:building subcontractors
1. D & F Estates Ltd v Church Commissioners
negligence:disrepair:cockroach infestation
1. Sharpe v Manchester MDC
negligence:disrepair:duty of care
1. Stockley v Knowsley MBC
2. Hawkins v Dhawan
negligence:disrepair:low standard accommodation
1. McNerny v Lambeth LBC
negligence:disrepair:paths
1. Lips v Older
negligence:disrepair:pipe overflows
1. Hawkins v Dhawan
negligence:duty of care
1. Stockley v Knowsley MBC
2. Hawkins v Dhawan
negligence:low standard accommodation, liability in negligence for
1. McNerny v Lambeth LBC
negligence:paths
1. Lips v Older
negligence:pipe overflows
1. Hawkins v Dhawan
neighbourhood, suitability of
1. Dawncar Investments Ltd v Plews
neighbours:sensitive tenants next to each other, placing
1. Brent LBC v Doughan
neighbours:terrorised, where neighbours are
1. Wear Valley DC v Robson
neighbours :adjoining occupiers as being neighbouring occupiers
1. Cobstone Investments Ltd v Maxim
neighbours :definition
1. Northampton BC v Lovatt
neighbours :driven out by neighbours, tenants who have been
1. Stephens v Kerr
neighbours :failure of landlord to take action against neighbours
1. Landlord’s failure to take action against other occupants
2. Mitchell v Glasgow CC
3. Hussain v Lancaster CC
neighbours :injunctions
1. Manchester CC v Lee
neighbours :murder by neighbours
1. Mitchell v Glasgow CC
neighbours :nuisance or annoyance
1. Cobstone Investments Ltd v Maxim
2. Knowsley Housing Trust v McMullen
3. Manchester CC v Lee
4. Wear Valley DC v Robson
neighbours :occupation as a residence
1. Stephens v Kerr
neighbours :particular neighbours, nuisance against
1. Manchester CC v Lee
neighbours :past obsessions with neighbours
1. Knowsley Housing Trust v McMullen
neighbours :reasonableness of possession orders
1. Knowsley Housing Trust v McMullen
neighbours :separate dwelling, let as a
1. Kavanagh v Lyroudias
noise:acoustic evidence
1. Lewisham LBC v Hall
noise:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under
1. Lewisham LBC v Hall
2. R (Vella) v Lambeth LBC and London and Quadrant Housing Trust
noise:sound insulation
1. Southwark LBC v Mills; Southwark LBC v Tanner; Baxter v Camden LBC
2. R (Vella) v Lambeth LBC and London and Quadrant Housing Trust
nominal damages
1. Davies v Peterson
notice requiring possession
1. Notice requiring possession (Housing Act 1988 s21)
2. Aylward v Fawaz
3. Barker v Hands
4. Church Commissioners for England v Meya
5. Elias v Spencer
6. Fernandez v McDonald
7. Gracechurch International v Tribhovan and Abdul
8. Lower Street Properties v Jones
9. Notting Hill Housing Trust v Roomus
10. Singh v Emmanuel
notice requiring possession:‘after the end of your tenancy’, meaning of
1. Notting Hill Housing Trust v Roomus
notice requiring possession:appeals:permission refused
1. Barker v Hands
notice requiring possession:appeals:signature, lack of
1. Barker v Hands
notice requiring possession:assured shorthold tenancies
1. Introduction
2. Notice requiring possession (Housing Act 1988 s21)
3. Aylward v Fawaz
4. Barker v Hands
5. Church Commissioners for England v Meya
6. Elias v Spencer
7. Fernandez v McDonald
8. Gracechurch International v Tribhovan and Abdul
9. Lower Street Properties v Jones
10. Notting Hill Housing Trust v Roomus
11. Singh v Emmanuel
notice requiring possession:‘at the end of your tenancy’, meaning of
1. Notting Hill Housing Trust v Roomus
notice requiring possession:break clauses
1. Aylward v Fawaz
notice requiring possession:date of possession, specification of
1. Lower Street Properties v Jones
notice requiring possession:dispense with notice, no power to
1. Notice requiring possession (Housing Act 1988 s21)
notice requiring possession:exceptional hardship
1. Notice requiring possession (Housing Act 1988 s21)
notice requiring possession:expiry of notice
1. Gracechurch International v Tribhovan and Abdul
2. Lower Street Properties v Jones
notice requiring possession:joint landlords, given by one of several
1. Notice requiring possession (Housing Act 1988 s21)
notice requiring possession:rent was last payable, quarterly or annual tenancies determined by period for when
1. Church Commissioners for England v Meya
notice requiring possession:signatures
1. Barker v Hands
notice requiring possession:strict application of time limits
1. Fernandez v McDonald
notice requiring possession:suspension
1. Notice requiring possession (Housing Act 1988 s21)
notice requiring possession:time limits
1. Introduction
2. Notice requiring possession (Housing Act 1988 s21)
3. Elias v Spencer
4. Fernandez v McDonald
5. Gracechurch International v Tribhovan and Abdul
6. Singh v Emmanuel
notice requiring possession:validity
1. Elias v Spencer
2. Gracechurch International v Tribhovan and Abdul
3. Singh v Emmanuel
notice requiring possession:writing
1. Notice requiring possession (Housing Act 1988 s21)
notice seeking possession
1. Introduction
notice seeking possession:agricultural employees
1. Fowler v Minchin
2. Springfield Investments Ltd v Bell
notice seeking possession:amendments
1. Camden LBC v Oppong
2. Marath v MacGillivray
notice seeking possession:clarity
1. Slough BC v Robbins
notice seeking possession:defective grounds
1. Mountain v Hastings
notice seeking possession:Director of Housing, not signed by
1. City of London Corporation v Devlin
notice seeking possession:discretion
1. Kelsey Housing Association v King
2. Knowsley Housing Trust v Revell; Helena Housing Ltd v Curtis
3. McShane v William Sutton Trust
notice seeking possession:dispensing with notice
1. Notices seeking possession (Housing Act 1985)
2. Braintree DC v Vincent
3. Notice of proceedings for possession (Housing Act 1988)
4. Kelsey Housing Association v King
5. Knowsley Housing Trust v Revell; Helena Housing Ltd v Curtis
6. North British Housing Association v Sheridan
7. McShane v William Sutton Trust
notice seeking possession:errors in particulars of grounds
1. Dudley MBC v Bailey
notice seeking possession:exceptional circumstances, dispensing with NSP in
1. Braintree DC v Vincent
2. Camden LBC v Oppong
notice seeking possession:failure to comply with notice provisions, striking out for
1. Kelsey Housing Association v King
notice seeking possession:grounds
1. Notices seeking possession (Housing Act 1985)
2. Camden LBC v Oppong
3. Notice of proceedings for possession (Housing Act 1988)
4. Marath v MacGillivray
5. Mountain v Hastings
notice seeking possession:Housing Act 1985
1. Introduction
notice seeking possession:Housing Act 1988
1. Introduction
2. Notice of proceedings for possession (Housing Act 1988)
3. Kelsey Housing Association v King
4. Knowsley Housing Trust v Revell; Helena Housing Ltd v Curtis
5. Marath v MacGillivray
6. Mountain v Hastings
7. North British Housing Association v Sheridan
8. McShane v William Sutton Trust
9. Fowler v Minchin
10. Springfield Investments Ltd v Bell
notice seeking possession:just and equitable to dispense with requirement
1. Notices seeking possession (Housing Act 1985)
2. Notice of proceedings for possession (Housing Act 1988)
3. North British Housing Association v Sheridan
notice seeking possession:leave, amendments with
1. Marath v MacGillivray
notice seeking possession:major refurbishment schemes
1. Waltham Forest LBC v England
notice seeking possession:mandatory grounds for rent arrears
1. Marath v MacGillivray
notice seeking possession:mesne profits
1. Braintree DC v Vincent
notice seeking possession:particulars of grounds
1. Notices seeking possession (Housing Act 1985)
2. Camden LBC v Oppong
3. Dudley MBC v Bailey
4. Torridge DC v Jones
5. Slough BC v Robbins
6. Waltham Forest LBC v England
7. Marath v MacGillivray
notice seeking possession:personal circumstances, consideration of
1. Knowsley Housing Trust v Revell; Helena Housing Ltd v Curtis
notice seeking possession:possession
1. Mountain v Hastings
2. North British Housing Association v Sheridan
notice seeking possession:prescribed form, substantially to the same effect as
1. Dudley MBC v Bailey
2. Notice of proceedings for possession (Housing Act 1988)
notice seeking possession:procedural rulings, technical defects defeated by
1. City of London Corporation v Devlin
notice seeking possession:relatively exceptional circumstances, dispensing with NSP in
1. Braintree DC v Vincent
notice seeking possession:rent arrears
1. Torridge DC v Jones
2. Marath v MacGillivray
notice seeking possession:striking out
1. Kelsey Housing Association v King
notice seeking possession:subtenancies
1. Braintree DC v Vincent
notice seeking possession:technical defects
1. City of London Corporation v Devlin
notice to quit:agreements
1. Barrett v Morgan
notice to quit:agricultural holdings as not being a dwelling
1. National Trust for Places of Historic Interest v Knipe
notice to quit:ascertained by tenant, where date could be
1. Addis v Burrows
notice to quit:assured tenancies
1. Subletting the whole of premises
notice to quit:attention, notice not coming to tenant’s
1. Blunden v Frogmore Investments Ltd
notice to quit:commencement of possession proceedings
1. Alamo Housing Co-operative Ltd v Meredith
notice to quit:common law
1. Introduction
2. Enfield LBC v Devonish and Sutton
3. Harler v Calder
notice to quit:contract
1. Harler v Calder
notice to quit:date:ascertained by tenant, where date could be
1. Addis v Burrows
notice to quit:date:expiry of notice
1. Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Clarke
2. Crate v Miller
notice to quit:deceased tenants:served, necessary for notice to be
1. Wirral MBC v Smith
notice to quit:domestic violence, requirement to serve notice when fleeing
1. R (Hammia) v Wandsworth LBC
notice to quit:employees, licences for
1. Norris v Checksfield
notice to quit:expiry of notice
1. Crate v Miller
notice to quit:landlords, served by
1. Addis v Burrows
notice to quit:Law of Property Act 1925, service and
1. Enfield LBC v Devonish and Sutton
2. Wandsworth LBC v Attwell
notice to quit:licences
1. Norris v Checksfield
notice to quit:mistake, test for obvious
1. Carradine Properties Ltd v Aslam
notice to quit:monthly tenancies, period of notice for
1. Precious v Reedie
notice to quit:obvious mistakes, test for
1. Carradine Properties Ltd v Aslam
notice to quit:occupation, rights of
1. Fletcher v Brent LBC
notice to quit:old prescribed forms, use of
1. Beckerman v Durling
2. Swansea CC v Hearn
notice to quit:only or principal home, date for determining whether
1. Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Clarke
notice to quit:postal service
1. Blunden v Frogmore Investments Ltd
notice to quit:property, express provision required for service at
1. Wandsworth LBC v Attwell
notice to quit:Protection from Eviction Act 1977
1. Protection from Eviction Act 1977 (civil provisions)
notice to quit:security of tenure
1. Introduction
notice to quit:service:attention, not coming to tenant’s
1. Blunden v Frogmore Investments Ltd
notice to quit:service:commencement of possession proceedings
1. Alamo Housing Co-operative Ltd v Meredith
notice to quit:service:common law, service to satisfy
1. Enfield LBC v Devonish and Sutton
notice to quit:service:Law of Property Act 1925
1. Enfield LBC v Devonish and Sutton
2. Wandsworth LBC v Attwell
notice to quit:service:post, by
1. Blunden v Frogmore Investments Ltd
notice to quit:service:property, express provision required for service at
1. Wandsworth LBC v Attwell
notice to quit:subtenancies
1. Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Clarke
notice to quit:sufficient interest
1. Alamo Housing Co-operative Ltd v Meredith
notice to quit:surrender
1. Barrett v Morgan
notice to quit:time limits
1. Manorlike Ltd v Le Vitas Travel Agency
2. Schnabel v Allard
3. Precious v Reedie
4. Protection from Eviction Act 1977 (civil provisions)
notice to quit:validity
1. Addis v Burrows
2. Beckerman v Durling
3. Manorlike Ltd v Le Vitas Travel Agency
4. Carradine Properties Ltd v Aslam
notice to quit served by tenants:4 weeks notice, waiver of
1. Hounslow LBC v Pilling
notice to quit served by tenants
1. Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Monk
2. Harrow LBC v Johnstone
3. Newlon Housing Trust v Al-Sulaimen
4. Bater v Bater; Bater v Greenwich LBC
5. Bradford Community Housing Ltd v Hussain
6. Crawley BC v Ure
7. Greenwich LBC v McGrady
8. Hounslow LBC v Pilling
9. Notting Hill Housing Trust v Brackley
notice to quit served by tenants:ambiguity
1. Bradford Community Housing Ltd v Hussain
notice to quit served by tenants:breach of trust
1. Greenwich LBC v McGrady
notice to quit served by tenants:Children Act 1989
1. Bater v Bater; Bater v Greenwich LBC
notice to quit served by tenants:common law, contract not ousting
1. Harler v Calder
notice to quit served by tenants:contract
1. Introduction
2. Harler v Calder
notice to quit served by tenants:date:one day out, as being
1. Mannai Investment Co Ltd v Eagle Star Life Assurance Co Ltd
notice to quit served by tenants:date:reasonable recipient test
1. Mannai Investment Co Ltd v Eagle Star Life Assurance Co Ltd
notice to quit served by tenants:date:savings clause
1. Fletcher v Brent LBC
notice to quit served by tenants:date:wrong date
1. Fletcher v Brent LBC
notice to quit served by tenants:enforcement
1. Crawley BC v Ure
notice to quit served by tenants:excluding other tenants, orders
1. Harrow LBC v Johnstone
notice to quit served by tenants:injunctions:Children Act 1989
1. Bater v Bater; Bater v Greenwich LBC
notice to quit served by tenants:injunctions:joint tenants
1. Bater v Bater; Bater v Greenwich LBC
notice to quit served by tenants:injunctions:Matrimonial Causes Act1973
1. Bater v Bater; Bater v Greenwich LBC
notice to quit served by tenants:joint tenants
1. Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Monk
2. Harrow LBC v Johnstone
3. Greenwich LBC v McGrady
4. Notting Hill Housing Trust v Brackley
notice to quit served by tenants:joint tenants:breach of trust
1. Greenwich LBC v McGrady
notice to quit served by tenants:joint tenants:excluding other tenants, orders
1. Harrow LBC v Johnstone
notice to quit served by tenants:joint tenants:injunctions
1. Bater v Bater; Bater v Greenwich LBC
notice to quit served by tenants:joint tenants:termination of tenancies
1. Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Monk
2. Harrow LBC v Johnstone
notice to quit served by tenants:joint tenants:trusts for sale, breach of
1. Greenwich LBC v McGrady
notice to quit served by tenants:joint tenants:waiver clauses
1. Notting Hill Housing Trust v Brackley
notice to quit served by tenants:jurisdiction
1. Bater v Bater; Bater v Greenwich LBC
notice to quit served by tenants:matrimonial assets
1. Newlon Housing Trust v Al-Sulaimen
notice to quit served by tenants:Matrimonial Causes Act1973
1. Bater v Bater; Bater v Greenwich LBC
notice to quit served by tenants:one day out, where date is
1. Mannai Investment Co Ltd v Eagle Star Life Assurance Co Ltd
notice to quit served by tenants:possession claims/orders
1. Crawley BC v Ure
notice to quit served by tenants:private and family life and home, right to respect for
1. Crawley BC v Ure
notice to quit served by tenants:Protection from Eviction Act 1977
1. Introduction
notice to quit served by tenants:reasonable recipient test
1. Mannai Investment Co Ltd v Eagle Star Life Assurance Co Ltd
2. Garston v Scottish Widows
notice to quit served by tenants:restraining other tenants
1. Newlon Housing Trust v Al-Sulaimen
2. Bater v Bater; Bater v Greenwich LBC
notice to quit served by tenants:right to buy, extinguishment of
1. Bater v Bater; Bater v Greenwich LBC
notice to quit served by tenants:sale, breach of trusts for
1. Greenwich LBC v McGrady
notice to quit served by tenants:savings clause
1. Fletcher v Brent LBC
notice to quit served by tenants:set aside NTQ, jurisdiction to
1. Bater v Bater; Bater v Greenwich LBC
notice to quit served by tenants:subtenancies, termination of
1. Pennell v Payne
notice to quit served by tenants:termination of tenancies
1. Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Monk
2. Harrow LBC v Johnstone
3. Newlon Housing Trust v Al-Sulaimen
notice to quit served by tenants:trusts, breach of
1. Greenwich LBC v McGrady
notice to quit served by tenants:validity
1. Mannai Investment Co Ltd v Eagle Star Life Assurance Co Ltd
2. Garston v Scottish Widows
3. Fletcher v Brent LBC
notice to quit served by tenants:waiver
1. Hounslow LBC v Pilling
2. Notting Hill Housing Trust v Brackley
notice to quit served by tenants:wrong date
1. Mannai Investment Co Ltd v Eagle Star Life Assurance Co Ltd
2. Fletcher v Brent LBC
nuisance or annoyance
1. Sagvolden v Norway
2. Article 8: Nuisance
3. Băcilă v Romania
4. Bor v Hungary
5. Dubetska v Ukraine
6. Fadeyeva v Russia
7. Gomez v Spain
8. Grimkovskaya v Ukraine
9. Hardy and Maile v UK
10. Hatton and others v UK
11. López Ostra v Spain
12. Maempel v Malta
13. Oluić v Croatia
14. Anti-social behaviour
nuisance or annoyance:abatement notices
1. Budd v Colchester BC
2. R v Bristol CC ex p Everett
3. SFI Group plc v Gosport BC
4. Canterbury CC v Ferris
5. R (Anne) v Test Valley BC
nuisance or annoyance:abatement orders
1. Ashard v Islington LBC
nuisance or annoyance:abusive and menacing language, no orders where
1. Woking BC v Bistram
nuisance or annoyance:access not given to abate nuisance
1. Jones v Walsall MBC
nuisance or annoyance:acquiescence, intentional homelessness and
1. Griffiths v St Helens MBC
2. R v Swansea CC ex p John
nuisance or annoyance:adjoining occupiers
1. Cobstone Investments Ltd v Maxim
nuisance or annoyance:alternative accommodation, not permissible for court to require provision of
1. Darlington BC v Sterling
nuisance or annoyance:anti-social behaviour orders
1. Anti-social behaviour
2. London and Quadrant Housing Trust v Root
3. Manchester CC v Higgins
4. Moat Housing Group South Ltd v Harris and Hartless
nuisance or annoyance:any persons residing with tenants
1. Anti-social behaviour
nuisance or annoyance:appeals
1. CDS Housing v Bellis
2. Matthews v Ahmed
3. Knowsley Housing Trust v Prescott
nuisance or annoyance:arrestable offences
1. Anti-social behaviour
nuisance or annoyance:assured tenancies
1. Anti-social behaviour
2. Raglan Housing Association Ltd v Fairclough
3. Kensington Housing Trust v Borkwood
nuisance or annoyance:barking dogs
1. Budd v Colchester BC
nuisance or annoyance:before tenancy, offences committed before
1. Raglan Housing Association Ltd v Fairclough
nuisance or annoyance:breach of obligations as ground for possession
1. Camden LBC v McBride
2. Kensington and Chelsea RLBC v Simmonds
3. Northampton BC v Lovatt
nuisance or annoyance:building works
1. Guppys (Bridport) Ltd v Brookling
nuisance or annoyance:cannabis, possession of
1. Abrahams v Wilson
nuisance or annoyance:care leavers convicted of criminal offences
1. Greenwich LBC v Grogan
nuisance or annoyance:cats, large number of
1. Harlow DC v Sewell
nuisance or annoyance:children:acquiescence, intentional homelessness and
1. Griffiths v St Helens MBC
nuisance or annoyance:children:imprisonment of child
1. New Charter Housing (North) Ltd v Ashcroft
nuisance or annoyance:children:indifference to effect of behaviour of children
1. Manchester CC v Higgins
nuisance or annoyance:children:intentional homelessness
1. Griffiths v St Helens MBC
nuisance or annoyance:children:racial harassment by children
1. West Kent Housing Association v Davies
nuisance or annoyance:children:reign of terror by children, outright orders where
1. Newcastle upon Tyne CC v Morrison
nuisance or annoyance:children:remorse, outright orders where tenant shows no
1. Manchester CC v Higgins
nuisance or annoyance:children:suspended possession orders
1. Knowsley Housing Trust v McMullen
nuisance or annoyance:closes mind to misconduct, where tenants
1. Portsmouth CC v Bryant
nuisance or annoyance:cockroach infestation
1. Habinteg Housing Association v James
2. Sharpe v Manchester MDC
nuisance or annoyance:contempt, sentencing for
1. Sandwell MBC v Preece
nuisance or annoyance:continuation, likelihood of
1. Accent Peerless Ltd (formerly Surrey Heath Housing Association Ltd) v Kingsdon
nuisance or annoyance:costs
1. R v Dudley Magistrates’ Court ex p Hollis
nuisance or annoyance:criminal offences
1. Raglan Housing Association Ltd v Fairclough
2. Abrahams v Wilson
3. Greenwich LBC v Grogan
4. North Devon Homes Ltd v Batchelor
5. Wandsworth LBC v Webb
nuisance or annoyance:currency of tenancy, not restricted to
1. Raglan Housing Association Ltd v Fairclough
nuisance or annoyance:definition
1. Civil proceedings
nuisance or annoyance:discretion
1. Anti-social behaviour
nuisance or annoyance:disrepair:cockroach infestation
1. Habinteg Housing Association v James
2. Sharpe v Manchester MDC
nuisance or annoyance:disrepair:damages
1. Vergara v Lambeth LBC and Hyde Southbank Homes
nuisance or annoyance:disrepair:exclusive possession
1. Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd
nuisance or annoyance:disrepair:flooding
1. Lambert v Barratt Homes Ltd and Rochdale MBC
nuisance or annoyance:disrepair:normal use of flats
1. Southwark LBC v Mills; Southwark LBC v Tanner; Baxter v Camden LBC
nuisance or annoyance:disrepair:television reception
1. Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd
nuisance or annoyance:dogs, keeping
1. Sheffield CC v Green
2. Sheffield CC v Jepson
nuisance or annoyance:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under:abatement notices
1. Budd v Colchester BC
nuisance or annoyance:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under:access not given to abate nuisance
1. Jones v Walsall MBC
nuisance or annoyance:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under:barking dogs
1. Budd v Colchester BC
nuisance or annoyance:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under:costs
1. R v Dudley Magistrates’ Court ex p Hollis
nuisance or annoyance:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under:noise, acoustic evidence on
1. Lewisham LBC v Hall
nuisance or annoyance:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under:statutory nuisance
1. Criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 and other Acts
2. Cunningham v Birmingham CC
3. Farrar v Dover CC
4. Greater London Council v Tower Hamlets LBC
nuisance or annoyance:evidence:fresh evidence
1. Leeds and Yorkshire Housing Association v Vertigan
nuisance or annoyance:evidence:hearsay
1. Anti-social behaviour (Housing Acts 1985 and 1988)
2. Moat Housing Group South Ltd v Harris and Hartless
nuisance or annoyance:evidence:psychiatric evidence
1. Croydon LBC v Moody
nuisance or annoyance:evidence:undertakings as fresh evidence
1. Leeds and Yorkshire Housing Association v Vertigan
nuisance or annoyance:exceptional circumstances
1. Bristol CC v Mousah
2. Knowsley Housing Trust v McMullen
nuisance or annoyance:exclusive possession
1. Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd
nuisance or annoyance:failure to prevent misconduct
1. Portsmouth CC v Bryant
nuisance or annoyance:flooding
1. Lambert v Barratt Homes Ltd and Rochdale MBC
nuisance or annoyance:forfeiture
1. Courtney Lodge Management Ltd v Blake
nuisance or annoyance:fresh evidence
1. Leeds and Yorkshire Housing Association v Vertigan
nuisance or annoyance:grounds for possession
1. Anti-social behaviour
2. Breach of obligation and anti-social behaviour
3. Accent Peerless Ltd (formerly Surrey Heath Housing Association Ltd) v Kingsdon
4. Barking and Dagenham LBC v Hyatt and Hyatt
5. Bedfordshire Pilgrims Housing Association Ltd v Khan
6. Brent LBC v Doughan
7. Bristol CC v Mousah
8. CDS Housing v Bellis
9. Camden LBC v Gilsenan
10. Canterbury CC v Lowe
11. Castle Vale Housing Action Trust v Gallagher
12. Croydon LBC v Moody
13. Darlington BC v Sterling
14. Greenwich LBC v Grogan
15. Knowsley Housing Trust v McMullen
16. Lambeth LBC v Howard
17. Leeds and Yorkshire Housing Association v Vertigan
18. London and Quadrant Housing Trust v Root
19. Manchester CC v Higgins
20. Matthews v Ahmed
21. New Charter Housing (North) Ltd v Ashcroft
22. Newcastle upon Tyne CC v Morrison
23. North Devon Homes Ltd v Batchelor
24. Norwich CC v Famuyiwa
25. Sheffield CC v Green
26. Sheffield CC v Jepson
27. Sheffield CC v Shaw
28. Solon South West Housing Association Ltd v James
29. Wandsworth LBC v Hargreaves
30. Wandsworth LBC v Webb
31. West Kent Housing Association v Davies
32. Woking BC v Bistram
33. Knowsley Housing Trust v Prescott
34. Sheffield CC v Fletcher
nuisance or annoyance:harassment
1. Kensington Housing Trust v Borkwood
2. Knowsley Housing Trust v McMullen
3. Sheffield CC v Shaw
nuisance or annoyance:hearsay evidence
1. Anti-social behaviour (Housing Acts 1985 and 1988)
2. Solon South West Housing Association Ltd v James
3. Moat Housing Group South Ltd v Harris and Hartless
nuisance or annoyance:heating
1. Greater London Council v Tower Hamlets LBC
nuisance or annoyance:High Court, jurisdiction of
1. Sheffield CC v Fletcher
nuisance or annoyance:homelessness
1. R v Bristol CC ex p Bradic
2. Griffiths v St Helens MBC
3. R v Swansea CC ex p John
4. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p P
5. R v Newham LBC ex p Campbell
nuisance or annoyance:immediate orders where there is there is a lesser alternative, no
1. CDS Housing v Bellis
nuisance or annoyance:immoral or illegal purposes, use of dwelling for
1. Anti-social behaviour
2. Abrahams v Wilson
nuisance or annoyance:imprisonment
1. New Charter Housing (North) Ltd v Ashcroft
nuisance or annoyance:improvements in behaviour, admissibility despite
1. Solon South West Housing Association Ltd v James
nuisance or annoyance:indifference to effect of behaviour of children
1. Manchester CC v Higgins
nuisance or annoyance:inevitability of outright orders
1. Sheffield CC v Fletcher
nuisance or annoyance:infer nuisance, judges can
1. Frederick Platts Co Ltd v Grigor
nuisance or annoyance:injunctions
1. Canterbury CC v Lowe
2. Injunctions against tenants and third parties
3. Manchester CC v Lee
4. Moat Housing Group South Ltd v Harris and Hartless
5. Nottingham CC v Zain (a minor)
6. Sandwell MBC v Preece
7. Stafford BC v Haynes
nuisance or annoyance:intention or motive
1. Kensington Housing Trust v Borkwood
2. Sheffield CC v Green
nuisance or annoyance:intentional homelessness
1. Griffiths v St Helens MBC
2. R v Swansea CC ex p John
3. Mohamed v Westminster CC
nuisance or annoyance:interpretation
1. Harlow DC v Sewell
2. Kensington Housing Trust v Borkwood
nuisance or annoyance:judges, reasonableness as matter for trial
1. Bedfordshire Pilgrims Housing Association Ltd v Khan
nuisance or annoyance:leave, not asking spouses to
1. R v Swansea CC ex p John
nuisance or annoyance:lesser alternatives to possession, absence of
1. CDS Housing v Bellis
nuisance or annoyance:lodgers
1. Anti-social behaviour
nuisance or annoyance:major building works
1. Guppys (Bridport) Ltd v Brookling
nuisance or annoyance:motive or intention to harass
1. Kensington Housing Trust v Borkwood
nuisance or annoyance:move out, disproportionate to make orders where perpetrators to
1. Castle Vale Housing Action Trust v Gallagher
nuisance or annoyance:neighbours:adjoining occupiers as being neighbouring occupiers
1. Cobstone Investments Ltd v Maxim
nuisance or annoyance:neighbours:injunctions
1. Manchester CC v Lee
nuisance or annoyance:neighbours:past obsessions with neighbours
1. Knowsley Housing Trust v McMullen
nuisance or annoyance:neighbours:reasonableness of possession orders
1. Knowsley Housing Trust v McMullen
nuisance or annoyance:noise
1. Lewisham LBC v Hall
nuisance or annoyance:normal use of flats
1. Southwark LBC v Mills; Southwark LBC v Tanner; Baxter v Camden LBC
nuisance or annoyance:notice, orders for application on
1. Knowsley Housing Trust v McMullen
nuisance or annoyance:one-off incidents, refusal of orders for
1. Wandsworth LBC v Hargreaves
nuisance or annoyance:ordinary use of premises
1. Sampson v Hodson-Pressinger
nuisance or annoyance:past obsessions with neighbours
1. Knowsley Housing Trust v McMullen
nuisance or annoyance:perpetrator leaving premises
1. London and Quadrant Housing Trust v Root
nuisance or annoyance:petrol bombs
1. Wandsworth LBC v Hargreaves
nuisance or annoyance:pointless, judges viewing suspended orders as
1. Norwich CC v Famuyiwa
nuisance or annoyance:possession orders:abusive and menacing language, no orders where
1. Woking BC v Bistram
nuisance or annoyance:possession orders:anti-social behaviour orders
1. London and Quadrant Housing Trust v Root
2. Manchester CC v Higgins
nuisance or annoyance:possession orders:criminal offences
1. North Devon Homes Ltd v Batchelor
nuisance or annoyance:possession orders:dogs, intention to continue keeping
1. Sheffield CC v Green
nuisance or annoyance:possession orders:drugs convictions
1. North Devon Homes Ltd v Batchelor
2. Knowsley Housing Trust v Prescott
nuisance or annoyance:possession orders:hearsay
1. Solon South West Housing Association Ltd v James
nuisance or annoyance:possession orders:High Court, jurisdiction of
1. Sheffield CC v Fletcher
nuisance or annoyance:possession orders:inevitability of outright orders
1. Sheffield CC v Fletcher
nuisance or annoyance:possession orders:lesser alternatives, absence of
1. CDS Housing v Bellis
nuisance or annoyance:possession orders:one-off incidents, refusal for
1. Wandsworth LBC v Hargreaves
nuisance or annoyance:possession orders:perpetrator leaving premises
1. London and Quadrant Housing Trust v Root
nuisance or annoyance:possession orders:postponement
1. Knowsley Housing Trust v Prescott
2. Manchester CC v Finn
nuisance or annoyance:possession orders:pretexts for gaining possession, where incidents are
1. Matthews v Ahmed
nuisance or annoyance:possession orders:private and family life, right to respect for
1. Castle Vale Housing Action Trust v Gallagher
nuisance or annoyance:possession orders:proportionality
1. Castle Vale Housing Action Trust v Gallagher
nuisance or annoyance:possession orders:racial harassment by children
1. West Kent Housing Association v Davies
nuisance or annoyance:possession orders:reasonableness
1. Breach of obligation and anti-social behaviour
2. Accent Peerless Ltd (formerly Surrey Heath Housing Association Ltd) v Kingsdon
3. Barking and Dagenham LBC v Hyatt and Hyatt
4. Bedfordshire Pilgrims Housing Association Ltd v Khan
5. Brent LBC v Doughan
6. Bristol CC v Mousah
7. CDS Housing v Bellis
8. Camden LBC v Gilsenan
9. Canterbury CC v Lowe
10. Castle Vale Housing Action Trust v Gallagher
11. Croydon LBC v Moody
12. Darlington BC v Sterling
13. Greenwich LBC v Grogan
14. Knowsley Housing Trust v McMullen
15. Lambeth LBC v Howard
16. Leeds and Yorkshire Housing Association v Vertigan
17. London and Quadrant Housing Trust v Root
18. Manchester CC v Higgins
19. Matthews v Ahmed
20. New Charter Housing (North) Ltd v Ashcroft
21. Newcastle upon Tyne CC v Morrison
22. North Devon Homes Ltd v Batchelor
23. Norwich CC v Famuyiwa
24. Sheffield CC v Green
25. Sheffield CC v Jepson
26. Sheffield CC v Shaw
27. Solon South West Housing Association Ltd v James
28. Wandsworth LBC v Hargreaves
29. Wandsworth LBC v Webb
30. West Kent Housing Association v Davies
31. Woking BC v Bistram
32. Knowsley Housing Trust v Prescott
33. Sheffield CC v Fletcher
nuisance or annoyance:possession orders:rehearings
1. Sheffield CC v Jepson
nuisance or annoyance:possession orders:remorse, outright orders where tenant shows no
1. Manchester CC v Higgins
nuisance or annoyance:possession orders:suspended possession orders
1. Portsmouth CC v Bryant
2. Canterbury CC v Lowe
3. Knowsley Housing Trust v McMullen
4. Leeds and Yorkshire Housing Association v Vertigan
5. New Charter Housing (North) Ltd v Ashcroft
6. Norwich CC v Famuyiwa
nuisance or annoyance:possession orders:wrong in principle, suspension not
1. Portsmouth CC v Bryant
nuisance or annoyance:postponement of orders
1. Knowsley Housing Trust v Prescott
2. Manchester CC v Finn
nuisance or annoyance:pretexts for gaining possession, where incidents are
1. Matthews v Ahmed
nuisance or annoyance:priority need
1. R v Bristol CC ex p Bradic
nuisance or annoyance:private and family life, right to respect for
1. Castle Vale Housing Action Trust v Gallagher
nuisance or annoyance:proportionality
1. Castle Vale Housing Action Trust v Gallagher
nuisance or annoyance:prosecutions, wrongly taking into account unsuccessful
1. Wandsworth LBC v Webb
nuisance or annoyance:psychiatric evidence
1. Croydon LBC v Moody
nuisance or annoyance:public interest
1. Greenwich LBC v Grogan
nuisance or annoyance:public nuisance
1. Nottingham CC v Zain (a minor)
nuisance or annoyance:racial harassment by children
1. West Kent Housing Association v Davies
nuisance or annoyance:range of orders open to judge, suspension within
1. Leeds and Yorkshire Housing Association v Vertigan
nuisance or annoyance:reasonableness of possession orders
1. Breach of obligation and anti-social behaviour
2. Accent Peerless Ltd (formerly Surrey Heath Housing Association Ltd) v Kingsdon
3. Barking and Dagenham LBC v Hyatt and Hyatt
4. Bedfordshire Pilgrims Housing Association Ltd v Khan
5. Brent LBC v Doughan
6. Bristol CC v Mousah
7. CDS Housing v Bellis
8. Camden LBC v Gilsenan
9. Canterbury CC v Lowe
10. Castle Vale Housing Action Trust v Gallagher
11. Croydon LBC v Moody
12. Darlington BC v Sterling
13. Greenwich LBC v Grogan
14. Knowsley Housing Trust v McMullen
15. Lambeth LBC v Howard
16. Leeds and Yorkshire Housing Association v Vertigan
17. London and Quadrant Housing Trust v Root
18. Manchester CC v Higgins
19. Matthews v Ahmed
20. New Charter Housing (North) Ltd v Ashcroft
21. Newcastle upon Tyne CC v Morrison
22. North Devon Homes Ltd v Batchelor
23. Norwich CC v Famuyiwa
24. Sheffield CC v Green
25. Sheffield CC v Jepson
26. Sheffield CC v Shaw
27. Solon South West Housing Association Ltd v James
28. Wandsworth LBC v Hargreaves
29. Wandsworth LBC v Webb
30. West Kent Housing Association v Davies
31. Woking BC v Bistram
32. Knowsley Housing Trust v Prescott
33. Sheffield CC v Fletcher
nuisance or annoyance:regret, inappropriate where tenants show no
1. New Charter Housing (North) Ltd v Ashcroft
nuisance or annoyance:rehearings
1. Sheffield CC v Jepson
nuisance or annoyance:rehouse tenants, judges have no power to order councils to
1. Watford BC v Simpson
nuisance or annoyance:reign of terror by children, outright orders where
1. Newcastle upon Tyne CC v Morrison
nuisance or annoyance:remorse, outright orders where tenant shows no
1. Manchester CC v Higgins
nuisance or annoyance:Rent Act tenancies
1. Anti-social behaviour
2. Abrahams v Wilson
3. Cobstone Investments Ltd v Maxim
4. Frederick Platts Co Ltd v Grigor
nuisance or annoyance:secure tenancies
1. Anti-social behaviour
2. Anti-social behaviour (Housing Acts 1985 and 1988)
3. Croydon LBC v Crawford
4. Harlow DC v Sewell
5. Kensington Housing Trust v Oliver
6. Portsmouth CC v Bryant
7. Watford BC v Simpson
8. Sheffield CC v Fletcher
nuisance or annoyance:sensitive tenants next to each other, placing
1. Brent LBC v Doughan
nuisance or annoyance:serious harassment of young girls, refusal of outright orders despite
1. Sheffield CC v Shaw
nuisance or annoyance:setting aside possession orders
1. Sheffield CC v Fletcher
nuisance or annoyance:settled accommodation and intentional homelessness
1. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p P
2. R v Newham LBC ex p Campbell
nuisance or annoyance:spouses to leave, not asking
1. R v Swansea CC ex p John
nuisance or annoyance:statutory nuisance
1. Criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 and other Acts
2. Cunningham v Birmingham CC
3. Farrar v Dover CC
4. Greater London Council v Tower Hamlets LBC
nuisance or annoyance:subtenancies
1. Cornillie v Saha and Bradford and Bingley Building Society
2. Anti-social behaviour
nuisance or annoyance:suspended possession orders
1. Portsmouth CC v Bryant
nuisance or annoyance:suspended possession orders:control of children
1. Knowsley Housing Trust v McMullen
nuisance or annoyance:suspended possession orders:exceptional circumstances
1. Knowsley Housing Trust v McMullen
nuisance or annoyance:suspended possession orders:imprisonment
1. New Charter Housing (North) Ltd v Ashcroft
nuisance or annoyance:suspended possession orders:injunctions, availability of
1. Canterbury CC v Lowe
nuisance or annoyance:suspended possession orders:notice, orders for application on
1. Knowsley Housing Trust v McMullen
nuisance or annoyance:suspended possession orders:pointless, judges viewing suspension as
1. Norwich CC v Famuyiwa
nuisance or annoyance:suspended possession orders:range of orders open to judge, within
1. Leeds and Yorkshire Housing Association v Vertigan
nuisance or annoyance:suspended possession orders:regret, inappropriate where tenants show no
1. New Charter Housing (North) Ltd v Ashcroft
nuisance or annoyance:suspended possession orders:wrong in principle, suspension not
1. Portsmouth CC v Bryant
nuisance or annoyance:suspended sentences, activation of
1. Sandwell MBC v Preece
nuisance or annoyance:telephone calls
1. Khorasandjian v Bush
nuisance or annoyance:television reception
1. Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd
nuisance or annoyance:terrorised, where neighbours are
1. Wear Valley DC v Robson
nuisance or annoyance:undertakings
1. Kensington Housing Trust v Oliver
2. Leeds and Yorkshire Housing Association v Vertigan
nuisance or annoyance:unsuccessful prosecutions, taking into account
1. Wandsworth LBC v Webb
nuisance or annoyance:urban living, conditions of
1. Brent LBC v Doughan
nuisance or annoyance:vandalism
1. R v Gloucester CC ex p Miles
nuisance or annoyance:very serious breaches
1. Bristol CC v Mousah
nuisance or annoyance:visitors, conduct of
1. Camden LBC v Gilsenan
nuisance or annoyance:warrants
1. Knowsley Housing Trust v McMullen
occupancy vouchers as possessions
1. Mirzayev v Azerbaijan
occupation as a residence:appeals
1. Richards v Green
occupation as a residence:armed conflicts, absences due to
1. Wigley v Leigh
occupation as a residence:assured tenancies
1. Occupation as a residence; Rent Act 1977 s2(1)(a)
occupation as a residence:family elsewhere, tenants living with
1. Regalian Securities Ltd v Scheuer
occupation as a residence:intention to return
1. Brickfield Properties Ltd v Hughes
2. Tickner v Hearn
occupation as a residence:long periods, absence for
1. Occupation as a residence; Rent Act 1977 s2(1)(a)
2. Bevington v Crawford
3. Brickfield Properties Ltd v Hughes
4. Gofor Investments v Roberts
5. Prince v Robinson
occupation as a residence:matrimonial home, wife occupying premises which were not
1. Hall v King
occupation as a residence:mental disabilities, persons with
1. Tickner v Hearn
occupation as a residence:neighbours, tenants driven out by
1. Stephens v Kerr
occupation as a residence:nights a week, use only for several
1. Blanway Investments Ltd v Lynch
occupation as a residence:possession claims
1. Carphone Warehouse UK Ltd v Malekout
2. Moreland Properties (UK) Ltd v Dhokia
occupation as a residence:prisoners’ wife leaving house with furniture
1. Brown v Brash
occupation as a residence:secure tenancies
1. Occupation as a residence; Rent Act 1977 s2(1)(a)
occupation as a residence:sleep, use of flat merely for
1. Hampstead Way Investments Ltd v Lewis-Weare
occupation as a residence:subtenants, defence of possession claims by
1. Moreland Properties (UK) Ltd v Dhokia
occupation as a residence:temporary absences
1. Occupation as a residence; Rent Act 1977 s2(1)(a)
2. Bevington v Crawford
3. Brickfield Properties Ltd v Hughes
4. Gofor Investments v Roberts
5. Prince v Robinson
6. Richards v Green
7. Wigley v Leigh
occupation as a residence:tuberculosis, due to
1. Wigley v Leigh
occupy, right to:harassment and illegal eviction, damages for
1. King v Jackson
occupy, right to:homelessness, definition of
1. R (B) v Southwark LBC
2. Rights of occupation: s175(1)
3. Abdullah v Westminster CC
4. Fletcher v Brent LBC
5. R (Sacupima) v Newham LBC
6. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p O’Sullivan
7. R v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p Minton
occupy, right to:notice to quit by one spouse
1. Fletcher v Brent LBC
occupy, right to:prison cells
1. R (B) v Southwark LBC
omissions
1. Tsfayo v UK
2. Deliberate act or omission
only or principal home, occupation as
1. Occupation as only or principal home: Housing Act 1985 s81 and Housing Act 1988 s1(1)(b); Prohibition against subletting: Housing Act 1985 s93 and Housing Act 1988 s15A
2. Brent LBC v Cronin
3. Crawley BC v Sawyer
4. Gay v Sheeran
5. Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Clarke
6. Hussey v Camden LBC
7. Jennings v Epping Forest DC
8. Lambeth LBC v Vandra
9. Merton LBC v Salama
10. Muir Group Housing Association Ltd v Thornley
11. Sutton LBC v Swann
12. Ujima Housing Association v Ansah
13. Amoah v Barking and Dagenham LBC
14. Waltham Forest CBHA v Fanning
15. Notting Hill Housing Trust v Etoria
16. McLoughlin’s Curator Bonis v Motherwell DC
oral hearings
1. Lomotey v Enfield LBC
orally, tenancies granted
1. Requirements for assured shorthold tenancy
ouster injunctions, breach of
1. Leicester CC v Lewis
out of area placements:exceptional circumstances
1. R (W) v Sheffield CC
out of area placements:homelessness
1. Suitability and out of area placements
2. R (Yumsak) v Enfield LBC
3. R (W) v Sheffield CC
out of area placements:private and family life, right to respect for
1. R (Yumsak) v Enfield LBC
overcrowding :abroad, accommodation situated
1. Osei v Southwark LBC
overcrowding :continued occupation, reasonableness of
1. Elrify v Westminster CC
2. Harouki v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
3. R v Westminster CC ex p Alouat
4. Sabah Mohamoud v Greenwich LBC
overcrowding :criminal offences
1. Overcrowding
overcrowding :evidence
1. Henry Smith’s Charity Trustees v Bartosiak-Jentys
overcrowding :general assertions about overcrowding in district
1. Sabah Mohamoud v Greenwich LBC
overcrowding :grounds for possession
1. Overcrowding
overcrowding :homelessness
1. Elrify v Westminster CC
2. Harouki v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
3. R v Westminster CC ex p Alouat
4. Sabah Mohamoud v Greenwich LBC
5. Osei v Southwark LBC
6. Mohamed v Westminster CC
overcrowding :non-statutory overcrowding
1. R v Westminster CC ex p Alouat
overcrowding :possession, ground for
1. Overcrowding
overcrowding :Rent Act tenancies
1. Overcrowding
overcrowding :secure tenancies
1. Overcrowding
2. Overcrowding (Rent Act 1977 s101)
3. Henry Smith’s Charity Trustees v Bartosiak-Jentys
overcrowding :settled accommodation and intentional homelessness
1. Mohamed v Westminster CC
overcrowding :state of affairs, overcrowding as a
1. Henry Smith’s Charity Trustees v Bartosiak-Jentys
overcrowding :test
1. Elrify v Westminster CC
overflows
1. Hawkins v Dhawan
owner-occupiers and grounds for possession
1. Owner-occupiers
owner-occupiers and grounds for possession:assured tenancies
1. Owner-occupiers
2. Returning owner-occupier (Housing Act 1988 Sch 2 Ground 1)
3. Boyle v Verrall
4. Hegab v Shamash
5. Mustafa v Ruddock
owner-occupiers and grounds for possession:landlords or members of family, premises required for
1. Premises required for landlord or member of family (Rent Act 1977 Sch 15 Case 9)
2. Alexander v Mohamadzadeh
3. Amaddio v Dalton
4. Baker v MacIver
5. Bassett v Fraser
6. Bostock v Tacher de la Pagerie
7. Coombes v Parry
8. Evans v Engelson
9. Ghelani v Bowie
10. Hodges v Blee
11. Kidder v Birch
12. Manaton v Edwards
13. Mansukhani v Sharkey
owner-occupiers and grounds for possession:Rent Act tenancies
1. Owner-occupiers
2. Premises required for landlord or member of family (Rent Act 1977 Sch 15 Case 9)
3. Alexander v Mohamadzadeh
4. Amaddio v Dalton
5. Baker v MacIver
6. Bassett v Fraser
7. Bostock v Tacher de la Pagerie
8. Coombes v Parry
9. Evans v Engelson
10. Ghelani v Bowie
11. Hodges v Blee
12. Kidder v Birch
13. Manaton v Edwards
14. Mansukhani v Sharkey
owner-occupiers and grounds for possession:returning owner-occupiers
1. Returning owner-occupier (Housing Act 1988 Sch 2 Ground 1)
2. Boyle v Verrall
3. Hegab v Shamash
4. Mustafa v Ruddock
part of premises, occupation of :business premises
1. Broadway Investments Hackney Ltd v Grant
2. Pulleng v Curran
part of premises, occupation of :joint tenancies
1. Gay v Sheeran
part of premises, occupation of :non-use of business part
1. Pulleng v Curran
part of premises, occupation of :security of tenure
1. Broadway Investments Hackney Ltd v Grant
part of premises, occupation of :subtenancies
1. Merton LBC v Salama
part of premises, occupation of :suitable alternative accommodation
1. Mykolyshyn v Noah
2. Yoland Ltd v Reddington
patch repairs to roofs
1. Dame Margaret Hungerford Charity Trustees v Beazeley
2. Murray v Birmingham CC
paths:dangerous paths
1. Lips v Older
paths:negligence
1. Lips v Older
paths:rear paths, implied term to maintain
1. King v South Northamptonshire DC
paving slabs
1. Boldack (minor) v East Lindsey DC
peaceful enjoyment of possession:Article 1 Protocol 1
1. Brezovec v Croatia
2. Bukovčanová v Slovakia
3. Gauci v Malta
4. Kunic v Croatia
5. Spath Holme Ltd v UK
6. Tuleshov v Russia
7. Urbárska Obec Trencianske Biskupice v Slovakia
8. Velikovi v Bulgaria
9. Veselinski v Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
10. Vijatović v Croatia
peaceful enjoyment of possessions:Communist regime, restoration of property confiscated during
1. Velikovi v Bulgaria
peaceful enjoyment of possessions:compulsory letting at low rent
1. Urbárska Obec Trencianske Biskupice v Slovakia
peaceful enjoyment of possessions:expropriation, compensation for
1. Velikovi v Bulgaria
peaceful enjoyment of possessions:fair hearing, right to a
1. Mirzayev v Azerbaijan
peaceful enjoyment of possessions:good faith, acquisition in
1. Velikovi v Bulgaria
peaceful enjoyment of possessions:legitimate expectations
1. Veselinski v Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
peaceful enjoyment of possessions:mortgage possession proceedings
1. Barclays Bank v Alcorn
peaceful enjoyment of possessions:occupancy vouchers
1. Mirzayev v Azerbaijan
peaceful enjoyment of possessions:proportionality
1. Velikovi v Bulgaria
peaceful enjoyment of possessions:public interest
1. Velikovi v Bulgaria
peaceful enjoyment of possessions:purchase flats, claims to
1. Veselinski v Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
peaceful enjoyment of possessions:rent control
1. Urbárska Obec Trencianske Biskupice v Slovakia
penal notices
1. Trustee in Bankruptcy of Canty v Canty
2. R v Wandsworth County Court ex p Munn
pending appeals, discretion to accommodate
1. Brookes v Croydon LBC
2. Francis v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
3. Lewis v Havering LBC
4. R v Brighton and Hove Council ex p Nacion
pending appeals, discretion to accommodate:county courts
1. Francis v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
pending appeals, discretion to accommodate:discharge of duty
1. Brookes v Croydon LBC
2. Francis v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
3. Lewis v Havering LBC
4. R v Brighton and Hove Council ex p Nacion
pending appeals, discretion to accommodate:grounds
1. Lewis v Havering LBC
pending appeals, discretion to accommodate:homelessness
1. Brookes v Croydon LBC
2. Francis v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
3. Lewis v Havering LBC
4. R v Brighton and Hove Council ex p Nacion
pending appeals, discretion to accommodate:judicial review
1. Francis v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
pending appeals, discretion to accommodate:practicalities of second appeals
1. Brookes v Croydon LBC
pending appeals, discretion to accommodate:second appeals, refusal of
1. Brookes v Croydon LBC
pending appeals, discretion to accommodate:transfer to county courts
1. Francis v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
pending decisions, duty to accommodate:homelessness
1. Mohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
pending decisions, duty to accommodate:local connection referrals
1. Mohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
pending reviews, discretion to accommodate
1. R v Camden LBC ex p Mohammed
2. R v Newham LBC ex p Lumley
3. R (Abdi) v Lambeth LBC
4. R (Antoine) v Reigate and Banstead DC and First Secretary of State
5. R (Araya) v Leeds CC
6. R (Hassan) v Croydon LBC
7. R (Paul-Coker) v Southwark LBC
pending reviews, discretion to accommodate:Chagos Islanders
1. R (Antoine) v Reigate and Banstead DC and First Secretary of State
pending reviews, discretion to accommodate:Children Act duties, consideration of
1. R (Hassan) v Croydon LBC
pending reviews, discretion to accommodate:decisions unlawful, where original
1. R v Newham LBC ex p Lumley
pending reviews, discretion to accommodate:discharge of duty
1. R v Camden LBC ex p Mohammed
2. R v Newham LBC ex p Lumley
3. R (Abdi) v Lambeth LBC
4. R (Antoine) v Reigate and Banstead DC and First Secretary of State
5. R (Araya) v Leeds CC
6. R (Hassan) v Croydon LBC
7. R (Paul-Coker) v Southwark LBC
pending reviews, discretion to accommodate:fairness
1. R (Abdi) v Lambeth LBC
pending reviews, discretion to accommodate:guidance
1. R v Camden LBC ex p Mohammed
pending reviews, discretion to accommodate:habitual residence
1. R (Antoine) v Reigate and Banstead DC and First Secretary of State
pending reviews, discretion to accommodate:homelessness
1. Mohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
2. R v Camden LBC ex p Mohammed
3. R v Newham LBC ex p Lumley
4. R (Abdi) v Lambeth LBC
5. R (Antoine) v Reigate and Banstead DC and First Secretary of State
6. R (Araya) v Leeds CC
7. R (Hassan) v Croydon LBC
8. R (Paul-Coker) v Southwark LBC
pending reviews, discretion to accommodate:lip service paid to Mohammed principles
1. R (Paul-Coker) v Southwark LBC
pending reviews, discretion to accommodate:local connection and referral
1. Mohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
pending reviews, discretion to accommodate:principles
1. R (Paul-Coker) v Southwark LBC
pending reviews, discretion to accommodate:requests made, no duty until
1. R v Newham LBC ex p Lumley
pending reviews, discretion to accommodate:short notice of requirement to move
1. R (Araya) v Leeds CC
permanent accommodation :landlords or members of family, premises required for
1. Naish v Curzon
permanent accommodation :legitimate expectations
1. R (Bibi (No 1) and Al-Nashed) v Newham LBC
permanent accommodation :promises
1. R (Bibi (No 1) and Al-Nashed) v Newham LBC
permanent accommodation :rent arrears, persons with
1. R v Newham LBC ex p Miah (Askir)
personal circumstances, consideration of :allocation
1. R v Canterbury CC ex p Gillespie
personal circumstances, consideration of :continued occupation, reasonableness of
1. Noh v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
personal circumstances, consideration of :Gypsies and Travellers
1. R v Wolverhampton MBC ex p Dunne
personal circumstances, consideration of :homelessness
1. Noh v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
2. R v Brent LBC ex p Omar
personal circumstances, consideration of :interim possession orders
1. R v Wolverhampton MBC ex p Dunne
personal circumstances, consideration of :suitability of accommodation
1. R v Brent LBC ex p Omar
2. R v Newham LBC ex p Ojuri (No 3)
personal injury:burns from hot pipes
1. Boateng v Camden LBC
personal injury:children
1. Conroy v Hire Token Ltd
personal injury:coughs and colds
1. Conroy v Hire Token Ltd
personal injury:Defective Premises Act 1972
1. Defective Premises Act 1972
personal injury:disrepair
1. Millington v Islington LBC
2. Stevens v Blaenau Gwent CBC
3. Lavimizadeh v Lambeth LBC
4. Conroy v Hire Token Ltd
personal injury:time limits, extension of
1. Millington v Islington LBC
personal injury:windows:broken glass in
1. Lavimizadeh v Lambeth LBC
personal injury:windows:locks, injury to children where there are no
1. Stevens v Blaenau Gwent CBC
personal representatives
1. Patel v Patel
petrol bombs
1. Wandsworth LBC v Hargreaves
physical signs of continued occupation
1. Crawley BC v Sawyer
pipes:burns caused by hot pipes
1. Boateng v Camden LBC
pipes:burst pipes
1. Passley v Wandsworth LBC
pipes:frozen pipes
1. Stockley v Knowsley MBC
pipes:lagging
1. Wycombe Area Health Authority v Barnett
pipes:overflow
1. Hawkins v Dhawan
planning
1. Kunic v Croatia
2. Billson v Residential Apartments Ltd (No 2)
plaster
1. Hussein v Mehlman
2. Grand v Gill
3. Staves v Leeds CC
points
1. R (Lin) v Barnet LBC
police:domestic violence, seeking protection from
1. R v Croydon LBC ex p Toth
police:duty of value
1. Cowan v Chief Constable for Avon and Somerset Constabulary
police:protection from violence, seeking
1. R v Croydon LBC ex p Toth
police:rent and rate free accommodation
1. Holmes v South Yorkshire Police Authority
Poor Laws
1. Introduction
positive obligation:article 8
1. Bah v UK
2. Chapman v UK
3. Mazari v Italy
4. O’Rourke v UK
5. X v FRG
6. X, Y & Z v United Kingdom
Possession: deprivation of, Article 1 Protocol 1
1. JA Pye (Oxford) Ltd v United Kingdom
2. James v UK
3. Medvedev v Russia
Possession: enforcement, Article 1 Protocol 1
1. Kletsova v Russia
2. Krestyaninovy v Russia
3. Malinovskiy v Russia
Possession: enforcement, delay in, Article 1 Protocol 1
1. Palumbo v Italy
Possession: property as, First Protocol Art 1
1. Article 1 of the First Protocol: Protection of property
Possession: property rights, Article 1 Protocol 1
1. SL and JL v Croatia
Possession: protection of property, Article 1 Protocol 1
1. Mellacher v Austria
possession orders, enforcement: Article 8
1. Budimir v Croatia
possession orders, enforcement:article 8
1. Surugiu v Romania
2. Belchikova v Russia
3. Bjedov v Croatia
4. Brežec v Croatia
5. Buckland v UK
6. Connors v UK
7. Ćosić v Croatia
8. Gustovarac v Croatia
9. Horie v UK
10. Kay v UK
11. Lemo and others v Croatia
12. McCann v UK
13. Office public d’habitation de la Ville de Paris v Yedei
14. Orlić v Croatia
15. Paulić v Croatia
16. Pinnock and Walker v UK
17. Stanková v Slovakia
18. Tuleshov v Russia
19. Velosa Barretto v Portugal
20. Wood v UK
21. Yordanova and others v Bulgaria
22. Zehentner v Austria
23. Zrilić v Croatia
possession orders, enforcement:Equality Act 2010
1. Equality Act 2010
possession orders, enforcement:failure to comply with possession orders
1. Tuohy v Bell
possession orders, enforcement:fair hearing, right to a
1. Palumbo v Italy
2. Panteleeva v Ukraine
3. R (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset Police
possession orders, enforcement:false statements
1. Tenancy obtained by false statement
2. Lewisham LBC v Adeyemi/Lewisham LBC v Akinsola
3. North Herts DC v Carthy
4. Rushcliffe BC v Watson
5. Shrewsbury and Atcham BC v Evans
6. Southwark LBC v Erekin
possession orders, enforcement:formalities, not merits, consideration of
1. R v Wolverhampton MBC ex p Dunne
possession orders, enforcement:gardens, deterioration of
1. Holloway v Povey
possession orders, enforcement:gratifying wishes, reasonableness of
1. Shrimpton v Rabbits
possession orders, enforcement:Gypsies and Travellers
1. R v Wealden DC ex p Wales; R v Lincolnshire CC ex p Atkinson
2. R v Wolverhampton MBC ex p Dunne
3. R (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset Police
4. Shropshire CC v Wynne
5. Ward v Hillingdon LBC
possession orders, enforcement:hearsay
1. Solon South West Housing Association Ltd v James
possession orders, enforcement:homelessness
1. Green and Coyne v Croydon LBC
possession orders, enforcement:humanitarian considerations
1. R v Wealden DC ex p Wales; R v Lincolnshire CC ex p Atkinson
possession orders, enforcement:inhuman or degrading treatment
1. R (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset Police
possession orders, enforcement:interim orders
1. Interim possession orders and removal directions
2. Metropolitan Housing Trust v Ali and Persons Unknown
3. R v Wealden DC ex p Wales; R v Lincolnshire CC ex p Atkinson
4. R v Wolverhampton MBC ex p Dunne
5. R (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset Police
6. Shropshire CC v Wynne
7. Ward v Hillingdon LBC
possession orders, enforcement:joint borrowers
1. Albany Home Loans Ltd v Massey
possession orders, enforcement:judgments, references to reasonableness in
1. Manchester CC v Green
possession orders, enforcement:judicial sale
1. Zehentner v Austria
possession orders, enforcement:legitimate aim
1. Velosa Barretto v Portugal
possession orders, enforcement:lesser alternatives, absence of
1. CDS Housing v Bellis
possession orders, enforcement:mortgage possession proceedings
1. Abbey National v Gibson
possession orders, enforcement:mortgages
1. Wood v UK
possession orders, enforcement:necessary in a democratic society
1. Stanková v Slovakia
2. Manchester CC v Pinnock
possession orders, enforcement:new orders for possession, grant of
1. Manchester CC v Pinnock (No 2)
possession orders, enforcement:notice to quit
1. Crawley BC v Ure
possession orders, enforcement:nuisance and annoyance
1. London and Quadrant Housing Trust v Root
2. Manchester CC v Higgins
3. Matthews v Ahmed
possession orders, enforcement:nuisance and annoyance:abusive and menacing language, no orders where
1. Woking BC v Bistram
possession orders, enforcement:nuisance and annoyance:anti-social behaviour orders
1. London and Quadrant Housing Trust v Root
2. Manchester CC v Higgins
possession orders, enforcement:nuisance and annoyance:criminal offences
1. North Devon Homes Ltd v Batchelor
possession orders, enforcement:nuisance and annoyance:dogs, intention to continue keeping
1. Sheffield CC v Green
possession orders, enforcement:nuisance and annoyance:drugs convictions
1. North Devon Homes Ltd v Batchelor
2. Knowsley Housing Trust v Prescott
possession orders, enforcement:nuisance and annoyance:hearsay
1. Solon South West Housing Association Ltd v James
possession orders, enforcement:nuisance and annoyance:High Court, jurisdiction of
1. Sheffield CC v Fletcher
possession orders, enforcement:nuisance and annoyance:inevitability of outright orders
1. Sheffield CC v Fletcher
possession orders, enforcement:nuisance and annoyance:lesser alternatives, absence of
1. CDS Housing v Bellis
possession orders, enforcement:nuisance and annoyance:one-off incidents, refusal for
1. Wandsworth LBC v Hargreaves
possession orders, enforcement:nuisance and annoyance:perpetrator leaving premises
1. London and Quadrant Housing Trust v Root
possession orders, enforcement:nuisance and annoyance:postponement
1. Knowsley Housing Trust v Prescott
possession orders, enforcement:nuisance and annoyance:pretexts for gaining possession, where incidents are
1. Matthews v Ahmed
possession orders, enforcement:nuisance and annoyance:private and family life, right to respect for
1. Castle Vale Housing Action Trust v Gallagher
possession orders, enforcement:nuisance and annoyance:proportionality
1. Castle Vale Housing Action Trust v Gallagher
possession orders, enforcement:nuisance and annoyance:racial harassment by children
1. West Kent Housing Association v Davies
possession orders, enforcement:nuisance and annoyance:reasonableness
1. Breach of obligation and anti-social behaviour
2. Accent Peerless Ltd (formerly Surrey Heath Housing Association Ltd) v Kingsdon
3. Barking and Dagenham LBC v Hyatt and Hyatt
4. Bedfordshire Pilgrims Housing Association Ltd v Khan
5. Brent LBC v Doughan
6. Bristol CC v Mousah
7. CDS Housing v Bellis
8. Camden LBC v Gilsenan
9. Canterbury CC v Lowe
10. Castle Vale Housing Action Trust v Gallagher
11. Croydon LBC v Moody
12. Darlington BC v Sterling
13. Greenwich LBC v Grogan
14. Knowsley Housing Trust v McMullen
15. Lambeth LBC v Howard
16. Leeds and Yorkshire Housing Association v Vertigan
17. London and Quadrant Housing Trust v Root
18. Manchester CC v Higgins
19. Matthews v Ahmed
20. New Charter Housing (North) Ltd v Ashcroft
21. Newcastle upon Tyne CC v Morrison
22. North Devon Homes Ltd v Batchelor
23. Norwich CC v Famuyiwa
24. Sheffield CC v Green
25. Sheffield CC v Jepson
26. Sheffield CC v Shaw
27. Solon South West Housing Association Ltd v James
28. Wandsworth LBC v Hargreaves
29. Wandsworth LBC v Webb
30. West Kent Housing Association v Davies
31. Woking BC v Bistram
32. Knowsley Housing Trust v Prescott
33. Sheffield CC v Fletcher
possession orders, enforcement:nuisance and annoyance:rehearings
1. Sheffield CC v Jepson
possession orders, enforcement:nuisance and annoyance:remorse, outright orders where tenant shows no
1. Manchester CC v Higgins
possession orders, enforcement:nuisance and annoyance:wrong in principle, suspension not
1. Portsmouth CC v Bryant
possession orders, enforcement:nullity, warrants issued prior to date of possession a
1. Tuohy v Bell
possession orders, enforcement:one-off incidents
1. Wandsworth LBC v Hargreaves
possession orders, enforcement:outright orders:appeals, no compelling reason for second
1. Plymouth CC v Hoskin
possession orders, enforcement:outright orders:county court, continuing remedies in
1. Plymouth CC v Hoskin
possession orders, enforcement:outright orders:variation of postponed orders
1. Manchester CC v Finn
possession orders, enforcement:payment of arrears, setting aside warrants after
1. Merton LBC v Hashmi
possession orders, enforcement:penal notices
1. Trustee in Bankruptcy of Canty v Canty
possession orders, enforcement:personal circumstances after making orders, enquiries into
1. R v Wolverhampton MBC ex p Dunne
possession orders, enforcement:postponement
1. Boyland & Sons Ltd v Rand
possession orders, enforcement:postponement:appeals
1. Knowsley Housing Trust v Prescott
possession orders, enforcement:postponement:breach
1. Wandsworth LBC v Whibley
possession orders, enforcement:postponement:date for possession
1. Austin v Southwark LBC
2. Wandsworth LBC v Whibley
possession orders, enforcement:postponement:death, due to
1. Austin v Southwark LBC
possession orders, enforcement:postponement:enforcement
1. Boyland & Sons Ltd v Rand
possession orders, enforcement:postponement:nuisance and annoyance
1. Knowsley Housing Trust v Prescott
possession orders, enforcement:postponement:rent arrears
1. Manchester CC v Finn
possession orders, enforcement:postponement:succession
1. Austin v Southwark LBC
possession orders, enforcement:preliminary issues determined on facts without fact-finding exercise
1. Southwark LBC v O’Sullivan
possession orders, enforcement:pretexts for gaining possession, where incidents are
1. Matthews v Ahmed
possession orders, enforcement:prima facie meaning, court should not go behind
1. Capital Prime Plus plc v Wills
possession orders, enforcement:private and family life and home, right to respect for
1. Crawley BC v Ure
2. R (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset Police
3. Ward v Hillingdon LBC
possession orders, enforcement:private and family life and home, right to respect for:interim possession orders
1. R (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset Police
2. Ward v Hillingdon LBC
possession orders, enforcement:private and family life and home, right to respect for:judicial sale
1. Zehentner v Austria
possession orders, enforcement:private and family life and home, right to respect for:legitimate aim
1. Velosa Barretto v Portugal
possession orders, enforcement:private and family life and home, right to respect for:mortgage borrowers
1. Wood v UK
possession orders, enforcement:private and family life and home, right to respect for:necessary in a democratic society
1. Stanková v Slovakia
possession orders, enforcement:private and family life and home, right to respect for:private landlords
1. Velosa Barretto v Portugal
possession orders, enforcement:private and family life and home, right to respect for:proportionality
1. Zehentner v Austria
possession orders, enforcement:private and family life and home, right to respect for:security of tenure
1. Administrative law and human rights defences
possession orders, enforcement:private landlords
1. Velosa Barretto v Portugal
possession orders, enforcement:proportionality
1. Zehentner v Austria
2. Castle Vale Housing Action Trust v Gallagher
possession orders, enforcement:Protection from Eviction Act 1977
1. Polarpark Enterprises Inc v Allason
possession orders, enforcement:racial harassment by children
1. West Kent Housing Association v Davies
possession orders, enforcement:reasonableness
1. Breach of obligation and anti-social behaviour
2. Accent Peerless Ltd (formerly Surrey Heath Housing Association Ltd) v Kingsdon
3. Barking and Dagenham LBC v Hyatt and Hyatt
4. Bedfordshire Pilgrims Housing Association Ltd v Khan
5. Brent LBC v Doughan
possession orders, enforcement:rehearings
1. Sheffield CC v Jepson
possession orders, enforcement:remorse, outright orders where tenant shows no
1. Manchester CC v Higgins
possession orders, enforcement:removal directions
1. Ward v Hillingdon LBC
possession orders, enforcement:Rent Act tenancies
1. Introduction and general considerations
possession orders, enforcement:rent arrears, payment of
1. Merton LBC v Hashmi
possession orders, enforcement:rent arrears:55 years to pay of arrears, where it would take
1. Taj v Ali (No 1)
possession orders, enforcement:rent arrears:conduct of tenants, reasonableness of
1. Sopwith v Stutchbury
possession orders, enforcement:rent arrears:low arrears
1. Sopwith v Stutchbury
possession orders, enforcement:rent arrears:payment
1. Dellenty v Pellow
2. Merton LBC v Hashmi
possession orders, enforcement:rent arrears:postponement
1. Manchester CC v Finn
possession orders, enforcement:rent arrears:prima facie meaning, court should not go behind
1. Capital Prime Plus plc v Wills
possession orders, enforcement:rent arrears:reasonableness
1. Dellenty v Pellow
2. Rent arrears
3. Brent LBC v Marks
4. Burgoyne v Griffiths
5. Haringey LBC v Stewart
6. Hayman v Rowlands
7. Laimond Properties Ltd v Raeuchle
8. Lambeth LBC v Henry
9. Lambeth LBC v Thomas
10. Lee-Steere v Jennings
11. Second WRVS Housing Society v Blair
12. Sopwith v Stutchbury
13. Taj v Ali (No 1)
14. Woodspring DC v Taylor
possession orders, enforcement:rent arrears:water charges
1. Lambeth LBC v Thomas
possession orders, enforcement:reoccupation by different persons, enforcement of writ where
1. Anchor HA v Person Unknown
possession orders, enforcement:repairs, possession refused where tenants had allowed access for
1. Empson v Forde
possession orders, enforcement:replacement tenancies
1. The effect of possession orders – in general
possession orders, enforcement:res judicata
1. UCB Bank plc v Chandler
possession orders, enforcement:revival of tenancies
1. Dunn v Bradford MDC; Marston v Leeds CC
possession orders, enforcement:secure tenancies
1. Introduction and general considerations
2. The effect of possession orders – in general
possession orders, enforcement:security of tenure
1. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Quigley
possession orders, enforcement:subtenancies
1. Camden LBC v Shortlife Community Housing Ltd and Others
possession orders, enforcement:succession
1. Austin v Southwark LBC
possession orders, enforcement:suitable alternative accommodation
1. Laimond Properties Ltd v Al-Shakarchi
2. Suitable alternative accommodation
3. Battlespring Ltd v Gates
4. Dawncar Investments Ltd v Plews
5. Lee v Whitehouse
6. Minchburn Estates Ltd v Fernandez
possession orders, enforcement:summary possession
1. Wandsworth LBC v Whibley
possession orders, enforcement:Supreme Court
1. Manchester CC v Pinnock (No 2)
possession orders, enforcement:tolerated trespassers
1. The effect of possession orders – in general
possession orders, enforcement:trespassers
1. McPhail v Persons Unknown
2. Swordheath Properties Ltd v Floydd
possession orders, enforcement:trespassers:enforcement
1. Wiltshire CC v Frazer (No 2)
2. Admiral Taverns (Cygnet) Ltd v Daniel and Daly
possession orders, enforcement:trespassers:tolerated trespassers
1. The effect of possession orders – in general
possession orders, enforcement:vacant possession
1. Trustee in Bankruptcy of Canty v Canty
2. Anchor HA v Person Unknown
possession orders, enforcement:vacated premises, no revival where tenants have
1. Dunn v Bradford MDC; Marston v Leeds CC
possession orders, enforcement:variation of orders
1. Manchester CC v Finn
possession orders, enforcement:warrants for possession:bailiffs entitlement to evict anyone found on premises
1. R v Wandsworth County Court ex p Wandsworth LBC
possession orders, enforcement:warrants for possession:continuation of tenancies
1. The effect of possession orders – in general
possession orders, enforcement:warrants for possession:date of possession, issue prior to
1. Tuohy v Bell
possession orders, enforcement:warrants for possession:nullity, warrants issued prior to date of possession a
1. Tuohy v Bell
possession orders, enforcement:warrants for possession:rent arrears, payment of
1. Merton LBC v Hashmi
possession orders, enforcement:warrants for possession:setting aside
1. Merton LBC v Hashmi
possession orders, enforcement:water charges
1. Lambeth LBC v Thomas
possession orders, enforcement:weight given to tenant’s needs
1. Enfield LBC v French
possession orders, enforcement:writs of restitution
1. Wiltshire CC v Frazer (No 2)
possession orders:abusive and menacing language, no orders where
1. Woking BC v Bistram
possession orders:after possession orders
1. The effect of possession orders – in general
2. Church Commissioners for England v Al-Emarah
3. Merton LBC v Hashmi
possession orders:all relevant circumstances, taking into account
1. Cumming v Danson
possession orders:allocation
1. Dixon v Wandsworth LBC
possession orders:anti-social behaviour orders
1. London and Quadrant Housing Trust v Root
2. Manchester CC v Higgins
possession orders:appeals
1. Knowsley Housing Trust v Prescott
2. Plymouth CC v Hoskin
3. Admiral Taverns (Cygnet) Ltd v Daniel and Daly
possession orders:assignment
1. Croydon LBC v Buston and Triance
possession orders:assured tenancies
1. Laimond Properties Ltd v Al-Shakarchi
2. Introduction and general considerations
3. The effect of possession orders – in general
possession orders:bailiffs:court bailiffs, without use of
1. Haniff v Robinson
possession orders:bailiffs:entitlement to evict anyone found on premises
1. R v Wandsworth County Court ex p Wandsworth LBC
possession orders:bankruptcy
1. Harlow DC v Hall
possession orders:breach of obligations as ground for possession
1. Southwark LBC v O’Sullivan
2. Kensington and Chelsea RLBC v Simmonds
3. Breach of obligation and anti-social behaviour
4. Barking and Dagenham LBC v Hyatt and Hyatt
possession orders:cattle from land, removal of
1. Bristol & West Investments plc v Tompkins
possession orders:children
1. Kensington and Chelsea RLBC v Simmonds
possession orders:committal for contempt
1. Bristol & West Investments plc v Tompkins
2. Tuohy v Bell
possession orders:consent orders
1. ‘Consent orders’
2. Appleton v Aspin
3. Hounslow LBC v McBride
4. Plaschkes v Jones
5. R v Bloomsbury and Marylebone County Court ex p Blackburne
6. R v Worthing BC ex p Bruce
7. Smith v McGoldrick
8. Wandsworth LBC v Fadayomi
9. R v Birmingham CC ex p Foley
10. R v Newcastle upon Tyne County Court ex p Thompson
possession orders:continuation of tenancies until execution of warrants
1. The effect of possession orders – in general
possession orders:county courts
1. Manchester CC v Pinnock (No 2)
2. Plymouth CC v Hoskin
3. Polarpark Enterprises Inc v Allason
possession orders:criminal offences
1. North Devon Homes Ltd v Batchelor
2. Interim possession orders and removal directions
possession orders:date for possession
1. Austin v Southwark LBC
2. Wandsworth LBC v Whibley
3. Tuohy v Bell
possession orders:degree, weight given to tenant’s needs as a matter of
1. Enfield LBC v French
possession orders:delay
1. Palumbo v Italy
2. Panteleeva v Ukraine
possession orders:demoted tenancies
1. Manchester CC v Pinnock
possession orders:deterioration of garden until becoming a tenant, successors not liable for
1. Holloway v Povey
possession orders:directions for removal
1. R v Wealden DC ex p Wales; R v Lincolnshire CC ex p Atkinson
possession orders:discretion H1, I3.2, L3,1
1. Shropshire CC v Wynne
possession orders:dogs, intention to continue keeping
1. Sheffield CC v Green
possession orders:drug convictions
1. North Devon Homes Ltd v Batchelor
2. Knowsley Housing Trust v Prescott
3. Dixon v Wandsworth LBC
possession orders:effect of possession orders
1. The effect of possession orders – in general
2. Church Commissioners for England v Al-Emarah
3. Merton LBC v Hashmi
possession orders:eligible persons
1. Dixon v Wandsworth LBC
possession orders:enforcement
1. Bristol & West Investments plc v Tompkins
2. R v Wandsworth County Court ex p Wandsworth LBC
3. Trustee in Bankruptcy of Canty v Canty
4. Tuohy v Bell
5. Anchor HA v Person Unknown
6. Six Arlington Street Investments v Persons Unknown
7. Wiltshire CC v Frazer (No 2)
8. Admiral Taverns (Cygnet) Ltd v Daniel and Daly
9. Boyland & Sons Ltd v Rand
10. Polarpark Enterprises Inc v Allason
possession orders:enforcement:bankruptcy
1. Harlow DC v Hall
possession orders:enforcement:continuation of tenancies
1. The effect of possession orders – in general
possession orders:enforcement:county court
1. Polarpark Enterprises Inc v Allason
possession orders:enforcement:fair hearing, right to a
1. Palumbo v Italy
possession proceedings
1. Introduction
possession proceedings:adjournments
1. Adjournments
2. Bates v Croydon LBC
3. Brent LBC v Aniedobe
4. Kingscastle Ltd v Owen-Owen
5. North Camden Housing Cooperative Ltd v O’Sullivan
6. Spitaliotis v Morgan
7. Verrilli v Idigoras
8. R v A Circuit Judge (sitting at Norwich County Court) ex p Wathen
possession proceedings:appeals
1. Appeals
2. Ealing LBC v Richardson
3. Law Land v Sinclair
4. Moat Housing Group South Ltd v Harris and Hartless
5. Taj v Ali (No 2)
possession proceedings:assured shorthold tenancies
1. Introduction
possession proceedings:bankruptcy
1. Possession claims and bankruptcy
2. Harlow DC v Hall
possession proceedings:charging orders to be given notice, persons with
1. Croydon (Unique) Ltd v Wright
possession proceedings:Children Act services
1. R v Hillingdon LBC ex p McDonagh
possession proceedings:Civil Procedure Rules
1. Introduction
possession proceedings:commencement of proceedings
1. Patel v Smeaton
2. Camden LBC v M
3. Commencement of proceedings
4. Alamo Housing Co-operative Ltd v Meredith
5. Chesters Accommodation Agency Ltd v Abebrese
6. Barnet Primary Care Trust v X
7. Birmingham CC v Hosey
possession proceedings:costs
1. Costs
2. Church Commissioners for England v Ibrahim
3. Hackney LBC v Campbell
possession proceedings:counterclaims
1. Islington LBC v Keane
possession proceedings:employees, former
1. Whitbread West Pennines Ltd v Reedy
possession proceedings:enforcement of possession orders
1. Crawley BC v Ure
2. Bristol & West Investments plc v Tompkins
3. R v Wandsworth County Court ex p Wandsworth LBC
4. Trustee in Bankruptcy of Canty v Canty
5. Tuohy v Bell
6. Anchor HA v Person Unknown
7. Six Arlington Street Investments v Persons Unknown
8. Wiltshire CC v Frazer (No 2)
9. Admiral Taverns (Cygnet) Ltd v Daniel and Daly
10. Boyland & Sons Ltd v Rand
11. Polarpark Enterprises Inc v Allason
possession proceedings:homeless persons
1. R v Hillingdon LBC ex p McDonagh
possession proceedings:injunctions
1. Injunctions against tenants and third parties
possession proceedings:interim possession orders against trespassers
1. Introduction
possession proceedings:lay representation on rent arrears possession cases
1. Hackney LBC v Spring
possession proceedings:licensees
1. Manchester Airport plc v Dutton
possession proceedings:notice requiring possession
1. Notice requiring possession (Housing Act 1988 s21)
2. Aylward v Fawaz
3. Barker v Hands
4. Church Commissioners for England v Meya
5. Elias v Spencer
6. Fernandez v McDonald
7. Gracechurch International v Tribhovan and Abdul
8. Lower Street Properties v Jones
9. Notting Hill Housing Trust v Roomus
10. Singh v Emmanuel
possession proceedings:notice seeking possession
2. Introduction
3. Notice of proceedings for possession (Housing Act 1988)
4. Kelsey Housing Association v King
5. Knowsley Housing Trust v Revell; Helena Housing Ltd v Curtis
6. Marath v MacGillivray
7. Mountain v Hastings
8. North British Housing Association v Sheridan
9. McShane v William Sutton Trust
possession proceedings:occupation as a residence
1. Carphone Warehouse UK Ltd v Malekout
2. Moreland Properties (UK) Ltd v Dhokia
possession proceedings:private and family life, right to respect for
1. Administrative law and human rights defences
possession proceedings:proportionality
1. Administrative law and human rights defences
possession proceedings:repairing covenants
1. Islington LBC v Keane
possession proceedings:representation
1. Representation
2. Hackney LBC v Spring
possession proceedings:section 21 notices
1. Introduction
possession proceedings:security of tenure
1. Administrative law and human rights defences
possession proceedings:settlements
1. Carphone Warehouse UK Ltd v Malekout
possession proceedings:subtenancies
1. Moreland Properties (UK) Ltd v Dhokia
possession proceedings:surrender
1. Coker v London Rent Assessment Panel
postponement of possession:appeals
1. Knowsley Housing Trust v Prescott
postponement of possession:breach of possession orders
1. Wandsworth LBC v Whibley
postponement of possession:date for possession
1. Austin v Southwark LBC
2. Wandsworth LBC v Whibley
postponement of possession:death, due to
1. Austin v Southwark LBC
postponement of possession:enforcement
1. Boyland & Sons Ltd v Rand
postponement of possession:nuisance and annoyance
1. Knowsley Housing Trust v Prescott
postponement of possession:rent arrears
1. Manchester CC v Finn
postponement of possession:succession
1. Austin v Southwark LBC
preferences:date of new schemes, priority to run from before
1. R (Faarah) v Southwark LBC
preferences:homeless persons
1. General
preferences:reasonable preference
1. General
2. R (Kabashi) v Redbridge LBC
3. Reasonable preference
4. R (Ahmad) v Newham LBC
5. R v Wolverhampton MBC ex p Watters
6. R (Lin) v Barnet LBC
7. R (Babakandi) v Westminster CC
preferences:rent arrears
1. R v Wolverhampton MBC ex p Watters
preferences:schemes
1. General
preferences:statutory categories
1. General
preferences:transfers
1. R (Ahmad) v Newham LBC
pregnant women:bed and breakfast accommodation
1. Suitability and out of area placements
pregnant women:continued occupation, reasonableness of
1. R v Brent LBC ex p Yusuf
pregnant women:homelessness
1. R v Brent LBC ex p Yusuf
2. R v Hackney LBC ex p Ajayi
3. Suitability and out of area placements
4. R v Newham LBC ex p Dada
pregnant women:suitability
1. R v Brent LBC ex p Yusuf
2. Suitability and out of area placements
3. R v Newham LBC ex p Dada
prejudice:appeals
1. Moat Housing Group South Ltd v Harris and Hartless
prejudice:possession orders, setting aside
1. Tower Hamlets LBC v Abadie
prejudice:stay of proceedings
1. Moat Housing Group South Ltd v Harris and Hartless
prejudicial to health:accidents, risk of
1. R v Bristol CC ex p Everett
prejudicial to health:definition
1. SFI Group plc v Gosport BC
prejudicial to health:environmental health officers, assessment by
1. O’Toole v Knowlsley MBC
prejudicial to health:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under
1. Criminal proceedings under Environmental Protection Act 1990 and other Acts
2. Birmingham CC v Oakley
3. R v Bristol CC ex p Everett
4. SFI Group plc v Gosport BC
5. O’Toole v Knowlsley MBC
6. R (Vella) v Lambeth LBC and London and Quadrant Housing Trust
prejudicial to health:experts
1. Southwark LBC v Simpson
prejudicial to health:likelihood of illness
1. R v Bristol CC ex p Everett
prejudicial to health:rooms, arrangement of
1. Birmingham CC v Oakley
priority need and homelessness:16–17 year olds
1. 16/17-year-olds
2. R (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
priority need and homelessness:16–17 year olds:assessment of needs
1. R (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
priority need and homelessness:16–17 year olds:Children Act duties
1. R (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
priority need and homelessness
1. Priority need
priority need and homelessness:assessment of needs
1. R (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
priority need and homelessness:caravans, disappearance of
1. Higgs v Brighton and Hove CC
priority need and homelessness:categories, list of
1. Priority need
priority need and homelessness:children
1. Dependent children
2. Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBC
3. R v Lambeth LBC ex p Vaglivello
4. Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBC
5. Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBC
priority need and homelessness:children:Children Act services
1. R (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
priority need and homelessness:children:family court orders
1. Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBC
2. Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBC
3. Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBC
priority need and homelessness:children:reside with applicant, need not wholly or completely
1. R v Lambeth LBC ex p Vaglivello
priority need and homelessness:children:wholly and exclusively dependent, need not be
1. R v Lambeth LBC ex p Vaglivello
priority need and homelessness:definition of vulnerability
1. Vulnerable
priority need and homelessness:demolition orders
1. Noble v South Herefordshire DC
priority need and homelessness:disaster, meaning of
1. Noble v South Herefordshire DC
priority need and homelessness:drug addiction
1. Crossley v Westminster CC
priority need and homelessness:emergencies
1. Homeless as a result of an emergency
2. Higgs v Brighton and Hove CC
3. Noble v South Herefordshire DC
4. R v Bristol CC ex p Bradic
priority need and homelessness:enquiries, inadequacy of
1. Benson v Lewisham LBC
priority need and homelessness:evicted, persons illegally
1. R v Bristol CC ex p Bradic
priority need and homelessness:exceptional circumstances
1. Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBC
2. Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBC
3. Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBC
priority need and homelessness:facts, evaluation of all the
1. Crossley v Westminster CC
priority need and homelessness:family court orders
1. Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBC
2. Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBC
3. Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBC
priority need and homelessness:fires
1. Noble v South Herefordshire DC
priority need and homelessness:floods
1. Noble v South Herefordshire DC
priority need and homelessness:guidance
1. Vulnerable
2. Shala v Birmingham CC
priority need and homelessness:households
1. Priority need
priority need and homelessness:institutionalised, whether prisoners have become
1. Kelly v Westminster CC
priority need and homelessness:intentional homelessness
1. Crawley BC v B
priority need and homelessness:main housing duty
1. R v Brent LBC ex p Sadiq
priority need and homelessness:medical advisers, use of
1. Shala v Birmingham CC
2. Simms v Islington LBC
priority need and homelessness:medical evidence
1. Allison v Wandsworth LBC
priority need and homelessness:medical officers, adoption of opinion of
1. R v Lambeth LBC ex p Carroll
priority need and homelessness:other parent, where accommodated with
1. Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBC
2. Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBC
3. Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames RLBC
priority need and homelessness:other special reason:free-standing category, as
1. R v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p Kihara
priority need and homelessness:Pereira test
1. Vulnerable
priority need and homelessness:prisoners
1. Kelly v Westminster CC
priority need and homelessness:reside with applicant, need not wholly or completely
1. R v Lambeth LBC ex p Vaglivello
priority need and homelessness:severe disability for benefit purposes, assessment of
1. Mangion v Lewisham LBC
priority need and homelessness:single men with health problems, inadequate enquiries about
1. Benson v Lewisham LBC
priority need and homelessness:vulnerable persons
1. Priority need
2. Vulnerable
3. Allison v Wandsworth LBC
4. Crossley v Westminster CC
5. Mangion v Lewisham LBC
6. R v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p Kihara
7. Shala v Birmingham CC
8. Simms v Islington LBC
9. R v Lambeth LBC ex p Carroll
10. Benson v Lewisham LBC
11. Kelly v Westminster CC
priority need and homelessness:Wednesbury unreasonableness
1. Kelly v Westminster CC
priority need and homelessness:wholly and exclusively dependent, need not be
1. R v Lambeth LBC ex p Vaglivello
prisoners:homelessness
1. R (B) v Southwark LBC
prisoners:housing benefit
1. Saint v Barking and Dagenham LBC
prisoners:institutionalised prisoners
1. Kelly v Westminster CC
prisoners:long sentences
1. Amoah v Barking and Dagenham LBC
2. Notting Hill Housing Trust v Etoria
prisoners:release
1. Notting Hill Housing Trust v Etoria
prisoners:subtenancies
1. Amoah v Barking and Dagenham LBC
2. Notting Hill Housing Trust v Etoria
prisoners:warrants of possession, setting aside
1. Saint v Barking and Dagenham LBC
prisoners:Wednesbury unreasonableness
1. Kelly v Westminster CC
private and family life and home, right to respect for
1. Surugiu v Romania
2. Belchikova v Russia
3. Horie v UK
4. Kay v UK
5. Office public d’habitation de la Ville de Paris v Yedei
6. Orlić v Croatia
7. Stanková v Slovakia
8. Velosa Barretto v Portugal
9. Wood v UK
10. Zehentner v Austria
private and family life and home, right to respect for:anti-sharing clauses
1. Office public d’habitation de la Ville de Paris v Yedei
private and family life and home, right to respect for:apologise, failure to
1. R (Bernard) v Enfield LBC
private and family life and home, right to respect for:bed and breakfast, signing in requirements at
1. Orejudos v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
private and family life and home, right to respect for:conflicts of interest
1. Belchikova v Russia
private and family life and home, right to respect for:damages
1. Anufrijeva v Southwark LBC
2. R (Bernard) v Enfield LBC
private and family life and home, right to respect for:delay
1. Anufrijeva v Southwark LBC
private and family life and home, right to respect for:demoted tenancies
1. Manchester CC v Pinnock
private and family life and home, right to respect for:eviction:conflicts of interest
1. Belchikova v Russia
private and family life and home, right to respect for:eviction:explanations, provision of
1. Orlić v Croatia
private and family life and home, right to respect for:explanations, provision of
1. Orlić v Croatia
private and family life and home, right to respect for:families, members of
1. Michalak v Wandsworth LBC
private and family life and home, right to respect for:Gypsies and Travellers
1. R (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset Police
2. Ward v Hillingdon LBC
3. Codona v Mid-Bedfordshire DC
private and family life and home, right to respect for:homelessness
1. Sharp v Brent LBC
2. Codona v Mid-Bedfordshire DC
3. Orejudos v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
4. R (Yumsak) v Enfield LBC
private and family life and home, right to respect for:injunctions against trespass
1. Horie v UK
private and family life and home, right to respect for:interim possession orders
1. R (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset Police
2. Ward v Hillingdon LBC
private and family life and home, right to respect for:judicial sale
1. Zehentner v Austria
private and family life and home, right to respect for:legitimate aim
1. Velosa Barretto v Portugal
private and family life and home, right to respect for:maladministration
1. Anufrijeva v Southwark LBC
private and family life and home, right to respect for:mortgage borrowers
1. Wood v UK
2. Barclays Bank v Alcorn
private and family life and home, right to respect for:necessary in a democratic society
1. Stanková v Slovakia
private and family life and home, right to respect for:notice to quit
1. Crawley BC v Ure
private and family life and home, right to respect for:nuisance and annoyance
1. Castle Vale Housing Action Trust v Gallagher
private and family life and home, right to respect for:out of area placements
1. R (Yumsak) v Enfield LBC
private and family life and home, right to respect for:possession claims/orders:interim possession orders
1. R (Fuller) v Chief Constable of Dorset Police
2. Ward v Hillingdon LBC
private and family life and home, right to respect for:possession claims/orders:judicial sale
1. Zehentner v Austria
private and family life and home, right to respect for:possession claims/orders:legitimate aim
1. Velosa Barretto v Portugal
private and family life and home, right to respect for:possession claims/orders:mortgage borrowers
1. Wood v UK
2. Barclays Bank v Alcorn
private and family life and home, right to respect for:possession claims/orders:necessary in a democratic society
1. Stanková v Slovakia
private and family life and home, right to respect for:possession claims/orders:private landlords
1. Velosa Barretto v Portugal
private and family life and home, right to respect for:possession claims/orders:proportionality
1. Zehentner v Austria
private and family life and home, right to respect for:possession claims/orders:security of tenure
1. Administrative law and human rights defences
private and family life and home, right to respect for:possession claims/orders:setting aside warrants
1. Southwark LBC v St Brice
private and family life and home, right to respect for:private landlords
1. Velosa Barretto v Portugal
private and family life and home, right to respect for:proportionality
1. Kay v UK
2. Zehentner v Austria
private and family life and home, right to respect for:removal directions
1. Ward v Hillingdon LBC
private and family life and home, right to respect for:repeated interference, failure to stop
1. Surugiu v Romania
private and family life and home, right to respect for:same sex partners
1. Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza
private and family life and home, right to respect for:security of tenure
1. Administrative law and human rights defences
2. Poplar Housing and Regeneration Community Association Ltd v Donoghue
private and family life and home, right to respect for:succession
1. Michalak v Wandsworth LBC
2. Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza
3. Sharp v Brent LBC
private and family life and home, right to respect for:suitable accommodation
1. R (Yumsak) v Enfield LBC
2. R (Bernard) v Enfield LBC
private and family life and home, right to respect for:trespass
1. Horie v UK
private sector :definition
1. Private sector leasing (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 6)
private sector :licences
1. Tower Hamlets LBC v Miah
private sector :possession proceedings
1. Velosa Barretto v Portugal
private sector :private and family life and home, right to respect for
1. Velosa Barretto v Portugal
private sector :public landlords, leases of property to
1. Private sector leasing (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 6)
2. Haringey LBC v Hickey
3. Tower Hamlets LBC v Abdi
4. Tower Hamlets LBC v Miah
5. Westminster CC v Boraliu
private sector :security of tenure
1. Private sector leasing (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 6)
2. Haringey LBC v Hickey
3. Tower Hamlets LBC v Abdi
4. Tower Hamlets LBC v Miah
5. Westminster CC v Boraliu
private sector :subtenancies by public landlords
1. Private sector leasing (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 6)
2. Haringey LBC v Hickey
3. Tower Hamlets LBC v Abdi
4. Tower Hamlets LBC v Miah
5. Westminster CC v Boraliu
private sector :vacant possession
1. Private sector leasing (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 6)
2. Haringey LBC v Hickey
3. Tower Hamlets LBC v Abdi
4. Tower Hamlets LBC v Miah
5. Westminster CC v Boraliu
prohibition notices
1. Local authority enforcement
2. Hanley v Tameside MBC
promissory estoppel
1. Emery v UCB Bank plc
proper working order
1. O’Connor v Old Etonians Housing Association Ltd
2. Veolia Water Central Ltd v London Fire & Emergency Planning Authority
prostitution, premises used for
1. British Petroleum Pension Trust v Behrendt
Protection from Eviction Act 1977:breach of statutory duty
1. Protection from Eviction Act 1977 (civil provisions)
Protection from Eviction Act 1977:civil provisions
1. Civil proceedings
2. Protection from Eviction Act 1977 (civil provisions)
3. Desnousse v Newham LBC
4. McCall v Abelesz
5. Mohamed v Manek and Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
6. Pirabakaran v Patel
7. Sumeghova v McMahon
8. Rogerson v Wigan MBC
Protection from Eviction Act 1977:county court, enforcement in the
1. Polarpark Enterprises Inc v Allason
Protection from Eviction Act 1977:definition of occupier
1. Protection from Eviction Act 1977 (civil provisions)
Protection from Eviction Act 1977:exclusions
1. Protection from Eviction Act 1977 (civil provisions)
Protection from Eviction Act 1977:forfeiture
1. Eaton Square Properties Ltd v Beveridge
Protection from Eviction Act 1977:gas and electricity, implied covenants to supply
1. McCall v Abelesz
Protection from Eviction Act 1977:harassment and illegal eviction
1. Civil proceedings
2. Protection from Eviction Act 1977 (civil provisions)
3. Desnousse v Newham LBC
4. McCall v Abelesz
5. Mohamed v Manek and Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
6. Pirabakaran v Patel
7. Sumeghova v McMahon
8. Rogerson v Wigan MBC
Protection from Eviction Act 1977:homelessness
1. Desnousse v Newham LBC
2. Rogerson v Wigan MBC
Protection from Eviction Act 1977:hostels
1. Rogerson v Wigan MBC
Protection from Eviction Act 1977:licences
1. Protection from Eviction Act 1977 (civil provisions)
2. Desnousse v Newham LBC
3. Rogerson v Wigan MBC
Protection from Eviction Act 1977:mixed residential/business premises
1. Pirabakaran v Patel
Protection from Eviction Act 1977:notice to quit
1. Introduction
2. Protection from Eviction Act 1977 (civil provisions)
Protection from Eviction Act 1977:possession orders
1. Polarpark Enterprises Inc v Allason
Protection from Eviction Act 1977:shared with landlord, where accommodation temporarily
1. Sumeghova v McMahon
Protection from Eviction Act 1977:temporary accommodation
1. Mohamed v Manek and Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
2. Rogerson v Wigan MBC
psychiatric evidence
1. Croydon LBC v Moody
2. Noh v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
psychological/psychiatric harm
1. Hunt v Hussain
2. Yemshaw v Hounslow LBC
public authorities:functional public authorities, housing associations as
1. Poplar Housing and Regeneration Community Association Ltd v Donoghue
public authorities:housing associations
1. R (Weaver) v London & Quadrant Housing Trust
2. Poplar Housing and Regeneration Community Association Ltd v Donoghue
public authorities:hybrid authorities
1. Administrative law and human rights defences
public authorities:rent arrears
1. R (Weaver) v London & Quadrant Housing Trust
public authorities:security of tenure
1. Administrative law and human rights defences
2. Poplar Housing and Regeneration Community Association Ltd v Donoghue
public health and environmental protection
1. Gwynedd CC v Grunshaw
2. Local authority enforcement
3. Pollway Nominees Ltd v Croydon LBC
4. R v Cardiff CC ex p Cross
5. R v Mansfield DC ex p Ashfield Nominees
6. R (Erskine) v Lambeth LBC
7. Bolton MBC v Patel
8. Hanley v Tameside MBC
public health and environmental protection:appeals
1. Gwynedd CC v Grunshaw
2. R v Mansfield DC ex p Ashfield Nominees
public health and environmental protection:ceilings, height of
1. Hanley v Tameside MBC
public health and environmental protection:clearance areas
1. Local authority enforcement
public health and environmental protection:compulsory purchase orders
1. Local authority enforcement
public health and environmental protection:demolition orders
1. Local authority enforcement
public health and environmental protection:discrimination
1. R (Erskine) v Lambeth LBC
public health and environmental protection:disrepair
1. Gwynedd CC v Grunshaw
2. Local authority enforcement
3. Pollway Nominees Ltd v Croydon LBC
4. R v Cardiff CC ex p Cross
5. R v Mansfield DC ex p Ashfield Nominees
6. R (Erskine) v Lambeth LBC
7. Bolton MBC v Patel
8. Hanley v Tameside MBC
public health and environmental protection:emergency remedial action
1. Bolton MBC v Patel
public health and environmental protection:hazard, concept of
1. Local authority enforcement
public health and environmental protection:hazard assessments
1. Bolton MBC v Patel
public health and environmental protection:hazard awareness notices
1. Local authority enforcement
public health and environmental protection:Houses in Multiple Occupation
1. Local authority enforcement
public health and environmental protection:Housing Health and Safety Rating System (HHSRS)
1. Local authority enforcement
public health and environmental protection:improvement notices
1. Local authority enforcement
public health and environmental protection:judicial review
1. R v Mansfield DC ex p Ashfield Nominees
public health and environmental protection:local authority enforcement
1. Gwynedd CC v Grunshaw
2. Local authority enforcement
3. Pollway Nominees Ltd v Croydon LBC
4. R v Cardiff CC ex p Cross
5. R v Mansfield DC ex p Ashfield Nominees
6. R (Erskine) v Lambeth LBC
7. Bolton MBC v Patel
8. Hanley v Tameside MBC
public health and environmental protection:prohibition notices
1. Local authority enforcement
2. Hanley v Tameside MBC
public health and environmental protection:repairs notices
1. Local authority enforcement
2. Pollway Nominees Ltd v Croydon LBC
3. R v Cardiff CC ex p Cross
4. R (Erskine) v Lambeth LBC
public health and environmental protection:service on wrong persons
1. Pollway Nominees Ltd v Croydon LBC
public health and environmental protection:steps, steepness of
1. Hanley v Tameside MBC
public interest
1. Velikovi v Bulgaria
2. Greenwich LBC v Grogan
quiet enjoyment, covenant of :direct physical interference, breach without
1. Kenny v Preen
quiet enjoyment, covenant of :disrepair, damages for
1. Thornton and Jarrett v Birmingham CC
quiet enjoyment, covenant of :harassment and illegal eviction
1. Civil proceedings
2. Kenny v Preen
3. Queensway Marketing Ltd v Associated Restaurants Ltd
quiet enjoyment, covenant of :physical eviction not necessary
1. Queensway Marketing Ltd v Associated Restaurants Ltd
quiet enjoyment, covenant of :repairing covenants
1. Southwark LBC v Mills; Southwark LBC v Tanner; Baxter v Camden LBC
quiet enjoyment, covenant of :scaffolding, erection of
1. Queensway Marketing Ltd v Associated Restaurants Ltd
quota systems, operation of ad hoc
1. R (Babakandi) v Westminster CC
race:abuse
1. Kensington and Chelsea RLBC v Simmonds
race:breach of obligations as ground for possession
1. Kensington and Chelsea RLBC v Simmonds
race:children, harassment by
1. West Kent Housing Association v Davies
race:harassment
1. West Kent Housing Association v Davies
race:nuisance and annoyance
1. West Kent Housing Association v Davies
rat infestation in drains
1. Sarmad v Okello
re-entry, forfeiture by
1. Billson v Residential Apartments Ltd
re-grant, surrender and
1. Mattey Securities Ltd v Ervin
reasonableness:anti-social behaviour
1. Breach of obligation and anti-social behaviour
reasonableness:consent orders
1. ‘Consent orders’
reasons:introductory tenancies
1. R (Forbes) v Lambeth LBC
rectification
1. Alderson v Beetham Organisation Ltd
redecoration after repairs
1. McDougall v Easington DC
2. Bradley v Chorley BC
3. McGreal v Wake
redevelopment, property required for
1. Temporary use pending development (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 3)
2. Attley v Cherwell DC
3. Hyde Housing Association Ltd v Harrison
4. Lillieshall Road Housing Co-operative Ltd v Brennan
5. Property required for demolition or redevelopment
6. Wansbeck DC v Marley
7. Sugarwhite v Afridi
referrals:homelessness
1. R v Beverley BC ex p McPhee
2. R v Southwark LBC ex p Dagou
referrals:Lettings Direct Scheme, referrals to
1. R (Raw) v Lambeth LBC
referrals:rent assessment committees
1. Rent regulation (assured tenants)
2. R (Lester) v London Rent Assessment Committee
3. R (Morris) v London Rent Assessment Committee
4. Earl of Cadogan v Chehab
5. Ghani v London Rent Assessment Committee
6. R (Innes) v Northern Rent Assessment Panel
refusal of offers:assured shorthold tenancies
1. Griffiths v St Helens Council
refusal of offers:facts at date of refusal
1. Osseily v Westminster CC
refusal of offers:homelessness
1. Griffiths v St Helens Council
2. Vilvarasa v Harrow LBC
3. Osseily v Westminster CC
refusal of offers:previous warnings
1. Vilvarasa v Harrow LBC
refusal of offers:warnings
1. Vilvarasa v Harrow LBC
registered social landlords
1. Introductory tenancies
rehearings
1. Bracknell Forest BC v Green
2. Ealing LBC v Richardson
reinstatement:harassment and illegal eviction
1. Housing Act 1988 ss27 and 28
2. Tagro v Cafane and Patel
reinstatement:trespassers
1. Whitbread West Pennines Ltd v Reedy
remorse, outright orders where tenants show no
1. Manchester CC v Higgins
rent:assured tenancies
1. Rent regulation (assured tenants)
2. Riverside Housing Association Ltd v White
3. Bankway Properties v Dunsford
4. Contour Homes Ltd v Rowen
5. Hughes v Borodex Ltd
6. R (Lester) v London Rent Assessment Committee
7. R (Morris) v London Rent Assessment Committee
8. Tadema Holdings v Ferguson
9. Earl of Cadogan v Chehab
10. Ghani v London Rent Assessment Committee
11. London District Properties Management Ltd v Goolamy
12. N & D (London) Ltd v Gadson
13. R v London Rent Assessment Panel ex p Cadogan Estates
14. R (Innes) v Northern Rent Assessment Panel
15. Rowe v South West Rent Assessment Panel
rent:books
1. Westminster CC v Basson
2. Shaw v Groom
3. RC Glaze Properties Ltd v Alabdinboni
4. Andrews v Cunningham
rent:company lets
1. Estavest Investments Ltd v Commercial Express Travel Ltd
rent:control
1. Urbárska Obec Trencianske Biskupice v Slovakia
rent:creation of tenancies
1. Creation of tenancies
rent:disrepair, damages for:40% of rent
1. Mzae v Abigo
rent:disrepair, damages for:50% of rent
1. Aslam v Ali
rent:disrepair, damages for:assessment
1. Aslam v Ali
2. Murray v Kelly
3. Mzae v Abigo
rent:disrepair, damages for:different items based on rent
1. Murray v Kelly
rent:disrepair, damages for:exceed rent, damages should not
1. Shine v English Churches Housing Group
rent:disrepair, damages for:fair rent, registration of
1. Sturolson and Co v Mauroux
rent:disrepair, damages for:foreseeable, loss of rent as
1. Mira v Aylmer Square Investments Ltd
rent:disrepair, damages for:housing benefit
1. Wallace v Manchester CC
rent:disrepair, damages for:lifts
1. Electricity Supply Nominees Ltd v National Magazine Co Ltd
rent:disrepair, damages for:loss of rental income
1. Irontrain Investments Ltd v Ansari
2. Mira v Aylmer Square Investments Ltd
rent:disrepair, damages for:repairing covenants
1. Brikom Investments Ltd v Seaford
rent:employees, licences for
1. Royal Philanthropic Society v County
rent:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under
1. Camden LBC v Gunby
rent:exclusive possession
1. Nunn v Dalrymple
2. Mansfield DC v Langridge
rent:fair rent, registration of
1. Sturolson and Co v Mauroux
rent:family relationships
1. Nunn v Dalrymple
2. Ward v Warnke
rent:farm workers need no longer pay rent, agreements that
1. Foster v Robinson
rent:foreseeable, loss of rent as
1. Mira v Aylmer Square Investments Ltd
rent:gas and electricity of bills as not being rent, payment of
1. Bostock v Bryant and Another
rent:housing benefit
1. Wallace v Manchester CC
rent:Housing Revenue Account, costs improperly included in
1. R v Ealing LBC ex p Lewis
rent:leave premises owing rent, where tenants
1. Preston BC v Fairclough
rent:licences
1. Nunn v Dalrymple
2. Ward v Warnke
3. Mansfield DC v Langridge
rent:lifts
1. Electricity Supply Nominees Ltd v National Magazine Co Ltd
rent:London
1. Tenancies at a high or low rent (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 paras 2 and 3 and Rent Act 1977 ss4–5)
rent:loss of rental income
1. Irontrain Investments Ltd v Ansari
2. Mira v Aylmer Square Investments Ltd
rent:non-tenants, payment of rent by
1. Mattey Securities Ltd v Ervin
rent:notice requiring possession
1. Church Commissioners for England v Meya
rent:owners as persons receiving rent
1. Camden LBC v Gunby
rent:peaceful enjoyment of possessions
1. Urbárska Obec Trencianske Biskupice v Slovakia
rent:police
1. Holmes v South Yorkshire Police Authority
rent:reasonableness
1. Rents (secure tenants)
2. R v Ealing LBC ex p Lewis
3. Wandsworth LBC v Winder (No 2)
rent:registration
1. Brikom Investments Ltd v Seaford
rent:regulation
1. Rent regulation (assured tenants)
2. Rent regulation (Rent Act 1977 tenants)
rent:rent books
1. Westminster CC v Basson
2. Shaw v Groom
3. RC Glaze Properties Ltd v Alabdinboni
4. Andrews v Cunningham
rent:rent review clauses
1. Bankway Properties v Dunsford
2. Contour Homes Ltd v Rowen
rent:secure tenancies
1. Variation of non-rent terms (secure tenants)
2. Rents (secure tenants)
3. R v Ealing LBC ex p Lewis
4. Wandsworth LBC v Winder (No 2)
rent:security of tenure
1. Tenancies at a high or low rent (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 paras 2 and 3 and Rent Act 1977 ss4–5)
2. Bostock v Bryant and Another
3. Rents (secure tenants)
4. R v Ealing LBC ex p Lewis
5. Wandsworth LBC v Winder (No 2)
6. Rent regulation (assured tenants)
7. Rent regulation (Rent Act 1977 tenants)
rent:separate dwelling, let as a
1. Mansfield DC v Langridge
rent:services or money
1. Creation of tenancies
rent:shams
1. Estavest Investments Ltd v Commercial Express Travel Ltd
rent:suspension of possession orders
1. Vandermolen v Toma
rent:unlawfulness of rent set
1. R v Ealing LBC ex p Lewis
rent:variation of terms
1. Variation of non-rent terms (secure tenants)
2. Palmer v Sandwell MBC
3. R (Kilby) v Basildon DC
4. R v Brent LBC ex p Blatt
Rent Act tenancies :agricultural employees
1. Agricultural employees
Rent Act tenancies :board and attendance
1. Board and attendance
2. Otter v Norman
3. Nelson Developments Ltd v Taboada
4. Rita Dale v Adrahill Ltd
Rent Act tenancies :breach of obligations as ground for possession
1. Breach of obligation
2. Breach of obligation (Rent Act 1977 Sch 15 Case 1)
3. Cadogan Estates Ltd v McMahon
4. Florent v Horez
Rent Act tenancies :business tenancies
1. Business tenancies (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 11, Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 4 and Rent Act 1977 s24)
2. Broadway Investments Hackney Ltd v Grant
3. Cheryl Investments Ltd v Saldanha
4. Gurton v Parrott
5. Lewis v Weldcrest Ltd
6. Pulleng v Curran
7. Tan v Sitkowski
8. Wagle v Trustees of Henry Smith’s Charity Kensington Estate
9. Wright v Mortimer
Rent Act tenancies :common law, termination of
1. Introduction
Rent Act tenancies :company lets
1. Company lets
2. Eaton Square Properties Ltd v O’Higgins
3. Estavest Investments Ltd v Commercial Express Travel Ltd
Rent Act tenancies :definition
1. Introduction
Rent Act tenancies :employees
1. Licences – occupation granted to employees
2. Former employees
Rent Act tenancies :fair rent, determination of
1. Rent regulation (Rent Act 1977 tenants)
Rent Act tenancies :grounds for possession
1. Introduction
Rent Act tenancies :holiday lets
1. Holiday lets (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 9 and Rent Act 1977 s9)
2. Buchmann v May
3. Killick v Roberts
4. R v Rent Officer for Camden LBC ex p Plant
5. McHale v Daneham
Rent Act tenancies :incidental, where business merely
1. Wright v Mortimer
Rent Act tenancies :landlords or members of family, premises required
1. Owner-occupiers
2. Premises required for landlord or member of family (Rent Act 1977 Sch 15 Case 9)
3. Alexander v Mohamadzadeh
4. Amaddio v Dalton
5. Baker v MacIver
6. Bassett v Fraser
7. Bostock v Tacher de la Pagerie
8. Coombes v Parry
9. Evans v Engelson
10. Ghelani v Bowie
11. Hodges v Blee
12. Kidder v Birch
13. Manaton v Edwards
14. Mansukhani v Sharkey
Rent Act tenancies :licences
1. Licences – occupation granted to employees
Rent Act tenancies :new tenancies remain protected
1. Kotecha v Rimington
Rent Act tenancies :nuisance and annoyance
1. Anti-social behaviour
2. Abrahams v Wilson
3. Cobstone Investments Ltd v Maxim
4. Frederick Platts Co Ltd v Grigor
Rent Act tenancies :overcrowding
1. Overcrowding
Rent Act tenancies :owner-occupiers and grounds for possession
1. Owner-occupiers
2. Premises required for landlord or member of family (Rent Act 1977 Sch 15 Case 9)
3. Alexander v Mohamadzadeh
4. Amaddio v Dalton
5. Baker v MacIver
6. Bassett v Fraser
7. Bostock v Tacher de la Pagerie
8. Coombes v Parry
9. Evans v Engelson
10. Ghelani v Bowie
11. Hodges v Blee
12. Kidder v Birch
13. Manaton v Edwards
14. Mansukhani v Sharkey
Rent Act tenancies :possession orders
1. Introduction and general considerations
2. Suspension of warrants before execution
3. Setting aside warrants after execution
Rent Act tenancies :prior to Housing Act 1988, tenant not protected
1. Secretarial Nominee Co Ltd v Thomas
Rent Act tenancies :reason for occupying premises, business not
1. Wright v Mortimer
Rent Act tenancies :rent arrears
1. Rent arrears
2. Bird v Hildage
3. Dellenty v Pellow
4. Shaw v Groom
Rent Act tenancies :residence, occupation as
1. Occupation as a residence; Rent Act 1977 s2(1)(a)
2. Hampstead Way Investments Ltd v Lewis-Weare
3. Bevington v Crawford
4. Blanway Investments Ltd v Lynch
5. Brickfield Properties Ltd v Hughes
6. Brown v Brash
7. Carphone Warehouse UK Ltd v Malekout
8. Gofor Investments v Roberts
9. Hall v King
10. Moreland Properties (UK) Ltd v Dhokia
11. Prince v Robinson
12. Regalian Securities Ltd v Scheuer
13. Richards v Green
14. Stephens v Kerr
15. Tickner v Hearn
16. Wigley v Leigh
Rent Act tenancies :resident landlords
1. Resident landlords (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 10 and Rent Act 1977 s12)
2. Bardrick v Haycock
3. Barnes v Goresuch
4. Cooper v Tait
5. Griffiths v English
6. Jackson v Pekic
7. Lewis-Graham v Conacher
8. O’Sullivan v Barnett
9. Palmer v McNamara
10. Wolff v Waddington
Rent Act tenancies :same or substantially the same premises
1. Rajah v Arogol Co Ltd
2. Goringe v Twinsectra Ltd
Rent Act tenancies :security of tenure:board and attendance
1. Board and attendance
2. Otter v Norman
3. Nelson Developments Ltd v Taboada
4. Rita Dale v Adrahill Ltd
Rent Act tenancies :security of tenure:business tenancies
1. Business tenancies (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 11, Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 4 and Rent Act 1977 s24)
2. Broadway Investments Hackney Ltd v Grant
3. Cheryl Investments Ltd v Saldanha
4. Gurton v Parrott
5. Lewis v Weldcrest Ltd
6. Pulleng v Curran
7. Tan v Sitkowski
8. Wagle v Trustees of Henry Smith’s Charity Kensington Estate
9. Wright v Mortimer
Rent Act tenancies :security of tenure:definition
1. Introduction
Rent Act tenancies :security of tenure:exceptions
1. Introduction
2. Business tenancies (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 11, Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 4 and Rent Act 1977 s24)
3. Broadway Investments Hackney Ltd v Grant
4. Cheryl Investments Ltd v Saldanha
5. Gurton v Parrott
6. Lewis v Weldcrest Ltd
7. Pulleng v Curran
8. Tan v Sitkowski
9. Wagle v Trustees of Henry Smith’s Charity Kensington Estate
10. Wright v Mortimer
11. Holiday lets (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 9 and Rent Act 1977 s9)
12. Buchmann v May
13. Killick v Roberts
14. R v Rent Officer for Camden LBC ex p Plant
15. McHale v Daneham
16. Resident landlords (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 10 and Rent Act 1977 s12)
17. Bardrick v Haycock
18. Barnes v Goresuch
19. Cooper v Tait
20. Griffiths v English
Rent Act tenancies :security of tenure:holiday lets
1. Holiday lets (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 9 and Rent Act 1977 s9)
2. Buchmann v May
3. Killick v Roberts
4. R v Rent Officer for Camden LBC ex p Plant
5. McHale v Daneham
Rent Act tenancies :security of tenure:residence, occupation as
1. Occupation as a residence; Rent Act 1977 s2(1)(a)
2. Hampstead Way Investments Ltd v Lewis-Weare
3. Bevington v Crawford
4. Blanway Investments Ltd v Lynch
5. Brickfield Properties Ltd v Hughes
6. Brown v Brash
7. Carphone Warehouse UK Ltd v Malekout
8. Gofor Investments v Roberts
9. Hall v King
10. Moreland Properties (UK) Ltd v Dhokia
11. Prince v Robinson
12. Regalian Securities Ltd v Scheuer
13. Richards v Green
14. Stephens v Kerr
15. Tickner v Hearn
16. Wigley v Leigh
Rent Act tenancies :security of tenure:resident landlords
1. Resident landlords (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 10 and Rent Act 1977 s12)
2. Bardrick v Haycock
3. Barnes v Goresuch
4. Cooper v Tait
5. Griffiths v English
6. Jackson v Pekic
7. Lewis-Graham v Conacher
8. O’Sullivan v Barnett
9. Palmer v McNamara
10. Wolff v Waddington
Rent Act tenancies :security of tenure:separate dwelling, let as a
1. Let as a separate dwelling
2. Goodrich v Paisner
3. Uratemp Ventures Ltd v Collins
4. Westminster CC v Clarke
5. Gray v Brown
6. Grosvenor Estates Belgravia v Cochran
7. Horford Investments v Lambert
8. Kavanagh v Lyroudias
9. Mansfield DC v Langridge
10. Miller v Eyo
11. Mortgage Corporation v Ubah
12. Parkins v Westminster CC
13. St Catherine’s College v Dorling
14. Tyler v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
15. R v Rent Officer of Nottinghamshire Registration Area ex p Allen
16. Andrews v Brewer
17. Tomkins v Basildon DC
18. Webb v Barnet LBC
Rent Act tenancies :security of tenure:succession
1. Succession to Rent Act tenancies
2. Carega Properties SA v Sharratt
3. Fitzpatrick v Sterling Housing Association
4. Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza
5. Brock v Wollams
6. Chios Investment Property Co v Lopez
7. Clore v MacNicol
8. Daejan Properties Ltd v Mahoney
9. Hedgedale Ltd v Hards
10. Hildebrand v Moon
11. Sefton Holdings Ltd v Cairns
12. Swanbrae Ltd v Elliott
13. Tennant v Hutton
14. Portman Registrars v Mohammed Latif
Rent Act tenancies :separate dwelling, let as a
1. Let as a separate dwelling
2. Goodrich v Paisner
3. Uratemp Ventures Ltd v Collins
4. Westminster CC v Clarke
5. Gray v Brown
6. Grosvenor Estates Belgravia v Cochran
7. Horford Investments v Lambert
8. Kavanagh v Lyroudias
9. Mansfield DC v Langridge
10. Miller v Eyo
11. Mortgage Corporation v Ubah
12. Parkins v Westminster CC
13. St Catherine’s College v Dorling
14. Tyler v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
15. R v Rent Officer of Nottinghamshire Registration Area ex p Allen
16. Andrews v Brewer
17. Tomkins v Basildon DC
18. Webb v Barnet LBC
Rent Act tenancies :shops, protection of tenants above
1. Wellcome Trust v Hamad
Rent Act tenancies :subtenancies
1. Wellcome Trust v Hamad
Rent Act tenancies :succession
1. Succession to Rent Act tenancies
2. Carega Properties SA v Sharratt
3. Fitzpatrick v Sterling Housing Association
4. Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza
5. Brock v Wollams
6. Chios Investment Property Co v Lopez
7. Clore v MacNicol
8. Daejan Properties Ltd v Mahoney
9. Hedgedale Ltd v Hards
10. Hildebrand v Moon
11. Sefton Holdings Ltd v Cairns
12. Swanbrae Ltd v Elliott
13. Tennant v Hutton
14. Portman Registrars v Mohammed Latif
Rent Act tenancies :suitable alternative accommodation
1. Suitable alternative accommodation
Rent Act tenancies :surrender
1. Truro Diocesan Board of Finance Ltd v Foley
Rent Act tenancies :suspension of warrants before execution
1. Suspension of warrants before execution
Rent Act tenancies :termination at common law
1. Introduction
rent arrears, payment of arrears:payments into court reducing arrears to below 2 months
1. Etherington v Burt
rent arrears, payment of arrears:permanent accommodation, policy not to move people with rent arrears to
1. R v Newham LBC ex p Miah (Askir)
rent arrears, payment of arrears:persistent delay
1. Rent arrears
rent arrears, payment of arrears:pleaded, matters not
1. Laimond Properties Ltd v Raeuchle
rent arrears, payment of arrears:possession claims, counterclaims in
1. Televantos v McCulloch
rent arrears, payment of arrears:possession orders:55 years to pay of arrears, where it would take
1. Taj v Ali (No 1)
rent arrears, payment of arrears:possession orders:conduct of tenants, reasonableness of
1. Sopwith v Stutchbury
rent arrears, payment of arrears:possession orders:everyday practice, suspension as
1. Hayman v Rowlands
rent arrears, payment of arrears:possession orders:homelessness
1. Green and Coyne v Croydon LBC
rent arrears, payment of arrears:possession orders:lay representation on rent arrears possession cases
1. Hackney LBC v Spring
rent arrears, payment of arrears:possession orders:low arrears
1. Sopwith v Stutchbury
rent arrears, payment of arrears:possession orders:obvious orders to make, suspended orders as
1. Lambeth LBC v Henry
rent arrears, payment of arrears:possession orders:payment
1. Dellenty v Pellow
2. Merton LBC v Hashmi
rent arrears, payment of arrears:possession orders:postponement of orders
1. Manchester CC v Finn
rent arrears, payment of arrears:possession orders:prima facie meaning, court should not go behind
1. Capital Prime Plus plc v Wills
rent arrears, payment of arrears:possession orders:reasonableness
1. Rent arrears
2. Brent LBC v Marks
3. Burgoyne v Griffiths
4. Haringey LBC v Stewart
5. Hayman v Rowlands
6. Laimond Properties Ltd v Raeuchle
7. Lambeth LBC v Henry
8. Lambeth LBC v Thomas
9. Lee-Steere v Jennings
10. Second WRVS Housing Society v Blair
11. Sopwith v Stutchbury
12. Taj v Ali (No 1)
13. Woodspring DC v Taylor
rent arrears, payment of arrears:possession orders:setting aside orders
1. Brent LBC v Marks
2. Second WRVS Housing Society v Blair
rent arrears, payment of arrears:possession orders:setting aside warrants
1. Merton LBC v Hashmi
2. Lambeth LBC v Hughes
3. Saint v Barking and Dagenham LBC
rent arrears, payment of arrears:possession orders:suspension
1. Hayman v Rowlands
2. Lambeth LBC v Henry
3. Taj v Ali (No 1)
4. Vandermolen v Toma
5. Stonebridge HAT v Gabbidon
rent arrears, payment of arrears:possession orders:water charges
1. Lambeth LBC v Thomas
rent arrears, payment of arrears:possession proceedings, adjournment of
1. R v A Circuit Judge (sitting at Norwich County Court) ex p Wathen
rent arrears, payment of arrears:postponement of orders
1. Manchester CC v Finn
rent arrears, payment of arrears:preferences
1. R v Wolverhampton MBC ex p Watters
rent arrears, payment of arrears:public authorities, housing associations as
1. R (Weaver) v London & Quadrant Housing Trust
rent arrears, payment of arrears:quarterly payments due to social security system
1. Brent LBC v Marks
rent arrears, payment of arrears:quarterly payments of arrears due to social security system
1. Brent LBC v Marks
rent arrears, payment of arrears:reasonable preference, definition of
1. R v Wolverhampton MBC ex p Watters
rent arrears, payment of arrears:reasonableness
1. Dellenty v Pellow
2. Brent LBC v Marks
3. Haringey LBC v Stewart
4. Laimond Properties Ltd v Raeuchle
5. Woodspring DC v Taylor
rent arrears, payment of arrears:reasonableness of possession orders
1. Dellenty v Pellow
2. Rent arrears
3. Brent LBC v Marks
4. Burgoyne v Griffiths
5. Haringey LBC v Stewart
6. Hayman v Rowlands
7. Laimond Properties Ltd v Raeuchle
8. Lambeth LBC v Henry
9. Lambeth LBC v Thomas
10. Lee-Steere v Jennings
11. Second WRVS Housing Society v Blair
12. Sopwith v Stutchbury
13. Taj v Ali (No 1)
14. Woodspring DC v Taylor
rent arrears, payment of arrears:reasonableness of possession orders:counterclaims, failure of
1. Haringey LBC v Stewart
rent arrears, payment of arrears:reasonableness of possession orders:judges must apply mind to reasonableness
1. Burgoyne v Griffiths
rent arrears, payment of arrears:reasonableness of possession orders:payment of arrears
1. Dellenty v Pellow
2. Brent LBC v Marks
3. Haringey LBC v Stewart
4. Laimond Properties Ltd v Raeuchle
5. Woodspring DC v Taylor
rent arrears, payment of arrears:reasons for non-payment, consideration of
1. R v Wandsworth LBC ex p Hawthorne
2. R v Wyre BC ex p Joyce
rent arrears, payment of arrears:relief from forfeiture
1. Artesian Residential Investments Ltd v Beck
rent arrears, payment of arrears:Rent Act tenancies
1. Rent arrears
2. Bird v Hildage
3. Dellenty v Pellow
4. Shaw v Groom
rent arrears, payment of arrears:rent books, failure to provide
1. Shaw v Groom
rent arrears, payment of arrears:return rent, waiver of forfeiture where landlord does not
1. Thomas v Ken Thomas Ltd
rent arrears, payment of arrears:rigid policy
1. R v Lambeth LBC ex p Njomo
rent arrears, payment of arrears:sale
1. National and Provincial Building Society v Lloyd
rent arrears, payment of arrears:section 8 notices, service of
1. Rent arrears
rent arrears, payment of arrears:section 146 notices, right to forfeit not waived by
1. Church Commissioners for England v Nodjoumi
rent arrears, payment of arrears:secure tenancies
1. Rent arrears (Housing Act 1985 Sch 2 Ground 1)
2. Notting Hill Housing Trust v Jones
3. Lewisham LBC v Simba-Tola
rent arrears, payment of arrears:setting aside orders
1. Brent LBC v Marks
rent arrears, payment of arrears:setting aside possession orders
1. Brent LBC v Marks
2. Second WRVS Housing Society v Blair
rent arrears, payment of arrears:setting aside warrants
1. Merton LBC v Hashmi
rent arrears, payment of arrears:settled accommodation and intentional homelessness
1. Bratton v Croydon LBC
rent arrears, payment of arrears:social security benefits position, ascertaining the
1. Second WRVS Housing Society v Blair
rent arrears, payment of arrears:succession
1. Muscat v Smith
rent arrears, payment of arrears:surrender
1. Chamberlain v Scalley
2. Mattey Securities Ltd v Ervin
3. Preston BC v Fairclough
rent arrears, payment of arrears:suspension from bidding
1. R (Babakandi) v Westminster CC
rent arrears, payment of arrears:suspension of possession orders
1. Hayman v Rowlands
2. Lambeth LBC v Henry
3. Taj v Ali (No 1)
4. Vandermolen v Toma
rent arrears, payment of arrears:suspension of warrants before execution
1. Stonebridge HAT v Gabbidon
rent arrears, payment of arrears:tender
1. Bessa Plus v Lancaster
rent arrears, payment of arrears:tendered, rent not lawfully due if
1. Bird v Hildage
rent arrears, payment of arrears:third parties, tender of rent from
1. Bessa Plus v Lancaster
rent arrears, payment of arrears:waiver of breach, payment operating as
1. Thomas v Ken Thomas Ltd
rent arrears, payment of arrears:water rates and other charges
1. Lewisham LBC v Simba-Tola
2. Lambeth LBC v Thomas
rent arrears :8 weeks or 2 months arrears
1. Rent arrears
2. Etherington v Burt
rent arrears :55 years to pay of arrears, where it would take
1. Taj v Ali (No 1)
rent arrears :acquiescence and intentional homelessness
1. R v Nottingham CC ex p Caine
rent arrears :adjournments
1. North British Housing Association Limited v Matthews
2. Milecastle Housing Ltd v Walton
3. Lee-Steere v Jennings
rent arrears :admissions
1. Baygreen Properties Ltd v Gil
rent arrears :affordability
1. R v Brent LBC ex p Baruwa
2. R v Wandsworth LBC ex p Hawthorne
rent arrears :agents, tender by
1. Bessa Plus v Lancaster
rent arrears :agreements to remain after orders not creating new tenancies
1. Leadenhall Residential 2 Ltd v Stirling
rent arrears :‘all the rent in arrears’, definition of
1. Maryland Estates v Bar-Joseph
rent arrears :allocation:preferences
1. R v Wolverhampton MBC ex p Watters
rent arrears :allocation:reasonable preference
1. R v Wolverhampton MBC ex p Watters
rent arrears :allocation:rigid policy
1. R v Lambeth LBC ex p Njomo
rent arrears :allocation:suspension from bidding
1. R (Babakandi) v Westminster CC
rent arrears :appeals
1. Lee-Steere v Jennings
rent arrears :assignment
1. Church Commissioners for England v Nodjoumi
2. Notting Hill Housing Trust v Jones
rent arrears :assured shorthold tenancies
1. Rent arrears
rent arrears :assured tenancies
1. Rent arrears (Housing Act 1988 Sch 2 Grounds 8, 10 and 11)
2. Artesian Residential Investments Ltd v Beck
3. Baygreen Properties Ltd v Gil
4. Bessa Plus v Lancaster
5. Capital Prime Plus plc v Wills
6. Day v Coltrane
7. Leadenhall Residential 2 Ltd v Stirling
8. North British Housing Association Limited v Matthews
9. R (Weaver) v London & Quadrant Housing Trust
10. Diab v Countrywide Rentals 1 plc
11. Etherington v Burt
12. Milecastle Housing Ltd v Walton
rent arrears :causation
1. Bratton v Croydon LBC
rent arrears :cheques as conditional payments
1. Day v Coltrane
rent arrears :conduct of tenants, reasonableness of
1. Sopwith v Stutchbury
rent arrears :continuing liability for rent, as including
1. Maryland Estates v Bar-Joseph
rent arrears :counterclaims
1. Etherington v Burt
2. Haringey LBC v Stewart
3. Televantos v McCulloch
rent arrears :date of hearings
1. Rent arrears
rent arrears :definition of rent
1. Lewisham LBC v Simba-Tola
rent arrears :deliberate failure to pay rent
1. R v Brent LBC ex p Baruwa
rent arrears :demands for rent not waiving right to forfeit
1. Van Haarlam v Kasner Charitable Trust
rent arrears :direct payments, possibility of
1. Second WRVS Housing Society v Blair
rent arrears :discretionary grounds
1. Rent arrears
2. Rent arrears (Housing Act 1988 Sch 2 Grounds 8, 10 and 11)
3. Artesian Residential Investments Ltd v Beck
4. Baygreen Properties Ltd v Gil
5. Bessa Plus v Lancaster
6. Capital Prime Plus plc v Wills
7. Day v Coltrane
8. Leadenhall Residential 2 Ltd v Stirling
9. North British Housing Association Limited v Matthews
10. R (Weaver) v London & Quadrant Housing Trust
11. Diab v Countrywide Rentals 1 plc
12. Etherington v Burt
13. Milecastle Housing Ltd v Walton
rent arrears :establishment of grounds, need for
1. Baygreen Properties Ltd v Gil
rent arrears :everyday practice, suspension of possession orders as
1. Hayman v Rowlands
rent arrears :exceptional circumstances for adjournments to allow payment
1. North British Housing Association Limited v Matthews
rent arrears :face of orders, mandatory grounds must be stated on
1. Diab v Countrywide Rentals 1 plc
rent arrears :forfeiture
1. Maryland Estates v Bar-Joseph
rent arrears :forfeiture:‘all the rent in arrears’, definition of
1. Maryland Estates v Bar-Joseph
rent arrears :forfeiture:assignment, section 146 notice on
1. Church Commissioners for England v Nodjoumi
rent arrears :forfeiture:continuing liability, including
1. Maryland Estates v Bar-Joseph
rent arrears :forfeiture:demands for rent not waiving right to forfeit
1. Van Haarlam v Kasner Charitable Trust
rent arrears :forfeiture:return rent, waiver where landlord does not
1. Thomas v Ken Thomas Ltd
rent arrears :forfeiture:section 146 notices, right to forfeit not waived by
1. Church Commissioners for England v Nodjoumi
rent arrears :forfeiture:waiver of breach, payment operating as
1. Thomas v Ken Thomas Ltd
rent arrears :full payment of arrears, insistence of
1. Lambeth LBC v Hughes
rent arrears :further evidence
1. Lee-Steere v Jennings
rent arrears :grounds for possession
1. Marath v MacGillivray
2. Rent arrears
3. Rent arrears
4. Brent LBC v Marks
5. Burgoyne v Griffiths
6. Haringey LBC v Stewart
7. Hayman v Rowlands
8. Laimond Properties Ltd v Raeuchle
9. Lambeth LBC v Henry
10. Lambeth LBC v Thomas
11. Lee-Steere v Jennings
12. Second WRVS Housing Society v Blair
13. Sopwith v Stutchbury
14. Taj v Ali (No 1)
15. Woodspring DC v Taylor
rent arrears :homelessness
1. Bratton v Croydon LBC
2. Green and Coyne v Croydon LBC
3. R v Wyre BC ex p Joyce
4. R v Newham LBC ex p Miah (Askir)
rent arrears :Housing Act 1988
1. Rent arrears
2. Rent arrears (Housing Act 1985 Sch 2 Ground 1)
3. Notting Hill Housing Trust v Jones
4. Lewisham LBC v Simba-Tola
5. Rent arrears (Housing Act 1988 Sch 2 Grounds 8, 10 and 11)
6. Artesian Residential Investments Ltd v Beck
7. Baygreen Properties Ltd v Gil
8. Bessa Plus v Lancaster
9. Capital Prime Plus plc v Wills
10. Day v Coltrane
11. Leadenhall Residential 2 Ltd v Stirling
12. North British Housing Association Limited v Matthews
13. R (Weaver) v London & Quadrant Housing Trust
14. Diab v Countrywide Rentals 1 plc
15. Etherington v Burt
16. Milecastle Housing Ltd v Walton
17. Bird v Hildage
18. Dellenty v Pellow
19. Shaw v Groom
20. Rent arrears
21. Brent LBC v Marks
22. Burgoyne v Griffiths
23. Haringey LBC v Stewart
24. Hayman v Rowlands
25. Laimond Properties Ltd v Raeuchle
26. Lambeth LBC v Henry
27. Lambeth LBC v Thomas
28. Lee-Steere v Jennings
29. Second WRVS Housing Society v Blair
30. Sopwith v Stutchbury
31. Taj v Ali (No 1)
32. Woodspring DC v Taylor
rent arrears :housing associations acting as public authorities
1. R (Weaver) v London & Quadrant Housing Trust
rent arrears :jurisdiction
1. Rent arrears
2. Baygreen Properties Ltd v Gil
3. Bird v Hildage
rent arrears :lay representation on rent arrears possession cases
1. Hackney LBC v Spring
rent arrears :leave premises owing rent, where tenants
1. Preston BC v Fairclough
rent arrears :long absences with large arrears
1. Chamberlain v Scalley
rent arrears :low arrears, reasonableness of possession orders where
1. Sopwith v Stutchbury
rent arrears :mandatory grounds
1. Rent arrears
2. Diab v Countrywide Rentals 1 plc
rent arrears :no arrangements for payment, where there are
1. Haringey LBC v Stewart
rent arrears :non-tenants, payment of rent by
1. Mattey Securities Ltd v Ervin
rent arrears :notice seeking possession
1. Torridge DC v Jones
2. Marath v MacGillivray
rent arrears :obvious orders to make, suspended possession orders as
1. Lambeth LBC v Henry
rent arrears :offers to pay
1. Laimond Properties Ltd v Raeuchle
rent arrears :oppression
1. Lambeth LBC v Hughes
rent arrears :owner-occupiers, returning
1. Boyle v Verrall
rent arrears :payment of arrears
1. Lambeth LBC v Hughes
2. Saint v Barking and Dagenham LBC
rent arrears :payment of arrears:no arrangements for payment, where there are
1. Haringey LBC v Stewart
rent arrears :payment of arrears:offers to pay
1. Laimond Properties Ltd v Raeuchle
rent books :assured shorthold tenancies
1. Andrews v Cunningham
rent books :assured tenancies, use of words
1. Andrews v Cunningham
rent books :creation of tenancies
1. Westminster CC v Basson
rent books :errors
1. Westminster CC v Basson
rent books :failure to supply rent books
1. Shaw v Groom
rent books :subletting whole of premises
1. RC Glaze Properties Ltd v Alabdinboni
rent regulation :assured shorthold tenancies
1. Park Lane Properties Ltd v Northern Rent Assessment Committee
rent regulation :assured tenants
1. Rent regulation (assured tenants)
2. Riverside Housing Association Ltd v White
3. Bankway Properties v Dunsford
4. Contour Homes Ltd v Rowen
5. Hughes v Borodex Ltd
6. R (Lester) v London Rent Assessment Committee
7. R (Morris) v London Rent Assessment Committee
8. Tadema Holdings v Ferguson
9. Earl of Cadogan v Chehab
10. Ghani v London Rent Assessment Committee
11. London District Properties Management Ltd v Goolamy
12. N & D (London) Ltd v Gadson
13. R v London Rent Assessment Panel ex p Cadogan Estates
14. R (Innes) v Northern Rent Assessment Panel
15. Rowe v South West Rent Assessment Panel
rent regulation :avoidance of statutory scheme
1. Bankway Properties v Dunsford
rent regulation :comparables
1. R (Innes) v Northern Rent Assessment Panel
rent regulation :delivery of notices
1. Tadema Holdings v Ferguson
rent regulation :enforcement
1. Bankway Properties v Dunsford
rent regulation :estoppel
1. Contour Homes Ltd v Rowen
rent regulation :excess of limit, rent assessed in
1. R (Morris) v London Rent Assessment Committee
rent regulation :fair rents, determination of
1. Rent regulation (Rent Act 1977 tenants)
rent regulation :improvements by tenants, assessment of
1. Rowe v South West Rent Assessment Panel
rent regulation :increases
1. Riverside Housing Association Ltd v White
2. Bankway Properties v Dunsford
3. Contour Homes Ltd v Rowen
4. London District Properties Management Ltd v Goolamy
rent regulation :initial rent, fixing of
1. Hughes v Borodex Ltd
rent regulation :interpretation in context
1. Riverside Housing Association Ltd v White
rent regulation :material submitted after hearings, no reliance on
1. Earl of Cadogan v Chehab
rent regulation :new rent, starting procedure for fixing
1. Hughes v Borodex Ltd
rent regulation :notice:delivery, service connoting
1. Tadema Holdings v Ferguson
rent regulation :notice:increases
1. Riverside Housing Association Ltd v White
2. London District Properties Management Ltd v Goolamy
rent regulation :notice:not addressed to tenants
1. R (Morris) v London Rent Assessment Committee
rent regulation :notice:older versions
1. Tadema Holdings v Ferguson
rent regulation :notice:prescribed notice, substantially to the like effect as
1. R (Morris) v London Rent Assessment Committee
2. Tadema Holdings v Ferguson
rent regulation :notice:void
1. Riverside Housing Association Ltd v White
rent regulation :personal experience, use of
1. R (Innes) v Northern Rent Assessment Panel
rent regulation :prescribed notice, substantially to the like effect as
1. R (Morris) v London Rent Assessment Committee
2. Tadema Holdings v Ferguson
rent regulation :procedure for fixing new rent, starting
1. Hughes v Borodex Ltd
rent regulation :quantitative approach
1. Ghani v London Rent Assessment Committee
rent regulation :reasons, adequacy of
1. Ghani v London Rent Assessment Committee
rent regulation :referrals must be received by rent assessment committees
1. R (Lester) v London Rent Assessment Committee
rent regulation :rent assessment committees
1. Rent regulation (assured tenants)
2. R (Lester) v London Rent Assessment Committee
3. R (Morris) v London Rent Assessment Committee
4. Earl of Cadogan v Chehab
5. Ghani v London Rent Assessment Committee
6. Park Lane Properties Ltd v Northern Rent Assessment Committee
7. R v London Rent Assessment Panel ex p Cadogan Estates
8. R (Innes) v Northern Rent Assessment Panel
rent regulation :rent review clauses
1. Bankway Properties v Dunsford
2. Contour Homes Ltd v Rowen
rent regulation :rent to be determined, definition of
1. Rent regulation (assured tenants)
rent regulation :service of notices
1. Tadema Holdings v Ferguson
rent regulation :succession
1. N & D (London) Ltd v Gadson
rent regulation :value due to current and former tenants, disregard of reduction in
1. N & D (London) Ltd v Gadson
rent regulation :void notices of increases
1. Riverside Housing Association Ltd v White
repairing covenants:access/entry to premises
1. Yeomans Row Management Ltd v Bodentien-Meyrick
repairing covenants:age of premises
1. McClean v Liverpool CC
2. Newham LBC v Patel
repairing covenants:block of flats
1. Adami v Lincoln Grange Management Ltd
repairing covenants:business efficacy
1. Implied covenants
repairing covenants:character of premises
1. McClean v Liverpool CC
2. Newham LBC v Patel
repairing covenants:condensation
1. Quick v Taff-Ely BC
2. Staves v Leeds CC
repairing covenants:construction of covenants
1. Holding and Barnes plc v Hill House Hammond
2. Petersson v Pitt Place (Epsom) Ltd
repairing covenants:contractors, appointment of
1. Long v Southwark LBC
repairing covenants:correlative obligations on tenants, no implied covenant on landlords where no
1. Demetriou v Poolaction Ltd
repairing covenants:counterclaims
1. Islington LBC v Keane
repairing covenants:damp-proof courses
1. Eyre v McCracken
2. Wainwright v Leeds CC
repairing covenants:dampness:exterior
1. Ball and Ball v Plymouth CC
2. Southwark LBC v McIntosh
repairing covenants:dampness:structure
1. Ball and Ball v Plymouth CC
2. Southwark LBC v McIntosh
repairing covenants:demolished, age and character of premises such that it should be
1. Newham LBC v Patel
repairing covenants:design defects
1. Stent v Monmouth DC
repairing covenants:doors, replacement of
1. Stent v Monmouth DC
repairing covenants:estoppel
1. Brikom Investments Ltd v Seaford
repairing covenants:express covenants
1. Liability in contract
repairing covenants:exterior
1. Douglas-Scott v Scorgie
2. Hopwood v Cannock Chase DC (formerly Rugeley UDC)
3. Quick v Taff-Ely BC
4. Ball and Ball v Plymouth CC
5. Southwark LBC v McIntosh
6. Barrett v Lounova (1982) Ltd
repairing covenants:false walls
1. Fincar SRL v 109/113 Mount Street Management Co Ltd
repairing covenants:fitness of premises, implied warranties as to
1. Southwark LBC v Mills; Southwark LBC v Tanner; Baxter v Camden LBC
repairing covenants:floors
1. Fincar SRL v 109/113 Mount Street Management Co Ltd
2. Windever v Liverpool CC
repairing covenants:good condition, covenants to keep premises in
1. Welsh v Greenwich LBC
2. Lee v Leeds CC
repairing covenants:good working order, meaning of
1. Veolia Water Central Ltd v London Fire & Emergency Planning Authority
repairing covenants:heating systems
1. Creska Ltd v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
repairing covenants:Human Rights Act 1998
1. Lee v Leeds CC
repairing covenants:implied covenants
1. Liability in contract
2. Implied covenants
3. Liverpool CC v Irwin
4. Southwark LBC v Mills; Southwark LBC v Tanner; Baxter v Camden LBC
5. Adami v Lincoln Grange Management Ltd
6. Barrett v Lounova (1982) Ltd
7. Demetriou v Poolaction Ltd
8. Gordon and Texeira v Selico Ltd and Select Managements Ltd
9. King v South Northamptonshire DC
10. Lee v Leeds CC
repairing covenants:improvements
1. Eyre v McCracken
2. McDougall v Easington DC
repairing covenants:inherent defects
1. Stent v Monmouth DC
repairing covenants:intention
1. Implied covenants
repairing covenants:interior
1. Barrett v Lounova (1982) Ltd
repairing covenants:lagging pipes
1. Wycombe Area Health Authority v Barnett
repairing covenants:Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 section 11
1. Islington LBC v Keane
2. Brunskill v Mulcahy
3. Dame Margaret Hungerford Charity Trustees v Beazeley
4. McDougall v Easington DC
5. Murray v Birmingham CC
6. Stent v Monmouth DC
7. Wainwright v Leeds CC
8. Kumarasamy v Edwards
9. Campden Hill Towers Ltd v Gardner
10. Douglas-Scott v Scorgie
11. Hopwood v Cannock Chase DC (formerly Rugeley UDC)
12. Grand v Gill
13. Quick v Taff-Ely BC
14. Staves v Leeds CC
15. Ball and Ball v Plymouth CC
16. Southwark LBC v McIntosh
17. Churchill v Nottingham CC
18. O’Connor v Old Etonians Housing Association Ltd
19. Bradley v Chorley BC
20. Brikom Investments Ltd v Seaford
21. McClean v Liverpool CC
22. Newham LBC v Patel
23. Niazi Services Ltd v Van der Loo
24. Wycombe Area Health Authority v Barnett
25. Windever v Liverpool CC
repairing covenants:make good after repairs, landlords required to
1. Bradley v Chorley BC
repairing covenants:moss on steps
1. Brunskill v Mulcahy
repairing covenants:patch repairs to roof
1. Dame Margaret Hungerford Charity Trustees v Beazeley
2. Murray v Birmingham CC
repairing covenants:paths
1. King v South Northamptonshire DC
repairing covenants:physical damage to structure or exterior
1. Southwark LBC v McIntosh
repairing covenants:pipes, lagging
1. Wycombe Area Health Authority v Barnett
repairing covenants:plaster
1. Grand v Gill
2. Staves v Leeds CC
repairing covenants:possession claims
1. Islington LBC v Keane
repairing covenants:proper working order
1. O’Connor v Old Etonians Housing Association Ltd
2. Veolia Water Central Ltd v London Fire & Emergency Planning Authority
repairing covenants:quiet enjoyment, covenant for
1. Southwark LBC v Mills; Southwark LBC v Tanner; Baxter v Camden LBC
repairing covenants:rear paths, implied term to maintain
1. King v South Northamptonshire DC
repairing covenants:reasonable bystander test
1. Implied covenants
repairing covenants:redecoration after repairs
1. McDougall v Easington DC
2. Bradley v Chorley BC
repairing covenants:rendering parts of walls
1. Fincar SRL v 109/113 Mount Street Management Co Ltd
repairing covenants:rent, registered
1. Brikom Investments Ltd v Seaford
repairing covenants:roofs
1. Dame Margaret Hungerford Charity Trustees v Beazeley
2. Murray v Birmingham CC
3. Douglas-Scott v Scorgie
4. Ibrahim v Dovecorn Reversions Ltd
repairing covenants:soundproofing
1. Southwark LBC v Mills; Southwark LBC v Tanner; Baxter v Camden LBC
repairing covenants:structure:block of flats
1. Adami v Lincoln Grange Management Ltd
repairing covenants:structure:condensation
1. Quick v Taff-Ely BC
repairing covenants:structure:dampness
1. Ball and Ball v Plymouth CC
2. Southwark LBC v McIntosh
repairing covenants:structure:floor joists
1. Fincar SRL v 109/113 Mount Street Management Co Ltd
repairing covenants:structure:main structure
1. Ibrahim v Dovecorn Reversions Ltd
repairing covenants:structure:outside walls
1. Campden Hill Towers Ltd v Gardner
repairing covenants:structure:ownership of landlords, not limited to items in
1. Marlborough Park Services Ltd v Rowe and another
repairing covenants:structure:physical damage
1. Southwark LBC v McIntosh
repairing covenants:structure:plaster
1. Grand v Gill
repairing covenants:structure:roof terraces of flats
1. Ibrahim v Dovecorn Reversions Ltd
repairing covenants:structure:roofs
1. Douglas-Scott v Scorgie
2. Ibrahim v Dovecorn Reversions Ltd
repairing covenants:structure:subsidence
1. Smedley v Chumley and Hawkes Ltd
repairing covenants:structure:surfaces
1. Hallisey v Petmoor Developments Ltd
2. Ibrahim v Dovecorn Reversions Ltd
repairing covenants:structure:walls
1. Smedley v Chumley and Hawkes Ltd
2. Campden Hill Towers Ltd v Gardner
3. Fincar SRL v 109/113 Mount Street Management Co Ltd
4. Hallisey v Petmoor Developments Ltd
repairing covenants:subsidence
1. Smedley v Chumley and Hawkes Ltd
repairing covenants:surfaces
1. Hallisey v Petmoor Developments Ltd
2. Ibrahim v Dovecorn Reversions Ltd
repairing covenants:time limits for counterclaims
1. Islington LBC v Keane
repairing covenants:walls
1. Smedley v Chumley and Hawkes Ltd
2. Campden Hill Towers Ltd v Gardner
3. Fincar SRL v 109/113 Mount Street Management Co Ltd
4. Hallisey v Petmoor Developments Ltd
repairing covenants:washers, replacement of
1. Islington LBC v Keane
repairing covenants:water, tenant’s failure to turn off
1. Wycombe Area Health Authority v Barnett
repairing covenants:water pressure due to works in other parts of building
1. Niazi Services Ltd v Van der Loo
repairing covenants:yards as exterior
1. Hopwood v Cannock Chase DC (formerly Rugeley UDC)
repeat/fresh homelessness applications
1. Repeat/fresh applications
2. R v Harrow LBC ex p Fahia
3. Tower Hamlets LBC v Begum (Rikha)
4. G v Haringey LBC
5. R (Griffin) v Southwark LBC
6. Ali v Camden LBC
repeat/fresh homelessness applications:carers, need for
1. Ali v Camden LBC
repeat/fresh homelessness applications:disability living allowance
1. Ali v Camden LBC
repeat/fresh homelessness applications:exactly the same facts test
1. Repeat/fresh applications
2. R v Harrow LBC ex p Fahia
3. R (Griffin) v Southwark LBC
repeat/fresh homelessness applications:experts, new material from
1. G v Haringey LBC
repeat/fresh homelessness applications:material changes of circumstances test
1. Repeat/fresh applications
2. Tower Hamlets LBC v Begum (Rikha)
3. Ali v Camden LBC
repeat/fresh homelessness applications:separation from partners
1. R (Griffin) v Southwark LBC
representation
1. Representation
2. Hackney LBC v Spring
representation:lay representation on rent arrears possession cases
1. Hackney LBC v Spring
representation:legal representation
1. Bates v Croydon LBC
2. Verrilli v Idigoras
3. Barrett v Southwark LBC
representation:solicitors, problems finding
1. Barrett v Southwark LBC
representations, making:face to face meetings, right to
1. Makisi v Birmingham CC; Yosief v Birmingham CC; Nagi v Birmingham CC
representations, making:homelessness reviews
1. Lambeth LBC v Johnston
2. Makisi v Birmingham CC; Yosief v Birmingham CC; Nagi v Birmingham CC
representations, making:opportunity to make
1. Lambeth LBC v Johnston
representations, making:possession proceedings
1. Introduction
representations, making:telephone, by
1. Makisi v Birmingham CC; Yosief v Birmingham CC; Nagi v Birmingham CC
repudiatory breach
1. Hussein v Mehlman
rescission
1. Killick v Roberts
2. R v Southwark LBC ex p Dagou
residence test:assignment
1. Camden LBC v Goldenberg
residence test:hospital, absence in
1. Hedgedale Ltd v Hards
residence test:intention
1. Camden LBC v Goldenberg
residence test:Rent Act tenancies
1. Jackson v Pekic
residence test:residing with, definition of
1. Islington LBC v Freeman
residence test:subtenancies
1. Crawley BC v Sawyer
2. Gay v Sheeran
3. Notting Hill Housing Trust v Etoria
residence test:succession
1. Islington LBC v Freeman
2. Sheffield CC v Wall
3. Hedgedale Ltd v Hards
residence test:temporary absences
1. Sheffield CC v Wall
resident landlords:common rooms, use of
1. Goodrich v Paisner
resident landlords:conversion works as being of a sufficient degree to render flats purpose built
1. Barnes v Goresuch
resident landlords:intention
1. O’Sullivan v Barnett
resident landlords:new buildings, landlord and tenant moving to
1. O’Sullivan v Barnett
resident landlords:one joint landlord, resident by
1. Cooper v Tait
resident landlords:Protection from Eviction Act 1977
1. Sumeghova v McMahon
resident landlords:purpose built, sufficient degree to render flats
1. Barnes v Goresuch
resident landlords:reservation of right for landlords to live on premises, clear words needed for
1. Gray v Brown
2. Miller v Eyo
resident landlords:residence test
1. Jackson v Pekic
resident landlords:security of tenure
1. Resident landlords (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 10 and Rent Act 1977 s12)
2. Bardrick v Haycock
3. Barnes v Goresuch
4. Cooper v Tait
5. Griffiths v English
6. Jackson v Pekic
7. Lewis-Graham v Conacher
8. O’Sullivan v Barnett
9. Palmer v McNamara
10. Wolff v Waddington
resident landlords:separate dwelling, let as a
1. Goodrich v Paisner
2. Gray v Brown
3. Miller v Eyo
4. Mortgage Corporation v Ubah
resident landlords:separate extensions, landlords living in
1. Bardrick v Haycock
2. Griffiths v English
resident landlords:sleep on premises, where landlord does not
1. Palmer v McNamara
resident landlords:temporary sharing
1. Sumeghova v McMahon
resident landlords:two homes, landlords with
1. Wolff v Waddington
resident permits, refusal of
1. R (Burns) v Southwark LBC
residential occupier, definition of
1. Housing Act 1988 ss27 and 28
residential tenancy agreements - unfair contract terms
1. Brusse and de Man Garabito v Jahani BV
resources:detailed assessments
1. Bernard v Enfield LBC
resources:homelessness
1. Bernard v Enfield LBC
2. R (Conville) v Richmond upon Thames LBC
resources:intentional homelessness
1. R (Conville) v Richmond upon Thames LBC
retrospectivity
1. R v Hackney LBC ex p K
returning owner-occupiers
1. Returning owner-occupier (Housing Act 1988 Sch 2 Ground 1)
2. Boyle v Verrall
3. Hegab v Shamash
4. Mustafa v Ruddock
returning owner-occupiers:all relevant matters, consideration of
1. Hegab v Shamash
returning owner-occupiers:assured tenancies
1. Returning owner-occupier (Housing Act 1988 Sch 2 Ground 1)
2. Boyle v Verrall
3. Hegab v Shamash
4. Mustafa v Ruddock
returning owner-occupiers:dispensing with notice
1. Boyle v Verrall
2. Hegab v Shamash
returning owner-occupiers:exceptional cases for dispensing with notice
1. Boyle v Verrall
returning owner-occupiers:failure to notify tenants
1. Mustafa v Ruddock
returning owner-occupiers:grounds for possession
1. Returning owner-occupier (Housing Act 1988 Sch 2 Ground 1)
2. Boyle v Verrall
3. Hegab v Shamash
4. Mustafa v Ruddock
returning owner-occupiers:notice of possession
1. Boyle v Verrall
2. Mustafa v Ruddock
returning owner-occupiers:reasonableness
1. Boyle v Verrall
returning owner-occupiers:rent, persistent late payment of
1. Boyle v Verrall
revival of tenancies
1. Dunn v Bradford MDC; Marston v Leeds CC
right to a fair trial:article 6
1. Anderson v UK
2. Gorlova v Russia
3. Kletsova v Russia
4. Kunic v Croatia
5. Malinovskiy v Russia
6. Mirzayev v Azerbaijan
7. Palumbo v Italy
8. Panteleeva v Ukraine
9. Teteriny v Russia
10. Tsfayo v UK
11. Vyrovyy v Ukraine
12. Waltoś and Pawlicz v Poland
right to buy:completion, compelling
1. Muir Group Housing Association Ltd v Thornley
right to buy:employees
1. Employees (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 2)
right to buy:exceptions
1. Employees (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 2)
right to buy:extinguishment
1. Bater v Bater; Bater v Greenwich LBC
right to buy:left, loss of right when tenants
1. Jennings v Epping Forest DC
right to buy:notice to quit
1. Bater v Bater; Bater v Greenwich LBC
right to buy:security of tenure
1. Jennings v Epping Forest DC
2. Muir Group Housing Association Ltd v Thornley
3. Sutton LBC v Swann
right to buy:subtenancies
1. Jennings v Epping Forest DC
2. Muir Group Housing Association Ltd v Thornley
3. Sutton LBC v Swann
right to life
1. Article 2: Right to life
2. Budayeva v Russia
right to reside :EEA nationals
1. Zambrano v Office National de l’Emploi
2. R (Mohamed) v Harrow LBC
right to reside :EU nationals
1. Harrow LBC v Ibrahim
2. Lekpo-Bozua v Hackney LBC
right to reside :freestanding and unconditional right
1. Harrow LBC v Ibrahim
right to reside :school age, children of
1. Harrow LBC v Ibrahim
2. Teixeira v Lambeth LBC
right to respect for private and family life:Article 8
1. Article 8: Right to respect for private and family life
roofs:disrepair
1. Dame Margaret Hungerford Charity Trustees v Beazeley
2. Murray v Birmingham CC
3. Douglas-Scott v Scorgie
4. Ibrahim v Dovecorn Reversions Ltd
5. Loria v Hammer
roofs:exterior
1. Dame Margaret Hungerford Charity Trustees v Beazeley
roofs:new and improved roofs
1. New England Properties plc v Portsmouth News Shops Ltd
roofs:patch repairs
1. Dame Margaret Hungerford Charity Trustees v Beazeley
2. Murray v Birmingham CC
roofs:service charges and long leases
1. New England Properties plc v Portsmouth News Shops Ltd
roofs:structure
1. Douglas-Scott v Scorgie
2. Ibrahim v Dovecorn Reversions Ltd
roofs:terraces of flats
1. Ibrahim v Dovecorn Reversions Ltd
roofs:water tanks, defects in
1. Loria v Hammer
rooms:arrangements
1. Birmingham CC v Oakley
rooms:basements
1. Grosvenor Estates Belgravia v Cochran
rooms:bathrooms, lights in
1. Symons v Warren
rooms:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under
1. Birmingham CC v Oakley
rooms:exclusive possession
1. AG Securities v Vaughan
rooms:kitchens
1. Birmingham CC v Oakley
rooms:licence/tenancy distinction
1. AG Securities v Vaughan
rooms:separate dwelling, let as a
1. Goodrich v Paisner
rooms:toilets next to kitchens
1. Birmingham CC v Oakley
roots of trees, highway authorities responsible for
1. Delaware Mansions Ltd v City of Westminster
rough sleeping
1. Ogle v Bundhoo
safety net services
1. Introduction
sale of property:best price
1. Bradford and Bingley plc v Ross
2. Mortgage Express v Mardner
sale of property:ceasing to occupy before sale
1. R v Wandsworth LBC ex p Oteng
sale of property:compensation for former tenants
1. Clements v Simmonds
sale of property:connected or associated companies, sale to
1. Bradford and Bingley plc v Ross
2. Mortgage Express v Mardner
sale of property:early sales, prospects of
1. Target Home Loans v Clothier
sale of property:financial factors, taking into account
1. Polonski v Lloyds Bank Mortgages Ltd
sale of property:High Court
1. Cheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Krausz
sale of property:intention to live in property until sale
1. Rowe v Truelove
2. Lipton v Whitworth
sale of property:intentional homelessness
1. R v Wandsworth LBC ex p Oteng
sale of property:judicial sale
1. Zehentner v Austria
sale of property:landlords or members of family, premises required for
1. Rowe v Truelove
2. Lipton v Whitworth
3. Clements v Simmonds
sale of property:mortgage possession proceedings:best price, attainment of
1. Bradford and Bingley plc v Ross
2. Mortgage Express v Mardner
3. Raja v Lloyds TSB
sale of property:mortgage possession proceedings:connected or associated companies, sale to
1. Bradford and Bingley plc v Ross
2. Mortgage Express v Mardner
sale of property:mortgage possession proceedings:early sales, prospects of
1. Target Home Loans v Clothier
sale of property:mortgage possession proceedings:financial factors, taking into account
1. Polonski v Lloyds Bank Mortgages Ltd
sale of property:mortgage possession proceedings:High Court
1. Cheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Krausz
sale of property:mortgage possession proceedings:jurisdiction
1. Palk v Mortgage Services Funding
sale of property:mortgage possession proceedings:orders for sale
1. Bradford and Bingley plc v Ross
2. Mortgage Express v Mardner
3. Palk v Mortgage Services Funding
sale of property:mortgage possession proceedings:reasonable period
1. Bristol and West Building Society v Ellis
2. National and Provincial Building Society v Lloyd
sale of property:mortgage possession proceedings:rent arrears, payment of
1. National and Provincial Building Society v Lloyd
sale of property:mortgage possession proceedings:shortfall, leave where sale would leave a mortgage
1. Barrett v Halifax Building Society
sale of property:mortgage possession proceedings:social factors, taking into account
1. Polonski v Lloyds Bank Mortgages Ltd
sale of property:mortgage possession proceedings:suspended possession orders
1. Cheltenham and Gloucester plc v Booker
2. Target Home Loans v Clothier
3. Cheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Krausz
sale of property:mortgage possession proceedings:who should sell property
1. Mortgage Service Funding plc v Steele
sale of property:new houses abroad, landlords intending to build
1. Bissessar v Ghosn
sale of property:orders for sale
1. Bradford and Bingley plc v Ross
2. Mortgage Express v Mardner
3. Palk v Mortgage Services Funding
sale of property:prospective purchasers where no binding contract of sale
1. Bretherton v Paton
sale of property:reasonable period
1. Bristol and West Building Society v Ellis
2. National and Provincial Building Society v Lloyd
sale of property:rent arrears, payment of
1. National and Provincial Building Society v Lloyd
sale of property:shortfall, leave where sale would leave a mortgage
1. Barrett v Halifax Building Society
sale of property:social factors, taking into account
1. Polonski v Lloyds Bank Mortgages Ltd
sale of property:suspended possession orders
1. Cheltenham and Gloucester plc v Booker
2. Target Home Loans v Clothier
3. Cheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Krausz
sale of property:who should sell property
1. Mortgage Service Funding plc v Steele
same sex partners
1. Succession to assured tenancies
2. Southern Housing Group Ltd v Nutting
3. Fitzpatrick v Sterling Housing Association
4. Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza
scaffolding, erection of
1. Queensway Marketing Ltd v Associated Restaurants Ltd
school age, children of:EU nationals
1. Harrow LBC v Ibrahim
2. Teixeira v Lambeth LBC
school age, children of:homelessness assistance, eligibility for
1. Harrow LBC v Ibrahim
2. Teixeira v Lambeth LBC
school caretakers
1. Surrey CC v Lamond
schools, proximity of accommodation to:travel time
1. Williams v Birmingham CC
Scotland:assured tenancies
1. Laimond Properties Ltd v Al-Shakarchi
Scotland:change of landlord
1. Knowles Housing Association v Millar
Scotland:homelessness
1. R v Kyle and Carrick DC ex p Robson
Scotland:landlord condition
1. Knowles Housing Association v Millar
Scotland:settled accommodation and intentional homelessness
1. R v Kyle and Carrick DC ex p Robson
Scotland:subtenancies
1. McLoughlin’s Curator Bonis v Motherwell DC
secure tenancies:assignment
1. Burton v Camden LBC
2. Camden LBC v Goldenberg
3. Croydon LBC v Buston and Triance
4. Peabody Donation Fund v Higgins
5. Sanctuary Housing Association v Baker
secure tenancies:assured tenancies
1. Assured tenancy transitional provisions
secure tenancies:breach of obligations as ground for possession
1. Breach of obligation
2. Breach of obligation (Housing Act 1985 Sch 2 Ground 1)
3. Southwark LBC v O’Sullivan
4. Camden LBC v McBride
5. Kensington and Chelsea RLBC v Simmonds
6. Northampton BC v Lovatt
secure tenancies:change of landlord
1. Knowles Housing Association v Millar
secure tenancies:company lets
1. Company lets
secure tenancies:consent orders
1. R v Worthing BC ex p Bruce
secure tenancies:continuation of tenancies
1. The effect of possession orders – in general
secure tenancies:death of tenants
1. Death of tenant
2. Wandsworth LBC v Randall
secure tenancies:demolition or redevelopment, property required for
1. Property required for demolition or redevelopment
secure tenancies:employees, licences for
1. Licences – occupation granted to employees
secure tenancies:false statements
1. Tenancy obtained by false statement
2. Lewisham LBC v Adeyemi/Lewisham LBC v Akinsola
3. North Herts DC v Carthy
4. Rushcliffe BC v Watson
secure tenancies:form intention to return, where tenant could not
1. McLoughlin’s Curator Bonis v Motherwell DC
secure tenancies:former employees
1. Former employees
secure tenancies:fully mutual co-operative tenancies
1. Ali Bhai and Cabare v Black Roof CHA Ltd
secure tenancies:grounds for possession
1. Introduction
secure tenancies:introductory tenancies
1. Introductory tenancies
secure tenancies:landlord condition
1. Ali Bhai and Cabare v Black Roof CHA Ltd
2. Banjo v Brent LBC
3. Knowles Housing Association v Millar
secure tenancies:licences
1. Licences – occupation granted to employees
secure tenancies:local authority functions
1. Accommodation for Homeless Persons (Housing Act 1985, Sch 1 para 4)
secure tenancies:notification
1. Accommodation for Homeless Persons (Housing Act 1985, Sch 1 para 4)
secure tenancies:nuisance and annoyance
1. Anti-social behaviour
2. Anti-social behaviour (Housing Acts 1985 and 1988)
3. Croydon LBC v Crawford
4. Harlow DC v Sewell
5. Kensington Housing Trust v Oliver
6. Portsmouth CC v Bryant
7. Watford BC v Simpson
8. Sheffield CC v Fletcher
secure tenancies:occupation as a residence
1. Occupation as a residence; Rent Act 1977 s2(1)(a)
secure tenancies:overcrowding
1. Overcrowding
2. Overcrowding (Rent Act 1977 s101)
3. Henry Smith’s Charity Trustees v Bartosiak-Jentys
secure tenancies:possession orders
1. Introduction and general considerations
2. The effect of possession orders – in general
3. Suspension of warrants before execution
4. Setting aside warrants after execution
secure tenancies:rent
1. Variation of non-rent terms (secure tenants)
2. Rents (secure tenants)
3. R v Ealing LBC ex p Lewis
4. Wandsworth LBC v Winder (No 2)
5. Rent arrears (Housing Act 1985 Sch 2 Ground 1)
6. Notting Hill Housing Trust v Jones
7. Lewisham LBC v Simba-Tola
secure tenancies:rent regulation
1. Chouhan v The Earl’s High School
secure tenancies:resumption of occupation after loss
1. Hussey v Camden LBC
secure tenancies:right to buy
1. Jennings v Epping Forest DC
2. Muir Group Housing Association Ltd v Thornley
3. Sutton LBC v Swann
secure tenancies:Scotland
1. Knowles Housing Association v Millar
secure tenancies:subtenancies
1. Hussey v Camden LBC
2. Jennings v Epping Forest DC
3. Muir Group Housing Association Ltd v Thornley
4. Sutton LBC v Swann
5. McLoughlin’s Curator Bonis v Motherwell DC
6. Subletting the whole of premises
secure tenancies:succession
1. Succession to secure tenancies
2. Austin v Southwark LBC
3. Birmingham CC v Walker
4. Waltham Forest LBC v Thomas
5. Bassetlaw DC v Renshaw
6. Brent LBC v Fofana
7. Epping Forest DC v Pomphrett
8. Islington LBC v Freeman
9. Marsh v Lewisham LBC
10. Michalak v Wandsworth LBC
11. Newham LBC v Phillips
12. Newham LBC v Ria
13. Peabody Donation Fund Governors v Grant
14. Sheffield CC v Wall
15. Sheffield CC v Wall (No 2)
16. Westminster CC v Peart
17. Sharp v Brent LBC
secure tenancies:succession by minor
1. Kingston upon Thames RLBC v Prince
secure tenancies:suitable alternative accommodation
1. Suitable alternative accommodation
secure tenancies:utilities
1. Rochdale BC v Dixon
secure tenancies:variation of agreement
1. Rochdale BC v Dixon
secure tenancies:warrants of possession
1. Suspension of warrants before execution
2. Setting aside warrants after execution
secure tenancies:will, tenancies at
1. Banjo v Brent LBC
secure tenancies and security of tenure:assignment
1. Assignments (secure tenants)
2. Burton v Camden LBC
3. Camden LBC v Goldenberg
4. Croydon LBC v Buston and Triance
5. Peabody Donation Fund v Higgins
6. Sanctuary Housing Association v Baker
secure tenancies and security of tenure:business tenancies
1. Business tenancies (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 11, Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 4 and Rent Act 1977 s24)
2. Broadway Investments Hackney Ltd v Grant
3. Cheryl Investments Ltd v Saldanha
4. Gurton v Parrott
5. Lewis v Weldcrest Ltd
6. Pulleng v Curran
7. Tan v Sitkowski
8. Wagle v Trustees of Henry Smith’s Charity Kensington Estate
9. Wright v Mortimer
secure tenancies and security of tenure:consultation
1. Housing management and consultation (secure tenants)
secure tenancies and security of tenure:death and succession
1. Succession to secure tenancies
2. Austin v Southwark LBC
3. Birmingham CC v Walker
4. Waltham Forest LBC v Thomas
5. Bassetlaw DC v Renshaw
6. Brent LBC v Fofana
7. Epping Forest DC v Pomphrett
8. Islington LBC v Freeman
9. Marsh v Lewisham LBC
10. Michalak v Wandsworth LBC
11. Newham LBC v Phillips
12. Newham LBC v Ria
13. Peabody Donation Fund Governors v Grant
14. Sheffield CC v Wall
15. Sheffield CC v Wall (No 2)
16. Westminster CC v Peart
17. Sharp v Brent LBC
secure tenancies and security of tenure:definition
1. Introduction
secure tenancies and security of tenure:employees
1. Employees (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 2)
2. Hughes v Greenwich LBC
3. Brent LBC v Charles
4. Elvidge v Coventry CC
5. Greenfield v Berkshire CC
6. Holmes v South Yorkshire Police Authority
7. South Glamorgan CC v Griffiths
8. Surrey CC v Lamond
9. Godsmark v Greenwich LBC
10. Wragg v Surrey CC
secure tenancies and security of tenure:exceptions
1. Introduction
secure tenancies and security of tenure:landlord condition
1. The landlord condition
2. Ali Bhai and Cabare v Black Roof CHA Ltd
3. Banjo v Brent LBC
4. R v Plymouth CC and Cornwall CC ex p Freeman
5. Knowles Housing Association v Millar
secure tenancies and security of tenure:management
1. Housing management and consultation (secure tenants)
secure tenancies and security of tenure:only or principal home, occupation as
1. Occupation as only or principal home: Housing Act 1985 s81 and Housing Act 1988 s1(1)(b); Prohibition against subletting: Housing Act 1985 s93 and Housing Act 1988 s15A
2. Brent LBC v Cronin
3. Crawley BC v Sawyer
4. Gay v Sheeran
5. Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Clarke
6. Hussey v Camden LBC
7. Jennings v Epping Forest DC
8. Lambeth LBC v Vandra
9. Merton LBC v Salama
10. Muir Group Housing Association Ltd v Thornley
11. Sutton LBC v Swann
12. Ujima Housing Association v Ansah
13. Amoah v Barking and Dagenham LBC
14. Waltham Forest CBHA v Fanning
15. Notting Hill Housing Trust v Etoria
16. McLoughlin’s Curator Bonis v Motherwell DC
secure tenancies and security of tenure:private sector leasing
1. Private sector leasing (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 6)
2. Haringey LBC v Hickey
3. Tower Hamlets LBC v Abdi
4. Tower Hamlets LBC v Miah
5. Westminster CC v Boraliu
secure tenancies and security of tenure:reasonable rents
1. Rents (secure tenants)
2. R v Ealing LBC ex p Lewis
3. Wandsworth LBC v Winder (No 2)
secure tenancies and security of tenure:separate dwelling, let as a
1. Let as a separate dwelling
2. Goodrich v Paisner
3. Uratemp Ventures Ltd v Collins
4. Westminster CC v Clarke
5. Gray v Brown
6. Grosvenor Estates Belgravia v Cochran
7. Horford Investments v Lambert
8. Kavanagh v Lyroudias
9. Mansfield DC v Langridge
10. Miller v Eyo
11. Mortgage Corporation v Ubah
12. Parkins v Westminster CC
13. St Catherine’s College v Dorling
14. Tyler v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
15. R v Rent Officer of Nottinghamshire Registration Area ex p Allen
16. Andrews v Brewer
17. Tomkins v Basildon DC
18. Webb v Barnet LBC
secure tenancies and security of tenure:temporary use pending development
1. Temporary use pending development (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 3)
2. Attley v Cherwell DC
3. Hyde Housing Association Ltd v Harrison
4. Lillieshall Road Housing Co-operative Ltd v Brennan
secure tenancies and security of tenure:variation of non-rent terms
1. Variation of non-rent terms (secure tenants)
2. Palmer v Sandwell MBC
3. R (Kilby) v Basildon DC
4. R v Brent LBC ex p Blatt
security of tenure
1. Introduction
security of tenure: death and succession
1. Solihull MBC v Hickin
security of tenure:assignment
1. Assignments (secure tenants)
2. Burton v Camden LBC
3. Camden LBC v Goldenberg
4. Croydon LBC v Buston and Triance
5. Peabody Donation Fund v Higgins
6. Sanctuary Housing Association v Baker
security of tenure:assured shorthold tenancies
1. Introduction
security of tenure:assured tenancies:board and attendance
1. Board and attendance
security of tenure:assured tenancies:business tenancies
1. Business tenancies (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 11, Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 4 and Rent Act 1977 s24)
2. Broadway Investments Hackney Ltd v Grant
3. Cheryl Investments Ltd v Saldanha
4. Gurton v Parrott
5. Lewis v Weldcrest Ltd
6. Pulleng v Curran
7. Tan v Sitkowski
8. Wagle v Trustees of Henry Smith’s Charity Kensington Estate
9. Wright v Mortimer
security of tenure:assured tenancies:definition
1. Introduction
security of tenure:assured tenancies:exceptions
1. Introduction
2. Business tenancies (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 11, Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 4 and Rent Act 1977 s24)
3. Broadway Investments Hackney Ltd v Grant
4. Cheryl Investments Ltd v Saldanha
5. Gurton v Parrott
6. Lewis v Weldcrest Ltd
7. Pulleng v Curran
8. Tan v Sitkowski
9. Wagle v Trustees of Henry Smith’s Charity Kensington Estate
10. Wright v Mortimer
11. Holiday lets (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 9 and Rent Act 1977 s9)
12. Buchmann v May
13. Killick v Roberts
14. R v Rent Officer for Camden LBC ex p Plant
15. McHale v Daneham
security of tenure:assured tenancies:high or low rent, tenancies at a
1. Tenancies at a high or low rent (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 paras 2 and 3 and Rent Act 1977 ss4–5)
2. Bostock v Bryant and Another
security of tenure:assured tenancies:holiday lets
1. Holiday lets (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 9 and Rent Act 1977 s9)
2. Buchmann v May
3. Killick v Roberts
4. R v Rent Officer for Camden LBC ex p Plant
5. McHale v Daneham
security of tenure:assured tenancies:only or principal home, occupation as
1. Occupation as only or principal home: Housing Act 1985 s81 and Housing Act 1988 s1(1)(b); Prohibition against subletting: Housing Act 1985 s93 and Housing Act 1988 s15A
2. Brent LBC v Cronin
3. Crawley BC v Sawyer
4. Gay v Sheeran
5. Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Clarke
6. Hussey v Camden LBC
7. Jennings v Epping Forest DC
8. Lambeth LBC v Vandra
9. Merton LBC v Salama
10. Muir Group Housing Association Ltd v Thornley
11. Sutton LBC v Swann
12. Ujima Housing Association v Ansah
13. Amoah v Barking and Dagenham LBC
14. Waltham Forest CBHA v Fanning
15. Notting Hill Housing Trust v Etoria
16. McLoughlin’s Curator Bonis v Motherwell DC
security of tenure:assured tenancies:rent
1. Rent regulation (assured tenants)
2. Riverside Housing Association Ltd v White
3. Bankway Properties v Dunsford
4. Contour Homes Ltd v Rowen
5. Hughes v Borodex Ltd
6. R (Lester) v London Rent Assessment Committee
7. R (Morris) v London Rent Assessment Committee
8. Tadema Holdings v Ferguson
9. Earl of Cadogan v Chehab
10. Ghani v London Rent Assessment Committee
11. London District Properties Management Ltd v Goolamy
12. N & D (London) Ltd v Gadson
13. R v London Rent Assessment Panel ex p Cadogan Estates
14. R (Innes) v Northern Rent Assessment Panel
15. Rowe v South West Rent Assessment Panel
security of tenure:assured tenancies:resident landlords
1. Resident landlords (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 10 and Rent Act 1977 s12)
2. Bardrick v Haycock
3. Barnes v Goresuch
4. Cooper v Tait
5. Griffiths v English
6. Jackson v Pekic
7. Lewis-Graham v Conacher
8. O’Sullivan v Barnett
9. Palmer v McNamara
10. Wolff v Waddington
security of tenure:assured tenancies:separate dwelling, let as a
1. Let as a separate dwelling
2. Goodrich v Paisner
3. Uratemp Ventures Ltd v Collins
4. Westminster CC v Clarke
5. Gray v Brown
6. Grosvenor Estates Belgravia v Cochran
7. Horford Investments v Lambert
8. Kavanagh v Lyroudias
9. Mansfield DC v Langridge
10. Miller v Eyo
11. Mortgage Corporation v Ubah
12. Parkins v Westminster CC
13. St Catherine’s College v Dorling
14. Tyler v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
15. R v Rent Officer of Nottinghamshire Registration Area ex p Allen
16. Andrews v Brewer
17. Tomkins v Basildon DC
18. Webb v Barnet LBC
security of tenure:assured tenancies:succession
1. Succession to assured tenancies
2. Southern Housing Group Ltd v Nutting
security of tenure:assured tenancies:transitional provisions
1. Assured tenancy transitional provisions
2. Laimond Properties Ltd v Al-Shakarchi
3. Rajah v Arogol Co Ltd
4. Secretarial Nominee Co Ltd v Thomas
5. Truro Diocesan Board of Finance Ltd v Foley
6. Crown Estate Commissioners v Governors of the Peabody Trust
7. Goringe v Twinsectra Ltd
8. Kotecha v Rimington
security of tenure:assured tenancies:variation of non-rent terms
1. Variation of non-rent terms (secure tenants)
security of tenure:bankruptcy and possession claims
1. Possession claims and bankruptcy
2. Harlow DC v Hall
security of tenure:board and attendance
1. Board and attendance
2. Otter v Norman
3. Nelson Developments Ltd v Taboada
4. Rita Dale v Adrahill Ltd
security of tenure:business tenancies
1. Business tenancies (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 11, Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 4 and Rent Act 1977 s24)
2. Broadway Investments Hackney Ltd v Grant
3. Cheryl Investments Ltd v Saldanha
4. Gurton v Parrott
5. Lewis v Weldcrest Ltd
6. Pulleng v Curran
7. Tan v Sitkowski
8. Wagle v Trustees of Henry Smith’s Charity Kensington Estate
9. Wright v Mortimer
security of tenure:committal for breach of injunctions
1. Injunctions against tenants and third parties
2. Barnet LBC v Hurst
3. Birmingham CC v Flatt
4. Leicester CC v Lewis
5. Longhurst Homes Ltd v Killen
6. Manchester CC v McCann
7. Manchester CC v Worthington
8. Medina Housing Association v Connolly
9. Middlesbrough BC v Turnbull
10. Nottingham CC v Cutts
11. Stafford BC v Haynes
12. Tower Hamlets LBC v Long
13. Wear Valley DC v Robson
security of tenure:common law tenancies
1. Introduction
security of tenure:company lets
1. Company lets
2. Eaton Square Properties Ltd v O’Higgins
3. Estavest Investments Ltd v Commercial Express Travel Ltd
4. Hilton v Plustitle Ltd
5. Kaye v Massbetter Ltd and Kanter
6. Navinter SA v Pastoll
security of tenure:consultation
1. Housing management and consultation (secure tenants)
security of tenure:county court claims
1. Administrative law and human rights defences
security of tenure:curtilage of buildings held for other purposes, within
1. Employees (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 2)
security of tenure:death and succession
1. Succession to secure tenancies
2. Austin v Southwark LBC
3. Birmingham CC v Walker
4. Waltham Forest LBC v Thomas
5. Bassetlaw DC v Renshaw
6. Brent LBC v Fofana
7. Epping Forest DC v Pomphrett
8. Islington LBC v Freeman
9. Marsh v Lewisham LBC
10. Michalak v Wandsworth LBC
11. Newham LBC v Phillips
12. Newham LBC v Ria
13. Peabody Donation Fund Governors v Grant
14. Sheffield CC v Wall
15. Sheffield CC v Wall (No 2)
16. Westminster CC v Peart
17. Sharp v Brent LBC
security of tenure:development, temporary use pending
1. Temporary use pending development (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 3)
2. Attley v Cherwell DC
3. Hyde Housing Association Ltd v Harrison
4. Lillieshall Road Housing Co-operative Ltd v Brennan
security of tenure:employees
1. Employees (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 2)
2. Hughes v Greenwich LBC
3. Brent LBC v Charles
4. Elvidge v Coventry CC
5. Greenfield v Berkshire CC
6. Holmes v South Yorkshire Police Authority
7. South Glamorgan CC v Griffiths
8. Surrey CC v Lamond
9. Godsmark v Greenwich LBC
10. Wragg v Surrey CC
security of tenure:exceptions
1. Introduction
security of tenure:exclusions
1. Temporary use pending development (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 3)
2. Attley v Cherwell DC
3. Hyde Housing Association Ltd v Harrison
4. Lillieshall Road Housing Co-operative Ltd v Brennan
5. Business tenancies (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 11, Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 4 and Rent Act 1977 s24)
6. Broadway Investments Hackney Ltd v Grant
7. Cheryl Investments Ltd v Saldanha
8. Gurton v Parrott
9. Lewis v Weldcrest Ltd
10. Pulleng v Curran
11. Tan v Sitkowski
12. Wagle v Trustees of Henry Smith’s Charity Kensington Estate
13. Wright v Mortimer
14. Tenancies at a high or low rent (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 paras 2 and 3 and Rent Act 1977 ss4–5)
15. Bostock v Bryant and Another
security of tenure:functional public authorities, housing associations as
1. Poplar Housing and Regeneration Community Association Ltd v Donoghue
security of tenure:harassment and illegal eviction
1. Civil proceedings
security of tenure:high or low rent, tenancies at a
1. Tenancies at a high or low rent (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 paras 2 and 3 and Rent Act 1977 ss4–5)
2. Bostock v Bryant and Another
security of tenure:holiday lets
1. Holiday lets (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 9 and Rent Act 1977 s9)
2. Buchmann v May
3. Killick v Roberts
4. R v Rent Officer for Camden LBC ex p Plant
5. McHale v Daneham
security of tenure:home loss and disturbance payments
1. Home loss and disturbance payments
security of tenure:housing associations as public authorities
1. Poplar Housing and Regeneration Community Association Ltd v Donoghue
security of tenure:Human Rights Act 1998
1. Poplar Housing and Regeneration Community Association Ltd v Donoghue
security of tenure:hybrid authorities
1. Administrative law and human rights defences
security of tenure:implied surrender
1. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Quigley
security of tenure:improper exercise of powers
1. Administrative law and human rights defences
security of tenure:injunctions against tenants
1. Manchester CC v Lawler
2. Injunctions against tenants and third parties
3. Accent Foundation Ltd v Lee
4. Caradon DC v Paton
5. Manchester CC v Lee
6. Moat Housing Group South Ltd v Harris and Hartless
7. Nottingham CC v Zain (a minor)
8. Southwark LBC v Storrie
9. Hillingdon LBC v Vijayatunga
10. Sandwell MBC v Preece
security of tenure:introductory tenancies
1. Introductory tenancies
security of tenure:judicial review of eviction decisions
1. Administrative law and human rights defences
security of tenure:landlord condition
1. The landlord condition
2. Ali Bhai and Cabare v Black Roof CHA Ltd
3. Banjo v Brent LBC
4. R v Plymouth CC and Cornwall CC ex p Freeman
5. Knowles Housing Association v Millar
security of tenure:licences
1. The distinction between tenancies and licences – generally
security of tenure:licence/tenancy distinction
1. The distinction between tenancies and licences – generally
security of tenure:management
1. Housing management and consultation (secure tenants)
security of tenure:mandatory nature of possession
1. Poplar Housing and Regeneration Community Association Ltd v Donoghue
security of tenure:mixed business/residential use
1. Wagle v Trustees of Henry Smith’s Charity Kensington Estate
security of tenure:notice to quit
1. Introduction
security of tenure:obligations
1. Injunctions against tenants and third parties
2. Accent Foundation Ltd v Lee
3. Caradon DC v Paton
security of tenure:only or principal home, occupation as
1. Occupation as only or principal home: Housing Act 1985 s81 and Housing Act 1988 s1(1)(b); Prohibition against subletting: Housing Act 1985 s93 and Housing Act 1988 s15A
2. Brent LBC v Cronin
3. Crawley BC v Sawyer
4. Gay v Sheeran
5. Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Clarke
6. Hussey v Camden LBC
7. Jennings v Epping Forest DC
8. Lambeth LBC v Vandra
9. Merton LBC v Salama
10. Muir Group Housing Association Ltd v Thornley
11. Sutton LBC v Swann
12. Ujima Housing Association v Ansah
13. Amoah v Barking and Dagenham LBC
14. Waltham Forest CBHA v Fanning
15. Notting Hill Housing Trust v Etoria
16. McLoughlin’s Curator Bonis v Motherwell DC
security of tenure:part of premises, occupation of
1. Broadway Investments Hackney Ltd v Grant
security of tenure:possession orders
1. Administrative law and human rights defences
security of tenure:possession proceedings
1. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Quigley
2. Possession claims and bankruptcy
3. Harlow DC v Hall
security of tenure:private and family life and home, right to respect for
1. Administrative law and human rights defences
2. Poplar Housing and Regeneration Community Association Ltd v Donoghue
security of tenure:private sector leasing
1. Private sector leasing (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 6)
2. Haringey LBC v Hickey
3. Tower Hamlets LBC v Abdi
4. Tower Hamlets LBC v Miah
5. Westminster CC v Boraliu
security of tenure:proportionality
1. Administrative law and human rights defences
security of tenure:public authorities: functional public authorities, housing associations as
1. Poplar Housing and Regeneration Community Association Ltd v Donoghue
security of tenure:public authorities:housing associations
1. Poplar Housing and Regeneration Community Association Ltd v Donoghue
security of tenure:public authorities:Human Rights Act 1998
1. Poplar Housing and Regeneration Community Association Ltd v Donoghue
security of tenure:public authorities:hybrids
1. Administrative law and human rights defences
security of tenure:rent:assured tenancies
1. Rent regulation (assured tenants)
2. Riverside Housing Association Ltd v White
3. Bankway Properties v Dunsford
4. Contour Homes Ltd v Rowen
5. Hughes v Borodex Ltd
6. R (Lester) v London Rent Assessment Committee
7. R (Morris) v London Rent Assessment Committee
8. Tadema Holdings v Ferguson
9. Earl of Cadogan v Chehab
10. Ghani v London Rent Assessment Committee
11. London District Properties Management Ltd v Goolamy
12. N & D (London) Ltd v Gadson
13. R v London Rent Assessment Panel ex p Cadogan Estates
14. R (Innes) v Northern Rent Assessment Panel
15. Rowe v South West Rent Assessment Panel
security of tenure:rent:reasonable rents
1. Rents (secure tenants)
2. R v Ealing LBC ex p Lewis
3. Wandsworth LBC v Winder (No 2)
security of tenure:rent:regulation
1. Rent regulation (assured tenants)
2. Rent regulation (Rent Act 1977 tenants)
security of tenure:rent:secure tenancies
1. Rents (secure tenants)
2. R v Ealing LBC ex p Lewis
3. Wandsworth LBC v Winder (No 2)
security of tenure:Rent Act tenancies:board and attendance
1. Board and attendance
2. Otter v Norman
3. Nelson Developments Ltd v Taboada
4. Rita Dale v Adrahill Ltd
security of tenure:Rent Act tenancies:business tenancies
1. Business tenancies (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 11, Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 4 and Rent Act 1977 s24)
2. Broadway Investments Hackney Ltd v Grant
3. Cheryl Investments Ltd v Saldanha
4. Gurton v Parrott
5. Lewis v Weldcrest Ltd
6. Pulleng v Curran
7. Tan v Sitkowski
8. Wagle v Trustees of Henry Smith’s Charity Kensington Estate
9. Wright v Mortimer
security of tenure:Rent Act tenancies:definition
1. Introduction
security of tenure:Rent Act tenancies:exceptions
1. Introduction
2. Business tenancies (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 11, Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 4 and Rent Act 1977 s24)
3. Broadway Investments Hackney Ltd v Grant
4. Cheryl Investments Ltd v Saldanha
5. Gurton v Parrott
6. Lewis v Weldcrest Ltd
7. Pulleng v Curran
8. Tan v Sitkowski
9. Wagle v Trustees of Henry Smith’s Charity Kensington Estate
10. Wright v Mortimer
11. Holiday lets (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 9 and Rent Act 1977 s9)
12. Buchmann v May
13. Killick v Roberts
14. R v Rent Officer for Camden LBC ex p Plant
15. McHale v Daneham
16. Resident landlords (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 10 and Rent Act 1977 s12)
17. Bardrick v Haycock
18. Barnes v Goresuch
19. Cooper v Tait
20. Griffiths v English
security of tenure:Rent Act tenancies:holiday lets
1. Holiday lets (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 9 and Rent Act 1977 s9)
2. Buchmann v May
3. Killick v Roberts
4. R v Rent Officer for Camden LBC ex p Plant
5. McHale v Daneham
security of tenure:Rent Act tenancies:residence, occupation as
1. Occupation as a residence; Rent Act 1977 s2(1)(a)
2. Hampstead Way Investments Ltd v Lewis-Weare
3. Bevington v Crawford
4. Blanway Investments Ltd v Lynch
5. Brickfield Properties Ltd v Hughes
6. Brown v Brash
7. Carphone Warehouse UK Ltd v Malekout
8. Gofor Investments v Roberts
9. Hall v King
10. Moreland Properties (UK) Ltd v Dhokia
11. Prince v Robinson
12. Regalian Securities Ltd v Scheuer
13. Richards v Green
14. Stephens v Kerr
15. Tickner v Hearn
16. Wigley v Leigh
security of tenure:Rent Act tenancies:resident landlords
1. Resident landlords (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 10 and Rent Act 1977 s12)
2. Bardrick v Haycock
3. Barnes v Goresuch
4. Cooper v Tait
5. Griffiths v English
6. Jackson v Pekic
7. Lewis-Graham v Conacher
8. O’Sullivan v Barnett
9. Palmer v McNamara
10. Wolff v Waddington
security of tenure:Rent Act tenancies:separate dwelling, let as a
1. Let as a separate dwelling
2. Goodrich v Paisner
3. Uratemp Ventures Ltd v Collins
4. Westminster CC v Clarke
5. Gray v Brown
6. Grosvenor Estates Belgravia v Cochran
7. Horford Investments v Lambert
8. Kavanagh v Lyroudias
9. Mansfield DC v Langridge
10. Miller v Eyo
11. Mortgage Corporation v Ubah
12. Parkins v Westminster CC
13. St Catherine’s College v Dorling
14. Tyler v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
15. R v Rent Officer of Nottinghamshire Registration Area ex p Allen
16. Andrews v Brewer
17. Tomkins v Basildon DC
18. Webb v Barnet LBC
security of tenure:Rent Act tenancies:succession
1. Succession to Rent Act tenancies
2. Carega Properties SA v Sharratt
3. Fitzpatrick v Sterling Housing Association
4. Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza
5. Brock v Wollams
6. Chios Investment Property Co v Lopez
7. Clore v MacNicol
8. Daejan Properties Ltd v Mahoney
9. Hedgedale Ltd v Hards
10. Hildebrand v Moon
11. Sefton Holdings Ltd v Cairns
12. Swanbrae Ltd v Elliott
13. Tennant v Hutton
14. Portman Registrars v Mohammed Latif
security of tenure:residence, occupation as
1. Occupation as a residence; Rent Act 1977 s2(1)(a)
2. Hampstead Way Investments Ltd v Lewis-Weare
3. Bevington v Crawford
4. Blanway Investments Ltd v Lynch
5. Brickfield Properties Ltd v Hughes
6. Brown v Brash
7. Carphone Warehouse UK Ltd v Malekout
8. Gofor Investments v Roberts
9. Hall v King
10. Moreland Properties (UK) Ltd v Dhokia
11. Prince v Robinson
12. Regalian Securities Ltd v Scheuer
13. Richards v Green
14. Stephens v Kerr
15. Tickner v Hearn
16. Wigley v Leigh
security of tenure:resident landlords
1. Resident landlords (Housing Act 1988 Sch 1 para 10 and Rent Act 1977 s12)
2. Bardrick v Haycock
3. Barnes v Goresuch
4. Cooper v Tait
5. Griffiths v English
6. Jackson v Pekic
7. Lewis-Graham v Conacher
8. O’Sullivan v Barnett
9. Palmer v McNamara
10. Wolff v Waddington
security of tenure:restrictions
1. Injunctions against tenants and third parties
2. Accent Foundation Ltd v Lee
3. Caradon DC v Paton
security of tenure:rights
1. Injunctions against tenants and third parties
2. Accent Foundation Ltd v Lee
3. Caradon DC v Paton
security of tenure:separate dwelling, let as a
1. Let as a separate dwelling
2. Goodrich v Paisner
3. Uratemp Ventures Ltd v Collins
4. Westminster CC v Clarke
5. Gray v Brown
6. Grosvenor Estates Belgravia v Cochran
7. Horford Investments v Lambert
8. Kavanagh v Lyroudias
9. Mansfield DC v Langridge
10. Miller v Eyo
11. Mortgage Corporation v Ubah
12. Parkins v Westminster CC
13. St Catherine’s College v Dorling
14. Tyler v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
15. R v Rent Officer of Nottinghamshire Registration Area ex p Allen
16. Andrews v Brewer
17. Tomkins v Basildon DC
18. Webb v Barnet LBC
security of tenure:subtenancies, prohibition of
1. Occupation as only or principal home: Housing Act 1985 s81 and Housing Act 1988 s1(1)(b); Prohibition against subletting: Housing Act 1985 s93 and Housing Act 1988 s15A
2. Brent LBC v Cronin
3. Crawley BC v Sawyer
4. Gay v Sheeran
5. Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Clarke
6. Hussey v Camden LBC
7. Jennings v Epping Forest DC
8. Lambeth LBC v Vandra
9. Merton LBC v Salama
10. Muir Group Housing Association Ltd v Thornley
11. Sutton LBC v Swann
12. Ujima Housing Association v Ansah
13. Amoah v Barking and Dagenham LBC
14. Waltham Forest CBHA v Fanning
15. Notting Hill Housing Trust v Etoria
16. McLoughlin’s Curator Bonis v Motherwell DC
security of tenure:succession:assured tenancies
1. Succession to assured tenancies
2. Southern Housing Group Ltd v Nutting
security of tenure:succession:Rent Act tenancies
1. Succession to Rent Act tenancies
2. Carega Properties SA v Sharratt
3. Fitzpatrick v Sterling Housing Association
4. Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza
5. Brock v Wollams
6. Chios Investment Property Co v Lopez
7. Clore v MacNicol
8. Daejan Properties Ltd v Mahoney
9. Hedgedale Ltd v Hards
10. Hildebrand v Moon
11. Sefton Holdings Ltd v Cairns
12. Swanbrae Ltd v Elliott
13. Tennant v Hutton
14. Portman Registrars v Mohammed Latif
security of tenure:succession:secure tenancies
1. Succession to secure tenancies
2. Austin v Southwark LBC
3. Birmingham CC v Walker
4. Waltham Forest LBC v Thomas
5. Bassetlaw DC v Renshaw
6. Brent LBC v Fofana
7. Epping Forest DC v Pomphrett
8. Islington LBC v Freeman
9. Marsh v Lewisham LBC
10. Michalak v Wandsworth LBC
11. Newham LBC v Phillips
12. Newham LBC v Ria
13. Peabody Donation Fund Governors v Grant
14. Sheffield CC v Wall
15. Sheffield CC v Wall (No 2)
16. Westminster CC v Peart
17. Sharp v Brent LBC
security of tenure:surrender, implied
1. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Quigley
security of tenure:suspension of warrants before execution
1. Suspension of warrants before execution
security of tenure:temporary use pending development
1. Temporary use pending development (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 3)
2. Attley v Cherwell DC
3. Hyde Housing Association Ltd v Harrison
4. Lillieshall Road Housing Co-operative Ltd v Brennan
security of tenure:Tenant’s Charter
1. Housing management and consultation (secure tenants)
security of tenure:variation of non-rent terms
1. Variation of non-rent terms (secure tenants)
2. Palmer v Sandwell MBC
3. R (Kilby) v Basildon DC
4. R v Brent LBC ex p Blatt
security of tenure:without security, tenure
1. Administrative law and human rights defences
2. Poplar Housing and Regeneration Community Association Ltd v Donoghue
3. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Quigley
sensitive tenants next to each other, placing
1. Brent LBC v Doughan
sentencing:contempt of court
1. Barnet LBC v Hurst
2. Longhurst Homes Ltd v Killen
3. Middlesbrough BC v Turnbull
4. Nottingham CC v Cutts
5. Sandwell MBC v Preece
sentencing:custodial sentences
1. Birmingham CC v Flatt
2. Tower Hamlets LBC v Long
3. Wear Valley DC v Robson
sentencing:hearsay
1. Wear Valley DC v Robson
sentencing:injunctions, breach of
1. Barnet LBC v Hurst
2. Longhurst Homes Ltd v Killen
3. Middlesbrough BC v Turnbull
4. Nottingham CC v Cutts
5. Sandwell MBC v Preece
6. Stafford BC v Haynes
7. Tower Hamlets LBC v Long
8. Wear Valley DC v Robson
sentencing:length
1. Barnet LBC v Hurst
sentencing:limited admissions
1. Barnet LBC v Hurst
sentencing:lynch mob behaviour
1. Tower Hamlets LBC v Long
sentencing:manifest unfairness
1. Nottingham CC v Cutts
sentencing:ouster injunctions, breach of
1. Leicester CC v Lewis
sentencing:suspended sentence, activation of
1. Sandwell MBC v Preece
sentencing:terrorised, where neighbours are
1. Wear Valley DC v Robson
sentencing:time on remand
1. R (James) v HM Prison Birmingham and others
sentencing:totality, principle of
1. Sandwell MBC v Preece
sentencing:violence, where there is no
1. Longhurst Homes Ltd v Killen
sentencing:worst cases, maximum sentences for
1. Middlesbrough BC v Turnbull
separate dwelling, let as a
1. Let as a separate dwelling
2. Goodrich v Paisner
3. Uratemp Ventures Ltd v Collins
4. Westminster CC v Clarke
5. Gray v Brown
6. Grosvenor Estates Belgravia v Cochran
7. Horford Investments v Lambert
8. Kavanagh v Lyroudias
9. Mansfield DC v Langridge
10. Miller v Eyo
11. Mortgage Corporation v Ubah
12. Parkins v Westminster CC
13. St Catherine’s College v Dorling
14. Tyler v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
15. R v Rent Officer of Nottinghamshire Registration Area ex p Allen
16. Andrews v Brewer
17. Tomkins v Basildon DC
18. Webb v Barnet LBC
separate dwelling, let as a:adjoining premises
1. Kavanagh v Lyroudias
separate dwelling, let as a:assured shorthold tenancies
1. Andrews v Brewer
separate dwelling, let as a:basements let under head leases
1. Grosvenor Estates Belgravia v Cochran
separate dwelling, let as a:business tenancies
1. Andrews v Brewer
2. Tomkins v Basildon DC
3. Webb v Barnet LBC
separate dwelling, let as a:buying other flat, loss of licence on
1. Tyler v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
separate dwelling, let as a:caravans moved from time to time
1. R v Rent Officer of Nottinghamshire Registration Area ex p Allen
separate dwelling, let as a:common rooms, use of
1. Goodrich v Paisner
separate dwelling, let as a:contingent on tenancy of other flat, where licence is
1. Tyler v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
separate dwelling, let as a:cooking facilities
1. Uratemp Ventures Ltd v Collins
separate dwelling, let as a:dwelling, definition of
1. Uratemp Ventures Ltd v Collins
separate dwelling, let as a:exclusive possession
1. Westminster CC v Clarke
2. Mansfield DC v Langridge
separate dwelling, let as a:hostels
1. Westminster CC v Clarke
separate dwelling, let as a:licences
1. Mansfield DC v Langridge
2. Parkins v Westminster CC
3. Tyler v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
separate dwelling, let as a:mixed business/residential use
1. Webb v Barnet LBC
separate dwelling, let as a:rent
1. Mansfield DC v Langridge
separate dwelling, let as a:reservation of right for landlords to live on premises, clear words needed for
1. Gray v Brown
2. Miller v Eyo
separate dwelling, let as a:security of tenure
1. Let as a separate dwelling
2. Goodrich v Paisner
3. Uratemp Ventures Ltd v Collins
4. Westminster CC v Clarke
5. Gray v Brown
6. Grosvenor Estates Belgravia v Cochran
7. Horford Investments v Lambert
8. Kavanagh v Lyroudias
9. Mansfield DC v Langridge
10. Miller v Eyo
11. Mortgage Corporation v Ubah
12. Parkins v Westminster CC
13. St Catherine’s College v Dorling
14. Tyler v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
15. R v Rent Officer of Nottinghamshire Registration Area ex p Allen
16. Andrews v Brewer
17. Tomkins v Basildon DC
18. Webb v Barnet LBC
separate dwelling, let as a:several dwellings, premises let as
1. Horford Investments v Lambert
separate dwelling, let as a:shared council houses
1. Parkins v Westminster CC
separate dwelling, let as a:sharing with landlords
1. Goodrich v Paisner
2. Gray v Brown
3. Miller v Eyo
4. Mortgage Corporation v Ubah
separate dwelling, let as a:termination of business leases
1. Tomkins v Basildon DC
separate dwelling, let as a:units, houses let as number of
1. St Catherine’s College v Dorling
service charges and long leases:accounts of overpayments, need for detailed
1. St Mary’s Mansions Ltd v Limegate Investment Co Ltd
service charges and long leases:arrears
1. Sella House Ltd v Mears
service charges and long leases:building contracts, expenses of
1. Capital and Counties Freehold Equity Trust Ltd v BL plc
service charges and long leases:certainty
1. Hackney LBC v Thompson
2. Sella House Ltd v Mears
service charges and long leases:change of circumstances
1. Pole Properties Ltd v Feinberg
service charges and long leases:clarity
1. Sella House Ltd v Mears
service charges and long leases:construction of provisions
1. Adelphi (Estates) Ltd v Christie
2. Billson v Tristrem
3. Blatherwick (Services) Ltd v King
4. Boldmark Ltd v Cohen
5. Gilje v Charlegrove Securities Ltd
6. Hackney LBC v Thompson
7. Northways Flats Management Co (Camden) Ltd v Wimpey Pension Trustees Ltd
8. Pole Properties Ltd v Feinberg
9. St Mary’s Mansions Ltd v Limegate Investment Co Ltd
10. Unchained Growth III plc v Granby Village (Manchester) Management Co Ltd
11. Universities Superannuation Scheme Ltd v Marks & Spencer plc
12. Capital and Counties Freehold Equity Trust Ltd v BL plc
13. Frobisher (Second Investments) Ltd v Kiloran Trust Co Ltd
14. Mullaney v Maybourne Grange (Croydon) Management Co Ltd
15. New England Properties plc v Portsmouth News Shops Ltd
16. Holding and Management Ltd v Property Holding and Investment Trust plc
17. Sella House Ltd v Mears
18. Primeridge Ltd v Jean Muir Ltd
service charges and long leases:contra proferentem rule
1. Gilje v Charlegrove Securities Ltd
service charges and long leases:costs
1. Iperion Investments Corporation v Broadwalk House Residents Ltd
2. Sella House Ltd v Mears
3. Primeridge Ltd v Jean Muir Ltd
service charges and long leases:covenants
1. Hackney LBC v Thompson
2. Mullaney v Maybourne Grange (Croydon) Management Co Ltd
3. Holding and Management Ltd v Property Holding and Investment Trust plc
service charges and long leases:drafting
1. Billson v Tristrem
service charges and long leases:errors
1. Universities Superannuation Scheme Ltd v Marks & Spencer plc
service charges and long leases:expenses:building contracts
1. Capital and Counties Freehold Equity Trust Ltd v BL plc
service charges and long leases:expenses:condition precedent as to recovery of costs of works
1. Northways Flats Management Co (Camden) Ltd v Wimpey Pension Trustees Ltd
service charges and long leases:expiry of leases
1. Blatherwick (Services) Ltd v King
2. Capital and Counties Freehold Equity Trust Ltd v BL plc
service charges and long leases:fair and reasonable approach
1. Pole Properties Ltd v Feinberg
service charges and long leases:heating charges, fair and reasonable approach to
1. Pole Properties Ltd v Feinberg
service charges and long leases:improvements/repairs distinction
1. Mullaney v Maybourne Grange (Croydon) Management Co Ltd
2. Holding and Management Ltd v Property Holding and Investment Trust plc
service charges and long leases:incurred, when costs are
1. Frobisher (Second Investments) Ltd v Kiloran Trust Co Ltd
service charges and long leases:indemnity costs
1. Primeridge Ltd v Jean Muir Ltd
service charges and long leases:intention
1. Billson v Tristrem
service charges and long leases:interest
1. Boldmark Ltd v Cohen
service charges and long leases:maintenance
1. Unchained Growth III plc v Granby Village (Manchester) Management Co Ltd
service charges and long leases:overpayments, need for detailed accounts of
1. St Mary’s Mansions Ltd v Limegate Investment Co Ltd
service charges and long leases:reasonableness
1. Pole Properties Ltd v Feinberg
service charges and long leases:reasonableness:fair and reasonable approach
1. Pole Properties Ltd v Feinberg
service charges and long leases:reasonableness:heating charges
1. Pole Properties Ltd v Feinberg
service charges and long leases:repairs:covenants
1. Mullaney v Maybourne Grange (Croydon) Management Co Ltd
2. Holding and Management Ltd v Property Holding and Investment Trust plc
service charges and long leases:repairs:enforcement of covenants
1. Holding and Management Ltd v Property Holding and Investment Trust plc
service charges and long leases:repairs:improvements/repairs distinction
1. Mullaney v Maybourne Grange (Croydon) Management Co Ltd
2. Holding and Management Ltd v Property Holding and Investment Trust plc
service charges and long leases:restrictive interpretation
1. Gilje v Charlegrove Securities Ltd
service charges and long leases:roofs, new and improved
1. New England Properties plc v Portsmouth News Shops Ltd
service charges and long leases:set-off
1. Unchained Growth III plc v Granby Village (Manchester) Management Co Ltd
service charges and long leases:solicitors to recover arrears from other tenants, costs of
1. Sella House Ltd v Mears
service charges and long leases:statutory provisions
1. Iperion Investments Corporation v Broadwalk House Residents Ltd
service charges and long leases:statutory tenants, lessees becoming
1. Blatherwick (Services) Ltd v King
service charges and long leases:whole, leases to be read as a
1. Billson v Tristrem
service of notice to quit by one joint tenant :validity
1. Leckhampton Dairies Ltd v Artus Whitfield Ltd
services, laundry and cleaning, contractual right to
1. Huwyler v Ruddy
services, withdrawal of:harassment and illegal eviction
1. Housing Act 1988 ss27 and 28
services, withdrawal of:reasonable grounds
1. Housing Act 1988 ss27 and 28
set-off:anti-set-off clauses
1. Cody v Philps
set-off:damages
1. Damages
2. Ahmed v Southwark LBC
3. Berryman v Hounslow LBC
4. Brent LBC v Carmel (sued as Murphy)
5. Calabar Properties Ltd v Stitcher
6. Chiodi v De Marney
7. Davies v Peterson
8. Ezekiel v McDade
9. Irontrain Investments Ltd v Ansari
10. Lavimizadeh v Lambeth LBC
11. Lubren v Lambeth LBC
12. Marshall v Rubypoint Ltd
13. McGreal v Wake
14. Edlington Properties Ltd v Fenner & Co Ltd
15. Filross Securities v Midgeley
16. Maunder Taylor v Blaquiere
17. Muscat v Smith
18. Kaur v Gill
19. Nwokorie v Mason
set-off:disrepair
1. Damages
2. Ahmed v Southwark LBC
3. Berryman v Hounslow LBC
4. Brent LBC v Carmel (sued as Murphy)
5. Calabar Properties Ltd v Stitcher
6. Chiodi v De Marney
7. Davies v Peterson
8. Ezekiel v McDade
9. Irontrain Investments Ltd v Ansari
10. Lavimizadeh v Lambeth LBC
11. Lubren v Lambeth LBC
12. Marshall v Rubypoint Ltd
13. McGreal v Wake
14. Edlington Properties Ltd v Fenner & Co Ltd
15. Filross Securities v Midgeley
16. Maunder Taylor v Blaquiere
17. Muscat v Smith
set-off:harassment and illegal eviction
1. Kalas v Farmer
2. Kaur v Gill
3. Nwokorie v Mason
set-off:mortgage possession proceedings
1. Royal Bank of Scotland v O’Shea
set-off:original landlords
1. Edlington Properties Ltd v Fenner & Co Ltd
set-off:service charges and long leases
1. Unchained Growth III plc v Granby Village (Manchester) Management Co Ltd
set-off:succession
1. Muscat v Smith
set-off:time limits
1. Filross Securities v Midgeley
set-off:unfair contract terms, exclusion clauses and
1. Set-off and counterclaim
2. Cody v Philps
setting aside possession orders
1. Setting aside possession orders
2. Bank of Scotland v Pereira
3. Forcelux Ltd v Binnie
4. Governors of Peabody Donation Fund v Hay
5. Hackney LBC v Findlay
6. Tower Hamlets LBC v Abadie
7. Clapton Community Housing Trust v McGrath
8. Lewisham LBC v Gurbuz
setting aside possession orders:abuse of process
1. Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Hill
setting aside possession orders:adjournments
1. Second WRVS Housing Society v Blair
setting aside possession orders:appeals
1. Setting aside possession orders
setting aside possession orders:attendance at court
1. Setting aside possession orders
setting aside possession orders:Civil Procedure Rules
1. Setting aside possession orders
2. Bank of Scotland v Pereira
3. Forcelux Ltd v Binnie
4. Hackney LBC v Findlay
setting aside possession orders:commencement of possession proceedings
1. Camden LBC v M
setting aside possession orders:county court orders by Supreme Court
1. Manchester CC v Pinnock (No 2)
setting aside possession orders:criteria
1. Bank of Scotland v Pereira
setting aside possession orders:delay
1. Tower Hamlets LBC v Abadie
setting aside possession orders:evidence
1. Lewisham LBC v Gurbuz
setting aside possession orders:execution of orders ceasing to have effect
1. Governors of Peabody Donation Fund v Hay
setting aside possession orders:fraud
1. Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Hill
setting aside possession orders:good faith
1. Lewisham LBC v Gurbuz
setting aside possession orders:harassment and illegal eviction
1. Botu v Brent LBC
setting aside possession orders:initial possession hearings as not being a trial
1. Forcelux Ltd v Binnie
setting aside possession orders:mental capacity of tenants
1. Camden LBC v M
setting aside possession orders:nuisance and annoyance
1. Sheffield CC v Fletcher
setting aside possession orders:oppression
1. Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Hill
setting aside possession orders:prejudice, delay where council would not be
1. Tower Hamlets LBC v Abadie
setting aside possession orders:rent arrears
1. Brent LBC v Marks
2. Second WRVS Housing Society v Blair
setting aside possession orders:social security benefits position, ascertaining the
1. Second WRVS Housing Society v Blair
setting aside possession orders:summons sent to tenants, no evidence that
1. Patel v Smeaton
setting aside possession orders:warrants 1.2
1. Hackney LBC v White
2. Setting aside warrants after execution
3. Camden LBC v Akanni
4. Hackney LBC v White
5. Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Hill
6. Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Lemeh
7. Islington LBC v Harridge
8. Jephson Homes HA v Moisejevs
9. Lambeth LBC v Hughes
10. Saint v Barking and Dagenham LBC
11. Southwark LBC v Sarfo
12. Southwark LBC v St Brice
13. Tower Hamlets LBC v Azad
14. Rendham Holdings Ltd v Patel
setting aside possession orders:wrong time of hearings, where tenants told
1. Clapton Community Housing Trust v McGrath
setting aside warrants after execution
1. Hackney LBC v White
2. Setting aside warrants after execution
3. Camden LBC v Akanni
4. Hackney LBC v White
5. Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Hill
6. Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Lemeh
7. Islington LBC v Harridge
8. Jephson Homes HA v Moisejevs
9. Lambeth LBC v Hughes
10. Saint v Barking and Dagenham LBC
11. Southwark LBC v Sarfo
12. Southwark LBC v St Brice
13. Tower Hamlets LBC v Azad
14. Rendham Holdings Ltd v Patel
setting aside warrants after execution:abuse of process
1. Hackney LBC v White
2. Setting aside warrants after execution
3. Camden LBC v Akanni
4. Hackney LBC v White
5. Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Hill
6. Jephson Homes HA v Moisejevs
setting aside warrants after execution:actions of court, oppression resulting from
1. Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Lemeh
setting aside warrants after execution:administrative acts without hearings, issue of warrants as
1. Southwark LBC v St Brice
setting aside warrants after execution:assured tenancies
1. Setting aside warrants after execution
setting aside warrants after execution:defective warrants
1. Tower Hamlets LBC v Azad
setting aside warrants after execution:delay
1. Southwark LBC v Sarfo
setting aside warrants after execution:discrimination
1. Southwark LBC v St Brice
setting aside warrants after execution:errors in applications for warrants
1. Tower Hamlets LBC v Azad
setting aside warrants after execution:fair hearing, right to a
1. Southwark LBC v St Brice
setting aside warrants after execution:fault
1. Jephson Homes HA v Moisejevs
setting aside warrants after execution:fraud
1. Setting aside warrants after execution
2. Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Hill
setting aside warrants after execution:full payment of arrears, insistence of
1. Lambeth LBC v Hughes
setting aside warrants after execution:housing benefit
1. Saint v Barking and Dagenham LBC
2. Rendham Holdings Ltd v Patel
setting aside warrants after execution:notice of eviction
1. Jephson Homes HA v Moisejevs
setting aside warrants after execution:oppression
1. Setting aside warrants after execution
2. Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Hill
3. Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Lemeh
4. Jephson Homes HA v Moisejevs
5. Lambeth LBC v Hughes
6. Southwark LBC v Sarfo
7. Rendham Holdings Ltd v Patel
setting aside warrants after execution:payment of rent arrears
1. Lambeth LBC v Hughes
2. Saint v Barking and Dagenham LBC
setting aside warrants after execution:prison, where council know tenants are in
1. Saint v Barking and Dagenham LBC
setting aside warrants after execution:private and family life, right to respect for
1. Southwark LBC v St Brice
setting aside warrants after execution:Rent Act tenancies
1. Setting aside warrants after execution
setting aside warrants after execution:rent arrears
1. Setting aside warrants after execution
2. Lambeth LBC v Hughes
3. Saint v Barking and Dagenham LBC
4. Rendham Holdings Ltd v Patel
setting aside warrants after execution:secure tenancies
1. Setting aside warrants after execution
setting aside warrants after execution:stale judgments
1. Hackney LBC v White
2. Hackney LBC v White
setting aside warrants after execution:stay of execution, failure to consider applications for
1. Rendham Holdings Ltd v Patel
setting aside warrants after execution:suspension of warrants where application not heard prior to hearings
1. Islington LBC v Harridge
setting aside warrants after execution:wrong amount, applications for warrants stating
1. Saint v Barking and Dagenham LBC
settled accommodation and homelessness:abroad, unlawful occupied property
1. R v Croydon LBC ex p Easom
settled accommodation and homelessness:affordability
1. Mohamed v Westminster CC
settled accommodation and homelessness:anti-social behaviour
1. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p P
settled accommodation and homelessness:assured shorthold tenancies
1. Knight v Vale Royal BC
settled accommodation and homelessness:before start of tenancies, deliberate acts
1. Minchin v Sheffield CC
settled accommodation and homelessness:caravans on unauthorised sites
1. Steward v Kingston upon Thames RLBC
settled accommodation and homelessness:causation
1. Causation and settled accommodation
2. Bratton v Croydon LBC
3. Denton v Southwark LBC
4. Dyson v Kerrier DC
5. Knight v Vale Royal BC
6. Minchin v Sheffield CC
7. Mohamed v Westminster CC
8. R v Gloucester CC ex p Miles
9. Steward v Kingston upon Thames RLBC
10. Stewart v Lambeth LBC
11. Watchman v Ipswich BC
12. R v Basingstoke and Deane BC ex p Bassett
13. R v Croydon LBC ex p Easom
14. R v Hackney LBC ex p Ajayi
15. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p P
16. R v Hounslow LBC ex p R
17. R v Merton LBC ex p Ruffle
18. R v Newham LBC ex p Campbell
19. R v Shrewsbury and Atcham BC ex p Griffiths
20. R v Westminster CC ex p Reid
21. R v Kyle and Carrick DC ex p Robson
settled accommodation and homelessness:chain of causation, breaking the
1. R v Hackney LBC ex p Ajayi
settled accommodation and homelessness:conduct of children towards parents
1. Denton v Southwark LBC
settled accommodation and homelessness:death threats from IRA
1. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p P
settled accommodation and homelessness:employment, loss of
1. Watchman v Ipswich BC
settled accommodation and homelessness:fact and degree, questions of
1. Knight v Vale Royal BC
settled accommodation and homelessness:harassment
1. R v Newham LBC ex p Campbell
settled accommodation and homelessness:imprisonment
1. Stewart v Lambeth LBC
settled accommodation and homelessness:income support
1. R v Shrewsbury and Atcham BC ex p Griffiths
settled accommodation and homelessness:intention, relevance of
1. R v Kyle and Carrick DC ex p Robson
settled accommodation and homelessness:intentional homelessness
1. Intentional homelessness
2. Din v Wandsworth LBC
3. R v Brent LBC ex p Awua
4. Causation and settled accommodation
5. Bratton v Croydon LBC
6. Denton v Southwark LBC
7. Dyson v Kerrier DC
8. Knight v Vale Royal BC
9. Minchin v Sheffield CC
10. Mohamed v Westminster CC
11. R v Gloucester CC ex p Miles
12. Steward v Kingston upon Thames RLBC
13. Stewart v Lambeth LBC
14. Watchman v Ipswich BC
15. R v Basingstoke and Deane BC ex p Bassett
16. R v Croydon LBC ex p Easom
17. R v Hackney LBC ex p Ajayi
18. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p P
19. R v Hounslow LBC ex p R
20. R v Merton LBC ex p Ruffle
21. R v Newham LBC ex p Campbell
22. R v Shrewsbury and Atcham BC ex p Griffiths
23. R v Westminster CC ex p Reid
24. R v Kyle and Carrick DC ex p Robson
settled accommodation and homelessness:last period of settled accommodation
1. Din v Wandsworth LBC
settled accommodation and homelessness:main housing duty
1. R v Brent LBC ex p Awua
settled accommodation and homelessness:marriage, breakdown of
1. R v Basingstoke and Deane BC ex p Bassett
settled accommodation and homelessness:mortgages
1. Watchman v Ipswich BC
2. R v Shrewsbury and Atcham BC ex p Griffiths
settled accommodation and homelessness:obiter dicta comments
1. R v Wandsworth LBC ex p Wingrove and Mansoor
settled accommodation and homelessness:overcrowding
1. Mohamed v Westminster CC
settled accommodation and homelessness:pregnancy
1. R v Hackney LBC ex p Ajayi
settled accommodation and homelessness:reason for loss of most recent accommodation, consideration of
1. Dyson v Kerrier DC
settled accommodation and homelessness:reasonableness
1. R v Hounslow LBC ex p R
2. R v Westminster CC ex p Reid
settled accommodation and homelessness:rent arrears, cause of
1. Bratton v Croydon LBC
settled accommodation and homelessness:Scotland
1. R v Kyle and Carrick DC ex p Robson
settled accommodation and homelessness:slapping children
1. R v Westminster CC ex p Reid
settled accommodation and homelessness:temporary or settled, property as being either
1. R v Merton LBC ex p Ruffle
settled accommodation and homelessness:test
1. R v Hounslow LBC ex p R
settled accommodation and homelessness:vandalism
1. R v Gloucester CC ex p Miles
settled accommodation and homelessness:violence
1. R v Newham LBC ex p Campbell
settlements :consent orders
1. R v Birmingham CC ex p Foley
settlements :disrepair
1. Chin v Hackney LBC
settlements :Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under
1. Middlemast v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC
settlements :mortgage possession proceedings
1. Bradford and Bingley plc v Rashid
settlements :res judicata
1. Chin v Hackney LBC
settlements :time limits extended by offers of settlement
1. Bradford and Bingley plc v Rashid
settlements :without prejudice correspondence
1. Bradford and Bingley plc v Rashid
sexual orientation :discrimination
1. Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza
sexual orientation :family members, as
1. Fitzpatrick v Sterling Housing Association
sexual orientation :private and family life and home, right to respect for
1. Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza
sexual orientation :same sex partners
1. Succession to assured tenancies
2. Southern Housing Group Ltd v Nutting
3. Fitzpatrick v Sterling Housing Association
4. Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza
sexual orientation :succession
1. Fitzpatrick v Sterling Housing Association
2. Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza
shams:assured shorthold tenancies
1. Bhopal v Walia
shams:company lets
1. Eaton Square Properties Ltd v O’Higgins
2. Estavest Investments Ltd v Commercial Express Travel Ltd
3. Hilton v Plustitle Ltd
4. Kaye v Massbetter Ltd and Kanter
5. Navinter SA v Pastoll
shams:directors or shareholders, where occupiers are neither
1. Navinter SA v Pastoll
shams:employees
1. Godsmark v Greenwich LBC
shams:extreme, terms of licence as being
1. Crancour Ltd v Da Silvaesa
shams:higher rent, written agreements for
1. Bhopal v Walia
shams:holiday lets
1. Buchmann v May
shams:intention for company to be tenant
1. Kaye v Massbetter Ltd and Kanter
shams:leave room for 90 mins a day, requirement to
1. Aslan v Murphy (No 1)
shams:licence/tenancy distinction
1. Aslan v Murphy (No 1)
2. Crancour Ltd v Da Silvaesa
shams:rent, where company pays the
1. Estavest Investments Ltd v Commercial Express Travel Ltd
shams:set up company, where tenant is required to
1. Hilton v Plustitle Ltd
shams:tax advantages
1. Eaton Square Properties Ltd v O’Higgins
shopping centres
1. Manchester CC v Lawler
shops, protection of tenants above
1. Wellcome Trust v Hamad
single men with health problems, inadequate enquiries about
1. Benson v Lewisham LBC
slapping children
1. R v Westminster CC ex p Reid
sleep:resident landlord does not sleep on premises
1. Palmer v McNamara
sleep:rough sleeping
1. Ogle v Bundhoo
sleep:use of flats only for sleep
1. Hampstead Way Investments Ltd v Lewis-Weare
social factors consideration of
1. Polonski v Lloyds Bank Mortgages Ltd
2. R v Newham LBC ex p Ajayi
3. R v Lewisham LBC ex p Dolan
social security benefits:abroad, accommodation situated
1. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Duro-Rama
social security benefits:ascertain social security position, setting aside orders to
1. Second WRVS Housing Society v Blair
social security benefits:direct payments, possibility of
1. Second WRVS Housing Society v Blair
social security benefits:disability living allowance
1. Ali v Camden LBC
social security benefits:income support
1. R v Shrewsbury and Atcham BC ex p Griffiths
social security benefits:rent arrears
1. Second WRVS Housing Society v Blair
social workers, statements of
1. R v Nottingham CC ex p Costello
solicitors, problems with finding
1. Barrett v Southwark LBC
sound insulation
1. Southwark LBC v Mills; Southwark LBC v Tanner; Baxter v Camden LBC
2. R (Vella) v Lambeth LBC and London and Quadrant Housing Trust
specification of works
1. East Staffordshire BC v Fairless
spouses and partners :acquiescence, intentional homelessness and
1. R v North Devon DC ex p Lewis
2. R v Swansea CC ex p John
spouses and partners :assets on termination of tenancies
1. Newlon Housing Trust v Al-Sulaimen
spouses and partners :cohabitees, succession of
1. Succession to assured tenancies
spouses and partners :continued occupation, reasonableness of
1. Hemans v Windsor and Maidenhead RBC
spouses and partners :ex-partners, being expected to reside with
1. R v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p Moncada
spouses and partners :excluded spouses, breaches by
1. Barnet LBC v Hurley
spouses and partners :homelessness:repeat applications
1. R (Griffin) v Southwark LBC
spouses and partners :homelessness:settled accommodation
1. R v Basingstoke and Deane BC ex p Bassett
spouses and partners :leave, not asking partners to
1. R v Swansea CC ex p John
spouses and partners :matrimonial homes
1. Hall v King
2. Church Commissioners for England v Al-Emarah
spouses and partners :nuisance caused by partners
1. R v Swansea CC ex p John
spouses and partners :reasonable to believe spouses would accommodate partners
1. R v Barking and Dagenham LBC ex p Okuneye
spouses and partners :refusal of parents to allow partners to live with applicants
1. R v Peterborough CC ex p Carr
spouses and partners :same sex partners
1. Succession to assured tenancies
2. Southern Housing Group Ltd v Nutting
3. Fitzpatrick v Sterling Housing Association
4. Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza
spouses and partners :settled accommodation and intentional homelessness
1. R v Basingstoke and Deane BC ex p Bassett
spouses and partners :succession
1. Succession to assured tenancies
spouses and partners :suspension of warrants before execution
1. Barnet LBC v Hurley
spouses and partners :transfers
1. Church Commissioners for England v Al-Emarah
spouses and partners :visits to partners not amounting to occupation
1. Ibie v Trubshaw
squatters
1. Swordheath Properties Ltd v Floydd
stairs:collapse
1. Sheriden v Broadbridge
standing :agents
1. Chesters Accommodation Agency Ltd v Abebrese
standing :commencement of possession proceedings
1. Alamo Housing Co-operative Ltd v Meredith
2. Chesters Accommodation Agency Ltd v Abebrese
standing :mortgage possession proceedings
1. Nationwide Building Society v Purvis
standing :service of notice to quit
1. Alamo Housing Co-operative Ltd v Meredith
standing :sufficient interest
1. Countryside Residential (North Thames) Ltd v Tugwell
2. Alamo Housing Co-operative Ltd v Meredith
standing :trespassers
1. Countryside Residential (North Thames) Ltd v Tugwell
statements of truth, no rubber stamping of
1. Birmingham CC v Hosey
stay of possession proceedings
1. Moat Housing Group South Ltd v Harris and Hartless
step children, succession of
1. Sheffield CC v Wall (No 2)
steps:garden steps, defects in
1. McAuley v Bristol CC
steps:moss
1. Brunskill v Mulcahy
steps:staircases
1. Sheriden v Broadbridge
steps:steepness
1. Hanley v Tameside MBC
striking out
1. Kelsey Housing Association v King
2. Law Land v Sinclair
3. Barclays Bank plc v Brooks
structure:block of flats
1. Adami v Lincoln Grange Management Ltd
structure:condensation
1. Quick v Taff-Ely BC
structure:floor joists
1. Fincar SRL v 109/113 Mount Street Management Co Ltd
structure:outside walls
1. Campden Hill Towers Ltd v Gardner
structure:ownership of landlords, not limited to items in
1. Marlborough Park Services Ltd v Rowe and another
structure:physical damage
1. Southwark LBC v McIntosh
structure:plaster
1. Hussein v Mehlman
2. Grand v Gill
structure:roof terraces of flats
1. Ibrahim v Dovecorn Reversions Ltd
structure:roofs
1. Douglas-Scott v Scorgie
2. Ibrahim v Dovecorn Reversions Ltd
structure:subsidence
1. Smedley v Chumley and Hawkes Ltd
structure:surfaces
1. Hallisey v Petmoor Developments Ltd
2. Ibrahim v Dovecorn Reversions Ltd
structure:walls
1. Smedley v Chumley and Hawkes Ltd
2. Campden Hill Towers Ltd v Gardner
3. Fincar SRL v 109/113 Mount Street Management Co Ltd
4. Hallisey v Petmoor Developments Ltd
students whilst studying, disturbance of
1. Speiro Lechouritis v Goldmile Properties Ltd
subcontractors, negligence by
1. D & F Estates Ltd v Church Commissioners
subletting whole of premises as ground for possession
1. Subletting the whole of premises
2. Leith Properties Ltd v Springer
3. Pazgate Ltd v McGrath
4. RC Glaze Properties Ltd v Alabdinboni
subletting whole of premises as ground for possession:assignment, consent to
1. Pazgate Ltd v McGrath
subletting whole of premises as ground for possession:assured tenancies
1. Subletting the whole of premises
subletting whole of premises as ground for possession:consent
1. Subletting the whole of premises
2. Leith Properties Ltd v Springer
3. Pazgate Ltd v McGrath
subletting whole of premises as ground for possession:discretionary grounds
1. Subletting the whole of premises
subletting whole of premises as ground for possession:notice to quit
1. Subletting the whole of premises
subletting whole of premises as ground for possession:Rent Act tenancies
1. Subletting the whole of premises
subletting whole of premises as ground for possession:rent books containing prohibition
1. RC Glaze Properties Ltd v Alabdinboni
subletting whole of premises as ground for possession:secure tenancies
1. Subletting the whole of premises
subsidence
1. Smedley v Chumley and Hawkes Ltd
subtenancies
1. Islington LBC v Green
2. Keepers and Governors of the Free Grammar School of John Lyon v James
3. Monmouth BC v Marlog
4. Shepherd’s Bush Housing Association v HATS Co-operative of Hammersmith Ltd
5. Wellcome Trust v Hamad
6. Camden LBC v Shortlife Community Housing Ltd and Others
subtenancies:breach of covenant
1. Roundlistic Limited v Jones
subtenancies:burden of proof
1. Waltham Forest CBHA v Fanning
subtenancies:commencement of possession proceedings
1. Alamo Housing Co-operative Ltd v Meredith
subtenancies:forfeiture
1. Keepers and Governors of the Free Grammar School of John Lyon v James
2. Ashton v Sobelman
subtenancies:form intention to return, where tenant could not
1. McLoughlin’s Curator Bonis v Motherwell DC
subtenancies:grounds for possession
1. Subletting the whole of premises
2. Leith Properties Ltd v Springer
3. Pazgate Ltd v McGrath
4. RC Glaze Properties Ltd v Alabdinboni
subtenancies:head leases, staying on after termination of
1. Vaughan-Armatrading v Sarsah
subtenancies:Housing Act 1985
1. Occupation as only or principal home: Housing Act 1985 s81 and Housing Act 1988 s1(1)(b); Prohibition against subletting: Housing Act 1985 s93 and Housing Act 1988 s15A
2. Brent LBC v Cronin
3. Crawley BC v Sawyer
4. Gay v Sheeran
5. Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Clarke
6. Hussey v Camden LBC
7. Jennings v Epping Forest DC
8. Lambeth LBC v Vandra
9. Merton LBC v Salama
10. Muir Group Housing Association Ltd v Thornley
11. Sutton LBC v Swann
12. Ujima Housing Association v Ansah
13. Amoah v Barking and Dagenham LBC
14. Waltham Forest CBHA v Fanning
15. Notting Hill Housing Trust v Etoria
16. McLoughlin’s Curator Bonis v Motherwell DC
subtenancies:Housing Act 1988
1. Occupation as only or principal home: Housing Act 1985 s81 and Housing Act 1988 s1(1)(b); Prohibition against subletting: Housing Act 1985 s93 and Housing Act 1988 s15A
2. Brent LBC v Cronin
3. Crawley BC v Sawyer
4. Gay v Sheeran
5. Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Clarke
6. Hussey v Camden LBC
7. Jennings v Epping Forest DC
8. Lambeth LBC v Vandra
9. Merton LBC v Salama
10. Muir Group Housing Association Ltd v Thornley
11. Sutton LBC v Swann
12. Ujima Housing Association v Ansah
13. Amoah v Barking and Dagenham LBC
14. Waltham Forest CBHA v Fanning
15. Notting Hill Housing Trust v Etoria
16. McLoughlin’s Curator Bonis v Motherwell DC
subtenancies:ill tenants
2. McLoughlin’s Curator Bonis v Motherwell DC
subtenancies:intention:burden of proof
1. Waltham Forest CBHA v Fanning
subtenancies:intention:enduring intention
1. Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Clarke
subtenancies:intention:form intention to return, where tenant could not
1. McLoughlin’s Curator Bonis v Motherwell DC
subtenancies:joint tenancies
1. Gay v Sheeran
subtenancies:licences:housing associations, grant to
1. Islington LBC v Green
subtenancies:licences:licence/tenancy distinction
1. Vaughan-Armatrading v Sarsah
subtenancies:licences:possession, local authorities entitlement to
1. Camden LBC v Shortlife Community Housing Ltd and Others
subtenancies:licences:sharing council flats with tenants
1. Monmouth BC v Marlog
subtenancies:life prisoners, real possibility of return of
1. Notting Hill Housing Trust v Etoria
subtenancies:mesne profits
1. Braintree DC v Vincent
subtenancies:mortgage possession proceedings
1. Citibank International plc v Kessler
subtenancies:notice seeking possession
1. Braintree DC v Vincent
subtenancies:notice to quit
1. Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Clarke
2. Pennell v Payne
subtenancies:nuisance and annoyance
1. Anti-social behaviour
subtenancies:objective intention
1. Ujima Housing Association v Ansah
subtenancies:occupation as a residence
1. Moreland Properties (UK) Ltd v Dhokia
subtenancies:only or principal home requirement
1. Occupation as only or principal home: Housing Act 1985 s81 and Housing Act 1988 s1(1)(b); Prohibition against subletting: Housing Act 1985 s93 and Housing Act 1988 s15A
2. Brent LBC v Cronin
3. Crawley BC v Sawyer
4. Gay v Sheeran
5. Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Clarke
6. Hussey v Camden LBC
7. Jennings v Epping Forest DC
8. Lambeth LBC v Vandra
9. Merton LBC v Salama
10. Muir Group Housing Association Ltd v Thornley
11. Sutton LBC v Swann
12. Ujima Housing Association v Ansah
13. Amoah v Barking and Dagenham LBC
14. Waltham Forest CBHA v Fanning
15. Notting Hill Housing Trust v Etoria
16. McLoughlin’s Curator Bonis v Motherwell DC
subtenancies:part of premises
1. Merton LBC v Salama
subtenancies:physical signs of continued occupation
1. Crawley BC v Sawyer
subtenancies:possession orders/claims
1. Camden LBC v Shortlife Community Housing Ltd and Others
subtenancies:prisoners:life prisoners, real possibility of return of
1. Notting Hill Housing Trust v Etoria
subtenancies:prisoners:long sentences, serving
1. Amoah v Barking and Dagenham LBC
subtenancies:private sector
1. Private sector leasing (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 6)
2. Haringey LBC v Hickey
3. Tower Hamlets LBC v Abdi
4. Tower Hamlets LBC v Miah
5. Westminster CC v Boraliu
subtenancies:Rent Act tenants above shops
1. Wellcome Trust v Hamad
subtenancies:residence requirement
1. Crawley BC v Sawyer
2. Gay v Sheeran
3. Notting Hill Housing Trust v Etoria
subtenancies:resumption of occupation after loss of secure tenancies
1. Hussey v Camden LBC
subtenancies:return after temporary absences, to
1. Crawley BC v Sawyer
subtenancies:right to buy
1. Jennings v Epping Forest DC
2. Muir Group Housing Association Ltd v Thornley
3. Sutton LBC v Swann
subtenancies:Scotland
1. McLoughlin’s Curator Bonis v Motherwell DC
subtenancies:secure tenancies
1. Hussey v Camden LBC
2. Jennings v Epping Forest DC
3. Muir Group Housing Association Ltd v Thornley
4. Sutton LBC v Swann
5. McLoughlin’s Curator Bonis v Motherwell DC
subtenancies:security of tenure
1. Occupation as only or principal home: Housing Act 1985 s81 and Housing Act 1988 s1(1)(b); Prohibition against subletting: Housing Act 1985 s93 and Housing Act 1988 s15A
2. Brent LBC v Cronin
3. Crawley BC v Sawyer
4. Gay v Sheeran
5. Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Clarke
6. Hussey v Camden LBC
7. Jennings v Epping Forest DC
8. Lambeth LBC v Vandra
9. Merton LBC v Salama
10. Muir Group Housing Association Ltd v Thornley
11. Sutton LBC v Swann
12. Ujima Housing Association v Ansah
13. Amoah v Barking and Dagenham LBC
14. Waltham Forest CBHA v Fanning
15. Notting Hill Housing Trust v Etoria
16. McLoughlin’s Curator Bonis v Motherwell DC
subtenancies:service of notice to quit
1. Alamo Housing Co-operative Ltd v Meredith
subtenancies:sharing council flats with tenants
1. Monmouth BC v Marlog
subtenancies:shops, protection of tenants above
1. Wellcome Trust v Hamad
subtenancies:staying on after termination of head leases
1. Vaughan-Armatrading v Sarsah
subtenancies:sufficient interest to evict
1. Alamo Housing Co-operative Ltd v Meredith
subtenancies:surrender
1. Basingstoke and Deane BC v Paice
subtenancies:temporary absences
1. Brent LBC v Cronin
2. Crawley BC v Sawyer
subtenancies:temporary occupancy by others
1. Hussey v Camden LBC
subtenancies:tenant condition
1. Occupation as only or principal home: Housing Act 1985 s81 and Housing Act 1988 s1(1)(b); Prohibition against subletting: Housing Act 1985 s93 and Housing Act 1988 s15A
subtenancies:termination of head leases, ending of interests with
1. Shepherd’s Bush Housing Association v HATS Co-operative of Hammersmith Ltd
subtenancies:transfer of tenancies
1. Gay v Sheeran
subtenancies:whole of flats
1. Merton LBC v Salama
succession:2-year relationships
1. Chios Investment Property Co v Lopez
succession:12 months residence
1. Waltham Forest LBC v Thomas
2. Westminster CC v Peart
succession
1. Succession to secure tenancies
2. Austin v Southwark LBC
3. Birmingham CC v Walker
4. Waltham Forest LBC v Thomas
5. Bassetlaw DC v Renshaw
6. Brent LBC v Fofana
7. Epping Forest DC v Pomphrett
8. Islington LBC v Freeman
9. Marsh v Lewisham LBC
10. Michalak v Wandsworth LBC
11. Newham LBC v Phillips
12. Newham LBC v Ria
13. Peabody Donation Fund Governors v Grant
14. Sheffield CC v Wall
15. Sheffield CC v Wall (No 2)
16. Westminster CC v Peart
17. Sharp v Brent LBC
succession:assignment after surrender by siblings
1. Clore v MacNicol
succession:assurances
1. Daejan Properties Ltd v Mahoney
succession:assured tenancies
1. Succession to assured tenancies
2. Southern Housing Group Ltd v Nutting
succession:burden of proof
1. Peabody Donation Fund Governors v Grant
succession:carers
1. Hildebrand v Moon
succession:children:carers
1. Hildebrand v Moon
succession:children:de facto
1. Brock v Wollams
2. Sefton Holdings Ltd v Cairns
succession:children:foster children
1. Sheffield CC v Wall
succession:children:part time with parents, children living
1. Swanbrae Ltd v Elliott
succession:children:Rent Act tenancies
1. Portman Registrars v Mohammed Latif
succession:children:secure tenancies
1. Sheffield CC v Wall
2. Sheffield CC v Wall (No 2)
succession:civil partners
1. Succession to assured tenancies
succession:close relationships between strangers
1. Carega Properties SA v Sharratt
succession:cohabitees
1. Succession to assured tenancies
succession:common law succession, suspension of
1. Newham LBC v Ria
succession:conditions, proof of
1. Peabody Donation Fund Governors v Grant
succession:de facto children
1. Brock v Wollams
2. Sefton Holdings Ltd v Cairns
succession:death of tenants
1. Death of tenant
2. Wandsworth LBC v Randall
succession:different accommodation, offers of
1. Sharp v Brent LBC
succession:discrimination
1. Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza
succession:duration of relationships
1. Chios Investment Property Co v Lopez
succession:duration of residence
1. Waltham Forest LBC v Thomas
2. Westminster CC v Peart
succession:estoppel where assurances given
1. Daejan Properties Ltd v Mahoney
succession:evidence
1. Marsh v Lewisham LBC
succession:family members
1. Carega Properties SA v Sharratt
2. Fitzpatrick v Sterling Housing Association
3. Brock v Wollams
4. Sefton Holdings Ltd v Cairns
succession:foster children
1. Sheffield CC v Wall
succession:garden until becoming a tenant, successors not liable for deterioration of
1. Holloway v Povey
succession:homelessness duty, acceptance of
1. Sharp v Brent LBC
succession:hospital, temporary absences in
1. Hedgedale Ltd v Hards
succession:Housing Act 1980, survivorship before
1. Birmingham CC v Walker
succession:illegitimate children
1. Sheffield CC v Wall (No 2)
succession:intention
1. Hildebrand v Moon
succession:joint succession
1. Newham LBC v Phillips
succession:joint tenants
1. Bassetlaw DC v Renshaw
2. Fitzpatrick v Sterling Housing Association
succession:letters to deceased spouses interpreted as new tenancies
1. Epping Forest DC v Pomphrett
succession:member of another’s family, definition of
1. Succession to secure tenancies
succession:member of family, definition of
1. Brent LBC v Fofana
2. Michalak v Wandsworth LBC
succession:nurse parents, children moving in to
1. Hildebrand v Moon
succession:part time with parents, children living
1. Swanbrae Ltd v Elliott
succession:physical presence as residing with, mere
1. Islington LBC v Freeman
succession:possession orders
1. Austin v Southwark LBC
succession:postponement of date of possession due to death
1. Austin v Southwark LBC
succession:private and family life and home, right to respect for
1. Michalak v Wandsworth LBC
2. Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza
3. Sharp v Brent LBC
succession:Rent Act tenancies
1. Succession to Rent Act tenancies
2. Carega Properties SA v Sharratt
3. Fitzpatrick v Sterling Housing Association
4. Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza
5. Brock v Wollams
6. Chios Investment Property Co v Lopez
7. Clore v MacNicol
8. Daejan Properties Ltd v Mahoney
9. Hedgedale Ltd v Hards
10. Hildebrand v Moon
11. Sefton Holdings Ltd v Cairns
12. Swanbrae Ltd v Elliott
13. Tennant v Hutton
14. Portman Registrars v Mohammed Latif
succession:rent regulation
1. N & D (London) Ltd v Gadson
succession:residence requirement
1. Islington LBC v Freeman
2. Sheffield CC v Wall
3. Hedgedale Ltd v Hards
succession:same sex partners
1. Succession to assured tenancies
2. Southern Housing Group Ltd v Nutting
3. Fitzpatrick v Sterling Housing Association
4. Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza
succession:secure tenancies
1. Succession to secure tenancies
2. Austin v Southwark LBC
3. Birmingham CC v Walker
4. Waltham Forest LBC v Thomas
5. Bassetlaw DC v Renshaw
6. Brent LBC v Fofana
7. Epping Forest DC v Pomphrett
8. Islington LBC v Freeman
9. Marsh v Lewisham LBC
10. Michalak v Wandsworth LBC
11. Newham LBC v Phillips
12. Newham LBC v Ria
13. Peabody Donation Fund Governors v Grant
14. Sheffield CC v Wall
15. Sheffield CC v Wall (No 2)
16. Westminster CC v Peart
17. Sharp v Brent LBC
succession:security of tenure
1. Succession to secure tenancies
2. Austin v Southwark LBC
3. Birmingham CC v Walker
4. Waltham Forest LBC v Thomas
5. Bassetlaw DC v Renshaw
6. Brent LBC v Fofana
7. Epping Forest DC v Pomphrett
8. Islington LBC v Freeman
9. Marsh v Lewisham LBC
10. Michalak v Wandsworth LBC
11. Newham LBC v Phillips
12. Newham LBC v Ria
13. Peabody Donation Fund Governors v Grant
14. Sheffield CC v Wall
15. Sheffield CC v Wall (No 2)
16. Westminster CC v Peart
17. Succession to assured tenancies
18. Southern Housing Group Ltd v Nutting
19. Succession to Rent Act tenancies
20. Carega Properties SA v Sharratt
21. Fitzpatrick v Sterling Housing Association
22. Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza
23. Brock v Wollams
24. Chios Investment Property Co v Lopez
25. Clore v MacNicol
26. Daejan Properties Ltd v Mahoney
27. Hedgedale Ltd v Hards
28. Hildebrand v Moon
29. Sefton Holdings Ltd v Cairns
30. Swanbrae Ltd v Elliott
31. Tennant v Hutton
32. Portman Registrars v Mohammed Latif
33. Sharp v Brent LBC
succession:spouses
1. Succession to assured tenancies
succession:step children
1. Sheffield CC v Wall (No 2)
succession:strangers
1. Carega Properties SA v Sharratt
succession:surrender
1. Clore v MacNicol
succession:survivorship
1. Birmingham CC v Walker
2. Tennant v Hutton
succession:temporary absences
1. Sheffield CC v Wall
2. Hedgedale Ltd v Hards
succession:transfers by deceased
1. Waltham Forest LBC v Thomas
suitability as tenants
1. R (Chowdhury) v Newham LBC
2. General
suitability of accommodation and homelessness:adaptions, assurances that work would be done on
1. Boreh v Ealing LBC
suitability of accommodation and homelessness:affordability
1. Suitability and out of area placements
suitability of accommodation and homelessness:babies, women with
1. R v Newham LBC ex p Dada
suitability of accommodation and homelessness:bed and breakfast
1. Suitability and out of area placements
2. Codona v Mid-Bedfordshire DC
3. R v Newham LBC ex p Ojuri (No 3)
suitability of accommodation and homelessness:continuing duty, as
1. R (Zaher) v Westminster CC
suitability of accommodation and homelessness:damages
1. R v Ealing LBC ex p Parkinson
2. R (Morris) v Newham LBC
suitability of accommodation and homelessness:date of refusal, facts on
1. Sahardid v Camden LBC
2. Osseily v Westminster CC
suitability of accommodation and homelessness:deferral of duty
1. R v Newham LBC ex p Begum (Mashuda)
suitability of accommodation and homelessness:discharge of duty
1. Suitability and out of area placements
suitability of accommodation and homelessness:enquiries
1. R v Sedgemoor DC ex p McCarthy
suitability of accommodation and homelessness:exceptional circumstances
1. R (W) v Sheffield CC
suitability of accommodation and homelessness:family, proximity to
1. Suitability and out of area placements
2. R (Yumsak) v Enfield LBC
suitability of accommodation and homelessness:Gypsies and Travellers
1. Codona v Mid-Bedfordshire DC
2. Lee v Rhondda Cynon Taf CBC
3. R (Maughan) v Leicester CC
4. R (Price) v Carmarthenshire CC
suitability of accommodation and homelessness:housing benefit shortfall
1. R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Kaur
suitability of accommodation and homelessness:injunctions
1. R (Khan) v Newham LBC
suitability of accommodation and homelessness:interim accommodation
1. R (Flash) v Southwark LBC
suitability of accommodation and homelessness:Kurdish/Turkish community when applicant in fear of community,:perverse placement in
1. R v Haringey LBC ex p Karaman
suitability of accommodation and homelessness:long term but suitable for short term, accommodation not reasonable for
1. Birmingham CC v Ali and Aweys; Moran v Manchester CC
suitability of accommodation and homelessness:medical factors
1. R v Lewisham LBC ex p Dolan
suitability of accommodation and homelessness:one-bedroom flats for grandmother and grandson
1. R (Flash) v Southwark LBC
suitability of accommodation and homelessness:out of area placements
1. Suitability and out of area placements
2. R (Yumsak) v Enfield LBC
3. R (W) v Sheffield CC
suitability of accommodation and homelessness:personal circumstances
1. R v Brent LBC ex p Omar
2. R v Newham LBC ex p Ojuri (No 3)
suitability of accommodation and homelessness:pregnant women
1. Suitability and out of area placements
2. R v Newham LBC ex p Dada
suitability of accommodation and homelessness:private and family life and home, right to respect for
1. R (Morris) v Newham LBC
2. R (Price) v Carmarthenshire CC
3. R (Yumsak) v Enfield LBC
suitability of accommodation and homelessness:reasons for decisions
1. Akhtar v Birmingham CC
suitability of accommodation and homelessness:refusal of offers:homelessness reviews
1. Sahardid v Camden LBC
2. Osseily v Westminster CC
suitability of accommodation and homelessness:refusal of offers:reasonableness
1. Sahardid v Camden LBC
2. Osseily v Westminster CC
suitability of accommodation and homelessness:reviews
1. Sahardid v Camden LBC
2. Osseily v Westminster CC
suitability of accommodation and homelessness:social grounds, suitability on
1. R v Lewisham LBC ex p Dolan
suitability of accommodation and homelessness:substitution of own views by recorders
1. Watson v Wandsworth LBC
suitability of accommodation and homelessness:support services, proximity to
1. Suitability and out of area placements
suitability of accommodation and homelessness:Wales
1. Suitability and out of area placements
suitable alternative accommodation :35 years, where tenants living in property for
1. Battlespring Ltd v Gates
suitable alternative accommodation :appeals
1. Lee v Whitehouse
suitable alternative accommodation :assured tenancies
1. Laimond Properties Ltd v Al-Shakarchi
2. Suitable alternative accommodation
suitable alternative accommodation :buses, property unsuitable where tenant would have to wait much longer for
1. Rosemary Estates Ltd v Connolly
suitable alternative accommodation :environment, relevance of
1. Hill v Rochard
2. Redspring v Francis
3. Siddiqui v Rashid
suitable alternative accommodation :financial hardship of parties, balancing
1. Amrit Holdings Co Ltd v Shahbakhti
suitable alternative accommodation :ground for possession
1. Suitable alternative accommodation
2. Akram v Adam
3. Amrit Holdings Co Ltd v Shahbakhti
4. Fennbend Ltd v Millar
5. Hill v Rochard
6. Jones v Cook
7. Montross Associated Investments v Stone
8. Mykolyshyn v Noah
9. Redspring v Francis
10. Siddiqui v Rashid
11. Yewbright Properties Ltd v Stone
12. Yoland Ltd v Reddington
13. Rosemary Estates Ltd v Connolly
14. Suitable alternative accommodation
15. Battlespring Ltd v Gates
16. Dawncar Investments Ltd v Plews
17. Lee v Whitehouse
18. Minchburn Estates Ltd v Fernandez
suitable alternative accommodation :injunctions to prevent tenants for disposing of property they owned
1. Fennbend Ltd v Millar
suitable alternative accommodation :neighbourhood, differences in
1. Dawncar Investments Ltd v Plews
suitable alternative accommodation :part of existing accommodation could be alternative accommodation
1. Mykolyshyn v Noah
2. Yoland Ltd v Reddington
suitable alternative accommodation :possession orders
1. Laimond Properties Ltd v Al-Shakarchi
2. Suitable alternative accommodation
3. Battlespring Ltd v Gates
4. Dawncar Investments Ltd v Plews
5. Lee v Whitehouse
6. Minchburn Estates Ltd v Fernandez
suitable alternative accommodation :reasonableness of possession orders
1. Suitable alternative accommodation
2. Battlespring Ltd v Gates
3. Dawncar Investments Ltd v Plews
4. Lee v Whitehouse
5. Minchburn Estates Ltd v Fernandez
suitable alternative accommodation :Rent Act tenancies
1. Suitable alternative accommodation
suitable alternative accommodation :secure tenancies
1. Suitable alternative accommodation
suitable alternative accommodation :similar property to type referred to in local authority certificates
1. Jones v Cook
suitable alternative accommodation :standards of existing accommodation, relevance of
1. Hill v Rochard
suitable alternative accommodation :time of orders, available at
1. Akram v Adam
suitable alternative accommodation :views as not being a housing need
1. Montross Associated Investments v Stone
suitable alternative accommodation :work, proximity to
1. Yewbright Properties Ltd v Stone
2. Rosemary Estates Ltd v Connolly
summonses
1. Patel v Smeaton
support services, proximity to
1. Suitability and out of area placements
surfaces
1. Hallisey v Petmoor Developments Ltd
2. Ibrahim v Dovecorn Reversions Ltd
surrender:24 hours, tenants vacating flats for
1. Bolnore Properties Ltd v Cobb
surrender
1. Barrett v Morgan
2. Surrender
3. André v Robinson
4. Basingstoke and Deane BC v Paice
5. Belcourt Estates Ltd v Adesina
6. Bolnore Properties Ltd v Cobb
7. Bone v Bone
8. Brent LBC v Sharma and Vyas
9. Camden LBC v Alexandrou
10. Chamberlain v Scalley
11. Climping Park Ltd v Barritt
12. Foster v Robinson
13. Laine v Cadwallader
14. Leek and Moorlands Building Society v Clark
15. Mattey Securities Ltd v Ervin
16. Preston BC v Fairclough
17. Proudreed Ltd v Microgen Holdings plc
18. Sanctuary Housing Association v Campbell
19. Zionmor v Islington LBC
20. Coker v London Rent Assessment Panel
surrender:absence, not implied by
1. Chamberlain v Scalley
surrender:acceptance of surrender
1. Zionmor v Islington LBC
surrender:assignment
1. Clore v MacNicol
2. Sanctuary Housing Association v Baker
3. Camden LBC v Alexandrou
surrender:assured tenancies
1. Truro Diocesan Board of Finance Ltd v Foley
surrender:contractual tenancies
1. Truro Diocesan Board of Finance Ltd v Foley
surrender:deeds
1. Surrender
surrender:definition
1. Surrender
surrender:estoppel
1. Foster v Robinson
surrender:farm workers need no longer pay rent, agreements that
1. Foster v Robinson
surrender:harassment and illegal eviction, damages for
1. Odera v Iqbal
surrender:implied surrender
1. Sanctuary Housing Association v Baker
2. Coker v London Rent Assessment Panel
3. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Quigley
surrender:inequitable for parties to dispute termination, where it is
1. Belcourt Estates Ltd v Adesina
surrender:joint tenants
1. Leek and Moorlands Building Society v Clark
surrender:keys, handing over
1. Bolnore Properties Ltd v Cobb
2. Laine v Cadwallader
3. Proudreed Ltd v Microgen Holdings plc
4. Zionmor v Islington LBC
surrender:leave premises owing rent, where tenants
1. Preston BC v Fairclough
surrender:letters from tenants regarding transfers of tenancies
1. Brent LBC v Sharma and Vyas
surrender:licensees moving out
1. Bone v Bone
surrender:long absences with large arrears
1. Chamberlain v Scalley
surrender:new accommodation, no surrender despite tenants indicating they had
1. Odera v Iqbal
surrender:new agreements, surrender of old agreements on
1. Climping Park Ltd v Barritt
surrender:non-tenants, payment of rent by
1. Mattey Securities Ltd v Ervin
surrender:note to other tenants, tenants leaving
1. Sanctuary Housing Association v Campbell
surrender:notice to quit
1. Barrett v Morgan
surrender:offers of surrender
1. Laine v Cadwallader
surrender:one of joint tenants
1. Leek and Moorlands Building Society v Clark
surrender:operation of law, by
1. Surrender
2. Belcourt Estates Ltd v Adesina
3. Camden LBC v Alexandrou
surrender:oral surrender
1. Surrender
surrender:possession proceedings, quashing of decisions to bring
1. Coker v London Rent Assessment Panel
surrender:Rent Act tenancies
1. Truro Diocesan Board of Finance Ltd v Foley
surrender:rent arrears
1. Chamberlain v Scalley
2. Mattey Securities Ltd v Ervin
3. Preston BC v Fairclough
surrender:security of tenure
1. R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Quigley
surrender:subtenants becoming tenants on surrender
1. Basingstoke and Deane BC v Paice
surrender:succession
1. Clore v MacNicol
surrender:unambiguous acts or series of acts
1. André v Robinson
2. Belcourt Estates Ltd v Adesina
surveyors
1. Hall v Howard
2. D & F Estates Ltd v Church Commissioners
3. Southwark LBC v Simpson
4. Citibank Trust Ltd v Ayivor
survivorship
1. Birmingham CC v Walker
2. Tennant v Hutton
suspended possession orders :55 years to pay of arrears, where it would take
1. Taj v Ali (No 1)
suspended possession orders :appeals
1. Admiral Taverns (Cygnet) Ltd v Daniel and Daly
2. Ealing LBC v Richardson
3. Taj v Ali (No 2)
4. Hyde Park Funding Ltd v Ioannou
5. Lloyds TSB plc v Jayashankar
suspended possession orders :arrears, where no prospect of reducing
1. Abbey National Mortgages v Bernard
suspended possession orders :breach of obligations as ground for possession
1. Kensington and Chelsea RLBC v Simmonds
suspended possession orders :change of circumstances, variation where
1. Ujima Housing Association v Smith
suspended possession orders :children, control of
1. Knowsley Housing Trust v McMullen
suspended possession orders :consent, suspending possession beyond limits by
1. R v Ilkeston County Court ex p Kruza
suspended possession orders :discretion
1. McPhail v Persons Unknown
2. Vandermolen v Toma
suspended possession orders :effect
1. Church Commissioners for England v Al-Emarah
suspended possession orders :enforcement
1. Church Commissioners for England v Al-Emarah
2. Mortgage Agency Services v Bal
3. Hyde Park Funding Ltd v Ioannou
4. Lloyds TSB plc v Jayashankar
suspended possession orders :everyday practice, as
1. Hayman v Rowlands
suspended possession orders :exceptional circumstances
1. Knowsley Housing Trust v McMullen
suspended possession orders :imprisonment
1. New Charter Housing (North) Ltd v Ashcroft
suspended possession orders :indefinite suspension on payment of current rent
1. Vandermolen v Toma
suspended possession orders :injunctions
1. Canterbury CC v Lowe
suspended possession orders :Matrimonial Homes Act 1983, transfer of tenancies under
1. Church Commissioners for England v Al-Emarah
suspended possession orders :money judgments
1. Cheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Grattidge
2. Cheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Johnson
suspended possession orders :more than one occasion, discretion exercised on
1. Vandermolen v Toma
suspended possession orders :mortgage possession proceedings
1. Hyde Park Funding Ltd v Ioannou
2. Lloyds TSB plc v Jayashankar
suspended possession orders :mortgage possession proceedings:appeals after execution of warrants
1. Hyde Park Funding Ltd v Ioannou
2. Lloyds TSB plc v Jayashankar
suspended possession orders :mortgage possession proceedings:arrears, where no prospect of reducing
1. Abbey National Mortgages v Bernard
suspended possession orders :mortgage possession proceedings:early sale, prospect of
1. Target Home Loans v Clothier
suspended possession orders :mortgage possession proceedings:execution of warrants
1. Mortgage Agency Services v Bal
2. Hyde Park Funding Ltd v Ioannou
3. Lloyds TSB plc v Jayashankar
suspended possession orders :mortgage possession proceedings:fixing period of time
1. Royal Trust Co of Canada v Markham
suspended possession orders :mortgage possession proceedings:general terms
1. Royal Trust Co of Canada v Markham
suspended possession orders :mortgage possession proceedings:inherent jurisdiction
1. Cheltenham and Gloucester plc v Booker
suspended possession orders :mortgage possession proceedings:instalments, agreements to pay by
1. Royal Bank of Scotland v Elmes
suspended possession orders :mortgage possession proceedings:money judgments
1. Cheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Grattidge
2. Cheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Johnson
suspended possession orders :mortgage possession proceedings:mortgagors, tenants of
1. Abbey National plc v Yusuf
2. National Westminster Home Loans v Riches
suspended possession orders :mortgage possession proceedings:no further applications, orders for
1. Abbey National Building Society v Mewton
suspended possession orders :mortgage possession proceedings:reasonable period
1. Cheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Norgan
suspended possession orders :mortgage possession proceedings:refusal to suspend
1. Cheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Frasca
2. Hyde Park Funding Ltd v Ioannou
suspended possession orders :mortgage possession proceedings:sale of property
1. Cheltenham and Gloucester plc v Booker
2. Target Home Loans v Clothier
3. Cheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Krausz
suspended possession orders :mortgage possession proceedings:terms of mortgage
1. Centrax Trustees v Ross
suspended possession orders :notice requiring possession
1. Notice requiring possession (Housing Act 1988 s21)
suspended possession orders :nuisance and annoyance
1. Portsmouth CC v Bryant
2. Knowsley Housing Trust v McMullen
3. New Charter Housing (North) Ltd v Ashcroft
suspended possession orders :obvious orders to make, as
1. Lambeth LBC v Henry
suspended possession orders :outright orders
1. Ujima Housing Association v Smith
2. Taj v Ali (No 2)
suspended possession orders :payment of current rent where no arrears
1. Vandermolen v Toma
suspended possession orders :pointless, judges viewing suspension as
1. Norwich CC v Famuyiwa
suspended possession orders :reasonable period
1. Cheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Norgan
suspended possession orders :regret, where tenants show no
1. New Charter Housing (North) Ltd v Ashcroft
suspended possession orders :rehearings, injustice needed for
1. Ealing LBC v Richardson
suspended possession orders :rent arrears
1. Hayman v Rowlands
2. Lambeth LBC v Henry
3. Taj v Ali (No 1)
4. Vandermolen v Toma
suspended possession orders :sale of property
1. Cheltenham and Gloucester plc v Booker
2. Target Home Loans v Clothier
3. Cheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Krausz
suspended possession orders :trespassers
1. McPhail v Persons Unknown
2. Swordheath Properties Ltd v Floydd
suspended possession orders :variation
1. Ujima Housing Association v Smith
suspended possession orders :wrong in principle, suspension not
1. Portsmouth CC v Bryant
suspension of warrants before execution
1. Suspension of warrants before execution
2. Barnet LBC v Hurley
3. R v Ilkeston County Court ex p Kruza
4. Stonebridge HAT v Gabbidon
suspension of warrants before execution:appeals, no further breaches prior to listing of
1. Barnet LBC v Hurley
suspension of warrants before execution:breach
1. Barnet LBC v Hurley
2. R v Ilkeston County Court ex p Kruza
3. Stonebridge HAT v Gabbidon
suspension of warrants before execution:consent, suspending possession beyond limits by
1. R v Ilkeston County Court ex p Kruza
suspension of warrants before execution:county court, jurisdiction of
1. R v Ilkeston County Court ex p Kruza
suspension of warrants before execution:drug issues
1. Stonebridge HAT v Gabbidon
suspension of warrants before execution:excluded spouses, breach caused by
1. Barnet LBC v Hurley
suspension of warrants before execution:further suspensions
1. Barnet LBC v Hurley
suspension of warrants before execution:hearings, applications not heard prior to
1. Islington LBC v Harridge
suspension of warrants before execution:jurisdiction
1. R v Ilkeston County Court ex p Kruza
suspension of warrants before execution:postponement of possession
1. Suspension of warrants before execution
suspension of warrants before execution:Rent Act tenancies
1. Suspension of warrants before execution
suspension of warrants before execution:rent arrears
1. Stonebridge HAT v Gabbidon
suspension of warrants before execution:secure tenancies
1. Suspension of warrants before execution
suspension of warrants before execution:security of tenure
1. Suspension of warrants before execution
suspension of warrants before execution:spouses, breach caused by excluded
1. Barnet LBC v Hurley
tax
1. Eaton Square Properties Ltd v O’Higgins
telephone:harassment
1. Khorasandjian v Bush
telephone:homelessness reviews
1. Makisi v Birmingham CC; Yosief v Birmingham CC; Nagi v Birmingham CC
temporary accommodation:appeals
1. Richards v Green
temporary accommodation:armed conflicts
1. Wigley v Leigh
temporary accommodation:development, temporary use pending
1. Temporary use pending development (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 3)
2. Attley v Cherwell DC
3. Hyde Housing Association Ltd v Harrison
4. Lillieshall Road Housing Co-operative Ltd v Brennan
temporary accommodation:disrepair, damages for
1. Ezekiel v McDade
temporary accommodation:homelessness, definition of
1. R v Brent LBC ex p Awua
temporary accommodation:intention to return
1. Brickfield Properties Ltd v Hughes
temporary accommodation:long periods
1. Occupation as a residence; Rent Act 1977 s2(1)(a)
2. Bevington v Crawford
3. Brickfield Properties Ltd v Hughes
4. Gofor Investments v Roberts
5. Prince v Robinson
temporary accommodation:occupation as a residence
1. Occupation as a residence; Rent Act 1977 s2(1)(a)
2. Bevington v Crawford
3. Brickfield Properties Ltd v Hughes
4. Gofor Investments v Roberts
5. Prince v Robinson
6. Richards v Green
7. Wigley v Leigh
temporary accommodation:Protection from Eviction Act 1977
1. Mohamed v Manek and Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
2. Rogerson v Wigan MBC
temporary accommodation:subtenancies
1. Hussey v Camden LBC
temporary accommodation:tuberculosis, due to
1. Wigley v Leigh
tenant condition
1. Occupation as only or principal home: Housing Act 1985 s81 and Housing Act 1988 s1(1)(b); Prohibition against subletting: Housing Act 1985 s93 and Housing Act 1988 s15A
Tenant’s Charter, consultation of
1. Housing management and consultation (secure tenants)
tenants in common, premises required for
1. Bostock v Tacher de la Pagerie
termination of tenancies at common law
1. Introduction
termination of tenancies at common law:forfeiture
1. Forfeiture
2. Billson v Residential Apartments Ltd
3. Adagio Properties v Ansari
4. British Petroleum Pension Trust v Behrendt
5. Central Estates (Belgravia) Ltd v Woolgar (No 2)
6. Chrisdell Ltd v Johnson and Tickner
7. Cooper v Henderson
8. Cornillie v Saha and Bradford and Bingley Building Society
9. Courtney Lodge Management Ltd v Blake
10. Croydon (Unique) Ltd v Wright
11. Eaton Square Properties Ltd v Beveridge
12. Escalus Properties Ltd v Robinson
13. Hynes v Twinsectra Ltd
14. Khar v Delbounty Ltd
15. Maryland Estates v Bar-Joseph
16. Patel v K & J Restaurants Ltd
17. Reichman v Beveridge
18. Savva v Houssein
19. Sinclair Gardens Investments (Kensington) v Walsh
20. Smith v Spaul
21. Swordheath Properties Ltd v Bolt
22. Thomas v Ken Thomas Ltd
23. Ashton v Sobelman
24. Billson v Residential Apartments Ltd (No 2)
25. Church Commissioners for England v Nodjoumi
26. Rendham Holdings Ltd v Patel
27. Southern Depot Co Ltd v British Railways Board
28. Van Haarlam v Kasner Charitable Trust
termination of tenancies at common law:surrender
1. Barrett v Morgan
2. Surrender
3. André v Robinson
4. Basingstoke and Deane BC v Paice
5. Belcourt Estates Ltd v Adesina
6. Bolnore Properties Ltd v Cobb
7. Bone v Bone
8. Brent LBC v Sharma and Vyas
9. Camden LBC v Alexandrou
10. Chamberlain v Scalley
11. Climping Park Ltd v Barritt
12. Foster v Robinson
13. Laine v Cadwallader
14. Leek and Moorlands Building Society v Clark
15. Mattey Securities Ltd v Ervin
16. Preston BC v Fairclough
17. Proudreed Ltd v Microgen Holdings plc
18. Sanctuary Housing Association v Campbell
19. Zionmor v Islington LBC
20. Coker v London Rent Assessment Panel
terraces of flats
1. Ibrahim v Dovecorn Reversions Ltd
threats of homelessness
1. Reasonable to continue to occupy: s175(3)
2. Threatened with homelessness: s175(4)
threats to kill
1. Nottingham CC v Cutts
time limits:agents or applications, notification of decisions to
1. Dharmaraj v Hounslow LBC
time limits:appeals
1. R (Van der Stolk) v Camden LBC
time limits:assured shorthold tenancies
1. Introduction
time limits:case stated
1. Liverpool CC v Worthington
time limits:consumer credit
1. Rahman v Sterling Credit Ltd
time limits:counterclaims
1. Islington LBC v Keane
2. Rahman v Sterling Credit Ltd
time limits:court closed, where
1. Aadan v Brent LBC
2. Van Aken v Camden LBC
time limits:date of notification of original review, time running from
1. Demetri v Westminster CC
time limits:Defective Premises Act 1972
1. Alderson v Beetham Organisation Ltd
time limits:delay, reasons for
1. R (C) v Lewisham LBC
time limits:deposits
1. Draycott and Draycott v Hannells Letting Limited
time limits:disabled applicants having problems finding solicitors
1. Barrett v Southwark LBC
time limits:disrepair
1. Islington LBC v Keane
2. Millington v Islington LBC
time limits:Environmental Protection Act 1990, criminal proceedings under
1. Liverpool CC v Worthington
time limits:extension
1. Millington v Islington LBC
2. Bradford and Bingley plc v Rashid
3. R (C) v Lewisham LBC
4. R (Slaiman) v Richmond upon Thames LBC
5. Adams v Southwark LBC
6. Aadan v Brent LBC
7. Barrett v Southwark LBC
8. Short v Birmingham CC
time limits:final day of limits
1. Van Aken v Camden LBC
time limits:homelessness decisions,:agents or applications, notification of decisions to
1. Dharmaraj v Hounslow LBC
time limits:homelessness decisions,:appeals
1. Appeals: time limits, bringing an appeal and fees
2. Aadan v Brent LBC
3. Demetri v Westminster CC
4. Dharmaraj v Hounslow LBC
5. Van Aken v Camden LBC
6. Barrett v Southwark LBC
7. Short v Birmingham CC
time limits:homelessness decisions,:court closed, where
1. Aadan v Brent LBC
2. Van Aken v Camden LBC
time limits:homelessness decisions,:date of notification of original review, time running from
1. Demetri v Westminster CC
time limits:homelessness decisions,:disabled applicants having problems finding solicitors
1. Barrett v Southwark LBC
time limits:homelessness decisions,:extension
1. Aadan v Brent LBC
2. Barrett v Southwark LBC
3. Short v Birmingham CC
time limits:homelessness decisions,:final day of limits
1. Van Aken v Camden LBC
time limits:homelessness decisions,:good reason or good cause
1. Barrett v Southwark LBC
2. Short v Birmingham CC
time limits:homelessness decisions,:judicial review
1. R v Hillingdon LBC ex p Puhlhofer
time limits:homelessness decisions,:reviews
1. R (C) v Lewisham LBC
2. R (Slaiman) v Richmond upon Thames LBC
3. Adams v Southwark LBC
time limits:interest, claims for
1. Bristol and West plc v Bartlett
2. Scottish Equitable v Thompson
time limits:judicial review
1. R v Hillingdon LBC ex p Puhlhofer
time limits:merits of decision when extending time, no consideration of
1. R (Slaiman) v Richmond upon Thames LBC
time limits:mortgage possession proceedings
1. Securum Finance Ltd v Ashton
2. Rahman v Sterling Credit Ltd
3. Bradford and Bingley plc v Rashid
4. Bristol and West plc v Bartlett
5. Scottish Equitable v Thompson
6. West Bromwich Building Society v Wilkinson
time limits:notice requiring possession
1. Introduction
2. Notice requiring possession (Housing Act 1988 s21)
3. Elias v Spencer
4. Fernandez v McDonald
5. Gracechurch International v Tribhovan and Abdul
6. Singh v Emmanuel
time limits:notice to quit
1. Manorlike Ltd v Le Vitas Travel Agency
2. Schnabel v Allard
3. Precious v Reedie
4. Protection from Eviction Act 1977 (civil provisions)
time limits:personal injury
1. Millington v Islington LBC
time limits:prospects of success
1. R (C) v Lewisham LBC
time limits:settlement, extended by offers of
1. Bradford and Bingley plc v Rashid
time limits:squatters
1. Swordheath Properties Ltd v Floydd
time limits:suspension of possession orders
1. Swordheath Properties Ltd v Floydd
time limits:trespassers
1. Swordheath Properties Ltd v Floydd
time orders
1. Consumer Credit Act 1974
2. Southern and District Finance plc v Barnes
3. Cedar Holdings v Jenkins
title
1. Bruton v London and Quadrant Housing Trust
toilets next to kitchens
1. Birmingham CC v Oakley
tolerated trespassers
1. The effect of possession orders – in general
Tomlin orders
1. Kahlon v Isherwood
tort:disrepair
1. Delaware Mansions Ltd v City of Westminster
2. Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd
3. Habinteg Housing Association v James
4. Lambert v Barratt Homes Ltd and Rochdale MBC
5. Sharpe v Manchester MDC
6. D & F Estates Ltd v Church Commissioners
7. McNerny v Lambeth LBC
8. Rimmer v Liverpool CC
9. Stevens v Blaenau Gwent CBC
10. Stockley v Knowsley MBC
11. Targett v Torfaen BC
12. Lips v Older
13. Walker v Nottingham CC
14. Hawkins v Dhawan
tort:harassment and illegal eviction
1. Civil proceedings
torture: prohibition of
1. Article 3: Prohibition of torture
torture: prohibition of;
1. Smirnova v Ukraine
transfers:allocation
1. General
2. R (Ahmad) v Newham LBC
3. R (Lin) v Barnet LBC
transfers:appeals, accommodation pending
1. Francis v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
transfers:county courts
1. Francis v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
transfers:Crown Estates Commissioners, transfer of property to housing associations by
1. Crown Estate Commissioners v Governors of the Peabody Trust
transfers:domestic violence
1. R v Newham LBC ex p McIlroy
transfers:homelessness, reasonable belief in
1. R v Islington LBC ex p B
transfers:joint tenancies
1. Gay v Sheeran
transfers:letters from tenants regarding transfers of tenancies
1. Brent LBC v Sharma and Vyas
transfers:parts of interests
1. Gay v Sheeran
transfers:points
1. R (Lin) v Barnet LBC
transfers:priorities
1. R (Ahmad) v Newham LBC
transfers:subtenancies
1. Gay v Sheeran
transfers:succession
1. Waltham Forest LBC v Thomas
transfers:urgent transfers
1. R v Newham LBC ex p McIlroy
transfers:violence
1. R v Newham LBC ex p McIlroy
translation of offer letters
1. Ali v Birmingham CC
travel :affordability
1. Begum (Nipa) v Tower Hamlets LBC
travel :buses, property unsuitable where tenant would have to wait much longer for
1. Rosemary Estates Ltd v Connolly
travel :school, duration of travel time to
1. Williams v Birmingham CC
travel :suitable alternative accommodation
1. Rosemary Estates Ltd v Connolly
travelling shows
1. R v Chiltern DC ex p Roberts
trees, highway authorities responsible for roots of
1. Delaware Mansions Ltd v City of Westminster
trespassers, injunctions:impossible to identify occupants, where
1. South Cambridgeshire DC v Gammell; Bromley LBC v Maughan
trespassers, injunctions:intention to trespass
1. Hampshire Waste Services Ltd v Persons Unknown
trespassers, injunctions:intention to trespass by protestors
1. Hampshire Waste Services Ltd v Persons Unknown
trespassers, injunctions:interim possession orders
1. Introduction
trespassers, injunctions:landlords, liability of
1. Civil proceedings
trespassers, injunctions:licensees
1. Manchester Airport plc v Dutton
trespassers, injunctions:mesne profits
1. Mesne profits
2. Swordheath Properties Ltd v Tabet
trespassers, injunctions:named, no requirement for protestors to be
1. Hampshire Waste Services Ltd v Persons Unknown
trespassers, injunctions:possession claims
1. Claims for possession and injunctions against alleged trespassers
2. Countryside Residential (North Thames) Ltd v Tugwell
3. Manchester Airport plc v Dutton
4. McPhail v Persons Unknown
5. South Cambridgeshire DC v Gammell; Bromley LBC v Maughan
6. Swordheath Properties Ltd v Floydd
7. Whitbread West Pennines Ltd v Reedy
8. Hampshire Waste Services Ltd v Persons Unknown
9. R v Hillingdon LBC ex p McDonagh
10. R v Leeds CC ex p Maloney
11. R v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food ex p Callaghan
12. R (Casey) v Crawley BC
trespassers, injunctions:possession orders
1. McPhail v Persons Unknown
2. Swordheath Properties Ltd v Floydd
3. Wiltshire CC v Frazer (No 2)
4. Admiral Taverns (Cygnet) Ltd v Daniel and Daly
trespassers, injunctions:postponement of possession
1. Admiral Taverns (Cygnet) Ltd v Daniel and Daly
trespassers, injunctions:private and family life and home, right to respect
1. Horie v UK
trespassers, injunctions:private and family life and home, right to respect for
1. Horie v UK
trespassers, injunctions:reinstatement claims
1. Whitbread West Pennines Ltd v Reedy
trespassers, injunctions:relevant matters, consideration of all
1. R (Casey) v Crawley BC
trespassers, injunctions:squatters
1. Swordheath Properties Ltd v Floydd
trespassers, injunctions:sufficient interest, claimants with right of access lacking
1. Countryside Residential (North Thames) Ltd v Tugwell
trespassers, injunctions:suspension of possession orders
1. McPhail v Persons Unknown
2. Swordheath Properties Ltd v Floydd
trespassers, injunctions:time limits
1. Swordheath Properties Ltd v Floydd
trespassers, injunctions:tolerated trespassers
1. The effect of possession orders – in general
trespassers, injunctions:unfair dismissal
1. Whitbread West Pennines Ltd v Reedy
trespassers, injunctions:unknown, against persons
1. South Cambridgeshire DC v Gammell; Bromley LBC v Maughan
2. Hampshire Waste Services Ltd v Persons Unknown
trespassers, injunctions:unknown, injunctions against persons
1. South Cambridgeshire DC v Gammell; Bromley LBC v Maughan
trespassers, injunctions:use of force
1. Claims for possession and injunctions against alleged trespassers
trespassers, injunctions:writs of restitution
1. Wiltshire CC v Frazer (No 2)
trespassers:access, right of
1. Countryside Residential (North Thames) Ltd v Tugwell
trespassers:Civil Procedure Rules
1. Claims for possession and injunctions against alleged trespassers
trespassers:close nexus between current and past occupiers
1. Wiltshire CC v Frazer (No 2)
trespassers:common law
1. Claims for possession and injunctions against alleged trespassers
trespassers:control, right of access but no effective
1. Countryside Residential (North Thames) Ltd v Tugwell
trespassers:damages
1. Mesne profits
2. Swordheath Properties Ltd v Tabet
trespassers:discretion to suspend possession orders
1. McPhail v Persons Unknown
trespassers:employees
1. Whitbread West Pennines Ltd v Reedy
2. R v Portsmouth CC ex p Knight
trespassers:exclusive possession
1. Civil proceedings
trespassers:former employees
1. Whitbread West Pennines Ltd v Reedy
trespassers:government departments not under obligations owed by councils
1. R v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food ex p Callaghan
trespassers:Gypsies and Travellers
1. R v Leeds CC ex p Maloney
2. R v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food ex p Callaghan
3. R (Casey) v Crawley BC
trespassers:harassment and illegal eviction
1. Patel v W H Smith (Eziot) Ltd
2. Civil proceedings
trespassers:homeless persons
1. R v Hillingdon LBC ex p McDonagh
2. R v Portsmouth CC ex p Knight
trespassers:impossible to identify occupants, injunctions where
1. South Cambridgeshire DC v Gammell; Bromley LBC v Maughan
trespassers:injunctions
1. Horie v UK
2. South Cambridgeshire DC v Gammell; Bromley LBC v Maughan
trespassers:injunctions:harassment and illegal eviction
1. Patel v W H Smith (Eziot) Ltd
trial periods, duration of
1. Introductory tenancies
trusts:beneficiaries
1. Gray v Taylor
trusts:breach
1. Greenwich LBC v McGrady
trusts:joint tenants
1. Greenwich LBC v McGrady
trusts:notice to quit
1. Greenwich LBC v McGrady
trusts:sale, breach of trusts for
1. Greenwich LBC v McGrady
tuberculosis
1. Wigley v Leigh
two separate units, provided in
1. R v Hackney LBC ex p Tonnicodi
under-occupation
1. Death of tenant
undertakings to carry out works
1. Court orders and undertakings to carry out works
2. Connell v Hackney LBC
3. Mullen v Hackney LBC
4. R v Wandsworth County Court ex p Munn
5. Rainbow Estates v Tokenhold Ltd
unemployed
1. R (Mohamed) v Harrow LBC
unfair contract terms
1. Set-off and counterclaim
2. Cody v Philps
3. Khatun, Zeb and Iqbal v Newham LBC and Office of Fair Trading
Unfair contract terms - residential tenancy agreements
1. Brusse and de Man Garabito v Jahani BV
unfair dismissal
1. Whitbread West Pennines Ltd v Reedy
urban living, conditions of
1. Brent LBC v Doughan
urgent cases:allocation
1. General
urgent cases:homelessness
1. Homeless as a result of an emergency
2. Higgs v Brighton and Hove CC
3. Noble v South Herefordshire DC
4. R v Bristol CC ex p Bradic
urgent cases:injunctions
1. Interim injunctions
urgent cases:preferences
1. General
use of force
1. Claims for possession and injunctions against alleged trespassers
vacant possession:calculation of losses due to deprivation of vacant possession
1. Shi v Jiangsu Native Produce Import & Export Corp
vacant possession:exemplary damages
1. Islam v Yap
vacant possession:forfeiture
1. Patel v K & J Restaurants Ltd
vacant possession:harassment and illegal eviction, damages for
1. Islam v Yap
vacant possession:imprisonment for failure to vacate premises
1. Trustee in Bankruptcy of Canty v Canty
vacant possession:mesne profits
1. Shi v Jiangsu Native Produce Import & Export Corp
vacant possession:possession orders, enforcement of
1. Trustee in Bankruptcy of Canty v Canty
2. Anchor HA v Person Unknown
vacant possession:private sector
1. Private sector leasing (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 6)
2. Haringey LBC v Hickey
3. Tower Hamlets LBC v Abdi
4. Tower Hamlets LBC v Miah
5. Westminster CC v Boraliu
vacant possession:public landlords, leases of property to
1. Private sector leasing (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 6)
2. Haringey LBC v Hickey
3. Tower Hamlets LBC v Abdi
4. Tower Hamlets LBC v Miah
5. Westminster CC v Boraliu
vacant possession:reoccupation by different persons
1. Anchor HA v Person Unknown
vacant possession:subtenancies by public landlords
1. Private sector leasing (Housing Act 1985 Sch 1 para 6)
2. Haringey LBC v Hickey
3. Tower Hamlets LBC v Abdi
4. Tower Hamlets LBC v Miah
5. Westminster CC v Boraliu
vandalism
1. R v Gloucester CC ex p Miles
variation of non-rent terms
1. Variation of non-rent terms (secure tenants)
2. Palmer v Sandwell MBC
3. R (Kilby) v Basildon DC
4. R v Brent LBC ex p Blatt
variation of rent terms
1. Variation of non-rent terms (secure tenants)
2. Palmer v Sandwell MBC
3. R (Kilby) v Basildon DC
4. R v Brent LBC ex p Blatt
view accommodation, opportunity to
1. Khatun, Zeb and Iqbal v Newham LBC and Office of Fair Trading
views as not being a housing need
1. Montross Associated Investments v Stone
violence:availability of accommodation
1. R v Westminster CC ex p Bishop
violence:homelessness
1. R v Newham LBC ex p Campbell
2. R v Greenwich LBC ex p Patterson
violence:lynch mob behaviour by tenants
1. Tower Hamlets LBC v Long
violence:police protection, seeking
1. R v Croydon LBC ex p Toth
violence:risk of violence in another area, duty to make enquiries as to
1. R v Greenwich LBC ex p Patterson
violence:settled accommodation and intentional homelessness
1. R v Newham LBC ex p Campbell
violence:urgent transfers, tenants could have stayed pending
1. R v Newham LBC ex p McIlroy
visitors, conduct of
1. Camden LBC v Gilsenan
vulnerable persons:definition of vulnerability
1. Vulnerable
vulnerable persons:drug addiction
1. Crossley v Westminster CC
vulnerable persons:enquiries, inadequacy of
1. Benson v Lewisham LBC
vulnerable persons:facts, evaluation of all the
1. Crossley v Westminster CC
vulnerable persons:guidance
1. Vulnerable
2. Shala v Birmingham CC
vulnerable persons:homelessness
1. Priority need
2. Vulnerable
3. Allison v Wandsworth LBC
4. Crossley v Westminster CC
5. Mangion v Lewisham LBC
6. R v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p Kihara
7. Shala v Birmingham CC
8. Simms v Islington LBC
9. R v Lambeth LBC ex p Carroll
10. Benson v Lewisham LBC
11. Kelly v Westminster CC
12. Griffiths v St Helens MBC
vulnerable persons:institutionalised, whether prisoners have become
1. Kelly v Westminster CC
vulnerable persons:manage own affairs, capacity to
1. Hijazi v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC
2. R v Wirral MBC ex p Bell
vulnerable persons:medical advisers, use of
1. Shala v Birmingham CC
2. Simms v Islington LBC
vulnerable persons:medical evidence
1. Allison v Wandsworth LBC
vulnerable persons:medical officers, opinions of
1. Crossley v Westminster CC
vulnerable persons:other special reason
1. R v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p Kihara
vulnerable persons:Pereira test
1. Vulnerable
vulnerable persons:priority need
1. Priority need
2. Vulnerable
3. Allison v Wandsworth LBC
4. Crossley v Westminster CC
5. Mangion v Lewisham LBC
6. R v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC ex p Kihara
7. Shala v Birmingham CC
8. Simms v Islington LBC
9. R v Lambeth LBC ex p Carroll
10. Benson v Lewisham LBC
11. Kelly v Westminster CC
vulnerable persons:prisoners not institutionalised, decisions that
1. Kelly v Westminster CC
vulnerable persons:severe disability for benefit purposes, assessment of
1. Mangion v Lewisham LBC
vulnerable persons:single men with health problems, inadequate enquiries about
1. Benson v Lewisham LBC
vulnerable persons:Wednesbury unreasonableness
1. Kelly v Westminster CC
Wales
1. Suitability and out of area placements
walls:false walls
1. Fincar SRL v 109/113 Mount Street Management Co Ltd
walls:outside walls
1. Campden Hill Towers Ltd v Gardner
walls:structure
1. Smedley v Chumley and Hawkes Ltd
2. Campden Hill Towers Ltd v Gardner
3. Fincar SRL v 109/113 Mount Street Management Co Ltd
4. Hallisey v Petmoor Developments Ltd
walls:subsidence
1. Smedley v Chumley and Hawkes Ltd
warnings:applications for moves, consequences of
1. Muse v Brent LBC
warnings:exemplary damages
1. Keddey v Hughes
warnings:harassment and illegal eviction, damages for
1. Keddey v Hughes
warnings:homelessness
1. Muse v Brent LBC
2. Vilvarasa v Harrow LBC
warnings:previous warnings
1. Vilvarasa v Harrow LBC
warnings:refusal of offers
1. Vilvarasa v Harrow LBC
washers, replacement of
1. Islington LBC v Keane
wasted costs orders
1. R v Lambeth LBC ex p Wilson
water:condensation exacerbated by water penetration
1. Switzer v Law
water:dampness from water penetration
1. Lewis v Courtney
water:disrepair
1. Niazi Services Ltd v Van der Loo
2. Wycombe Area Health Authority v Barnett
3. Lewis v Courtney
4. O’Beirne v Lambeth LBC
5. Switzer v Law
water:extractor fans
1. Switzer v Law
water:hot water, loss of or no
1. Ferguson v Jones
water:joint tenants separately entitled to damages for water penetration
1. O’Beirne v Lambeth LBC
water:pressure due to works in other parts of building
1. Niazi Services Ltd v Van der Loo
water:rates
1. Lewisham LBC v Simba-Tola
2. Lambeth LBC v Thomas
water:tanks, discolouration in old
1. Sheldon v West Bromwich Corporation
water:turn off water, tenant’s failure to
1. Wycombe Area Health Authority v Barnett
Water and sewerage services
1. Rochdale BC v Dixon
2. Jones v Southwark LBC
Water and sewerage services: re-seller
1. Jones v Southwark LBC
Wednesbury unreasonableness
1. Kelly v Westminster CC
will, tenancies at
1. Banjo v Brent LBC
windows:broken glass
1. Lavimizadeh v Lambeth LBC
windows:children, injury to
1. Stevens v Blaenau Gwent CBC
windows:damages
1. Lavimizadeh v Lambeth LBC
2. Fakhari v Newman
windows:Defective Premises Act 1972
1. Adams v Rhymney Valley DC
windows:disrepair
1. Stevens v Blaenau Gwent CBC
2. Lavimizadeh v Lambeth LBC
3. Fakhari v Newman
windows:draughts
1. Fakhari v Newman
windows:locks
1. Stevens v Blaenau Gwent CBC
windows:standards at time of installation
1. Adams v Rhymney Valley DC
without prejudice correspondence
1. Bradford and Bingley plc v Rashid
witnesses, wilful insults to
1. Manchester CC v McCann
women’s refuges:discharge of duty
1. Birmingham CC v Ali and Aweys; Moran v Manchester CC
women’s refuges:homelessness
1. R v Ealing LBC ex p Sidhu
2. Birmingham CC v Ali and Aweys; Moran v Manchester CC
writing:assured shorthold tenancies
1. Bhopal v Walia
writing:creation of tenancies
1. Battersea Churches Housing Trust v Hunte
writing:homelessness
1. Reasons
2. Decisions
writing:invitation to treat
1. Battersea Churches Housing Trust v Hunte
writing:mortgage arrears, agreements on
1. Target Holdings Ltd v Priestley
writing:notice requiring possession
1. Notice requiring possession (Housing Act 1988 s21)
writing:shams
1. Bhopal v Walia
yards as exterior
1. Hopwood v Cannock Chase DC (formerly Rugeley UDC)

Connect with us